DOCSLIB.ORG

Roseburg District

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Roseburg District 217 As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interest of all our people. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in Island Territories under U.S. administration. BLM/OR/WA/PL-95/020+1792 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management ROSEBURG DISTRICT RECORD OF DECISION and RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by Roseburg District Office June 1995 Blank Table of Contents RECORD OF DECISION Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Alternatives Considered and Rationale for Decision ............................................................................................... 3 Environmentally Preferable Alternative ................................................................................................................... 5 Implementation ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Valid Existing Rights ................................................................................................................................................ 6 Administrative Actions.............................................................................................................................................. 6 Mitigation and Monitoring ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Public Involvement ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Recommendation/Approval ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Tables R-1 Summary of Land Allocations and Management Actions/Direction ............................................................ 8 R-2 Summary of Environmental Consequences, Comparison of Alternatives ................................................ 11 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN The Planning Area ................................................................................................................................................. 15 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................................................................. 15 Relationship of the RMP to BLM Policies, Programs, and other Plans................................................................. 16 Planning Process and Criteria ............................................................................................................................... 17 The Resource Management Plan .......................................................................................................................... 18 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 18 Vision ........................................................................................................................................................ 18 Strategy ..................................................................................................................................................... 18 Ecological Principles for Management of Late-Successional Forests ..................................................... 19 Aquatic Conservation Strategy ................................................................................................................. 19 Land Use Allocations and Resource Programs ........................................................................................ 21 Management Actions/Direction for All Land Use Allocations and Resource Programs ........................................ 21 Survey and Manage Species .................................................................................................................... 22 Protection Buffers ..................................................................................................................................... 23 Specific Land Use Allocations (organized by Objectives, Land Use Allocations, and Resource Programs) ........ 23 Riparian Reserves .................................................................................................................................... 23 Late-Successional Reserves .................................................................................................................... 29 Adaptive Management Areas.................................................................................................................... 32 Matrix ........................................................................................................................................................ 33 Resource Programs (organized by Objectives, Land Use Allocations, and Resource Programs) ....................... 34 Air Quality ................................................................................................................................................. 35 Water and Soils ......................................................................................................................................... 35 Wildlife Habitat .......................................................................................................................................... 37 Fish Habitat ............................................................................................................................................... 40 Special Status and SEIS Special Attention Species ................................................................................ 40 Special Areas ............................................................................................................................................ 50 Cultural Resources Including American Indian Values .............................................................................51 Visual Resources ...................................................................................................................................... 52 Wild and Scenic Rivers ............................................................................................................................. 53 Wilderness ................................................................................................................................................ 54 Rural Interface Areas ................................................................................................................................ 54 Socioeconomic Conditions ....................................................................................................................... 55 Recreation ................................................................................................................................................. 55 Timber Resources ..................................................................................................................................... 60 Special Forest Products............................................................................................................................ 65 i Energy and Minerals ................................................................................................................................. 66 Land Tenure Adjustments ......................................................................................................................... 67 Rights of Way ............................................................................................................................................ 69 Access ...................................................................................................................................................... 71 Withdrawals .............................................................................................................................................. 71 Roads ........................................................................................................................................................ 72 Noxious Weeds ......................................................................................................................................... 74 Hazardous Materials ................................................................................................................................. 75 Fire/Fuels Management ............................................................................................................................ 75 Coordination and Consultation .............................................................................................................................. 78 Use of the Completed Plan ...................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rickenella Swartzii (Fr.) Kuyper ROD Name Rickenella Setipes Family Tricholomataceae Morphological Habit Mushroom
    S3 - 97 Rickenella swartzii (Fr.) Kuyper ROD name Rickenella setipes Family Tricholomataceae Morphological Habit mushroom Description: CAP 5-15 mm in diam., plano-convex, plano-umbilicate to deeply depressed, pellucid-striate to subsulcate, surface hygrophanous, moist, pruinose overall, dark violet- brown to dark sepia and margin vinaceous cinnamon, yellow-brown, becoming paler with moisture loss to deep brown-drab, violet gray or violet-brown on the disc, and margin pink- cinnamon, avellaneous or yellow-tan. GILLS deeply decurrent, in age becoming anastomosed, rugose or veined, white to pale cream, pruinose, edges concolorous, fimbriate. STEM 20-50 (-70) x 0.5-2 mm, central, cartilaginous, pruinose to pubescent overall or with base white-fibrillose, apex dark violet-brown, black-sepia or sordid violet-gray, base yellow-brown to pink-cinnamon. BASIDIA 15-22 x 4-5 µm, clavate, 4 spored. CHEILOCYSTIDIA scattered to abundant, 35-66 x 8-14 (-18) µm, ventricose-subcapitate to fusiform- subcapitate, hyaline. PLEUROCYSTIDIA scattered, similar to the cheilocystidia. PILEIPELLIS a cutis with numerous projecting pileocystidia. PILEOCYSTIDIA 50-90 x 8-18 µm, similar to the cheilocystidia. CAULOCYSTIDIA numerous, similar to cheilocystidia. CLAMP CONNECTIONS present. SPORES ellipsoid, (4-) 5-7 x 2-3 (-3.5) µm, smooth, hyaline, inamyloid, thin walled. Distinguishing Features: In the field it may look slightly similar to Omphalina pyxidata and Phytoconis ericetorum, but these species differ in lacking a violaceous cap disc and stem apex, and in lacking conspicuous cystidia on cap, gills, and stem. Distribution: Widespread across northern temperate forests. CALIFORNIA, Del Norte Co., Crescent City; OREGON, Lane Co., Siuslaw National Forest (SNF), Siltcoos River; Lincoln Co., SNF, Canal Creek; SNF, Five Rivers; WASHINGTON, King Co., University of Washington campus; Pierce Co., Mount Rainier National Park (MRNP), Longmire; MRNP, Tahoma Creek; Snohomish Co., Mount Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest, Barlow Pass; Meadowdale.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Chapter 3 Conservation and Management of Forest Fungi in The
    Randy Molina, David Pilz, Jane Smith, Susie Dunham, Tina Dreisbach, Thomas O’Dell & Michael Castellano (2001). Conservation and management of forest fungi in the Pacific Northwestern United States: an integrated ecosystem approach. Chapter 3 in Fungal Conservation: Issues and Solutions (ed. Moore, D., Nauta, M. M., Evans, S. E. & Rotheroe, M.). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K. Chapter 3 Conservation and management of forest fungi in the Pacific Northwestern United States: an integrated ecosystem approach RANDY MOLINA, DAVID PILZ, JANE SMITH, SUSIE DUNHAM, TINA DREISBACH, THOMAS O’DELL & MICHAEL CASTELLANO Introduction The vast forests of the Pacific Northwest region of the United States, an area outlined by the states of Oregon, Washington, and Idaho, are well known for their rich diversity of macrofungi. The forests are dominated by trees in the Pinaceae with about 20 species in the genera Abies, Larix, Picea, Pinus, Pseudotsuga, and Tsuga. All form ectomycorrhizas with fungi in the Basidiomycota, Ascomycota, and a few Zygomycota. Other ectomycorrhizal genera include Alnus, Arbutus, Arctostaphylos, Castinopsis, Corylus, Lithocarpus, Populus, Quercus, and Salix, often occurring as understory or early-successional trees. Ectomycorrhizal fungi number in the thousands; as many as 2,000 species associate with widespread dominant trees such as Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) (Trappe, 1977). The Pacific Northwest region also contains various ecozones on diverse soil types that range from extremely wet coastal forests to xeric interior forests, found at elevations from sea level to timber line at 2,000 to 3,000 metres. The combination of diverse ectomycorrhizal host trees inhabiting steep environmental and physical gradients has yielded perhaps the richest forest mycota of any temperate forest zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes, Outline and Divergence Times of Basidiomycota
    Fungal Diversity (2019) 99:105–367 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-019-00435-4 (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,- volV) Notes, outline and divergence times of Basidiomycota 1,2,3 1,4 3 5 5 Mao-Qiang He • Rui-Lin Zhao • Kevin D. Hyde • Dominik Begerow • Martin Kemler • 6 7 8,9 10 11 Andrey Yurkov • Eric H. C. McKenzie • Olivier Raspe´ • Makoto Kakishima • Santiago Sa´nchez-Ramı´rez • 12 13 14 15 16 Else C. Vellinga • Roy Halling • Viktor Papp • Ivan V. Zmitrovich • Bart Buyck • 8,9 3 17 18 1 Damien Ertz • Nalin N. Wijayawardene • Bao-Kai Cui • Nathan Schoutteten • Xin-Zhan Liu • 19 1 1,3 1 1 1 Tai-Hui Li • Yi-Jian Yao • Xin-Yu Zhu • An-Qi Liu • Guo-Jie Li • Ming-Zhe Zhang • 1 1 20 21,22 23 Zhi-Lin Ling • Bin Cao • Vladimı´r Antonı´n • Teun Boekhout • Bianca Denise Barbosa da Silva • 18 24 25 26 27 Eske De Crop • Cony Decock • Ba´lint Dima • Arun Kumar Dutta • Jack W. Fell • 28 29 30 31 Jo´ zsef Geml • Masoomeh Ghobad-Nejhad • Admir J. Giachini • Tatiana B. Gibertoni • 32 33,34 17 35 Sergio P. Gorjo´ n • Danny Haelewaters • Shuang-Hui He • Brendan P. Hodkinson • 36 37 38 39 40,41 Egon Horak • Tamotsu Hoshino • Alfredo Justo • Young Woon Lim • Nelson Menolli Jr. • 42 43,44 45 46 47 Armin Mesˇic´ • Jean-Marc Moncalvo • Gregory M. Mueller • La´szlo´ G. Nagy • R. Henrik Nilsson • 48 48 49 2 Machiel Noordeloos • Jorinde Nuytinck • Takamichi Orihara • Cheewangkoon Ratchadawan • 50,51 52 53 Mario Rajchenberg • Alexandre G.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Diverging Clades of Agaricomycetidae Dominated by Corticioid Forms
    Mycologia, 102(4), 2010, pp. 865–880. DOI: 10.3852/09-288 # 2010 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897 Amylocorticiales ord. nov. and Jaapiales ord. nov.: Early diverging clades of Agaricomycetidae dominated by corticioid forms Manfred Binder1 sister group of the remainder of the Agaricomyceti- Clark University, Biology Department, Lasry Center for dae, suggesting that the greatest radiation of pileate- Biosciences, 15 Maywood Street, Worcester, stipitate mushrooms resulted from the elaboration of Massachusetts 01601 resupinate ancestors. Karl-Henrik Larsson Key words: morphological evolution, multigene Go¨teborg University, Department of Plant and datasets, rpb1 and rpb2 primers Environmental Sciences, Box 461, SE 405 30, Go¨teborg, Sweden INTRODUCTION P. Brandon Matheny The Agaricomycetes includes approximately 21 000 University of Tennessee, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 334 Hesler Biology Building, described species (Kirk et al. 2008) that are domi- Knoxville, Tennessee 37996 nated by taxa with complex fruiting bodies, including agarics, polypores, coral fungi and gasteromycetes. David S. Hibbett Intermixed with these forms are numerous lineages Clark University, Biology Department, Lasry Center for Biosciences, 15 Maywood Street, Worcester, of corticioid fungi, which have inconspicuous, resu- Massachusetts 01601 pinate fruiting bodies (Binder et al. 2005; Larsson et al. 2004, Larsson 2007). No fewer than 13 of the 17 currently recognized orders of Agaricomycetes con- Abstract: The Agaricomycetidae is one of the most tain corticioid forms, and three, the Atheliales, morphologically diverse clades of Basidiomycota that Corticiales, and Trechisporales, contain only corti- includes the well known Agaricales and Boletales, cioid forms (Hibbett 2007, Hibbett et al. 2007). which are dominated by pileate-stipitate forms, and Larsson (2007) presented a preliminary classification the more obscure Atheliales, which is a relatively small in which corticioid forms are distributed across 41 group of resupinate taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • Suomen Helttasienten Ja Tattien Ekologia, Levinneisyys Ja Uhanalaisuus
    Suomen ympäristö 769 LUONTO JA LUONNONVARAT Pertti Salo, Tuomo Niemelä, Ulla Nummela-Salo ja Esteri Ohenoja (toim.) Suomen helttasienten ja tattien ekologia, levinneisyys ja uhanalaisuus .......................... SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUS Suomen ympäristö 769 Pertti Salo, Tuomo Niemelä, Ulla Nummela-Salo ja Esteri Ohenoja (toim.) Suomen helttasienten ja tattien ekologia, levinneisyys ja uhanalaisuus SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUS Viittausohje Viitatessa tämän raportin lukuihin, käytetään lukujen otsikoita ja lukujen kirjoittajien nimiä: Esim. luku 5.2: Kytövuori, I., Nummela-Salo, U., Ohenoja, E., Salo, P. & Vauras, J. 2005: Helttasienten ja tattien levinneisyystaulukko. Julk.: Salo, P., Niemelä, T., Nummela-Salo, U. & Ohenoja, E. (toim.). Suomen helttasienten ja tattien ekologia, levin- neisyys ja uhanalaisuus. Suomen ympäristökeskus, Helsinki. Suomen ympäristö 769. Ss. 109-224. Recommended citation E.g. chapter 5.2: Kytövuori, I., Nummela-Salo, U., Ohenoja, E., Salo, P. & Vauras, J. 2005: Helttasienten ja tattien levinneisyystaulukko. Distribution table of agarics and boletes in Finland. Publ.: Salo, P., Niemelä, T., Nummela- Salo, U. & Ohenoja, E. (eds.). Suomen helttasienten ja tattien ekologia, levinneisyys ja uhanalaisuus. Suomen ympäristökeskus, Helsinki. Suomen ympäristö 769. Pp. 109-224. Julkaisu on saatavana myös Internetistä: www.ymparisto.fi/julkaisut ISBN 952-11-1996-9 (nid.) ISBN 952-11-1997-7 (PDF) ISSN 1238-7312 Kannen kuvat / Cover pictures Vasen ylä / Top left: Paljakkaa. Utsjoki. Treeless alpine tundra zone. Utsjoki. Kuva / Photo: Esteri Ohenoja Vasen ala / Down left: Jalopuulehtoa. Parainen, Lenholm. Quercus robur forest. Parainen, Lenholm. Kuva / Photo: Tuomo Niemelä Oikea ylä / Top right: Lehtolohisieni (Laccaria amethystina). Amethyst Deceiver (Laccaria amethystina). Kuva / Photo: Pertti Salo Oikea ala / Down right: Vanhaa metsää. Sodankylä, Luosto. Old virgin forest. Sodankylä, Luosto. Kuva / Photo: Tuomo Niemelä Takakansi / Back cover: Ukonsieni (Macrolepiota procera).
    [Show full text]
  • Agaricineae, Agaricales) for Accommodating the Genera Mythicomyces and Stagnicola, and Simocybe Parvispora Reconsidered
    VOLUME 3 JUNE 2019 Fungal Systematics and Evolution PAGES 41–56 doi.org/10.3114/fuse.2019.03.05 Mythicomycetaceae fam. nov. (Agaricineae, Agaricales) for accommodating the genera Mythicomyces and Stagnicola, and Simocybe parvispora reconsidered A. Vizzini1*, G. Consiglio2, M. Marchetti3 1Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Torino, Viale P.A. Mattioli 25, I-10125 Torino, Italy 2Via Ronzani 61, I-40033 Casalecchio di Reno (Bologna), Italy 3Via Molise 8, I-56123 Pisa, Italy Key words: *Corresponding author: [email protected] Agaricomycetes Basidiomycota Abstract: The analysis of a combined dataset including 5.8S (ITS) rDNA, 18S rDNA, 28S rDNA, and rpb2 data from molecular systematics species of the Agaricineae (Agaricoid clade) supports a shared monophyletic origin of the monotypic genera new taxa Mythicomyces and Stagnicola. The new family Mythicomycetaceae, sister to Psathyrellaceae, is here proposed Phaeocollybia to name this clade, which is characterised, within the dark-spored agarics, by basidiomata with a mycenoid to Psathyrellaceae phaeocollybioid habit, absence of veils, a cartilaginous-horny, often tapering stipe, which discolours dark brown taxonomy towards the base, a greyish brown, pale hazel brown spore deposit, smooth or minutely punctate-verruculose spores without a germ pore, cheilocystidia always present, as metuloids (thick-walled inocybe-like elements) or as thin- walled elements, pleurocystidia, when present, as metuloids, pileipellis as a thin ixocutis without cystidioid elements, clamp-connections present everywhere, and growth on wood debris in wet habitats of boreal, subalpine to montane coniferous forests. Simocybe parvispora from Spain (two collections, including the holotype), which clusters with all the sequenced collections ofStagnicola perplexa from Canada, USA, France and Sweden, must be regarded as a later synonym of the latter.
    [Show full text]
  • Calf-Copeland Restoration Project Area
    Final Environmental Impact Statement Rogue-River Siskiyou National Forest and the Klamath Ranger District (KRD) of the Fremont-Winema National Forest. A single male wolf has been detected repeatedly to the Northeast along the Williamson River. It is probable that individual wolves may disperse through the project area. The Calf-Copeland project area provides deer and elk, as well as other prey species for wolves year-round. In addition, there is an AKWA located on the southernmost portion of the KRD commonly referred to as the Keno wolves (Figure 58). Figure 58. Areas of known wolf activity associated with the Rogue, Keno, OR-28, and OR-25 wolves. 258 Final Environmental Impact Statement Figure 59. Areas of known wolf activity associated with the Indigo wolves. Direct and Indirect Effects Alternative 1 – No Action There would be no direct or indirect effects to wolves if proposed actions were not implemented. Existing habitat conditions, prey base, and potential for wolf/human conflict would not change. Natural processes over the long term such as growth in vegetation would not affect wolf behavior or ability to survive. Therefore, taking no action would have no effect to gray wolf. 259 Final Environmental Impact Statement All Action Alternatives No den or rendezvous sites have been identified to date within or near the project area; therefore there would be no direct disturbance to wolves. Although the proposed activities would modify deer and elk habitat, this project would not affect deer or elk habitat substantially enough to influence changes in prey populations. Therefore, prey availability in the area is not expected to change as a result of the proposed activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Diversity of the Genus Psilocybe (Basidio- Mycotina, Agaricales, Strophariaceae) in the World Mycobiota, with Special At
    International]ournal ofi11edicinal J11ushrooms, Vol. 7, pp. 305-331 (2005) Species Diversity of the Genus Psilocybe (Basidio­ mycotina, Agaricales, Strophariaceae) in the World Mycobiota, with Special Attention to Hallucinogenic Properties Gastón Guzmán In~tituto de Ecología, Apartado Postal 63, Xalapa 91000, Veracruz, Mexico; [email protected] This article is dedícated to the outstanding mycologist, colleague, andfriend, Professor Shu-Ting Chang ABSTRACT: An exhaustive world revision of ali names considered in the genus Psilocybe s.l. is pre­ sented, of which the haliucinogenic species were treated with special emphasis. Seven hundred eighteen names related to Psilocybe were found reportcd in the bibliography, of which only 227 are accepted taxa in P;ilqcybe. The concept of the genu~ foUowed here is that of Guzmán 1983; th ~i:~fore Hypholo"!:ª' lVlelanótus, and Stropharza were excluded: Moreover, 53 spec1es of Psathyrella, m8.ny times related w1th Psilocybe, were also e..'Ccluded. The hallucinogenic species are 144, which are oistübuted m ali the coriti­ nents, of which Latín America (iiiduding the Caribbae), has the top, with more than 50 species. There are only 22 species in Canada and the US, while Mexico is the country with the higest number iri t he world, with 53 species. Europe has only 16 species, Asia 15, Africa 4, and Australia·and eastern islands 19. Sorne Psilocybe·species are common iii several countries or regions, as are P cubensis and P subcuben­ sis in ali the tropics; P coprophila in many temperate and tropical regions; P. argentina in several high ___ _111ountains or in tl:ie Austral anci .B_on;al_ regiQn§; anq fjin1etcy:ja and P semi/aneeata in Et!JOp_e, Carni,da, ----~~ -~--- e - .
    [Show full text]
  • Validation of Combinations with Basionyms Published by Fries in 1861
    ISSN (print) 0093-4666 © 2011. Mycotaxon, Ltd. ISSN (online) 2154-8889 CORE MYCOTAXONMetadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Institutional Research Information System Universityhttp://dx.doi.org/ of Turin 10.5248/118.455 Volume 118, pp. 455–458 October–December 2011 Validation of combinations with basionyms published by Fries in 1861 Scott A. Redhead1*, Joseph F. Ammirati2, Lorelei L. Norvell3, Alfredo Vizzini4 & Marco Contu5 1 National Mycological Herbarium, Eastern Cereal & Oilseed Research Centre C.E.F., Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0C6 2 Department of Biology, 351330, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA 3 Pacific Northwest Mycology Service, 6720 NW Skyline Boulevard, Portland, OR 97229-1309 USA 4 Dipartimento di Biologia Vegetale, Università degli Studi di Torino, Viale Mattioli 25, I-10125, Torino, Italy 5 Via Marmilla, 12 (I Gioielli 2), I-07026 Olbia (OT), Italy * Correspondence to: [email protected] Abstract — Authors (including some of us) have incorrectly cited as basionyms names treated by Fries in 1863 that were actually originally published by him in 1861. As these basionym citation errors mean that the intended new combinations are not validly published, the following combinations are again proposed as new: Chromosera cyanophylla, Mythicomyces corneipes, Tephrocybe misera, T. tesquorum. Three other intended combinations are noted as also not validly published, but the species are currently treated under the different (and validly published) names Haasiella venustissima, Phaeoclavulina curta, and Rhodonia placenta. Key words — Ceriporiopsis, Gerronema, Ramaria, International Code of Botanical Nomenclature Introduction Fries (1861) published a series of observations on new or little known hymenomycetes from Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • BULLETIN of the PUGET SOUND MYCOLOGICAL SOCIETY Number 431 April 2007
    BULLETIN OF THE PUGET SOUND MYCOLOGICAL SOCIETY Number 431 April 2007 AGARICUS MOELLERI: A New Name for an Old References Friend Brian Luther Freeman, Alice. 1979. “Agaricus in the Southeastern United States.” Mycotaxon, 8(1): 50–118. Years ago (early 1970s and before) we used to call our flat top Agaricus either Agaricus placomyces or A. meleagris. When Wasser, Solomon P. 1976. Novosti. Sist. Nizsh. Rast, 13:77. Alice Freeman (The Univ. of Tenn.) revised the genus in 1979, however, she determined that the flat top Agaricus from the SE US required a new name (= nomen novum), so she re-named it ODD MUSHROOM HABITATS Nick Iadanza A. praeclaresquamosus. This name has been in widespread use MushRumors, Oregon Myco. Soc., March/April 2007 ever since, appearing in numerous mushroom books, field guides, In fact-checking an article submitted to MushRumors, we ran across and the mycological literature. Alas, that name must now in turn information on some unusual microhabitats that are colonized by be changed. fungi. We’re all used to seeing the obvious mushrooms, but a closer According to the International Code of Botanical Nomencla- look at some interesting ecological niches can be rewarding. The ture—a sizable volume of rules, regulations, and recommendations next time you’re strolling through the woods, check out: that must be abided by for a botanical name to be valid—if an Sap: In coniferous forests, old deposits of hardened resin on earlier, validly published name for a species is confirmed to be standing trunks harbor a unique phylum of cup fungi, e.g., Reti- precisely that species, then the older name must be adopted and nocyclus.
    [Show full text]
  • Mushroomers Online! Homepage Welcome to "Mushroomers Online!" What Is "Mushroomers Online!"?
    Mushroomers Online! Homepage Welcome to "Mushroomers Online!" What is "Mushroomers Online!"? Mushroomers Online! is an annotated directory of mycophiles (mushroom enthusiasts) with access to the Internet. The listings are organized geographically. This resource is maintained as a public service by Dave Fischer, coauthor of Edible Wild Mushrooms of North America: A Field-to-Kitchen Guide and Mushrooms of Northeastern North America. This resource is intended to help individuals connect for the purpose of furthering their enjoyment of mushrooms and, hopefully, advance serious amateur study of fungi. It is not intended to serve as an index of mycological websites, whether educational, recreational, or commercial. The website administrator does not attempt to verify the information supplied by people who register for this directory, except that I do endeavor to qualify those who indicate themselves as "Qualified Experts" and to http://members.aol.com/basidium/mushpepl.html (1 of 4) [5/3/2004 9:37:40 PM] Mushroomers Online! Homepage spot-check listings for validity. If you wish to be listed in the directory, register now. Browse the Mushroomers Online! Directory This site maintained by David W. Fischer, whose e-mail address is [email protected] is part of Visitors to this page since 7 December 1997 Last updated on 2 November 1998 http://members.aol.com/basidium/mushpepl.html (2 of 4) [5/3/2004 9:37:40 PM] Mushroomers Online! Homepage (NOTE: MYKOWEB includes a directory of North American mushroom clubs) http://members.aol.com/basidium/mushpepl.html (3 of 4) [5/3/2004 9:37:40 PM] Mushroomers Online! Homepage Something really fun: Morchella ultima..
    [Show full text]
  • Species of Hypholoma (Fr.) P
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL INSTITUTO DE BIOCIÊNCIAS PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM BOTÂNICA DISSERTAÇÃO DE MESTRADO “ESPÉCIES DE HYPHOLOMA (FR.) P. KUMM. E STROPHARIA (FR.) QUÉL. (STROPHARIACEAE, AGARICALES) NO RIO GRANDE DO SUL, BRASIL” Vagner Gularte Cortez Orientadora: Profª. Drª. Rosa Mara Borges da Silveira Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil 2006 Vagner Gularte Cortez ESPÉCIES DE HYPHOLOMA (FR.) P. KUMM. E STROPHARIA (FR.) QUÉL. (STROPHARIACEAE, AGARICALES) NO RIO GRANDE DO SUL, BRASIL Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós- Graduação em Botânica, Área de Concentração em Taxonomia Vegetal (Ficologia e Micologia), da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), como requisito parcial para obtenção do grau de Mestre em Botânica. Orientadora: Profa. Dra. Rosa Mara Borges da Silveira Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil 2006 Agradecimentos A participação de inúmeras pessoas foi decisiva para a realização deste trabalho, portanto, é para mim um grande prazer poder agradecê-las nominalmente: A minha querida família, Cibéli, Elisa e Ísis de Moraes Cortez, a quem dedico com muito carinho este trabalho, pois para que ele fosse realizado, tiveram que suportar resignadamente a minha ausência por muitos dias ao longo destes últimos dois anos; Aos meus pais Mario e Nilza Cortez, pela ajuda de sempre e por acreditarem em mim, e também ao Nereu e Ceni Moraes, pelo apoio dispensado ao longo destes anos; Ao amigo e ex-orientador Gilberto Coelho meu sincero agradecimento por me conceder a oportunidade de adentrar no fascinante universo da Micologia e por todo seu incentivo e apoio neste e noutros trabalhos; Ao amigo e colega Edson Soares, por todos os momentos compartilhados (principalmente pelos bons), pelo convívio e pela amizade de todos estes anos; Aos “Mestres” João Fernando Prado (UFSM/UFRGS) e Thaís Scotti do Canto-Dorow (UFSM) por todo o estímulo e incentivo desde os primeiros passos no mundo da Botânica; A Profª.
    [Show full text]