DOCSLIB.ORG

LITGRID AB the Company's Financial Statements, Annual Report and Independent Auditor's Report for the Year Ended 31 Decembe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LITGRID AB the Company's Financial Statements, Annual Report and Independent Auditor's Report for the Year Ended 31 Decembe LITGRID AB The Company’s financial statements, annual report and independent auditor’s report for the year ended 31 December 2020 CONFIRMATION OF RESPONSIBLE PERSONS 15 March 2021, Vilnius Following the Law on Securities of the Republic of Lithuania and the Rules on Information Disclosure approved by the Bank of Lithuania, we, Rokas Masiulis, Chief Executive Officer of LITGRID AB, Vytautas Tauras, Director of the Finance Department of LITGRID AB and Jurgita Kerpė, Head of the Accounting Division of LITGRID AB, hereby confirm that, to the best of our knowledge, the attached financial statements of LITGRID AB for the year 2020 prepared in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards adopted by the European Union give a true and fair view of the Company’s assets, liabilities, financial position, profit and cash flows; the annual report for the year 2020 presents a fair overview of the business development and performance, the Company’s financial position together with the description of its exposure to key risks and contingencies. Rokas Masiulis Chief Executive Officer Vytautas Tauras Director of the Finance Department Jurgita Kerpė Head of the Accounting Division CONTENTS Translation note: This version of the accompanying documents is a translation from the original, which was prepared in Lithuanian. All possible care has been taken to ensure that the translation is an accurate representation of the original. However, in all matters of interpretation of information, views or opinions, the original language version of the accompanying documents takes precedence over this translation. Independent auditor’s report 4 Annual report 10 The Company’s statement of financial position 101 The Company’s statement of comprehensive income 102 The Company’s statement of changes in equity 103 The Company’s statement of cash flows 104 Notes to the Company’s financial statements 105 The financial statements were approved on 15 March 2021. Rokas Masiulis Chief Executive Officer Vytautas Tauras Director of the Finance Department Jurgita Kerpė Head of the Accounting Division 3 Independent auditor’s report To the shareholders of LITGRID AB Report on the audit of the financial statements Our opinion In our opinion, the financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial position of LITGRID AB (the “Company”) as at 31 December 2020 and the Company’s financial performance and its cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union. Our opinion is consistent with our additional report to the Audit Committee dated 15 March 2021. What we have audited The Company’s financial statements comprise: ● the statement of financial position as at 31 December 2020; ● the statement of comprehensive income for the year then ended; ● the statement of changes in equity for the year then ended; ● the statement of cash flows for the year then ended; and ● the notes to the financial statements, which include significant accounting policies and other explanatory information. Basis for opinion We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (ISAs). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. Independence We are independent of the Company in accordance with the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) issued by the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA Code) and the Law of the Republic of Lithuania on the Audit of Financial Statements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the Republic of Lithuania. We have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with the IESBA Code and the Law of the Republic of Lithuania on the Audit of Financial Statements. To the best of our knowledge and belief, we declare that non-audit services that we have provided to the Company are in accordance with the applicable law and regulations in the Republic of Lithuania and that we have not provided non-audit services that are prohibited under Article 5(1) of Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 considering the exemptions of Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 endorsed in the Law of the Republic of Lithuania on the Audit of Financial Statements. The non-audit services that we have provided to the Company, in the period from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020, are disclosed in note 39 to the financial statements. PricewaterhouseCoopers UAB, J. Jasinskio str. 16B, 03163 Vilnius, Lithuania +370 (5) 239 2300, [email protected], www.pwc.lt Company code 111473315, registered with the Legal Entities’ Register of the Republic of Lithuania Our audit approach Overview Materiality ● Overall materiality: Euro 2,070 thousand Key audit matters ● Value of Property, plant and equipment As part of designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements. In particular, we considered where management made subjective judgements; for example, in respect of significant accounting estimates that involved making assumptions and considering future events that are inherently uncertain. As in all of our audits, we also addressed the risk of management override of internal controls, including, among other matters, consideration of whether there was evidence of bias that represented a risk of material misstatement due to fraud. We tailored the scope of our audit in order to perform sufficient work to enable us to provide an opinion on the financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Company, the accounting processes and controls, and the industry in which the Company operates. Materiality The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. An audit is designed to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. Misstatements may arise due to fraud or error. They are considered material if individually or in aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements. Based on our professional judgement, we determined certain quantitative thresholds for materiality, including the overall Company materiality for the financial statements as a whole as set out in the table below. These, together with qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, if any, both individually and in aggregate on the financial statements as a whole. Overall Company materiality EUR 2,070 thousand How we determined it 1% of total revenue Rationale for the materiality We chose revenue as the benchmark for the Company benchmark applied because it is the measure against which the performance of the Company is assessed by the regulatory bodies as well as external creditors and other stakeholders. The Company’s results depend on approved tariffs for regulated activities, therefore the Company‘s profit before tax fluctuate widely year over year, whereas its revenue is more stable and growth-oriented indicator which can be compared to other market participants. We chose 1%, which is within the range of acceptable quantitative materiality thresholds. We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them misstatements identified during our audit above EUR 145 thousand, as well as misstatements below that amount that, in our view, warranted reporting for qualitative reasons. Key audit matters Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. Key audit matter How our audit addressed the key audit matter We understood and evaluated management’s Value of Property, plant and equipment policies, processes and controls in determination (refer note 2.4 and 6) of fair value of PPE. The Company applies the revaluation model We have examined management’s valuation for subsequent recognition of property, plant methodology and their assessment of expected and equipment (‘PPE’). As at 31 December changes in tariff setting regulations. 2020 the carrying value of PPE amounted to EUR 331,709 thousand, being its fair value at We obtained the cash flow models used by the the date of the revaluation less subsequent management to assess the value of assets. We accumulated depreciation and less subsequent checked the models and tested that they are accumulated impairment losses. mathematically accurate and that the results are accurately compared to the carrying values of The management has assessed whether the assets. We examined the management’s carrying value of PPE does not materially differ assumptions which have material impacts on from that which would be determined using fair valuation results: rate of return on regulated value at the end of the reporting period. The assets and discount rate, expected capital Company used the income approach using the expenditures, values of regulated assets and discounted cash flows
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Power Transmission System in Lithuania
    1 POWER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM IN LITHUANIA Vaida Tamašauskaitė Power System Development Department Power System Planning Division Lietuvos energija AB Tallinn, 21 April, 2006 LIETUVOS ENERGIJA AB: Owns: • 110-330 kV transmission grid; 2 • Kaunas HPP and Kruonis HPSP; • The dispatch centre; • The telecommunications and information system. Main functions: • Maintenance and Development of Transmission System • System Operation • Market Administration • Security of Supply in Lithuania Owners • 96,62% - state; • 3,38% - private shareholders. THE S TRUCTURE OF POWER S ECTOR IN LITHUANIA 3 PRODUCTION • 3 production companies • 3 CHP of district heating companies • Few private mini HPP • Few industrial power plants DIS TRIBUTION • Two distribution companies (one private) TRANS MIS S ON • One Transmission System Operator company – Lietuvos Energija AB INS TALLED GENERATING CAPACITIES (BRUTTO) IN LITHUANIA 4 MW Fuel 2005 2010 2015 Nuclear: Ignalina nuclear 1300 - - Thermal: 2630 2342 2462 Gas, HFO, Elektrėnai (condensing) 1800 1500 1500 orimulsion Vilnius CHP 384 372 372 Gas, HFO Kaunas CHP 178 170 170 Gas, HFO Mažeikiai 160 160 160 HFO Others 108 140 260 Hydro: 1024 1028 1033 Kaunas HPP 100 100 100 Kruonis HPSPP 900 900 900 Small scale HPP totally 24 28 33 Other renewables: 34 222 335 Wind 30 200 300 Others 4 22 35 Total generation 4988 3592 3830 Total without hydro and 3934 2364 2497 wind Peak demand 2100 2450 2900 INS TALLED GENERATION CAPACITIES IN LITHUANIA Mažeikiai 5 160 MW Telšiai Šiauliai Panevėžys Klaipėda Ignalina Utena 10 MW 1300 MW Jurbarkas
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind and Hydrogen: Solving the Integration Challenge
    OFFSHORE WIND AND HYDROGEN SOLVING THE INTEGRATION CHALLENGE OSW-H2: SOLVING THE INTEGRATION CHALLENGE 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The study was jointly supported by the Offshore Wind Industry Council (OWIC) and Offshore Renewable Energy (ORE) Catapult, and delivered by ORE Catapult. The Offshore Wind Industry Council is a senior Government and industry forum established in 2013 to drive the development of the UK’s world- leading offshore wind sector. OWIC is responsible for overseeing implementation of the UK Offshore Wind Industrial Strategy. ORE Catapult is a not-for-profit research organisation, established in 2013 by the UK Government as one of a network of Catapults in high growth industries. It is the UK’s leading innovation centre for offshore renewable energy and helps to create UK economic benefit in the sector by helping to reduce the cost of offshore renewable energy, and support the growth of the industry. AUTHORS: ANGELIKI SPYROUDI KACPER STEFANIAK DAVID WALLACE STEPHANIE MANN GAVIN SMART ZEYNEP KURBAN The authors would like to thank a number of organisations and stakeholders for their support through Steering Committee and Expert Group meetings or individually. They include, in alphabetical order: Atkins (David Cole), BEIS (Tasnim Choudhury, Simone Cooper Searle, David Curran, Rose Galloway – Green, Fiona Mettam, Alan Morgan, Allan Taylor, Mark Taylor, Rita Wadey, Alex Weir) Committee on Climate Change (Mike Hemsley, David Joffe, Julia King), Crown Estate Scotland (Mark McKean), EDF Energy (David Acres), Energy Systems Catapult (Nick
    [Show full text]
  • System Plan 2018 – Electricity and Gas in Denmark 2 System Plan 2018
    SYSTEM PLAN 2018 – ELECTRICITY AND GAS IN DENMARK 2 SYSTEM PLAN 2018 CONTENTS 1. A holistic approach to electricity and gas planning ......................................3 1.1 Energinet’s objectives and the political framework .............................................. 3 1.2 New organisation ............................................................................................................. 4 1.3 Analysis and planning .................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Research and development .......................................................................................... 8 1.5 Environmental reporting ..............................................................................................10 1.6 Energy efficiency ............................................................................................................11 2. Electricity .........................................................................................................16 2.1 Security of electricity supply ......................................................................................17 2.2 Resources to safeguard balance and technical quality ......................................22 2.3 Cooperation with other countries ..............................................................................24 2.4 Cooperation with other grid operators ....................................................................29 2.5 Planning for conversion and expansion of electrical installations
    [Show full text]
  • Firmness Deadlines
    List of Bidding Zone borders and/or their subsets and their corresponding day-ahead firmness deadlines List of Bidding Zone borders and/or their subsets of interconnectors Day-ahead firmness List of responsible TSOs deadline Austria (AT) Czechia (CZ) <> D-1 10:00 APG CEPS Austria (AT) Hungary (HU) <> D-1 10:00 APG MAVIR Austria (AT) Italy (NORD) <> D-1 11:00 APG TERNA Austria (AT) Slovenia (SI) <> D-1 11:00 APG ELES Belgium (BE) France (FR) <> D-1 11:00 ELIA RTE Belgium (BE) Netherlands (NL) <> D-1 11:00 ELIA TenneT TSO B.V. Belgium (BE) Great Britain (GB) <> D-1 11:00 ELIA, Nemo Link NGESO, Nemo Link Croatia (HR) Hungary (HU) <> D-1 10:00 HOPS MAVIR Croatia (HR) Slovenia (SI) <> D-1 11:00 HOPS ELES Czechia (CZ) Germany (DE) <> D-1 10:00 CEPS 50Hertz Czechia (CZ) Germany (DE) <> D-1 10:00 CEPS TenneT TSO GmbH Czechia (CZ) Poland (PL) <> D-1 10:00 CEPS PSE Denmark (DK1) Denmark (DK2) <> D-1 11:00 Energinet Energinet Denmark (DK1) Germany (DE) <> D-1 11:00 Energinet TenneT TSO GmbH Denmark (DK2) Germany (DE) <> D-1 11:00 Energinet 50Hertz France (FR) Germany (DE) <> D-1 11:00 RTE Amprion, Transnet BW 1 | P a g e List of Bidding Zone borders and/or their subsets of interconnectors Day-ahead firmness List of responsible TSOs deadline France (FR) Italy (NORD) <> D-1 11:00 RTE TERNA France (FR) Spain (ES) <> D-1 11:00 RTE REE Germany (DE) Amprion, Netherlands (NL) <> D-1 11:00 TenneT TSO GmbH TenneT TSO B.V.
    [Show full text]
  • The Technical State of Earth Dams in Lithuania
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT ISSN 1648-6897 print/ISSN 1822-4199 online 2013 Volume 21(3): 180–188 doi:10.3846/16486897.2012.662910 THE TECHNICAL STATE OF EARTH DAMS IN LITHUANIA Raimondas Sˇadzevicˇius1, Vitas Damulevicˇius2, Rytis Skominas3 1,3Department of Building Constructions, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Universiteto g. 10, LT-53361 Kaunas, Lithuania 2Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Universiteto g. 10, LT-53361 Kaunas, Lithuania Submitted 2 Jan. 2011; accepted 29 Nov. 2011 Abstract. Dams are ageing out as all constructions do, and inaccuracies during the field survey, designing and construction, as well as defects of building materials and deterioration due to environmental impacts accelerate the aging process. The article presents the technical state assessment comparable results of 260 Lithuanian earth dams performed in 2002–2009 and 368 dams in 1997; the analysis of character and causes of the main deteriorations and defects. The typical causes of failure (according to their danger to the stability of the entire hydroscheme) are: diverse intensity of seepage water leakage at the downstream slope and the tailwater of dam; landslides and deformation of the slopes of the dams; bigger cracks, deformation, tilt in shaft spillway; scour, deformation of dam slope protection slabs, concrete cover layer deterioration, collapsing of junctures are mainly caused by the environmental (frost cycles; ice, wave blows; moss, grass, bushes roots; periodical wetting, etc.) impacts. Keywords: environmental impact assessment, earth dams, deterioration, technical state. Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Sˇadzevicˇius, R.; Damulevicˇius, V.; Skominas, R. 2013. The technical state of earth dams in Lithuania, Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management 21(3): 180–188.
    [Show full text]
  • System Operation Stakeholders Committee
    System Operation Stakeholders Committee Materials for meeting 16th September 2020 1.1 Review of the Agenda Time Agenda Topics Documents Lead 1. Opening Uros Gabrijel 13:30-13:35 1.1 Review of the agenda Agenda 13:35-13:45 1.2 Review and approval of minutes from previous meeting Minutes 13:45-13:55 1.3 Review of actions Slides Ana Cigaran 13:55-14:15 2. Update on the implementation actions at pan-EU level Slides Ana Cigaran 3. System Operation Guideline Slides 14:15-14:30 3.1 Cost Benefit Analysis for FCR providers by Limited Energy Reservoirs: Luca Ortolano Status update 3.2 Information on Exchange\Sharing of reserves 14:30-15:00 Mohamed El Jafoufi 15:00-15:15 4. CGM Program Implementation Update Derek Lawler 15:15-15:45 5. NC ER Implementation update Slides Rafal Kuczynski 5.1 Update on TCM Status according to Art. 4. 6. Information on Low frequency Pump disconnection & energy storage units Rafal Kuczynski\Walter Sattinger 15:45-16:00 6.1 Why low frequency pump disconnection is triggered at different frequencies across Europe? 6.2 Outlook on the plans for the energy storage units 16:00-16:15 16:15-16:30 7. AOB – Next meeting 9th December Uros Gabrijel 2 1.3 Review of actions Ana Cigaran 3 1.3 Review of actions (I) ACTION ANSWER STATUS 1. Note for future SO GL active library to include pre- Preparation for SO GL Active Library Open qualification process aFRR, mFRR, RR. is in good progress both for the Digital and content part.
    [Show full text]
  • Ginet, Svenska Kraftnät and Statnett
    Explanatory document concerning the proposal from the Transmission system operators Ener- ginet, Svenska kraftnät and Statnett for the deter- mination of LFC blocks within the Nordic synchro- nous area in accordance with Article 141(2) of the Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1485 of 2 Au- gust 2017 establishing a guideline on electricity transmission system operation 1 Content 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 3 2. Legal requirements and interpretation ............................................................................ 3 2.1 Legal references and requirements ..................................................................... 3 2.2 Interpretation and scope of the proposal ............................................................. 4 3. Proposal for LFC blocks in the Nordic Synchronous Area ................................................... 5 3.1 Current status in the Nordic synchronous system ................................................. 5 3.2 Assessment of prerequisites for the proposal........................................................ 6 3.3 Process to form a block with three parties............................................................ 7 3.4 Expected impact of the proposed load-frequency control structure .......................... 8 3.5 Public consultation ............................................................................................ 8 4. Timescale for implementation ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation Funding Incentive
    Annual Report 2010/11 Innovation Funding Incentive Electricity Transmission R&D Programme Detailed Reports National Grid Electricity Transmission R&D Programme Detailed Report During the financial year, 2010/2011 National Grid Electricity Transmission utilised 99% of the Innovation Funding Incentive across a number of programme areas. These programme areas and their associated projects are indexed below and the detailed progress reports follow. The report has been structured to show research project and the area of research they relate to spanning network wide projects to specific asset types. Contents National Grid Electricity Transmission R&D Programme Detailed Report ............... 28 Contents ......................................................................................................................... 28 Network........................................................................................................................... 31 On line Monitoring Integration................................................................................................................. 31 Condition Monitoring (Assessment) of circuit Breakers .......................................................................... 35 Remote Mass Flow Meters ..................................................................................................................... 38 Review of Voltage Dependency of Load................................................................................................. 41 Demand Response ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Benefits of Investing in Electricity Transmission a Case Study of Northern Europe
    The Benefits of Investing in Electricity Transmission A Case Study of Northern Europe Jonas Teusch Arno Behrens Christian Egenhofer January 2012 Abstract Electricity trading can bring down the costs of the EU’s transition to a competitive low-carbon economy, in particular by facilitating the integration of renewable energy from variable sources. Yet insufficient grid infrastructure and regulatory obstacles prevent the trading potential from being fully realised in northern Europe. While many interconnector projects are under development, various barriers are precluding the grid rollout from taking place on time. The European Commission’s energy infrastructure package is an important step forward to overcome these barriers. But the scale and urgency of the infrastructure challenge call for significant further progress. This study was funded by Dong Energy, Fortum, Statkraft and Vattenfall. The authors would like to extend special thanks to officials and representatives from the European Commission, ENTSO-E, ACER, BNetzA, the Swedish Markets Inspectorate and EWEA for their valuable assistance and support. The preliminary results of this study were discussed at a stakeholder workshop held at CEPS on 28 September 2011; the main results were debated by a high-level panel on 28 November 2011. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed are attributable only to the authors in a personal capacity and not to any institution with which they are associated. ISBN 978-94-6138-161-3 Available for free downloading from the CEPS website (http://www.ceps.eu)
    [Show full text]
  • Lithuania's Implementation of Corporate Governance Accession Review Recommendations
    Note by the OECD Secretariat on Lithuania’s implementation of corporate governance accession review recommendations This Secretariat Note considers Lithuania’s progress in implementing the recommendations of the OECD Corporate Governance Committee's Corporate Governance Accession Review [published as OECD (2018), Corporate Governance in Lithuania https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264302617-en]. It was discussed by the Corporate Governance Committee and the Working Party on State Ownership and Privatisation Practices at their meeting in November 2020. For further information, contact [email protected]. LITHUANIA’S IMPLEMENTATION OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ACCESSION REVIEW RECOMMENDATIONS © OECD 2020 2 Table of contents Table of contents 2 1. Purpose and structure 4 2. Lithuania’s implementation of the priority recommendations related to the Principles of Corporate Governance 5 2.1. (i) Monitoring implementation of reforms to the company law and related laws 5 2.2. (ii) Medium-term plans to further strengthen board responsibilities 7 2.3. (iii) Recent company law amendments to strengthen independence criteria for listed company boards 8 3. Lithuania’s implementation of the additional recommendations related to the Principles of Corporate Governance 10 4. Lithuania’s implementation of the priority recommendations related to the SOE Guidelines 12 4.1. (i) Eliminating voting instructions 19 4.2. (ii) Further improving the board selection process 20 4.3. (iii) Corporatising commercially oriented statutory SOEs 23 5. Lithuania’s implementation of the additional recommendation related to the SOE Guidelines 27 6. Conclusions 28 6.1. Lithuania’s implementation of the priority recommendations 28 6.2. Lithuania’s implementation of the additional recommendations 30 6.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Successful Launch of Swe Common Synchronised Operations with Nwe Price
    North-Western Price Coupling of South-Western Europe Regions Europe SUCCESSFUL LAUNCH OF SWE COMMON SYNCHRONISED OPERATIONS WITH NWE PRICE COUPLING 4 February 2014. The South-Western Europe (SWE) and North-Western Europe (NWE) day-ahead price coupling project partners are pleased to announce the successful launch of common synchronised operations of NWE and SWE day-ahead markets. Full price coupling on the French-Spanish border will be launched at a later stage. This has been decided by the project partners, following common testing and alignment of Gate Closure Times. Both projects operate using the systems and procedures provided by the Price coupling of Regions (PCR) initiative. This launch is a significant step towards an integrated European power market. In pursuit of European day-ahead Price coupling, NWE and SWE have designed a step-by-step approach to integrate the Iberian market and NWE. Steps to integrate the day-ahead markets in the SWE and NWE regions have been underway since April 2013, addressing the joint testing of systems and operational procedures for the combined NWE and SWE regions. Alignment of timings in the SWE and NWE day-ahead markets successfully took place on 15 October 2013, when the Iberian day-ahead Gate Closure Time was switched to 12h00 CET. The penultimate step was achieved on 4 February with the go-live of common synchronised operations of the NWE and SWE projects for delivery on 5 February 2014. SWE uses the same PCR systems and operational procedures as NWE. For the time being, PCR will operate without offering capacity at the French-Spanish border to the price coupling, so the daily explicit auction on this border will be maintained as it is today.
    [Show full text]
  • Asmens Sveikatos Priežiūros Įstaigų Sąrašas Ir Skirtas Gripo Vakcinos Kiekis
    Asmens sveikatos prieži ūros įstaig ų s ąrašas ir skirtas gripo vakcinos kiekis Skirtas gripo Asmens sveikatos prieži ūros įstaigos Eil ÷s Nr. Savivaldyb ÷ vakcinos Asmens sveikatos prieži ūros įstaigos kontaktiniai duomenys pavadinimas kiekis, doz. Naujoji g. 48, tel. 8 315 39402, faks. 8 315 39902, el.p. 1 Alytaus raj. Vš Į Alytaus poliklinika 740 [email protected], Janina Matjošaitien ÷ Ligonin ÷s g. 12, Alytus LT-62114, tel. 8 315 56302, faks. 8 315 75530, el.p. 2 Alytaus raj. Alytaus aps S. Kudirkos ligonin ÷ 148 [email protected], Danut ÷ Kuzmickien ÷ Jaunimo g. 22-5, Allytus, tel/faks. 8 315 25688, mob. 8 61479002, el.p. 3 Alytaus raj. IĮ Vilmos Pr ūsaitien ÷s 185 [email protected], Vida Gudelevi čien ÷ Jiezno g. 2, Alytus, tel. 8 315 75325, faks. 8 315 50293, el.p. 4 Alytaus raj. Vš Į Alytaus miesto sav.PSPC 291 [email protected], J ūrat ÷ Filatovien ÷ Simno g. 22, Alytus, tel/faks. 8 315 21225, el.p. [email protected], Giedr ÷ 5 Alytaus raj. UAB "Pagalba ligonui" 148 Jagminien ÷ Vš Į Alytaus medicinin ÷s reabilitacijos ir sporto Pramon ÷s g. 9, Alytus LT-62175, tel/faks. 8 315 77440, el.p. 6 Alytaus raj. 52 centras [email protected], Nijol ÷ Jakubaitien ÷ Naujoji g. 48, Alytus, tel/faks. 8 315 71412, el.p. 7 Alytaus raj. Vš Į Alytaus raj. sav. PSPC 148 [email protected], Gražina Stravinskien ÷ Vilties g. 6, Miroslavas, Alytaus raj., tel. 8 315 66394, faks. 8 315 66451, 8 Alytaus raj. Vš Į Alytaus raj. Miroslavo ambulatorija 74 el.p.
    [Show full text]