San Diego 2010 Division One of the American Psychological Association American Psychological Association Convention APA Presidential Candidates

A Publication of the Society for General Psychology San Diego 2010 Division One of the American Psychological Association American Psychological Association Convention APA Presidential Candidates ..........................2 Ethical Critique: Stanton et al. .........................7 Call for Nominations Anne Anastasi ........................19 Student Research Statistical Crisis: Gorman and Award Primavera .......................21 Presidential Column: Russo ........................28 Awards Announcement ........................31 Graduate Student Corner: Bazar Passing the ........................34 Review of Corsini: Mattson Presidential Gavel ........................36 Book Review: Hollwitz .........................38 Anastasi Student Research Awards ........................40 Student Poster Awards Executive ...........................42 Council of Reps Minutes: Committee Strickland ........................44 D1 D1 Minutes .....................46 President-Elect: Simonton ...................50 Volume 45, No. 2- Fall 2010 The General Psychologist Page 1 APA Presidential Election 2010 by MaryLou Cheal, PhD Arizona State University As is typical for APA, this year there are again five candidates for president of the American Psychological As- sociation: Donald Bersoff, Armand Cerbonne, Paul Craig, Suzanne Johnson, and Robert Woody. Each of these candidates was invited to submit a 500 word statement of how s/he felt about the integration of psychology and the importance of unity within psychology. The candidates were asked how they would encourage unity as president of APA. This statement could include comments on the importance of a general psychology, if desired. Division One does not support any one candidate for APA President, but the Executive Committee is inter- ested in who is running and in how they feel about the unity of psychology. Our division leadership feels that it is very important for the division members to vote in this election and that each member consider the goals of the division in casting his or her vote. It is important to remember the Hare system used by APA and to rank order the candidates. In the Hare system, if your first choice candidate is not elected, your vote goes to your second choice. If both your first and second choice candidates are defeated, then your vote goes to your third choice, and this continues for your fourth and fifth choices, if they are necessary in determining the final winner. For this column, the candidates were told that their statements would be published in the order received. It should be noted that Robert Woody is a fellow of Division One. To be definite about our goal, we are not telling you how to vote, but rather we include the statements here from the candidates who responded to help your decision in voting…NOTE, the important thing is to VOTE! Volume 45, No. 2- Fall 2010 The General Psychologist Page 2 APA Presidential Candidates Respond... of health promotion, disease prevention, and manage- ment of chronic disease. A sense of a unified professional identity is also essential for innovative thinking to promote professional development and research. Unity as well as diverse psychological interests can capture public awareness and support. Although my early training was “practice” in nature (PhD, Michigan State University), I had mentors who guided me into psychological foundations, for example, completing more courses than usual in neuropsy- Robert “Bob” H. Woody, PhD, ScD, JD chology and social/personality psychology. Postdoc- toral training at the University of London’s Institute of Unity within psychology is essential for profession- Psychiatry and the Washington School of Psychiatry alism. By definition, a professional discipline must be added impetus to my commitment to empirically- and organized in a manner that assures benefits for society evidence-based ideas. My move into health services and strengthens the quality of services, such as by eth- administration and research (ScD, University of Pitts- ics, research, and scholarship. The scope of contempo- burgh) crystallized my commitment to psychology in rary psychology is extensive and includes many aca- health care, and prepared me to support new roles and demic and practice areas--unity and specialization best services, such as for psychopharmacology and primary serve the membership and society. care. General psychology is the foundation for the scien- Part of my interest in becoming an attorney (JD, tist-practitioner model. Behavioral science provides the Creighton University) was to apply psychology in gen- theoretical and research basis for the mind and human eral and mental health in specific to law—which was behavior. Although I am a practitioner (clinical, coun- just a short step away from my work in professional seling, school, and forensic psychology), my Professor- ethics, such as being on the APA Ethics Committee. ship at the University of Nebraska at Omaha is aligned increasingly with general psychology; I teach social I am confident that I can deal effectively with the psychology, ethics and law, and history of psychology. complex challenges facing psychology and our society today. Having served on numerous APA committees A cantankerous psychologist once said, “Bob, you throughout my 44 years of membership, I have an un- promote collegiality too much”—to which I respond- derstanding of how the organization functions and I will ed, “Thank you.” Conflicts between psychologists (and work to continue and enhance APA’s efforts to advance specialization groups) weaken the discipline and detract psychology globally for the benefit of ALL people. I from the quality of research, scholarship, and services. will appreciate the support of D1. For more informa- Consequently, I promote strategies to create a sense of tion, see: www.BobWoodyHelpsPsychology.com unity and avoid schisms, such as between academics and practitioners. Systems and group theory can serve the profession well to solve problems in virtually all professional services. My approach supports the APA strategic plan for achieving organizational effectiveness, increasing rec- ognition of psychology as a science, and advancing health objectives. These objectives call for meaningful linkages between all facets of psychology. For example, inclusion of psychology in health policies and laws will depend on psychologists’ foundation knowledge base in general psychology as well as attaining knowledge Volume 45, No. 2- Fall 2010 The General Psychologist Page 3 APA Presidential Candidates Respond... APA’s public interest and professional advocacy in the courts and in the legislatures will only have credibility if it is grounded in science. That is why practitioners should support science and science should support empirically-valid professional activities. My presidential platform is based on the concept of data-based public policy. To paraphrase the song from Oklahoma, the Donald Bersoff, PhD, JD scientist and the practitioner should be friends. By its very title, the Division of General Psychology should advocate and foster this relationship. As the former program chair for Division 1 when Kurt Salzinger was president. I am pleased to respond to your request that I address the issue of unity within APA. This is a particularly timely issue because I am very concerned that APA has become a fractionated association. I took General Psychology over 50 years ago at NYU. The first thing we learned was the definition of psychology--the scientific study of the behavior of human beings and other animals. The definition has not changed, only our forgetting of it. Science and behavior are like conjoined twins connected by their brains- Suzanne Bennett Johnson PhD impossible to separate and deadly to both if they should be. Whether psychologists are clinicians or involved in public interest policy, the scientific underpinnings of Psychology’s diversity is an important component of what they do is crucial to their credibility. its fabric, vibrancy, impact and relevance. Psycholo- gists study all kinds of fascinating topics, work in a wide variety of settings, treat many types of patients Psychologists who engage primarily in assessment and disorders, represent a wide age-range and come must rely on psychometrically sound instruments de- from different cultural/ethnic backgrounds. As the veloped by our colleagues who specialize in measure- world becomes more complex and the diversity of our ment and evaluation. In fact, the United States Supreme nation’s population increases, the face of psychology Court in 1993 ruled that forensic testimony in federal and its contributions will increase in diversity and com- courts must be based on facts, theory, and methodol- plexity as well. Many voices clamor for APA’s attention ogy that is scientifically valid, not merely generally ac- and diverse constituencies within psychology compete cepted. Similarly, psychologists who provide therapy for APA’s limited resources. Yet, serving as “ a uniting are increasingly realizing that they are evidence-based force to the discipline” is a core component of APA’s interventions, not empirically-unsupportable theoreti- Vision statement. What can the APA President do to en- cal orientations. courage unity among all psychologists? One of the activities I cherished most when I served First, the APA President should be proud of psychol- as APA’s first general counsel was the drafting of friend ogy’s many facets and contributions; representing all of of the court (amicus)

Load more