Revised Taxonomy and Phylogeny of an Avian-Dispersed Neotropical Rhizomorph-Forming Fungus
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
<I>Hydropus Mediterraneus</I>
ISSN (print) 0093-4666 © 2012. Mycotaxon, Ltd. ISSN (online) 2154-8889 MYCOTAXON http://dx.doi.org/10.5248/121.393 Volume 121, pp. 393–403 July–September 2012 Laccariopsis, a new genus for Hydropus mediterraneus (Basidiomycota, Agaricales) Alfredo Vizzini*, Enrico Ercole & Samuele Voyron Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e Biologia dei Sistemi - Università degli Studi di Torino, Viale Mattioli 25, I-10125, Torino, Italy *Correspondence to: [email protected] Abstract — Laccariopsis (Agaricales) is a new monotypic genus established for Hydropus mediterraneus, an arenicolous species earlier often placed in Flammulina, Oudemansiella, or Xerula. Laccariopsis is morphologically close to these genera but distinguished by a unique combination of features: a Laccaria-like habit (distant, thick, subdecurrent lamellae), viscid pileus and upper stipe, glabrous stipe with a long pseudorhiza connecting with Ammophila and Juniperus roots and incorporating plant debris and sand particles, pileipellis consisting of a loose ixohymeniderm with slender pileocystidia, large and thin- to thick-walled spores and basidia, thin- to slightly thick-walled hymenial cystidia and caulocystidia, and monomitic stipe tissue. Phylogenetic analyses based on a combined ITS-LSU sequence dataset place Laccariopsis close to Gloiocephala and Rhizomarasmius. Key words — Agaricomycetes, Physalacriaceae, /gloiocephala clade, phylogeny, taxonomy Introduction Hydropus mediterraneus was originally described by Pacioni & Lalli (1985) based on collections from Mediterranean dune ecosystems in Central Italy, Sardinia, and Tunisia. Previous collections were misidentified as Laccaria maritima (Theodor.) Singer ex Huhtinen (Dal Savio 1984) due to their laccarioid habit. The generic attribution to Hydropus Kühner ex Singer by Pacioni & Lalli (1985) was due mainly to the presence of reddish watery droplets on young lamellae and sarcodimitic tissue in the stipe (Corner 1966, Singer 1982). -
Checklist of Argentine Agaricales 4
Checklist of the Argentine Agaricales 4. Tricholomataceae and Polyporaceae 1 2* N. NIVEIRO & E. ALBERTÓ 1Instituto de Botánica del Nordeste (UNNE-CONICET). Sargento Cabral 2131, CC 209 Corrientes Capital, CP 3400, Argentina 2Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas (UNSAM-CONICET) Intendente Marino Km 8.200, Chascomús, Buenos Aires, CP 7130, Argentina CORRESPONDENCE TO *: [email protected] ABSTRACT— A species checklist of 86 genera and 709 species belonging to the families Tricholomataceae and Polyporaceae occurring in Argentina, and including all the species previously published up to year 2011 is presented. KEY WORDS—Agaricomycetes, Marasmius, Mycena, Collybia, Clitocybe Introduction The aim of the Checklist of the Argentinean Agaricales is to establish a baseline of knowledge on the diversity of mushrooms species described in the literature from Argentina up to 2011. The families Amanitaceae, Pluteaceae, Hygrophoraceae, Coprinaceae, Strophariaceae, Bolbitaceae and Crepidotaceae were previoulsy compiled (Niveiro & Albertó 2012a-c). In this contribution, the families Tricholomataceae and Polyporaceae are presented. Materials & Methods Nomenclature and classification systems This checklist compiled data from the available literature on Tricholomataceae and Polyporaceae recorded for Argentina up to the year 2011. Nomenclature and classification systems followed Singer (1986) for families. The genera Pleurotus, Panus, Lentinus, and Schyzophyllum are included in the family Polyporaceae. The Tribe Polyporae (including the genera Polyporus, Pseudofavolus, and Mycobonia) is excluded. There were important rearrangements in the families Tricholomataceae and Polyporaceae according to Singer (1986) over time to present. Tricholomataceae was distributed in six families: Tricholomataceae, Marasmiaceae, Physalacriaceae, Lyophyllaceae, Mycenaceae, and Hydnaginaceae. Some genera belonging to this family were transferred to other orders, i.e. Rickenella (Rickenellaceae, Hymenochaetales), and Lentinellus (Auriscalpiaceae, Russulales). -
Major Clades of Agaricales: a Multilocus Phylogenetic Overview
Mycologia, 98(6), 2006, pp. 982–995. # 2006 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897 Major clades of Agaricales: a multilocus phylogenetic overview P. Brandon Matheny1 Duur K. Aanen Judd M. Curtis Laboratory of Genetics, Arboretumlaan 4, 6703 BD, Biology Department, Clark University, 950 Main Street, Wageningen, The Netherlands Worcester, Massachusetts, 01610 Matthew DeNitis Vale´rie Hofstetter 127 Harrington Way, Worcester, Massachusetts 01604 Department of Biology, Box 90338, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 Graciela M. Daniele Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biologı´a Vegetal, M. Catherine Aime CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Co´rdoba, Casilla USDA-ARS, Systematic Botany and Mycology de Correo 495, 5000 Co´rdoba, Argentina Laboratory, Room 304, Building 011A, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-2350 Dennis E. Desjardin Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, Jean-Marc Moncalvo San Francisco, California 94132 Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, Royal Ontario Museum and Department of Botany, University Bradley R. Kropp of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2C6 Canada Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322 Zai-Wei Ge Zhu-Liang Yang Lorelei L. Norvell Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Pacific Northwest Mycology Service, 6720 NW Skyline Sciences, Kunming 650204, P.R. China Boulevard, Portland, Oregon 97229-1309 Jason C. Slot Andrew Parker Biology Department, Clark University, 950 Main Street, 127 Raven Way, Metaline Falls, Washington 99153- Worcester, Massachusetts, 01609 9720 Joseph F. Ammirati Else C. Vellinga University of Washington, Biology Department, Box Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, 111 355325, Seattle, Washington 98195 Koshland Hall, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3102 Timothy J. -
Potential of Yeasts As Biocontrol Agents of the Phytopathogen Causing Cacao Witches' Broom Disease
fmicb-10-01766 July 30, 2019 Time: 15:35 # 1 REVIEW published: 31 July 2019 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01766 Potential of Yeasts as Biocontrol Agents of the Phytopathogen Causing Cacao Witches’ Broom Disease: Is Microbial Warfare a Solution? Pedro Ferraz1,2, Fernanda Cássio1,2 and Cândida Lucas1,2* 1 Institute of Science and Innovation for Bio-Sustainability, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal, 2 Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal Edited by: Sibao Wang, Plant diseases caused by fungal pathogens are responsible for major crop losses Shanghai Institutes for Biological worldwide, with a significant socio-economic impact on the life of millions of people Sciences (CAS), China who depend on agriculture-exclusive economy. This is the case of the Witches’ Reviewed by: Mika Tapio Tarkka, Broom Disease (WBD) affecting cacao plant and fruit in South and Central America. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental The severity and extent of this disease is prospected to impact the growing global Research (UFZ), Germany chocolate market in a few decades. WBD is caused by the basidiomycete fungus Ram Prasad, Amity University, India Moniliophthora perniciosa. The methods used to contain the fungus mainly rely on *Correspondence: chemical fungicides, such as copper-based compounds or azoles. Not only are these Cândida Lucas highly ineffective, but also their utilization is increasingly restricted by the cacao industry, [email protected] in part because it promotes fungal resistance, in part related to consumers’ health Specialty section: concerns and environmental awareness. Therefore, the disease is being currently This article was submitted to tentatively controlled through phytosanitary pruning, although the full removal of infected Fungi and Their Interactions, a section of the journal plant material is impossible and the fungus maintains persistent inoculum in the soil, Frontiers in Microbiology or using an endophytic fungal parasite of Moniliophthora perniciosa which production Received: 07 March 2019 is not sustainable. -
Moniliophthora Perniciosa
Mares et al. BMC Microbiology (2016) 16:120 DOI 10.1186/s12866-016-0753-0 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Protein profile and protein interaction network of Moniliophthora perniciosa basidiospores Joise Hander Mares1, Karina Peres Gramacho1,3, Everton Cruz dos Santos1, André da Silva Santiago2, Edson Mário de Andrade Silva1, Fátima Cerqueira Alvim1 and Carlos Priminho Pirovani1* Abstract Background: Witches’ broom, a disease caused by the basidiomycete Moniliophthora perniciosa,isconsideredtobe the most important disease of the cocoa crop in Bahia, an area in the Brazilian Amazon, and also in the other countries where it is found. M. perniciosa germ tubes may penetrate into the host through intact or natural openings in the cuticle surface, in epidermis cell junctions, at the base of trichomes, or through the stomata. Despite its relevance to the fungal life cycle, basidiospore biology has not been extensively investigated. In this study, our goal was to optimize techniques for producing basidiospores for protein extraction, and to produce the first proteomics analysis map of ungerminated basidiospores. We then presented a protein interaction network by using Ustilago maydis as a model. Results: The average pileus area ranged from 17.35 to 211.24 mm2. The minimum and maximum productivity were 23,200 and 6,666,667 basidiospores per basidiome, respectively. The protein yield in micrograms per million basidiospores were approximately 0.161; 2.307, and 3.582 for germination times of 0, 2, and 4 h after germination, respectively. A total of 178 proteins were identified through mass spectrometry. These proteins were classified according to their molecular function and their involvement in biological processes such as cellular energy production, oxidative metabolism, stress, protein synthesis, and protein folding. -
<I>Moniliophthora Aurantiaca</I>
ISSN (print) 0093-4666 © 2012. Mycotaxon, Ltd. ISSN (online) 2154-8889 MYCOTAXON http://dx.doi.org/10.5248/120.493 Volume 120, pp. 493–503 April–June 2012 Moniliophthora aurantiaca sp. nov., a Polynesian species occurring in littoral forests Bradley R. Kropp1* & Steven Albee-Scott2 1Biology Department, 5305 Old Main Hill, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322 USA 2Wilbur L. Dungy Endowed Chair of the Sciences, Environmental Sciences, Jackson Community College, 2111 Emmons Road, Jackson, MI USA *Correspondence to: [email protected] Abstract — A new species of Moniliophthora is described from the Samoan Islands. The new species is characterized by its bright orange pileus and pale orange stipe and lamellae. It occurs commonly on woody debris in moist littoral forests and has not been found in upland forests. A phylogenetic analysis of nLSU and ITS sequences indicates that Moniliophthora aurantiaca has an affinity with the Central and South American members of the genus. Possible mechanisms for the dispersal of fungi from the Neotropics to the Samoan Islands are discussed. Key words — Agaricales, American Samoa, Crinipellis, Oceania, phylogeny Introduction The mycobiota of the Samoan Islands has received very little attention. What work that has been done consists of an inventory of the wood decay fungi and plant pathogens present in American Samoa (Brooks 2004, 2006) along with the recent description of an Inocybe species from the island of Ta’u (Kropp & Albee-Scott 2010). Our preliminary work on Samoan fungi indicates that the mycoflora of the islands is potentially quite rich and that a number of undescribed species is present. -
Justo Et Al 2010 Pluteaceae.Pdf
ARTICLE IN PRESS fungal biology xxx (2010) 1e20 journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/funbio Phylogeny of the Pluteaceae (Agaricales, Basidiomycota): taxonomy and character evolution Alfredo JUSTOa,*,1, Alfredo VIZZINIb,1, Andrew M. MINNISc, Nelson MENOLLI Jr.d,e, Marina CAPELARId, Olivia RODRıGUEZf, Ekaterina MALYSHEVAg, Marco CONTUh, Stefano GHIGNONEi, David S. HIBBETTa aBiology Department, Clark University, 950 Main St., Worcester, MA 01610, USA bDipartimento di Biologia Vegetale, Universita di Torino, Viale Mattioli 25, I-10125 Torino, Italy cSystematic Mycology & Microbiology Laboratory, USDA-ARS, B011A, 10300 Baltimore Ave., Beltsville, MD 20705, USA dNucleo de Pesquisa em Micologia, Instituto de Botanica,^ Caixa Postal 3005, Sao~ Paulo, SP 010631 970, Brazil eInstituto Federal de Educac¸ao,~ Ciencia^ e Tecnologia de Sao~ Paulo, Rua Pedro Vicente 625, Sao~ Paulo, SP 01109 010, Brazil fDepartamento de Botanica y Zoologıa, Universidad de Guadalajara, Apartado Postal 1-139, Zapopan, Jal. 45101, Mexico gKomarov Botanical Institute, 2 Popov St., St. Petersburg RUS-197376, Russia hVia Marmilla 12, I-07026 Olbia (OT), Italy iInstituto per la Protezione delle Piante, CNR Sezione di Torino, Viale Mattioli 25, I-10125 Torino, Italy article info abstract Article history: The phylogeny of the genera traditionally classified in the family Pluteaceae (Agaricales, Received 17 June 2010 Basidiomycota) was investigated using molecular data from nuclear ribosomal genes Received in revised form (nSSU, ITS, nLSU) and consequences for taxonomy and character evolution were evaluated. 16 September 2010 The genus Volvariella is polyphyletic, as most of its representatives fall outside the Pluteoid Accepted 26 September 2010 clade and shows affinities to some hygrophoroid genera (Camarophyllus, Cantharocybe). Corresponding Editor: Volvariella gloiocephala and allies are placed in a different clade, which represents the sister Joseph W. -
Biodiversity of Wood-Decay Fungi in Italy
AperTO - Archivio Istituzionale Open Access dell'Università di Torino Biodiversity of wood-decay fungi in Italy This is the author's manuscript Original Citation: Availability: This version is available http://hdl.handle.net/2318/88396 since 2016-10-06T16:54:39Z Published version: DOI:10.1080/11263504.2011.633114 Terms of use: Open Access Anyone can freely access the full text of works made available as "Open Access". Works made available under a Creative Commons license can be used according to the terms and conditions of said license. Use of all other works requires consent of the right holder (author or publisher) if not exempted from copyright protection by the applicable law. (Article begins on next page) 28 September 2021 This is the author's final version of the contribution published as: A. Saitta; A. Bernicchia; S.P. Gorjón; E. Altobelli; V.M. Granito; C. Losi; D. Lunghini; O. Maggi; G. Medardi; F. Padovan; L. Pecoraro; A. Vizzini; A.M. Persiani. Biodiversity of wood-decay fungi in Italy. PLANT BIOSYSTEMS. 145(4) pp: 958-968. DOI: 10.1080/11263504.2011.633114 The publisher's version is available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/11263504.2011.633114 When citing, please refer to the published version. Link to this full text: http://hdl.handle.net/2318/88396 This full text was downloaded from iris - AperTO: https://iris.unito.it/ iris - AperTO University of Turin’s Institutional Research Information System and Open Access Institutional Repository Biodiversity of wood-decay fungi in Italy A. Saitta , A. Bernicchia , S. P. Gorjón , E. -
Fungal Diversity in the Mediterranean Area
Fungal Diversity in the Mediterranean Area • Giuseppe Venturella Fungal Diversity in the Mediterranean Area Edited by Giuseppe Venturella Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in Diversity www.mdpi.com/journal/diversity Fungal Diversity in the Mediterranean Area Fungal Diversity in the Mediterranean Area Editor Giuseppe Venturella MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade • Manchester • Tokyo • Cluj • Tianjin Editor Giuseppe Venturella University of Palermo Italy Editorial Office MDPI St. Alban-Anlage 66 4052 Basel, Switzerland This is a reprint of articles from the Special Issue published online in the open access journal Diversity (ISSN 1424-2818) (available at: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/diversity/special issues/ fungal diversity). For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as indicated below: LastName, A.A.; LastName, B.B.; LastName, C.C. Article Title. Journal Name Year, Article Number, Page Range. ISBN 978-3-03936-978-2 (Hbk) ISBN 978-3-03936-979-9 (PDF) c 2020 by the authors. Articles in this book are Open Access and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. The book as a whole is distributed by MDPI under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND. Contents About the Editor .............................................. vii Giuseppe Venturella Fungal Diversity in the Mediterranean Area Reprinted from: Diversity 2020, 12, 253, doi:10.3390/d12060253 .................... 1 Elias Polemis, Vassiliki Fryssouli, Vassileios Daskalopoulos and Georgios I. -
Metabolites from Nematophagous Fungi and Nematicidal Natural Products from Fungi As Alternatives for Biological Control
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2016) 100:3813–3824 DOI 10.1007/s00253-015-7234-5 MINI-REVIEW Metabolites from nematophagous fungi and nematicidal natural products from fungi as alternatives for biological control. Part II: metabolites from nematophagous basidiomycetes and non-nematophagous fungi Thomas Degenkolb1 & Andreas Vilcinskas1,2 Received: 4 October 2015 /Revised: 29 November 2015 /Accepted: 2 December 2015 /Published online: 4 January 2016 # The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract In this second section of a two-part mini-re- Introduction view article, we introduce 101 further nematicidal and non-nematicidal secondary metabolites biosynthesized Metabolites from nematophagous basidiomycetes by nematophagous basidiomycetes or non- nematophagous ascomycetes and basidiomycetes. Sev- General remarks eral of these compounds have promising nematicidal activity and deserve further and more detailed analy- The chemical ecology of nematophagous fungi is still far from sis. Thermolides A and B, omphalotins, ophiobolins, understood. Little has been done to screen for metabolites in bursaphelocides A and B, illinitone A, pseudohalonectrins A nematophagous fungi, or nematicidal metabolites in other fun- and B, dichomitin B, and caryopsomycins A–Careex- gi, since the pioneering studies by Stadler and colleagues pub- cellent candidates or lead compounds for the develop- lished in the 1990s (Stadler et al. 1993a, b, 1994a, b, c, d). In ment of biocontrol strategies for phytopathogenic the first part of this review, we discussed 83 primary and nematodes. Paraherquamides, clonostachydiol, and secondary metabolites from nematophagous ascomycetes nafuredins offer promising leads for the development (Degenkolb and Vilcinskas, in press). In this second install- of formulations against the intestinal nematodes of ment, we consider nematicidal metabolites from ruminants. -
Bioluminescence in Mushroom and Its Application Potentials
Nigerian Journal of Science and Environment, Vol. 14 (1) (2016) BIOLUMINESCENCE IN MUSHROOM AND ITS APPLICATION POTENTIALS Ilondu, E. M.* and Okiti, A. A. Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria. *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]. Tel: 2348036758249. ABSTRACT Bioluminescence is a biological process through which light is produced and emitted by a living organism resulting from a chemical reaction within the body of the organism. The mechanism behind this phenomenon is an oxygen-dependent reaction involving substrates generally termed luciferin, which is catalyzed by one or more of an assortment of unrelated enzyme called luciferases. The history of bioluminescence in fungi can be traced far back to 382 B.C. when it was first noted by Aristotle in his early writings. It is the nature of bioluminescent mushrooms to emit a greenish light at certain stages in their life cycle and this light has a maximum wavelength range of 520-530 nm. Luminescence in mushroom has been hypothesized to attract invertebrates that aids in spore dispersal and testing for pollutants (ions of mercury) in water supply. The metabolites from luminescent mushrooms are effectively bioactive in anti-moulds, anti-bacteria, anti-virus, especially in inhibiting the growth of cancer cell and very useful in areas of biology, biotechnology and medicine as luminescent markers for developing new luminescent microanalysis methods. Luminescent mushroom is a novel area of research in the world which is beneficial to mankind especially with regards to environmental pollution monitoring and biomedical applications. Bioluminescence in fungi is a beautiful phenomenon to observe which should be of interest to Scientists of all endeavors. -
CBD First National Report
FIRST NATIONAL REPORT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY July 2010 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................... 3 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 4 2. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Geographic Profile .......................................................................................... 5 2.2 Climate Profile ...................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Population Profile ................................................................................................. 7 2.4 Economic Profile .................................................................................................. 7 3 THE BIODIVERSITY OF SERBIA .............................................................................. 8 3.1 Overview......................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Ecosystem and Habitat Diversity .................................................................... 8 3.3 Species Diversity ............................................................................................ 9 3.4 Genetic Diversity ............................................................................................. 9 3.5 Protected Areas .............................................................................................10