DOCSLIB.ORG

Montenegro: Regime in Podgorica Constantly Criminalized

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Montenegro: Regime in Podgorica Constantly Criminalized HELSBuINlleKtiIn Helsinki Comm it tee for Human Right s in Serbia R i g e o d F e re s t r. # 2 0 , 1 1 0 0 0 B e l g r a d e , S e rb i a t e l ./ fa x + 3 8 1 1 1 3 0 3 2 4 0 8 ; e - m a i l :o ffi c e @ h e l s i n k i . o rg . rs ww w . h e l s i n k i . o r g . rs No 59 ● February 2010 Montenegro: Regime in Podgorica Constantly Criminalized Relations between Serbia and should be accorded. With an Montenegro aggravated after approach as such, Serbia overtly Montenegro’s recognition of Kosovo supports the pro-Serb opposition in (October 2008) to which Belgrade Montenegro, which has been playing responded by expelling the on the thesis about allegedly Montenegrin Ambassador. When jeopardized Serb people, Serbhood Podgorica and Prishtina established and Serb language. diplomatic relations (November 2009) Belgrade withdrew its ambassador to Montenegro. Montenegrin President Filip Vujanovic paid an official Belgrade to Serbia in May 2009, but the visit itself did not contribute to full normalization of bilateral relations. Besides, Montenegro definitely opted for Euro-Atlantic integrations and applied for EU candidacy, NATO endorsed a plan of action for Montenegro’s membership (December 2009) and, most Filip Vujanovic importantly, the Montenegrin parliament already adopted a declaration condemning the For its part, Serbia constantly plays Srebrenica genocide. on the story about Montenegrin Premier Milo Djukanovic’s alleged Serbia still aspires to play an involvement in cigarette trafficking arbiter in some exclusively internal and “the criminogenic nature” of the affairs of its neighbor. Such tendency incumbent regime in Podgorica. This is notably mirrored in Belgrade’s was particularly evident after “concern” for Serbs in Montenegro Montenegrin parliamentary elections and their status. Actually, it tries to in March 2009, when the ruling “order” a kind of status local Serbs coalition won an absolute majority of vote. To justify the last in the series of its electoral defeats, Montenegrin opposition claims they were rigged, whereas electoral campaigns mock community unfortunately ensuring Djukanovic victory are supported by the state.” 2 funded through criminal activities. The media in Serbia are According to the pro-Serb opposition, constantly campaigning against the outcome of the independence Montenegrin tourism: they play on referendum in 2006 was due to the the thesis about high prices, bad hookup between the regime and conditions and primitive service. organized crime. Such and similar Their list of the reasons why one claims and assaults at the ruling should not vacation at Montenegrin coalition, notably at Djukanovic, find coast goes as far as including a strong echo in Serbian media. Montenegro’s recognition of Kosovo independence. The year 2008, as the year of Montenegro’s high tourism, will be remembered by “high expectations falling short,” they gloated. Serbia’s diplomatic claims Serbia strongly responded to Montenegro’s decision to establish Milo Djukanovic diplomatic relations with Prishtina once it recognized the new state. It promptly messaged the Montenegrin The Serb Orthodox Church /SPC/ government that opening of a recognizes neither the Montenegrin Montenegrin embassy in Prishtina state nor the Montenegrin nation. further aggravated bilateral relations. SPC would neither recognize the Zoran Lutovac, Serbia’s ambassador Montenegrin Orthodox Church, to Montenegro, demanded which attracts more and more postponement of diplomatic relations believers and adherents. SPC openly with Kosovo until the ruling of the interferes into political processes in International Court of Justice. Montenegro despite Montenegro’s constitutional, secular character. Pro- Serbia requested to open three Serb parties in Montenegro have not consulates in Montenegro – in Herceg only been created by SPC but also, Novi, Niksic and Bar. Serbian Foreign like many other organizations, Minister Vuk Jeremic explained that operate under its influence. So, an Serbia was duty-bound to protect its Assembly of Serbs in Montenegro has nationals in Montenegro. The been established in the Moraca Montenegrin government turned monastery. Main promoter of SPC down the request as excessive – activities in Montenegro is Montenegro is a country too small to Metropolitan Amfilohije Radovic. host three consulates, one is quite enough, said the government. Then The newly elected SPC Belgrade warned Podgorica to think patriarch, Irinej, did not miss the twice before sending an ambassador opportunity to underline that to Serbia, coming from the political Montenegrins and Serbs were the structure that had won the March same people. “Separation of Serbia parliamentary elections. Premier Milo and Montenegro is senseless and Djukanovic responded by saying that irrational, given that we are the same was “a continued tendency to govern people with same roots,” 1 he said and Montenegro outside Montenegro.” called the Montenegrin church “a When the Montenegrin government 1 Kurir, January 27, 2010. 2 Blic, January 27, 2010. appointed Igor Jovovic ambassador to biggest portion – would not proceed Serbia, the Serbian media begun with such demand. On several running the stories about him being occasions, Serbian President Boris suspected for cigarette, booze and Tadic emphasized that Serbs could food smuggling in his capacity as not be a national minority in Montenegrin ambassador to Ethiopia. Montenegro. At the summit The Blic daily run a story headlined conference of South East European “Podgorica Sends a Smuggler for states in Cetinje, he said, “Serb roots Ambassador to Serbia.” 3 in Montenegro are deep and that’s a Serbia seizes every scholarly fact…Therefore, we cannot opportunity to belittle Montenegro’s accept that Serbs in Montenegro are independence. So, without any official treated as a national minority.” 5 It announcement and arrangements, was neither acceptable to him, he Foreign Minister Vuk Jeremic went to said, that the Serb language and Bijelo Polje to attend a ceremony culture in Montenegro are in the marking St. Sava Day. “Throughout minority. “Montenegrins in Serbia are history, Serbia and Montenegro were autochthonous people, the same as walking side by side and never Serbs in Montenegro,” said President quarreled…Togetherness between Tadic, adding, “Nobody has the right peoples of Serbia and Montenegro – to question Montenegrin identity in togetherness in religion, customs and Serbia, the same as no one could spiritual heritage – is indestructible,” possibly question Serbian identity in said Jeremic addressing the Montenegro.” He messaged that audience. 4 Serbia’s policy was not hegemonic, but Belgrade was only duty-bound to safeguard Serbian cultural heritage in all the countries in the region. 6 The leader of the parliamentary party – New Serb Democracy, Andrija Mandic, sided with Tadic. According to him, it was with the funds from the ruling Democratic Party of Socialists that the Serb Radical Party imposed the thesis about the status of a national Vuk Jeremic minority for Serbs. His party supports the Serbian government’s Serbs in Montenegro plan for the establishment of a regional assembly of diaspora and Serbs, which would be invested with authority in certain fields under a The pro-Serb opposition claims relevant law, he added. 7 special rights for the Serbs in Miodrag Jaksic, state Montenegro. However, it is divided secretary of the Ministry for Diaspora, over the issue. A smaller portion of claimed, “Serbs in Montenegro do not that opposition, actually the Serb enjoy even minimal constitutional Radical Party, advocates a national rights in the domains of culture, minority status for Serbs. With information, education and religion.” Belgrade’s support, the rest – the In response, the official Podgorica underlined that Montenegro was a civil state the constitution of which 3 Blic, September 4, 2009. guarantees expression of all 4 Vecernje Novosti, January 28, 2010. 5 Kurir, June 5, 2009. 6 Ibid. 7 Vecernje Novosti, June 1, 2009. differences and that Belgrade’s claims apprehended a Serb and his were ungrounded. 8 accountant, an Uruguayan, intent to The media in Serbia also load cocaine onto an ocean liner. constantly speculate the size of Serb While the investigation into the population in Montenegro. According background and masterminds of this to the correspondent for the Politika obviously well-organized mafia daily, only 13,000 Serbs work for operation is still on, a media war Montenegro’s educational against Montenegro is in full swing in institutions: a negligible percentage of Serbia. Darko Saric, the central figure them is engaged in 21 kindergartens, of the case for the time being, is 161 elementary schools and 49 suspected of having laundered the secondary schools, whereas they keep cocaine money in Serbia mostly low profile at the University to “avoid where he was buying real estate (in repressive actions.” 9 Vojvodina, in the first place), business premises, companies, hotels, lands, etc. The fact that not a single institution has suspected the Montenegro’s attitude towards source of these funds indicates that Kosovo Saric must have had powerful mentors in Serbia, too. Montenegro’s decision to establish “The Saric case” opened a new diplomatic relations with Kosovo chapter in the struggle against angered Belgrade. Such an act, said organized crime in Serbia and in the Foreign Minister Jeremic, region. Even President Tadic “undermines regional stability and commented it by saying, “Today, hinders the establishment of the best Serbia is under the attack of possible relations among neighbors.” organized crime, which cannot be “Podgorica’s decision to establish identified as Serb only. There is no diplomatic relations with the illegal, doubt that this criminal group was secessionist authorities in Prishtina closely connected with same groups cannot go unpunished,” he in South East Europe, as well as in threatened. 10 In the attempt to soothe the European Union and Latin Jeremic’s threatening statement, America.” 12 Dragoljub Micunovic, president of DS Political Council, said Serbia should not raise hell over diplomatic relations between Montenegro and Kosovo.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Monografija EPCG Za Web Low
    100 GODINA CRNOGORSKE ELEKTROPRIVREDE Autori Prof. dr Živko M. Andrijašević Prof. dr Zvezdan Folić Mr Dragutin Papović Izdavač Elektroprivreda Crne Gore AD Nikšić Za izdavača Srđan Kovačević Stručni konsultant Prof. dr Lazar Ljubiša Lektor i korektor Zuvdija Hodžić Prepress Vladimir Papić, Lutrex Podgorica Štampa Grafotisak Grude Tiraž 1000 CIP - Katalogizacija u publikaciji Centralna narodna biblioteka Crne Gore, Cetiwe 621.31(497.16)(091) АНДРИЈАШЕВИЋ, Живко М. [Sto] 100 godina crnogorske elektroprivrede / Živko M. Andrijašević, Zvezdan Folić, Dragutin Papović. - Nikšić : Elektroprivreda Crne Gore AD Nikšić, 2010 (Grude : Grafotisak) . - 256 str. : fotogr., faks; 32 cm Tiraž 1000. ISBN 978-9940-9295-0-3 1. Фолић, Звездан [аутор] 2. Паповић, Драгутин [аутор] а) Електропривреда - Црна Гора - Историја - COBISS.CG-ID 16237072 Živko M. Andrijašević Zvezdan Folić Dragutin Papović USE THIS LOGO VERSION ABOVE 4cm GODINA CRNOGORSKE ELEKTROPRIVREDE Nikšić 2010. PREDGOVOR Avgusta 1910. godine u Crnoj Gori je na najsvečaniji način, i u prisustvu velikog broja inostranih zvanica, obilježen jubilej knjaza Nikole – pedeset godina vladavine. Na dan jubileja, knjaz Nikola je proglašen za kralja, a Crna Gora za kraljevinu. U vrijeme ovog velikog jubileja, u Cetinju, crnogorskoj prijestolnici, puštena je u rad prva električna centrala za javne namjene. Grad je tada dobio električno osvjetljenje. Avgusta 2010. godine navršilo se sto godina od kada je na prostoru Crne Gore počela upotreba električne energije za javne svrhe (osvjetljenje naselja). Tim povodom, preduzeće “Elektroprivreda Crne Gore” odlučilo je da ovaj veliki jubilej – vijek elektrike u Crnoj Gori, obilježi nizom manifestacija, kao i da publikuje monografiju koja će prikazati istorijat ove privredne grane na prostoru Crne Gore tokom jednog vijeka.
    [Show full text]
  • PREDSJEDNIK RH STJEPAN MESIĆ DODIJELIO ODLIČJE DR. MILOŠU MILOŠEVIĆU Ponos Svima
    GLASILO HRVATA CRNE GORE Godina VI Broj 39-40 Lipanj-Srpanj 2008. Cijena 1 € ISSN 1800-5179 PREDSJEDNIK RH STJEPAN MESIĆ DODIJELIO ODLIČJE DR. MILOŠU MILOŠEVIĆU Ponos svima 1200 GODINA DOLASKA 880099.. moćiju Sv. Tripuna u Kotor 22000099.. DR. MILOŠ MILOŠEVIĆ Poštovani čitatelji Događaji su u lipnju i srpnju samo prestizali jedan drugog – dodjela odličja dr. Milošu Miloševiću; gostovanje Hrvat - skog narodnog kazališta Zagreb; Prvi regionalni susret urednika glasila manjinskih zajednica i njihovih medijskih partnera… Sve u Kotoru, na inicijativu i u organizaciji Hr - Plovidba morima vatskog građanskog društva Crne Gore. Nije bilo lako ; trebalo je danonoćno raditi na usaglašava - dokumenata nju svakog detalja. I kada je već izgledalo da su ovo ipak prekrupni „zalogaji“ za jednu NVO, u kojoj djeluju uglav - STR. 10 nom entuzijasti, počeli su se uključivati novi , mladi članovi PREDSJEDNIK SKUPŠTINE CRNE GORE društva. Svoju potporu nesebično su, i svojom nazočnošću i RANKO KRIVOKAPIĆ akcijama, dali prijatelji iz Dubrovnika, ministarstva kulture i medija dviju država , Općina Kotor, Veleposlanstvo i Kon - Uvijek spreman zulat RH. Gradonačelnica Kotora došla je da otvori Regionalni su - da pomognem sret urednika , iako pod terapijom i sa visokom temperatu - STR. 14 rom. Pomoćnik ministra Željko Rutović, diplomate Nebojša Kirigin i Radojko Nižić ostali su do kraja susreta i aktivno POVJERENSTVO RASPODIJELILO sudjelovali u diskusiji . Jedan od sudionika skupa prokomen - SREDSTVA MVPEI RH tirao je kako prvi puta vidi tako nešto kada je u pitanju vlast Boćari pregazili Držića i predstavnici diplomacije. Mediji, dopisnici svih dnevnih listova, radio i TV stanica, STR. 24 propratili su sve spomenute događaje, dali najave, priloge, intervjue. PRVI REGIONALNI SUSRET UREDNIKA Sada, kada je sve iza nas i još pristižu pozitivni odjeci, HGDCG je ponosno što je ( i ne prvi puta) odradilo vrije - Za jačanje uloge dan posao od značaja za međudržavne odnose i očuvanje manjinskih medija identiteta hrvatske zajednice u Crnoj Gori.
    [Show full text]
  • Nation Building - Montenegro
    Report Nation building - Montenegro For: Client name October 2011 CONTENTS How to read tables 5 Results 7 Background .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 What is your citizenship? ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Witch passports do you hold? If you have more than one please name all of them ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 10 Have you been born in Montenegro? .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 11 For how many years have you been living in this country? ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Second Quarterly Report on the State of Human Rights in Montenegro In
    YIHR QUARTERLY REPORT ON THE STATE OF HUMAN RIGHTS 2011 I Previous information The second quarterly report of Youth Initiative for Human Rights (YIHR) includes information collected during the period from April 1, 2011 and June 1, 2011. In our work, we used techniques of researching on the terrain, press clipping, analysis, interviews, and SOS phone line. YIHR conducts monitoring of human rights in Montenegro for the fifth year in a row and until nowadays, our organization published five annual reports and more quarterly reports that are available on our web site www.yihr.me . The report includes areas we have identified through our previous work as concerning ones, and the accent is on the state of human rights in practice. More detailed legal analysis of standards of human rights is being prepared for the annual report. The Report has been prepared by YIHR team, with financial and expert support of Civil Rights Defenders. At the time of preparation of this Report, cooperation with CAZAS, UNICEF, UNHCR and Association of People with Paraplegia in Pljevlja, Bijelo Polje and Rožaje, has been achieved, just as in preparation of previous quarterly report. Census was conducted in April, 2011. Statistical Office of Montenegro announced that Montenegro had 625.266 citizens, which was only 5.000 more than in 2003. The Court for Human Rights in Strasbourg rendered fifth verdict against Montenegro. Currently, there are 700 cases at the procedure, which is very large number in comparison with the number of citizens. The Government and other public bodies continued good cooperation and communication with NGO sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro: Vassal Or Sovereign?
    Scholars Crossing Faculty Publications and Presentations Helms School of Government January 2009 Montenegro: Vassal or Sovereign? Octavian Sofansky Stephen R. Bowers Liberty University, [email protected] Marion T. Doss, Jr. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/gov_fac_pubs Part of the Other Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons Recommended Citation Sofansky, Octavian; Bowers, Stephen R.; and Doss, Jr., Marion T., "Montenegro: Vassal or Sovereign?" (2009). Faculty Publications and Presentations. 28. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/gov_fac_pubs/28 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Helms School of Government at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Montenegro: Vassal or Sovereign? 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................ ................................ ............... 3 INTRODUCTION ................................ ................................ ......................... 4 STRATEGIC SIGNIFICANCE OF MONTENEGRO................................ .............. 6 INTERNAL POLITICAL DUALISM ................................ ................................ 12 RUSSIAN POLICY TOWARDS THE BALKANS................................ ............... 21 MULTILATERAL IMPLICATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Assembly Assemblée Parlementaire
    Parliamentary Assembly Assemblée parlementaire http://assembly.coe.int Doc. 13217 30 May 2013 Observation of the presidential election in Montenegro (7 April 2013) Election observation report Ad hoc Committee of the Bureau Rapporteur: Mr Christopher CHOPE, United Kingdom, European Democrat Group Contents Page 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Political and legal framework .................................................................................................................. 2 3. Election administration and registration of lists and candidates .............................................................2 4. The election campaign and the media environment ............................................................................... 4 5. Polling day .............................................................................................................................................. 6 6. Conclusions and recommendations........................................................................................................ 6 Appendix 1 – Composition of the ad hoc committee.................................................................................... 8 Appendix 2 – Programme of the election observation mission .................................................................... 9 Appendix 3 – Declaration of the presidential election observation mission ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Politics in Montenegro June 2012
    ATTITUDES TOWARD WOMEN IN POLITICS IN MONTENEGRO JUNE 2012 139 Government of Montenegro Ministry of Justice Women in politics Montenegro, June 2012 1 ATTITUDES TOWARD WOMEN IN POLITICS IN MONTENEGRO JUNE 2012 2 ATTITUDES TOWARD WOMEN IN POLITICS IN MONTENEGRO JUNE 2012 Table of contents 1. Research methodology .................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Desk......................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Face-to-face (F-2-F) survey ....................................................................................................... 7 1.3 In-depth interviews .................................................................................................................. 8 1.4 Response meters ................................................................................................................... 10 2. Legal and strategic frame ............................................................................................................. 11 2.1 International standards and initiatives ................................................................................... 11 2.2 National normative and institutional frame............................................................................ 17 2.2.1. Normative and strategic frame ....................................................................................... 17 2.2.2. Institutional framework and incentive
    [Show full text]
  • H.E. Filip Vujanovic, President of Montenegro
    Vienna, 3 November 2014 President of Montenegro, H.E. Mr. Filip Vujanović Dear UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, Dear representatives of the UN member states, Dear hosts, representatives of the Austrian Government, Ladies and Gentlemen, I am honoured to address you on behalf of Montenegro and confirm that Montenegro joins the efforts of the United Nations and Secretary-General in solving special needs of the developing and least developed countries. Economic growth of these countries has significantly been limited due to their distance from the world market. As a transit and geographically small country, Montenegro sends a clear message from this Conference. I mean mobilization of additional international support for the landlocked developing countries as well as renewal of partnership with international financial and development institutions for these countries. This is crucial for full implementation of the basic document for the work of this Conference - Almaty Programme of Action. After ten years, we can be sure that development of infrastructure and connection, integration of transport systems, especially railway system, together with fostering legal basis for cooperation with transit countries, are prerequisites for economic progress of the landlocked developing countries. The role of the United Nations in this context is important, especially when it comes to better coordination of technical and financial assistance, primarily financial institutions - UN affiliations- World Bank, IFC and major donors, as well as ensuring concessional credits. Moreover, we have been aware that, over the last decade, further mechanisms of support for so-called "closed" countries have been developed internationally, such as trade facilitation, aid for trade, aid for development, while the development of regional trade cooperation has certainly contributed to the improvement of economic situation in most of the 32 landlocked developing countries.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Fast Track to Reform
    INTERVIEW WITH THE PRESIDENT OF MONTENEGRO On the fast track to reform Seizing the momentum in Montenegro From the perspective of a country with strong European roots now making every effort to get its democratic institutions up and running, the OSCE represents all the internationally prescribed standards and commitments that Montenegro — the world’s newest State — is striving to live up to, says President Filip Vujanovic. OSCE/RISTO BOZOVIC BY SUSANNA LÖÖF the referendum on Montenegro’s legal status as a State on 21 May and the declaration of ffice of the President, Podgorica — independence on 3 June, the Government Montenegro’s chances of moving rap- made known its wish to join the OSCE before Oidly towards accession to the European any other organization. Less than three weeks Union are “great” and “realistic”, President later, on 22 June, Montenegrin Ambassador Filip Vujanovic told the OSCE Magazine Vesko Garcevic took his seat in the Permanent in early October. By the end of this year, Council. Montenegro expects to sign the European On 1 September, a related momentous Union’s Stabilization and Association event took place in Finland. The Prime Agreement — the first legal step towards its Minister of Montenegro at the time, Milo accession. Djukanovic, signed the Helsinki Final Act in The country has world-renowned natural Finlandia Hall — where the Yugoslav leader, scenery that is attracting tourists and inves- Marshall Tito, had signed the landmark docu- tors, a sound economic development frame- ment 31 years earlier. work, and — with just 630,000 inhabitants — President Vujanovic said the fast accession a favourable demographic profile.
    [Show full text]
  • Uručene Nagrade Najuspješnijim Privrednicima ISSN 0350-5340 Godina LIII Broj 4 April 2017
    Obilježen Dan Privredne komore Crne Gore Uručene nagrade najuspješnijim privrednicima ISSN 0350-5340 Godina LIII Broj 4 April 2017. ISSN 0350-5340 Godina LIII Broj Nada Medenica Veselin Mijajlović Ratko Nikolić CETI RCUD Bijela Business Inteligence Consulting Do vrhunskih Ekonomska, Podrška rezultata kvalitetom i bezbjednosna i poslovnom inovacijama humana misija odlučivanju IMPRESUM Broj 4 April 2017. Sadržaj Izdavač: Privredna komora Crne Gore Novaka Miloševa 29/II Podgorica 81000, Crna Gora Tel: +382 20 230 545 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.privrednakomora.me Redakcijski odbor: Predsjednica: Ljiljana Filipović Članovi: Pavle D. Radovanović, Novica Bulatović, Tanja Radusinović, dr Mladen Perazić, mr Nina Drakić, Aleksandar Marđonović Urednica: Milka Pižurica Obilježen Dan Privredne komore Crne Gore Novinar: 6 Igor Perović Uručene nagrade najuspješnijim privrednicima Prevod: Dragana Domazetović Adresa Redakcije: Privredna komora Crne Gore/Glasnik The Chamber’s Day Novaka Miloševa 29/II 10 The most successful business entities awarded Podgorica 81000, Crna Gora Single Market Forum Tel: +382 20 230 439 21 Transparency aimed at balancing development of joint economy e-mail: [email protected] Nada Medenica, executive director of CETI Dizajn: 37 Quality and innovation lead to excellent results Privredna komora Crne Gore Conference List izlazi od 1964. godine i upisan je u 51 Tourism aimed at development of food production registar javnih glasila Crne Gore. Veselin Mijajlovic PDF verziju možete preuzeti na: 58 Economic, security and humanitarian
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia and Montenegro Union: Prospects and Policy Implications
    Order Code RS21568 Updated December 29, 2005 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Serbia and Montenegro Union: Prospects and Policy Implications Julie Kim Specialist in International Relations Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Summary Serbia and Montenegro are united in a highly decentralized joint state under an agreement brokered by the European Union (EU) in 2002 and 2003. Authorities in Montenegro are planning to hold a long-awaited referendum on independence in April 2006, as provided for in the union agreement. A sizeable minority of the population and the political opposition in Montenegro oppose independence. Most of Serbia’s political leaders support continuation of the union but say they will recognize any result that is accepted by the EU. Uncertainty about the state’s future comes at the same time as the EU is negotiating an association agreement with Serbia and Montenegro and as the international community is conducting talks on the future status of Kosovo, a disputed province in Serbia. This report may be updated as events warrant. For additional information, see CRS Report RL30371, Serbia and Montenegro: Current Situation and U.S. Policy, by Steven Woehrel . Introduction On February 4, 2003, a new common state of Serbia and Montenegro came into being, replacing the bi-republic Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY). The event quietly marked the culmination of intensive European Union-led efforts to negotiate the continuation of a common state, as well as the start of a process to implement and develop the blueprint for the new, highly decentralized state. The agreement to keep Serbia and Montenegro a single international entity was initially viewed as a foreign policy success for Javier Solana, the EU’s common foreign policy representative.
    [Show full text]
  • POLITICAL PARTY BUILDING and CIVIC DEVELOPMENT USAID Cooperative Agreement No: EE-A-00-98-00028-00 October 1 to December 31, 2001
    Quarterly Report MONTENEGRO: POLITICAL PARTY BUILDING AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT USAID Cooperative Agreement No: EE-A-00-98-00028-00 October 1 to December 31, 2001 I. SUMMARY Uncertainty over the question of Montenegrin independence has continued with no end in sight to the political crisis. An October meeting among Serb, Montenegrin and Federal representatives did not resolve the federation's future. Although the U.S. and the European Union (EU) have pressured Montenegrin authorities to resume dialogue with Serbia and abandon independence plans, the Montenegrin government announced that the issue would be decided in a referendum held in early 2002. However, at the insistence of EU High Representative Javier Solana, the negotiations on the future of the federation resumed in mid-December. Meanwhile, a draft referendum law, heavily criticized by the OSCE since it provides for passage by simple majority only, did not pass in parliament. The pro-Yugoslavia opposition continued to demand an investigation of cigarette smuggling operations that implicate President Milo Djukanovic. Whether independent or not, Montenegro’s transition to a modern European actor will depend on its ability to build a democratic system that allows for informed and open debate related to the political reform process. The National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI) is committed to supporting democratic reforms in Montenegro as it addresses the continued need for internal political liberalization. The long-term goal of NDI’s Montenegro program is to strengthen Montenegro’s emerging democratic political system through increased organizational capacity of and improved public outreach by political parties and through the initiation of direct participation in the political process by nongovernmental organizations as a means to promote civil society and broad-based citizen participation in political affairs.
    [Show full text]