DOCSLIB.ORG

Beet Armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Host Plant Preferences for Oviposition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Beet Armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Host Plant Preferences for Oviposition University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska 2002 Beet Armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Host Plant Preferences for Oviposition S. M. Greenberg Kika de la Garza Subtropical Agricultural Research Center, [email protected] T. W. Sappington Texas Agricultural Experiment Station T.-X. Liu Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub Part of the Agricultural Science Commons Greenberg, S. M.; Sappington, T. W.; and Liu, T.-X., "Beet Armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Host Plant Preferences for Oviposition" (2002). Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty. 719. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/719 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. POPULATION ECOLOGY Beet Armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Host Plant Preferences for Oviposition 1 2 2 S. M. GREENBERG, T. W. SAPPINGTON, M. SE´ TAMOU, AND T. -X. LIU Integrated Farming and Natural Resources Research Unit, Kika de la Garza Subtropical Agricultural Research Center, 2413 East Highway 83, Weslaco, TX 78596 Environ. Entomol. 31(1): 142Ð148 (2002) ABSTRACT Beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (Hu¨ bner), oviposition preferences were deter- mined on Þve host plants: cabbage (Brassica oleracea capitata L.), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.), pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.), and sunßower (Helianthus annuus L.) in no-choice, two-choice, and Þve-choice tests. Tests were conducted in the laboratory, greenhouse, and Þeld cages. Oviposition preferences were compared on the basis of two measure- ments, the proportion of eggs laid on the plants to total that were deposited, and the oviposition preference index deÞned as [(number of eggs laid on the plant) - (number of eggs laid on the cage)] ϫ 100/total number of eggs laid. The proportion of eggs laid on the plants to total that were deposited was highest for pigweed and lowest for cabbage in all tests. Beet armyworm females were signiÞcantly deterred from laying eggs on cabbage and sunßower, while pigweed and cotton elicited a positive oviposition preference. Pepper tended to be neutral or slightly unattractive. Apparent interactions among plant species in choice tests produced measurable shifts in oviposition preference. Most notably, female response to pepper was enhanced in the presence of cotton or pigweed. Egg masses laid on the plants contained signiÞcantly higher numbers of eggs than those laid on the surface of the cage, except in the case of cabbage leaves. Knowledge of hierarchies of host plant oviposition preference by beet armyworm females will be useful in understanding the population dynamics of this important agricultural pest, and for developing effective monitoring and management strategies. KEY WORDS Spodoptera exigua, beet armyworm, host plants, oviposition preference THE BEET ARMYWORM, Spodoptera exigua (Hu¨ bner), is a interactions is that of host preference for oviposition, serious pest of numerous wild and cultivated plants but information on this subject with respect to S. throughout the world. It is a cosmopolitan species that exigua is limited. Several studies have addressed S. attacks Ͼ90 plant species in North America, many of exigua oviposition behavior in no-choice situations which are crop plants (Pearson 1982). Insecticides (Mitchell and Heath 1985, Smits et al. 1986, Yoshida directed against the larval stage of beet armyworm are and Parrella 1991, Sappington et al. 2001, Tisdale and the primary method of control, but high tolerance to Sappington 2001), but information is needed regard- most insecticides and associated environmental prob- ing relative preferences when in the presence of mul- lems may jeopardize their continued use (Brewer and tiple potential hosts. Our objectives were to evaluate Trumble 1991, Burris et al. 1994, Sparks et al. 1996, beet armyworm oviposition preferences and egg dep- Mascarenhas et al. 1996, 1998). Therefore, control osition patterns among selected crop and weed spe- programs should not rely solely on insecticides, and cies common to the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas. alternative control strategies that prevent the devel- opment of population outbreaks or reduce the cost of Materials and Methods management are needed. Development of effective alternative strategies for Host Plants and Experimental Conditions. Five managing the beet armyworm will require a thorough plant species were used in the study: cabbage (Bras- knowledge of the biological interactions of the insect sica oleracea capitata L.) (Earliana, W. Atlee Burpee, and its hosts. A very important component of such Warminster, PA), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) (DPL-50, Delta Pine Land, Scott, MS), bell pepper This article reports the results of research only. Mention of a (Capsicum annuum L.) (Capistrano, Peto Seed, Sati- commercial or proprietary product does not constitute an endorse- coy, CA), pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.), and ment or a recommendation for its use by USDA. 1E-mail: [email protected]. wild sunßower (Helianthus annuus L.). Pigweed and 2 Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, 2415 East Highway 83, sunßower seeds were collected from local wild plants Weslaco, TX 78596. the previous fall (1999). These plants were selected 0046-225X/02/0142Ð0148$02.00/0 ᭧ 2002 Entomological Society of America February 2002 GREENBERG ET AL.: BEET ARMYWORM OVIPOSITION PREFERENCES 143 based on their importance as cultivated crops (cab- eggs laid on the plants and on the walls of the cage. bage, cotton, and pepper) or their wide distribution as One cage of each plant species was a replication, and weeds (pigweed and wild sunßower) in the Lower Rio there were 16 total replications. Replications were Grande Valley of Texas, as well as their known asso- accumulated two at a time in a series of eight repeated ciations with the beet armyworm. Plants were grown experiments. in 30-cm pots in sunshine mixture #1 (SunGro Hor- Acceptability of intact plants for oviposition were ticulture, Elma, MB, Canada) for laboratory and similarly examined in the greenhouse. Two pots, each greenhouse tests, but were also planted directly in the containing two plants of a given species, were placed soil in Þeld cages. For greenhouse and Þeld tests, we in a screened cage (1 m long by 0.6 m wide by 1 m used intact 30- to 35-d-old plants; in laboratory tests we high). Five 2-d-old mated females were released in used leaves excised from the central canopy of those each cage and allowed to oviposit for 3 d. Four cups, plants. Laboratory and greenhouse experiments were each containing a cotton ball soaked with 10% sucrose, conducted at 26 Ϯ 2ЊC and a photoperiod of 12:12 were placed in each cage for adult feeding. The num- (L:D) h. The greenhouse tests were conducted in ber of egg masses laid on the plants and on the cage January and February and the photophase was length- were recorded daily. One cage containing four plants ened to 12 h by artiÞcial lighting. of a given species was a replication, and there were Insects and Measures of Oviposition Preference. eight total replications. Replications were accumu- Beet armyworm adults were obtained from a labora- lated two at a time in a series of four repeated exper- tory colony maintained at the Kika de la Garza Sub- iments. tropical Agricultural Research Center in Weslaco, TX. Two-Choice Tests. All possible paired combinations They had been reared exclusively on a soybean-wheat of cabbage, cotton, pepper, pigweed, and sunßower germ diet (Shaver and Raulston 1971) for Ϸ3 yr. Spa- were tested, using excised leaves in laboratory and tial placement of egg masses on cotton plants by moths intact plants in greenhouse experiments. In the labo- from this same colony was not grossly different than ratory study, two excised leaves (in ßoral aquapics), that by wild moths (Sappington et al. 2001). We rea- one leaf of each species of a given combination, were soned that the use of uniform insects reared on a placed in a plastic cage. One cage represented one neutral diet would help avoid potentially confounding replication of that combination. Each experiment, effects of dietary history on host plant preference. consisting of one replication of all possible combina- We measured and compared oviposition prefer- tions, was performed at one time, and the experiment ences of the beet armyworm on various host plants was repeated four times. using two different measures. The Þrst measure was In the greenhouse tests, each species of a paired the proportion of the total number of eggs laid that combination was represented by two pots, each con- were deposited on the plant surface. For this measure taining two plants. Thus, each cage contained a total a value Ͼ0.5 was interpreted as an indication the host of four pots. One cage of each possible combination plant was attractive for oviposition. We also used the was a replication. Each experiment consisted of one oviposition preference index of Grant and Langevin replication each of all possible combinations. The ex- (1995): [(number of eggs laid on host plant) Ϫ (num- periment was repeated three times. ber of eggs laid on cage)] ϫ 100/total number of eggs Numbers of beet armyworm females, and methods oviposited. The advantage of the oviposition prefer- of introduction, feeding, and monitoring oviposition ence index over a simple ratio is that it has a Þxed range were as described for the no-choice laboratory and of Ϫ100 to ϩ100, so that a negative value indicates greenhouse tests. Females were allowed to oviposit for oviposition deterrence and a positive value indicates three nights. stimulation. Values not signiÞcantly different from Five-Choice Tests.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • E0020 Common Beneficial Arthropods Found in Field Crops
    Common Beneficial Arthropods Found in Field Crops There are hundreds of species of insects and spi- mon in fields that have not been sprayed for ders that attack arthropod pests found in cotton, pests. When scouting, be aware that assassin bugs corn, soybeans, and other field crops. This publi- can deliver a painful bite. cation presents a few common and representative examples. With few exceptions, these beneficial Description and Biology arthropods are native and common in the south- The most common species of assassin bugs ern United States. The cumulative value of insect found in row crops (e.g., Zelus species) are one- predators and parasitoids should not be underes- half to three-fourths of an inch long and have an timated, and this publication does not address elongate head that is often cocked slightly important diseases that also attack insect and upward. A long beak originates from the front of mite pests. Without biological control, many pest the head and curves under the body. Most range populations would routinely reach epidemic lev- in color from light brownish-green to dark els in field crops. Insecticide applications typical- brown. Periodically, the adult female lays cylin- ly reduce populations of beneficial insects, often drical brown eggs in clusters. Nymphs are wing- resulting in secondary pest outbreaks. For this less and smaller than adults but otherwise simi- reason, you should use insecticides only when lar in appearance. Assassin bugs can easily be pest populations cannot be controlled with natu- confused with damsel bugs, but damsel bugs are ral and biological control agents.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Pathogens As Biological Control Agents: Back to the Future ⇑ L.A
    Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 132 (2015) 1–41 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Invertebrate Pathology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jip Insect pathogens as biological control agents: Back to the future ⇑ L.A. Lacey a, , D. Grzywacz b, D.I. Shapiro-Ilan c, R. Frutos d, M. Brownbridge e, M.S. Goettel f a IP Consulting International, Yakima, WA, USA b Agriculture Health and Environment Department, Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UK c U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 21 Dunbar Rd., Byron, GA 31008, USA d University of Montpellier 2, UMR 5236 Centre d’Etudes des agents Pathogènes et Biotechnologies pour la Santé (CPBS), UM1-UM2-CNRS, 1919 Route de Mendes, Montpellier, France e Vineland Research and Innovation Centre, 4890 Victoria Avenue North, Box 4000, Vineland Station, Ontario L0R 2E0, Canada f Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada1 article info abstract Article history: The development and use of entomopathogens as classical, conservation and augmentative biological Received 24 March 2015 control agents have included a number of successes and some setbacks in the past 15 years. In this forum Accepted 17 July 2015 paper we present current information on development, use and future directions of insect-specific Available online 27 July 2015 viruses, bacteria, fungi and nematodes as components of integrated pest management strategies for con- trol of arthropod pests of crops, forests, urban habitats, and insects of medical and veterinary importance. Keywords: Insect pathogenic viruses are a fruitful source of microbial control agents (MCAs), particularly for the con- Microbial control trol of lepidopteran pests.
    [Show full text]
  • Garden Pest Insects and Their Control
    Joseph Berger, Bugwood.org Curriculum Clemson University Bugwood.org Tomato pest management Kaushalya Amarasekare, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Entomology Department of Agric. and Environ. Sciences College of Agriculture Tennessee State University Nashville, TN Univ. of California-Statewide IPM Project Univ. of California-Statewide IPM Project Goal The goal of this training is to educate stakeholders on arthropods (pest insects and mites) that damage tomatoes and methods to manage them using integrated pest management (IPM) techniques Objectives Upon completion of this training, the participants will be able to 1) teach, 2) demonstrate and 3) guide growers, small farmers, backyard and community gardeners, master gardeners, and other stakeholders on management of pest arthropods in tomatoes Course Outline 1. Introduction: background information on tomatoes 2. Arthropod pests (insects and mites) of tomatoes a) Early season pests b) Pests during fruit set to harvest 3. Summary 4. References 1. Introduction Tomatoes Hornworm damage to foliage • An easy and popular vegetable to grow • Problems/issues: caused by nutrient deficiencies, diseases, and / or arthropod (insect and Julie Pioch Michigan State University Extension mite) pests • Need to assess the symptoms and use appropriate control measures • Good cultural practices: reduce or eliminate many Hornworm damage to fruits University of California Cooperative Extension- problems Master Gardeners of Sacramento County Tomatoes in Tennessee • 2012: TN ranked 6th in the nation for production
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies for Sustainable Control of Beet Armyworm, Spodoptera Exigua Insecticide Resistance Action Committee
    Strategies for Sustainable Control of Beet Armyworm, Spodoptera exigua Insecticide Resistance Action Committee www.irac-online.org Introduction. and Biological Background Integrated Resistance Management Resistance occurs because of repeated exposure of multiple pest generations to Beet armyworm Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) insecticide(s) with the same mode of action. Integrated resistance management is a highly dispersive, polyphagous species that can be a serious pest strategies take advantage of all available pest management options to decrease of vegetable, field and flower crops. Susceptible crops include insecticide selection pressure on insect populations. A combination of all available asparagus, cabbage, pepper, tomato, lettuce, celery, strawberry, tools for S. exigua management should be used to prevent the development of eggplant, sugar beet, alfalfa, cotton. insecticide resistance: Life cycle: • Chemical control - Always follow the directions for use on the label of each product. Pupa S. exigua damage to cabbage and tomato - Consult product label or IRACs website (www.irac-online.org) to determine the mode of action of each product. IRAC MoA Class Primary Site of Action Adult Resistance Mechanisms 1 Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors 2 GABA-gated Cl channel antagonists Several biochemical mechanisms may contribute to the evolution of 3 Sodium channel modulators insecticide resistance in beet armyworm. These mechanisms may act 4 Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists separately or in concert. 5 Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor allosteric activators 1. Enhanced metabolic detoxification, including increased activity of 6 Chloride channel activators 11 Microbial disruptors of insect midgut membranes esterases, mixed-function oxidases, and microsomal-O-demethylase. 13 Uncouplers of oxidative phosphorylation 2. Target site insensitivity. 15 Inhibitors of chitin biosynthesis, type 0 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Pest Management of Hellula Undalis Fabricius on Crucifers in Central Luzon, Philippines, with E,E-11,13- Hexadecadienal As Synthetic Sex Pheromone
    TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT MÜNCHEN Department für Pflanzenwissenschaften Lehrstuhl für Gemüsebau Integrated Pest Management of Hellula undalis Fabricius on Crucifers in Central Luzon, Philippines, with E,E-11,13- Hexadecadienal as Synthetic Sex Pheromone Sebastian Kalbfleisch Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Fakultät Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt der Technischen Universität München zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzender: Univ.-Prof. Dr. G. Forkmann Prüfer der Dissertation: 1. Univ.-Prof. Dr. W. H. Schnitzler 2. Univ.-Prof. Dr. R. Schopf (schriftliche Beurteilung) apl. Prof. Dr. R. Gerstmeier (mündliche Prüfung) Die Dissertation wurde am 13.12.2005 bei der Technischen Universität München eingereicht und durch die Fakultät Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt am 23.02.2006 angenommen. Danksagung Bedanken möchte ich mich bei Prof. Dr. W. H. Schnitzler für die Überlassung der Arbeit und das Vertrauen, das er in mich gesetzt hat, indem er mir freie Hand bei vielen Entscheidungen gegeben hat, sowie für die Unterstützung sowohl aus der Ferne als auch bei meinen Deutschland Aufenthalten in seinem Institut. Vielen Mitarbeitern des Lehrstuhls in Freising bin ich zu Dank verpflichtet, sowohl den Wissenschaftlern, als auch den Gärtnern und nicht zu vergessen, den Sekretärinnen Frau Hanna Rebai und Frau Ina Rustler. Besonders hervorheben möchte ich hier Frau Dr. Gerda Nitz. Ihre Hilfe war unersetzlich. Die Arbeit wäre von Anfang an gescheitert, oder zumindest auf einer ganz anderen Ebene abgelaufen, wenn Dr. Frans Griepink nicht den Lockstoff synthetisiert und mir überlassen hätte. Ihm bin ich sehr dankbar und selbstverständlich allen Mitarbeitern der Pherobank der Universität in Wageningen, Niederlande, die mit E,E-11,13-Hexadecadienal zu tun hatten.
    [Show full text]
  • Beet Armyworm, Spodoptera Exigua (Hübner) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)1 J
    EENY105 Beet Armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)1 J. L. Capinera2 Introduction and Distribution The beet armyworm originated in Southeast Asia. It was first discovered in North America about 1876, when it was found in Oregon, and it reached Florida in 1924. It rarely overwinters in areas where frost kills its host plants. Thus, overwintering is generally limited to Arizona, Florida, and Texas. Nevertheless, beet armyworm invades the southern half of the United States (Maryland to Colorado to north- ern California, and south) annually. Except in greenhouses, it rarely is a pest except in southern states. Description and Life Cycle Figure 1. Newly hatched larva of the beet armyworm, Spodoptera Seasonal activity varies considerably according to climate. exigua (Hübner). In warm locations such as Florida, all stages can be found Credits: Lyle Buss, UF/IFAS throughout the year, although development rate and overall abundance are reduced during the winter months (Tingle Egg and Mitchell 1977). The life cycle can be completed in as Eggs are laid in clusters of 50 to 150 eggs per mass. Normal few as 24 days, and six generations have been reared during egg production is about 300 to 600 per female. Eggs are five months of summer weather in Florida (Wilson 1934). usually deposited on the lower surface of the leaf, and often near blossoms and the tip of the branch. The individual eggs are circular when viewed from above, but when examined from the side the egg is slightly peaked, tapering to a point. The eggs are greenish to white in color, and covered with a layer of whitish scales that gives the egg mass a fuzzy or cottony appearance.
    [Show full text]
  • Caterpillars (Lepidoptera)
    Caterpillars (Lepidoptera) Caterpillars (Lepidoptera) Mainly Families Noctuidae, Pyralidae, and Tortricidae by Dr.Richard Lindquist OARDC Dept. of Entomology The Ohio State University Many species of Lepidoptera attack flower and foliage crops. None of them are exclusively pests of greenhouse crops, but feed on a wide variety of agricultural and horticultural crops, inside and outside of greenhouses. Some major pests include beet armyworms (Spodoptera exigua), cabbage loopers (Trichoplusia ni), cutworms, such as the variegated cutworm (Peridroma saucia) (Family Noctuidae), European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis), (Family Pyralidae) and the omnivorous leafroller (Platynota stultana) (Family Tortricidae). Occasionally, other pests, including woolybear caterpillars (Family Arctiidae) find their way into greenhouses and cause localized plant damage A generalized life cycle of Lepidoptera is shown in Figure 1. Adults of the species listed above (except Arctiidae) are rather dull-colored moths that generally are most active at night or on dark days. Adults may be attracted into greenhouses by lights used in plant production. Sometimes moths enter greenhouses when outdoor crops are harvested, or decline because of adverse weather. Eggs are laid singly or in masses, generally on undersides of leaves. Larvae hatching from the eggs feed on plants - on leaves or flowers. Some may bore into stems, while others roll or tie leaves together. Some species (e.g. the beet armyworm) may do all of these things at certain times during their development. Beet armyworms (Figure 2), (Figure 3), (Figure 4), (Figure 5) are major pests of chrysanthemums and other plants in southern and western parts of the United States. Occasionally, plants in northern states are also attacked.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control September 12-16, 2005 Mark S. Hoddle, Compiler University of California, Riverside U.S.A. Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team—Morgantown, West Virginia United States Forest FHTET-2005-08 Department of Service September 2005 Agriculture Volume I Papers were submitted in an electronic format, and were edited to achieve a uniform format and typeface. Each contributor is responsible for the accuracy and content of his or her own paper. Statements of the contributors from outside of the U.S. Department of Agriculture may not necessarily reflect the policy of the Department. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. Any references to pesticides appearing in these papers does not constitute endorsement or recommendation of them by the conference sponsors, nor does it imply that uses discussed have been registered. Use of most pesticides is regulated by state and federal laws. Applicable regulations must be obtained from the appropriate regulatory agency prior to their use. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish and other wildlife if they are not handled and applied properly. Use all pesticides selectively and carefully. Follow recommended practices given on the label for use and disposal of pesticides and pesticide containers. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide to Predators, Parasies and Pathogens Attacking Insect And
    B--60476 7/8/05 1:17 PM Page 1 E-357 7-05 Field Guide to Predators, Parasites and Pathogens Attacking Insect and Mite Pests of Cotton RecognizingRecognizing thethe GoodGood BugsBugs inin CottonCotton by Allen Knutson and John Ruberson B--60476 7/8/05 1:17 PM Page 2 Field Guide to Predators, Parasites and Pathogens Attacking Insect and Mite Pests of Cotton by Allen Knutson and John Ruberson This publication was made possible in part through financial support provided by Cotton Incorporated. Cover photograph by W. Sterling of an immature (nymph) spined soldier bug, a predator of bollworms and other caterpillars in cotton. Authors: Allen Knutson, Professor and Extension Entomologist, Texas Cooperative Extension, Texas A&M Research and Extension Center-Dallas, 17360 Coit Road, Dallas, TX 75252 John Ruberson, Assistant Professor, Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, P.O. Box 748, Tifton, GA 31794. Editor: Edna M. Smith, Communications Specialist, Texas Cooperative Extension. Designer: David N. Lipe, Assistant Graphic Designer and Communications Specialist, Texas Cooperative Extension. Texas Cooperative Extension Edward G. Smith, Director The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas B--60476 7/8/05 1:17 PM Page 3 CONTENTS Introduction 3 Acknowledgments 4 How to Use This Book 6 Biology of Natural Enemies 7 Use of Natural Enemies 11 Sampling for Natural Enemies 12 Further Reading 15 Table of cotton pests and their natural enemies 16 Pesticides and Natural Enemies 20 Table of chemical classes and cotton insecticides 23 Predators
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Biological Control to Some Common Yard and Garden Pests
    Guide to the Biological Control of Some Common Yard and Garden Pest Insects in New Mexico COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND HOME ECONOMICS BRINGING SCIENCE TO YOUR Cooperative Extension Service • Circular 607 LIFE Guide to the Biological Control of Some Common Yard and Garden Pest Insects in New Mexico Joe Ellington, Tracey Carrillo, John White, Carol Sutherland, David Richman, Jeff Drake and Scott Bundy 1 Introduction learn to recognize those species that are Sometimes insects, mites or their relatives landscape pests and, perhaps, even some limit enjoyment of our landscape and garden species that are considered beneficial. Some of plants. We are familiar with pests that infest the less common and smaller pest species and fruit, vegetables, flowers and foliage or make their natural enemies may offer special plants wither, change colors, develop spots or challenges for identification and management. streaks or even die. But just as pests damage But further study, experience and observation some plants, those same pests probably have can help in manipulating them. one or more natural enemies that limit their In IPM, a variety of pest control numbers and their damage. measures are used to reduce pest “Biological control” of pests involves populations below damaging levels. Many either natural or human-assisted control of tools are available, but some will be more certain pest species by predators, parasites valuable, manageable, available or (parasitoids, as defined below) or pathogens. affordable than others. Some tools for This circular outlines important definitions, home gardeners include: concepts and examples of biological control • Sanitation-cleaning: Remove or of some common yard and garden pests in destroy debris if it is infested, or New Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Pest Status and Management of Beet Armyworm, Spodoptera Exigua (Hubner), on Cotton in Louisiana
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1997 Pest Status and Management of Beet Armyworm, Spodoptera Exigua (Hubner), on Cotton in Louisiana. Victor James Mascarenhas Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Mascarenhas, Victor James, "Pest Status and Management of Beet Armyworm, Spodoptera Exigua (Hubner), on Cotton in Louisiana." (1997). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 6582. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/6582 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type o f computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Armyworms and Cucurbit Wilts
    Armyworms and Cucurbit Wilts Armyworms Description Armyworms are being seen throughout rural areas in Utah. Armyworms are the larval stage of night- flying moths in the Noctuidae family. In Utah, four common species we see are the Beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua), Bertha armyworm (Mamestra configurata), Fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda), and the Western yellow-striped armyworm (Spodoptera praefica). Adults moths range from mottled grey and brown with light-colored markings. Larvae vary in color and develop through 6-9 instars (see images below). Fall Armyworm (Kansas State University) Western Yellowstriped Armywrom (University of Florida) Bertha Armyworm (David Gent, USDA) Beet Armyworm (University of Florida) Monitoring Several vegetable hosts are susceptible to armyworm attacks. These include artichoke, asparagus, beans, beets, broccoli, Brussels sprouts, cabbage, carrot, cauliflower, celery, collards, corn, cucumber, garlic, kale, lettuce, melon, onion, parsley, parsnip, pea, pepper, potato, radish, rhubarb, spinach, sweet potato, Swiss chard, and tomatoes. Armyworms also feed on many herbaceous ornamentals and weeds. Vegetable growers living in rural areas near alfalfa fields are also vulnerable to larger infestations as alfalfa serves as the main host crop. Commercial growers last season were hit hard with armyworms populations due to weather. Monitor now and look for eggs laid on the leaves of the crops or weeds. Young larvae typically are found near the egg masses in groups. As the larvae mature they disperse, moving towards the center of the plant. Damage Armyworm larvae have chewing mouthparts, which they use to skeletonize foliage, create irregular holes, and shred foliage. Larvae have also been observed tunneling in to corn ears or the heads of leafy vegetables.
    [Show full text]