DOCSLIB.ORG

Applicant Document Pack for a Licensing Sub Committee Hearing Tuesday 22Nd October 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Applicant Document Pack for a Licensing Sub Committee Hearing Tuesday 22Nd October 2019 Joshua Simons & Associates Applicant document pack for a licensing sub committee hearing Tuesday 22nd October 2019. McDonald’s – 83 Eden Street, Kingston KT1 1DJ. This pack has been compiled and issued by Joshua Simons and Associates on behalf of the applicant MJ Restaurants in the matter of a new application for a premises licence for Mc Donalds Kingston 83 Eden Street. Page 1 Index Section Document title Page number/s 1 Witness statement of Mike Smith (for MJ 4-13 Restaurants the applicant). 2 Licensing Impact report by Dave Gair Shield 15-27 Associates 3 Key Differences Table for Quick Service 29-32 Restaurants/Takeaway premises 4 National Rail & tfl Bus Route Maps 34-34 5 Tfl taxi rank booklet (abridged) 36-43 6 Compliance Survey Audit Report Shield Associates 45-48 Page 2 Joshua Simons & Associates Witness statement of Mike Smith Page 3 Witness Statement of Mike Smith Director of MJ Restaurants Ltd -(Premises Licence Holder/Applicant) The application 1. I Mike Smith am the majority shareholder and director of MJ Restaurants Ltd, a franchise company that is authorised to trade as McDonald’s Restaurants. I make this statement in support on my application to apply for a new premises licence for the provision of late night refreshment from 23:00 – 00:00 Sundays to Thursdays and 23:00 – 02:00 on Fridays and Saturdays. 2. This is an application for a new premises licence. It is proposed to surrender the existing premises licence PL0647 which has the retail sale of alcohol included on the licence if this application is granted favourably. Background and purpose of application 3. The company that holds the franchise is a professional and responsible operator with over eighteen years’ experience of operating McDonald’s franchises. The company currently operate twelve McDonald’s restaurants in London and the South-East. Many of these are in residential areas. Some are in busy town centre locations very similar to Kingston Town Centre and face the same challenges associated with running late night refreshment premises in a town centre where commercial and residential premises adjoin each other. Two of my McDonald’s restaurants, in Surbiton and Catford, operate for 24 hours. They all operate well. That is by design of these restaurants and the organisation and procedures of my company rather than accident. 4. As the franchisee I have a detailed understanding of the premises, its Page 4 operating and security procedures, the local area and methods to deter anti- social behaviour around the premises. The concerns expressed in the objections to this application are also my own concerns. For the good of my business and staff I too wish to avoid anti-social behaviour and drunk people visiting my restaurant – not least because that deters other customers, demoralises staff and so is very bad for business. This, I respectfully suggest, is achieved by proper management of the premises, rather than the somewhat unimaginative approach suggested by the objectors of simply refusing the grant of extended hours. The latter approach prevents me from carrying on a lawful business that provides a service to those who live and work in the vicinity. 5. The reason for this application to extend hours is simple: it will enable us to serve our customers those who are already in Kingston Town Centre (key shift workers and those from other late night premises) better by meeting their demands for the provision of late night refreshment in a controlled and regulated environment in Mc Donald’s Kingston. 6. We are not seeking to attract unruly or drunk people to our restaurant. Experience has shown that customers who wish to use our restaurant during the late night/early morning hours are primarily shift workers and those persons already in Kingston town centre wanting to enjoy a good value meal in a warm, safe and hygienic modern environment. McDonald’s in Kingston provides that option. A good number of our customers work in the emergency services. These include doctors, nurses, ambulance drivers, hospital support staff, and police officers. Unsurprisingly, Saturday and Sunday early mornings are the busiest nights for these emergency workers which is why we have focused on these nights. 7. But at present, on Friday and Saturday nights, we have to stop serving them at 00:00hrs. My staff are constantly having to turn away customers who simply do not understand why a McDonald’s that operates well until 00:00hrs cannot be trusted to open until 02:00hrs on a Friday and Saturdays. Page 5 Evidence of safe operation of site during extended hours 8. My confidence in the assertion that this site can operate well and promote the licensing objectives - even if it is permitted to open until 02:00hrs on Friday and Saturday - is not based on conjecture but rather on experience and fact: a) Firstly, I have operated similar McDonald’s restaurants in similar locations to this hour without significant issues. b) Secondly, and most importantly, I have operated to 02:00hrs at the Kingston site over 6 weekends 17, 24 Nov, 9,10, 23, 24 Feb, 9, 10, 23, 24 March 2019 under Temporary Events Notices without a licensing issue occurring during these extended hours. There was no reported increase in crime, disorder, or nuisance issues associated with my restaurant during these trial weekends. The police were aware that we were open late on these nights. This is the best evidence available to demonstrate that this proposal – in the real world – can work well without undermining the licensing objectives. c) A former Chief Inspector of Police, Mr David Gair, who observed two of these extended nights at the Kingston restaurant, has confirmed that – despite the issues raised by Kingston police and Environmental health officer - the reality of the situation is that the venue operates safely and well during the extended hours. 9. Prior to the application being submitted I instructed a firm of licensing consultants to set up a pre application enquiry with two responsible authorities Kingston Metropolitan Police Service and Kingston environmental health services. The idea was to understand the statement of licensing policy and in particular the issue of cumulative impact in relation to the proposal to extend late night refreshment, what issues there could be from extended opening Page 6 hours in relation to crime and disorder and public nuisance. Various meetings were held and the proposal along with a schedule of control measures was assessed prior to being included in this application for a premises licence. I can say that we have followed home office guidance at section 182 to ensure the proposed application does not affect or add to cumulative impact within Kingston Town Centre. Operating measures to promote the licensing objectives 10. Security Personnel –The premise currently has 1 x SIA security personnel on a Friday night and Saturdays mornings evenings and Sunday mornings. I propose to provide 2 SIA guards from 8pm until 15 minutes after the close of the premises within the operating schedule on Friday and Saturdays into Sunday mornings. This SIA provision should enable the entrance and inside of the premises to be visibly secured as well as re-assure customers and Mc Donald’s staff. 11. Street Marshall Staff - In addition to the provision of security personnel I would agree to deploy a street marshal on Fri Sat Sunday mornings outside the front of the premises. Although a street marshal will not provide any security functions they can provide an early warning system if there are issues outside of the premises. A street marshal shall also provide a visual presence to deal with public nuisance issues for example litter, delivery drivers, any loitering from customers. A street marshal will be equipped with a high visibility orange tabard or jacket to define them from SIA security personnel and a body camera for their safety. 12. Staff Safe – This is a system unique to Mc Donald’s Kingston that provides both video and audio monitoring capabilities and is activated by either fixed panic buttons in the restaurant or mobile panic buttons that are worn by managers. The benefits of the system are that it links McDonald’s Kingston to an external monitoring station managed by an alarm response company Page 7 called Positive Response UK Ltd who can intervene in a situation by interacting with a perpetrator via the restaurant’s music system loud speakers to attempt to resolve crime and disorder or public nuisance issues by providing the appropriate warning, advice and instruction to support and protect staff and customers. This system permits the monitoring company to hear what is occurring in the restaurant. The duty manager can also relay information to the operator directly. This enables the security operator at the monitoring centre to speak directly with the duty manager and perpetrator/s. Since its installation StaffSafe™ has been activated once during extended opening timings, and this was only an activation of the anti-social behaviour message and was not used to summon external assistance. I am not aware that this system is adopted by any other quick service takeaways named in the ‘Key Differences Document’ located within Kingston Town Centre. Staffsafe is an effective crime prevention, reduction and intervention system. I am able to confirm that all managers are trained in the use of the Staff Safe system. I can also confirm that the system was not required to be used during any of the temporary event notices. 13. Conflict Management Training –: This is a licensed product provided by MAYBO the UK leader in conflict management training programmes with this course being accredited by the Security Industry Authority (SIA).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HAMPTON WICK the Thames Landscape Strategy Review 2 2 7
    REACH 05 HAMPTON WICK The Thames Landscape Strategy Review 2 2 7 Landscape Character Reach No. 5 HAMPTON WICK 4.05.1 Overview 1994-2012 • Part redevelopment of the former Power Station site - refl ecting the pattern of the Kingston and Teddington reaches, where blocks of 5 storeys have been introduced into the river landscape. • A re-built Teddington School • Redevelopment of the former British Aerospace site next to the towpath, where the river end of the site is now a sports complex and community centre (The Hawker Centre). • Felling of a row of poplar trees on the former power station site adjacent to Canbury Gardens caused much controversy. • TLS funding bid to the Heritage Lottery Fund for enhancements to Canbury Gardens • Landscaping around Half Mile Tree has much improved the entrance to Kingston. • Construction of an upper path for cyclists and walkers between Teddington and Half Mile Tree • New visitor moorings as part of the Teddington Gateway project have enlivened the towpath route • Illegal moorings are increasingly a problem between Half Mile Tree and Teddington. • Half Mile Tree Enhancements 2007 • Timber-yards and boat-yards in Hampton Wick, the Power Station and British Aerospace in Kingston have disappeared and the riverside is more densely built up. LANDSCAPE CHARACTER 4.05.2 The Hampton Wick Reach curves from Kingston Railway Bridge to Teddington Lock. The reach is characterised by residential areas interspersed with recreation grounds. Yet despite tall apartment blocks at various locations on both banks dating from the last 30 years of the 20th century, the reach remains remarkably green and well-treed.
    [Show full text]
  • E Historic Maps and Plans
    E Historic Maps and Plans Contains 12 Pages Map 1a: 1771 ‘Plan of the Royal Manor of Richmond’ by Burrell and Richardson. Map 1b: Extract of 1771 ‘Plan of the Royal Manor of Richmond’ by Burrell and Richardson. Map 2. 1837 ‘Royal Gardens, View’ Map 3. 1861-1871 1st Edition Ordnance Survey map Map 4. c.1794 ‘A Plan of Richmond and Kew Gardens’ Map 5. 1844 ‘Sketch plan of the ground attached to the proposed Palm House at Kew and also for the Pleasure Ground - showing the manner in which a National Arboretum may be formed without materially altering the general features’ by Nesfield. Map 6. ‘Royal Botanic Gardens: The dates and extent of successive additions to the Royal Gardens from their foundation in 1760 (9 acres) to the present time (288 acres)’ Illustration 1. 1763 ‘A View of the Lake and Island, with the Orangerie, the Temples of Eolus and Bellona, and the House of Confucius’ by William Marlow Illustration 2. ‘A Perspective View of the Palace from the Northside of the Lake, the Green House and the Temple of Arethusa, in the Royal Gardens at Kew’ by William Woollett Illustration 3. c.1750 ‘A view of the Palace from the Lawn in the Royal Gardens at Kew’ by James Roberts Illustration 4. Great Palm House, Kew Gardens Illustration 5. Undated ‘Kew Palace and Gardens’ May 2018 Proof of Evidence: Historic Environment Kew Curve-PoE_Apps_Final_05-18-AC Chris Blandford Associates Map 1a: 1771 ‘Plan of the Royal Manor of Richmond’ by Burrell and Richardson. Image courtesy of RBGK Archive is plan shows the two royal gardens st before gsta died in 1 and aer eorge had inherited ichmond Kew ardens have been completed by gsta and in ichmond apability rown has relandscaped the park for eorge e high walls of ove ane are still in place dividing the two gardens May 2018 Appendix E AppE-L.indd MAP 1a 1 Map 1b: Extract of 1771 ‘Plan of the Royal Manor of Richmond’ by Burrell and Richardson.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting to Know Your River
    Would you like to find out more about us, or about your environment? Then call us on 08708 506 506 (Mon-Fri 8-6) A user’s guide to the email River Thames enquiries@environment- agency.gov.uk or visit our website www.environment-agency.gov.uk incident hotline getting to know 0800 80 70 60 (24hrs) floodline 0845 988 1188 your river Environment first: This publication is printed on paper made from 100 per cent previously used waste. By-products from making the pulp and paper are used for composting and fertiliser, for making cement and for generating energy. GETH0309BPGK-E-P Welcome to the River Thames safe for the millions of people who use it, from anglers and naturalists to boaters, We are the Environment Agency, navigation authority for the River Thames walkers and cyclists. This leaflet is an essential guide to helping the wide variety from Lechlade to Teddington. We care for the river, keeping it clean, healthy and of users enjoy their activities in harmony. To help us maintain this harmony, please To encourage better understanding amongst river users, there are nine River User Groups (RUGs) read about activities other than your own covering the length of the river from Cricklade to to help you appreciate the needs of others. Tower Bridge. Members represent various river users, from clubs and sporting associations to commercial businesses. If you belong to a club that uses the river, encourage it to join the appropriate group. Contact your local waterway office for details. Find out more about the River Thames at www.visitthames.co.uk Before you go..
    [Show full text]
  • PORTSMOUTH ROAD the Thames Landscape Strategy Review 1 9 7
    REACH 03 PORTSMOUTH ROAD The Thames Landscape Strategy Review 1 9 7 Landscape Character Reach No 3 PORTSMOUTH ROAD 4.03.1 Overview 1994-2012 • Construction of new cycle/footpath along Barge Walk and the opening of views across the river • Habitat enhancement in the Home Park including restoration of acid grassland • Long-running planning process for the Seething Wells fi lter beds • TLS initiative to restore the historic Home Park water meadows. • RBKuT Kingston Town Centre Area Action Plan K+20 • RBK and TLS Integrated Moorings Business Plan • Management of riverside vegetation along the Barge Walk • Restoration of the Long Water Avenue in 2006 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER 4.03.2 The Portsmouth Road Reach runs north from Seething Wells up to Kingston. The reach has a character of wide open grassland, interrupted only by trees, park and water-works walls and the Portsmouth Road blocks of fl ats. Hampton Court Park extends over the entire Middlesex side right up to Hampton Wick, while the Surrey bank divides between the former Water Works and the Queen’s Promenade. The Portsmouth Road follows the river the length of the reach on the Surrey side. This is one of the only sections of the upstream London Thames where a road has been built alongside the river. The busy road and associated linear developments make a harsh contrast with the rhythm of parkland and historic town waterfronts which characterise the rest of the river. Portsmouth Road 4.03.3 Hampton Court Park is held in the circling sweep of the Thames, as its fl ow curves from south to north.
    [Show full text]
  • The Diary of Heinrich Witt
    The Diary of Heinrich Witt Volume 2 Edited by Ulrich Mücke LEIDEN | BOSTON Ulrich Muecke - 9789004307247 Downloaded from Brill.com10/10/2021 09:30:38PM via free access [1] [2] Volume the second Commenced in Lima October the 9th 1867 Tuesday, 24th of January 1843. At 10 Oclock a.m. I started for Mr. Schutte’s silver mine of Orcopampa, my party was rather numerous; it consisted of course of myself on mule back with a led beast for change, the muleteer Delgado, his lad Mateo, both mounted, an Indian guide on foot named Condor, and seven mules laden with various articles for the mine as well as some provisions for myself, two or three fowls, half a sheep, potatoes, bread, salt, and sugar, also some sperm candles, and a metal candlestick. The mules carried each a load from eight to nine arrobes, besides four arrobes the weight of the gear and trappings. I may as well say en passant that I carried the above various articles of food because I had been assured that on this route I should find few eatables. I, accustomed to the ways and habits of the Sierra, saw nothing particular in the costume of my companion, nevertheless I will describe it, the muleteers wore ordinary woollen trowsers, and jackets, a woollen poncho over the shoulders, Chilian boots to the legs, shoes to their feet, but with only a single spur, on the principle that if one side of the animal moved the other could not be left behind; their head covering was a Guayaquil straw hat, underneath it Delgado wore a woollen cap, also round his neck a piece [_] jerga, for the purpose of blind folding his beasts when loading [_] a second piece round his waist the two ends of which [_] [3] and preserved his trowsers.
    [Show full text]
  • Kingston for the Many
    Kingston for the many Labour’s manifesto for Kingston’s local elections, 3 May 2018 Labour’s local election manifesto for Kingston 2018–2022 Contents Making Kingston a borough to be proud of ........................................................................ 4 Creating a fairer Kingston ............................................................................................... 5 Promoting Kingston’s economy ........................................................................................ 6 Brexit ........................................................................................................................ 6 Investment in Kingston ............................................................................................... 6 Retail centres in the borough........................................................................................ 7 Night-time economy .................................................................................................... 7 Getting people back to work ......................................................................................... 7 Training for work ........................................................................................................ 8 Fighting modern slavery .............................................................................................. 8 Affordable homes for the many ...................................................................................... 9 Introduction ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • London Transport Records at the Public Record Office
    CONTENTS Introduction Page 4 Abbreviations used in this book Page 3 Accidents on the London Underground Page 4 Staff Records Pages 6-7 PART A - List of former ‘British Transport Historical Records’ related to London Transport, which have been transferred to the Greater London Record Office - continued from Part One (additional notes regarding this location) Page 8 PART C - List of former ‘British Transport Historical Records’ related to London Transport, which are still at the Public Record Office - continued from Part One Pages 9-12 PART D - Other records related to London Transport including Government Departments - continued from Part One Pages 13-66 PART E - List of former ‘Department of Education and Science’ records transferred from the PRO to the Victoria & Albert Museum Pages 67 APPENDIX 1 - PRO Class AN2 Pages to follow APPENDIX 2 - PRO Class MT29 Page 51- (on disc) APPENDIX 3 - Other places which have LT related records Pages 68-71 PRO document class headings: AH (Location of Offices Bureau) Page 13 AN (Railway Executive Committee/BTC/British Railways Board) - continued from Part One Pages 14-26 AN2 (Railway Executive Committee, War of 1939. Records cover period from 1939-1947) Pages to follow AT (Department of the Environment and Predecessors) Page 27 AVIA (Ministry of Aviation/Ministry of Aircraft Production) Page 27 AY (Records of various research institutes) Page 27 BL (Council on Tribunals) Page 27 BT (Board of Trade) - continued from Part One Page 28-34 CAB (Cabinet Papers) Page 35-36 CK (Commission for Racial Equality/Race
    [Show full text]
  • Teddington Reach Coordination, 2020
    TEDDINGTON REACH COORDINATION, 2020 May 2020 Note that many of the events in the calendar to date have not taken place and others in the future may also be cancelled because of restrictions imposed to protect against the Covid-19 virus. CONTENTS 1 – DEFINITIONS……………………………………………………………………………page 1-2 2 – PROGRAMME 2020..………………………………………………………………….pages 2-7 3 – REGULAR CLUB ACTIVITIES NOT INCLUDED ON REACH PROGRAMME, AND CLUB CONTACT DETAILS………page 8-11 1 – DEFINITIONS Times am events finish by 13.00 hours. pm events start on or after 13.00 hours Reach sections (Map to come in next draft) 1 Molesey Lock to Thames Ditton Island. 2 Thames Ditton Island to Raven’s Ait 3 Raven’s Ait to Kingston Bridge 4 Kingston Bridge to Steven’s Ait 5 Steven’s Ait to the inlet near the Royal Canoe Club 6 The inlet near the Royal Canoe Club to Broom Water 7 Broom Water to Teddington Lock Cut .Priority 1 River Closure means that the event is controlled by the EA ([email protected] ) and other clubs must not organise events at that time. River closures can only be applied between November and March. River Restriction means that the event is controlled by the EA ([email protected] ), the river is restricted and other clubs must not organise events in the restricted section at that time. Exclusive (Excl) means that other clubs participating in this Reach Coordination must not organise events at the same time. (When possible, sailing clubs are expected to offer races for all the classes sailing on the Reach.) Priority (Pri) means that the club has priority for its event and other clubs wishing to organise events on the same day MUST liaise with it prior to the event ON THE DAY OF THE EVENT in order to avoid clashes.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Reports Pack (Public) 09/06/2011, 19.30
    For enquiries on this agenda please contact David Maher 020 8547 5062 e-mail:[email protected] This agenda is available at: www.kingston.gov.uk/CommitteeMinutes 1 June 2011 A meeting of the DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE will be held at the Guildhall, Kingston upon Thames on THURSDAY 9 JUNE 2011 at 7:30 pm Members of the Committee Councillor Vicki Harris (Chair) Councillor Frances Moseley (Vice Chair) Councillor Geoff Austin Councillor David Cunningham Councillor David Ryder-Mills Councillor Ken Smith Councillor Chrissie Hitchcock Councillor Richard Hudson Councillor Malcolm Self EMERGENCY EVACUATION ARRANGEMENTS On hearing the alarm which is a loud siren please leave the building by the nearest available fire exit and assemble by the triangle at the front of the Guildhall. Anyone requiring assistance to evacuate the building should go to the refuge areas which are situated outside Committee Room 1 and the Mayor’s Parlour where you will be met by a member of the building management team and assisted from the building. SPEAKING ON A PLANNING APPLICATION, TREE PRESERVATION ORDER OR ENFORCEMENT CASE Applicants and objectors may speak on planning applications, enforcement action or tree preservation orders if they have: (a) previously responded to the consultation on an application; and (b) registered THREE days before the meeting to do so. Full details of the arrangements for speaking at the meeting can be found on page 3. Deadline for registering to speak at this meeting: 10:00am Tuesday 7 June 2011 . Contact - David Maher 020 8547 5062 e-mail:[email protected] about registering to speak.
    [Show full text]
  • Tls Review Report September
    3.0 RIVER THAMES INFRASTRUCTURE 3.1 This chapter forms a new section to the TLS Report bringing together new priorities such as ood risk management and River Thames Infrastructure. There is a range of signi cant changes to the strategic policy context for the TLS Hampton to Kew that has been introduced since 1994. The most important of these are: • A range of signi cant changes to the strategic policy context for the TLS Hampton to Kew has been introduced since 1994. The most important of these is The London Plan – in particular policies concerning climate change adaptation (Policies 5.10-5.15), designs on London (Policies 7.1-7.10) and the Blue Ribbon Network (Policies 7.24-7.30); Draft SPG London World Heritage Sites – Guidance on Settings • Thames Estuary 2100 – Consultation Document, Environment Agency, April 2009; • Lower Thames Flood Risk Management Strategy Consultation Document – Environment Agency September 2009; • Strategic Flood Risk Assessments • European Directives • River Basin Management Plan – Thames Basin District, Environment Agency and Defra, December 2009; • The Flood and Water Management Act 2010; • The Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA) was introduced in 1996.- • The original 1995 Act was modi ed and extended by the introduction of the Disability Discrimination Act 2005 in 2006. • Thames Waterway Plan 2006-2011 – River Thames Alliance RIVER FLOW AND TIDAL REGIME The Thames Basin 3.2 The River Thames rises near Kemble in Gloucestershire and drains a catchment of some 3,841 square miles. This large catchment of brooks, canals and rivers combine to form 38 main tributaries feeding the Thames between its source and Teddington Lock, the normal tidal limit.
    [Show full text]
  • A. the River As Commercial Waterway B. the River As One of London's Playgrounds C. the River As Water Provide
    23/09/2020 Survey 1930 Putney to Staines - WHERE THAMES SMOOTH WATERS GLIDE The Thames from Putney to Staines A Survey of the River, with Suggestions for the Preservation of its Amenities, prepared for A Joint Committee of the Middlesex and Surrey County Councils by Adams, Thompson and Fry, Town Planning Consultants 121 Victoria Street, Westminter, SW1 St Dominic’s Press Ditchling, Hassocks, Sussex 1930 Syon Reach CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION: A. THE RIVER AS COMMERCIAL WATERWAY B. THE RIVER AS ONE OF LONDON’S PLAYGROUNDS C. THE RIVER AS WATER PROVIDER D. THE RIVER AND LAND DRAINAGE E. THE RIVER BANKS AND BUILDINGS F. HOW AMENITIES MAY BE DESTROYED: a. Industrial Buildings and Public Works b. Bridges c. Domestic Buildings d. Advertisements e. Various causes of disfigurement and loss of amenity f. General attitude to the river https://thames.me.uk/Survey1930.htm 1/47 23/09/2020 Survey 1930 Putney to Staines - WHERE THAMES SMOOTH WATERS GLIDE II. A SURVEY OF THE RIVER WITH SUGGESTIONS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF ITS AMENITIES A. PUTNEY BRIDGE-HAMMERSMITH BRIDGE B. HAMMERSMITH BRIDGE-BARNES BRIDGE C. BARNES BRIDGE-KEW BRIDGE D. KEW BRIDGE-RICHMOND RAILWAY BRIDGE E. RICHMOND RAILWAY BRIDGE-BUCCLEUCH HOUSE F. BUCCLEUCH HOUSE-TEDDINGTON WEIR G. TEDDINGTON WEIR-KINGSTON BRIDGE H. KINGSTON BRIDGE-HAMPTON COURT BRIDGE I. [NB there is no I. section] J. HAMPTON COURT BRIDGE-SUNBURY WEIR K. SUNBURY WEIR-SHEPPERTON LOCK AND WEIRS L. SHEPPERTON LOCK-PENTON HOOK LOCK M. PENTON HOOK-STAINES BRIDGE III. METHODS OF PRESERVING THE AMENITIES OF THE RIVER SIDE A. OPEN SPACES a.
    [Show full text]
  • Bushy Park Gardens Conservation Area No.77
    CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL LONDON BOROUGH OF RICHMOND UPON THAMES BUSHY PARK GARDENS CONSERVATION AREA NO.77 Consultation Draft, November 2020 Note: Every effort has been made interest. Therefore, the omission of any a more detailed and up-to-date to ensure the accuracy of this feature does not necessarily convey assessment of a particular site and its document but due to the complexity a lack of significance. The Council will context is undertaken. This may reveal of conservation areas, it would be continue to assess each development additional considerations relating to impossible to include every facet proposal on its own merits, on a site- character or appearance which may be BUSHY PARK GARDENS contributing to the area’s special specific basis. As part of this process, of relevance to a particular case. 1 CONSERVATION AREA No.77 CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL LONDON BOROUGH OF RICHMOND UPON THAMES Introduction PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT The principal aims of conservation • Raise public interest and This document has been area appraisals are to: awareness of the special produced using the guidance set character of their area; out by Historic England in the 2019 • Describe the historic and publication titled Understanding architectural character and • Identify the positive features Place: Conservation Area appearance of the area which should be conserved, Designation, Appraisal and which will assist applicants in as well as negative features Management, Historic England making successful planning which indicate scope for future Advice Note 1 (Second Edition). applications and decision enhancements. makers in assessing planning This document will be a material applications; consideration when assessing planning applications.
    [Show full text]