PRESIDENT of MONTENEGRO Mr Filip Vujanović PRIMEMINISTER of MONTENEGRO Mr Milo Đukanović PRESIDENT of the PARLIAMENT of MONTENEGRO Mr Ranko Krivokapić

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

PRESIDENT OF MONTENEGRO Mr Filip Vujanović PRIMEMINISTER OF MONTENEGRO Mr Milo Đukanović PRESIDENT OF THE PARLIAMENT OF MONTENEGRO Mr Ranko Krivokapić Podgorica, 22 October 2009 Subject: PROTEST CONCERNING OVERSIGHT OF COMPETENT STATE BODIES TO ELECT THE OMBUDSMAN IN A TIMELY MANNER Honourable gentlemen, Bearing in mind that the 6 – years term of office of the Ombudsman, Mr Šefko Crnovršanin, expired on 20 October and that the Parliament failed to elect the new person at that position in a timely manner, we state out protest, since this oversight clearly shows the irresponsible approach of the competent state bodies towards the obligation of the state to provide protection of human rights and freedoms. Obviously, this omission was also caused by untimely alignment of the Law on Ombudsman with the Constitution, which was recently pointed by the Venice Commission, as well. Particularly, the Constitution stipulates that the Parliament elects the Ombudsman, upon the nomination by the President of Montenegro (Art 95), while Law prescribes that the competent body of the Parliament nominates the Ombudsman, after consultation with the representatives of the civic sector dealing with human rights and freedoms (Art 8). We demand that the responsibility for this oversight to be determined in order to prevent the possibility of similar situations in future. We also request the Parliament to promptly align the Law on Ombudsman with the Constitution, and finally elect the Ombudsman. We propose that the President of Montenegro shall bind himself by the Law to consult with the representatives of civic sector dealing with human rights and freedoms during the process of nominating proposals for the position of Ombudsman. Human Rights Action Centre for anti – disctimination EKVISTA Centre for Civic Education Centre for Monitoring (CEMI) Centre for Development of NGOs Youth initiative for human rights Institute Alternative Youth cultural centre Juventas Shelter .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Monografija EPCG Za Web Low
100 GODINA CRNOGORSKE ELEKTROPRIVREDE Autori Prof. dr Živko M. Andrijašević Prof. dr Zvezdan Folić Mr Dragutin Papović Izdavač Elektroprivreda Crne Gore AD Nikšić Za izdavača Srđan Kovačević Stručni konsultant Prof. dr Lazar Ljubiša Lektor i korektor Zuvdija Hodžić Prepress Vladimir Papić, Lutrex Podgorica Štampa Grafotisak Grude Tiraž 1000 CIP - Katalogizacija u publikaciji Centralna narodna biblioteka Crne Gore, Cetiwe 621.31(497.16)(091) АНДРИЈАШЕВИЋ, Живко М. [Sto] 100 godina crnogorske elektroprivrede / Živko M. Andrijašević, Zvezdan Folić, Dragutin Papović. - Nikšić : Elektroprivreda Crne Gore AD Nikšić, 2010 (Grude : Grafotisak) . - 256 str. : fotogr., faks; 32 cm Tiraž 1000. ISBN 978-9940-9295-0-3 1. Фолић, Звездан [аутор] 2. Паповић, Драгутин [аутор] а) Електропривреда - Црна Гора - Историја - COBISS.CG-ID 16237072 Živko M. Andrijašević Zvezdan Folić Dragutin Papović USE THIS LOGO VERSION ABOVE 4cm GODINA CRNOGORSKE ELEKTROPRIVREDE Nikšić 2010. PREDGOVOR Avgusta 1910. godine u Crnoj Gori je na najsvečaniji način, i u prisustvu velikog broja inostranih zvanica, obilježen jubilej knjaza Nikole – pedeset godina vladavine. Na dan jubileja, knjaz Nikola je proglašen za kralja, a Crna Gora za kraljevinu. U vrijeme ovog velikog jubileja, u Cetinju, crnogorskoj prijestolnici, puštena je u rad prva električna centrala za javne namjene. Grad je tada dobio električno osvjetljenje. Avgusta 2010. godine navršilo se sto godina od kada je na prostoru Crne Gore počela upotreba električne energije za javne svrhe (osvjetljenje naselja). Tim povodom, preduzeće “Elektroprivreda Crne Gore” odlučilo je da ovaj veliki jubilej – vijek elektrike u Crnoj Gori, obilježi nizom manifestacija, kao i da publikuje monografiju koja će prikazati istorijat ove privredne grane na prostoru Crne Gore tokom jednog vijeka.
[Show full text]
PREDSJEDNIK RH STJEPAN MESIĆ DODIJELIO ODLIČJE DR. MILOŠU MILOŠEVIĆU Ponos Svima
GLASILO HRVATA CRNE GORE Godina VI Broj 39-40 Lipanj-Srpanj 2008. Cijena 1 € ISSN 1800-5179 PREDSJEDNIK RH STJEPAN MESIĆ DODIJELIO ODLIČJE DR. MILOŠU MILOŠEVIĆU Ponos svima 1200 GODINA DOLASKA 880099.. moćiju Sv. Tripuna u Kotor 22000099.. DR. MILOŠ MILOŠEVIĆ Poštovani čitatelji Događaji su u lipnju i srpnju samo prestizali jedan drugog – dodjela odličja dr. Milošu Miloševiću; gostovanje Hrvat - skog narodnog kazališta Zagreb; Prvi regionalni susret urednika glasila manjinskih zajednica i njihovih medijskih partnera… Sve u Kotoru, na inicijativu i u organizaciji Hr - Plovidba morima vatskog građanskog društva Crne Gore. Nije bilo lako ; trebalo je danonoćno raditi na usaglašava - dokumenata nju svakog detalja. I kada je već izgledalo da su ovo ipak prekrupni „zalogaji“ za jednu NVO, u kojoj djeluju uglav - STR. 10 nom entuzijasti, počeli su se uključivati novi , mladi članovi PREDSJEDNIK SKUPŠTINE CRNE GORE društva. Svoju potporu nesebično su, i svojom nazočnošću i RANKO KRIVOKAPIĆ akcijama, dali prijatelji iz Dubrovnika, ministarstva kulture i medija dviju država , Općina Kotor, Veleposlanstvo i Kon - Uvijek spreman zulat RH. Gradonačelnica Kotora došla je da otvori Regionalni su - da pomognem sret urednika , iako pod terapijom i sa visokom temperatu - STR. 14 rom. Pomoćnik ministra Željko Rutović, diplomate Nebojša Kirigin i Radojko Nižić ostali su do kraja susreta i aktivno POVJERENSTVO RASPODIJELILO sudjelovali u diskusiji . Jedan od sudionika skupa prokomen - SREDSTVA MVPEI RH tirao je kako prvi puta vidi tako nešto kada je u pitanju vlast Boćari pregazili Držića i predstavnici diplomacije. Mediji, dopisnici svih dnevnih listova, radio i TV stanica, STR. 24 propratili su sve spomenute događaje, dali najave, priloge, intervjue. PRVI REGIONALNI SUSRET UREDNIKA Sada, kada je sve iza nas i još pristižu pozitivni odjeci, HGDCG je ponosno što je ( i ne prvi puta) odradilo vrije - Za jačanje uloge dan posao od značaja za međudržavne odnose i očuvanje manjinskih medija identiteta hrvatske zajednice u Crnoj Gori.
[Show full text]
Nation Building - Montenegro
Report Nation building - Montenegro For: Client name October 2011 CONTENTS How to read tables 5 Results 7 Background .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 What is your citizenship? ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Witch passports do you hold? If you have more than one please name all of them ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 10 Have you been born in Montenegro? .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 11 For how many years have you been living in this country? ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Second Quarterly Report on the State of Human Rights in Montenegro In
YIHR QUARTERLY REPORT ON THE STATE OF HUMAN RIGHTS 2011 I Previous information The second quarterly report of Youth Initiative for Human Rights (YIHR) includes information collected during the period from April 1, 2011 and June 1, 2011. In our work, we used techniques of researching on the terrain, press clipping, analysis, interviews, and SOS phone line. YIHR conducts monitoring of human rights in Montenegro for the fifth year in a row and until nowadays, our organization published five annual reports and more quarterly reports that are available on our web site www.yihr.me . The report includes areas we have identified through our previous work as concerning ones, and the accent is on the state of human rights in practice. More detailed legal analysis of standards of human rights is being prepared for the annual report. The Report has been prepared by YIHR team, with financial and expert support of Civil Rights Defenders. At the time of preparation of this Report, cooperation with CAZAS, UNICEF, UNHCR and Association of People with Paraplegia in Pljevlja, Bijelo Polje and Rožaje, has been achieved, just as in preparation of previous quarterly report. Census was conducted in April, 2011. Statistical Office of Montenegro announced that Montenegro had 625.266 citizens, which was only 5.000 more than in 2003. The Court for Human Rights in Strasbourg rendered fifth verdict against Montenegro. Currently, there are 700 cases at the procedure, which is very large number in comparison with the number of citizens. The Government and other public bodies continued good cooperation and communication with NGO sector.
[Show full text]
Montenegro: Vassal Or Sovereign?
Scholars Crossing Faculty Publications and Presentations Helms School of Government January 2009 Montenegro: Vassal or Sovereign? Octavian Sofansky Stephen R. Bowers Liberty University, [email protected] Marion T. Doss, Jr. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/gov_fac_pubs Part of the Other Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons Recommended Citation Sofansky, Octavian; Bowers, Stephen R.; and Doss, Jr., Marion T., "Montenegro: Vassal or Sovereign?" (2009). Faculty Publications and Presentations. 28. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/gov_fac_pubs/28 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Helms School of Government at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Montenegro: Vassal or Sovereign? 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................ ................................ ............... 3 INTRODUCTION ................................ ................................ ......................... 4 STRATEGIC SIGNIFICANCE OF MONTENEGRO................................ .............. 6 INTERNAL POLITICAL DUALISM ................................ ................................ 12 RUSSIAN POLICY TOWARDS THE BALKANS................................ ............... 21 MULTILATERAL IMPLICATIONS
[Show full text]
Parliamentary Assembly Assemblée Parlementaire
Parliamentary Assembly Assemblée parlementaire http://assembly.coe.int Doc. 13217 30 May 2013 Observation of the presidential election in Montenegro (7 April 2013) Election observation report Ad hoc Committee of the Bureau Rapporteur: Mr Christopher CHOPE, United Kingdom, European Democrat Group Contents Page 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Political and legal framework .................................................................................................................. 2 3. Election administration and registration of lists and candidates .............................................................2 4. The election campaign and the media environment ............................................................................... 4 5. Polling day .............................................................................................................................................. 6 6. Conclusions and recommendations........................................................................................................ 6 Appendix 1 – Composition of the ad hoc committee.................................................................................... 8 Appendix 2 – Programme of the election observation mission .................................................................... 9 Appendix 3 – Declaration of the presidential election observation mission ..............................................
[Show full text]
Women in Politics in Montenegro June 2012
ATTITUDES TOWARD WOMEN IN POLITICS IN MONTENEGRO JUNE 2012 139 Government of Montenegro Ministry of Justice Women in politics Montenegro, June 2012 1 ATTITUDES TOWARD WOMEN IN POLITICS IN MONTENEGRO JUNE 2012 2 ATTITUDES TOWARD WOMEN IN POLITICS IN MONTENEGRO JUNE 2012 Table of contents 1. Research methodology .................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Desk......................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Face-to-face (F-2-F) survey ....................................................................................................... 7 1.3 In-depth interviews .................................................................................................................. 8 1.4 Response meters ................................................................................................................... 10 2. Legal and strategic frame ............................................................................................................. 11 2.1 International standards and initiatives ................................................................................... 11 2.2 National normative and institutional frame............................................................................ 17 2.2.1. Normative and strategic frame ....................................................................................... 17 2.2.2. Institutional framework and incentive
[Show full text]
H.E. Filip Vujanovic, President of Montenegro
Vienna, 3 November 2014 President of Montenegro, H.E. Mr. Filip Vujanović Dear UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, Dear representatives of the UN member states, Dear hosts, representatives of the Austrian Government, Ladies and Gentlemen, I am honoured to address you on behalf of Montenegro and confirm that Montenegro joins the efforts of the United Nations and Secretary-General in solving special needs of the developing and least developed countries. Economic growth of these countries has significantly been limited due to their distance from the world market. As a transit and geographically small country, Montenegro sends a clear message from this Conference. I mean mobilization of additional international support for the landlocked developing countries as well as renewal of partnership with international financial and development institutions for these countries. This is crucial for full implementation of the basic document for the work of this Conference - Almaty Programme of Action. After ten years, we can be sure that development of infrastructure and connection, integration of transport systems, especially railway system, together with fostering legal basis for cooperation with transit countries, are prerequisites for economic progress of the landlocked developing countries. The role of the United Nations in this context is important, especially when it comes to better coordination of technical and financial assistance, primarily financial institutions - UN affiliations- World Bank, IFC and major donors, as well as ensuring concessional credits. Moreover, we have been aware that, over the last decade, further mechanisms of support for so-called "closed" countries have been developed internationally, such as trade facilitation, aid for trade, aid for development, while the development of regional trade cooperation has certainly contributed to the improvement of economic situation in most of the 32 landlocked developing countries.
[Show full text]
On the Fast Track to Reform
INTERVIEW WITH THE PRESIDENT OF MONTENEGRO On the fast track to reform Seizing the momentum in Montenegro From the perspective of a country with strong European roots now making every effort to get its democratic institutions up and running, the OSCE represents all the internationally prescribed standards and commitments that Montenegro — the world’s newest State — is striving to live up to, says President Filip Vujanovic. OSCE/RISTO BOZOVIC BY SUSANNA LÖÖF the referendum on Montenegro’s legal status as a State on 21 May and the declaration of ffice of the President, Podgorica — independence on 3 June, the Government Montenegro’s chances of moving rap- made known its wish to join the OSCE before Oidly towards accession to the European any other organization. Less than three weeks Union are “great” and “realistic”, President later, on 22 June, Montenegrin Ambassador Filip Vujanovic told the OSCE Magazine Vesko Garcevic took his seat in the Permanent in early October. By the end of this year, Council. Montenegro expects to sign the European On 1 September, a related momentous Union’s Stabilization and Association event took place in Finland. The Prime Agreement — the first legal step towards its Minister of Montenegro at the time, Milo accession. Djukanovic, signed the Helsinki Final Act in The country has world-renowned natural Finlandia Hall — where the Yugoslav leader, scenery that is attracting tourists and inves- Marshall Tito, had signed the landmark docu- tors, a sound economic development frame- ment 31 years earlier. work, and — with just 630,000 inhabitants — President Vujanovic said the fast accession a favourable demographic profile.
[Show full text]
Uručene Nagrade Najuspješnijim Privrednicima ISSN 0350-5340 Godina LIII Broj 4 April 2017
Obilježen Dan Privredne komore Crne Gore Uručene nagrade najuspješnijim privrednicima ISSN 0350-5340 Godina LIII Broj 4 April 2017. ISSN 0350-5340 Godina LIII Broj Nada Medenica Veselin Mijajlović Ratko Nikolić CETI RCUD Bijela Business Inteligence Consulting Do vrhunskih Ekonomska, Podrška rezultata kvalitetom i bezbjednosna i poslovnom inovacijama humana misija odlučivanju IMPRESUM Broj 4 April 2017. Sadržaj Izdavač: Privredna komora Crne Gore Novaka Miloševa 29/II Podgorica 81000, Crna Gora Tel: +382 20 230 545 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.privrednakomora.me Redakcijski odbor: Predsjednica: Ljiljana Filipović Članovi: Pavle D. Radovanović, Novica Bulatović, Tanja Radusinović, dr Mladen Perazić, mr Nina Drakić, Aleksandar Marđonović Urednica: Milka Pižurica Obilježen Dan Privredne komore Crne Gore Novinar: 6 Igor Perović Uručene nagrade najuspješnijim privrednicima Prevod: Dragana Domazetović Adresa Redakcije: Privredna komora Crne Gore/Glasnik The Chamber’s Day Novaka Miloševa 29/II 10 The most successful business entities awarded Podgorica 81000, Crna Gora Single Market Forum Tel: +382 20 230 439 21 Transparency aimed at balancing development of joint economy e-mail: [email protected] Nada Medenica, executive director of CETI Dizajn: 37 Quality and innovation lead to excellent results Privredna komora Crne Gore Conference List izlazi od 1964. godine i upisan je u 51 Tourism aimed at development of food production registar javnih glasila Crne Gore. Veselin Mijajlovic PDF verziju možete preuzeti na: 58 Economic, security and humanitarian
[Show full text]
Serbia and Montenegro Union: Prospects and Policy Implications
Order Code RS21568 Updated December 29, 2005 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Serbia and Montenegro Union: Prospects and Policy Implications Julie Kim Specialist in International Relations Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Summary Serbia and Montenegro are united in a highly decentralized joint state under an agreement brokered by the European Union (EU) in 2002 and 2003. Authorities in Montenegro are planning to hold a long-awaited referendum on independence in April 2006, as provided for in the union agreement. A sizeable minority of the population and the political opposition in Montenegro oppose independence. Most of Serbia’s political leaders support continuation of the union but say they will recognize any result that is accepted by the EU. Uncertainty about the state’s future comes at the same time as the EU is negotiating an association agreement with Serbia and Montenegro and as the international community is conducting talks on the future status of Kosovo, a disputed province in Serbia. This report may be updated as events warrant. For additional information, see CRS Report RL30371, Serbia and Montenegro: Current Situation and U.S. Policy, by Steven Woehrel . Introduction On February 4, 2003, a new common state of Serbia and Montenegro came into being, replacing the bi-republic Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY). The event quietly marked the culmination of intensive European Union-led efforts to negotiate the continuation of a common state, as well as the start of a process to implement and develop the blueprint for the new, highly decentralized state. The agreement to keep Serbia and Montenegro a single international entity was initially viewed as a foreign policy success for Javier Solana, the EU’s common foreign policy representative.
[Show full text]
POLITICAL PARTY BUILDING and CIVIC DEVELOPMENT USAID Cooperative Agreement No: EE-A-00-98-00028-00 October 1 to December 31, 2001
Quarterly Report MONTENEGRO: POLITICAL PARTY BUILDING AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT USAID Cooperative Agreement No: EE-A-00-98-00028-00 October 1 to December 31, 2001 I. SUMMARY Uncertainty over the question of Montenegrin independence has continued with no end in sight to the political crisis. An October meeting among Serb, Montenegrin and Federal representatives did not resolve the federation's future. Although the U.S. and the European Union (EU) have pressured Montenegrin authorities to resume dialogue with Serbia and abandon independence plans, the Montenegrin government announced that the issue would be decided in a referendum held in early 2002. However, at the insistence of EU High Representative Javier Solana, the negotiations on the future of the federation resumed in mid-December. Meanwhile, a draft referendum law, heavily criticized by the OSCE since it provides for passage by simple majority only, did not pass in parliament. The pro-Yugoslavia opposition continued to demand an investigation of cigarette smuggling operations that implicate President Milo Djukanovic. Whether independent or not, Montenegro’s transition to a modern European actor will depend on its ability to build a democratic system that allows for informed and open debate related to the political reform process. The National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI) is committed to supporting democratic reforms in Montenegro as it addresses the continued need for internal political liberalization. The long-term goal of NDI’s Montenegro program is to strengthen Montenegro’s emerging democratic political system through increased organizational capacity of and improved public outreach by political parties and through the initiation of direct participation in the political process by nongovernmental organizations as a means to promote civil society and broad-based citizen participation in political affairs.
[Show full text]