DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning Applications Pdf 399 Kb

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planning Applications Pdf 399 Kb APPENDIX A KINGSTON TOWN PLANNING SUB COMMITTEE TUESDAY 10 SEPTEMBER 2013 REPORT BY HEAD OF PLANNING & TRANSPORT PLANNING APPLICATIONS INDEX ITEM REGISTER ADDRESS DESCRIPTION RECOMMENDATION PAGE NO NO NO A1 13/12422 295 Richmond Road, Kingston Demolition of the existing dwelling PERMIT A1 upon Thames, Surrey, KT2 5DJ house and garages and the erection of one pair of semi-detached houses, with associated landscaping, parking and refuse storage. A2 13/12424 217 Park Road, Kingston Upon Demolition of existing dwelling (217/219 PERMIT A16 Thames, KT2 5LE Park Road) and erection of a part two/part three storey dwelling with accommodation in the roofspace. A3 13/12492 52 Park Road, Kingston Upon Erection of single storey detached PERMIT A31 Thames, KT2 6AU outbuilding. A4 13/12508 Market House Market Place, Stone repairs and external redecoration PERMIT A39 Kingston upon Thames, works to external elevations. Kingston upon Thames, Surrey, KT1 1JS Report 294714 APPENDIX A KINGSTON TOWN PLANNING SUB COMMITTEE TUESDAY 10 SEPTEMBER 2013 REPORT BY HEAD OF PLANNING & TRANSPORT PLANNING APPLICATIONS INDEX ITEM REGISTER ADDRESS DESCRIPTION RECOMMENDATION PAGE NO NO NO A5 13/12542 94C Kings Road, Kingston upon Alterations to existing building, erection PERMIT A47 Thames, Surrey, KT2 5HT of single storey side, rear and front extensions and alterations to roof to facilitate loft conversion to create a 3 bedroom dwelling, as a variation to the sche me granted planning permission reference 12/12593/FUL. A6 13/12615 Car Park, Railway Wharf, Relocation of houseboat to temporary PERMIT A59 Thames Side, Kingston Upon mooring for a period of 7 months Thames (September 2013 - March 2014) Report 294714 KINGSTON TOWN PLANNING SUB COMMITTEE TUESDAY 10 SEPTEMBER 2013 REPORT BY THE HEAD OF PLANNING & TRANSPORT PLANNING APPLICATIONS All recommendations for planning permission in this section are automatically subject to the condition limiting the duration of the permission required by Sections 91 and 92 of the Town and Country Planning Act (as amended) 1990 unless permission is to be granted for a limited period or unless there is a specific recommendation that the period for such duration be other than the period referred to in the standard condition. All background papers are incorporated into Planning Application Reports. The policies listed are those from the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames the Local Development Framework Core Strategy, Adopted April 2012. Kingston Town Planning Sub Committee Date of Meeting: 10/09/2013 A1 Register No : 13/12422/FUL Address : 295 RICHMOND ROAD, KINGSTON UPON THAMES, SURREY, KT2 5DJ (c) Crown Copyright. All right reserved. Royal Borough of Kingston 2007. Licence number 100019285. [Please note that this plan is intended to assist in locating the development it is not the site plan of the proposed development which may have different boundaries. Please refer to the application documents for the proposed site boundaries.] Ward : Tudor Description of Proposal : Demolition of the existing dwellinghouse and garages and the erection of one pair of semi- detached houses, with associated landscaping, parking and refuse storage. Plan Type : Full Application Expiry Date : 23/07/2013 Applicant's Plan Nos : design and access statement-160513 Received 22/05/2013 PA-1 Received 22/05/2013 PA-10 Received 22/05/2013 PA-11 Received 22/05/2013 PA-12 Received 22/05/2013 PA-13 Received 22/05/2013 PA-14 Received 22/05/2013 PA-15 Received 22/05/2013 PA-16 Received 22/05/2013 PA-2 Received 22/05/2013 PA-3 Received 22/05/2013 PA-4 Received 22/05/2013 PA-4-A Received 22/05/2013 PA-5 Received 22/05/2013 PA-5 -A Received 22/05/2013 PA-6 Received 22/05/2013 PA-6-A Received 22/05/2013 PA-7 Received 22/05/2013 PA-7-A Received 22/05/2013 PA-8 Received 22/05/2013 PA-8-A Received 22/05/2013 PA-9 Received 22/05/2013 Sustainability Statement for Planning – Issued Received 22/05/2013 22 05 13 BASIC INFORMATION National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) 2012 Development Plan : London Plan July 2011 LDF Core Strategy Adopted April 2012 Policies LONDON PLAN JULY 2012 LP 3.3 Increasing housing supply LP 3.4 Optimising housing potential LP 3.5 Quality and design of housing development LP 3.8 Housing choice LP 6.13 Parking LP 6.9 Cycling LDF CORE STRATEGY CORE POLICIES CS 01 Climate Change Mitigation CS 02 Climate Change Adaptation CS 06 Sustainable Travel CS 07 Managing Vehicle Use CS 08 Character, Heritage and Design CS 10 Housing Delivery LDF CORE STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT DM01 Sustainable Design and Construction Stan DM08 Sustainable Transport for new Development DM09 Managing Vehicle Use for New Development DM10 Design Requirements for New Developments DM11 Design Approach DM13 Housing Quality and Mix LDF CORE STRATEGY IMPLEMENT POLICIES IMP3 Securing Infrastructure Previous Relevant History 11/12277/FUL Demolition of existing dwelling and Refuse Full erection of three storey building to Application provide 2 x 3 bedroom, 4 x 2 bedroom 27/07/2011 and 1 x 1 bedroom units 12/12422/FUL Demolition of existing property and Refused erection of 1x3 bedroom detached 15/08/2012, house and 2x3 bedroom semi-detached Appeal Dismissed houses. 24/04/2013 13/12086/FUL Demolition of the existing dwelling Application house and garages and the erection of Withdrawn two semi-detached houses, with 29/04/2013 associated landscaping, parking and refuse storage. Consultations 1. Neighbour Notification - 52 surrounding owner/occupiers have been consulted with 5 letters of objection received. Concerns raised include: (a) Highway safety with the proposed driveways near the junction of Lower Ham Road and Richmond Road with the entrance to the Hawker Centre. (b) Increase in traffic. (c) Overdevelopment of the site and loss of garden space. 2. Climate Change and Sustainability Officer - No objection, subject to conditions. 3. Neighbourhood Traffic Engineer - No objection, subject to conditions. Site and Surroundings 4. The application site is located on the corner of Richmond Road and Lower Ham Road. The site accommodates a two storey detached house which fronts, and relates most closely to, Lower Ham Road. The property has a 1.8 m close boarded fence around the majority of the site's boundary. 5. The surrounding section of Richmond Road is characterised by 1930's two storey semi-detached dwellings. There are also a few more recent infill developments along Richmond Road. The northern section of Lower Ham Road comprises two storey detached houses on narrow plots. To the west of the site is an area of Metropolitan Open Land (Hawker Centre). Proposal 6. The proposal relates to the demolition of the existing dwelling house and the erection of a pair of semi-detached dwelling houses (i.e. 2 dwelling houses). 7. One of the proposed dwellings would be 4 bedroom and the other 3 bedroom. Both dwellings would have the benefit of 2 off street parking spaces. 8. It should be noted that this application site has been subject to two recent planning applications and one appeal. 9. Planning application 11/12277/FUL was for the 'demolition of existing dwelling and erection of three storey building to provide 2 x 3 bedroom, 4 x 2 bedroom and 1 x 1 bedroom units'. This application was refused for the following reasons: (1) The proposed development, by virtue of its design, siting, layout and relationship with the adjoining properties and the streetscene, would have a detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the area. The proposal is contrary to Policies STR6, BE11 and BE12 of the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames Unitary Development Plan (First Alteration), Policies CS8, DM10, DM11 and DM13 of the LDF Core Strategy (Submission Draft May 2011), Policies 3A.3, 3A.6, 4B.1 and 4B.2 of The London Plan (Consolidated with Alterations since 2004) and Policies 3.4, 3.5, 7.1, 7.4 and 7.6 of The London Plan (Consultation Draft Replacement Plan October 2009). (2) The proposed development, by virtue of its scale and density, would result in an over-intensive and cramped form of development that would be inappropriate for, and out of character with, the surrounding area and detrimental to the amenities of the future occupiers. The proposal is contrary to Policies STR6, H1, BE11, BE12 and RES3 of the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames Unitary Development Plan (First Alteration), Policies CS8, DM10, DM11 and DM13 of the LDF Core Strategy (Submission Draft May 2011), Policies 3A.3, 3A.6, 4B.1 and 4B.2 of The London Plan (Consolidated with Alterations since 2004) and Policies 3.4, 3.5, 7.1, 7.4 and 7.6 of The London Plan (Consultation Draft Replacement Plan October 2009). (3) The proposal would fail to provide adequate amenity space for the size and type of dwellings proposed to the detriment of the living conditions of future occupiers. The proposal is contrary to Policies H1 and BE12 of the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames Unitary Development Plan (First Alteration) and Policy DM10 of the LDF Core Strategy (Submission Draft May 2011), Policy 3A.6 of The London Plan (Consolidated with Alterations since 2004) and Policy 3.5 of The London Plan (Consultation Draft Replacement Plan October 2009). 10. Planning application 12/12422/FUL was then submitted for 'Demolition of existing property and erection of 1x3 bedroom detached house and 2x3 bedroom semi-detached houses'. This application was refused for the following reasons: (1) The proposed development, by virtue of its design, scale, siting, layout and relationship with the adjoining properties and the streetscene, would have a detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the area.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HAMPTON WICK the Thames Landscape Strategy Review 2 2 7
    REACH 05 HAMPTON WICK The Thames Landscape Strategy Review 2 2 7 Landscape Character Reach No. 5 HAMPTON WICK 4.05.1 Overview 1994-2012 • Part redevelopment of the former Power Station site - refl ecting the pattern of the Kingston and Teddington reaches, where blocks of 5 storeys have been introduced into the river landscape. • A re-built Teddington School • Redevelopment of the former British Aerospace site next to the towpath, where the river end of the site is now a sports complex and community centre (The Hawker Centre). • Felling of a row of poplar trees on the former power station site adjacent to Canbury Gardens caused much controversy. • TLS funding bid to the Heritage Lottery Fund for enhancements to Canbury Gardens • Landscaping around Half Mile Tree has much improved the entrance to Kingston. • Construction of an upper path for cyclists and walkers between Teddington and Half Mile Tree • New visitor moorings as part of the Teddington Gateway project have enlivened the towpath route • Illegal moorings are increasingly a problem between Half Mile Tree and Teddington. • Half Mile Tree Enhancements 2007 • Timber-yards and boat-yards in Hampton Wick, the Power Station and British Aerospace in Kingston have disappeared and the riverside is more densely built up. LANDSCAPE CHARACTER 4.05.2 The Hampton Wick Reach curves from Kingston Railway Bridge to Teddington Lock. The reach is characterised by residential areas interspersed with recreation grounds. Yet despite tall apartment blocks at various locations on both banks dating from the last 30 years of the 20th century, the reach remains remarkably green and well-treed.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting to Know Your River
    Would you like to find out more about us, or about your environment? Then call us on 08708 506 506 (Mon-Fri 8-6) A user’s guide to the email River Thames enquiries@environment- agency.gov.uk or visit our website www.environment-agency.gov.uk incident hotline getting to know 0800 80 70 60 (24hrs) floodline 0845 988 1188 your river Environment first: This publication is printed on paper made from 100 per cent previously used waste. By-products from making the pulp and paper are used for composting and fertiliser, for making cement and for generating energy. GETH0309BPGK-E-P Welcome to the River Thames safe for the millions of people who use it, from anglers and naturalists to boaters, We are the Environment Agency, navigation authority for the River Thames walkers and cyclists. This leaflet is an essential guide to helping the wide variety from Lechlade to Teddington. We care for the river, keeping it clean, healthy and of users enjoy their activities in harmony. To help us maintain this harmony, please To encourage better understanding amongst river users, there are nine River User Groups (RUGs) read about activities other than your own covering the length of the river from Cricklade to to help you appreciate the needs of others. Tower Bridge. Members represent various river users, from clubs and sporting associations to commercial businesses. If you belong to a club that uses the river, encourage it to join the appropriate group. Contact your local waterway office for details. Find out more about the River Thames at www.visitthames.co.uk Before you go..
    [Show full text]
  • PORTSMOUTH ROAD the Thames Landscape Strategy Review 1 9 7
    REACH 03 PORTSMOUTH ROAD The Thames Landscape Strategy Review 1 9 7 Landscape Character Reach No 3 PORTSMOUTH ROAD 4.03.1 Overview 1994-2012 • Construction of new cycle/footpath along Barge Walk and the opening of views across the river • Habitat enhancement in the Home Park including restoration of acid grassland • Long-running planning process for the Seething Wells fi lter beds • TLS initiative to restore the historic Home Park water meadows. • RBKuT Kingston Town Centre Area Action Plan K+20 • RBK and TLS Integrated Moorings Business Plan • Management of riverside vegetation along the Barge Walk • Restoration of the Long Water Avenue in 2006 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER 4.03.2 The Portsmouth Road Reach runs north from Seething Wells up to Kingston. The reach has a character of wide open grassland, interrupted only by trees, park and water-works walls and the Portsmouth Road blocks of fl ats. Hampton Court Park extends over the entire Middlesex side right up to Hampton Wick, while the Surrey bank divides between the former Water Works and the Queen’s Promenade. The Portsmouth Road follows the river the length of the reach on the Surrey side. This is one of the only sections of the upstream London Thames where a road has been built alongside the river. The busy road and associated linear developments make a harsh contrast with the rhythm of parkland and historic town waterfronts which characterise the rest of the river. Portsmouth Road 4.03.3 Hampton Court Park is held in the circling sweep of the Thames, as its fl ow curves from south to north.
    [Show full text]
  • Kingston for the Many
    Kingston for the many Labour’s manifesto for Kingston’s local elections, 3 May 2018 Labour’s local election manifesto for Kingston 2018–2022 Contents Making Kingston a borough to be proud of ........................................................................ 4 Creating a fairer Kingston ............................................................................................... 5 Promoting Kingston’s economy ........................................................................................ 6 Brexit ........................................................................................................................ 6 Investment in Kingston ............................................................................................... 6 Retail centres in the borough........................................................................................ 7 Night-time economy .................................................................................................... 7 Getting people back to work ......................................................................................... 7 Training for work ........................................................................................................ 8 Fighting modern slavery .............................................................................................. 8 Affordable homes for the many ...................................................................................... 9 Introduction ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Teddington Reach Coordination, 2020
    TEDDINGTON REACH COORDINATION, 2020 May 2020 Note that many of the events in the calendar to date have not taken place and others in the future may also be cancelled because of restrictions imposed to protect against the Covid-19 virus. CONTENTS 1 – DEFINITIONS……………………………………………………………………………page 1-2 2 – PROGRAMME 2020..………………………………………………………………….pages 2-7 3 – REGULAR CLUB ACTIVITIES NOT INCLUDED ON REACH PROGRAMME, AND CLUB CONTACT DETAILS………page 8-11 1 – DEFINITIONS Times am events finish by 13.00 hours. pm events start on or after 13.00 hours Reach sections (Map to come in next draft) 1 Molesey Lock to Thames Ditton Island. 2 Thames Ditton Island to Raven’s Ait 3 Raven’s Ait to Kingston Bridge 4 Kingston Bridge to Steven’s Ait 5 Steven’s Ait to the inlet near the Royal Canoe Club 6 The inlet near the Royal Canoe Club to Broom Water 7 Broom Water to Teddington Lock Cut .Priority 1 River Closure means that the event is controlled by the EA ([email protected] ) and other clubs must not organise events at that time. River closures can only be applied between November and March. River Restriction means that the event is controlled by the EA ([email protected] ), the river is restricted and other clubs must not organise events in the restricted section at that time. Exclusive (Excl) means that other clubs participating in this Reach Coordination must not organise events at the same time. (When possible, sailing clubs are expected to offer races for all the classes sailing on the Reach.) Priority (Pri) means that the club has priority for its event and other clubs wishing to organise events on the same day MUST liaise with it prior to the event ON THE DAY OF THE EVENT in order to avoid clashes.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Reports Pack (Public) 09/06/2011, 19.30
    For enquiries on this agenda please contact David Maher 020 8547 5062 e-mail:[email protected] This agenda is available at: www.kingston.gov.uk/CommitteeMinutes 1 June 2011 A meeting of the DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE will be held at the Guildhall, Kingston upon Thames on THURSDAY 9 JUNE 2011 at 7:30 pm Members of the Committee Councillor Vicki Harris (Chair) Councillor Frances Moseley (Vice Chair) Councillor Geoff Austin Councillor David Cunningham Councillor David Ryder-Mills Councillor Ken Smith Councillor Chrissie Hitchcock Councillor Richard Hudson Councillor Malcolm Self EMERGENCY EVACUATION ARRANGEMENTS On hearing the alarm which is a loud siren please leave the building by the nearest available fire exit and assemble by the triangle at the front of the Guildhall. Anyone requiring assistance to evacuate the building should go to the refuge areas which are situated outside Committee Room 1 and the Mayor’s Parlour where you will be met by a member of the building management team and assisted from the building. SPEAKING ON A PLANNING APPLICATION, TREE PRESERVATION ORDER OR ENFORCEMENT CASE Applicants and objectors may speak on planning applications, enforcement action or tree preservation orders if they have: (a) previously responded to the consultation on an application; and (b) registered THREE days before the meeting to do so. Full details of the arrangements for speaking at the meeting can be found on page 3. Deadline for registering to speak at this meeting: 10:00am Tuesday 7 June 2011 . Contact - David Maher 020 8547 5062 e-mail:[email protected] about registering to speak.
    [Show full text]
  • Tls Review Report September
    3.0 RIVER THAMES INFRASTRUCTURE 3.1 This chapter forms a new section to the TLS Report bringing together new priorities such as ood risk management and River Thames Infrastructure. There is a range of signi cant changes to the strategic policy context for the TLS Hampton to Kew that has been introduced since 1994. The most important of these are: • A range of signi cant changes to the strategic policy context for the TLS Hampton to Kew has been introduced since 1994. The most important of these is The London Plan – in particular policies concerning climate change adaptation (Policies 5.10-5.15), designs on London (Policies 7.1-7.10) and the Blue Ribbon Network (Policies 7.24-7.30); Draft SPG London World Heritage Sites – Guidance on Settings • Thames Estuary 2100 – Consultation Document, Environment Agency, April 2009; • Lower Thames Flood Risk Management Strategy Consultation Document – Environment Agency September 2009; • Strategic Flood Risk Assessments • European Directives • River Basin Management Plan – Thames Basin District, Environment Agency and Defra, December 2009; • The Flood and Water Management Act 2010; • The Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA) was introduced in 1996.- • The original 1995 Act was modi ed and extended by the introduction of the Disability Discrimination Act 2005 in 2006. • Thames Waterway Plan 2006-2011 – River Thames Alliance RIVER FLOW AND TIDAL REGIME The Thames Basin 3.2 The River Thames rises near Kemble in Gloucestershire and drains a catchment of some 3,841 square miles. This large catchment of brooks, canals and rivers combine to form 38 main tributaries feeding the Thames between its source and Teddington Lock, the normal tidal limit.
    [Show full text]
  • A. the River As Commercial Waterway B. the River As One of London's Playgrounds C. the River As Water Provide
    23/09/2020 Survey 1930 Putney to Staines - WHERE THAMES SMOOTH WATERS GLIDE The Thames from Putney to Staines A Survey of the River, with Suggestions for the Preservation of its Amenities, prepared for A Joint Committee of the Middlesex and Surrey County Councils by Adams, Thompson and Fry, Town Planning Consultants 121 Victoria Street, Westminter, SW1 St Dominic’s Press Ditchling, Hassocks, Sussex 1930 Syon Reach CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION: A. THE RIVER AS COMMERCIAL WATERWAY B. THE RIVER AS ONE OF LONDON’S PLAYGROUNDS C. THE RIVER AS WATER PROVIDER D. THE RIVER AND LAND DRAINAGE E. THE RIVER BANKS AND BUILDINGS F. HOW AMENITIES MAY BE DESTROYED: a. Industrial Buildings and Public Works b. Bridges c. Domestic Buildings d. Advertisements e. Various causes of disfigurement and loss of amenity f. General attitude to the river https://thames.me.uk/Survey1930.htm 1/47 23/09/2020 Survey 1930 Putney to Staines - WHERE THAMES SMOOTH WATERS GLIDE II. A SURVEY OF THE RIVER WITH SUGGESTIONS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF ITS AMENITIES A. PUTNEY BRIDGE-HAMMERSMITH BRIDGE B. HAMMERSMITH BRIDGE-BARNES BRIDGE C. BARNES BRIDGE-KEW BRIDGE D. KEW BRIDGE-RICHMOND RAILWAY BRIDGE E. RICHMOND RAILWAY BRIDGE-BUCCLEUCH HOUSE F. BUCCLEUCH HOUSE-TEDDINGTON WEIR G. TEDDINGTON WEIR-KINGSTON BRIDGE H. KINGSTON BRIDGE-HAMPTON COURT BRIDGE I. [NB there is no I. section] J. HAMPTON COURT BRIDGE-SUNBURY WEIR K. SUNBURY WEIR-SHEPPERTON LOCK AND WEIRS L. SHEPPERTON LOCK-PENTON HOOK LOCK M. PENTON HOOK-STAINES BRIDGE III. METHODS OF PRESERVING THE AMENITIES OF THE RIVER SIDE A. OPEN SPACES a.
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Wharf, Down Hall Road, Kingston Upon Thames
    KINGSTON TOWN PLANNING SUB-COMMITTEE 4 JULY 2012 PLANNING CONSULTATION (11/12131/FUL): RAILWAY WHARF, DOWN HALL ROAD, KINGSTON UPON THAMES REPORT BY THE INTERIM HEAD OF PLANNING SUMMARY 1. This report seeks the Sub-Committee's views on application 11/12131/FUL for the permanent residential moorings for two boats prior to consideration of the application by the Development Control Committee. 2. This application was presented to the Kingston Town Planning Sub Committee on the 25 th May 2011 and was subsequently approved by the Development Control Committee on the 9 th June 2011. The decision was challenged by means of Judicial Review on the basis of a procedural matter, which was upheld, resulting in the decision on the planning application being quashed and leading to a requirement for the planning application to be reconsidered. 3. The application is still under consideration and although the period set aside for consultation responses has expired, some may still be received. Further information will be circulated to the Sub-Committee following an assessment upon the receipt of any further consultation responses. The proposal raises a number of considerations which are set out below in the main body of the report. RECOMMENDATION It is RECOMMENDED that the Sub-Committee express its views on the application so that the Development Control Committee can consider them when it determines this planning application. REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION To enable the Neighbourhood’s views to be considered SITE AND SURROUNDINGS 1. The application site concerns two moorings located to the north of and adjacent to Kingston Railway Bridge and the riverside car park off Down Hall Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Devizes to Westminster 2013 Day 1
    Devizes to Westminster 2013 Day 1: Devizes to Newbury 33.65 miles & 34 portages Time Start Finish Day Planned Latest Actual 0.0 125.0 Devizes Wharf: Start 33.7 09:30 09:30 0.2 124.8 Cemetry Road Bridge [No 140] 33.5 09:32 09:33 0.3 124.7 Park Road Bridge [No 139] 33.4 09:33 09:35 0.4 124.6 A361 London Road Bridge [No 138] 33.2 09:35 09:37 0.9 124.1 Brickham Bridge [No 137] 32.8 09:40 09:46 1.0 124.0 Coate Bridge [No 136] 32.7 09:41 09:47 1.8 123.2 Laywood Bridge [No 135] 31.9 09:50 10:02 2.6 122.5 Horton Bridge [No 134] 31.1 09:59 10:15 3.0 122.0 Bishops Cannings swing Bridge [No 133] 30.7 10:04 10:23 3.2 121.8 Horton Chain Bridge [No 132] 30.5 10:06 10:27 3.7 121.3 Horton Fields swing Bridge [No 131] 30.0 10:12 10:35 3.9 121.1 Allington Bridge [No 130] 29.8 10:15 10:39 5.5 119.5 Allington swing Bridge [No 129] 28.2 10:33 11:08 5.9 119.1 Woodway Bridge [No 128] 27.8 10:38 11:15 6.1 118.9 All Cannings Bridge [No 127] 27.6 10:39 11:18 6.9 118.1 England's Bridge [No 126] 26.8 10:49 11:33 7.3 117.7 Stanton Bridge [No 125] 26.4 10:54 11:40 7.9 117.1 Honey Street Bridge [No 124] 25.8 11:00 11:50 8.2 116.8 Alton Valley Bridge [No 123] 25.5 11:04 11:56 8.8 116.2 Woodborough Fields Bridge [No 122] 24.9 11:11 12:06 9.7 115.3 Lady's Bridge [No 120] 24.0 11:21 12:22 10.2 114.8 Bowdens Bridge [No 119] 23.5 11:27 12:31 10.4 114.6 Wilcot swing Bridge [No 118] 23.3 11:30 12:35 10.6 114.4 Wilcot Bridge [No 117] 23.0 11:32 12:39 10.9 114.1 Stowell Park Suspension Bridge [No 116] 22.8 11:35 12:44 11.2 113.8 Bristow Bridge [No 115] 22.5 11:39 12:49 11.8 113.3
    [Show full text]
  • Cruising Guide for the River Thames
    Cruising Guide to The River Thames and Connecting Waterways 2012-2013 Supported by Introduction and Contents As Chairman of BMF Thames Valley, I am immensely Introduction 3 proud to introduce the 2012/13 Cruising Guide to The River Thames Management 4-5 the River Thames and its connecting waterways. The Non-tidal River Thames 7-13 Cruising Guide has been jointly produced with the Environment Agency and is supported by the Port Bridge Heights - Non-tidal River Thames 14 of London Authority - it provides all the relevant St John’s Lock - Shifford Lock 15 information anyone would need whilst boating on Shifford Lock - Sandford Lock 16-17 The River Thames and its connecting waterways. Sandford Lock - Benson Lock 18-19 BMF Thames Valley is a Regional Association of the Cleeve Lock - Sonning Lock 20-21 British Marine Federation, the National trade association for the leisure boating industry. BMF Thames Valley Sonning Lock - Boulter’s Locks 22-23 represents around 200 businesses that all share a Boulter’s Lock - Old Windsor Lock 24-25 passion for our inland waterways. 2012 is going to be Bell Weir Lock - Shepperton Lock 26-27 an exciting year on the River Thames with the London Shepperton Lock - Teddington Lock 28-29 2012 Olympics and the Diamond Jubilee celebrations. What’s new for 2012! The Tidal Thames 30 • New map design Tidal Thames Cruising Times 31 • Complete map of navigable River Thames from Lechlade Teddington Lock - Vauxhall Bridge 32-33 to the Thames Barrier • Information on the non-tidal Thames - Environment Agency Lambeth Bridge
    [Show full text]
  • River Thames Handbook
    River Thames Handbook NRA National R irei A u l hom y Tha mei Region he National Rivers Authority, opportunity to enjoy their activity, Thames Region, encourages without impairing the enjoyment of 7the pursuit of a variety of recreationalothers. activities along the 136 miles of the This booklet aims to help freshwater River Thames for which everyone to co n d u ct the ir ow n it is the m a n a g in g authority. activity in safety and to foster good It must cater for:- relations and a spirit o f Anglers, Boating enthusiasts, understanding amongst all river Canoeists, Dinghy sailors and users b y explaining the needs and Yachtsmen, Holidaymakers in hired limitations of each different activity. craft, Naturalists, Oarsmen, Swimmers Please read the sections about and Sub-aqua divers and Walkers. activities other than your own since With so many interests competing this will help you to appreciate the for space, is the River large enough problems of others. to a cco m m o d a te them all without Nine River User Groups have conflict and risk to personal safety? been established to encourage The answer is yes-provided that better understanding amongst all river users are safety conscious rivers users. Between them they and practise good river manners. cover the length of the Thames, The NRA, Thames Region’s job is to including the tidal section between ensure everyone has an equal Teddington and Tower Bridge which CONTENTS falls under the navigational control GENERAL GUIDANCE NOTES 4 of the Port of London Authority.
    [Show full text]