Introduction to Psychoanalysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction to Psychoanalysis Introduction to Psychoanalysis The psychoanalytic movement has expanded and diversified in many directions over its one hundred year history. Introduction to Psychoanalysis: Contemporary Theory and Practice examines the contributions made by the various schools of thought, explaining the similarities and differences between Contemporary Freudian, Independent, Kleinian, Object Relations, Interpersonal, Self Psychological and Lacanian analysis. The authors address crucial questions about the role of psychoanalysis in psychiatry and look ahead to the future. The book is divided into two parts covering theory and practice. The first part considers theories of psychological development, transference and countertransference, dreams, defence mechanisms, and the various models of the mind. The second part is a practical introduction to psychoanalytic technique with specific chapters on psychoanalytic research and the application of psychoanalytic ideas and methods to treating psychiatric illness. Well referenced and illustrated throughout with vivid clinical examples, this will be an invaluable text for undergraduate and postgraduate courses in psychoanalysis and psychoanaltytic psychotherapy, and an excellent source of reference for students and professionals in psychiatry, psychology, social work, and mental health nursing. Anthony Bateman is Consultant Psychotherapist, St Ann’s Hospital, London and a member of the British Psychoanalytical Society. Jeremy Holmes is Consultant Psychotherapist and Psychiatrist, North Devon. Introduction to Psychoanalysis Contemporary theory and practice Anthony Bateman and Jeremy Holmes London and New York First published 1995 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2001. © 1995 Anthony Bateman and Jeremy Holmes All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data Bateman, Anthony Introduction to psychoanalysis: contemporary theory and practice/Anthony Bateman and Jeremy Holmes. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Psychoanalysis. I. Holmes, Jeremy. II. Title. [DNLM: 1. Psychoanalysis. 2. Psychoanalytic Theory. 3. Psychoanalytic Therapy. WM 460 B328i 1995] RC504.B295 1995 616.89´17–dc20 DNLM/DLC for Library of Congress 95–7617 CIP ISBN 0–415–10738–5 (hbk) ISBN 0–415–10739–3 (pbk) ISBN 0-203-13305-6 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-17610-3 (Glassbook Format) Contents Preface vii Acknowledgements xi Part I: Theory 1 Introduction: history and controversy 3 2 Models of the mind 27 3 Origins of the internal world 49 4 Mechanisms of defence 76 5 Transference and Countertransference 95 6 Dreams, symbols, imagination 118 Part II: Practice 7 The assessment interview 139 8 The therapeutic relationship 153 9 Clinical dilemmas 182 10 Psychoanalytic contributions to psychiatry 212 11 Research in psychoanalysis 243 References 260 Index 283 Preface Newcomers to psychoanalysis, especially if they wish to avoid confusion, are usually best advised to go straight to Freud – to the lectures on technique (Freud 1912a, b; 1914a), the Introductory Lectures (Freud 1916/ 17), or the two encyclopedia articles (Freud 1922). This is not just because Freud is the fount from which psychoanalysis has flowed, or because of the clarity of his thought and style, or even because ‘going back to Freud’ remains a psychoanalytic imperative. It is also because in the early years a single psychoanalytic ‘mastertext’ (Schafer 1990) was still possible, in a way that has become increasingly problematic as the psychoanalytic movement has both expanded and diversified, but also been challenged by controversy and schism. There are many excellent introductory or semi-introductory contemporary books about the practice of psychoanalysis. Those that we have found especially useful are starred in the bibliography. Each tends to present a particular perspective on the psychoanalytic process: Kleinian, Independent, Contemporary Freudian, Interpersonal, Kohutian, Lacanian, Ego Psychological. This is partly an inevitable result of the unique centrality of personal analysis in analytic training. Each of the differing psychoanalytic approaches represents not just a theoretical orientation, but a tradition, style, affiliation, and set of common values and assumptions that the analysand will acquire in the course of this training. He or she has to undergo the maturational task of both assimilating all that has been identified with, and at the same time achieving the inner freedom needed to find his or her own analytic voice. When we were invited by Edwina Welham of Routledge, at Jonathan Pedder’s suggestion, to write a companion volume to the Introduction to viii Preface Psychotherapy (Brown and Pedder 1993), we felt that the time was ripe for an attempt to bring together the varying strands of psychoanalytic theory and practice, to highlight their ‘common ground’ (Wallerstein 1992) as well as their differences. We were encouraged by the idea that despite theoretical divergence, ‘clinical theory’ (G. Klein 1976) can be unified in a meaningful way. We were determined to anchor our text with many clinical examples, and to try to show how a variety of clinical approaches fit within a common framework. We are aware of the dangers and pitfalls of both sectarianism and eclecticism. Analysts need to be able to draw on the range of different ideas and techniques that are encompassed within the diversity of their profession. At the same time, in order to practise effectively, most need to work within a particular analytic perspective. Our book is perhaps in the ‘critical dictionary’ (Rycroft 1972; Hinshelwood 1989) tradition in that it tries to clarify, question and extract what is valuable from each psychoanalytic viewpoint. Wherever possible, we have brought research findings to bear on psychoanalytic concepts and practice, and, within the limitations of the lag between composition and publication, to be as up-to-date as possible with contemporary psychoanalytic thought. We have subtitled our book ‘contemporary theory and practice’, drawing a useful, but none the less somewhat artificial, contrast between ‘classical’ and ‘modern’ (or ‘contemporary’) practice and thought. ‘Classical’ and ‘modern’, while useful as a shorthand, should not be thought of as oppositional, but rather the one resting on the other. Also, since we work both simultaneously within a public sector psychiatric context as well as private practice, we have angled a fair proportion of what we discuss towards the role of psychoanalytic therapy with quite disturbed patients. That raises the issues of who we, the authors are. One of us (AB) is an analyst with considerable psychiatric experience, the other (JH) also a psychiatrist and psychotherapist with psychoanalytic leanings. We hope that as a team we have enough in common to provide a unified view, and enough difference to add breadth to our exposition. On the whole our collaboration has run smoothly. On occasions one of us has felt that we have been too critical and not ‘analytic’ enough; the other that we were being too reverential and have failed to locate the analytic approach within a wider context. And what of you, the reader? Our hope was to produce a book that would be useful for students of psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapy looking for a single volume that would encompass the Preface ix main principles and practice of contemporary psychoanalysis, be clinically relevant, and theoretically stimulating. For some, no doubt, much of what we say will be familiar, for others obscure. We hope we have created sufficient transitional space between innocence and experience to be of value. We are only too aware of the many faults of omission and commission in the book. We have tackled the issues of ethnicity, class and gender in only a very limited way. Apropos of the latter, like many contemporary authors we have been stymied by the problem of pronouns, but, in the end, reluctantly have stayed with the less obtrusive, but patriarchal ‘he’, despite the fact that statistically, female analysts and patients probably outnumber males. Our psychoanalytic approach is almost exclusively ‘Freudian’, and we have undoubtedly failed to do justice to the scope of Jungian psychoanalysis. Another notable omission is any serious consideration of child psychoanalysis, which is outwith both our competences. Lacking space rather than enthusiasm, we have failed to follow the important cultural ramifications of psychoanalysis into the fields of literary theory, psychohistory and sociology. The text is illustrated with many examples. We are deeply aware of the ethical difficulties in using case material in print. In some instances we have asked our patients for permission to publish such material. In others this has not been possible, but we have in every case disguised and fictionalised biographical details. Books should not necessarily be read from start to finish. Each chapter is complete
Recommended publications
  • Object Relations Theories and the Developmental Tilt Stephen A
    (1984) Contemp. Psychoanal., 20:473-499 Object Relations Theories and the Developmental Tilt Stephen A. Mitchell, Ph.D. It is the predicament of the neurotic that he translates everything into the terms of infantile sexuality; but if the doctor does so too, then where do we get? Joseph Campbell, The Masks of God THE DESIGNATION "OBJECT RELATIONS THEORY" has been used with reference to a wide range of very different kinds of formulations: from Klein's rich and complex depiction of unconscious fantasy, to Fairbairn's highly abstract, schematic structural model, to Bowlby's ethologically-based theory of attachment, to Winnicott's epigramatic paradoxes and pithy observations about children, to Mahler's powerfully evocative portrayal of the longing for symbiotic fusion, to Jacobson's causuistic emendations of Freud's drive theory. To employ a common term for such a wide array of disparate points of view runs a risk—the fashionable popularity accruing to "object relations theories" in recent years has blurred important distinctions beneath a hazy aura connoting theory that is new, humanistic, often esoteric, and presumably pertaining to the deepest recesses of the mind and the earliest developmental phases. Is the employment of a common phrase to designate these different groups of theories useful or misleading? What do these heterogeneous theories have in common? What is essential and what is artifactual and political in their formulation? What has been their central role in the development of psychoanalytic ideas? Since the multiplicity of theories of object relations has been parallelled by a proliferation of different histories and interpretations of what might be regarded as the "object relations movement, " there is no consensus concerning these questions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Good Intense “Loves” the Bad Intense: Intensity and the Death Drive
    Future Insights No. 2 - Year 9 06/2019 - LC.1 [sic] - a journal of literature, culture and literary translation Dejan Durić, University of Rijeka, Croatia ([email protected]) - Željka Matijašević, University of Zagreb, Croatia ([email protected]) The Good Intense “Loves” the Bad Intense: Intensity and the Death Drive Abstract The article analyzes the concept of intensity promoted in late capitalism, and its difference from the teleological intensity of the countercultural sixties. Intensity is approached through psychoanalytic lenses as related to Freud’s drive theory, and to Lacan’s concept of jouissance. Counter-depressive intensity persists today devoid of any meaning, as it is a self-legitimating strategy of the most perfect and best conformed capitalist subject. The notion of the culture of intensity covers the natural privileging of late capitalism towards ‘the good intense.’ This paper analyzes its reverse: ‘the bad intense,’ and the tragedy of dysphoria. The movie Shame (2011), directed by Steve McQueen, is interpreted as an example of the transformation of the countercultural value of sexuality in the sixties to its mere reduction to both intense and numbing experience. Keywords: intensity, Eros, death drive, jouissance, euphoria, counterculture The true object of jouissance – if that word means anything – is death. The quest is not, as some say, for “some pleasure”; the quest is more precisely for the verification of the colour of emptiness. (Eric Laurent) 1. Introduction This paper analyzes the concept of intensity promoted in late capitalism as the only life worthy of living. Immoderation, extreme experiences, intensity gone astray and energy gone awry, ISSN 1847-7755; doi: 10.15291/sic/2.9.lc.1 1 Future Insights No.
    [Show full text]
  • Heinz Kohut's Theory of Narcissism1. Am. J. Psychoanal., 41:317- 326
    Mitchell, S.A. (1981). Heinz Kohut's Theory of Narcissism1. Am. J. Psychoanal., 41:317- 326. (1981). American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 41:317-326 Heinz Kohut's Theory of Narcissism1 Stephen A. Mitchell, Ph.D. My interest in Kohut's theory of narcissism has developed not just because I find his approach conceptually interesting and because his work has had an enormous impact on clinical practice, but because I think he illustrates, more than any other theorist I can think of, the political dimension within psychoanalytic theorizing. To highlight this aspect of his work, I would like to do three things in this presentation; first, to track the basic principles of Kohut's approach to narcissism and personality functioning in general; second, to place Kohut's work in the larger context of the history of psychoanalytic ideas and the range of strategies taken by various theorists for positioning themselves within that tradition; and third, to examine the implications of Kohut's ancestry in and political affiliation with drive theory for his formulations concerning narcissism. In presenting Kohut's views, I want to focus mostly on his most recent book, The Restoration of the Self.1 However, I would like to begin by briefly summarizing the major lines of his argument in his earlier book, The Analysis of the Self,2 published in 1971, since his fundamental innovations were introduced there. What has changed since 1971 are not Kohut's basic concepts, but the way he positions them vis-à-vis classical theory—in other words, his politics. In the earlier work Kohut takes as his terminological starting point Freud's original distinction between narcissistic libido and object libido, although he radically alters the meaning of these terms.
    [Show full text]
  • V O L N E Y P. G a Y R E a D I N G F R E U D
    VOLNEY P. GAY READING FREUD Psychology, Neurosis, and Religion READING FREUD READING FREUD %R American Academy of Religion Studies in Religion Charley Hardwick and James O. Duke, Editors Number 32 READING FREUD Psychology, Neurosis, and Religion by Volney P. Gay READING FREUD Psychology, Neurosis, and Religion VOLNEY P. GAY Scholars Press Chico, California READING FREUD Psychology, Neurosis, and Religion by Volney P. Gay ©1983 American Academy of Religion Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Gay, Volney Patrick. Reading Freud. (Studies in religion / American Academy of Religion ; no. 32) 1. Psychoanalysis and religion. 2. Freud, Sigmund, 1856-1939. 3. Religion—Controversial literature—History. I. Title. II. Series: Studies in Religion (American Academy of Religion) ; no. 32. BF175.G38 1983 200\1'9 83-2917 ISBN 0-89130-613-7 Printed in the United States of America for Barbara CONTENTS Acknowledgments viii Introduction ix Why Study Freud? Freud and the Love of Truth The Goals of This Book What This Book Will Not Do How to Use This Book References and Texts I Freud's Lectures on Psychoanalysis 1 Five Lectures on Psycho-analysis (SE 11) 1909 Introductory Lectures on Psycho-analysis (SE 15 & 16) 1915-16 II On the Reality of Psychic Pain: Three Case Histories 41 Fragment of an Analysis of a Case of Hysteria (SE 7) 1905 "Dora" Notes Upon a Case of Obsessional Neurosis (SE 10) 1909 "Rat Man" From the History of an Infantile Neurosis (SE 17) 1918 "Wolf Man" III The Critique of Religion 69 "The Uncanny" (SE 17) 1919 Totem and Taboo (SE 13) 1912-13 Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego (SE 18) 1921 The Future of an Illusion (SE 21) 1927 Moses and Monotheism (SE 23) 1939 References Ill Index 121 Acknowledgments I thank Charley Hardwick and an anonymous reviewer, Peter Homans (University of Chicago), Liston Mills (Vanderbilt), Sarah Gates Campbell (Peabody-Vanderbilt), Norman Rosenblood (McMaster), and Davis Perkins and his colleagues at Scholars Press for their individual efforts on behalf of this book.
    [Show full text]
  • About Psychoanalysis
    ABOUT PSYCHOANALYSIS What is psychoanalysis? What is psychoanalytic treatment for? Freud’s major discoveries and innovations • The Unconscious • Early childhood experiences • Psychosexual development • The Oedipus complex • Repression • Dreams are wish-fulfilments • Transference • Free association • The Ego, the Id and the Super-Ego Major discoveries and additions to psychoanalytic theory since Freud: the different strands and schools within psychoanalysis today • Classical and contemporary Freudians • Sándor Ferenczi • Ego-Psychology • Classical and contemporary Kleinians • The Bionian branch of the Kleinian School • Winnicott’s branch of the Object-Relations Theory • French psychoanalysis • Self-Psychology • Relational Psychoanalysis The core psychoanalytic method and setting • Method • Setting Various Psychoanalytic Treatment Methods (adult, children, groups, etc) • Psychoanalysis • Psychoanalytic or psychodynamic psychotherapy • Children and adolescents • Psychoanalytic psychodrama • Psychoanalytic Couples- and Family-Psychotherapy • Psychoanalytic Groups Psychoanalytic training Applied psychoanalysis The IPA, its organisation and ethical guidelines Where to encounter psychoanalysis? What is psychoanalysis? Psychoanalysis is both a theory of the human mind and a therapeutic practice. It was founded by Sigmund Freud between 1885 and 1939 and continues to be developed by psychoanalysts all over the world. Psychoanalysis has four major areas of application: 1) as a theory of how the mind works 2) as a treatment method for psychic problems 3) as a method of research, and 4) as a way of viewing cultural and social phenomena like literature, art, movies, performances, politics and groups. What is psychoanalytic treatment for? Psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapy are for those who feel caught in recurrent psychic problems that impede their potential to experience happiness with their partners, families, and friends as well as success and fulfilment in their work and the normal tasks of everyday life.
    [Show full text]
  • Intrapsychic Perspectives on Personality
    PSYCHODYNAMIC PERSPECTIVES ON PERSONALITY This educational CAPPE module is part i in section III: Theories of Human Functioning and Spirituality Written by Peter L. VanKatwyk, Ph.D. Introduction Psychodynamic theory goes back more than 100 years and has been a principal influence in the early history of clinical pastoral education (CPE). It is a way of thinking about personality dynamics in interpreting and understanding both the spiritual care-provider and care-receiver. This module will briefly summarize the basic theory and punctuate psychodynamic concepts that have been significant in the study of psychology of religion and theological reflection in the practice of spiritual care and counselling. Psychodynamic theories presently practiced include in historical sequence the following three schools that will be covered in this module: 1. Ego Psychology, following and extending the classic psychoanalytic theory of Freud, with major representatives in Anna Freud, Heinz Hartmann and Erik Erikson. 2. Object Relations Theory, derived from the work of Melanie Klein and members of the “British School,” including those who are prominent in religious studies and the practice of spiritual care: Ronald Fairbairn, Harry Guntrip, and D.W. Winnicott. 3. Self Psychology, modifying psychoanalytic theory with an interpersonal relations focus, originating in Heinz Kohut, systematized and applied for social work and counselling practice by Miriam Elson. In conjunction these psychodynamic theories offer three main perspectives on personality: 1. the human mind harbors conflict – with powerful unconscious forces that are continually thwarted in expressing themselves by a broad range of counteracting psychological processes and defense mechanisms. 2. each person carries an unconscious internalized world of personal relationships – with mental representations that reflect earlier experiences of self and others which often surface as patterns in current relationships and interpersonal problems.
    [Show full text]
  • A Hoarding Syndrome, Syllogomania, Disposophobia, Compullsive
    1 Deep under the “mess” A hoarding syndrome, Syllogomania, disposophobia, The Collyer Brother's syndrome, the Bowebird symptom, »messy«, the Messie-Phenomenon….. In my essay I will describe a part of life style of two persons, I will name them John and Jane. We will try to understand, to know, to see, to hear, to feel their style of life and there personality structure. I will add my observations and some theory about Hoarding, Borderline Personality Disorder, Obsessive - Compulsive Personality Disorder and Psychoanalytical theory and try to understand and describe that the problem of “mess” and hoarding is a symptom of something that is deep under the “mess” - we can see the “mess”. Can we see also under the “mess”? What is covered deeper? What is covered under the “mess” by John and Jane? What are they hoarding and what they did (or do) not get? John is a 36 years old man. He says that his problems begun at the age of 16. He has taken forbidden drugs, drunk too much alcohol, has stolen cars, was in re-educating institution for teenagers, had problems in his primary family, with “not understandable mother and father”, and has had partner relationships, that all have ended in a bad way. His first love was a girl, who loved driving cars very fast. John describes this love as a ”mystical” love. The girl had a car accident and died. John has after this accident drunk even more alcohol and tried to commit a suicide. John has had visual hallucinations and has heard voices.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Countertransference with Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder
    Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine DigitalCommons@PCOM PCOM Psychology Dissertations Student Dissertations, Theses and Papers 2003 Understanding Countertransference with Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder : an Exploratory Quantitative Investigation Michelle Saxen Hunt Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.pcom.edu/psychology_dissertations Part of the Clinical Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Hunt, Michelle Saxen, "Understanding Countertransference with Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder : an Exploratory Quantitative Investigation" (2003). PCOM Psychology Dissertations. Paper 65. This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Dissertations, Theses and Papers at DigitalCommons@PCOM. It has been accepted for inclusion in PCOM Psychology Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@PCOM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine Clinical Psychology Department ofPsychology UNDERST ANDING COUNTERTRANSFERENCE WITH PATIENTS WITH BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER: AN EXPLORATORY QUANTITATIVE INVESTIGATION by Michelle Saxen Hunt Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor ofPsychology August 2003 Committee Members' Signatures: Rosemary Mennuti, Ed.D., Chairperson Robert A. DiTomasso, Ph.D., ABPP Gina M. Fusco, Psy.D. Arthur Freeman, Ed.D., ABPP, Chair, Department of Psychology 111 Acknowledgments This project could not have been completed without the support and encouragement of Dr. Roe Mennuti. She believed in me and gave me the confidence I needed to keep going during my times of doubt that there would ever be a finished product. Roe always has a calming and nurturing effect on me and for this I am extremely grateful. I would also like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Benefits, Limitations, and Potential Harm in Psychodrama
    Benefits, Limitations, and Potential Harm in Psychodrama (Training) © Copyright 2005, 2008, 2010, 2013, 2016 Rob Pramann, PhD, ABPP (Group Psychology) CCCU Training in Psychodrama, Sociometry, and Group Psychotherapy This article began in 2005 in response to a new question posed by the Utah chapter of NASW on their application for CEU endorsement. “If any speaker or session is presenting a fairly new, non-traditional or alternative approach, please describe the limitations, risks and/or benefits of the methods taught.” After documenting how Psychodrama is not a fairly new, non-traditional or alternative approach I wrote the following. I have made minor updates to it several times since. As a result of the encouragement, endorsement, and submission of it by a colleague it is listed in the online bibliography of psychodrama http://pdbib.org/. It is relevant to my approach to the education/training/supervision of Group Psychologists and the delivery of Group Psychology services. It is not a surprise that questions would be raised about the benefits, limitations, and potential harm of Psychodrama. J.L. Moreno (1989 – 1974) first conducted a psychodramatic session on April 1, 1921. It was but the next step in the evolution of his philosophical and theological interests. His approach continued to evolve during his lifetime. To him, creativity and (responsible) spontaneity were central. He never wrote a systematic overview of his approach and often mixed autobiographical and poetic material in with his discussion of his approach. He was a colorful figure and not afraid of controversy (Blatner, 2000). He was a prolific writer and seminal thinker.
    [Show full text]
  • A Counter-Theory of Transference
    A Counter-Theory of Transference John M. Shlien, Harvard University "Transference" is a fiction, invented and maintained by the therapist to protect himself from the consequences of his own behavior. To many, this assertion will seem an exaggeration, an outrage, an indictment. It is presented here as a serious hypothesis, charging a highly invested profession with the task of re-examining a fundamental concept in practice. It is not entirely new to consider transference as a defense. Even its proponents cast it among the defense mechanisms when they term it a "projection". But they mean that the defense is on the part of the patient. My assertion suggests a different type of defense; denial or distortion, and on the part of the therapist. Mine is not an official position in client-centered therapy. There is none. Carl Rogers has dealt with the subject succinctly, in about twenty pages (1951, pp. 198-217), a relatively brief treatment of a matter that has taken up volumes of the literature in the fleld.[1] "In client-centered therapy, this involved and persistent dependency relationship does not tend to develop" (p. 201), though such transference attitudes are evident in a considerable proportion of cases handled by client-centered therapists. Transference is not fostered or cultivated by this present-time oriented framework where intensive exploration of early childhood is not required, and where the therapist is visible and available for reality resting. While Rogers knows of the position taken here and has, I believe, been influenced by it since its first presentation in 1959, he has never treated the transference topic as an issue of dispute.
    [Show full text]
  • Cushioned Patient, Turmoiled Therapist:Awareness and Use of Countertransference and Enactment As Part of the Therapeutic Process
    Chapter CUSHIONED PATIENT, TURMOILED THERAPIST: AWARENESS AND USE OF COUNTERTRANSFERENCE AND ENACTMENT AS PART OF THE THERAPEUTIC PROCESS Melissa Card, MA University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa ABSTRACT The therapeutic relationship can be difficult to navigate particularly when communication is projected through the unsaid or unconscious processes in the room. The therapist is tasked with being able to detect the unsaid through implicit or explicit countertransference. How the therapist deciphers the communication and works with the experienced countertransference impacts on the therapy. The therapy can either flourish or terminate prematurely. In presenting a case study of such an experience, I explore countertransference, enactment and the therapeutic relationship with a patient who struggled to engage with her own needs. I also explore my struggle of not being able to communicate my understanding of her need to her. Keywords: Therapy, therapeutic process, countertransference, enactment Corresponding author: Melissa Card, MA. Department of Psychology, Auckland Park Kingsway Campus, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa. E-mail: [email protected]. 2 Melissa Card INTRODUCTION The purpose of psychotherapy1 is to improve an individual’s life functioning and satisfaction, and the value of psychotherapy is measured by this improvement (Norcross 2000). Psychotherapy can be effective in alleviating psychological symptoms and effecting character change (Fosshage 2011, Lipsey and Wilson 1993, Seligman 2003, Wampold 2000). The therapeutic relationship comprises of two parties—a therapist and a patient. For therapists to be effective agents of change, they must be both physically and mentally fit. To enable this, therapists engage in physical self-care (e.g., exercise and diet) and reflect on their patterns through journaling, attending supervision, consulting with other professionals and participating in personal therapy.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychodynamic Approaches to Suicide and Self-Harm
    BJPsych Advances (2018), vol. 24, 37–45 doi: 10.1192/bja.2017.6 Psychodynamic approaches to ARTICLE suicide and self-harm† Jessica Yakeley & William Burbridge-James sociological approaches evolving from Durkheim’s Jessica Yakeley is a consultant SUMMARY work on the role of social control to contemporary psychiatrist in forensic psychother- apy, Director of the Portman Clinic, Rates of suicide and self-harm are rising in many notions of deviance, stigmatisation and self-expres- countries, and it is therapeutically important to and Director of Medical Education at sion (Taylor 2015); cultural approaches examining explore the personal stories and relationships the Tavistock and Portman NHS how suicide and self-harm vary across gender, ethni- Foundation Trust, London. She is also that underlie this behaviour. In this article psycho- city, sexual orientation and other cultural character- Editor of Psychoanalytic analytic and psychodynamic principles and con- Psychotherapy and a Fellow of the cepts in relation to violence towards the self are istics (Cover 2016); and philosophical and ethical British Psychoanalytical Society. introduced and the various unconscious meanings approaches exploring notions of utilitarianism, William Burbridge-James is a of suicide and self-harm are explored within a rela- autonomy and duty to others (Kelly 2011). More consultant psychiatrist in medical tional context and attachment framework. We recent psychopathological models include biological psychotherapy in Southend-on-Sea, Essex, and Chair of the Specialty describe how a psychodynamic approach may approaches studying the neurobiological correlates Advisory Committee of the Faculty of enhance the risk assessment and treatment of of self-injurious behaviour (Blasco-Fontecilla 2016) Medical Psychotherapy at the Royal patients presenting with self-harm and suicidality, and contemporary psychological approaches that College of Psychiatrists, London.
    [Show full text]