DOCSLIB.ORG

Freud. Bibliography (Full)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Freud. Bibliography (Full) Freud. Bibliography (Full) Freud, S. (1886). Observation severe case of hemi-anaesthesia in hysterical male., S.E., 1:23-34. Freud, S. (1886). Preface: Charcot's "Lectures on Diseases of Nervous System".., S.E., 1:17-22. Freud, S. (1887). Review of Averbeck's "Acute Neurasthenia"., S.E., 1:35-35. Freud, S. (1887). Review: S. W. Mitchell's "Treatment of Neurasthenia and Hysteria".., S.E., 1:36- 36. Freud, S. (1888). Hysteria, S. E., 1:37-57. Freud, S. (1889). Review of August Forel's "Hypnotism"., S.E., 1:89-102. Freud, S. (1890). Psychical (or mental) treatment., S.E., 7:283-302. Freud, S. (1891). Hypnosis., S.E., 1:103-114. Freud, S. (1892). A case of successful treatment by hypnotism., S.E., 1:115-128. Freud, S. (1892). Preface and footnotes: translation Charcot's "Tuesday Lectures".., S.E., 1:129- 146. Freud, S. (1893). A comparative study of organic and hysterical motor paralyses.., S.E., 1:155-172. Freud, S. (1893). Charcot., S.E., 3:7-24. Freud, S. (1893). On the psychical mechanism of hysterical phenomena: a lecture., S.E., 3:27-39. Freud, S. (1894). The neuro-psychoses of defence., S.E., 3:45-61. Freud, S. (1895). A reply to criticisms of my paper on anxiety neurosis., S.E., 3:121-139. Freud, S. (1895). Detaching syndrome of anxiety neurosis from neurasthenia.., S.E., 3:87-115. Freud, S. (1895). Obsessions and phobias., S.E., 3:74-82. Freud, S. (1896). Further remarks on the neuro-psychoses of defence., S.E., 3:162-185. Freud, S. (1896). Heredity and the aetiology of the neuroses., S.E., 3:143-156. Freud, S. (1896). The aetiology of hysteria., S.E., 3:191-221. Freud, S. (1897). Abstracts of the scientific writings of Dr. Sigm. Freud 1877-97., S.E., 3:223-258. Freud, S. (1898). Sexuality in the aetiology of the neuroses., S.E., 3:263-285. Freud, S. (1898). The psychical mechanism of forgetfulness., S.E., 3:289-297. Freud, S. (1899). Screen memories., S.E., 3:303-322. Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. Part I., S.E., 4:1-338. Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. Part II., S.E., 5:339-625. Freud, S. (1901). On dreams., S.E., 5:631-714. Freud, S. (1901). The psychopathology of everyday life., S.E., 6:1-290. Freud, S. (1903). Contributions to the "Neue Freie Presse"., S.E., 9:253-256. Freud, S. (1904). Freud's psycho-analytic procedure., S.E., 7:249-254. Freud, S. (1905). Fragment of an analysis of a case of hysteria., S.E., 7:7-122. Freud, S. (1905). Jokes and their relation to the unconscious., S.E., 8:9-236. Freud, S. (1905). On psychotherapy., S.E., 7:257-268. Freud, S. (1905). Three essays on the theory of sexuality., S.E., 7:130-243. Freud, S. (1906). Obsessive actions and religious practices., S.E., 9:117-127. Freud, S. (1906). Preface to Freud's shorter writings, 1893-1906., S.E., 3:1-6. Freud, S. (1906). Psycho-analysis and establishment of facts in legal proceedings.., S.E., 9:97- 114. Freud, S. (1906). The part played by sexuality in the aetiology of the neuroses.., S.E., 7:271-279. Freud, S. (1906). The sexual enlightenment of children., S.E., 9:131-139. Freud, S. (1907). Contribution to a questionnaire on reading., S.E., 9:245-247. Freud, S. (1907). Delusions and dreams in Jensen's "Gradiva"., S.E., 9:7-95. Freud, S. (1907). Prospectus for "Papers on Applied Mental Science"., S.E., 9:248-249. Freud, S. (1908). 'Civilized' sexual morality and modern nervous illness., S.E., 9:181-204. Freud, S. (1908). Character and anal erotism., S.E., 9:169-175. Freud, S. (1908). Creative writers and day-dreaming., S.E., 9:143-153. Freud, S. (1908). Hysterical phantasies and their relation to bisexuality., S.E., 9:155-166. Freud, S. (1908). On the sexual theories of children., S.E., 9:207-226. Freud, S. (1908). Preface: Stekel's "Nervous anxiety-states and their treatment".., S.E., 9:250- 251. Freud, S. (1909). Analysis of a phobia in a five-year-old boy., S.E., 10:5-149. Freud, S. (1909). Family romances., S.E., 9:235-244. Freud, S. (1909). Notes upon a case of obsessional neurosis., S.E., 10:155-318. Freud, S. (1909). Preface: Ferenczi's "Psycho-Analysis: Essays in Psycho-Analysis".., S.E., 9:252-252. Freud, S. (1909). Some general remarks on hysterical attacks., S.E., 9:229-234. Freud, S. (1910). 'Wild' psycho-analysis., S.E., 11:221-227. Freud, S. (1910). A special type of choice of object made by men.., S.E., 11:165-175. Freud, S. (1910). Contributions to a discussion on suicide., S.E., 11:231-232. Freud, S. (1910). Five lectures on psycho-analysis., S.E., 11:9-55. Freud, S. (1910). Leonardo da Vinci and a memory of his childhood., S.E., 11:63-137. Freud, S. (1910). Letter to Dr. Friedrich S. Krauss on "Anthropophyteia"., S.E., 11:233-235. Freud, S. (1910). Review of Wilhelm Neutra's "Letters to Neurotic Women"., S.E., 11:238-238. Freud, S. (1910). The antithetical meaning of primal words., S.E., 11:155-161. Freud, S. (1910). The future prospects of psycho-analytic therapy., S.E., 11:141-151. Freud, S. (1910). The psycho-analytic view of psychogenic disturbance of vision., S.E., 11:211- 218. Freud, S. (1910). Two instances of pathogenic phantasies revealed by patients.., S.E., 11:236- 237. Freud, S. (1911). Formulations on the two principles of mental functioning., S.E., 12:218-226. Freud, S. (1911). M. Steiner's "The Psychical Disorders of Male Potency"., S.E., 12:345-346. Freud, S. (1911). Notes on autobiographical account case of paranoia.., S.E., 12:9-82. Freud, S. (1911). The handling of dream-interpretation in psycho-analysis., S.E., 12:91-96. Freud, S. (1911). The significance of sequences of vowels., S.E., 12:341-341. Freud, S. (1911). `Great is Diana of the Ephesians'., S.E., 12:342-342. Freud, S. (1912). A note on the unconscious in psycho-analysis., S.E., 12:260-266. Freud, S. (1912). Contributions to a discussion on masturbation., S.E., 12:243-254. Freud, S. (1912). On the universal tendency to debasement in the sphere of love.., S.E., 11:179- 190. Freud, S. (1912). Recommendations to physicians practicing psycho-analysis., S.E., 12:111-120. Freud, S. (1912). The dynamics of transference., S.E., 12:99-108. Freud, S. (1912). Types of onset of neurosis., S.E., 12:231-238. Freud, S. (1913). An evidential dream., S.E., 12:267-278. Freud, S. (1913). Disposition to obsessional neurosis: problem choice of neurosis.., S.E., 12:317-326. Freud, S. (1913). Introduction to Pfister's "The Psycho-Analytic Method"., S.E., 12:327-332. Freud, S. (1913). Observations and examples from analytic practice., S.E., 13:191-198. Freud, S. (1913). On beginning the treatment (technique of psycho-analysis, I).., S.E., 12:123-144. Freud, S. (1913). On psycho-analysis., S.E., 12:205-212. Freud, S. (1913). Preface to Bourke's "Scatalogic Rites of All Nations"., S.E., 12:333-340. Freud, S. (1913). The claims of psycho-analysis to scientific interest., S.E., 13:165-190. Freud, S. (1913). The occurrence in dreams of material from fairy tales., S.E., 12:279-288. Freud, S. (1913). The theme of the three caskets., S.E., 12:291-301. Freud, S. (1913). Totem and taboo., S.E., 13:1-161. Freud, S. (1913). Two lies told by children., S.E., 12:303-310. Freud, S. (1914). Fausse reconnaissance, 'deja raconte' in psychoanalytic treatment.., S.E., 13:201-207. Freud, S. (1914). On narcissism: an introduction., S.E., 14:73-102. Freud, S. (1914). On the history of the psycho-analytic movement., S.E., 14:7-66. Freud, S. (1914). Remembering, repeating, working-through: technique of psychoas.., S.E., 12:147-156. Freud, S. (1914). Some reflections on schoolboy psychology., S.E., 13:241-244. Freud, S. (1914). The Moses of Michelangelo., S.E., 13:211-238. Freud, S. (1915). A connection between a symbol and a symptom., S.E., 14:339-340. Freud, S. (1915). A mythological parallel to a visual obsession., S.E., 14:337-338. Freud, S. (1915). Case of paranoia running counter to the psycho-analytic theory.., S.E., 14:261- 272. Freud, S. (1915). Instincts and their vicissitudes., S.E., 14:117-140. Freud, S. (1915). Letter to Dr. Hermine von Hug-Hellmuth., S.E., 14:341-341. Freud, S. (1915). Observations on transference-love: technique of psycho-analysis.., S.E., 12:159-171. Freud, S. (1915). Repression., S.E., 14:146-158. Freud, S. (1915). The unconscious., S.E., 14:166-204. Freud, S. (1915). Thoughts for the times on war and death., S.E., 14:273-300. Freud, S. (1916). Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. Parts I, II., S.E., 15:9-239. Freud, S. [Int. J. Psychoanal. 23:84] (1916). On transience., SE, 14:305-307. Freud, S. (1916). Some character-types met with in psycho-analytic work., S.E., 14:311-333. Freud, S. (1916). The History of the Psychoanalytic Movement., New York: Nervous & Mental Disease. Freud, S. (1917). A childhood recollection from "Dichtung und Wahrheit". [Goethe], S.E., 17:145-156. Freud, S. [Int. J. Psychoanal. 1:17] (1917). A difficulty in the path of psycho-analysis., SE, 17:135-144. Freud, S. (1917). A metapsychological supplement to the theory of dreams., S.E., 14:222-235.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Is Psychoanalytic Literary Criticism?1
    2013 Spring issue FINAL.pdf_2011 Fall edition 4/17/13 12:18 PM Page 8 8 fort da (2013), 19 (1), 8-28 WHAT IS PSYCHOANALYTIC LITERARY CRITICISM?1 by Benjamin H. Ogden, Ph.D., and Thomas H. Ogden, M.D. The history of psychoanalytic literary criticism is as old as psychoanaly- sis, but it has undergone considerable change since Freud’s famous readings of Hamlet (1900), the novels of Dostoevsky (1928), and the story of Moses (1939). The methodology of psychoanalytic literary criticism introduced by Freud and adopted by most psychoanalysts and non-analysts through the greater part of the 20th century is founded on the idea that writers create sto- ries and characters that reflect their own unconscious psychology. A text is a mirror of the unconscious mind of the writer, much as dreams are creations of the unconscious mind that are disguised in order to escape repression (“censorship”), thus gaining access to preconscious and conscious aware- ness (our remembered dreams). Through readings of this sort, psychoana- lytic literary criticism brought established analytic formulations to bear on the text, for instance, constellations of feeling understandable in terms of the Oedipus complex, castration anxiety, the incest taboo, oral, anal, and phal- lic stages of psychosexual development, and the like. The best known, and most widely studied, early examples of this type of formulaic Freudian reading are Ernest Jones’s (1949) reading of Hamlet (in which he concludes that Hamlet is unable to fulfill his duty to kill his uncle because that murder is too closely linked in his repressed unconscious to his forbidden oedipal wishes to murder his father and marry his mother); and Marie Bonaparte’s (1933) study of Edgar Allen Poe, which owed much to Freud’s (1908) “Creative Writers and Day-dreaming.” As psychoanalytic theories of early childhood development grew more nuanced, so did the range of concepts that psychoanalysts used to decode lit- erary texts.
    [Show full text]
  • V O L N E Y P. G a Y R E a D I N G F R E U D
    VOLNEY P. GAY READING FREUD Psychology, Neurosis, and Religion READING FREUD READING FREUD %R American Academy of Religion Studies in Religion Charley Hardwick and James O. Duke, Editors Number 32 READING FREUD Psychology, Neurosis, and Religion by Volney P. Gay READING FREUD Psychology, Neurosis, and Religion VOLNEY P. GAY Scholars Press Chico, California READING FREUD Psychology, Neurosis, and Religion by Volney P. Gay ©1983 American Academy of Religion Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Gay, Volney Patrick. Reading Freud. (Studies in religion / American Academy of Religion ; no. 32) 1. Psychoanalysis and religion. 2. Freud, Sigmund, 1856-1939. 3. Religion—Controversial literature—History. I. Title. II. Series: Studies in Religion (American Academy of Religion) ; no. 32. BF175.G38 1983 200\1'9 83-2917 ISBN 0-89130-613-7 Printed in the United States of America for Barbara CONTENTS Acknowledgments viii Introduction ix Why Study Freud? Freud and the Love of Truth The Goals of This Book What This Book Will Not Do How to Use This Book References and Texts I Freud's Lectures on Psychoanalysis 1 Five Lectures on Psycho-analysis (SE 11) 1909 Introductory Lectures on Psycho-analysis (SE 15 & 16) 1915-16 II On the Reality of Psychic Pain: Three Case Histories 41 Fragment of an Analysis of a Case of Hysteria (SE 7) 1905 "Dora" Notes Upon a Case of Obsessional Neurosis (SE 10) 1909 "Rat Man" From the History of an Infantile Neurosis (SE 17) 1918 "Wolf Man" III The Critique of Religion 69 "The Uncanny" (SE 17) 1919 Totem and Taboo (SE 13) 1912-13 Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego (SE 18) 1921 The Future of an Illusion (SE 21) 1927 Moses and Monotheism (SE 23) 1939 References Ill Index 121 Acknowledgments I thank Charley Hardwick and an anonymous reviewer, Peter Homans (University of Chicago), Liston Mills (Vanderbilt), Sarah Gates Campbell (Peabody-Vanderbilt), Norman Rosenblood (McMaster), and Davis Perkins and his colleagues at Scholars Press for their individual efforts on behalf of this book.
    [Show full text]
  • A Counter-Theory of Transference
    A Counter-Theory of Transference John M. Shlien, Harvard University "Transference" is a fiction, invented and maintained by the therapist to protect himself from the consequences of his own behavior. To many, this assertion will seem an exaggeration, an outrage, an indictment. It is presented here as a serious hypothesis, charging a highly invested profession with the task of re-examining a fundamental concept in practice. It is not entirely new to consider transference as a defense. Even its proponents cast it among the defense mechanisms when they term it a "projection". But they mean that the defense is on the part of the patient. My assertion suggests a different type of defense; denial or distortion, and on the part of the therapist. Mine is not an official position in client-centered therapy. There is none. Carl Rogers has dealt with the subject succinctly, in about twenty pages (1951, pp. 198-217), a relatively brief treatment of a matter that has taken up volumes of the literature in the fleld.[1] "In client-centered therapy, this involved and persistent dependency relationship does not tend to develop" (p. 201), though such transference attitudes are evident in a considerable proportion of cases handled by client-centered therapists. Transference is not fostered or cultivated by this present-time oriented framework where intensive exploration of early childhood is not required, and where the therapist is visible and available for reality resting. While Rogers knows of the position taken here and has, I believe, been influenced by it since its first presentation in 1959, he has never treated the transference topic as an issue of dispute.
    [Show full text]
  • British Psychoanalysis
    British Psychoanalysis British Psychoanalysis: New Perspectives in the Independent Tradition is a new and extended edition of The British School of Psychoanalysis: The Independent Tradition, which explored the successes and failures of the early environment; transference and counter-transference in the psychoanalytic encounter; regression in the situation of treatment, and female sexuality. Published in the mid-1980s, it had an important influence on the development of psychoanalysis both in Great Britain and abroad, was translated into several languages and became a central textbook in academic and professional courses. This new, updated book includes not only many of the original papers, but also new chapters written for this volume by Hannah Browne, Josh Cohen, Steven Groarke, Gregorio Kohon, Rosine Perelberg and Megan Virtue. Addressing and reflecting on the four main themes of the first collection, the new papers discuss such subjects as: • a new focus on earliest infancy • new directions in Independent clinical thinking • the question of therapeutic regression • the centrality of sexual difference in Freud. They also highlight the connections between and the mutual influence of British and French psychoanalysis, now a critical subject in contem- porary psychoanalytic debates. British Psychoanalysis: New Perspectives in the Independent Tradition will be important not only to psychoanalysts and psychoanalytic psycho- therapists and the full spectrum of professionals involved in mental health. It will be of great value in psychotherapy and counselling training and an important resource for teaching and academic activities. Gregorio Kohon is a Training Analyst of the British Psychoanalytical Society. His psychoanalytic publications include Reflections on the Aesthetic Experience: Psychoanalysis and the Uncanny, published by Routledge in 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Title <ARTICLES>Sexuation and Sexuality in Psychoanalysis : Rereading Freud Against Lacanians Author(S) FURUKAWA , Naoko C
    <ARTICLES>Sexuation and Sexuality in Psychoanalysis : Title Rereading Freud Against Lacanians Author(s) FURUKAWA , Naoko Citation 京都社会学年報 : KJS (2015), 23: 19-34 Issue Date 2015-12-25 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/209704 本誌に掲載された原稿の著作権は、社会学研究室に帰属 Right するものとする。 Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University 19 Sexuation and Sexuality in Psychoanalysis: Rereading Freud Against Lacanians Naoko FURUKAWA 1. Introduction This article represents an attempt to intervene in the current debate between psychoanalysis and feminism and to provide a new perspective in this research field. Over the past few decades, social constructionist approaches have been increasingly influential in feminist and queer studies. The recent feminist theory has shifted its focus to the way in which sex, gender, and sexuality are discursively produced, the process whereby social discourses on sex and gender are organized within a culturally and historically specific context. This “performative” understanding of gender challenges the essentialist notion of the difference between masculinity and femininity as innate, biological one. It is against this background that a number of feminists had recourse to Lacanian psychoanalysis for an anti-essentialist view of sexual difference. There has been a complex and contentious history between feminism and psychoanalysis, which has given rise to a heated theoretical debate on Lacanian psychoanalysis, following the groundbreaking work of Mitchell (1973). Lacan’s work has recently had a powerful influence on feminist appropriations of the psychoanalytic theory and concept. Inspired by Lacanian psychoanalysis, many feminists, including Mitchell (1973), Rose (1987), Brennan (1993), Gallop (1985), Grosz (1990), Wright (2000), Ragland-Sullivan (2004), have highly rated his rejection of Freud’s essentialism, and chosen Lacan’s version of castration and Oedipus complex, thereby shifting their focus from the anatomical and biological difference to the symbolic laws of language.
    [Show full text]
  • Eroticizing Marx, Revolutionizing Freud: Marcuse's Psychoanalytic Turn
    KRITIKE VOLUME THREE NUMBER ONE (JUNE 2009) 10-23 Article Eroticizing Marx, Revolutionizing Freud: Marcuse’s Psychoanalytic Turn Jeffry V. Ocay he conclusion arrived at in the article titled “Heidegger, Hegel, Marx: Marcuse and the Theory of Historicity,” which appeared in a previous issue of this journal, accounts for Herbert Marcuse’s view of the T 1 possibility of the individual to become disposed to radical action. Marcuse thus wants to suggest that there is still hope for the Enlightenment’s project of “emancipation,” and that there is still a revolutionary subject who can carry out this political struggle for liberation. The progression of consciousness which results in a historically conscious individual exemplified by the “conscious slave” in Hegel’s discussion of master-slave relation provided Marcuse the basis of his claim that the individual can be an active and dynamic political subject. Yet the slave who realizes via the notion of labor that it is himself and not the master who is truly free is, after all, still a slave. This means that individuals still need to fight for their freedom.2 Like Marx, Marcuse believes that the internal logic of overproduction and excessive consumption vis-à-vis massive pauperization3 in a capitalist society lead to the self-destruction of society. The capitalist system of overproduction coupled with excessive consumption creates insatiable individuals whose needs and desires are impossible to satisfy.4 This is dangerous for Marcuse because as the society produces more and more to 1 See Jeffry V. Ocay, “Heidegger, Hegel, Marx: Marcuse and the Theory of Historicity,” in KRITIKE: An Online Journal of Philosophy, 2:2 (December 2008), 46-64, <http://www.kritike.org/journal/issue_4/ocay_december2008.pdf>.
    [Show full text]
  • PSYCHOANALYST Quarterly Magazine of the American Psychoanalytic Association Tucson and the INSIDE TAP…
    the Spring/Summer 2011 AMERICAN Volume 45, No. 2 PSYCHOANALYST Quarterly Magazine of The American Psychoanalytic Association Tucson and the INSIDE TAP… American Psychoanalyst Election Results ........ 4 Leo Rangell One Hundred Years When the former editor of TAP invited me THE SCOPE OF PSYCHOANALYSIS of History ....... 7–12 to write something about how the American To pursue the thought, I would like to have Special Section psychoanalyst relates himself to the event in us look first at some historical accounts rela- Tucson (“This is a magazine, not a journal,” he tive to the subject as I have lived through it on Tucson ...... 14 –21 added, which would make the task easier.), during my three-quarters of a century as a Research Grants my first reaction was to say, “No thanks, we psychoanalyst. During the early decades of my don’t, or cannot, look into that: There is no psychoanalytic career, I was imbued with the Awarded ......... 22 room for anything psychoanalytic in this feeling that psychoanalysis stops here, that psy- Special Section wanton act.” But on second thought, the chopathy in any of its forms spells the limiting on Privacy and shootings that day came from the mind of a factor in applying analytic insights. Psychoanaly- person, and psychoanalysis is to me the sis was for the neurotic, not the psychopath. the Courts ...... 28–30 essence of the science of the human mind. Continued on page 15 Nothing in the latter can be omitted; there is an explanation for the mental landscape in its totality or of any part. Leo Rangell Tucson was in fact one in a series, which there is no reason to believe will Fellow Members of APsaA, not continue.
    [Show full text]
  • On Freud's Geographies
    Edinburgh Research Explorer On Freud’s Geographies Citation for published version: Bondi, L 2014, On Freud’s Geographies. in P Kingsbury & S Pile (eds), Psychoanalytic Geographies. Ashgate Publishing. Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: Psychoanalytic Geographies Publisher Rights Statement: © Bondi, L. (2014). On Freud’s Geographies. In P. Kingsbury, & S. Pile (Eds.), Psychoanalytic Geographies. Ashgate Publishing, Limited. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 Paul Kingsbury and Steve Pile (eds) Psychoanalytic Geographies Ashgate On Freud’s Geographies1 Liz Bondi Introduction During the first quarter of the twentieth century psychoanalysis was taken up enthusiastically in the United States of America, the United Kingdom and many other parts of Europe. Sigmund Freud’s (1926e/2002) essay, ‘The Question of Lay Analysis’ is widely cited as an important ‘state of the art’ account of his theory and practice of psychoanalysis in the 1920s, and is still frequently recommended as an introduction to his thinking.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early History of Psychoanalysis in San Francisco
    Benveniste, D. (2006) The Early History of Psychoanalysis in San Francisco. Psychoanalysis and History. 8(2) July 2006. The Early History of Psychoanalysis in San Francisco Daniel Benveniste, Ph.D. Caracas, Venezuela The early history of psychoanalysis in San Francisco formally begins with the opening of Alfred Kroeber’s psychoanalytic office in 1918 and ends with the death of Siegfried Bernfeld in 1953. Between those years, San Francisco witnessed a small group of Americans and European émigrés coming together and creating the foundation of psychoanalysis in San Francisco. The issues dominating the day were those of lay analysis, psychoanalytic training models and World War II. Within this small psychoanalytic community, there were a number of extremely creative analysts who, along with the rest, participated in some rare moments in which a creative and ecumenical spirit prevailed and others in which divisiveness limited them. Without a historical context, those of us in the depth psychologies tend to become arrogant and assert the ahistorical and timeless truth of our views. We fall victim to "the narcissism of minor differences" and project our dreaded other onto the various others around us whether they be pop psychology innovators, old guard upholders of the dogma, or just our theoretical cousins. But psychoanalysis is not a natural science. It is a historical science. Nathan Adler used to say, "Every generation must rediscover psychoanalysis for itself." And I would add that we must contextualize our discoveries and re-discoveries in the social, historical and economic moment in which we are situated. There are many reasons for recalling the early history of the depth psychologies in San Francisco.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of the British Psychoanalytical Society
    A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOANALYTICAL SOCIETY Ken Robinson When Ernest Jones set about establishing psychoanalysis in Britain, two intertwining tasks faced him: establishing the reputation of psychoanalysis as a respectable pursuit and defining an identity for it as a discipline that was distinct from but related to cognate disciplines. This latter concern with identity would remain central to the development of the British Society for decades to come, though its inflection would shift as the Society sought first to mark out British psychoanalysis as having its own character within the International Psychoanalytical Association, and then to find a way of holding together warring identities within the Society. Establishing Psychoanalysis: The London Society Ernest Jones’ diary for 1913 contains the simple entry for October 30: “Ψα meeting. Psycho-med. dinner” (Archives of the British Psychoanalytical Society, hereafter Archives). This was the first meeting of the London Psychoanalytical Society. In early August Jones had returned to London from ignominious exile in Canada after damaging accusations of inappropriate sexual conduct in relation to children. Having spent time in London and Europe the previous year, he now returned permanently, via Budapest where from June he had received analysis from Ferenczi. Once in London he wasted no time in beginning practice as a psychoanalyst, seeing his first patient on the 14th August (Diary 1913, Archives), though he would soon take a brief break to participate in what would turn out to be a troublesome Munich Congress in September (for Jones’s biography generally, see Maddox [2006]). Jones came back to a London that showed a growing interest in unconscious phenomena and abnormal psychology.
    [Show full text]
  • DOSTOEVSKY and PSYCHOANALYSIS by Magda
    DOSTOEVSKY AND PSYCHOANALYSIS by Magda Campbell, M.D.* New York University Dostoevsky's most complex personality, life full of events and the numerous heroes in his novels, each of whom alone is a psychological study in depth, per se, always fascinated psychiatrists, psychoanalysts, and psychologists. Ever since Freud's study on Dostoevsky which appeared in 1928, analytic papers have been written about this great writer himself, his work, his characters and even of the dreams described in his novels. I will limit my topic mainly to Freud's paper, for two reasons. First, it was one of the earliest and remains one of the most important. Second, it is most interesting how one intellectual giant wrote about another one. When Freud thinks as a psychologist, he gives a brilliant picture of Dostoevsky's personality and ex- plains some of the relationships existing between his life and the figures in his novels. When he writes as a moralist about Dostoevsky, he fails entirely. He fails, because of his lack of understanding of the struggling, suffering man, the Christian, the great Russian, who in his anguish was striving for ideals and searching for the meaning of life for himself, for Russia, for mankind. Dostoevsky was born 150 years ago; psychoanalysis began with. Freud some 70 years later. Psychoanalysis started as a method of investigating mental processes. Psychoanalytic theory, which arose from psychoanalysis, is concerned with both normal and abnormal mental development and functioning in man. Today, it has become part of human psycho- logy. Psychoanalysis has been called depth-psychology, because of its concern with the unconscious mental processes, which significantly influence and even determine man's thoughts, actions, and behavior in general.
    [Show full text]
  • PT 161 Libido Theory in Freud E
    Syllabus PT 161 Libido Theory in Freud E. Barz Fall 2017 Wed. 7:30-9:30 CMPS: 30 Clock Hours NYGSP: 2 Credits Course Description This course studies Freud’s papers on human sexuality and libido theory from the seduction theory to infantile sexuality, the perversions, transference love, and the concept of Eros as a binding force. Contemporary ideas are discussed in relation to Freud’s understanding of the part played by the libido in sexuality, civilization, and the binding of destructive forces. Objectives Students who complete this course successfully will be able to: • trace the development of the concept of libido in Freud’s thought from its origin to his final statement; • identify the significant differences between the “libido” as originally conceived and the “libido” as a part of the larger concept of “Eros” ; • discuss some of the clinical implications of the changes Freud made to his original concept, including the concepts of ego-libido, object-libido, and narcissism; • formulate some ideas on symptom formation, anxiety, and sublimation; and • raise some questions about Freud’s libido theory, on the basis of class discussions of some criticisms that have been raised and/or on the basis of other reading or experience. Course Requirements 1) Students will be expected to study the required readings before class and be prepared to discuss them. 2) A log of each class should be emailed to the instructor at [email protected] before the start of the next scheduled class. Logs are a private communication to Dr. Holmes, in which the student is invited to explore ideas and feelings about the readings and class discussion, as well as offer criticisms, questions, and relevant personal information.
    [Show full text]