DOCSLIB.ORG

MIGRATE Has a Focus on Contributing to the Project Coordinator: Progressive Move to a Low Carbon Future Within Tennet Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MIGRATE Has a Focus on Contributing to the Project Coordinator: Progressive Move to a Low Carbon Future Within Tennet Europe THE BENEFITS PROJECT PARTNERS • MIGRATE has a focus on contributing to the Project Coordinator: progressive move to a low carbon future within TenneT Europe. The project will facilitate the integration of large scale low carbon technologies, such Project Partners: as wind and solar renewable generation. This will Estonia – TTU, Elering provide a positive environmental impact resulting in the reduction of CO2 levels. Iceland – LANDSNET Finland – FINGRID • MIGRATE will support Transmission System Germany – TenneT, amprion, Leibniz Universität Hannover, TU Berlin Operators by providing economic solutions which MIGRATE make use of their existing infrastructure. Scotland (UK) – SP Energy Networks England (UK) – University of Manchester • The project results from MIGRATE are supported Ireland – EIRGRID Group, University College of Dublin by free market players, technologies supporting the grid connections, power system monitoring Netherlands – TenneT, Delft University of Technology CONTACT US tools to measure the distance of instability and France – Schneider Electric, ECOLE NATIONALE SUPERIEURE DES ARTS protection mechanisms. These results will help to ET METIERS, RTE validate new business opportunities that work towards increased Switzerland – ETH Zürich www.spenergynetworks.co.uk benefits to customers and create new business and employment Slovenia – ELES, University of Ljubljana, ELECTROINSTITUT MILAN VIDMAR opportunities within Europe’s economy. Italy – TERNA S.P.A., ENSIEL facebook.com/SPEnergyNetworks • MIGRATE is supporting innovative approaches Spain – RED Eléctrica De España, Circe twitter.com/SPEnergyNetwork that are helping to ensure a safe, reliable performance of the electricity network when A more detailed description of the project members can be found at: [email protected] generated from low carbon technologies. www.h2020-migrate.eu/members.html WHO ARE WE? MIGRATE SAFEGUARDING THE STABILITY OF A LOW CARBON NETWORK We are SP Energy Networks, part of the Iberdrola group, leaders By 2020, we expect a number of transmission in sustainable innovation. As a Transmission and Distribution systems to experience a high penetration of power electronic interfaced generators Network Operator (DNO) we keep electricity flowing to homes MIGRATE’s Work Package 2 has been investigating how we can monitor We have deployed the world’s first live trial of Wide Area Monitoring, as a result of the growing uptake of low and businesses throughout Central and Southern Scotland, and forecast Key Performance Indictors (KPIs) that will indicate the Protection and Control in the Icelandic network to demonstrate solutions to North Wales, Merseyside, Cheshire and North Shropshire. carbon technologies, such as wind and solar generation. At certain times, this growing penetration could mean system stability. maintain stability in low inertia networks. that networks are only supplied by low carbon technologies. We do this through the The two factors we have been studying has been Area Inertia and This approach has addressed the following issues: network of overhead Short-Circuit Capacity (or Grid Strength), where we have produced lines and underground This will result in: tools to monitor and forecast these KPIs. • Frequency containment within load and generation shed limits cables which we own • Angle swing stability, islanding avoidance and islanding ride-through and maintain. • Dynamic stability issues • Excessive Rate of Change of Frequency (RoCoF) • A need to upgrade protection schemes Our three regulated Area Inertia – MIGRATE has identified that power systems electricity licences are: • A need to address resulting power quality degradation can no longer be considered to act as a single centre Synchrophasor-based wide area (including harmonic propagation) of inertia, but should rather be considered as several control is operating live in the SP Transmission (SPT) interconnected clusters of regional inertia. Icelandic grid, in a world-first European Transmission Operators (TO) have come together to address SP Distribution (SPD) practical approach for dealing these challenges and propose solutions to progressively adjust with the problems of weakly SP Manweb (SPM) transmission systems accordingly. Short-Circuit Capacity – MIGRATE has identified coupled areas with low inertia. that there is a growing difference between the system Our aim is to deliver a safe and MIGRATE is the only TO-led project under the European H2020 framework, The wide area control approach supported by Academics and Industrial partners. There have been impedance during a fault and at near nominal voltage reliable electricity supply 24 hours conditions. delivers triggering signals to a day, 365 days a year whilst investigations into a number of key factors stemming from the transition responding services to the providing exceptional value for to the low carbon network, including the impact on stability, protection required locations, in proportion Iceland: World’s first live trial money for all customers and and harmonics in an electricity network with high penetration of power to the changes in the system of wide area monitoring, contributing to a more electronics. state, in less than 0.5s from protection and control sustainable future. SP Energy Networks is leading Work Package 2 the disturbance. (Wide Area Monitoring, Protection and Control) as A generalised system-responsive approach was taken that can readily be part of the project consortium. adapted to other systems, where the measured frequency and phase angle relating to regions of the grid drive a locational and proportional response. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • North Atlantic Energy Network January 2016
    North Atlantic Energy Network January 2016 Orkustofnun (OS) - National Energy Authority of Iceland Norges Arktiske Universitet (UiT) - The Arctic University of Norway Energy Styrelsen - Danish Energy Agency Jarðfeingi - Faroese Earth and Energy Directorate Shetland Islands Council - Economic Development Service Greenland Innovation Centre 1 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The aim of the North Atlantic Energy Network project was to investigate how isolated energy systems in the North Atlantic can be connected to Norway and Greenland to form an electrical grid in the North Atlantic. Representatives of Greenland, Iceland, Faroe Islands, Shetland and Norway met in Copenhagen in the end of February 2015 to formulate how to tackle this question. Each country documented its status regarding energy production and potentials in the fields of renewable energy and the technological aspects were investigated. Greenland has a big hydropower and solar energy potential, which is not known in detail. Further work is needed to map the potentials. Due to lack of infrastructure and experience a cable connection between Greenland and the neighbouring countries is not realistic in the nearest future. It is technically possible to connect all of the neighbouring countries around Iceland with subsea cables. Iceland now produces about 18 TWh of electricity per year and could have the potential to double the production from geothermal and hydropower alone. There are many unclear aspects that need to be investigated further to draw a full picture of the pros and cons of interconnectors from Iceland. The legal and regulatory framework must be in place before a project of this kind can be realized and extensive grid reinforcements are needed to support export through a cable at a single connection point in Iceland.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Participation and Transparency in Power Grid Planning
    Public Participation and Transparency in Power Grid Planning Recommendations from the BESTGRID Project Handbook – Part 1 BESTGRID PARTNERS Transmission System Operator (TSO) Partners Natagora asbl www.natagora.be 50Hertz Transmission GmbH Julien Taymans (Waterloo-Braine l'Alleud project) www.50hertz.com [email protected] Dr Dirk Manthey, [email protected] Phone: +32 (0) 81 390 720 Phone: +49 (0) 30 5150 3419 98 rue Nanon, B-5000 Namur Eichenstr. 3A, D-12435 Berlin German Environment Aid (DUH) Elia System Operator NV www.duh.de www.stevin.be Liv Becker (Suedlink / Bertikow-Pasewalk) Jeroen Mentens (Stevin project) [email protected] [email protected] Phone: +49 (0) 30 2400 867 98 Phone: +32 (0) 2 546 7957 Hackescher Markt 4, D-10178 Berlin Christophe Coq (Waterloo-Braine l'Alleud project) Germanwatch e.V. [email protected] www.germanwatch.org Phone: +32 (0) 2 382 2334 Leon Monnoyerkaai 3, B-1000 Brussels Rotraud Hänlein, [email protected] Phone: +49 (0) 30 2888 356 83 National Grid Stresemannstr. 72, D-10963 Berlin www.nemo-link.com International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Phil Pryor, [email protected] www.iiasa.ac.at Phone: +44 (0)7795 641 431 Warwick Technology Park, Gallows Hill, Warwick, Joanne Linnerooth-Bayer, [email protected] UK-CV346DA Dr Nadejda Komendantova, [email protected] Phone: +43 (0) 676 83 807 285 TenneT TSO GmbH Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg www.suedlink.tennet.eu Marius Strecker, [email protected] Naturschutzbund Deutschland (NABU) Phone: +49 (0) 921 50740 4094 www.nabu.de Bernecker Str.
    [Show full text]
  • Facts and Figures 2019
    Contact and imprint Facts Publisher Design 50Hertz Transmission GmbH Heimrich & Hannot GmbH and Figures Heidestrasse 2 10557 Berlin Images T +49 30 5150 0 50Hertz 2019 F +49 30 5150 2199 Jan Pauls info@ 50 hertz.com Frank Wölffing Board of Management Printing Stefan Kapferer (CEO) PocketPlaner Dr. Frank Golletz (CTO) FP Werbung GmbH Dr. Dirk Biermann (CMO) Marco Nix (CFO) Sylvia Borcherding (CHRO) 50hertz.com For a successful energy transition in a sustainable world You can find our sustainability report online at csr.50hertz.com enmark About us Our tasks nerginet Key figures In the north and east of Germany, cleswig-olstein we operate the high voltage grid Lubmin Value TenneT reliably ensuring electricity supply Market facilitation – Gstrow GRID-RELATED KEY FIGURES WESTE for around 18 million people. EI CETE NORTHE 2 We are part of the amburg EI CETE Grid area 109,702 km TenneT European integrated Our grid with voltage levels of 150 kilo- Our locations Total lenghts of lines market. (equivalent to power 10,490 km volt (kV), 220 kV and 380 kV extends P circuit length) thereof overhead lines 380 kV 7,250 km over a circuit length of 10,490 km. 50Hertz Netzquartier Eastern Regional Centre Lower axony Poland CET We deliver the (Headquarters) Sigmund-Bergmann-Str. 1 EI CETE thereof overhead lines 220 kV 2,607 km 50ert-Netquartier Heidestrasse 2 03222 Lübbenau/ BerlinCarlottenburg Neuenagen At our eleven locations, over 1,100 infrastructure of bei Berlin thereof sea cables 220 kV 290 km 10557 Berlin Spreewald employees ensure that electricity the future TenneT Wolmirstedt thereof sea cables 150 kV 270 km flows around the clock in Berlin, Service location Röhrsdorf Trusteeship – Northern Regional Centre thereof underground cables 73 km Brandenburg, Hamburg, Mecklen- WESTE Lbbenaupreewald Substations and switching We transparently integrate Rostocker Chaussee 18 Southern Regional Centre EI CETE 74 burg-Western Pomerania, Saxony, stations (number) renewable energies 18273 Güstrow Zentrales Umspannwerk 8 Saxony-Anhalt and Thuringia.
    [Show full text]
  • Electricity Systems and Markets) EDF R&D
    European system with an efficient coordinated use of flexibilities for the integration of a large share of RES Vera Silva Research program director « Electricity systems and markets) EDF R&D EU-SysFlex overall objective EU SysFlex objective is to contribute to developing a market design and regulation framework able to foster the development of innovative flexibility approaches to address the technical shortfalls of a European system with high RES. These innovative approaches cover both the technical capability for providing the right flexibilities and system services and the ability of TSOs to integrate these into system and network operation. EU-SysFlex will make a major contribution to a cost effective system transformation to meet EU world leading RES objectives Three pillars of EUSysFlex approach System needs TSO driven Whole system driven Technical shortfalls Economic shortfalls Market driving innovation to respond to system needs Demonstrations/ Scalability Market design and Replicability/ TSO Services/ Products/ enhancement & operations simulation Procurement/Remuneration regulation evolution Flexibility Roadmap – Implementation and exploitation Scalability and System Implementation Exploitation of results replicatbility benefits Roadmap business creation EU SysFlex will provide a significant improvement of EU innovation capacity by combining “top-down” and “bottom- up” approaches to flexibility enabled by a strong consortium - Cost effective enhancement of flexibility and system services capability - new approaches and tools
    [Show full text]
  • Methodology of Comparison 2013
    METHODOLOGY OF COMPARISON 2013 Comparative Analysis of Sustainability Performance Methodological Remarks Convinced that a comparison of environmental, social and governance performance is of interest, not only to the Company itself, but also to its stakeholders, certain comparisons between Terna’s results and those of other com- panies are included in the 2013 Sustainability Report, as was the case in the preceding three years. Listed below are the main criteria adopted in the analysis, as an introduction to the reading and interpretation of the comparisons of individual indicators in the Report: • three panels of companies were identified: an industry panel, composed of the European transmission system operators and the major extra-European operators in terms of kilometres of lines managed; and two multi- industry panels, the first relative to large Italian companies (the 40 companies of the FTSE-MIB at 18 December 2013) and the second relative to the best international performers (the 24 world Sustainability Industry Group Leaders, identified by the RobecoSAM sustainability rating agency and disclosed at the publishing of the Dow Jones Sustainability Index of September 2013). The purpose of the three panels is to guarantee, also relative to the type of indicator reviewed, a comparison between companies with the same operational characteristics, an Italian comparison, and a comparison with the top international performers. The Terna figures do not contribute to the calculation of the average in the case of the RobecoSAM – Supersector Leaders panel; • the companies considered from among those in the three panels were those which publicise the information necessary for comparisons either on their websites, through the Sustainability Report (even if not prepared following the GRI guidelines) or through other documentation (HSE Report, financial report, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • Dansk Energi Brev
    To: Energinet Astrid Buhr Broge [email protected] [email protected] Dok. ansvarlig: CAC Sekretær: Sagsnr: s2013-388 Doknr: d2021-22033-1.0 30. august 2021 Energinet consultation on the methodology for procurement of counter- trade energy Dansk Energi welcomes Energinet’s consultation on the methodology for procurement of so-called countertrade energy. Energinet has highlighted several issues driving the proposed methodology over the past year. However, the central task of a TSO is not to arrange a border specific market setup according to cli- mate effects or according to the costs of specific market dispatches. The central task of a TSO is to facilitate markets that provides correct price and investments signals in compliance with EU-regulation. Energinet’s proposed methodology seeks to address an internal German issue – lack of capacity in TenneT’s transmission grid – which has previously resulted in heavy reduction of capacity on the Dan- ish-German border. While this was solved with the Joint Declaration and Tennet Commitments in 2017-2018, Energinet’s proposed methodology rolls back these advances. The proposed methodology will sustain a distorted day-ahead market price formation in Denmark, an intraday market in DK1 with no export capacity towards Germany and an intraday market in Denmark where Energinet directly or through a third party is by far the largest market participant. These are not efficient elements in a well-functioning wholesale market and Dansk Energi does not consider it compliant with EU-regulation, nor do we consider it a proportional solution to address the internal German grid congestion. At this stage, Dansk Energi would like to highlight the following concerns and objections: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Statements of RWE AG 2012
    2012Financial Statements of RWE AG FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RWE AG The financial statements and review of operations of RWE AG for the 2012 fiscal year are submitted to Bundesanzeiger Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Cologne, Germany, the operator of the electronic Bundesanzeiger (Federal Gazette), and published in the electronic Bundesanzeiger. The review of operations of RWE AG has been combined with the review of operations of the RWE Group and is published in our annual report on pages 31 to 101 and pages 111 to 117. Balance Sheet 2 Income Statement 3 Notes 3 Dividend Proposal 20 Responsibility Statement 21 List of Shareholdings (Part of the Notes) 22 Boards (Part of the Notes) 47 Auditor’s Report 51 Financial Calendar 52 Imprint 53 2 Balance Sheet Balance Sheet at 31 December 2012 Assets (Note) 31 Dec 2012 31 Dec 2011 € million Non-current assets (1) Financial assets 42,440 39,246 Current assets Accounts receivable and other assets (2) Accounts receivable from affiliated companies 9,039 7,719 Accounts receivable from investments 1 Other assets 121 141 Marketable securities (3) 351 2,357 Cash and cash equivalents (4) 1,404 697 10,916 10,914 Prepaid expenses (5) 465 73 Deferred tax assets (6) 2,221 2,761 56,042 52,994 Equity and liabilities (Note) 31 Dec 2012 31 Dec 2011 € million Equity (7) Subscribed capital Common shares 1,474 1,474 Preferred shares 100 100 1,574 1,574 Less nominal value of treasury shares − 1 Capital issued 1,574 1,573 Capital reserve 2,385 2,385 Retained earnings Other retained earnings 4,870 4,737 Distributable profit
    [Show full text]
  • Tennet Integrated Annual Report 2019
    TenneT Holding B.V. Integrated Annual Report 2019 Key figures 2019 Safe workplace Diverse workforce Safety (TRIR) Gender ratio 4.8 23% 77% Satisfied capital providers* Environmental impact ROIC % Greened of our carbon footprint 5.1 27.4% Grid availability Safeguard capital structure* Grid availability FFO/Net debt 99.9998% 14.8% Future proof grid* Our workforce Annual Investments (EUR million) Number of employees (internal and external) 3,064 4,913 Engaged stakeholders Healthy financial operations* Reputation survey EBIT (EUR million) fairly strong to very strong 768 * Based on underlying figures Table of contents Integrated 2019 at a glance 2 Annual Letter from the Board 4 Report 2019 * About TenneT 6 Profile 6 Our strategy and value creation 9 Materiality analysis 14 * Our performance in 2019 16 Deliver a high security of supply 16 Ensure critical infrastructure for society 23 Create a sustainable workplace 30 Contents Create value to transition to a low carbon economy 36 Secure a solid financial performance and investor rating 44 Solve societal challenges with stakeholders and through partnerships 50 Statements of the Executive Board 57 Our Executive Board 58 Supervisory Board Report 60 Supervisory Board Report 60 Remuneration policy 66 Board remuneration 68 Our Supervisory Board 72 * Governance and risk management 74 Corporate governance 74 Risk management and internal control 76 Risk management and internal control framework 79 Compliance and integrity 80 Risk appetite 82 Key risks 83 Financial statements 87 Consolidated financial statements 88 Notes to the consolidated financial statements 95 Company financial statements 147 Notes to the company financial statements 149 Other information 152 Profit appropriation 152 Independent auditor’s report 153 Assurance report of the independent auditor 160 About this report 163 Reconciliation of non-IFRS financial measures 168 SWOT Analysis 169 Key figures: five-year summary 170 Glossary 171 * These sections reflect the director’s report as mentioned by Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code.
    [Show full text]
  • System Plan 2018 – Electricity and Gas in Denmark 2 System Plan 2018
    SYSTEM PLAN 2018 – ELECTRICITY AND GAS IN DENMARK 2 SYSTEM PLAN 2018 CONTENTS 1. A holistic approach to electricity and gas planning ......................................3 1.1 Energinet’s objectives and the political framework .............................................. 3 1.2 New organisation ............................................................................................................. 4 1.3 Analysis and planning .................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Research and development .......................................................................................... 8 1.5 Environmental reporting ..............................................................................................10 1.6 Energy efficiency ............................................................................................................11 2. Electricity .........................................................................................................16 2.1 Security of electricity supply ......................................................................................17 2.2 Resources to safeguard balance and technical quality ......................................22 2.3 Cooperation with other countries ..............................................................................24 2.4 Cooperation with other grid operators ....................................................................29 2.5 Planning for conversion and expansion of electrical installations
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Outlook Report 2012 and Winter Review 2011/2012
    SUMMER OUTLOOK REPORT 2012 AND WINTER REVIEW 2011/2012 European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity An Overview of System Adequacy: Summer Outlook Report 2012 and Winter Review 2011/2012 ENTSO -E Avenue Cortenbergh 100 • 1000 Brussels • Belgium • Tel +32 2 7410950 • Fax +32 2 741 0951 • [email protected] • www.entsoe.eu SUMMER OUTLOOK REPORT 2012 AND WINTER REVIEW 2011/2012 European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 3 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................. 4 3 METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................... 5 3.1 SOURCE OF INFORMATION AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................... 5 3.2 AIMS AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................ 7 4 WINTER REVIEW .................................................................................................... 10 5 SUMMER OUTLOOK ............................................................................................... 11 5.1 GENERAL OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................... 11 5.2 INDIVIDUAL COUNTRY PERSPECTIVE ANALYSIS .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Benefits of Investing in Electricity Transmission a Case Study of Northern Europe
    The Benefits of Investing in Electricity Transmission A Case Study of Northern Europe Jonas Teusch Arno Behrens Christian Egenhofer January 2012 Abstract Electricity trading can bring down the costs of the EU’s transition to a competitive low-carbon economy, in particular by facilitating the integration of renewable energy from variable sources. Yet insufficient grid infrastructure and regulatory obstacles prevent the trading potential from being fully realised in northern Europe. While many interconnector projects are under development, various barriers are precluding the grid rollout from taking place on time. The European Commission’s energy infrastructure package is an important step forward to overcome these barriers. But the scale and urgency of the infrastructure challenge call for significant further progress. This study was funded by Dong Energy, Fortum, Statkraft and Vattenfall. The authors would like to extend special thanks to officials and representatives from the European Commission, ENTSO-E, ACER, BNetzA, the Swedish Markets Inspectorate and EWEA for their valuable assistance and support. The preliminary results of this study were discussed at a stakeholder workshop held at CEPS on 28 September 2011; the main results were debated by a high-level panel on 28 November 2011. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed are attributable only to the authors in a personal capacity and not to any institution with which they are associated. ISBN 978-94-6138-161-3 Available for free downloading from the CEPS website (http://www.ceps.eu)
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes SDAC Joint Steering Committee Meeting 28/10/2020,11:00 – 17:00 CET, Conference Call
    Minutes SDAC Joint Steering Committee Meeting 28/10/2020,11:00 – 17:00 CET, conference call Present parties 50Hertz Cropex EPEX Spot Litgrid PSE Terna Admie EirGrid (TSO) ESO MAVIR REE TGE Amprion Eirgrid (SEMO PX) EXAA Nasdaq REN Transelectrica APG ElecLink Fingrid Nemo Link RTE Transnet BW AST Elering GME NGIC/NGIFA2 SEPS TTG BritNed ELES HEnEx OKTE SONI (SEMO PX) TTN BSP Elia HOPS OMIE SONI (TSO) ČEPS EMCO Nord Pool HUPX OPCOM Statnett Creos Energinet IBEX OTE Svk Attending by phone Not present Present chairs, TF leaders, PMOs, observers BMTF leader/PMO Entso-e MRC OPSCOM leader MSD TSO co-leader OST Swissgrid EC JSC Secretary MRC OPSCOM PMO MSD PMO PCR chair & PMO TSO co-chair EMS MEPSO MSD NEMO co-leader NEMO co-chair Procedures TF leader Attending by phone Not present Meeting agenda # Topic For 1 Welcome, practicalities 1.1 Confirm quorum Inf 1.2 Adoption of the agenda Dec 1.3 Approval of minutes of past meetings/calls (incl. part for publication) Dec 1.4 Review open action points Inf 2 Strategy/governance 2.1 Exit plan for GB parties Dec 2.2 DAOA: clarification re. approval of updated operational procedures Dec 2.3 15 min MTU implementation project Dec 2.4 Assessment on synergies between regions and SDAC Inf 3 Important points to highlight and decisions requested by TFs 3.1 BMTF Dec 3.2 MRC OPSCOM – PART 1 Dec Lunch break 3.3 Confirm quorum Inf 3.4 MRC OPSCOM – PART 2 Inf 3.5 Interim Coupling Project Inf 3.6 MSD (20 min) Inf 3.7 Intraday auctions (IDA) Inf 3.8 CCP default – status reporting Inf 3.9 JSC members questions to reports in back-up section Dis 4 Important points for SDAC from ENTSO-E/ NC/ NRAs/ ACER/ EC 4.1 Joint SDAC & SIDC governance: “lean” implementation proposal Dis 4.2 Feedback from 22/09 TCG and 23/09 MESC Inf 5 Any other business 5.1 SDAC communication plan Inf 5.2 Qualified electronic signature – status investigation outcome Inf 5.3 Next meetings Inf 1 List of decisions # Topic Decision 1.2 Adoption of the The meeting agenda is approved.
    [Show full text]