Denton Layout

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Denton Layout WHAT MAKES NICK TICK? The smartest publisher in the blogosphere says there’s no money online. So why doesn’t anyone believe him? BY GREG LINDSAY ICK DENTON WON’T TALK TO ME. friends jealous. I’ve been after him for weeks. But the But now, clearly, I am unloved. man behind the wittiest, bitchiest, So I’m a bit surprised the morning I receive Nmost irresistible weblogs going—the this e-mail: gossipy Gawker and Wonkette, the gadget pag- eant Gizmodo, and the smut aggregator Flesh- From: Nick Denton bot—is shutting me out, claiming he’s over- To: Greg Lindsay Subject: exposed. He’s so serious about not commenting Calacanis Date: Tue,13 Apr 2004 11:16:27 -0400 that he’s ordered his stable of blog writers not to talk to me either. Hey, Greg—not sure whether you’re still doing your business-of-blogging story. To drive home the point, Gawker gives me But here’s a possible peg. the silent treatment. I—and my media stories [Jason] Calacanis has commitments for for Women’s Wear Daily—had been a running $4M from Mark Cuban and an Israeli in- joke on the site, which once sized me up as a vestor, possibly Yossi Vardi. You former “parboiled-ham-in-a-suit” and relent- didn’t hear it from me. lessly questioned my sexual preferences. Like I told you, Calacanis is a much (“Greg Lindsay Comes Out” was a headline better business story than I am. last fall.) Gawker is so beloved in New York’s Nick media circles that this actually made my 128 BUSINESS 2.0 JUNE 2004 PHOTOGRAPH BY MICHAEL EDWARDS HIGH TURNOVER Bloggers Meg Hourihan, left, and Pete Rojas no Back of the Envelope: Gawker Media longer work for Denton. Monthly Monthly Site Launched Current editor Who’s it for? visitors revenue (est.) GIZMODO August 2002 Joel Johnson Gadget freaks 537,000 $6,000 GAWKER December 2002 Choire Sicha New York chatterati 456,000 $6,000 FLESHBOT November 2003 John D’Addario Pornoisseurs 519,000 $5,000 WONKETTE January 2004 Ana Marie Cox Beltway buffs 250,000 $3,000 DEFAMER May 2004 anonymous Hollywood habitués N/A N/A Could Denton be capitulating? Maybe his Calacanis gambit was skimming off the demographic cream—the influential chatterati. a bid to pique my interest. Jason Calacanis, as you may know, was How does he turn that cream into milk money? The revenues at his biggish during the bubble years as, among other things, the pub- flagships, Gawker and Gizmodo, have nearly tripled since last fall, to lisher of the now-defunct Silicon Alley Reporter in New York City. about $6,000 a month each. Both are in the black, several Denton as- He’s the closest thing Denton has to a competitor these days. But sociates claim. Based on current rates and inventory, a quick calcu- as a blog impresario, he’s not a business story. lation suggests Denton is grossing about $250,000 a year. Denton, on the other hand, may be quietly figuring out the Given the rate of growth, he could be taking in $1 million an- most vexing problem of new media—how to make it pay. That’s nually by next year—and that’s assuming he doesn’t add more sites. the more provocative scenario, anyway. Less interesting is the pos- Naturally, he does plan to add more sites: Defamer, an L.A. version sibility that he’s simply manipulating me to write about him. He’s of Gawker, was to open by this magazine’s press time, and Den- an expert at getting the right kind of buzz, after all, which helps ton is said to be considering launching a travel blog. inflate his properties’ value. And that could be the real endgame: “My guess is that Nick has been downplaying the size of the finding someone to unload his business on at the right time. Sound opportunity of blogging,” says Fred Wilson, a venture capitalist and too cynical? One of Denton’s first companies threw networking blogger himself, “because he’s not excited about the prospect of parties for dotcom naifs. And that one sold for millions at the top lots of capital coming in and creating competition for him.” of the bubble. It sounds ambitious for a man who’s consistently talked down Any way you look at it, you have to conclude that Denton is his own financial ambitions. So what really makes Nick tick? wily. Consider his blog business model. A decade ago, media com- panies sank untold millions of dollars into building and staffing ENTON CAME FROM NOWHERE, ALTHOUGH HE websites. Most of them are still in the red. It turned out that most wasn’t a nobody. Half-English and half-Hungarian, he Net users don’t want to pay for content, so new-media publishers Dwas Oxford-educated and lucky to be in Budapest when the had to rely on the trickle of revenue that came from online ads. Berlin Wall fell. He covered the end of communist Romania for a Denton learned from that debacle and embraced weblogs, which London newspaper and parlayed that into a gig at the Financial are the LEDs of the media firmament: They require almost no Times through the ’90s, eventually covering Silicon Valley. Then he resources to run. His mini media empire, Gawker Media, has no caught the bug, having perversely decided that journalists were ex- offices, no proprietary technology, and no full-time employees, pendable. He launched a company called Moreover, whose goal yet it can attract audiences big enough to generate ad revenue. was to aggregate all the world’s news on one site, disintermediating Better still, the “content” is virtually free, since it consists of little most of his former profession. (This is a theme; when I first met more than snarky comments pointing to other sites (mostly news- Denton before working on this piece, he promised that Gawker papers and magazines) that really do spend money or time creat- would commoditize my then-job of media reporter.) ing content. It’s so dumb, it works: Denton’s blog model is lean- Back in London, he began hosting dotcommer parties that grew er than a George Foreman turkey burger. And it’s already returning so big, he and his three partners decided there must be a revenue a modest profit—with the potential to deliver substantially more stream in them somewhere. After throwing half a dozen events, within a few years. Denton bounced between London, San Francisco, and New York, Of course, if it were that simple, everyone would be doing it. raising money for Moreover. His partners carried on with what be- Denton has figured out a couple of tricks. By offering fame rather came First Tuesday—a face-to-face network that connected entre- than fortune, he’s persuaded talented writers to work for him for less preneurs with investors over drinks—which they sold at the peak money than they’d make pulling cappuccinos at Starbucks. And he of the bubble, in July 2000, to the Israeli firm Yazam. Though no one picks subjects for his blogs that are irresistible to the chattering involved will say how much, if anything, Denton himself made from classes—media, power, sex, and toys. In the end, it costs Denton a the deal, the four partners and their investors got a reported $50 few thousand bucks per month for each site, in return for a month- million in cash and stock in the combined company. Six months ly audience of about 1.6 million young, media-savvy readers. Sev- later, Yazam sold First Tuesday for a pittance and shortly thereafter eral Internet user studies recently concluded that the total blog- sold itself to a prison-labor operator. It was a valuable lesson. ger audience is only 13 million to 14 million readers. Denton is “Nick understands the difference between valuation and value,” TIMES K. YEE/THE NEW YORK MARILYNN 130 BUSINESS 2.0 JUNE 2004 says one of First Tuesday’s co- gave Spiers a weeklong audition founders, former Wired UK ed- for a staff job in September, itor John Browning. “He’s per- Denton replaced her. fectly able to say, ‘This is He quickly launched two undervalued and worth invest- more blogs. First was Fleshbot, ment,’ and he’s equally willing making Denton a pornograph- to say that the market is valu- er-by-proxy with its hard-core ing this business at more than links. Having timed Fleshbot’s its underlying worth.” Denton’s debut for the day the Paris modus operandi is to buy the Hilton tape went wide on the former and sell the latter. Web, Denton earned another While negotiating First Tues- plug in the New York Times. day’s sale, he was simultane- Wonkette followed in Janu- ously trying to raise a decisive “WE DON’T HAVE ary, filling a niche that was gen- round for Moreover. He suc- uinely underserved: scorched- ceeded, finding $21 million, but TO KOWTOW. WE earth gossip from inside the stepped down as CEO in Au- Beltway. Its editor, old new-me- gust 2001 in favor of someone DON’T HAVE TO dia hand Ana Marie Cox (once with more salesmanship. He SUCK UP.” the editor of the now-closed then left for London to care for Suck.com), predictably roiled his ailing mother. Moreover still NEW NEW MEDIA? Denton says he’s in it for freedom, not money. the locals, leading to the obliga- slogs toward profitability today, tory Times piece.
Recommended publications
  • Michelle S. Simon, Hogan Vs. Gawker II
    7 SIMON (DO NOT DELETE) 3/29/2018 9:45 AM HOGAN VS. GAWKER II: A STATUTORY SOLUTION TO FRAUDULENT JOINDER Michelle S. Simon* Introduction ..........................................................................................2 I. The Intersection of Federal Jurisdiction and Litigation Strategy ......................................................................................6 A. Diversity Jurisdiction ............................................................6 B. Removal ................................................................................8 C. Litigation Strategy .................................................................9 II. The Fraudulent Joinder Standard .............................................12 A. The Supreme Court .............................................................12 B. The Lower Courts................................................................14 1. The Standard .................................................................14 2. Application of the Standard...........................................20 III. Time for a Statute.....................................................................23 A. Why a Statute and not Case Law ........................................23 B. The Proposed Statute ...........................................................25 C. Analysis of the Proposed Statute .........................................28 Conclusion .........................................................................................41 *Michelle S. Simon is a Professor of Law and the
    [Show full text]
  • •Œdonald the Dove, Hillary the Hawkâ•Š:Gender in the 2016 Presidential Election
    Historical Perspectives: Santa Clara University Undergraduate Journal of History, Series II Volume 23 Article 16 2019 “Donald the Dove, Hillary the Hawk”:Gender in the 2016 Presidential Election Brandon Sanchez Santa Clara University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/historical-perspectives Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Sanchez, Brandon (2019) "“Donald the Dove, Hillary the Hawk”:Gender in the 2016 Presidential Election," Historical Perspectives: Santa Clara University Undergraduate Journal of History, Series II: Vol. 23 , Article 16. Available at: https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/historical-perspectives/vol23/iss1/16 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Historical Perspectives: Santa Clara University Undergraduate Journal of History, Series II by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sanchez: “Donald the Dove, Hillary the Hawk”:Gender in the 2016 Presidenti “Donald the Dove, Hillary the Hawk”: Gender in the 2016 Presidential Election Brandon Sanchez “Nobody has more respect for women than I do,” assured Donald Trump, then the Republican nominee for president, during his third and final debate with the Democratic nominee, former secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton, in late October 2016. “Nobody.” Over the scoffs and howls issued by the audience, moderator Chris Wallace tried to keep order—“Please, everybody!”1 In the weeks after the October 7th release of the “Access Hollywood” tape, on which Trump discussed grabbing women’s genitals against their will, a slew of harassment accusations had shaken the Trump campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Alex Pareene: Pundit of the Century
    Alex Pareene: Pundit of the Century Alex Pareene, first of Wonkette, then Gawker, then Salon, then back to Gawker, then a stillborn First Run Media project, and now Splinter News is a great pundit. In fact, he is a brilliant pundit and criminally underrated. His talent is generally overlooked because he has by-and-large written for outlets derided by both the right and the center. Conservatives have treated Salon as a punching bag for years now, and Gawker—no matter how biting or insightful it got—was never treated as serious by the mainstream because of their willingness to sneer, and even cuss at, the powers that be. If instead Mr. Pareene had been blogging at Mother Jones or Slate for the last ten years, he would be delivering college commencement speeches by now. In an attempt to make the world better appreciate this elucidating polemicist, here are some of his best hits. Mr. Pareene first got noticed, rightfully, for his “Hack List” feature when he was still with Salon. Therein, he took mainstream pundits both “left” and right to task for, well, being idiots. What is impressive about the list is that although it was written years ago, when America’s political landscape was dramatically different from what it is today, it still holds up. In 2012, after noting that while The New York Times has good reporting and that not all of their opinion columns were bad… most of them were. Putting it succinctly: “Ross Douthat is essentially a parody of the sort of conservative Times readers would find palatable, now that David Brooks is a sad shell of his former self, listlessly summarizing random bits of social science and pretending the Republican Party is secretly moderate and reasonable.” Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Univision Communications Inc to Acquire Digital Media Assets from Gawker Media for $135 Million
    UNIVISION COMMUNICATIONS INC TO ACQUIRE DIGITAL MEDIA ASSETS FROM GAWKER MEDIA FOR $135 MILLION Acquisition of Digital Assets will Reinforce UCI’s Digital Strategy and is Expected to Increase Fusion Media Group’s Digital Reach to Nearly 75 Million Uniques, Building on Recent Investments in FUSION, The Root and The Onion NEW YORK – AUGUST 18, 2016 – Univision Communications Inc. (UCI) today announced it has entered into an agreement to acquire digital media assets as part of the bankruptcy proceedings of Gawker Media Group, Inc. and related companies that produce content under a series of original brands that reach nearly 50 million readers per month, according to comScore. UCI will acquire the digital media assets for $135 million, subject to certain adjustments, and these assets will be integrated into Fusion Media Group (FMG), the division of UCI that serves the young, diverse audiences that make up the rising American mainstream. The deal, which will be accounted for as an asset purchase, includes the following digital platforms, Gizmodo, Jalopnik, Jezebel, Deadspin, Lifehacker and Kotaku. UCI will not be operating the Gawker.com site. With this strategic acquisition, FMG’s digital reach is expected rise to nearly 75 million uniques, or 96 million uniques when including its extended network. The acquisition will further enrich FMG’s content offerings across key verticals including iconic platforms focused on technology (Gizmodo), car culture (Jalopnik), contemporary women’s interests (Jezebel) and sports (Deadspin), among others. The deal builds on UCI’s recently announced creation of FMG and investments in FUSION, The Root and The Onion, which includes The A.V.
    [Show full text]
  • North Dakota Homeland Security Anti-Terrorism Summary
    UNCLASSIFIED North Dakota Homeland Security Anti-Terrorism Summary The North Dakota Open Source Anti-Terrorism Summary is a product of the North Dakota State and Local Intelligence Center (NDSLIC). It provides open source news articles and information on terrorism, crime, and potential destructive or damaging acts of nature or unintentional acts. Articles are placed in the Anti-Terrorism Summary to provide situational awareness for local law enforcement, first responders, government officials, and private/public infrastructure owners. UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED NDSLIC Disclaimer The Anti-Terrorism Summary is a non-commercial publication intended to educate and inform. Further reproduction or redistribution is subject to original copyright restrictions. NDSLIC provides no warranty of ownership of the copyright, or accuracy with respect to the original source material. Quick links North Dakota Energy Regional Food and Agriculture National Government Sector (including Schools and Universities) International Information Technology and Banking and Finance Industry Telecommunications Chemical and Hazardous Materials National Monuments and Icons Sector Postal and Shipping Commercial Facilities Public Health Communications Sector Transportation Critical Manufacturing Water and Dams Defense Industrial Base Sector North Dakota Homeland Security Emergency Services Contacts UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED North Dakota Nothing Significant to Report Regional (Minnesota) Hacker charged over siphoning off funds meant for software devs. An alleged hacker has been charged with breaking into the e-commerce systems of Digital River before redirecting more than $250,000 to an account under his control. The hacker, of Houston, Texas, 35, is charged with fraudulently obtaining more than $274K between December 2008 and October 2009 following an alleged hack against the network of SWReg Inc, a Digital River subsidiary.
    [Show full text]
  • Blog Title Blog URL Blog Owner Blog Category Technorati Rank
    Technorati Bloglines BlogPulse Wikio SEOmoz’s Blog Title Blog URL Blog Owner Blog Category Rank Rank Rank Rank Trifecta Blog Score Engadget http://www.engadget.com Time Warner Inc. Technology/Gadgets 4 3 6 2 78 19.23 Boing Boing http://www.boingboing.net Happy Mutants LLC Technology/Marketing 5 6 15 4 89 33.71 TechCrunch http://www.techcrunch.com TechCrunch Inc. Technology/News 2 27 2 1 76 42.11 Lifehacker http://lifehacker.com Gawker Media Technology/Gadgets 6 21 9 7 78 55.13 Official Google Blog http://googleblog.blogspot.com Google Inc. Technology/Corporate 14 10 3 38 94 69.15 Gizmodo http://www.gizmodo.com/ Gawker Media Technology/News 3 79 4 3 65 136.92 ReadWriteWeb http://www.readwriteweb.com RWW Network Technology/Marketing 9 56 21 5 64 142.19 Mashable http://mashable.com Mashable Inc. Technology/Marketing 10 65 36 6 73 160.27 Daily Kos http://dailykos.com/ Kos Media, LLC Politics 12 59 8 24 63 163.49 NYTimes: The Caucus http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com The New York Times Company Politics 27 >100 31 8 93 179.57 Kotaku http://kotaku.com Gawker Media Technology/Video Games 19 >100 19 28 77 216.88 Smashing Magazine http://www.smashingmagazine.com Smashing Magazine Technology/Web Production 11 >100 40 18 60 283.33 Seth Godin's Blog http://sethgodin.typepad.com Seth Godin Technology/Marketing 15 68 >100 29 75 284 Gawker http://www.gawker.com/ Gawker Media Entertainment News 16 >100 >100 15 81 287.65 Crooks and Liars http://www.crooksandliars.com John Amato Politics 49 >100 33 22 67 305.97 TMZ http://www.tmz.com Time Warner Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Media and the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Faris, Robert M., Hal Roberts, Bruce Etling, Nikki Bourassa, Ethan Zuckerman, and Yochai Benkler. 2017. Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Paper. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33759251 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA AUGUST 2017 PARTISANSHIP, Robert Faris Hal Roberts PROPAGANDA, & Bruce Etling Nikki Bourassa DISINFORMATION Ethan Zuckerman Yochai Benkler Online Media & the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper is the result of months of effort and has only come to be as a result of the generous input of many people from the Berkman Klein Center and beyond. Jonas Kaiser and Paola Villarreal expanded our thinking around methods and interpretation. Brendan Roach provided excellent research assistance. Rebekah Heacock Jones helped get this research off the ground, and Justin Clark helped bring it home. We are grateful to Gretchen Weber, David Talbot, and Daniel Dennis Jones for their assistance in the production and publication of this study. This paper has also benefited from contributions of many outside the Berkman Klein community. The entire Media Cloud team at the Center for Civic Media at MIT’s Media Lab has been essential to this research.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS 6 Economic 10 Studies Global Economy and Development 27 Katrina’S Lessons in Recovery
    QUALITY IMPACT AND INDEPENDENCE ANNUAL REPORT THE 2005 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 www.brookings.edu BROOKINGSINSTITUTION 2005 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS 6 Economic 10 Studies Global Economy and Development 27 Katrina’s Lessons in Recovery 39 Brookings Institution Press 14 40 Governance Center for Executive Education Studies 2 About Brookings 4 Chairman’s Message 5 President’s Message 31 Brookings Council 18 36 Honor Roll of Contributors Foreign 42 Financial Summary Policy Studies 44 Trustees 24 Metropolitan Policy Editor: Melissa Skolfield, Vice President for Communications Copyright ©2005 The Brookings Institution Writers: Katie Busch, Shawn Dhar, Anjetta McQueen, Ron Nessen 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, NW 28 Design and Print Production: The Magazine Group, Inc. Washington, DC 20036 Jeffrey Kibler, Virginia Reardon, Brenda Waugh Telephone: 202-797-6000 Support for Production Coordinator: Adrianna Pita Fax: 202-797-6004 Printing: Jarboe Printing www.brookings.edu Cover Photographs: (front cover) William Bradstreet/Folio, Inc., Library of Congress Card Number: 84-641502 Brookings (inside covers) Catherine Karnow/Folio, Inc. Broadcast reporters zoom in for a forum on a new compact for Iraq THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION featuring U.S. Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware. he Brookings Institution is a pri- vate nonprofit organization devoted to independent research and innovative policy solutions. Celebrating its 90th anniversary in 2006, Brookings analyzes current and emerging issues and produces new ideas that matter—for the nation and the world. ■ For policymakers and the media, Brookings scholars provide the highest-quality research, policy recommendations, and analysis on the full range of public policy issues. ■ Research at the Brookings Institution is conducted to inform the public debate, not advance a political agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Michelle Chiang
    EXPERIENCE JUN 2018–CURRENT Senior Product Designer Ticketmaster/Live Nation, Los Angeles CA Ideate and collaborate with design, product, and engineering teams for Ticketmaster’s B2B Enterprise product and software. Daily tasks include improving and building upon features that artist agents, promoters, box office managers, and internal support teams use to connect with, interact with, and to better serve fans with unforgettable experiences. NOV 2015–MAY 2018 Senior Product Designer Gizmodo Media Group/Fusion Media Group, New York NY Work closely with tech, product, and business on building tools and features for our publishing platform. Site brands include: Deadspin, Gizmodo, Jalopnik, Jezebel, Kotaku, Kinja Deals, Lifehacker, The Root, Splinter, The A.V. Club, ClickHole, and The Onion. Day-to-day tasks involve researching, ideating, testing, and creating a cohesive experience across all sites, for both editors and readers. JUL 2015–APR 2016 UI/UX/Product Designer Consultant for Various Start-ups Work with start-up clients in retail, e-commerce, and healthcare insurance industries. I lead the design direction while collaborating closely with lead engineers and CEOs to define brand identity, release iPhone app features, and launch web apps. OCT 2011–JUL 2015 Senior Product Designer LearnVest.com, New York NY MICHELLE CHIANG Concept and create web and mobile products/features, interaction design, michellechiang.com | [email protected] wireframes, user flows, A/B testing, and marketing campaigns. Work closely with the UX and engineering teams in an agile environment. Projects involve researching, brainstorming, sketching, prototyping, and user testing. MAY 2009–JUL 2011 Senior Designer and Supervisor VCU Recreational Sports, Richmond VA Develop various print and digital materials including: course promotions, Outdoor Adventure Program event listings, banners, posters, and shirt designs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet
    GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works Faculty Scholarship 2007 The Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet Daniel J. Solove George Washington University Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Solove, Daniel J., The Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet (October 24, 2007). The Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet, Yale University Press (2007); GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper 2017-4; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper 2017-4. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2899125 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/ abstract=2899125 The Future of Reputation Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/ abstract=2899125 This page intentionally left blank Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/ abstract=2899125 The Future of Reputation Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet Daniel J. Solove Yale University Press New Haven and London To Papa Nat A Caravan book. For more information, visit www.caravanbooks.org Copyright © 2007 by Daniel J. Solove. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Evaluation Report
    2018 Evaluation Report February 2019 Youth Engagement Fund - 2018 Evaluation Report 1 1 2018 Evaluation Report February 2019 PO Box 7748 Albuquerque, NM 87194 Youth Engagement Fund - 2018 Evaluation Report Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................1 Background ......................................................................................................................................................3 Objectives ............................................................................................................................................3 Methodology .......................................................................................................................................3 Approach ..........................................................................................................................................................4 Metrics ....................................................................................................................................................4 Findings .............................................................................................................................................................5 Voter Registration .............................................................................................................................5 Get Out The Vote (GOTV) ............................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter CLUSIT - 31 Dicembre 2010
    Newsletter CLUSIT - 31 dicembre 2010 Indice 1. RINNOVO DIRETTIVO CLUSIT 2. FORMAZIONE NELLE SCUOLE 3. AGGIORNAMENTO QUADERNO PCI-DSS 4. CALENDARIO SEMINARI CLUSIT 2011 5. NOTIZIE DAL BLOG 6. NOTIZIE E SEGNALAZIONI DAI SOCI 1. RINNOVO DIRETTIVO CLUSIT Nel corso dell'assemblea generale dello scorso 17 dicembre, si è proceduto all'elezione del nuovo Comitato Direttivo e del suo Presidente. Riportiamo di seguito l'elenco dei nuovi eletti, con i relativi ruoli e materie di competenza. • Gigi TAGLIAPIETRA - Presidente • Paolo GIUDICE - Segretario Generale • Giorgio GIUDICE - Tesoriere e Webmaster • Luca BECHELLI - Sicurezza e Compliance • Raoul CHIESA - Sicurezza delle Infrastrutture Critiche, CyberWar • Mauro CICOGNINI - Responsabile Seminari Clusit • Gabriele FAGGIOLI - Ufficio Legale • Mariangela FAGNANI - Aspetti etici e regolamenti interni • Massimiliano MANZETTI - Rapporti con il Mondo Sanitario • Marco MISITANO - Convergence tra sicurezza fisica e sicurezza logica • Mattia MONGA - Rapporti con i CERT ed il Mondo Universitario • Alessio PENNASILICO - Security Summit, Hacking Film Festival • Stefano QUINTARELLI - Rapporti con gli operatori Telcom e ISP • Claudio TELMON - Responsabile Iniziative "Rischio IT e PMI", "Premio Tesi", "Adotta una scuola", "video pillole di sicurezza" • Alessandro Vallega - Coordinamento Gruppi di Lavoro 2. FORMAZIONE NELLE SCUOLE Come discusso durante l'ultima assemblea, stiamo attivando l'iniziativa Adotta una scuola, che mira a sviluppare un'attività di sensibilizzazione alle problematiche della sicurezza ICT presso le scuole, da parte dei soci. www.clusit.it pag. 1 [email protected] Newsletter CLUSIT - 31 dicembre 2010 Una volta che l'iniziativa sarà a regime, i soci ci potranno comunicare scuole, presumibilmente della loro area, che sono disposti ad "adottare". A seguito di questa richiesta il Clusit contatterà il preside con una lettera in cui propone l'iniziativa e "accredita" il socio che quindi, se il preside sarà d'accordo, andrà a fare uno o più interventi di sensibilizzazione sul tema della sicurezza ICT presso quella scuola.
    [Show full text]