sign in sign up
<<
Home , Amylocorticiales, Amylocorticium, Amyloxenasma, Anthracophyllum, Aphanobasidium, Athelia rolfsii

Mycologia, 102(4), 2010, pp. 865–880. DOI: 10.3852/09-288 # 2010 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897

Amylocorticiales ord. nov. and Jaapiales ord. nov.: Early diverging of dominated by corticioid forms

Manfred Binder1 of the remainder of the Agaricomyceti- Clark University, Biology Department, Lasry Center for dae, suggesting that the greatest radiation of pileate- Biosciences, 15 Maywood Street, Worcester, stipitate resulted from the elaboration of Massachusetts 01601 resupinate ancestors. Karl-Henrik Larsson Key words: morphological evolution, multigene Go¨teborg University, Department of Plant and datasets, rpb1 and rpb2 primers Environmental Sciences, Box 461, SE 405 30, Go¨teborg, Sweden INTRODUCTION P. Brandon Matheny The includes approximately 21 000 University of Tennessee, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 334 Hesler Biology Building, described (Kirk et al. 2008) that are domi- Knoxville, Tennessee 37996 nated by taxa with complex fruiting bodies, including agarics, , coral fungi and gasteromycetes. David S. Hibbett Intermixed with these forms are numerous lineages Clark University, Biology Department, Lasry Center for Biosciences, 15 Maywood Street, Worcester, of , which have inconspicuous, resu- Massachusetts 01601 pinate fruiting bodies (Binder et al. 2005; Larsson et al. 2004, Larsson 2007). No fewer than 13 of the 17 currently recognized orders of Agaricomycetes con- Abstract: The Agaricomycetidae is one of the most tain corticioid forms, and three, the Atheliales, morphologically diverse clades of that Corticiales, and Trechisporales, contain only corti- includes the well known and , cioid forms (Hibbett 2007, Hibbett et al. 2007). which are dominated by pileate-stipitate forms, and Larsson (2007) presented a preliminary classification the more obscure Atheliales, which is a relatively small in which corticioid forms are distributed across 41 group of resupinate taxa. This study focused families of Agaricomycetes. sampling on resupinate forms that may be related to The present study concerned corticioid lineages in these groups, aimed at resolving the early branching the Agaricomycetidae, which includes the Agaricales clades in the major groups of Agaricomycetidae. A and Boletales. The Agaricales is by far the largest specific goal was to resolve with confidence sister order of Agaricomycetes (ca. 13 000 described spe- group relationships among Agaricales, Boletales and cies) and contains roughly 85% pileate-stipitate Atheliales, a difficult task based on conflicting results species, while Boletales (ca. 1300 spp.) contains concerning the placement of the Atheliales. To this roughly 77% pileate-stipitate species. Early phyloge- end we developed a six-locus nuclear dataset (nuc-ssu, netic analyses of Agaricomycetes (Hibbett et al. 1997; nuc-lsu, 5.8S, rpb1, rpb2 and tef1) for 191 species, Moncalvo et al. 2000) demonstrated a sister group which was analyzed with maximum parsimony, max- relationship of Agaricales and Boletales and sug- imum likelihood and Bayesian methods. Our analyses gested that the common ancestor of the Agaricomy- of these data corroborated the view that the Boletales cetidae could have been pileate-stipitate (Binder and are closely related to athelioid forms. We also Hibbett 2002), but these studies did not sample identified an additional early branching within corticioid forms extensively. Among the first phylo- the Agaricomycetidae that is composed primarily of genetic studies to include corticioid taxa in Agarico- resupinate forms, as well as a few morphologically mycetidae were those of Bruns et al. (1998), which more elaborate forms including and suggested that Piloderma croceum might be closely . This clade, which we describe here as the related to the Agaricales, and Hibbett et al. (2000), new order , is the sister group of the which showed that Amphinema byssoides is closely Agaricales. We introduce a second order, the Jaa- related to the Boletales. As more sequences of piales, for the lone resupinate consisting corticioid forms were included in phylogenetic of two species only. The Jaapiales is supported as the studies it became apparent that several early diverging lineages in the Agaricomycetidae are largely com- Submitted 10 Nov 2009; accepted for publication 4 Dec 2009. posed of corticioid taxa, raising the possibility that the 1 Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] common ancestor of the group could have been

865 866 MYCOLOGIA corticioid. Multiple lineages of corticioid forms also referred to as sensu stricto, which is placed were found to be nested within the Agaricales, correctly in the Atheliales). Here we propose to call suggesting that there have been repeated reversals this clade the Amylocorticiales. Several studies have from complex forms to corticioid forms (Binder et al. suggested that the Amylocorticiales is in the Agarico- 2005; Hibbett 2004, Hibbett and Binder 2002; mycetidae, but its precise placement has not been well Larsson 2007). resolved. Analyses with nuc-lsu rRNA genes (alone or Approximately three groups of Agaricomycetidae as the dominant component of a supermatrix includ- contain corticioid forms and appear to be outside ing nuc-ssu, mt-lsu and mt-ssu rRNA genes) have both the Agaricales and Boletales. The smallest of placed the Amylocorticiales as the sister group of the these is the corticioid genus Jaapia, which we propose Agaricales or as the sister group of a clade containing to call the Jaapiales. Analyses of nuclear and Agaricales, Boletales and Atheliales (Binder et al. 2005, mitochondrial large and small subunit (nuc-lsu, nuc- Hibbett and Binder 2002; Larsson et al. 2004, Larsson ssu, mt-lsu, mt-ssu) rRNA genes (Binder et al. 2005) 2007). Analyses of a large dataset focused on Agaricales placed Jaapia as the sister group of the rest of the with nuc-lsu, nuc-ssu and 5.8S rRNA genes, and genes Agaricomycetidae, although analyses of the nuc-lsu that encode two subunits of RNA polymerase II (rpb1, rRNA alone (Larsson 2007) placed Jaapia as a close rpb2) suggested that the Amylocorticiales is the sister relative of the Gloeophyllales, Corticiales and Thele- group of the Agaricales, possibly along with a clade phorales. Jaapia includes two species, J. argillacea and containing certain clavarioid (, Clavulinopsis) J. ochroleuca, which produce thin, fully resupinate and pileate-stipitate agaricoid forms (Camarophyllop- fruiting bodies and function as saprotrophs. Camarophyllopsis) (Matheny et al. 2006). The second basal clade of corticioid forms in the The most taxonomically inclusive sampling of the Agaricomycetidae contains the Atheliales, which Amylocorticiales so far was by Niemela¨ et al. (2007), includes corticioid genera Amphinema, , Athe- who analyzed 15 species with nuc-lsu and 5.8S rRNA lopsis, Byssocorticium, Fibulorhizoctonia, Leptosporo- genes. Based on the work of Niemela¨ et al. and others myces, Piloderma and Tylospora (Binder and Hibbett (Binder et al. 2005, Hibbett and Binder 2002; Larsson 2006; Larsson et al. 2004, Larsson 2007) and a et al. 2004, Larsson 2007; Matheny et al. 2006), taxa recently proposed family, the Lepidostromataceae that could be members of the Amylocorticiales (containing three species in Lepidostroma), which is include corticioid (, Amylocorticiellum supported by nuc-lsu and nuc-ssu rRNA sequences as subillaqueatum and ), resupinate poroid the sister group of Atheliales (Ertz et al. 2008). ( and ), coralloid (Deflexula, Members of the Atheliales all have simple corticioid Lentaria), pileate (Plicapturopsis, Podoserpula) and fruiting bodies, while species in the Lepidostromata- even gasteroid taxa (Stephanospora). However there ceae have minute clavarioid fruiting bodies. Diverse has yet to be a multilocus analysis that combines all ecological strategies have evolved in the Atheliales- taxa reported to be members of the Amylocorticiales, Lepidostromataceae clade. Amphinema, Byssocorti- along with adequate representatives of the other cium, Piloderma and Tylospora spp. form ectomycor- clades of Agaricomycetidae, which makes it difficult to rhizal symbioses with Pinaceae and Fagaceae (Agerer assess the limits of the group. 1987–1998; Danielson and Pruden 1989; Erland and The Amylocorticiales, Jaapiales and Atheliales- Taylor 1999; Horton et al. 2005; Lilleskov et al. 2004), Lepidostromataceae clades are important for under- whereas Athelia and spp. are associated with standing the ancestral condition and early events in a white rot and degrade primarily decayed wood, the diversification of the Agaricomycetidae, which woody debris, mosses and leaf litter (Eriksson and includes more than half of all known Agaricomycetes. Ryvarden 1973; Lindsey and Gilbertson 1978). Some The goals of the present study were to address the Athelia species parasitize or function as higher-level relationships and limits of the basal symbionts of cyanobacteria (Gilbert 1988; Ju¨lich clades of Agaricomycetidae, with a focus on Amylo- 1978; Oberwinkler 1970; Yurchenko and Golubkov corticiales. We analyzed a six-gene dataset emphasiz- 2003), while Fibulorhizoctonia forms symbioses with ing taxa that have been reported to be members of termites that involve mimicry of termite eggs by Amylocorticiales and Atheliales, along with Agari- fungal sclerotia (Matsuura et al. 2000). Species of cales, Boletales, Jaapiales and other Agaricomycetes. Lepidostroma are basidiolichens (Ertz et al. 2008). We also compiled and analyzed a dataset containing The focus of this paper concerned the third all available nuc-lsu rRNA gene sequences of putative assemblage of basal Agaricomycetidae, which has Amylocorticiales. This study reports 386 new gene been referred to as the Amylocorticiaceae (Larsson sequences and includes formal taxonomic proposals 2007) or Atheliaceae pro parte (Matheny et al. 2006; for family Jaapiaceae fam. nov. and orders Amylocor- this is not the same group that Larsson [2007] ticiales ord. nov. and Jaapiales ord. nov. BINDER ET AL.: NEW ORDERS OF AGARICOMYCETIDAE 867

MATERIALS AND METHODS amplifications frequently resulted in more than one product. In this case the appropriate products were Fungal isolates and DNA extraction.—The 127 fungal identified on 2% TAE gels in comparison to a 1 kb DNA- isolates used in this study were obtained from the Forest ladder (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin), excised with sterile Products Laboratory (FPL, USDA Forest Service), where- spatulas and purified with the GeneClean II Kit. Multiple from voucher specimens are available, BCCM/MUCL PCR products that could not be separated by electrophor- (Belgium), or they were already at hand from our studies esis were cloned with TOPO TA (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, (Binder et al. 2005; Binder and Hibbett 2006; Matheny et al. California). The cleaned products were inserted into pCR 2006, 2007). Isolates were grown up to 4 wk under ambient 2.1-TOPO vectors and transformed with the One Shot conditions on solid media, including MEA (20 g malt competent cell kit (Invitrogen). The cells were plated and extract, 0.5 g yeast extract, 20 g agar) and modified vitamin incubated overnight on LB medium containing 50 mg/mL medium (4 g glucose, 1 g malt extract, 1 g ammonium kanamycin, which was saturated with 50 mL X-gal. Three tartrate, 0.2 g KH2PO4, 0.1 g MgSO4, 0.02 g NaCl, 0.026 g positive transformants each were analyzed directly using CaCl2, 0.88 mg ZnSO4, 0.81 mg MnSO4, 0.8 mg FeCl3,20g PCR with M13 forward and reverse primers. All PCR agar, 1 mL BME vitamins 1003 solutions from Sigma) based products were sequenced with BigDye 3.1 terminator on the original recipe by Fries (1978). sequencing chemistry (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Approximately 25 mg tissue was scraped from Petri dishes California) and run on an Applied Biosystems 3130 Genetic with sterile forceps and scalpels, transferred to precooled Analyzer. Contiguous sequences were assembled and edited mortars and ground with pestles to a fine powder with with Sequencher 4.8 (GeneCodes Corp., Ann Arbor, liquid nitrogen. The samples were transferred into 2 mL Michigan). Automated alignments generated by Clustal X reaction tubes and cell lysis proceeded 1 h at 65 C with the (Thompson et al. 1997) were manually adjusted in addition of 800 mL extraction buffer (50 mM EDTA, 50 mM MacClade 4.08 (Maddison and Maddison 2005). Tris-HCl, 3% SDS, pH 8). Cell debris, polysaccharides and proteins were separated from aqueous DNA portions Dataset assembly.—Three hundred eighty-six sequences through two purification steps with equal volumes of were newly generated for this study (TABLE I, SUPPLEMEN- phenol:chloroform (1:1) and chloroform:isomylalcohol TARY TABLES I–II), including 51 nuc-ssu, 63 nuc-lsu, 62 ITS, (24:1). Total DNA was precipitated with the addition of 59 rpb1,58rpb2 and 93 tef1 sequences. Initially the data 3 M sodium acetate (0.1 Vol.%) and isopropanol (0.54 were assembled separately by locus, complemented with Vol.%)at218 C. The DNA pellets were washed in 1 mL published sequences (Binder and Hibbett 2006; Garnica et 70% EtOH, air dried and resuspended in 100 mL sterile al. 2007; James et al. 2006; Matheny et al. 2006, 2007) and H2O. Crude extractions were purified with the GeneClean extended to 191 taxa. To assess topological congruence II Kit (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, California) before PCR preliminary single-locus bootstrap analyses were run in experiments. PAUP* 4.0b10 (Swofford 2002) under the maximum parsimony criterion and inspected for potential conflicts, PCR, primer design and sequencing.—Genes and products indicated by bootstrap support 70% and higher. Some amplified in this study were ribosomal nuc-ssu (amplified supported conflicts occurred, comparing trees inferred with primers PNS1–NS8), ribosomal nuc-lsu (LR0R–LR7), from rDNA and protein-coding genes, which were over- ITS (ITS1-F–ITS4), DNA-directed RNA polymerase II come largely by omitting all intron regions (1711 base pairs subunit one rpb1 (Af–Cr), DNA-directed RNA polymerase [bp]) except the 59 end of intron 2 in rpb1. Systematic II subunit two rpb2 (fRPB2-5F–bRPB2-7.1R and bRPB2- errors were minimized further by contrasting parsimony 6.9F–bRPB2-11R1) and translation elongation factor 1- bootstrapped trees inferred from alignments with and alpha tef1 (EF1-983F–EF1-2218R). The specifications and without third-codon positions, which are prone to satura- sequences for these primers have been published (Gardes tion (Matheny et al. 2007). The direct comparison indicated and Bruns 1993; Matheny et al. 2002, 2006; Matheny 2005; that the exclusion of 1331 third-codon positions enhanced Rehner and Buckley 2005; Vilgalys and Hester 1990; White the phylogenetic signal and support values in general. et al. 1990; http://faculty.washington.edu/benhall/). In Seven data partitions were imposed on the dataset, addition we designed three new primers for rpb1 and one comprising combined rDNA loci and protein-coding genes new primer for rpb2 more specific to Agaricomycetidae with by divided first and second positions, and the optimal 3 an in silico approach with Amplify 3 3.1.4 (http://engels. models for each were estimated with Modeltest 3.06 (Posada 9 genetics.wisc.edu/amplify/). These were rpb1:aAf (5 - and Crandall 2001). GAGTGTCCGGGGCATTTYGG), i2.2F (59-CGTTTTCGR TCGCTTGAT), aCr (59-ARAARTCBACHCGYTTBCCCAT) Phylogenetic analyses.—All analyses were performed on a and rpb2:a-8.0R(59-TCTCKGAAYTTVAGRTAYTCCAT). Linux Pro 9.2 Opteron AMD 246 cluster (Microway, The new oligonucleotides were used in PCR and sequen- Plymouth, Massachusetts). We inferred phylogenetic trees cing experiments. based on the combined six-gene dataset with MrBayes 3.1.2 A standardized PCR program (initial denaturation 95 C (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003) and RAxML 7.0.4 for 2 min, denaturation 94 C for 45 s, annealing 50 C for (Stamatakis 2006). The general time reversible model 1 min 10 s, extension 72 C for 2 min, 34 cycles) with (GTR), using proportion of invariant sites and distribution prolonged extension times was chosen for all loci except of rates at variable sites modeled on a discrete gamma tef1, for which the original protocol designed by Rehner distribution with four rate classes, was estimated as the best- and Buckley (2005) was found to be superior. rpb1 and rpb2 fit likelihood model for all partitions. Bayesian analyses used 6 M 868

TABLE I. Species list of Amylocorticiales, Atheliales, Jaapiales, resupinate Boletales and resupinate Agaricales used in this study and GenBank entries. Accession numbers for newly generated sequences are highlighted in boldface. See SUPPLEMENTARY TABLES I AND II for a complete list of isolates and GenBank accessions

GenBank accession numbers Species Isolate ID ITS, 5.8S nuc-lsu nuc-ssu rpb1 rpb2 tef1

Agaricales Aphanobasidium pseudotsugae HHB-822 GU187509 GU187567 GU187620 GU187455 GU187781 GU187695 Cristinia rhenana 344311 GU187496 GU187663 ———— Cristinia sp. FP-100305 GU187526 GU187585 GU187637 GU187470 GU187793 GU187718 Amylocorticiales Amyloathelia crassiuscula GB/K169-796 DQ144610 DQ144610 — — — — Amylocorticium cebennense HHB-2808 GU187505 GU187561 GU187612 GU187439 GU187770 GU187675 Amylocorticium subincarnatum AS_95 AY463377 AY586628 — — — — Amylocorticium subsulphureum HHB-13817 GU187506 GU187562 GU187617 GU187443 GU187773 GU187680 allantosporum KHL s. n. GU187498 GU187666 ———— Anomoloma myceliosum MJL-4413 GU187500 GU187559 GU187614 GU187441 GU187766 GU187677 Anomoloma albolutescens L-6088 GU187507 GU187563 GU187618 GU187438 GU187768 GU187671 Anomoporia bombycina L-6240 GU187508 GU187564 GU187611 — GU187765 GU187674 YCOLOGIA KHL11072 AY463379 AY586630 — — — — AFTOL-664 DQ484061 AY635773 AY665774 — GU187821 GU187681 Ceraceomyces tessulatus KHL8474 AY463391 AY586642 — — — — subillaqueatum KHL8493 AY463431 AY586679 — — — — JS16122 GU187497 GU187664 ———— septentrionalis Plicaturopsis crispa AFTOL-1924 DQ494686 DQ470820 AY293148 — GU187816 — AFTOL-1522 DQ494688 DQ470821 — — GU187804 — Serpulomyces borealis L-8014 GU187512 GU187570 GU187624 GU187446 GU187782 GU187686 Atheliales Amphinema byssoides EL11_98 GQ162810 GQ162810 — — — — Athelia arachnoidea CBS418.72 GU187504 GU187557 GU187616 GU187436 GU187769 GU187672 Athelia epiphylla FP-100564 GU187501 GU187558 GU187613 GU187440 GU187771 GU187676 Athelia sp. FP-133442 GU187503 GU187560 GU187615 GU187442 GU187772 GU187679 Athelia sp. L-10567 GU187537 GU187592 GU187645 GU187477 GU187802 GU187739 Athelia sp. HHB-15599 GU187502 GU187565 GU187619 GU187437 GU187767 GU187678 Athelopsis glaucina KHL11901 GU187495 GU187662 ———— Athelopsis subinconspicua KHL8490 AY463383 AY586634 — — — — Fibulorhizoctonia sp. AFTOL-576 AY854062 AY635779 AY654887 AY857985 AY885161 AY879115 Leptosporomyces raunkiaerii HHB-7628 GU187528 GU187588 GU187640 GU187471 GU187791 GU187719 Piloderma fallax S-12 GU187535 GU187591 GU187644 pseudogene GU187797 GU187738 Piloderma byssinum KHL8501 DQ469282 DQ469282 — — — — Piloderma lanatum JS24861 AY463454 AY586700 — — — — TABLE I. Continued

GenBank accession numbers

Species Isolate ID ITS, 5.8S nuc-lsu nuc-ssu rpb1 rpb2 tef1

Boletales arida FP-104367 GU187510 GU187573 GU187622 GU187445 GU187775 GU187684 Coniophora arida v. suffocata MUCL30844 GU187511 GU187568 GU187623 GU187457 GU187779 GU187685 Coniophora cerebella HK‘8’ GU187513 GU187569 GU187625 GU187447 GU187776 GU187687 Coniophora marmorata MUCL31667 GU187515 GU187571 GU187626 GU187448 GU187780 GU187688 Coniophora olivacea FP-104386 GU187516 GU187572 GU187627 GU187452 — GU187689 B

Coniophora prasinoides FP-105969 GU187519 GU187576 GU187621 GU187450 GU187785 GU187691 AL ET INDER Coniophora puteana MUCL1000 GU187521 GU187578 GU187631 GU187451 GU187778 GU187693 Coniophora sp. Braz-6 GU187517 GU187575 GU187628 GU187458 GU187784 GU187697 Gyrodontium sacchari MUCL40589 GU187522 GU187579 GU187632 GU187460 GU187764 GU187703 Hydnomerulius pinastri MD-312 GU187523 GU187580 GU187633 GU187462 GU187787 GU187708 arizonica RLG-9902 GU187527 GU187582 GU187636 GU187466 GU187792 — N .:

Leucogyrophana lichenicola DAOM194172 GU187531 GU187583 GU187638 GU187467 GU187789 GU187715 OF ORDERS EW L-10277 GU187525 GU187584 GU187634 GU187468 GU187817 — Leucogyrophana montana 2998a — GU187665 ———— Leucogyrophana olivascens HHB-11134 GU187532 GU187587 GU187639 GU187469 GU187790 GU187717 Leucogyrophana romellii T-547 GU187529 GU187586 GU187635 GU187465 GU187794 GU187720 Pseudomerulius aureus FP-103859 GU187534 GU187590 GU187643 GU187474 GU187799 GU187731

Pseudomerulius curtisii REH8912 GU187533 GU187589 GU187641 GU187472 GU187796 GU187725 A GARICOMYCETIDAE lacrymans REG 383 GU187542 GU187596 GU187649 GU187485 GU187809 GU187752 MUCL30528 GU187545 GU187600 GU187651 GU187480 GU187808 GU187748 Serpula himantioides RLG-12941 GU187547 GU187602 GU187654 GU187484 GU187811 GU187750 Serpula incrassata DAOM170590 GU187541 GU187595 GU187652 GU187481 — GU187751 Serpula similis MUCL43280 GU187546 GU187601 GU187653 GU187486 GU187812 GU187724 Serpula tignicola CBS311.54 GU187543 GU187597 GU187650 GU187487 — GU187753 Jaapiales Jaapia argillacea CBS252.74 GU187524 GU187581 AF518581 GU187463 GU187788 GU187711 869 870 MYCOLOGIA the GTR model with the substitution rate matrix, transi- overlap with the second product b6.9F–b11R1, a total tion/transversion rate ratio, character state frequencies, overlap of 286 bp. The a-8.0R oligonucleotide gamma shape parameter a and proportion of invariant sites performed as effectively as b7.1R. in each partition calculated independently. Posterior probabilities (PP) were drawn from two runs employing Phylogenetic analyses of the six-gene dataset.—The final four Metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo ana- concatenated dataset had a length of 6095 aligned lyses over 15 000 000 generations each, sampling trees every nucleotide positions after pruning and had an overall 1000th generation. The final burn-in of trees that were not completeness of approximately 91%. The six-gene accounted for computing the 50% majority rule consensus dataset and the unshortened single-gene matrices tree was determined with Tracer 1.4 (Rambaut and have been deposited in TreeBase (S2565), including Drummond 2007, http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer). Max- imum likelihood (ML) searches conducted with RAxML 5.8S (99% complete, 161 positions), nuc-lsu (100%, involved 1000 replicates under the GTRGAMMA model, 1583), nuc-ssu (95%, 1841), rpb1 (84%, 2058), rpb2 with all model parameters estimated by the program. The (86%, 2472) and tef1 (82%, 1022). In the searches tree with the best likelihood value served as the starting tree with RAxML the six-gene alignment had 4034 distinct for the Bayesian analyses. In addition 1000 rapid bootstrap patterns with a proportion of gaps and undetermined (ML BS) replicates were run with the GTRCAT model. characters of 0.202. Partitioned ML analyses resulted Results from preliminary analyses provided evidence that in a best scoring tree with a likelihood of 2ln 5 the Amylocorticiales consists of a morphologically diverse 239802.52. In addition ML bootstrap analyses were group of species that may be underrepresented in the six- run separately to estimate the support values in gene analyses. To obtain all available Amylocorticiales nuc- RAxML. We used Tracer 1.4 to inspect the log files lsu rRNA sequences BLASTN analyses (Altschul et al. 1997) generated in Bayesian analyses, confirming that the were conducted. The query sequences at hand were aligned estimated sample sizes for statistics represent appro- to the best hits scored in GenBank with MacClade and Jaapia species were included as outgroups. The nuc-lsu priate values of posterior distributions. The two dataset was submitted to the RAxML Blackbox server Bayesian runs converged to stable likelihood values (Stamatakis et al. 2008) to calculate ML BS support. (2ln 235243.01–2ln 235178.03) after 9 000 000 gen- Parsimony BS analyses were performed locally with 1000 erations and 6000 stationary trees from each analysis replicates in PAUP*, all characters equally weighted, one were used to compute a 50% majority rule consensus random taxon addition sequence and tree bisection tree in PAUP* to calculate posterior probabilities. reconnection (TBR) branch swapping. Heuristic parsimony The analyses are summarized (FIG. 1), highlighting searches used the same protocol, but keeping only two trees ML BS values up to 70% and strong Bayesian per replicate. The resulting optimal trees were subjected to posterior probability values (PP 5 1.0) for the focal TBR branch swapping limiting MAXTREES to 1000. groups.

RESULTS Phylogenetic analyses of the nuc-lsu Amylocorticiales dataset.—The nuc-lsu dataset included 1422 posi- Efficiency of new Agaricomycetidae rpb1 and rpb2 tions; 1049 characters were constant and 250 char- primers.—The new primers in this study, which were acters were parsimony informative. Heuristic searches designed as more specific alternatives to existing resulted in 18 equally parsimonious trees with a primers, yielded variable success rates. The rpb1 length of 829 steps (CI 5 0.56, RI 5 0.75), one of primers aAf and aCr performed not as well as the which is provided (FIG. 2). Support values for the pair Af–Cr. Combinations of both (aAf–Cr and Af–aCr) Amylocorticiales are high (BS, ML BS 5 100), but the proved to be more efficient and increased the PCR backbone structure of the clade is not well supported. success rate by roughly 25% compared to Af–Cr. The Nevertheless 13 nodes receive bootstrap support of at hybridization site of aAf is identical to the one of Af, least 94% (in either parsimony or ML bootstrap), while aCr binds 92 bp downstream of Cr. The third including six that group multiple species: (i) Anom- rpb1 oligonucleotide, i2.2F, binds to a conserved site oloma spp.; (ii) Plicaturopsis crispa and in intron 2 (338–355 bp downstream of Af) and is pendulus; (iii) Amylocorticiellum subillaqueatum and highly efficient as a sequencing primer. In addition Podoserpula pusio;(iv)Amylocorticium spp.; (v) i2.2F turned out to be an excellent PCR primer when Athelopsis lacerata, Amyloxenasma allantosporum and paired with Cr. The resulting PCR product is Phlebiella sp.; and (vi) Anomoporia bombycina and A. approximately 500 bp shorter than the 1380 bp Af– vesiculosa (but not Anomoporia kamtschatica). Nine Cr product. species in the Amylocorticiales nuc-lsu rRNA dataset The rpb2 target region 5F–11R1 requires two PCR were represented by multiple accessions. Most of and averages 2215 bp. The new primer a-8.0R was these were grouped with strong support, but two designed as an alternative to b7.1R for use with f5F to species, Anomoloma myceliosa and Amylocorticium amplify a product that provides 111 bp additional cebennense, were not resolved as monophyletic, and BINDER ET AL.: NEW ORDERS OF AGARICOMYCETIDAE 871 two groups of species, Anomoloma albolutescens and A. smooth, thin-walled or thick-walled, ellipsoid, cylind- flavissimum,andAnomoporia bombycina and A. rical or allantoid, in most species amyloid. Species live vesiculosa, could not be distinguished based on nuc- saprophytically on decaying wood or as plant parasites. lsu rRNA sequences (FIG. 2). Associated with brown rot or white rot.

TAXONOMY Exemplar genera: Amylocorticium, Anomoporia Pouzar 1966, Irpicodon Pouzar 1966, Podoserpula D.A. Reid Jaapiaceae Manfr. Binder, K.H. Larss. & Hibbett fam. 1963, Serpulomyces (Zmitr.) Zmitr. 2002. nov. MycoBank MB515501 Basidiomata resupinata. Hymenophora laevia, tenuia, por- DISCUSSION osa. Systema hypharum monomiticum; hyphae fibulatae. This study represents the most intensive analysis of Cystidia semper praesentia. Basidia clavata, tetraspora. Basi- diosporae laeves, fusiformes, maturitate crassitunicatae, cya- the ‘‘basal’’ lineages of Agaricomycetidae to date, and nophilae. Fungi lignicolae. it resolves some conflicts arising from studies with more limited sampling of genes or taxa in the Amylocorticiales, Atheliales and Jaapiales (Binder et Typus: Jaapia Bres., Ann Mycol 9:428. 1911 al. 2005, Larsson 2007, Larsson et al. 2004, Matheny et Basidiomycetes with effused basidiomata. Hymeno- al. 2006). The Agaricomycetidae is resolved as phore smooth, very thin, and porous. Hyphal system monophyletic in all six-gene analyses and receives monomitic and all hyphae nodose-septate. Cystidia high support values (ML BS 5 99%,PP5 1.0; FIG. 1). always present, long and strongly projecting. Basidia Strongly supported clades within the Agaricomyceti- clavate, producing four . smooth, dae include the Amylocorticiales (74%, 1.0), Athe- fusiform, at maturity thick-walled and strongly cyano- liales (100%, 1.0), Boletales (100%, 1.0) and Agar- philous. Living on decaying wood. icales (89%, 1.0). The sister group relationship of the Agaricomycetidae with the lone genus Jaapia has Exemplar genus: Jaapia. been seen in previous analyses with rRNA genes Jaapiales Manfr. Binder, K.H. Larss. & Hibbett, ord. (Hibbett and Binder 2002), but here it receives nov. moderately strong support (71%, 1.0) for the first MycoBank MB515500 time. Other strongly supported sister group relation- Descriptio ordinis eadem est ac descriptio familiae. ships include the Amylocorticiales-Agaricales clade (90%, 1.0) and the Atheliales-Boletales clade (88%, 1.0). Typus: Jaapia Bres., Ann Mycol 9:428. 1911 Amylocorticiales K.H. Larss., Manfr. Binder & Hib- Amylocorticiales.—The Amylocorticiales contains mostly bett, ord. nov. resupinate forms that have been referred to genera MycoBank MB515502 Anomoporia, Amyloathelia, Amylocorticiellum, Amylocor- Basidiomata resupinata, effuso-reflexa vel stipitata. Hy- ticium, Amyloxenasma, Anomoloma, Athelia, Athelopsis, menophora laevia, merulioidea, irpicoidea vel poroidea. Ceraceomyces, Hypochniciellum, Leptosporomyces and Systema hypharum monomiticum; hyphae fibulatae. Cysti- Serpulomyces (FIG. 2). Several of these taxa appear to dia interdum praesentia. Basidia terminalia vel raro be non-monophyletic. Genera that are resolved as lateralia, tetraspora. Basidiosporae laeves, ellipsoideae, having multiple lineages within the Amylocorticiales cylindricae vel allantoideae, tenuitunicatae vel crassitunica- based on the nuc-lsu rRNA analyses include Anom- tae, saepe amyloideae. Fungi lignicolae vel in plantis variis oporia, Ceraceomyces and Hypochniciellum. Genera that parasitici. Lignum decompositum brunneum vel album. include isolates that have been placed (by this or other studies; Binder et al. 2005, Larsson et al. 2006, Matheny Typus: Amylocorticium Pouzar, Cesk Mykol 13:11. et al. 2006) outside Amylocorticiales include Athelia 1959 (also resolved in Atheliales), Hypochniciellum (Agar- Basidiomycetes with effused, effused-reflexed to icales) and Ceraceomyces (). Some of these almost pileate, or stipitate basidiomata. Hymenophore placements might be due to misidentifications, which smooth, merulioid, irpicoid or poroid. Hyphal system are particularly likely with corticioid forms (Binder et monomitic and all hyphae nodose-septate. Cystidia are al. 2005). Alternative generic classifications that could rare and when present, tube-like and often nodose- resolve some of the conflicts between phylogeny and septate. Basidia are mostly terminal but in one genus have been proposed for several of the born laterally on horizontal hyphae (pleurobasidia), species analyzed here, including Amylocorticiellum invariably producing four spores. Basidiospores subillaqueatum (for Hypochniciellum subillaqueatum) 872 MYCOLOGIA

FIG. 1. Phylogenetic relationships of Agaricomycetidae inferred from nuc-ssu, nuc-lsu, and 5.8S rRNA, rpb1, rpb2 and tef1 genes. Topology, branch lengths and bootstrap values above branches are from RAxML analyses excluding third base positions in protein-coding genes. Thickened branches indicate Bayesian posterior probability 5 1.0. Resupinate species are highlighted in boldface. Abbreviations in Amylocorticiales and Atheliales clades: BR (brown rot), ECM (ectomycorrhizal), PLP (plant pathogen), TES (termite symbionts). and Serpulomyces borealis (for Ceraceomyces borealis) diversification within the Amylocorticiales. Nonresu- (Zmitrovich and Spirin 2002). A genus-level revision of pinate members of the clade include the ‘‘pagoda the Amylocorticiales is needed, but that will require ’’, Podoserpula pusio (FIG. 3D), which has a multilocus data and additional isolates for many of the multitiered pileate-stipitate form, and the sister taxa problematical taxa. Analyses of internal transcribed Plicaturopsis crispa and Irpicodon pendulus (FIG. 3G), spacers of nuc rRNA genes could be useful in which are pileate-sessile (FIGS. 1, 2). Podosperula and addressing possible synonymies in the Anomoporia Plicaturopsis both have merulioid hymenophores; bombycina/vesiculosa group and the Anomoloma albo- Irpicodon has an irregularly hydnoid hymenophore, lutescens/flavissium group (FIGS. 2; 3A–C, E, F). and Anomoporia and Anomoloma have poroid hyme- Although it is characterized by resupinate forms, nophores. The inclusion of these morphologically there actually has been considerable morphological divergent forms in an otherwise corticioid clade is BINDER ET AL.: NEW ORDERS OF AGARICOMYCETIDAE 873

FIG. 1. Continued. 874 MYCOLOGIA

FIG. 2. Phylogenetic relationships of Amylocorticiales inferred from nuc-lsu rRNA gene sequences. One of 18 equally parsimonious trees. Support values above branches are from maximum parsimony bootstrap searches, and values below branches are from rapid bootstrap analyses with RAxML. Strain numbers are provided for species for which sequencing data were generated in this study. surprising, but except for Irpicodon they all are Amylocorticiales and is a widespread phenomenon in represented by multiple accessions in the nuc-lsu both and Agaricales. rRNA dataset (FIG. 2), suggesting that misidentifica- All species in Amylocorticiales have a monomitic tions are not a source of error. An amyloid reaction of hyphal system with clamped hyphae and a thickening the wall is present in most Amylocorti- . In typical cases the corticioid taxa develop ciales species but lacking in Ceraceomyces, Podoserpula, hymenium over a subiculum of rather loosely inter- Serpulomyces and Leptosporomyces septentrionalis.To woven hyphae to create a membranaceous fruiting our knowledge amyloidity is not reported for body structure. There is a tendency for the most basal Athelia rolfsii. Amyloidity of spores is not unique to hyphae in the subiculum to be distinctly wider than in BINDER ET AL.: NEW ORDERS OF AGARICOMYCETIDAE 875 the subhymenium. Good examples of this fruiting Agaricales.—The limits of the Amylocorticiales and body construction are seen in Ceraceomyces tessulatus, Agaricales were poorly resolved in Binder et al. (2005) S. borealis and Hypochniciellum molle. This type of and Matheny et al. (2006). The analyses presented structure is not unique for species in Amylocorticiales here suggest that several lineages that previously have and is not present in all species. The fruiting body been placed as close relatives of the Amylocorticiales texture of Amyloxenasma species differs in that they actually represent multiple lineages within the Agar- have a dense hyphal system with narrow, contorted icales. One such lineage is the group containing the and mostly indistinct hyphae in a subgelatinous coralloid Clavaria zollingeri and Clavulinopsis laeticor matrix. Basidiospores are invariably smooth, allan- and the agaricoid Camarophyllopsis hymenocephala, toid, cylindrical or ellipsoid with thin to thickened which Matheny et al. (2006) called the Clavariaceae. spore walls. Cystidia are not common and when Matheny et al. included these taxa in a large dataset present simple, tube-like and sometimes septate. containing rpb1, rpb2, nuc-ssu, nuc-lsu and 5.8S rRNA Other kinds of differentiated vegetative organs are genes that was focused on Agaricales (Boletales and lacking, but sclerotia are present in A. rolfsii. Conidia Atheliales also were included). Depending on the are documented only for Amylocorticiellum subilla- analytical method, the Clavariaceae was placed as the queatum, which has small cylindrical conidia formed sister group of the Amylocorticiales (in Bayesian on short subulate outgrowths from vegetative hyphae. analyses) or was nested within the Agaricales (parsi- The most parsimonious ancestral state reconstruc- mony). The Amylocorticiales-Clavariaceae group was tion (ASR) of fruiting body forms in Amylocorticiales, referred to as the plicaturopsidoid clade, one of six based on either the nuc-lsu rRNA tree or the six-gene major clades of Agaricales. The six-gene analyses tree (FIGS. 1, 2), suggests that the plesiomorphic presented here add tef1 to the set of loci analyzed by fruiting body form of the Amylocorticiales is resupi- Matheny et al. (2006) and include all three species of nate with a smooth hymenophore. ASR can be Clavariaceae sampled by Matheny et al. plus Camar- sensitive to analytical method and taxon sampling, ophyllopsis schultzeri and the coralloid Ramariopsis so this inference should be viewed with caution. kunzei. In the optimal maximum likelihood tree Nevertheless the simplest interpretation of morpho- (FIG. 1) the Clavariaceae form a strongly supported logical evolution suggests there have been indepen- (ML BS 5 100%,PP5 1.0) clade that is resolved as dent gains of pileate-stipitate and pileate-sessile the sister group of the remainder of the Agaricales. forms, as well as hydnoid, merulioid and poroid This placement is weakly supported however as are all hymenophores within the Amylocorticiales. of the deepest nodes comprising the backbone of the Most species of the Amylocorticiales are thought to Agaricales. Of the six major clades of Agaricales be saprotrophic and occur on wood at various stages resolved by Matheny et al. (2006) two are resolved as of decay. There is diversity in the mode of decay monophyletic (the agaricoid and tricholomatoid however. Species of Anomoloma produce a white rot, clades) with only the tricholomatoid clade receiving and on that basis the genus was segregated from significant support (ML BS 5 74%,PP5 1.0). The Anomoporia, which includes species that are asso- pluteoid clade is monophyletic, pending exclusion of ciated with brown rot (Niemela¨ et al. 2007). Informa- the Pleurotaceae, and the hygrophoroid clade is tion about decay type among other members of the monophyletic with the exclusion of the . Amylocorticiales is fragmentary; Amylocorticium spp. Binder et al. (2005) performed analyses of a are reported to produce a brown rot, P. crispa supermatrix containing mostly nuc-lsu rRNA genes, produces a white rot and S. borealis is reported to along with nuc-ssu, mt-lsu and mt-ssu rRNA genes. produce either a white rot or brown rot (Ginns 1976, Two members of the Amylocorticiales, Plicaturopsis Ginns and Lefebvre 1993). Biotrophic nutritional crispa and Phlebiella sp., were grouped in a weakly modes also occur in the Amylocorticiales. Athelia supported clade containing three members of the rolfsii ( rolfsii) is a soilborne plant pathogen Atheliales (labeled as the athelioid clade) and a that attacks turf grasses and other herbaceous hosts heterogeneous assemblage of coralloid (Lentaria (Ginns and Lefebvre 1993). Niemela¨ et al. (2007) albovinacea), corticioid (Radulomyces molaris), hyd- suggested that Anomoloma flavissimum might be noid (Deflexula subsimplex) and gasteroid (Stephanos- ectomycorrhizal because the fruiting bodies seem to Stephanospora caroticolor) forms. Lentaria albovinacea arise from the ground and rhizomorphs are observed was not included in the six-gene analyses in the in soil and debris, but they also noted that the wood present study, but it was included in an analysis of underlying fruiting bodies had white rot. Similarly P. rpb1 and nuc-lsu rRNA genes focused on Agaricales pusio grows on old rotten stumps or in litter on the (Garnica et al. 2007), in which it was placed with weak ground next to old stumps and could be a saprotroph support (bootstrap , 50%,PP5 0.85) as the sister or ectomycorrhizal (Bougher and Syme 1998). group of chrysodon. Garnica et al. (2007) 876 MYCOLOGIA

FIG. 3. Representatives of Amylocorticiales and Jaapiales. A. Anomoporia vesiculosa (picture by Yu-Cheng Dai) Changbaishan Nat. Res., Lilin Prov., China. B. Anomoloma myceliosum (by Yu-Cheng Dai) Changbaishan Nat. Res., Lilin Prov., China. C. Anomoporia bombycina (by Yu-Cheng Dai) Jiuzhai Nat. Res., Sichuan Prov., China. D. Podoserpula pusio (by Kevin Thiele and Tom May), Jensens Creek at Malinns, Bonang Road, Victoria, Australia. E. Anomoloma flavissimum (by Yu- BINDER ET AL.: NEW ORDERS OF AGARICOMYCETIDAE 877 did not include any members of the Amylocorticiales, relationship. Even with more than 6 kilobases of data but parsimony and maximum likelihood analyses of a however the deepest divergences within the Atheliales nuc-lsu rRNA dataset including Amylocorticiales and are not resolved with confidence. This lack of relevant Agaricales are consistent with the placement resolution makes it difficult to infer patterns of of L. albovinacea close to or nested within the evolution in nutritional modes in Atheliales, which (Binder and Hibbett unpubl). How- includes a remarkable diversity of ectomycorrhizal ever the genus Lentaria is polyphyletic with Lentaria species, saprotrophs, termite symbionts, para- michneri, L. pinicola and L. dendroidea having been sites and cyanobacterial symbionts (Agerer 1987– shown to be in the , Phallomycetidae 1998; Danielson and Pruden 1989; Eriksson and (Binder et al. 2005, Hosaka et al. 2006; Larsson 2007). Ryvarden 1973; Erland and Taylor 1999; Gilbert Radulomyces and Deflexula are members of the 1988; Horton et al. 2005; Ju¨lich 1978; Lilleskov et al. Pterulaceae, a family placed by Matheny et al. (2006) 2004; Lindsey and Gilbertson 1978; Matsuura et al. in the hygrophoroid clade of the Agaricales. Mun- 2000; Munkacsi et al. 2004; Oberwinkler 1970; kacsi et al. (2004) showed that the Pterulaceae Yurchenko and Golubkov 2003). Moreover this study includes the coralloid genus Pterula and fungal did not sample all taxa of Atheliales (missing taxa cultivars of the Neotropical ant Apterostigma pilosum, include the ectomycorrhizal Tylospora asterophora and and Larsson (2007) suggested that the Pterulaceae Byssocorticium pulchrum) or its apparent sister group, also includes the corticioid genera Aphanobasidium, the lichen-forming Lepidostromataceae (Ertz et al. Coronicium and Merulicium. The six-gene analysis 2008). presented here found strong support (ML BS 5 99%, The suborders and unplaced families within the PP 5 1.0) for a Pterulaceae clade containing Pterula Boletales recognized in Binder and Hibbett (2006) echo, Radulomyces rickii, Coronicium alboglaucum and using atp6, mt-lsu, nuc-lsu, nuc-ssu and 5.8S rRNA Aphanobasidium pseudotsugae. The agaricoid wood genes, are all strongly supported in the present study decayer Phyllotopsis nidulans was placed in the (FIG. 1). Several higher-level groupings that were not Pterulaceae by Matheny et al. (2006), but the present resolved previously (or that were not robust) receive analyses suggest (with weak support) that it is related strong support here, including a clade uniting the to Pleurocybella porrigens and Phyllotopsis sp., which (including ‘‘Paxillineae’’) and Scleroder- are also agaricoid wood decayers. matineae (ML BS 5 99%,PP5 1.0) and another Stephanospora caroticolor is a hypogeous gasteromy- clade uniting the Tapinellineae and (ML cete that has anatomical similarities to the corticioid BS 5 90%,PP5 1.0). The latter appears to be the species Lindtneria trachyspora. Larsson (2007) showed sister group of the remainder of the Boletales (ML BS that Lindtneria and the corticioid taxa Cristinia 5 75%,PP5 1.0). The Boletales is morphologically helvetica and Athelidium aurantiacum form a clade, diverse, containing pileate-stipitate forms with tubular which he called the Stephanosporaceae. The present or lamellate hymenophores, resupinate and effused- analysis strongly supports (ML BS 5 100%,PP5 1.0) reflexed forms and gasteromycetes. The typical the monophyly of the Stephanosporaceae, repre- boletoid fruiting body form (pileate-stipitate with a sented by S. caroticolor, Cristinia rhenana and tubular hymenophore) is restricted to the strongly Cristinia sp. (FIG. 1). The Stephanosporaceae is supported (ML BS 5 99%,PP51.0) Boletineae/ strongly supported (ML BS 5 97%,PP5 1.0) as the Sclerodermatineae/Suillineae clade and may be a sister group of the Pterulaceae in the six-gene analysis synapomorphy of that group. Resupinate to effused- (FIG. 1). The same relationship was recovered by reflexed wood decayers occur throughout the Tapi- Larsson (2007) based on nuc-lsu rRNA sequences but nellineae, Coniophorineae, Serpulaceae and Hygro- with weak support. phoropsidaceae (including Leucogyrophana, which is Atheliales-Boletales clade.—The results of the six-gene polyphyletic, Coniophora,andSerpula), which is analyses presented here are consistent with Binder consistent with the view that resupinate forms and and Hibbett (2006), Larsson et al. (2004) and Larsson saprotrophic living strategies could be plesiomorphic (2007) with regard to the composition of the in both Boletales (Binder and Hibbett 2006) and Atheliales and Boletales and their sister group Atheliales. r

Cheng Dai) Fenglin Nat. Res., Heilongjiang Prov. China. F. Anomoloma albolutescens (by Yu-Cheng Dai) Changbaishan Nat. Res., Lilin Prov., China. G. Irpicodon pendulus (by Olli Manninen), Tyresta National Park, Sweden. H. Jaapia ochroleuca (by Kilian Mu¨hlebach), Dalpe Ti Pian di mezzo, Switzerland. 878 MYCOLOGIA

Conclusions.—The Agaricales and Boletales, two phylogenetic relationships, but it did not include large clades of mostly pileate-stipitate forms that formal analyses that could detect shifts in diversifica- containmorethanhalfoftheknownspeciesof tion rates (Maddison et al. 2007) or address their Agaricomycetes, are nested within a paraphyletic causes. Such analyses are under way and will be assemblage of three relatively small clades containing reported elsewhere. mostly resupinate forms. One of these is the newly recognized Amylocorticiales. Although it is a small ACKNOWLEDGMENTS group the Amylocorticiales manifests many of the evolutionary trends evident across the Agaricomy- We thank Karen Nakasone (CFMR), Roy Halling (NYBG) cetes as a whole. The Amylocorticiales appears to be and all the others who have provided materials for this primitively corticioid and to have undergone re- study. Joseph Vieira is thanked for assisting with software peated elaboration in fruiting body form and updates on the Clark Linux computer cluster. We are hymenophore configuration, although no known particularly grateful for the help of Yu-Cheng Dai, Olli Manninen, Tom May, Kilian Mu¨hlebach and Kevin Thiele agaricoid forms are in the group. The Amylocorti- who made their images available for publication. Two ciales is also of interest from a physiological anonymous reviewers are thanked for their valuable perspective, being one of six major clades of suggestions. This research was support by NSF awards Agaricomycotina in which the brown rot mode of DEB-0444531 (MB PI, Global Boletales), DEB-0732968 wood decay has evolved (the others are the Polypor- (DSH PI, AFTOL2), and DBI-0320875 (DSH PI, Clark ales, Gloeophyllales, Boletales, Agaricales [Fistulina] computer cluster). and Dacrymycetales; Hibbett and Donoghue 2001). The occurrence of plant pathogens and possibly ectomycorrhizal taxa in the group further exempli- LITERATURE CITED fies the ecological adaptability of Agaricomycetes and Agerer R. 1987–1998. Color Atlas of Ectomycorrhizae. 1st– invites investigations into the mechanistic basis of 11th delivery. Schwa¨bisch Gmu¨nd, Germany: Einhorn shifts in nutritional modes. Verlag. The present study reinforces the view that corti- Altschul SF, Madden TL, Scha¨ffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, cioid fungi, while accounting for a relatively small Miller W, Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI- BLAST: a new generation of protein database search fraction of described species, contain a disproportio- programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402. nately large number of the major clades of Agarico- Binder M, Hibbett DS. 2002. Higher-level phylogenetic mycetes (Larsson et al. 2004, Larsson 2007) and could relationships of homobasidiomycetes (- represent the plesiomorphic form of the entire class forming fungi) inferred from four rDNA regions. Mol (Hibbett and Binder 2002, Hibbett 2004). There is a Phylogenet Evol 22:76–90. striking imbalance in the number of described species ———, ———. 2006. Molecular systematics and biological in the Amylocorticiales (roughly 70 species), Athe- diversification of Boletales. Mycologia 98:971–981. liales (ca. 95 spp.), and Jaapiales (two spp., Jaapia ———, ———, Larsson KH, Larsson E, Langer E, Langer argillacea and J. ochroleuca [FIG. 3H]) compared to G. 2005. The phylogenetic distribution of resupinate the Agaricales (ca. 13 000 spp.) and Boletales (ca. forms across the major clades of mushroom-forming 1300 spp.). To some extent this is probably due to fungi (homobasidiomycetes). Syst Biodivers 3:113–157. Bougher NL, Syme K. 1998. Fungi of southern Australia. under sampling of corticioid fungi, but it is hard to Perth, Australia: Univ. Western Australia Press. 391 p. believe that taxonomic bias alone could account for Bruns TD, Szaro TM, Gardes M, Cullings KW, Pan JJ, Taylor the magnitude of the disparity. Instead it is likely that DL, Horton TR, Kretzer AM, Garbelotto M, Li Y. 1998. there have been repeated shifts in diversification rates A sequence database for the identification of ectomy- in the Agaricomycetidae, with speciation rates in- corrhizal basidiomycetes by phylogenetic analysis. Mol creasing (or extinction rates decreasing) in the Ecol 7:257–272. Agaricales and Boletales relative to the Amylocorti- Danielson RM, Pruden M. 1989. The mycorrhizal status of ciales, Atheliales and Jaapiales. It is tempting to urban . Mycologia 81:335–341. speculate that the evolution of agaricoid and boletoid Eriksson J, Ryvarden L. 1973. The of North fruiting body forms, which are lacking in the Europe. Vol. 2, Aleurodiscus-Confertobasidium. Oslo, Amylocorticiales, Atheliales and Jaapiales, could have Norway: Fungiflora. Erland S, Taylor AFS. 1999. Resupinate ectomycorrhizal spurred diversification in the Agaricales and Bole- fungal genera. In: Cairney JM, ed. Ectomycorrhizal tales. The evolution of ectomycorrhizal living strate- fungi: key genera in profile. Heidelberg, Germany: gies also could have been a ‘‘key innovation’’ in the Springer-Verlag. p 347–363. Agaricomycetidae, but this does not explain why the Ertz D, Lawrey JD, Sikaroodi M, Gillevet PM, Fischer E, largely ectomycorrhizal Atheliales have remained Killmann D, Se´rusiaux E. 2008. A new lineage of such a small group. The present study reconstructed lichenized basidiomycetes inferred from a two-gene BINDER ET AL.: NEW ORDERS OF AGARICOMYCETIDAE 879

phylogeny: The Lepidostromataceae with three species availability to late successional western hemlock. from the tropics. Am J Bot 95:1548–1556. 15:393–403. Fries N. 1978. Basidiospore germination in some mycor- Hosaka K, Bates ST, Beever RE, Castellano MA, Colgan W, rhiza-forming Hymenomycetes. Trans Br Mycol Soc 70: Domı´nguez LS, Nouhra ER, Geml J, Giachini AJ, 319–324. Kenney SR, Simpson NB, Trappe JM. 2006. Molecular Gardes M, Bruns TD. 1993. ITS primers with enhanced phylogenetics of the gomphoid-phalloid fungi with an specificity for Basidiomycetes: application to identifica- establishment of the new subclass Phallomycetidae and tion of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2:113–118. two new orders. Mycologia 98:949–959. Garnica S, Weiss M, Walther G, Oberwinkler F. 2007. James TY, Kauff F, Schoch C, Matheny PB, Hofstetter V, Cox Reconstructing the evolution of agarics from nuclear C, Celio G, Gueidan C, Fraker E, Miadlikowska J, gene sequences and basidiospore ultrastructure. Mycol Lumbsch HT, Rauhut A, Reeb V, Arnold AE, Amtoft A, Res 9:1019–1029. Stajich JE, Hosaka K, Sung G-H, Johnson D, O’Rourke Gilbert OL. 1988. Studies on the destruction of Lecanora B, Crockett M, Binder M, Curtis JM, Slot JC, Wang Z, conizaeoides by the lichenicolous fungus Athelia ara- Wilson AW, Schu¨ßler A, Longcore JE, O’Donnell K, chnoidea. Lichenologist 20:183–190. Mozley-Standridge S, Porter D, Letcher PM, Powell MJ, Ginns JH. 1976. : s.s. and s.l., taxonomic disposition Taylor JW, White MM, Griffith GW, Davies DR, Humber and identification of species. Can J Bot 54:100–167. RA, Morton JB, Sugiyama J, Rossman AY, Rogers JD, ———, Lefebvre MNL. 1993. Lignicolous corticioid fungi Pfister DH, Hewitt D, Hansen K, Hambleton S, Shoe- (Basidiomycota) of North America. Mycol Mem 19:1– maker RA, Kohlmeyer J, Volkmann-Kohlmeyer B, 247. Spotts RA, Serdani M, Crous PW, Hughes KW, Hibbett DS. 2004. Trends in morphological evolution in Matsuura K, Langer E, Langer G, Untereiner WA, homobasidiomycetes inferred using maximum like- Lu¨cking R, Bu¨del B, Geiser DM, Aptroot A, Diederich lihood: a comparison of binary and multistate ap- P, Schmitt I, Schultz M, Yahr R, Hibbett DS, Lutzoni F, proaches. Syst Biol 53:889–903. McLaughlin D, Spatafora J, Vilgalys R. 2006. Recon- ———. 2007. After the gold rush, or before the flood? structing the early evolution of the fungi using a six- Evolutionary morphology of mushroom-forming fungi gene phylogeny. Nature 443:818–822. (Agaricomycetes) in the early 21st century. Mycol Res Ju¨lich W. 1978. A new lichenized Athelia from Florida. 111:1001–1018. Persoonia 10:149–151. ———, Binder M. 2002. Evolution of complex fruiting-body Kirk PM, Cannon PF, David JC, Minter DW, Stalpers JA. morphologies in homobasidiomycetes. Proc R Soc 2008. Ainsworth and Bisby’s Dictionary of the Fungi. London B 269:1963–1969. 10th ed. Wallingford, Oxon, United Kingdom: CAB ———, ———, Bischoff JF, Blackwell M, Cannon PF, International University Press. Eriksson OE, Huhndorf S, James T, Kirk PM, Lu¨cking Larsson KH. 2007. Re-thinking the classification of corti- R, Lumbsch T, Lutzoni F, Matheny PB, Mclaughlin DJ, cioid fungi. Mycol Res 111:1040–1063. Powell MJ, Redhead S, Schoch CL, Spatafora JW, ———, Larsson E, Ko˜ljalg U. 2004. High phylogenetic Stalpers JA, Vilgalys R, Aime MC, Aptroot A, Bauer R, diversity among corticioid homobasidomycetes. Mycol Begerow D, Benny GL, Castlebury LA, Crous PW, Dai Res 108:983–1002. Y-C, Gams W, Geiser DM, Griffith GW, Gueidan C, Lilleskov EA, Bruns TD, Horton TR, Taylor DL, Grogan P. Hawksworth DL, Hestmark G, Hosaka K, Humber RA, 2004. Detection of forest stand-level spatial structure in Hyde K, Ironside JE, Ko˜ljalg U, Kurtzman CP, Larsson ectomycorrhizal fungal communities. FEMS Microbiol K-H, Lichtwardt R, Longcore J, Mia˛dlikowska J, Miller Ecol 49:319–332. A, Moncalvo J-M, Mozley-Standridge S, Oberwinkler F, Lindsey JP, Gilbertson RL. 1978. Basidiomycetes that decay Parmasto E, Reeb V, Rogers JD, Roux C, Ryvarden L, aspen in North America. Bibl Mycol 63:1–406. Sampaio JP, Schu¨ßler A, Sugiyama J, Thorn RG, Tibell Maddison DR, Maddison WP. 2005. MacClade 4: analysis of L, Untereiner WA, Walker C, Wang Z, Weir A, Weiß M, phylogeny and character evolution. Sunderland, Mas- White MM, Winka K, Yao Y-J, Zhang N. 2007. A higher- sachusetts: Sinauer Associates. level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi. Mycol Res Maddison WP, Midford PE, Otto SP. 2007. Estimating a 111:509–547. binary character’s effect on speciation and extinction. ———, Donoghue MJ. 2001. Analysis of correlations among Syst Biol 56:701–710. wood decay mechanisms, mating systems and substrate Matheny PB. 2005. Improving phylogenetic inference of ranges in homobasidiomycetes. Syst Biol 50:215–242. mushrooms with RPB1 and RPB2 nucleotide sequences ———, Gilbert L-B, Donoghue MJ. 2000. Evolutionary (Inocybe, Agaricales). Mol Phylogenet Evol 35:1–20. instability of ectomycorrhizal symbioses in basidiomy- ———, Curtis JM, Hofstetter V, Aime MC, Moncalvo J-M, Ge cetes. Nature 407:506–508. ZW, Yang ZL, Slot JC, Ammirati JF, Baroni TJ, Bougher ———, EM, Langer E, Langer G, Donoghue MJ. 1997. NL, Hughes KW, Lodge DJ, Kerrigan RW, Seidl MT, Evolution of gilled mushrooms and puffballs inferred Aanen DK, DeNitis M, Daniele GM, Desjardin DE, from ribosomal DNA sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci Kropp BR, Norvell LL, Parker A, Vellinga EC, Vilgalys USA 94:12002–12006. R, Hibbett DS. 2006. Major clades of Agaricales: a Horton TR, Molina R, Hood K. 2005. Douglas- ectomy- multilocus phylogenetic overview. Mycologia 98:982– corrhizae in 40- and 400-year-old stands: mycobiont 995. 880 MYCOLOGIA

———, Liu YJ, Ammirati JF, Hall BD. 2002. Using RPB1 Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian sequences to improve phylogenetic inference among phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinfor- mushrooms (Inocybe, Agaricales). Am J Bot 89:688– matics 19:1572–1574. 698. Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood- ———, Wang Z, Binder M, Curtis JM, Lim Y-W, Nilsson RH, based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and Hughes KW, Hofstetter V, Ammirati JF, Schoch C, mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688–2690. Langer E, McLaughlin DJ, Wilson AW, Frøslev T, Ge Z- ———, Hoover P, Rougemont J. 2008. A rapid bootstrap W, Kerrigan RW, Slot JC, Vellinga EC, Yang Z-L, Baroni algorithm for the RAxML Web-servers. Syst Biol 75: TJ, Fischer M, Hosaka K, Matsuura K, Seidl MT, Vaura 758–771. J, Hibbett DS. 2007. Contributions of rpb2 and tef1 to Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using the phylogeny of mushrooms and allies (Basidiomy- parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b10. cota, Fungi). Mol Phylogenet Evol 43:430–451. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates. Matsuura K, Tanaka C, Nishida T. 2000. Symbiosis of a Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, termite and a sclerotium forming fungus: Sclerotia Higgins DG. 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: mimic termite eggs. Ecol Res 15:405–414. flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment Moncalvo J-M, Lutzoni FM, Rehner SA, Johnson J, Vilgalys aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25: R. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of agaric fungi 4876–4882. based on nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA Vilgalys R, Hester M. 1990. Rapid genetic identification and sequences. Syst Biol 49:278–305. mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA Munkacsi AB, Pan JJ, Villesen P, Mueller UG, Blackwell M, from several Cryptococcus species. J Bacteriol 172:4238– McLaughlin DJ. 2004. Convergent co-evolution in the 4246. domestication of coral mushrooms by fungus-growing White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee S, Taylor J. 1990. Amplification ants. Proc R Soc London B 271:1777–1782. and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes Niemela¨T,LarssonK-H,DaiY-C,LarssonE.2007. for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky Anomoloma, a new genus separated from JJ, White TJ, eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods Anomoporia on the basis of decay type and molecular and applications. San Diego: Academic Press. p 315– phylogenetic data. Mycotaxon 100:305–318. 322. Oberwinkler F. 1970. Die Gattungen der Basidiolichenen. Yurchenko EO, Golubkov VV. 2003. The morphology, Dt Bot Ges Neue Folge 4:139–169. biology and geography of a necrotrophic basidiomycete Posada D, Crandall KA. 2001. Selecting the best-fit model of Athelia arachnoidea in Belarus. Mycol Prog 2:275–284. nucleotide substitution. Syst Biol 50:580–601. Zmitrovich IV, Spirin VA. 2002. A contribution to the Rehner SA, Buckley EP. 2005. Cryptic diversification in taxonomy of corticioid fungi II. The genera Serpula, Beauveria bassiana inferred from nuclear its and ef1- Serpulomyces gen. nov., Amylocorticiellum gen. nov. alpha phylogenies. Mycologia 97:84–98. Mikol Fitopatol 36:11–26. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE I. Complete list of species used in this study and GenBank entries. Accession numbers for newly generated sequencing data are highlighted in boldface type. Sequences assembled from multiple isolates are indicated by n/a in the second column. An asterisk at the isolate number emphasizes that the sequences were represented by two strains; the number for the main isolate used to generate new data is provided.

GenBank accession numbers Species Isolate ID ITS, 5.8S nuc-lsu nuc-ssu rpb1 rpb2 tef1 bisporus AFTOL-448* DQ404388 AY635775 AY787216 — AF107785 GU187673 Agrocybe praecox AFTOL-728 AY818348 AY646101 AY705956 DQ516069 DQ385876 DQ061276 Amanita brunnescens AFTOL-673 AY789079 AY631902 AY707096 AY788847 AY780936 AY881021 Amphinema byssoides EL11_98 GQ162810 GQ162810 — — — — Ampulloclitocybe clavipes AFTOL-542 AY789080 AY639881 AY771612 AY788848 AY780937 AY881022 Amyloathelia crassiuscula GB/K169-796 DQ144610 DQ144610 — — — — Amylocorticiellum subillaqueatum KHL8493 AY463431 AY586679 — — — — Amylocorticium cebennense HHB-2808 GU187505 GU187561 GU187612 GU187439 GU187770 GU187675 Amylocorticium subincarnatum AS_95 AY463377 AY586628 — — — — Amylocorticium subsulphureum HHB-13817 GU187506 GU187562 GU187617 GU187443 GU187773 GU187680 Amyloxenasma allantosporum KHL s. n. GU187498 GU187666 — — — — Anomoloma myceliosum MJL-4413 GU187500 GU187559 GU187614 GU187441 GU187766 GU187677 Anomoloma albolutescens L-6088 GU187507 GU187563 GU187618 GU187438 GU187768 GU187671 Anomoporia bombycina L-6240 GU187508 GU187564 GU187611 — GU187765 GU187674 Anomoporia kamtschatica KHL11072 AY463379 AY586630 — — — — Anthracophyllum archeri AFTOL-973 DQ404387 AY745709 DQ092915 DQ435799 DQ385877 DQ028586 Aphanobasidium pseudotsugae HHB-822 GU187509 GU187567 GU187620 GU187455 GU187781 GU187695 Armillaria mellea AFTOL-449 AY789081 AY700194 AY787217 AY788849 AY780938 AY881023 Asterophora lycoperdoides n/a AF357037 AF223190 DQ367417 DQ367424 DQ367431 DQ367424 Athelia arachnoidea CBS418.72 GU187504 GU187557 GU187616 GU187436 GU187769 GU187672 Athelia epiphylla FP-100564 GU187501 GU187558 GU187613 GU187440 GU187771 GU187676 Athelia rolfsii AFTOL-664 DQ484061 AY635773 AY665774 — GU187821 GU187681 Athelia sp. FP-133442 GU187503 GU187560 GU187615 GU187442 GU187772 GU187679 Athelia sp. L-10567 GU187537 GU187592 GU187645 GU187477 GU187802 GU187739 Athelia sp. HHB-15599 GU187502 GU187565 GU187619 GU187437 GU187767 GU187678 Athelopsis glaucina KHL11901 GU187495 GU187662 — — — — Athelopsis subinconspicua KHL8490 AY463383 AY586634 — — — — Aureoboletus thibetanus AFTOL-450 DQ200917 AY700189 AY654882 DQ435800 DQ366279 DQ029199 sp. n/a DQ534572 DQ534670 DQ534673 — — — Baeospora myosura AFTOL-1799 DQ484063 DQ457648 DQ435796 DQ435801 DQ470827 GU187762 Bolbitius vitellinus AFTOL-730 DQ200920 AY691807 AY705955 DQ435802 DQ385878 DQ408148 Boletellus projectellus AFTOL-713 AY789082 AY684158 AY662660 AY788850 AY787218 AY879116 Boletellus shichianus AFTOL-532 DQ200921 AY647211 AY657011 — DQ366280 DQ408145 AFTOL-575 DQ200922 AY684153 AY662668 DQ435803 DQ366281 DQ056287 Boletus edulis Be3* AY680988 AF456816 DQ534675 GU187444 GU187774 GU187682 Species Isolate ID ITS,5.8S nuc-lsu nuc-ssu rpb1 rpb2 tef1 Boletopsis leucomelaena AFTOL-1527 DQ484064 DQ154112 DQ435797 GU187494 GU187820 GU187763 Bondarcevomyces taxi Dai2524 DQ534575 DQ534672 DQ534677 — — GU187683 Callistosporium graminicolor AFTOL-978 DQ484065 AY745702 AY752974 GU187493 DQ825406 GU187761 Calostoma cinnabarinum AFTOL-439 AY854064 AY645054 AY665773 AY857979 AY780939 AY879117 Camarophyllopsis hymenocephala AFTOL-1892 DQ484066 DQ457679 DQ444862 DQ516070 DQ472726 — Camarophyllopsis schultzeri GG091005 GU187556 EF537888 GU187661 — GU187819 GU187696 Camarophyllus basidiosus AFTOL-1759 DQ486684 DQ457651 DQ435809 DQ435805 DQ470828 gruberi AFTOL-1017 DQ200927 DQ234540 DQ234547 DQ435808 DQ385879 DQ059045 Catathelasma ventricosum AFTOL-1488 DQ486686 DQ089012 DQ435811 — DQ470830 — Ceraceomyces tessulatus KHL8474 AY463391 AY586642 — — — — Chalciporus piperatus MB 04-001* DQ822797 DQ534648 DQ534679 GU187453 — GU187690 Cheimonophyllum candidissimum AFTOL-1765 DQ486687 DQ457654 DQ435812 DQ447888 DQ470831 GU187760 Chondrostereum purpureum AFTOL-441* DQ200929 AF518607 AF082851 — AY218477 — Chrysomphalina grossula AFTOL-981* DQ486689 U66444 AY752969 DQ516072 DQ470832 — Clavaria zollingeri AFTOL-563 AY854071 AY639882 AY657008 AY857987 AY780940 AY881024 Clavulinopsis laeticolor AFTOL-984 DQ202267 AY745693 DQ437680 DQ447890 DQ385880 DQ029198 Climacodon septentrionalis AFTOL-767 AY854082 AY684165 AY705964 AY864873 AY780941 AY885151 candicans AFTOL-541 DQ202268 AY645055 AY771609 DQ447891 DQ385881 DQ408149 Clitocybe nebularis AFTOL-1495 DQ486691 DQ457658 DQ437681 DQ825415 DQ470833 — Clitocybe subditopoda AFTOL-533 DQ202269 AY691889 AY771608 DQ447892 AY780942 DQ408150 Clitopilus prunulus AFTOL-522 DQ202272 AY700181 AY771607 DQ825416 DQ825408 — Collybia tuberosa AFTOL-577 AY854072 AY639884 AY771606 AY857982 AY787219 AY881025 Coniophora arida FP-104367 GU187510 GU187573 GU187622 GU187445 GU187775 GU187684 Coniophora arida v. suffocata MUCL30844 GU187511 GU187568 GU187623 GU187457 GU187779 GU187685 Coniophora cerebella HK’8’ GU187513 GU187569 GU187625 GU187447 GU187776 GU187687 Coniophora marmorata MUCL31667 GU187515 GU187571 GU187626 GU187448 GU187780 GU187688 Coniophora olivacea FP-104386 GU187516 GU187572 GU187627 GU187452 — GU187689 Coniophora prasinoides FP-105969 GU187519 GU187576 GU187621 GU187450 GU187785 GU187691 Coniophora puteana MUCL1000 GU187521 GU187578 GU187631 GU187451 GU187778 GU187693 Coniophora sp. Braz-6 GU187517 GU187575 GU187628 GU187458 GU187784 GU187697 Conocybe lactea AFTOL-1675 DQ486693 DQ457660 DQ437683 DQ447893 DQ470834 — Coprinopsis cinerea n/a AF345819 AF041494 Broad genome Broad genome Broad genome Broad genome Coprinus comatus AFTOL-626 AY854066 AY635772 AY665772 AY857983 AY780934 AY881026 Coronicium alboglaucum NH4208 AY463400 AY586650 — — — — Cortinarius iodes AFTOL-285 AF389133 AY702013 AY771605 AY857984 AY536285 AY881027 Cotylidia sp. AFTOL-700 AY854079 AY629317 AY705958 AY864868 AY883422 AY885148 applanatus AFTOL-817 DQ202273 AY380406 AY705951 AY333303 AY333311 DQ028581 Crinipellis perniciosa n/a AY916701 AY916699 AY916700 AY916702 — — Cristinia rhenana 344311 GU187496 GU187663 — — — — Cristinia sp. FP-100305 GU187526 GU187585 GU187637 GU187470 GU187793 GU187718 Species Isolate ID ITS,5.8S nuc-lsu nuc-ssu rpb1 rpb2 tef1 Cyathus striatus AFTOL-1333 DQ486697 AF336247 AF026617 DQ447895 DQ472711 GU187694 Echinodontium tinctorium AFTOL-455 AY854088 AF393056 AF026578 AY864882 AY218482 AY885157 Entoloma prunuloides AFTOL-523 DQ206983 AY700180 AY665784 DQ447898 DQ385883 DQ457633 Fibulorhizoctonia sp. AFTOL-576 AY854062 AY635779 AY654887 AY857985 AY885161 AY879115 Fistulina antarctica AFTOL-1335 DQ486702 AY293181 AY293131 DQ447899 DQ472713 GU187698 Flammula alnicola AFTOL-1501 DQ486703 DQ457666 DQ113916 DQ447900 DQ472714 GU187699 Flammulina velutipes AFTOL-558 AY854073 AY639883 AY665781 AY858966 AY786055 AY883423 Fomitopsis pinicola AFTOL-770 AY854083 AY684164 AY705967 AY864874 AY786056 AY885152 otthii AFTOL-466* AF377073 AF336249 AF393043 AY864864 AY218486 AY883434 semilanceata AFTOL-1497 DQ486706 AY038309 DQ440639 AF389531 AY337357 — Gomphidius roseus AFTOL-1780 DQ534570 DQ534669 DQ534682 GU187459 GU187818 GU187702 Gymnopus contrarius AFTOL-1758 DQ486708 DQ457670 DQ440643 DQ447902 DQ472716 GU187700 Gymnopus dryophilus AFTOL-559 DQ241781 AY640619 AY665779 DQ447903 DQ472717 DQ408152 lividus REG Gl1 DQ534568 AF098378 DQ534681 GU187461 GU187786 GU187701 Gyrodontium sacchari MUCL40589 GU187522 GU187579 GU187632 GU187460 GU187764 GU187703 Gyroporus sp. AFTOL-1518* EU718107 EF561627 DQ534680 FJ536603 FJ536643 GU187704 Hebeloma velutipes AFTOL-980 AY818351 AY745703 AY752972 DQ447904 DQ472718 GU187707 Hemimycena gracilis AFTOL-1732 DQ490623 DQ457671 DQ440644 DQ447905 DQ472719 GU187709 Henningsomyces candidus AFTOL-468 AY571043 AF287864 AF334916 AY860521 AY218513 AY883424 geogenium AFTOL-680 DQ218304 AY631900 AY752971 — DQ408133 DQ059053 Hydnomerulius pinastri MD-312 GU187523 GU187580 GU187633 GU187462 GU187787 GU187708 Hydropus cf. scabripes AFTOL-535 DQ404389 DQ411536 DQ444855 DQ447908 DQ457634 — Hygrocybe aff. conica AFTOL-729 AY854074 AY684167 AY752965 AY860522 AY803747 AY883425 Hygrocybe coccinea AFTOL-1715 DQ490629 DQ457676 DQ444858 DQ447910 DQ472723 GU187705 aurantiaca AFTOL-714 AY854067 AY684156 AY662663 AY858961 AY786059 AY883427 Hygrophorus auratocephalus AFTOL-1337 DQ490625 AF042580 AF287833 — — GU187706 Hygrophorus pudorinus AFTOL-1723 DQ490631 DQ457678 DQ444861 DQ447912 DQ472725 GU187710 gibba AFTOL-1508 DQ490635 DQ457682 DQ115780 DQ447913 DQ472727 GU187759 Inocybe dulcamara AFTOL-482 DQ221106 AY700196 AY657016 DQ447916 AY803751 DQ435791 Jaapia argillacea CBS252.74 GU187524 GU187581 AF518581 GU187463 GU187788 GU187711 Kuehneromyces rostratus AFTOL-1676 DQ490638 DQ457684 DQ457624 DQ447918 DQ472730 GU187712 Laccaria bicolor S238N-H82 JGI genome JGI genome JGI genome JGI genome JGI genome JGI genome Lachnella villosa AFTOL-525 DQ097362 DQ097362 AY70595 — DQ472732 GU187721 Lactarius deceptivus AFTOL-682 AY854089 AY631899 AY707093 AY864883 AY803749 AY885158 Lepista irina AFTOL-815 DQ221109 DQ234538 AY705948 DQ447919 DQ385885 DQ028591 Leptosporomyces septentrionalis JS16122 GU187497 GU187664 — — — — Leptosporomyces raunkiaerii HHB-7628 GU187528 GU187588 GU187640 GU187471 GU187791 GU187719 Leucoagaricus barssii AFTOL-1899 DQ911600 DQ911601 GU187658 DQ911603 DQ911602 GU187722 Leucogyrophana arizonica RLG-9902 GU187527 GU187582 GU187636 GU187466 GU187792 — Leucogyrophana lichenicola DAOM194172 GU187531 GU187583 GU187638 GU187467 GU187789 GU187715 Species Isolate ID ITS,5.8S nuc-lsu nuc-ssu rpb1 rpb2 tef1 Leucogyrophana mollusca L-10277 GU187525 GU187584 GU187634 GU187468 GU187817 — Leucogyrophana montana 2998a — GU187665 — — — — Leucogyrophana olivascens HHB-11134 GU187532 GU187587 GU187639 GU187469 GU187790 GU187717 Leucogyrophana romellii T-547 GU187529 GU187586 GU187635 GU187465 GU187794 GU187720 Lycoperdon pyriforme AFTOL-480 AY854075 AF287873 AF026619 AY860523 AY218495 AY883426 Lyophyllum decastes n/a AF357059 AF042583 DQ367419 DQ825418 DQ367433 EF421067 Macrolepiota dolichaula AFTOL-481 DQ221111 DQ411537 AY771602 DQ447920 DQ385886 DQ435785 Macrotyphula fistulosa n/a AJ296348 DQ071735 — DQ068002 — — rotula AFTOL-1505 DQ182506 DQ457686 DQ113912 DQ447922 DQ474118 GU187723 platyphylla AFTOL-560 DQ249275 AY635778 AY786053 DQ447923 DQ385887 DQ435786 Melanoleuca verrucipes AFTOL-818 DQ490642 DQ457687 DQ457645 DQ447924 DQ474119 GU187726 amabilissima AFTOL-1686 DQ490644 DQ457691 DQ457647 DQ447926 DQ474121 GU187727 Mycena aurantiidisca AFTOL-1685 DQ490646 DQ470811 DQ457694 DQ447927 DQ474122 GU187728 Mycena galericulata AFTOL-727 DQ404392 AY647216 DQ457696 GU187491 DQ385888 — Mycena plumbea AFTOL-1631 DQ494677 DQ470813 DQ457697 DQ447928 — GU187729 alliaceus AFTOL-556 AY854076 AY635776 AY787214 AY860525 AY786060 AY883431 Mythicomyces corneipes AFTOL-972 DQ404393 AY745707 DQ092917 DQ447929 DQ408110 DQ029197 Nolanea sericea VHAs03/02 DQ367430 DQ367423 DQ367421 DQ825424 DQ367435 DQ367428 Paragyrodon sphaerosporus MB 06-066 GU187540 GU187593 GU187642 — GU187803 GU187737 vernalis AFTOL-715 DQ267128 AY645059 AY662662 — — DQ457629 Peniophorella praetermissa AFTOL-518 AY854081 AY700185 AY707094 AY864871 AY787221 AY885150 Phaeocollybia festiva AFTOL-1489 DQ494682 AY509119 DQ462516 AY509117 AY509118 — Phaeomarasmius proximans AFTOL-979 DQ404381 AY380410 AY752970 AY333307 AY333314 DQ028592 Phlebopus portentosus REG Php1 DQ534569 AF336260 DQ534687 GU187476 GU187801 GU187735 Phyllotopsis sp. AFTOL-773 DQ404382 AY684161 AY707090 DQ447933 AY786061 DQ059047 Physalacria bambusae AFTOL-515 DQ097367 DQ097349 AY705953 DQ447934 DQ474123 GU187732 Piloderma fallax S-12 GU187535 GU187591 GU187644 pseudogene GU187797 GU187738 Piloderma byssinum KHL8501 DQ469282 DQ469282 — — — — Piloderma lanatum JS24861 AY463454 AY586700 — — — — Pisolithus arrhizus REG 588 GU187538 AF336262 DQ534688 GU187473 GU187798 — Pleurocybella porrigens AFTOL-2001* AB214900 EF537894 GU187660 DQ067994 — GU187740 Pleuroflammula flammea AFTOL-1381 DQ494685 AF367962 DQ089021 DQ447935 DQ474124 GU187741 Pleurotus ostreatus AFTOL-564 AY85407 AY645052 AY657015 AY862186 AY786062 AY883432 Plicaturopsis crispa AFTOL-1924 DQ494686 DQ470820 AY293148 — GU187816 — Pluteus romellii AFTOL-625 AY854065 AY634279 AY657014 AY862187 AY786063 AY883433 Podoserpula pusio AFTOL-1522 DQ494688 DQ470821 — — GU187804 — Porothelium fimbriatum AFTOL-1725 DQ490626 DQ457673 DQ444854 DQ447907 DQ472721 — Pseudoarmillariella ectypoides AFTOL-1557 DQ192175 DQ154111 DQ465341 DQ465341 DQ474127 GU187733 Porphyrellus porphyrosporus AFTOL-1779 DQ534563 DQ534643 DQ534689 GU187475 GU187800 GU187734 Pseudoclitocybe cyathiformis AFTOL-1998* GU187553 EF551313 GU187659 DQ067939 GU187815 GU187742 Species Isolate ID ITS,5.8S nuc-lsu nuc-ssu rpb1 rpb2 tef1 Pseudomerulius aureus FP-103859 GU187534 GU187590 GU187643 GU187474 GU187799 GU187731 Pseudomerulius curtisii REH8912 GU187533 GU187589 GU187641 GU187472 GU187796 GU187725 Pterula echo AFTOL-711 DQ494693 AY629315 DQ092911 — GU187805 GU187743 strigosozonata AFTOL-1248 DQ398598 AF518642 AF518586 DQ831031 DQ381843 DQ408147 Radulomyces rickii JK951007 AY463460 AY586706 — — — — Ramariopsis kunzei GG141104 GU187552 EF561638 GU187647 GU187479 GU187807 GU187745 Rhizopogon nigrescens MB 06-070 — GU187594 GU187646 GU187478 GU187806 GU187744 Rhodocollybia maculata AFTOL-540 DQ404383 AY639880 AY752966 DQ447936 AY787220 DQ061279 Rhodocybe mundula AFTOL-521 DQ494694 AY700182 DQ089017 DQ447937 DQ474128 — Sarcomyxa serotina AFTOL-536* DQ494695 AY691887 AF026590 DQ447938 DQ859892 GU187754 Schizophyllum radiatum AFTOL-516 AY571060 AY571023 AY705952 DQ447939 DQ484052 — REG 383 GU187542 GU187596 GU187649 GU187485 GU187809 GU187752 Serpula himantioides MUCL30528 GU187545 GU187600 GU187651 GU187480 GU187808 GU187748 Serpula himantioides RLG-12941 GU187547 GU187602 GU187654 GU187484 GU187811 GU187750 Serpula incrassata DAOM170590 GU187541 GU187595 GU187652 GU187481 — GU187751 Serpula similis MUCL43280 GU187546 GU187601 GU187653 GU187486 GU187812 GU187724 Serpula tignicola CBS311.54 GU187543 GU187597 GU187650 GU187487 — GU187753 Serpulomyces borealis L-8014 GU187512 GU187570 GU187624 GU187446 GU187782 GU187686 Simocybe serrulata AFTOL-890 DQ494696 AY745706 DQ465343 DQ447940 DQ484053 GU187755 Stephanospora caroticolor IOC-137/97* AJ419224 AF518652 AF518591 — — GU187747 hirsutum AFTOL-492 AY854063 AF393078 AF026588 AY864885 AY218520 AY885159 Strobilomyces floccopus AFTOL-716 AY854068 AY684155 AY662661 AY858963 AY786065 AY883428 Stropharia ambigua AFTOL-726 AY818350 AY646102 DQ092924 DQ447941 DQ484054 GU187756 Suillus bresadolae REG 394 GU187544 GU187598 GU187648 GU187482 GU187810 GU187746 Suillus pictus AFTOL-717 AY854069 AY684154 AY662659 AY858965 AY786066 AY883429 Tapinella atrotomentosa REG 78/97 GU187549 GU187603 GU187655 GU187488 GU187813 GU187757 Tapinella panuoides MB 05-019 GU187548 GU187604 GU187657 GU187490 — — Tephrocybe boudieri BSI96/84 DQ825427 DQ825430 DQ825433 DQ825421 DQ825411 EF421070 Termitomyces sp. AFTOL-1384 DQ494698 DQ110875 DQ092922 DQ447942 — — Tricholoma myomyces n/a AF377210 AF518660 AF287841 DQ842013 DQ367436 DQ367429 Tricholomopsis decora AFTOL-537 DQ404384 AY691888 DQ092914 DQ447943 DQ408112 DQ029195 Tubaria vinicolor AFTOL-499 DQ536417 DQ536415 DQ536416 DQ536419 DQ536418 — phacorrhiza n/a AF134710 AF393079 AF026630 — AY218525 — Volvariella gloiocephala AFTOL-890 DQ494701 AY745710 DQ089020 DQ447945 — — Xeromphalina campanella AFTOL-1524 DQ494702 DQ470826 DQ465344 DQ516077 — GU187758 Xerula radicata AFTOL-561 DQ241780 AY645051 AY654884 DQ447946 AY786067 —

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE II. List of species and GenBank accession numbers of newly generated data not included in the final six-gene analyses based on incompleteness or redundancy, and phylogenetic placement. The Ceraceomyces species included here marked with asterisks are placed in the Polyporales and have therefore been omitted from all analyses. GenBank accession numbers Species Isolate ID ITS,5.8S nuc-lsu nuc-ssu rpb1 rpb2 tef1 Athelopsis lacerata KHL s. n. — GU187669 — — — — Austropaxillus infundibuliformis Trappe 27619 GU187499 GU187566 — — — — umbonata Caum1 — — — GU187456 — — Ceraceomyces americanus* FP-101981 — GU187606 — — — — Ceraceomyces fouquieriae* KKN-121 — GU187608 — — — — Ceraceomyces serpens* HHB-3512 — GU187609 — — — — Ceraceomyces subapiculatus FO.032/05 — GU187668 — — — — Ceraceomyces sublaevis* FP-101245 — GU187607 — — — — Ceraceomyces sulfurinus* HHB-5604 — GU187610 — — — — Chroogomphus helveticus 37/96 GU187514 — — — GU187783 — Coniophora arida AFTOL-698 — — — GU187456 — — Coniophora marmorata DAOM178982 — — — GU187449 — — Coniophora puteana MAD-515 GU187520 GU187577 GU187630 GU187454 GU187777 GU187692 Coniophora sp. HHB-17606 GU187518 GU187574 GU187629 — — — Hypochniciellum molle KHL13500 — GU187667 — — — — Jaapia aff. ochroleuca KHL13691 — GU187667 — — — — Leucogyrophana arizonica DAOM148660 — — — GU187464 — GU187713 Leucogyrophana mollusca DAOM138006 — — — — GU187817 — Leucogyrophana romellii DAOM148653 GU187530 — — — — — Paxillus filamentosus REG Pf1 — — — — — GU187736 Plicaturopsis crispa MB03-1301 GU187539 — — — — — Podoserpula pusio Lepp 329 ACT GU187554 — — — — — GU187555 — — — — — Pseudomerulius aureus REG 89/96 — — — — — GU187730 Pseudomerulius curtisii DJL-DR-4 GU187536 — — — — — Serpula himantioides TH-NOR — GU187599 — — — — Serpula himantioides HHB-17587 — — — GU187483 — GU187749 Tapinella atrotomentosa REG122/98 GU187550 GU187656 GU187489 GU187814 — Tapinella panuoides AN03200 — GU187605 — — — — Tapinella panuoides JLM 1752 GU187551 — — — — —