Control of the Beet Armyworm and Pepper Weevil on Pepper1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Control of the Beet Armyworm and Pepper Weevil on Pepper1 Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 95:349-351. 1982. CONTROL OF THE BEET ARMYWORM AND PEPPER WEEVIL ON PEPPER1 D. J. Schuster Newer insecticides have been evaluated for control of IFAS, University of Florida, the pepper weevil on pepper. Genung and Ozaki (3) found Agricultural Research & Education Center, carbaryl (Sevin®), acephate, chlordimeform (Fundal®), 5007-60th Stree East, methomyl, toxaphene, leptophos (Phosvel®) and endosulfan Bradenton, FL 33508 (Thiodan®) to be effective in reducing the number of adult weevils observed on foliage of treated plants. Rolston (5), P. H. Everett however, demonstrated in laboratory experiments that 4-5 IFAS, University of Florida, day old residues of acephate, chlordimeform and endosulfan Agricultural Research Center, did not induce more than ca. 15% adult mortality while Rt.I,Box2G, residues of methomyl and toxaphene induced no more than Immokalee, FL 33934 65% mortality. Rolston did demonstrate that residues of Additional index words. Spodoptera exigua (Hubner), carbofuran 4F (Furadan®), carbaryl, EPN + methyl Anthonomus eugenii Cano, Capsicum annuum L. parathion, thiodicarb (Larvin®) and permethrin (Pounce®) all resulted in over 90% mortality of adult weevils in the Abstract. Four field experiments were conducted to eval laboratory. The laboratory results with endosulfan and uate insecticides for control of insects on bell pepper carbaryl were substantiated in a field test. (Capsicum annuum L). Significant reductions in the numbers The purpose of the present investigations was to com of fruit damaged by beet armyworm larvae (Spodoptera pare various insecticides for control of the beet armyworm exigua (Hubner)) were observed with fenvalerate (Pydrin®), and pepper weevil on bell pepper grown in the field. permethrin (Ambush®, Pounce®), methomyl (Lannate®), acephate (Orthene®), cryolite (Kryocide®), chlorpyrifos Materials and Methods (Lorsban®), and encapsulated methyl parathion (Penncap M®). Control of the pepper weevil as measured by internal One experiment was conducted in the winter 1978-79 fruit damage was significant with fenvalerate, chlorpyrifos, season at the Agricultural Research $c Education Center and cryolite. (AREC) in Bradenton and 3 experiments were conducted in the spring seasons of 1980-82 at the Agricultural Research Bell pepper is a major vegetable crop of Florida amount Center (ARC) at Immokalee. Pepper cv. 'Early Cal Wonder' ing to a value of $55 million produced on 18,000 acres in was used in all experiments except in the spring 1980 when 1979 (1). This accounted for approximately 1/3 of the total 'Keystone Resistant Giant' was used. Transplants were set U.S. production and nearly 50% of the production during 12 inches (30.5 cm) apart in single rows in the middle or the period of November to June. The beet armyworm, black polyethylene-covered beds of either Myakka fine sand Spodoptera exigua (Hubner), and pepper weevil, Anthon (AREC) or Immokalee fine sand (ARC). Beds were either omus eugenii Cano, are important insect pests of peppers 2.5 ft (0.8 m) wide by 8 inches (20 cm) high (AREC) or 3 ft in Florida. Beet armyworm larvae may feed on foliage, par (0.9 m) wide by 6 inches (15.2 cm) high (ARC). Plots con ticularly in early instars. However, the most important sisted of either 10 (AREC) or 15 (ARC) plants and treat damage is inflicted when larvae bore into the fruit to feed, ments were replicated 4 times in randomized complete rendering them unharvestable. Pepper weevil females blocks. Plots were harvested 1-7 times. In addition, in the usually oviposit directly in the fruit and both males and spring 1980 and 1982 experiments, all fruit that had drop females may feed directly on the fruit. However, the result ped from the plants and were trapped in 2 inch (5 cm) ing feeding and oviposition scars are not readily discernible high barriers as well as all fruit larger than 0.5 inch (1.3 and would rarely reduce the marketable grade of affected cm) in diameter remaining on the plants at the last harvest fruit. The most destructive injury occurs when larvae hatch also were collected. All fruit were examined for damage by and migrate to the seed mass where they feed on the core beet armyworm larvae and external feeding/oviposition and developing seeds. If fruit are small when infested, they scars and internal feeding damage by the pepper weevil. may drop from the plant before maturing. Older fruit may The numbers of beet armyworm larvae and larvae, pupae support the complete development of concealed larvae and, and adults of the pepper weevil inside the fruit were if no secondary rot or adult emergence holes are evident, counted. Percentage data were transformed arcsine may be harvested and enter the marketplace. Subsequent discovery of infested fruit could jeopardize the marketability V(%) 0^1) prior to statistical analysis but are presented in of the entire lot. the original scale. While newer insecticides have been evaluated for control Sprays were applied weekly to run-off with either a 2.5 of the beet armyworm on other crops, they have not been gal (9.5 liter) hand-held stainless steel sprayer with a single evaluated on pepper. Janes (4) found that the pyrethroids adjustable cone nozzle at 40 psi (2.8 kg/cm) or a Soalo® decamethrin (FMC 45498), permethrin (Ambush®) and motorized mist blower which was operated at 20-25 mph air fenvalerate (Pydrin®) were highly effective in reducing flow (1300-1400 RPM). The amount of spray applied in sweet corn whorl damage inflicted by larvae of both the creased as plants grew and ranged from ca. 95-125 gal/acre beet armyworm and fall armyworm, 5. frugiperda (J. E. (889-1169 liters/ha). Smith). DuRant (2) showed that profenofos (Curacron®), fenvalerate, sulprofos (Bolstar®), acephate (Orthene®) and Results and Discussion methomyl (Lannate®) reduced the number of beet army- Few or no pepper weevils were present in the winter worm larvae on cotton. 1978-79 or spring 1981 experiments whereas few or no beet armyworm larvae were present in the spring 1980 and 1982 iFlorida Agricultural Experiment Stations Journal Series No. 4268. experiments. Consequently, only data for the respective Mention of a proprietary product does not imply its endorsement by the author or by the University of Florida. pests in these experiments are presented. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 95: 1982. 349 Plants sprayed with iienvalerate, permethrin (botii Table 3. Control of the pepper weevil on bell pepper at ARC-lm- formulations), methomyl, and acephate produced fewer mokalee, spring 1980z. fruit damaged by beet armyworm larvae than plants sprayed only with water in the winter 1978-79 experiment (Table 1). Damaged fruit (%)y However, significant reductions in numbers of larvae rela Pepper tive to the water check were found only in fruit from plants Insecticide and Lb. a.i./ External weevils/ sprayed with fenvalerate or methomyl. In the spring 1981 formulation 100 gal only Internal plant experiment, all insecticides evaluated, with the exception of oxamyl (Vydate®), resulted in fewer damaged fruit and Cryolite 96WP 8.0 21.2 ex 11.2 a 0.1a larvae than in the water check (Table 2). No treatment re Fenvalerate 2.4EC 0.1 5.0 a 35.5 be 3.5 abc Methamidophos 4EC 1.0 13.0 abc 39.3 bed 3.5 abc sulted in significantly increased yields of undamaged fruit Toxaphene 8EC 2.0 9.4 abc 44.8 bed 4.5 abc compared to the check. However, significantly fewer un Permethrin 3.2EC 0.1 6.3 a 57.0 bede 4.4 abc damaged fruit were harvested from plants sprayed with Chlorpyrifos 4EC 0.5 19.3 be 34.4 b 2.1 ab chlorpyrifos (Lorsban®) and cryolite (Kryocide®), thus in Methamidophos 4EC 0.5 10.9 abc 48.4 bed 4.6 abc Acephate 75SP 1.0 9.6 abc 53.6 bede 7.7 c dicating a possible phytotoxic effect. Permethrin 3.2EC 0.05 4.3 a 62.2 cde 6.7 be Acephate 75SP 0.5 9.7 ab 65.0 de 6.7 be Table 1. Control of the beet armyworm on bell pepper at AREC- Check (water) - 4.9 a 77.7 e 8.2 c Bradenton, winter 1978-79z. ^Seedlings were transplanted March 6, sprayed March 25, April 1, 9, 17, No. fruit/10 plants 24, 30, May 7, 13, 19, 27, and June 3, and harvested May 21, 27, June 3 No. and 10. Insecticide and Lb. a.i./ Un- larvae/ yPercentage date were transformed arcsine V% x .01 prior to analysis formulation 100 gal damaged Damaged 10 plants but are presented in the original scale. xMean separation within columns by Duncan's multiple range test, 5% level. Fenvalerate 2.4EC 0.1 163.5 N.S. 12.7 ay 0.7 a Permethrin 3.2EC 0.1 155.5 16.5 ab 2.0 ab sprayed with cryolite or chlorpyrifos also had significantly Methomyl 90SP 0.45 153.7 20.0 ab 0.7 a more external damage (feeding and oviposition scars) only. Permethrin 2EC 0.1 149.7 18.0 ab 2.2 ab Methamidophos 4EC 1.0 134.7 25.0 be 5.7 b This might indicate either that adult weevils continued to Endosulfan 2EC 0.5 122.2 48.2 d 6.2 b feed but oviposited less in treated pepper fruit or that eggs Carbaryl80WP 1.0 118.7 26.0 be 4.2 ab deposited in treated fruit failed to hatch. Although the ex Phosmet50WP 1.0 117.7 32.5 c 5.5 ab tent of internal fruit damage was greater in the spring 1982 Acephate 75SP 1.0 114.2 19.0 ab 5.0 ab Check (water) - 110.0 34.0 c 6.0 b experiment, fewer fruit from plants sprayed with cypermeth- rin (Ammo®), fenvalerate, chlorpyrifos, permethrin or cryo lite were damaged internally than fruit from plants sprayed ^Seedlings were transplanted September 7, sprayed November 3, 10, 17, 24, December 1, 8, 15, 22, January 5, 12, 19, 26 and February 2, and with water (Table 4).
Recommended publications
  • E0020 Common Beneficial Arthropods Found in Field Crops
    Common Beneficial Arthropods Found in Field Crops There are hundreds of species of insects and spi- mon in fields that have not been sprayed for ders that attack arthropod pests found in cotton, pests. When scouting, be aware that assassin bugs corn, soybeans, and other field crops. This publi- can deliver a painful bite. cation presents a few common and representative examples. With few exceptions, these beneficial Description and Biology arthropods are native and common in the south- The most common species of assassin bugs ern United States. The cumulative value of insect found in row crops (e.g., Zelus species) are one- predators and parasitoids should not be underes- half to three-fourths of an inch long and have an timated, and this publication does not address elongate head that is often cocked slightly important diseases that also attack insect and upward. A long beak originates from the front of mite pests. Without biological control, many pest the head and curves under the body. Most range populations would routinely reach epidemic lev- in color from light brownish-green to dark els in field crops. Insecticide applications typical- brown. Periodically, the adult female lays cylin- ly reduce populations of beneficial insects, often drical brown eggs in clusters. Nymphs are wing- resulting in secondary pest outbreaks. For this less and smaller than adults but otherwise simi- reason, you should use insecticides only when lar in appearance. Assassin bugs can easily be pest populations cannot be controlled with natu- confused with damsel bugs, but damsel bugs are ral and biological control agents.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Pathogens As Biological Control Agents: Back to the Future ⇑ L.A
    Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 132 (2015) 1–41 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Invertebrate Pathology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jip Insect pathogens as biological control agents: Back to the future ⇑ L.A. Lacey a, , D. Grzywacz b, D.I. Shapiro-Ilan c, R. Frutos d, M. Brownbridge e, M.S. Goettel f a IP Consulting International, Yakima, WA, USA b Agriculture Health and Environment Department, Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UK c U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 21 Dunbar Rd., Byron, GA 31008, USA d University of Montpellier 2, UMR 5236 Centre d’Etudes des agents Pathogènes et Biotechnologies pour la Santé (CPBS), UM1-UM2-CNRS, 1919 Route de Mendes, Montpellier, France e Vineland Research and Innovation Centre, 4890 Victoria Avenue North, Box 4000, Vineland Station, Ontario L0R 2E0, Canada f Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada1 article info abstract Article history: The development and use of entomopathogens as classical, conservation and augmentative biological Received 24 March 2015 control agents have included a number of successes and some setbacks in the past 15 years. In this forum Accepted 17 July 2015 paper we present current information on development, use and future directions of insect-specific Available online 27 July 2015 viruses, bacteria, fungi and nematodes as components of integrated pest management strategies for con- trol of arthropod pests of crops, forests, urban habitats, and insects of medical and veterinary importance. Keywords: Insect pathogenic viruses are a fruitful source of microbial control agents (MCAs), particularly for the con- Microbial control trol of lepidopteran pests.
    [Show full text]
  • Garden Pest Insects and Their Control
    Joseph Berger, Bugwood.org Curriculum Clemson University Bugwood.org Tomato pest management Kaushalya Amarasekare, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Entomology Department of Agric. and Environ. Sciences College of Agriculture Tennessee State University Nashville, TN Univ. of California-Statewide IPM Project Univ. of California-Statewide IPM Project Goal The goal of this training is to educate stakeholders on arthropods (pest insects and mites) that damage tomatoes and methods to manage them using integrated pest management (IPM) techniques Objectives Upon completion of this training, the participants will be able to 1) teach, 2) demonstrate and 3) guide growers, small farmers, backyard and community gardeners, master gardeners, and other stakeholders on management of pest arthropods in tomatoes Course Outline 1. Introduction: background information on tomatoes 2. Arthropod pests (insects and mites) of tomatoes a) Early season pests b) Pests during fruit set to harvest 3. Summary 4. References 1. Introduction Tomatoes Hornworm damage to foliage • An easy and popular vegetable to grow • Problems/issues: caused by nutrient deficiencies, diseases, and / or arthropod (insect and Julie Pioch Michigan State University Extension mite) pests • Need to assess the symptoms and use appropriate control measures • Good cultural practices: reduce or eliminate many Hornworm damage to fruits University of California Cooperative Extension- problems Master Gardeners of Sacramento County Tomatoes in Tennessee • 2012: TN ranked 6th in the nation for production
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies for Sustainable Control of Beet Armyworm, Spodoptera Exigua Insecticide Resistance Action Committee
    Strategies for Sustainable Control of Beet Armyworm, Spodoptera exigua Insecticide Resistance Action Committee www.irac-online.org Introduction. and Biological Background Integrated Resistance Management Resistance occurs because of repeated exposure of multiple pest generations to Beet armyworm Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) insecticide(s) with the same mode of action. Integrated resistance management is a highly dispersive, polyphagous species that can be a serious pest strategies take advantage of all available pest management options to decrease of vegetable, field and flower crops. Susceptible crops include insecticide selection pressure on insect populations. A combination of all available asparagus, cabbage, pepper, tomato, lettuce, celery, strawberry, tools for S. exigua management should be used to prevent the development of eggplant, sugar beet, alfalfa, cotton. insecticide resistance: Life cycle: • Chemical control - Always follow the directions for use on the label of each product. Pupa S. exigua damage to cabbage and tomato - Consult product label or IRACs website (www.irac-online.org) to determine the mode of action of each product. IRAC MoA Class Primary Site of Action Adult Resistance Mechanisms 1 Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors 2 GABA-gated Cl channel antagonists Several biochemical mechanisms may contribute to the evolution of 3 Sodium channel modulators insecticide resistance in beet armyworm. These mechanisms may act 4 Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists separately or in concert. 5 Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor allosteric activators 1. Enhanced metabolic detoxification, including increased activity of 6 Chloride channel activators 11 Microbial disruptors of insect midgut membranes esterases, mixed-function oxidases, and microsomal-O-demethylase. 13 Uncouplers of oxidative phosphorylation 2. Target site insensitivity. 15 Inhibitors of chitin biosynthesis, type 0 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Pest Management of Hellula Undalis Fabricius on Crucifers in Central Luzon, Philippines, with E,E-11,13- Hexadecadienal As Synthetic Sex Pheromone
    TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT MÜNCHEN Department für Pflanzenwissenschaften Lehrstuhl für Gemüsebau Integrated Pest Management of Hellula undalis Fabricius on Crucifers in Central Luzon, Philippines, with E,E-11,13- Hexadecadienal as Synthetic Sex Pheromone Sebastian Kalbfleisch Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Fakultät Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt der Technischen Universität München zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzender: Univ.-Prof. Dr. G. Forkmann Prüfer der Dissertation: 1. Univ.-Prof. Dr. W. H. Schnitzler 2. Univ.-Prof. Dr. R. Schopf (schriftliche Beurteilung) apl. Prof. Dr. R. Gerstmeier (mündliche Prüfung) Die Dissertation wurde am 13.12.2005 bei der Technischen Universität München eingereicht und durch die Fakultät Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt am 23.02.2006 angenommen. Danksagung Bedanken möchte ich mich bei Prof. Dr. W. H. Schnitzler für die Überlassung der Arbeit und das Vertrauen, das er in mich gesetzt hat, indem er mir freie Hand bei vielen Entscheidungen gegeben hat, sowie für die Unterstützung sowohl aus der Ferne als auch bei meinen Deutschland Aufenthalten in seinem Institut. Vielen Mitarbeitern des Lehrstuhls in Freising bin ich zu Dank verpflichtet, sowohl den Wissenschaftlern, als auch den Gärtnern und nicht zu vergessen, den Sekretärinnen Frau Hanna Rebai und Frau Ina Rustler. Besonders hervorheben möchte ich hier Frau Dr. Gerda Nitz. Ihre Hilfe war unersetzlich. Die Arbeit wäre von Anfang an gescheitert, oder zumindest auf einer ganz anderen Ebene abgelaufen, wenn Dr. Frans Griepink nicht den Lockstoff synthetisiert und mir überlassen hätte. Ihm bin ich sehr dankbar und selbstverständlich allen Mitarbeitern der Pherobank der Universität in Wageningen, Niederlande, die mit E,E-11,13-Hexadecadienal zu tun hatten.
    [Show full text]
  • Beet Armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Host Plant Preferences for Oviposition
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska 2002 Beet Armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Host Plant Preferences for Oviposition S. M. Greenberg Kika de la Garza Subtropical Agricultural Research Center, [email protected] T. W. Sappington Texas Agricultural Experiment Station T.-X. Liu Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub Part of the Agricultural Science Commons Greenberg, S. M.; Sappington, T. W.; and Liu, T.-X., "Beet Armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Host Plant Preferences for Oviposition" (2002). Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty. 719. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/719 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. POPULATION ECOLOGY Beet Armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Host Plant Preferences for Oviposition 1 2 2 S. M. GREENBERG, T. W. SAPPINGTON, M. SE´ TAMOU, AND T. -X. LIU Integrated Farming and Natural Resources Research Unit, Kika de la Garza Subtropical Agricultural Research Center, 2413 East Highway 83, Weslaco, TX 78596 Environ. Entomol. 31(1): 142Ð148 (2002) ABSTRACT Beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (Hu¨ bner), oviposition preferences were deter- mined on Þve host plants: cabbage (Brassica oleracea capitata L.), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.), pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.), and sunßower (Helianthus annuus L.) in no-choice, two-choice, and Þve-choice tests.
    [Show full text]
  • Beet Armyworm, Spodoptera Exigua (Hübner) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)1 J
    EENY105 Beet Armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)1 J. L. Capinera2 Introduction and Distribution The beet armyworm originated in Southeast Asia. It was first discovered in North America about 1876, when it was found in Oregon, and it reached Florida in 1924. It rarely overwinters in areas where frost kills its host plants. Thus, overwintering is generally limited to Arizona, Florida, and Texas. Nevertheless, beet armyworm invades the southern half of the United States (Maryland to Colorado to north- ern California, and south) annually. Except in greenhouses, it rarely is a pest except in southern states. Description and Life Cycle Figure 1. Newly hatched larva of the beet armyworm, Spodoptera Seasonal activity varies considerably according to climate. exigua (Hübner). In warm locations such as Florida, all stages can be found Credits: Lyle Buss, UF/IFAS throughout the year, although development rate and overall abundance are reduced during the winter months (Tingle Egg and Mitchell 1977). The life cycle can be completed in as Eggs are laid in clusters of 50 to 150 eggs per mass. Normal few as 24 days, and six generations have been reared during egg production is about 300 to 600 per female. Eggs are five months of summer weather in Florida (Wilson 1934). usually deposited on the lower surface of the leaf, and often near blossoms and the tip of the branch. The individual eggs are circular when viewed from above, but when examined from the side the egg is slightly peaked, tapering to a point. The eggs are greenish to white in color, and covered with a layer of whitish scales that gives the egg mass a fuzzy or cottony appearance.
    [Show full text]
  • Caterpillars (Lepidoptera)
    Caterpillars (Lepidoptera) Caterpillars (Lepidoptera) Mainly Families Noctuidae, Pyralidae, and Tortricidae by Dr.Richard Lindquist OARDC Dept. of Entomology The Ohio State University Many species of Lepidoptera attack flower and foliage crops. None of them are exclusively pests of greenhouse crops, but feed on a wide variety of agricultural and horticultural crops, inside and outside of greenhouses. Some major pests include beet armyworms (Spodoptera exigua), cabbage loopers (Trichoplusia ni), cutworms, such as the variegated cutworm (Peridroma saucia) (Family Noctuidae), European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis), (Family Pyralidae) and the omnivorous leafroller (Platynota stultana) (Family Tortricidae). Occasionally, other pests, including woolybear caterpillars (Family Arctiidae) find their way into greenhouses and cause localized plant damage A generalized life cycle of Lepidoptera is shown in Figure 1. Adults of the species listed above (except Arctiidae) are rather dull-colored moths that generally are most active at night or on dark days. Adults may be attracted into greenhouses by lights used in plant production. Sometimes moths enter greenhouses when outdoor crops are harvested, or decline because of adverse weather. Eggs are laid singly or in masses, generally on undersides of leaves. Larvae hatching from the eggs feed on plants - on leaves or flowers. Some may bore into stems, while others roll or tie leaves together. Some species (e.g. the beet armyworm) may do all of these things at certain times during their development. Beet armyworms (Figure 2), (Figure 3), (Figure 4), (Figure 5) are major pests of chrysanthemums and other plants in southern and western parts of the United States. Occasionally, plants in northern states are also attacked.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control September 12-16, 2005 Mark S. Hoddle, Compiler University of California, Riverside U.S.A. Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team—Morgantown, West Virginia United States Forest FHTET-2005-08 Department of Service September 2005 Agriculture Volume I Papers were submitted in an electronic format, and were edited to achieve a uniform format and typeface. Each contributor is responsible for the accuracy and content of his or her own paper. Statements of the contributors from outside of the U.S. Department of Agriculture may not necessarily reflect the policy of the Department. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. Any references to pesticides appearing in these papers does not constitute endorsement or recommendation of them by the conference sponsors, nor does it imply that uses discussed have been registered. Use of most pesticides is regulated by state and federal laws. Applicable regulations must be obtained from the appropriate regulatory agency prior to their use. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish and other wildlife if they are not handled and applied properly. Use all pesticides selectively and carefully. Follow recommended practices given on the label for use and disposal of pesticides and pesticide containers. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide to Predators, Parasies and Pathogens Attacking Insect And
    B--60476 7/8/05 1:17 PM Page 1 E-357 7-05 Field Guide to Predators, Parasites and Pathogens Attacking Insect and Mite Pests of Cotton RecognizingRecognizing thethe GoodGood BugsBugs inin CottonCotton by Allen Knutson and John Ruberson B--60476 7/8/05 1:17 PM Page 2 Field Guide to Predators, Parasites and Pathogens Attacking Insect and Mite Pests of Cotton by Allen Knutson and John Ruberson This publication was made possible in part through financial support provided by Cotton Incorporated. Cover photograph by W. Sterling of an immature (nymph) spined soldier bug, a predator of bollworms and other caterpillars in cotton. Authors: Allen Knutson, Professor and Extension Entomologist, Texas Cooperative Extension, Texas A&M Research and Extension Center-Dallas, 17360 Coit Road, Dallas, TX 75252 John Ruberson, Assistant Professor, Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, P.O. Box 748, Tifton, GA 31794. Editor: Edna M. Smith, Communications Specialist, Texas Cooperative Extension. Designer: David N. Lipe, Assistant Graphic Designer and Communications Specialist, Texas Cooperative Extension. Texas Cooperative Extension Edward G. Smith, Director The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas B--60476 7/8/05 1:17 PM Page 3 CONTENTS Introduction 3 Acknowledgments 4 How to Use This Book 6 Biology of Natural Enemies 7 Use of Natural Enemies 11 Sampling for Natural Enemies 12 Further Reading 15 Table of cotton pests and their natural enemies 16 Pesticides and Natural Enemies 20 Table of chemical classes and cotton insecticides 23 Predators
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Biological Control to Some Common Yard and Garden Pests
    Guide to the Biological Control of Some Common Yard and Garden Pest Insects in New Mexico COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND HOME ECONOMICS BRINGING SCIENCE TO YOUR Cooperative Extension Service • Circular 607 LIFE Guide to the Biological Control of Some Common Yard and Garden Pest Insects in New Mexico Joe Ellington, Tracey Carrillo, John White, Carol Sutherland, David Richman, Jeff Drake and Scott Bundy 1 Introduction learn to recognize those species that are Sometimes insects, mites or their relatives landscape pests and, perhaps, even some limit enjoyment of our landscape and garden species that are considered beneficial. Some of plants. We are familiar with pests that infest the less common and smaller pest species and fruit, vegetables, flowers and foliage or make their natural enemies may offer special plants wither, change colors, develop spots or challenges for identification and management. streaks or even die. But just as pests damage But further study, experience and observation some plants, those same pests probably have can help in manipulating them. one or more natural enemies that limit their In IPM, a variety of pest control numbers and their damage. measures are used to reduce pest “Biological control” of pests involves populations below damaging levels. Many either natural or human-assisted control of tools are available, but some will be more certain pest species by predators, parasites valuable, manageable, available or (parasitoids, as defined below) or pathogens. affordable than others. Some tools for This circular outlines important definitions, home gardeners include: concepts and examples of biological control • Sanitation-cleaning: Remove or of some common yard and garden pests in destroy debris if it is infested, or New Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Pest Status and Management of Beet Armyworm, Spodoptera Exigua (Hubner), on Cotton in Louisiana
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1997 Pest Status and Management of Beet Armyworm, Spodoptera Exigua (Hubner), on Cotton in Louisiana. Victor James Mascarenhas Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Mascarenhas, Victor James, "Pest Status and Management of Beet Armyworm, Spodoptera Exigua (Hubner), on Cotton in Louisiana." (1997). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 6582. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/6582 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type o f computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]