Ecuador 2019 Crime & Safety Report: Guayaquil

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ecuador 2019 Crime & Safety Report: Guayaquil Ecuador 2019 Crime & Safety Report: Guayaquil This is an annual report produced in conjunction with the Regional Security Office at the U.S. Consulate in Guayaquil, Ecuador. The current U.S. Department of State Travel Advisory at the date of this report’s publication assesses Ecuador at Level 1, indicating travelers should exercise normal precautions. Do not travel to Esmeraldas, Carchi, and Sucumbíos provinces due to crime. Overall Crime and Safety Situation U.S. Consulate General Guayaquil does not assume responsibility for the professional ability or integrity of the persons or firms appearing in this report. The ACS Unit cannot recommend a particular individual or location and assumes no responsibility for the quality of service provided. Review OSAC’s Ecuador-specific webpage for proprietary analytic reports, Consular Messages, and contact information. Crime Threats There is serious risk from crime in Guayaquil. Crime continues to present a severe problem. The number of home invasions and armed robberies decreased in 2018, but car thefts and homicides increased. Very low rates of apprehension and conviction of criminals – due to limited police and judicial resources – contribute to Ecuador’s high crime rate. While non-violent theft seems to be the most common problem U.S. citizens encounter in Guayaquil and Ecuador in general, violent crimes committed against official Americans and U.S. Citizens have increased. Travel in groups at all times. Pick-pocketing, purse-snatching, robbery, bag-slashing, and hotel room theft are the most common types of non-violent crimes committed against U.S. citizens. These incidents occur throughout Ecuador though there was a slight decrease in 2018. Pickpockets and other petty thieves are particularly active in tourist areas, airports, restaurants, bus terminals, public markets, and grocery stores, and on public transportation and crowded streets. Criminals frequently target backpackers and travelers carrying laptop bags for robbery. Thieves often distract their victims, sometimes by purposefully spilling liquid on a victim and pretending to help clean it up (condiment scam), while accomplices snatch the victim’s bag or pick the victim’s pocket. To lower risk from these or other non-violent crimes, leave valuables in a safe place or do not travel with them. Never carry more than you are willing to lose, and never carry anything you consider priceless or irreplaceable. Make use of hotel safes when available, avoid wearing obviously expensive jewelry or designer clothing, and carry only the necessary cash or credit cards on each outing. Stay alert to pickpockets when in crowds and when taking public transportation, and be conscious of distractions created to target tourists. Maintain a low profile and do not advertise if you are from the United States. 1 Violent crime rates have fluctuated over the last few years, with U.S. citizens being victims of crimes, including homicides, armed assaults, robberies, sexual assaults, and home invasions. Armed or violent robberies occur throughout Ecuador. Many travelers are victims of robbery after using ATMs or when exiting banks. Avoid withdrawing large amounts of cash at one time from banks and ATMs, and use ATMs in protected indoor areas, like well-guarded shopping malls. In some cases, robbers have used motorcycles to approach their victims and flee the scene. Robbers have also victimized tourists at gunpoint on beaches and along hiking trails. Increasing numbers of U.S. citizens have fallen victim to fraud related to their credit/debit cards. “Skimming” is most likely to occur in restaurants, bars, and, at times, hotels, where the skimmer takes the victim's card out of the owner’s view. Take your credit/debit card to the register, and never let the card out of your sight. Pay for items in cash whenever possible, and only use credit cards at larger establishments, such as hotels. Frequently monitor bank accounts and credit card statements. For more information, review OSAC’s Report, The Overseas Traveler’s Guide to ATM Skimmers & Fraud. If you fall victim to express kidnapping and/or robbery, cooperation usually results in the best outcome; nothing material is as valuable as your life. Incidents of sexual assault and rape have increased, including in well-traveled tourist areas. Criminals generally target women who are alone, and use alcohol or incapacitating drugs to rob and/or sexually assault unsuspecting tourists. These so-called date-rape drugs, most often rohypnol and scopolamine, disorient the victim and can cause prolonged unconsciousness and serious medical problems. To lower risk of sexual assault, travel in groups, do not leave food/drink unattended in public places, and never accept a drink from a stranger. For more information, review OSAC’s Report, Shaken: The Don’ts of Alcohol Abroad. Very few U.S. citizens have been victims of murder in Ecuador (four from 2012-2016 and two each in 2017 and 2018). The Ecuadorian government has an emergency hotline, 1-800-DELITO (1-800-335486), to inform police about murders or contract killings. Other Areas of Concern Exercise extreme caution in downtown Guayaquil and the southern part of the city. Tourist sites – the Christ statue (Sagrado Corazon de Jesus) on Cerro del Carmen, the Malecon 2000, and Las Peñas – though well patrolled by police, are targeted by criminals hoping to prey on unsuspecting tourists. There have also been reports of armed robberies at restaurants in the Urdesa and Samborondon areas. U.S. government personnel may travel to the northern bank of the Napo River in Sucumbíos, where tourist lodges are located, in an area approximately four miles wide. The U.S. Government prohibits all other personnel travel to the northern border area, including to the provinces of Sucumbíos, Carchi, and Esmeraldas, without prior permission. 2 Transportation-Safety Situation For more information, review OSAC’s Report, Security in Transit: Airplanes, Public Transport, and Overnights. Road Safety and Road Conditions Although some of Ecuador’s roads and highways have greatly improved in recent years, road travel can be dangerous, especially at night. Some roads are in poor condition or affected by heavy rains and mudslides. Mountain roads may lack safety features (e.g. crash barriers, guardrails). Heavy fog frequently makes conditions more treacherous. Highways often lack markings, lighting, and signage. In addition, slow-moving buses and trucks frequently stop in the middle of the road unexpectedly. In the countryside, livestock moves along roads or grazes on roadsides. Pedestrians frequently use roads, as sidewalks are often missing. Road travel after dark is especially hazardous in all areas of the country. Driving practices differ from U.S. standards. Drivers often disobey traffic laws and signals. Buses stop without warning to pick up/drop off passengers. Drivers often turn from any lane, and rarely yield to pedestrians/cyclists. You could encounter intoxicated drivers; chances of a drunk-driving accident are higher on weekends and local holidays. On the coast in particular, many vehicles are in poorly condition, and breakdowns are common. For more information on self-driving, review OSAC’s Report Driving Overseas: Best Practices. Police may take any driver involved in an accident where injuries are involved or the driver does not have insurance into custody, even the driver is not at fault. If injuries or damages are serious, the driver may face criminal charges. To avoid carjacking or theft from a vehicle stopped at an intersection, should keep doors locked and windows rolled up at all times. “Smash and grabs” occur when thieves break into parked vehicles, but have also occurred in slow-moving or stopped traffic, particularly targeting women driving alone. Public Transportation Conditions In Guayaquil, security on public transportation is a major concern. U.S. government employees may not hailing taxis from the street, an action that raises your susceptibility to the threat of secuestro express (express kidnapping). Secuestro express presents a significant safety concern, especially in Guayaquil (but also in Manta and with increasing regularity in Quito). Shortly after the passenger enters a taxi, armed accomplices of the driver typically intercepted the vehicle, threaten passengers with weapons, rob passengers of their personal belongings, and force victims to withdraw money from ATMs. Increasingly, victims have been beaten or sexually assaulted during these incidents. Call known taxi services by phone, or use a service affiliated with major hotels. Registered taxis are yellow, display matching unit numbers on their windshields and doors, feature a taxi cooperative name on the door, and have orange license plates. Express kidnappers have victimized passengers even in taxis that meet these criteria. 3 Intra- and inter-city bus passengers are often targets of crime, including robbery and sexual assault. Numerous bus accidents occur every year in Ecuador. Many buses are overcrowded, in poor condition, and lack seatbelts and other safety features. Armed criminals have boarded local city buses and robbed passengers of valuables. There have been instances in which criminals block routes between cities, forcing a bus to stop and then boarding to rob passengers. Thieves often steal luggage stowed below the bus, in overhead racks, or at a traveler’s feet. Aviation/Airport Conditions Aviation is generally the safest mode of travel within Ecuador. However, armed robbers have targeted arriving passengers by following them from the airports in Quito and Guayaquil. Examples include multiple vehicles that cut off and intercept a victim, as well as a single motorcycle rider who robs a victim getting out of a car. The perpetrators appear to focus on travelers returning from overseas trips laden with gifts and large amounts of cash. Terrorism Threat Local, Regional, and International Terrorism Threats/Concerns There is moderate risk from terrorism in Guayaquil. Terrorism in Ecuador is a rare occurrence. Attacks in Ecuador have traditionally involved small domestic organizations as well as Colombian dissident groups (FARC and ELN) operating within Ecuador's borders.
Recommended publications
  • Lifetime Likelihood of Victimization
    U. S. Department of Justice I Bureau of Justice Statistics I Lifetime Likelihood of Victimization by Herbert Koppel people's perception of the meaning of BJS Analyst March 1987 annual rates with respect to their own The Bureau of Justice Statistics lives. If the Earth revolved around the This report provides estimates of the National Crime Survey provides sun in 180 days, all of our annual crime likelihood that a person will become a annual victimization rates based rates would be halved, but we would not victim of crime during his or her life- on counts of the number of crimes be safer. time, or that a household will be vic- reported and not reported to timized during a 20-year period. This police in the United States. These Calculating lifetime victimization rates contrasts with the conventional use of a rates are based on interviews 1-year period in measuring crime and twice a year with about 101,000 For this report, lifetime likelihoods criminal victimization. Most promi- persons in approximately 49,000 of victimization were calculated from nently, the National Crime Survey nationally representative NCS annual victimization rates and life (NCS) surveys a sample of U.S. house- households. Those annual rates, tables published by the National Center holds and publishes annual victimization while of obvious utility to for Health statistics.% The probability rates, and the FBI's Uniform Crime policymakers, researchers, and that a person will be victimized at a Reports (UCR) provide annual rates of statisticians, do not convey to particular age basically depends upon crimes reported to the police.
    [Show full text]
  • Lifetime Likelihood of Victimization
    .,. u.s, Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics Lifetime Likelihood of Victimization by Het'bert Koppel people's perception of the meaning of BJS Analyst Mat'ch 1987 annual ra tes with respect to their own The Bureau of Justice Statistics lives. If the Earth revolved around the This report provides estimates of the National Crime Survey provides sun in 180 days, all of our annual crime likelihood that a person will become a annual victimization rates based rates would be halved, but we would not victim of crime during his or her life­ on counts of the number of crimes be safer. time, or that a household will be vic­ reported and not reported to timized during a 20-year pel'iod. This police in the United States. These Calculating lifetime victimization fates contrasts with the conventional use of a rates are based on interviews I-year period in measuring crime and twice a year with about lOl,OOO For this report, lifetime likelihoods criminal victimization. Most promi­ persons in approximately 49,000 of victimization were calculated from nently, the National Crime Survey na tionally representative NCS annual victimi.zation rates and life (NCS) surveys a sample of U.S. house­ households. Those annual ra ces, tables published by the National Center 2 holds and publishes annual victimization while of obvious utility to for Health Statistics. The probability rates, and the FBI's Uniform Crime policymakel's, researchers, and that a person will be victimized at a Reports (UCR) provide annual rates of statisticians, do not convey to particular age basically depends upon crimes reported to the police.
    [Show full text]
  • The Truth About Voter Fraud 7 Clerical Or Typographical Errors 7 Bad “Matching” 8 Jumping to Conclusions 9 Voter Mistakes 11 VI
    Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law is a non-partisan public policy and law institute that focuses on fundamental issues of democracy and justice. Our work ranges from voting rights to redistricting reform, from access to the courts to presidential power in the fight against terrorism. A sin- gular institution—part think tank, part public interest law firm, part advocacy group—the Brennan Center combines scholarship, legislative and legal advocacy, and communications to win meaningful, measurable change in the public sector. ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER’S VOTING RIGHTS AND ELECTIONS PROJECT The Voting Rights and Elections Project works to expand the franchise, to make it as simple as possible for every eligible American to vote, and to ensure that every vote cast is accurately recorded and counted. The Center’s staff provides top-flight legal and policy assistance on a broad range of election administration issues, including voter registration systems, voting technology, voter identification, statewide voter registration list maintenance, and provisional ballots. © 2007. This paper is covered by the Creative Commons “Attribution-No Derivs-NonCommercial” license (see http://creativecommons.org). It may be reproduced in its entirety as long as the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law is credited, a link to the Center’s web page is provided, and no charge is imposed. The paper may not be reproduced in part or in altered form, or if a fee is charged, without the Center’s permission.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015/16 MIDTERM REPORT Dear Friends
    OFFICE OF THE STATE’S ATTORNEY FOR BALTIMORE CITY 2015/16 MIDTERM REPORT Dear Friends, We have reached the halfway point of my first term as State’s Attorney for Baltimore City. Much has changed in Baltimore since the beginning of my administration—we have a new Mayor, a new City Council, a new Police Commissioner, and most importantly, a new approach to fighting crime. When I took office, I promised to repair the broken relationship between the community and law enforcement. I promised to tackle violent crime. And lastly, I promised to reform our criminal justice system using a holistic approach to prosecution. As I look back at all that we’ve accomplished in just two short years, I’m proud to report that we have made significant strides toward fulfilling those three promises: Driving Down Violent Crime • We convicted 433 felony rapists, child molesters and other sexual offenders including 5-time serial rapist Nelson Clifford. • Our Felony Trial Units secured over 5,400 convictions with an average conviction rate of 93 percent. • We secured major convictions in several high profile homicide cases including multiple Public Enemy #1s designated by the Baltimore Police Department (BPD), Bishop Heather Cook who tragically struck and killed Thomas Palermo in 2014, and all of the shooters responsible for the death of one-year-old Carter Scott. • We created a Gun Violence Enforcement Division staffed by prosecutors and BPD detectives co-located at our headquarters that focuses in on gun violence. • We developed the Arrest Alert System, designed by the new Crime Strategies Unit, to alert prosecutors immediately when a targeted individual is arrested for any reason.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Injury Exclusion: Is the Slashing of Wrists Necessary? Donald J
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The University of Akron The University of Akron IdeaExchange@UAkron Akron Tax Journal Akron Law Journals 1997 Personal Injury Exclusion: Is the Slashing of Wrists Necessary? Donald J. Zahn Please take a moment to share how this work helps you through this survey. Your feedback will be important as we plan further development of our repository. Follow this and additional works at: https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akrontaxjournal Part of the Tax Law Commons Recommended Citation Zahn, Donald J. (1997) "Personal Injury Exclusion: Is the Slashing of Wrists Necessary?," Akron Tax Journal: Vol. 13 , Article 5. Available at: https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akrontaxjournal/vol13/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Akron Law Journals at IdeaExchange@UAkron, the institutional repository of The nivU ersity of Akron in Akron, Ohio, USA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Akron Tax Journal by an authorized administrator of IdeaExchange@UAkron. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Zahn: Personal Injury Exclusion PERSONAL INJURY EXCLUSION: IS THE SLASHING OF WRISTS NECESSARY? by DONALD J. ZAHN * "Capital return... in tax accounting,payments received by taxpayer which rep- resent the individual's cost or capitaland hence not taxable as income.' I. INTRODUCTION What do damage awards really represent? Does a damage award stem- ming from a personal injury lawsuit or settlement compensate the individual for lost capabilities? Does a damage award confer a windfall upon that individual? The predecessor statute of section 104(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 19862 and the policy behind that statute equate damage awards to the wronged individual as a return of capital.3 As years passed, the courts, as well as Congress refined the return of capital concept, expanding the concept to include within its boundaries all forms of personal injury recoveries.
    [Show full text]
  • BRONX MAN INDICTED for CARRYING out MULTIPLE UNPROVOKED SLASHINGS in the BRONX Defendant Attacked Eight Men Within Four Days
    www.bronxda.nyc.gov 198 EAST 161ST STREET www.facebook.com/BronxDistrictAttorney DARCEL D. CLARK BRONX, N.Y. 10451 www.twitter.com/BronxDAClark DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BRONX COUNTY (718) 590-2234 11-2021 For Immediate Release April 2, 2021 BRONX MAN INDICTED FOR CARRYING OUT MULTIPLE UNPROVOKED SLASHINGS IN THE BRONX Defendant Attacked Eight Men Within Four Days Bronx District Attorney Darcel D. Clark today announced that a Bronx man has been indicted on a total of 66 charges--including multiple counts of Attempted Murder, Assault and Robbery charges--for viciously slashing and assaulting eight people in the Bronx. District Attorney Clark said, “The defendant, who allegedly has ties to the Bloods, attacked nine people in the Bronx during a span of four days, slashing most of them in the neck. The defendant mostly targeted men over the age of 50, with the two oldest victims being ages 65 and 75 years old. We will seek justice for the victims in these unprovoked attacks; and for Bronx residents who have the right to walk freely in their communities without fearing for their safety.” District Attorney Clark said the defendant, JayQawn Byers, 22, of 4331 Byron Avenue, was arraigned today on 66 counts, including seven counts of Attempted Murder in the second degree, 15 counts of first-degree Assault, 16 counts of second-degree Assault, seven counts of third- degree Assault, Attempted Assault in the third degree, two counts of first-degree Robbery, two counts of Attempted Robbery in the first degree, second and third-degree Robbery, Attempted Robbery in the second and third degree, fourth-degree Grand Larceny, Attempted Grand Larceny in the fourth degree, Petit Larceny, Attempted Petit Larceny, fifth-degree Criminal Possession of Stolen Property and seven counts of fourth-degree Criminal Possession of a Weapon before Bronx Supreme Court Justice Michael Gross.
    [Show full text]
  • California Crime Victims for Alternatives to the Death Penalty
    f r o m VoicesCalifornia Crime Victims for Alternatives to the Death Penalty The people you will meet in this booklet have endured unimaginable, heartbreaking loss: the murder of a child, a parent, a sibling, a friend. Despite all efforts, their wounds may never entirely heal. Yet they choose to speak. They choose to raise their voices, individually and collectively against the death penalty and to share their most personal and painful stories of loss. Why? Because all too often, the loved ones of murder victims find that other people purport to speak for them, while their own voices are stilled. They are invoked as a reason to support the death penalty because it is assumed that all victims’ families want executions. Yet, for so many victims’ survivors—like those featured in this booklet—the death penalty solves nothing and can even perpetuate their suffering. California Crime Victims for Alternatives to the Death Penalty (CCV) is a coalition of murder victims’ families, friends, and loved ones who oppose the death penalty. They have lost a family member to murder in California, or are California residents who have lost someone to murder in another state. Members of CCV oppose the death penalty for many different reasons. Some have been lifelong opponents, while others formed their views only after being personally impacted by murder. Some CCV members were supporters of capital punishment, until they had to endure the pain and suffering associated with a long, drawn-out death penalty case. Now they feel that greater attention should be focused on the needs of victims and helping them heal.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the COURT of CRIMINAL APPEALS of TENNESSEE at JACKSON September 1, 2020 Session
    11/30/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 1, 2020 Session JOHN N. MOFFITT v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Henderson County No. 13-123-1 Roy B. Morgan, Jr., Judge ___________________________________ No. W2020-00594-CCA-R3-ECN ___________________________________ A Henderson County jury convicted the Petitioner, John N. Moffitt, of reckless aggravated assault, as a lesser included offense of aggravated assault, for slashing the victim’s arm with a pocketknife following a property dispute. State v. John N. Moffitt, No. W2014- 02388-CCA-R3-CD, 2016 WL 369379, at *1 (Tenn. Crim. App. Jan. 29, 2016), perm. app. denied (Tenn. June 24, 2016). This Court affirmed his conviction on direct appeal; however, this Court also reduced the amount of restitution that the trial court ordered and remanded the case to the trial court to determine the amount of restitution that the Petitioner could pay. Id. On March 10, 2020, the Petitioner, acting pro se, filed a petition for writ of error coram nobis, arguing that his conviction for reckless aggravated assault was “an illegal and unconstitutional conviction” because the indictment failed to allege “recklessly,” which the Petitioner contends is a “required mental state indicating a lesser kind of culpability” than that required for aggravated assault. The Petitioner alleged that he was entitled to due process tolling of the statute of limitations because he was “totally unaware of the fact about [sic] the illegal and unconstitutional conviction.” The coram nobis court summarily dismissed the petition, finding that it was time-barred and that the Petitioner’s allegations did not constitute new evidence and thus did not toll the statute of limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • Cargo Theft Report
    Cargo Theft Report Applying the Brakes to Road Cargo Crime in Europe Public version excluding Appendix D (Europol Restricted) The Hague, 2009 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Background 3 2.1. Aims and Objectives 4 2.2. Definitions 4 2.3. Scope 5 3. Nature of Cargo Theft 6 4. Situation in Working Group Member States 11 4.1. Belgium 11 4.2. France 12 4.3. UK 13 4.4. Spain 15 4.5. The Netherlands 17 5. Summary 20 6. Recommendations 21 Appendix A - Modi Operandi 25 Appendix B - Prevention Measures 27 Appendix C - Minimum Standards for Response to and Investigation of Road Freight Crime 32 Appendix D - EUROPOL Restricted Document (not included; available for law enforcement through Europol National Units) - 1 - EUROPOL The Hague, March 2009 File nº EDOC #383783 1. Introduction The European Union (EU) is built on the fundamental principal of free movement of people and goods. This principal has seen the European economy grow, providing new business opportunities across the whole of Europe. The same business opportunities have been seized by organised crime groups, who see the ever increasing value of goods moved around the European Union as ‘easy pickings’ and both an income source in its own right or as a funding source for other criminal activity such as drug dealing. The majority of freight transport in the EU takes place on the road, therefore the significance of road freight transport for the economy of the EU and the need to protect it is obvious. Consequently road freight will be the focus of this report, and the report does not cover issues such as seaport and airport security.
    [Show full text]
  • Defaming the Dead
    Defaming the Dead Defaming the Dead DON HERZOG New Haven and London Published with assistance from the foundation established in memory of Calvin Chapin of the Class of 1788, Yale College. Copyright © 2017 by Don Herzog. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. An online version of this work is available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License through Michigan Publishing, the digital publishing arm of the University of Michigan Library. It can be accessed at http://hdl .handle.net/2027.42/118195. Yale University Press books may be purchased in quantity for educational, business, or promotional use. For information, please e-mail [email protected] (U.S. office) or [email protected] (U.K. office). Set in Minion type by Integrated Publishing Solutions. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Control Number: 2016947904 ISBN: 978-0-300-22154-1 (hardcover : alk. paper) A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. The Woody Guthrie lyrics in chapter 5 are from “Plane Wreck at Los Gatos” (“Deportee”); words by Woody Guthrie, music by Martin Hoffman; WGP/TRO-© Copyright 1961 (renewed), 1963 (renewed), Woody Guthrie Publications, Inc. & Ludlow Music, Inc., New York, NY; administered by Ludlow Music, Inc. Used by Permission. This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper).
    [Show full text]
  • Jan 17 Criminal
    LEVEL 6 - UNIT 3 – CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS – JANUARY 2017 Note to Candidates and Tutors: The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students should have included in their answers to the January 2017 examinations. The suggested answers set out a response that a good (merit/distinction) candidate would have provided. The suggested answers do not for all questions set out all the points which students may have included in their responses to the questions. Students will have received credit, where applicable, for other points not addressed by the suggested answers. Students and tutors should review the suggested answers in conjunction with the question papers and the Chief Examiners’ reports which provide feedback on student performance in the examination. SECTION A Question 1 In some situations, a defendant (D) may not have completed the Actus Reus (AR) of a substantive offence, but can still be liable for an inchoate offence. Inchoate offences have been described as incomplete offences when really they are offences in their own right which anticipate a complete offence. Inchoate offences refer to those offences where D has not actually committed the substantive crime but has either made an attempt to do so, or has entered into a conspiracy with someone else to do so. Inchoate offences have a role in crime prevention or deterrence and are designed to allow for liability to be imposed on those who are in the preparatory stages of committing an offence, without waiting for the substantive offence to be committed.
    [Show full text]
  • Cargo Theft Report SUPPLY CHAIN INTELLIGENCE CENTER EMEA
    Q2-2019 Cargo Theft Report SUPPLY CHAIN INTELLIGENCE CENTER EMEA Introduction The SensiGuard™ Supply Chain Intelligence Center (SCIC) continues to collect data to provide a clear picture of cargo theft within the EMEA region to our partners. In the second quarter of 2019, the SCIC has been able to collect a total of 1,423 incidents. This is lower than Q2-2018, when there were 1,739 incidents collected, a decrease of 18%. It is important to highlight that this is not because the cargo theft rate has decreased, but because some of our data-sharing partners did not have their data available when the report was being written. This data will become available at a later date and the SCIC will include this in future reports. As in previous quarters, the following heat map shows that the majority of reported incidents are confined to countries in Western Europe. However, this quarter the SCIC was able to record various incidents in Russia, with the help of a new partner in this part of the region. The SCIC would like to highlight that the countries that are featured in this report are much better at reporting cargo theft incidents than the ones that are not mentioned. It is important to point out that this is not because cargo theft is not occurring in these areas. sensitech.com Year on Year Comparison of Total Cargo This is lower than Q2-2018, when the total value was Crime €39,509,371 and the average value was €68,002. In Q2-2018, a much higher number of incidents recorded had a value Below, the SCIC presents a Year on Year comparison for attributed with 33.4%.
    [Show full text]