DOCSLIB.ORG

EAFONSI Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EAFONSI Template United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Travel Management Plan & Forest Plan Amendment Environmental Assessment Umpqua National Forest; Lane, Douglas and Jackson Counties, Oregon December 2014 For More Information Contact: Jane Beaulieu, Environmental Coordinator Umpqua National Forest 2900 NW Stewart Parkway Roseburg, OR 97471 Phone: (541) 957-3466 Email: [email protected] Fax: (541) 957-3495 U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication for program information (e.g. Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) please contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Contents Contents ............................................................................................................................................ i Chapter 1 Purpose and Need for Action ...................................................................................... - 1 - Background ............................................................................................................................. - 1 - Travel Management Rule .................................................................................................... - 1 - Planning Area Location and Environmental Setting ........................................................... - 1 - Current Management Direction ........................................................................................... - 3 - Purpose and Need .................................................................................................................... - 4 - Existing Condition ............................................................................................................... - 4 - Desired Condition ................................................................................................................ - 5 - Proposed Action ...................................................................................................................... - 5 - Decisions to be Made .............................................................................................................. - 6 - Relationship to Laws, Regulations, Other Planning Documents and Analyses ...................... - 6 - Laws and Regulations: ........................................................................................................ - 6 - Tiered Environmental Impact Statements ........................................................................... - 7 - Previous Access and Travel Management Plans and Local Assessments ........................... - 7 - Scoping.................................................................................................................................... - 8 - Issues and Concerns ................................................................................................................ - 8 - Concerns That Did Not Drive Alternatives: ........................................................................ - 9 - Issues That Drove Alternatives to the Proposed Action: ................................................... - 10 - Project Implementation ......................................................................................................... - 11 - Chapter 2 Alternatives, Including the Proposed Action ............................................................ - 13 - Introduction ........................................................................................................................... - 13 - Alternatives Considered, But Eliminated From Detailed Study ........................................... - 13 - Eliminate Seasonal Restrictions ........................................................................................ - 13 - Open, Close, Construct or Decommission Roads .............................................................. - 13 - Wilderness Proposal .......................................................................................................... - 14 - Previous Proposed Action (Alternative A) and Alternatives B and C ............................... - 14 - Alternatives Analyzed in Detail ............................................................................................ - 14 - Existing Condition ............................................................................................................. - 14 - Items Common to all Alternatives (including NO ACTION) ........................................... - 20 - Alternative 1: No Action ................................................................................................... - 21 - Action Alternatives ............................................................................................................ - 22 - Items Common to all Action Alternatives ......................................................................... - 22 - Alternative 2: Proposed Action ......................................................................................... - 23 - Alternative 3 ...................................................................................................................... - 23 - Alternative 4 ...................................................................................................................... - 24 - Alternative 5 ...................................................................................................................... - 25 - Alternative 6 ...................................................................................................................... - 26 - Comparison of Alternatives ............................................................................................... - 27 - CHAPTER 3 .............................................................................................................................. - 29 - Affected Environment and Environmental Effects ................................................................... - 29 - Introduction ........................................................................................................................... - 29 - Forest Transportation System - Roads .................................................................................. - 30 - Existing Condition ............................................................................................................. - 31 - Cumulative Effects ............................................................................................................ - 34 - Recreation ............................................................................................................................. - 35 - Management Direction ...................................................................................................... - 35 - Existing Condition ............................................................................................................. - 36 - i Alternative 1 - No Action .................................................................................................. - 43 - Effects Common to All Action Alternatives ..................................................................... - 44 - Alternative 2 – Proposed Action ....................................................................................... - 48 - Alternative 3 ...................................................................................................................... - 50 - Alternative 4 ...................................................................................................................... - 53 - Alternative 5 ...................................................................................................................... - 55 - Alternative 6 ...................................................................................................................... - 55 - Cumulative Effects ............................................................................................................ - 56 - Congressionally Designated Areas ....................................................................................... - 56 - Wilderness ......................................................................................................................... - 56 - Oregon Cascades Recreation Area (OCRA) ..................................................................... - 57 - Wild and Scenic Rivers ..................................................................................................... - 57 - Potential Wilderness Areas and Inventoried Roadless Areas ............................................ - 58 - Visual Resources ................................................................................................................... - 60 - Management Direction ...................................................................................................... - 60 - Existing Condition
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Roseburg District
    217 As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interest of all our people. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in Island Territories under U.S. administration. BLM/OR/WA/PL-95/020+1792 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management ROSEBURG DISTRICT RECORD OF DECISION and RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by Roseburg District Office June 1995 Blank Table of Contents RECORD OF DECISION Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Alternatives Considered and Rationale for Decision ............................................................................................... 3 Environmentally Preferable Alternative ................................................................................................................... 5 Implementation .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation
    Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation Establishment of the 95-foot wide construction corridor and TEWAs would likely remove individuals of H. caeruleus and modify microclimate conditions around individuals that are not removed. The removal of forests and host trees and disturbance to soil could negatively affect H. caeruleus in adjacent areas by removing its habitat, disturbing the roots of host trees, and affecting its mycorrhizal association with the trees, potentially affecting site persistence. Restored portions of the corridor and TEWAs would be dominated by early seral vegetation for approximately 30 years, which would result in long-term changes to habitat conditions. A 30-foot wide portion of the corridor would be maintained in low-growing vegetation for pipeline maintenance and would not provide habitat for the species during the life of the project. Hygrophorus caeruleus is not likely to persist at one of the sites in the project area because of the extent of impacts and the proximity of the recorded observation to the corridor. Hygrophorus caeruleus is likely to persist at the remaining three sites in the project area (MP 168.8 and MP 172.4 (north), and MP 172.5-172.7) because the majority of observations within the sites are more than 90 feet from the corridor, where direct effects are not anticipated and indirect effects are unlikely. The site at MP 168.8 is in a forested area on an east-facing slope, and a paved road occurs through the southeast part of the site. Four out of five observations are more than 90 feet southwest of the corridor and are not likely to be directly or indirectly affected by the PCGP Project based on the distance from the corridor, extent of forests surrounding the observations, and proximity to an existing open corridor (the road), indicating the species is likely resilient to edge- related effects at the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Mushrumors the Newsletter of the Northwest Mushroomers Association Volume 20 Issue 3 September - November 2009
    MushRumors The Newsletter of the Northwest Mushroomers Association Volume 20 Issue 3 September - November 2009 2009 Mushroom Season Blasts into October with a Flourish A Surprising Turnout at the Annual Fall Show by Our Fungal Friends, and a Visit by David Arora Highlighted this Extraordinary Year for the Northwest Mushroomers On the heels of a year where the weather in Northwest Washington could be described as anything but nor- mal, to the surprise of many, include yours truly, it was actually a good year for mushrooms and the Northwest Mushroomers Association shined again at our traditional fall exhibit. The members, as well as the mushrooms, rose to the occasion, despite brutal conditions for collecting which included a sideways driving rain (which we photo by Pam Anderson thought had come too late), and even a thunderstorm, as we prepared to gather for the greatly anticipated sorting of our catch at the hallowed Bloedel Donovan Community Building. I wondered, not without some trepidation, about what fungi would actually show up for this years’ event. Buck McAdoo, Dick Morrison, and I had spent several harrowing hours some- what lost in the woods off the South Pass Road in a torrential downpour, all the while being filmed for posterity by Buck’s step-son, Travis, a videographer creating a documentary about mushrooming. I had to wonder about the resolve of our mem- bers to go forth in such conditions in or- In This Issue: Fabulous first impressions: Marjorie Hooks der to find the mush- David Arora Visits Bellingham crafted another artwork for the centerpiece.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mycological Society of San Francisco • Dec. 2015, Vol. 67:04
    The Mycological Society of San Francisco • Dec. 2015, vol. 67:04 Table of Contents Mushroom of the Month by K. Litchfield 1 Mushroom of the Month: Quick Start Forays Amanita muscaria by P. Koski 1 The Santa Mushroom, Fly Agaric President Post by B. Wenck-Reilly 2 Hospitality / Holiday Dinner 2015 4 Ken Litchfield Culinary Corner by H. Lunan 5 Brain Chemistry by B. Sommer 6 This month’s mushroom profile is one of my favorites, De- Mendo 2015 Camp by C. Haney 7 cember’s Santa mushroom. While prevalent at other times MycoMendoMondo by W. So 9 of the year in other places with more extensive rainy sea- Announcements / Events 10 sons, in the SF bay area the height of its season is the holi- 2015 Fungus Fair poster & program 11 days. One of the most elegant, beautiful, and recognizable Fungal Jumble & Gadget Obs by W. So 14 mushrooms in the world, the Santa mushroom is not only Cultivation Quarters by K. Litchfield 15 cosmopolitan and common, it is rich in lore and stately in Mushroom Sightings by P. Pelous 16 demeanor, yet cuddly and not lugubrious, just like Santa Calendar 17 himself. Decked in cheery cherry red and decoupaged with puffs of fluffy white, the Santa’s cap jingles atop its ivory bearded veil leading down the long white chimney stipe to URBAN PARK QUICK START FORAYS the skirty cummerbund constricting the top of the bulbous November 14 Quick Start Foray Report jolly belly. by Paul Koski One of the many There was hope for finding lots of fungi after fruits of the roots a couple of rainy days in the week before the foray but of the pine, the after some preliminary scouting in Golden Gate Park, Santa’s red and not many mushrooms were showing up.
    [Show full text]
  • Mushrooms of Southwestern BC Latin Name Comment Habitat Edibility
    Mushrooms of Southwestern BC Latin name Comment Habitat Edibility L S 13 12 11 10 9 8 6 5 4 3 90 Abortiporus biennis Blushing rosette On ground from buried hardwood Unknown O06 O V Agaricus albolutescens Amber-staining Agaricus On ground in woods Choice, disagrees with some D06 N N Agaricus arvensis Horse mushroom In grassy places Choice, disagrees with some D06 N F FV V FV V V N Agaricus augustus The prince Under trees in disturbed soil Choice, disagrees with some D06 N V FV FV FV FV V V V FV N Agaricus bernardii Salt-loving Agaricus In sandy soil often near beaches Choice D06 N Agaricus bisporus Button mushroom, was A. brunnescens Cultivated, and as escapee Edible D06 N F N Agaricus bitorquis Sidewalk mushroom In hard packed, disturbed soil Edible D06 N F N Agaricus brunnescens (old name) now A. bisporus D06 F N Agaricus campestris Meadow mushroom In meadows, pastures Choice D06 N V FV F V F FV N Agaricus comtulus Small slender agaricus In grassy places Not recommended D06 N V FV N Agaricus diminutivus group Diminutive agariicus, many similar species On humus in woods Similar to poisonous species D06 O V V Agaricus dulcidulus Diminutive agaric, in diminitivus group On humus in woods Similar to poisonous species D06 O V V Agaricus hondensis Felt-ringed agaricus In needle duff and among twigs Poisonous to many D06 N V V F N Agaricus integer In grassy places often with moss Edible D06 N V Agaricus meleagris (old name) now A moelleri or A.
    [Show full text]
  • Rickenella Swartzii (Fr.) Kuyper ROD Name Rickenella Setipes Family Tricholomataceae Morphological Habit Mushroom
    S3 - 97 Rickenella swartzii (Fr.) Kuyper ROD name Rickenella setipes Family Tricholomataceae Morphological Habit mushroom Description: CAP 5-15 mm in diam., plano-convex, plano-umbilicate to deeply depressed, pellucid-striate to subsulcate, surface hygrophanous, moist, pruinose overall, dark violet- brown to dark sepia and margin vinaceous cinnamon, yellow-brown, becoming paler with moisture loss to deep brown-drab, violet gray or violet-brown on the disc, and margin pink- cinnamon, avellaneous or yellow-tan. GILLS deeply decurrent, in age becoming anastomosed, rugose or veined, white to pale cream, pruinose, edges concolorous, fimbriate. STEM 20-50 (-70) x 0.5-2 mm, central, cartilaginous, pruinose to pubescent overall or with base white-fibrillose, apex dark violet-brown, black-sepia or sordid violet-gray, base yellow-brown to pink-cinnamon. BASIDIA 15-22 x 4-5 µm, clavate, 4 spored. CHEILOCYSTIDIA scattered to abundant, 35-66 x 8-14 (-18) µm, ventricose-subcapitate to fusiform- subcapitate, hyaline. PLEUROCYSTIDIA scattered, similar to the cheilocystidia. PILEIPELLIS a cutis with numerous projecting pileocystidia. PILEOCYSTIDIA 50-90 x 8-18 µm, similar to the cheilocystidia. CAULOCYSTIDIA numerous, similar to cheilocystidia. CLAMP CONNECTIONS present. SPORES ellipsoid, (4-) 5-7 x 2-3 (-3.5) µm, smooth, hyaline, inamyloid, thin walled. Distinguishing Features: In the field it may look slightly similar to Omphalina pyxidata and Phytoconis ericetorum, but these species differ in lacking a violaceous cap disc and stem apex, and in lacking conspicuous cystidia on cap, gills, and stem. Distribution: Widespread across northern temperate forests. CALIFORNIA, Del Norte Co., Crescent City; OREGON, Lane Co., Siuslaw National Forest (SNF), Siltcoos River; Lincoln Co., SNF, Canal Creek; SNF, Five Rivers; WASHINGTON, King Co., University of Washington campus; Pierce Co., Mount Rainier National Park (MRNP), Longmire; MRNP, Tahoma Creek; Snohomish Co., Mount Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest, Barlow Pass; Meadowdale.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey & Manage Species Category Assignment
    Table 1-1 June 2002 Table 1-1. Species Included in Survey and Manage Standards and Guidelines and Category Assignment (June 2002) TAXA GROUP Note: Where taxon has more than one name indicated, first name is current Species accepted name, second one (in parentheses) is name used in NFP (Table C-3). Category FUNGI Acanthophysium farlowii (Aleurodiscus farlowii) B Albatrellus avellaneus B Albatrellus caeruleoporus B Albatrellus ellisii B Albatrellus flettii, In Washington and California B Alpova alexsmithii B Alpova olivaceotinctus B Arcangeliella camphorata (Arcangeliella sp. nov. #Trappe 12382; Arcangeliella sp. nov. #Trappe B 12359) Arcangeliella crassa B Arcangeliella lactarioides B Asterophora lycoperdoides B Asterophora parasitica B Baeospora myriadophylla B Balsamia nigrens (Balsamia nigra) B Boletus haematinus B Boletus pulcherrimus B Bondarzewia mesenterica (Bondarzewia montana), In Washington and California B Bridgeoporus nobilissimus (Oxyporus nobilissimus) A Cantharellus subalbidus, In Washington and California D Catathelasma ventricosa B Chalciporus piperatus (Boletus piperatus) D Chamonixia caespitosa (Chamonixia pacifica sp. nov. #Trappe #12768) B Choiromyces alveolatus B Choiromyces venosus B Chroogomphus loculatus B Chrysomphalina grossula B Clavariadelphus ligula B Clavariadelphus occidentalis (Clavariadelphus pistillaris) B Clavariadelphus sachalinensis B Clavariadelphus subfastigiatus B Clavariadelphus truncates (syn. Clavariadelphus borealis) D Clavulina castanopes v. lignicola (Clavulina ornatipes) B Clitocybe senilis
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Chapter 3 Conservation and Management of Forest Fungi in The
    Randy Molina, David Pilz, Jane Smith, Susie Dunham, Tina Dreisbach, Thomas O’Dell & Michael Castellano (2001). Conservation and management of forest fungi in the Pacific Northwestern United States: an integrated ecosystem approach. Chapter 3 in Fungal Conservation: Issues and Solutions (ed. Moore, D., Nauta, M. M., Evans, S. E. & Rotheroe, M.). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K. Chapter 3 Conservation and management of forest fungi in the Pacific Northwestern United States: an integrated ecosystem approach RANDY MOLINA, DAVID PILZ, JANE SMITH, SUSIE DUNHAM, TINA DREISBACH, THOMAS O’DELL & MICHAEL CASTELLANO Introduction The vast forests of the Pacific Northwest region of the United States, an area outlined by the states of Oregon, Washington, and Idaho, are well known for their rich diversity of macrofungi. The forests are dominated by trees in the Pinaceae with about 20 species in the genera Abies, Larix, Picea, Pinus, Pseudotsuga, and Tsuga. All form ectomycorrhizas with fungi in the Basidiomycota, Ascomycota, and a few Zygomycota. Other ectomycorrhizal genera include Alnus, Arbutus, Arctostaphylos, Castinopsis, Corylus, Lithocarpus, Populus, Quercus, and Salix, often occurring as understory or early-successional trees. Ectomycorrhizal fungi number in the thousands; as many as 2,000 species associate with widespread dominant trees such as Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) (Trappe, 1977). The Pacific Northwest region also contains various ecozones on diverse soil types that range from extremely wet coastal forests to xeric interior forests, found at elevations from sea level to timber line at 2,000 to 3,000 metres. The combination of diverse ectomycorrhizal host trees inhabiting steep environmental and physical gradients has yielded perhaps the richest forest mycota of any temperate forest zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes, Outline and Divergence Times of Basidiomycota
    Fungal Diversity (2019) 99:105–367 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-019-00435-4 (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,- volV) Notes, outline and divergence times of Basidiomycota 1,2,3 1,4 3 5 5 Mao-Qiang He • Rui-Lin Zhao • Kevin D. Hyde • Dominik Begerow • Martin Kemler • 6 7 8,9 10 11 Andrey Yurkov • Eric H. C. McKenzie • Olivier Raspe´ • Makoto Kakishima • Santiago Sa´nchez-Ramı´rez • 12 13 14 15 16 Else C. Vellinga • Roy Halling • Viktor Papp • Ivan V. Zmitrovich • Bart Buyck • 8,9 3 17 18 1 Damien Ertz • Nalin N. Wijayawardene • Bao-Kai Cui • Nathan Schoutteten • Xin-Zhan Liu • 19 1 1,3 1 1 1 Tai-Hui Li • Yi-Jian Yao • Xin-Yu Zhu • An-Qi Liu • Guo-Jie Li • Ming-Zhe Zhang • 1 1 20 21,22 23 Zhi-Lin Ling • Bin Cao • Vladimı´r Antonı´n • Teun Boekhout • Bianca Denise Barbosa da Silva • 18 24 25 26 27 Eske De Crop • Cony Decock • Ba´lint Dima • Arun Kumar Dutta • Jack W. Fell • 28 29 30 31 Jo´ zsef Geml • Masoomeh Ghobad-Nejhad • Admir J. Giachini • Tatiana B. Gibertoni • 32 33,34 17 35 Sergio P. Gorjo´ n • Danny Haelewaters • Shuang-Hui He • Brendan P. Hodkinson • 36 37 38 39 40,41 Egon Horak • Tamotsu Hoshino • Alfredo Justo • Young Woon Lim • Nelson Menolli Jr. • 42 43,44 45 46 47 Armin Mesˇic´ • Jean-Marc Moncalvo • Gregory M. Mueller • La´szlo´ G. Nagy • R. Henrik Nilsson • 48 48 49 2 Machiel Noordeloos • Jorinde Nuytinck • Takamichi Orihara • Cheewangkoon Ratchadawan • 50,51 52 53 Mario Rajchenberg • Alexandre G.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Diverging Clades of Agaricomycetidae Dominated by Corticioid Forms
    Mycologia, 102(4), 2010, pp. 865–880. DOI: 10.3852/09-288 # 2010 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897 Amylocorticiales ord. nov. and Jaapiales ord. nov.: Early diverging clades of Agaricomycetidae dominated by corticioid forms Manfred Binder1 sister group of the remainder of the Agaricomyceti- Clark University, Biology Department, Lasry Center for dae, suggesting that the greatest radiation of pileate- Biosciences, 15 Maywood Street, Worcester, stipitate mushrooms resulted from the elaboration of Massachusetts 01601 resupinate ancestors. Karl-Henrik Larsson Key words: morphological evolution, multigene Go¨teborg University, Department of Plant and datasets, rpb1 and rpb2 primers Environmental Sciences, Box 461, SE 405 30, Go¨teborg, Sweden INTRODUCTION P. Brandon Matheny The Agaricomycetes includes approximately 21 000 University of Tennessee, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 334 Hesler Biology Building, described species (Kirk et al. 2008) that are domi- Knoxville, Tennessee 37996 nated by taxa with complex fruiting bodies, including agarics, polypores, coral fungi and gasteromycetes. David S. Hibbett Intermixed with these forms are numerous lineages Clark University, Biology Department, Lasry Center for Biosciences, 15 Maywood Street, Worcester, of corticioid fungi, which have inconspicuous, resu- Massachusetts 01601 pinate fruiting bodies (Binder et al. 2005; Larsson et al. 2004, Larsson 2007). No fewer than 13 of the 17 currently recognized orders of Agaricomycetes con- Abstract: The Agaricomycetidae is one of the most tain corticioid forms, and three, the Atheliales, morphologically diverse clades of Basidiomycota that Corticiales, and Trechisporales, contain only corti- includes the well known Agaricales and Boletales, cioid forms (Hibbett 2007, Hibbett et al. 2007). which are dominated by pileate-stipitate forms, and Larsson (2007) presented a preliminary classification the more obscure Atheliales, which is a relatively small in which corticioid forms are distributed across 41 group of resupinate taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • Suomen Helttasienten Ja Tattien Ekologia, Levinneisyys Ja Uhanalaisuus
    Suomen ympäristö 769 LUONTO JA LUONNONVARAT Pertti Salo, Tuomo Niemelä, Ulla Nummela-Salo ja Esteri Ohenoja (toim.) Suomen helttasienten ja tattien ekologia, levinneisyys ja uhanalaisuus .......................... SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUS Suomen ympäristö 769 Pertti Salo, Tuomo Niemelä, Ulla Nummela-Salo ja Esteri Ohenoja (toim.) Suomen helttasienten ja tattien ekologia, levinneisyys ja uhanalaisuus SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUS Viittausohje Viitatessa tämän raportin lukuihin, käytetään lukujen otsikoita ja lukujen kirjoittajien nimiä: Esim. luku 5.2: Kytövuori, I., Nummela-Salo, U., Ohenoja, E., Salo, P. & Vauras, J. 2005: Helttasienten ja tattien levinneisyystaulukko. Julk.: Salo, P., Niemelä, T., Nummela-Salo, U. & Ohenoja, E. (toim.). Suomen helttasienten ja tattien ekologia, levin- neisyys ja uhanalaisuus. Suomen ympäristökeskus, Helsinki. Suomen ympäristö 769. Ss. 109-224. Recommended citation E.g. chapter 5.2: Kytövuori, I., Nummela-Salo, U., Ohenoja, E., Salo, P. & Vauras, J. 2005: Helttasienten ja tattien levinneisyystaulukko. Distribution table of agarics and boletes in Finland. Publ.: Salo, P., Niemelä, T., Nummela- Salo, U. & Ohenoja, E. (eds.). Suomen helttasienten ja tattien ekologia, levinneisyys ja uhanalaisuus. Suomen ympäristökeskus, Helsinki. Suomen ympäristö 769. Pp. 109-224. Julkaisu on saatavana myös Internetistä: www.ymparisto.fi/julkaisut ISBN 952-11-1996-9 (nid.) ISBN 952-11-1997-7 (PDF) ISSN 1238-7312 Kannen kuvat / Cover pictures Vasen ylä / Top left: Paljakkaa. Utsjoki. Treeless alpine tundra zone. Utsjoki. Kuva / Photo: Esteri Ohenoja Vasen ala / Down left: Jalopuulehtoa. Parainen, Lenholm. Quercus robur forest. Parainen, Lenholm. Kuva / Photo: Tuomo Niemelä Oikea ylä / Top right: Lehtolohisieni (Laccaria amethystina). Amethyst Deceiver (Laccaria amethystina). Kuva / Photo: Pertti Salo Oikea ala / Down right: Vanhaa metsää. Sodankylä, Luosto. Old virgin forest. Sodankylä, Luosto. Kuva / Photo: Tuomo Niemelä Takakansi / Back cover: Ukonsieni (Macrolepiota procera).
    [Show full text]
  • Spor E Pr I N Ts
    SPOR E PR I N TS BULLETIN OF THE PUGET SOUND MYCOLOGICAL SOCIETY Number 506 November 2014 PSMS/NAMA FORAY Teddy Basladynski There were so many edibles brought in that Reba Tam created an hours-long impromptu mycophagy event and cooking demo to On a sunny October 9, against a spectacular backdrop of Mt. feed the excited crowd. Rainier, members of the North American Mycological Society Overall, the verdict from the attendees and presenters is that the descended upon Camp Arnold in Eatonville, Washington. They event was a great success and a fitting tribute to Patrice. NAMA were here to attend the Patrice Benson Memorial NAMA Foray President David Rust writes, “I had a lot of attendees come up hosted by PSMS. Over 300 people from 28 states, 4 Canadian to me to say what a great time they were having (and others provinces, Belgium, Finland, Estonia, and Italy gathered for this who thanked me, to which I replied that PSMS had done it all). event which sold out in 19 days back in May. People who had never been to a NAMA foray, people who have Attendees were offered a wide range of lectures and workshops been coming for years, and several mycologists spoke about how from top-notch mycologists during the day to keynote speakers wonderful it was and had a worthwhile experience.” Jim Trappe and Paul Stamets presenting in the evenings. Some arrived a day early to study watercolor painting with Sasha On top of all that, Joshua Birkebak, who joined PSMS 15 years Viazmensky or create mushroom-dyed textile art with Alissa Allen ago at the age of 10, officially announced the naming of a mush- and Liann Finnerty.
    [Show full text]