NAPCIS Teacher Certification Program
Study Guide for Pope Pius XI’s Divini illius Magistri
Why did Pope Pius XI write this encyclical?
What does he propose to teach in this encyclical?
What cautions toward modern education contributed to writing this encyclical?
Explain the connection between education and man’s last end.
What are the essential aspects of Christian education? Explain each.
Describe the three necessary societies.
To whom does education belong pre-eminently? Explain why and how this is so.
Discuss the rights of the family and the state regarding education.
To what are parents’ rights to educate subordinate?
Explain education vis a vis the Church’s mission to all mankind.
What are the state’s rights and responsibility toward education?
What principles that were outlined by Leo XIII in Immortale Dei and Sapientiae Christianae contribute to our understanding of the relationship between Church and state?
Explain the relationship and harmony between Faith and reason.
What is “false naturalism”?
Is sex instruction a moral possibility for schools and classrooms?
What is co-education? Is it a true option?
What are the obligations and responsibilities of families and parents?
What is the Christian educational environment?
Trace the historical origin of the school. To whom is it subsidiary and complementary?
What does distributive justice require for schools?
What makes a school, properly speaking, a Catholic school?
Describe the good teacher.
What challenges are posed by the world to education?
What is the true Christian?
What are the fruits of Christian education? Divini illius Magistri
Outline
I Preamble: [1]
Christ, the Divine Master; the Pope, his representative on earth; they love children and will treat of the Christian education of youth (1)
II Introduction: [2-10]
A The Problem in Brief (2-6)
B The Solution in Brief (7-10)
III Those Who Must Educate [11-57]
A Social Activity of Education; Three Necessary Societies: Family, State, Church (11-14)
B Pre-eminence of the Church, Her Titles: Magisterium and Mother (15-17)
C Rights of the Church (18-24)
D The Church’s Mission in Education (25-27)
E The Harmony Between the Church, the Family and the State (28-29)
F The Family (30-40)
G The State (41-50)
H Church and State Relations: Doctrine of Christian Constitution of States (51-54)
I Faith and Reason (55-57)
IV Those Who Are to Be Educated [58-69]
A The Subject of Education: Man, Defects of Man Are Corrected (58-59)
B Pedagogy Opposed to this Subject and His State: Naturalism (60-69)
V Necessary Accompanying Circumstances in Education: Environment [70-92]
A The Environment of Education Must Correspond to the End of Education (70) B The Christian Family (71-74)
C The Church (75-76)
D The School (77-79)
E The Catholic School (80)
F Mixed Faith Nations (81-83)
G Catholic Action (84-85)
H Catholic Program of Studies (86-87)
I Good Teachers (88)
J Necessary Vigilance Over Recreation, Social Intercourse, Books, Media and Ideas (89-92)
VI End and Object of Christian Education According to God’s Established Order In the Economy of His Divine Providence [93-99]
A The True Nature of Christian Education as Deduced from Its End, Pre-Eminent Mission of Church
B Cooperate with Divine Grace in Forming the True and Perfect Christian (94-96)
C By Our Fruits We Will Be Known/Judged by the World; Succeed Only if Follow All This (97)
D Coordinate Actions of This Life with the Supernatural (98)
E Proved in History of Christianity and Its Institution which = True Civilization and Progress Saints Are greatest Benefactors of Society and Models for all Classes and Professions (99)
VII Conclusion [100-102]
A These Fruits of Christian Education Derive from Supernatural Virtue and Life in Christ which Is Formed and Developed in Man
B Christ is Source and Dispenser Thereof, He the Model of Labor and Obedience with Virtues Personal, Domestic and Social, Before God and Men (100)
C O Church, True Mother and Teacher (101)
D O Divine King, May the Fruits of Christian Education Be Gathered in Ever Greater Abundance (102) Divini illius Magistri
Detailed Outline
I Preamble: [1]
Christ, the Divine Master; the Pope, his representative on earth; they love children and will treat of the Christian education of youth (1)
II Introduction: [2-10]
A The Problem in Brief 1 The Magisterium will be insistent and consistent at all times (2) 2 The problems today that occasioned the encyclical (2) 3 Statement of what will be treated herein (3) 4 Man is directed to a higher perfection, but his new educational methods are misguided (5-6)
B The Solution in Brief 1 Christian Education Defined; the whole work of education is intimately and necessarily connected to man’s last end (7) 2 Education and the Common Good; Formation of the soul –mind and habits (8) 3 Educators receive Christ (9) 4 A Clear and Definite Idea of Christian Education (10)
III Those Who Must Educate [11-57]
A Social Activity of Education; Three Necessary Societies (11) 1 Family: Generation and Formation of Offspring; Priority of Nature; Rights Over Civil Society 2 Civil Society: Perfect Society, Possessing All Means for Its End, Community’s Well Being Pre-eminence Over the Family (12) 3 Church: Supernatural Order, Universal Extent, Perfect Society: All Means for Salvation (13) 4 Education Belongs Proportionately to All Three Societies (14)
B Pre-eminence of the Church, Her Titles (15) 1 Title One: Magisterium, Infallible Teacher (16) 2 Title Two: Mother, Supernatural Maternity –Generates, Nurtures, Educates Souls (17)
C Rights of the Church 1 Shares in Divine Magisterium, Immunity from Error 2 Independent of Earthly Powers in End/Object and Means; Use and Judge Natural Tools (18) 3 Natural Must Remain Ordered to the Supernatural (19) 4 Morality belongs “Wholly” to the Church: Omnem Veritatem (20) 5 Promotes Letters, Science, Art, Runs Schools and Institutions of Culture (21) 6 Families and States are Improved, Perfected and Saved, Yet Respected (22) 7 All Institutions, Learning and Regulations are Supervised by Church re: Faith and Morals (23) 8 Motherly Protection (24)
D The Church’s Mission in Education 1 Embrace Every Nation 2 Medieval Model Continuing Today: Houses of Religion Paired with House of Study (25-27)
E The Harmony Between the Church, the Family and the State (28-29)
F The Family 1 From God the Principles Fecundity of Life, and Education to Life; of Authority and Order (30) 2 Father: Participate God’s Principles of Generation, Education, Discipline, Perfecting Life (31) 3 Inalienable Right to Educate Offspring, Anterior to Civil Society’s Rights (32) 4 Child is Naturally Something of the Father, and Has Dominion Until Perfection/Reason (33) 5 Canon Law (34) 6 Not True: Man is Born a Citizen and Belongs Primarily to the State 7 Duty of Parents to Safeguard Against Impiety of Such State Schools (35) 8 Family’s Obligation in Religious, Moral, Physical and Civic Education (36) 9 US Supreme Court, Oregon School case, 6/1/1925; State Uphold Natural Law (37) 10 Church Defends the Family Against State Violations (38) 11 Church Respects Children of Infidels and Doesn’t Impose Baptism of Children (II-II X 12) (39) 12 Church and Family by natural and divine law cannot be slighted, evaded or supplanted (40)
G The State 1 Civil Society is Improved by the Rights of the Church and Family in Education (41) 2 Rights of State Accords to Its Purpose of Existence: Common Good’s Temporal Welfare (42-43) 3 State’s Duty to Legislate Protections of Families and Individuals (44-45) 4 Duty to Protect and Promote Prudently Moral and Religious Education (46) 5 State 1st Right to Educate Civic and Political Duties, 2nd Physical, Intellectual, Moral Ed. (47) 6 Distributive Justice Protects Against Educational Monopolies Forcing Government Schools (48) 7 Run Civic Schools for Furthering Public Affairs and Peace Re: Military Arts/Civic Duty (49-50)
H Church and State Relations 1 State’s Activity in Education Rests on Doctrine of Christian Constitution of States Leo XIII Immortale Dei and Sapietiae Christianae (51-52) 2 The More Spiritual a Nation, the More It Promotes the Commonwealth (53-54)
I Faith and Reason, 1 Not at Variance, but a Mutual Help (55-56) 2 Just Freedom in Science Translates to Just Freedom in Things Didactic Teacher Has No Absolute Right of His Own (57)
IV Those Who Are to Be Educated [58-69]
A The Subject of Education 1 Man: a Whole and Entire, Soul United to Body in Unity of Nature, All Natural and Supernatural Faculties b As Reason and Revelation Show c Fallen from Original Estate, Redeemed by Christ, Restored Supernatural Condition of Adopted Sonship d Without Preternatural Privileges of Bodily Immortality and Perfect Control of Appetite e Suffering Effects of Original Sin, Chiefly Weakness of Will and Disorderly Inclinations (58) 2 Defects of Man Are Corrected by: a Rod of Correction Drive Away Disorderly Inclinations b Good Tendencies Encourages and Regulated (Virtue) c Mind Enlightened and Will Strengthened by Doctrine and Sacraments (59)
B Pedagogy Opposed to this Subject and His State: Naturalism 1 Weakens Supernatural Formation; Denies or Forgets Original Sin, Grace; Human Reliance (60) 2 Dishonest Claim to Get Pupil More Responsible for Own Education/Freed from Despotism (61) 3 Separation of Education from the Divine Law Upon which It Depends: a Decalogue, b Gospel Law c Natural Law (62) 4 An Emancipation Equaling Slavery to Blind Pride and Disorderly affections (63) 5 Natural and Profane Research, Experimentation and Conclusion of Things Supernatural (64) 6 Sex Education of That Most Delicate Matter of Morals a Foolhardy Initiation and Precautionary Instruction for All, Exposition to Occasions in Order to Harden b Ignoring Inborn Weakness, Flesh Fights the Mind (Rom 8:23), c Wrong: Ignorance of Intellect is the Cause of Evil. d Right: Weakness of Will Exposed to Dangerous Occasions, Unsupported by Grace e Father to Son, Mother to Daughter; yet even there Risk of Sin (65-67) 7 Co-education a Error: Naturalism/Denial Original Sin and Leveling Promiscuity/Equality of Association of Sexes b Creator Ordained Perfect Union of Sexes only in Matrimony, and Less So in Family and Society c Nature Fashions the Sexes Different in Organism, Temperament and Abilities d Differences are Complemented in Family and Society through the Development of the Differences e Prudence to Govern Age/Circumstance, Time/Place, Especially in Delicate/Decisive Period of Formation f Gymnastics for Females Guard Christian Modesty, Especially in Public Exhibition (68) g “Woe to the World Because of Scandals!” (69)
V Necessary Accompanying Circumstances in Education: Environment [70-92]
A The Environment of Education Must Correspond to the End of Education (70)
B The Christian Family 1 Well-ordered, Well-discipline Christian Family Giving Good Example (71-72) 2 Present-Day Lamentable Decline in Family Education, Economics Sending Children Away from Home Deformed and Depraved in Godless Schools to the Irreligion and Hatred of Socialism (73) 3 Priests Warn Parents of Grave Obligation in Religious, Moral and Civil Formation, and Means 4 Problem of Relaxed Parental Discipline and Implanting Holy Filial Fear of God (74)
C The Church 1 Grace and Means to Meet Weakness of Man’s Fallen Nature (75) 2 Environment: Sacraments, Ritual, Liturgy and Architecture Instructive (76)
D The School 1 Task of Training in Arts and Sciences for Civil Society is Beyond the Competency of the Family 2 School Owes Its Initiation to Family and Church, not State (77-78) 3 Neutral or “Lay” School Devoid of Religion is Contrary to the Principles of Education 4 Attending Such Schools is Forbidden, Except by Permission of Ordinary (79)
E The Catholic School 1 Neutral School with a glazing of Religion is not Permitted 2 Christian Spirit to Regulate Everything and Everyone at School; Religion Foundation and Crown (80)
F Mixed Faith Nations 1 Duty of State to Leave Free Scope to Initiative of Church and Family, Give Just Assistance 2 Distributive Justice Demands Support for Catholic Schools from State (81-83)
G Catholic Action 1 Laity taking Responsibility in the World to Promote the Proper Duty of the State 2 Not Party Politics, but Religious Enterprise Demanded by Conscience (84-85)
H Catholic Program of Studies 1 False Doctrine May Be Studied for the Purpose of Refuting It; Pagan Classics –Find Truth (86-87)
I Good Teachers 1 Perfect Schools Depend on Good Teachers more than Good Methods (88)
J Necessary Vigilance Over Recreation, Social Intercourse, Books, Media and Ideas 1 Young Souls Soft as Wax Mold into Vice Easily (89) 2 Augustine’s Story of Alipius (Conf. VI, 8) (90) 3 Good: Associations Promoting and Creating Good Books, Magazines, Movies (91) 4 Vigilance Does not Mean Removing Children from Society, but Forewarned/Forearmed 5 Tertullian: “Sharers in the Possession of the World, not of Its Errors” (92)
VI End and Object of Christian Education According to God’s Established Order In the Economy of His Divine Providence [93-99]
A The True Nature of Christian Education as Deduced from Its End, Pre-Eminent Mission of Church
B Cooperate with Divine Grace in Forming the True and Perfect Christian 1 Form Christ in Those Regenerated in Baptism (94) 2 Whole of Human Life: Physical, Spiritual, Intellectual, Moral, Individual, Domestic, Social In Order to Elevate, Regulate and Perfect According to Example and Teaching of Christ (95) 3 Hence the true Christian, product of Christian education, is the supernatural man who thinks, judges and acts constantly and consistently in accordance with right reason illumined by the supernatural light of the example and teaching of Christ; in other words, … the true and finished man of character. For, it is not every kind of consistency and firmness of conduct based on subjective principles that makes true character, but only constancy in following the eternal principles of justice, as is admitted even by the pagan poet when he praises as one and the same "the man who is just and firm of purpose." And on the other hand, there cannot be full justice except in giving to God what is due to God, as the true Christian does. (96) C By Our Fruits We Will Be Known/Judged by the World; Succeed Only if Follow All This (97) D Coordinate Actions of This Life with the Supernatural (98) E Proved in History of Christianity and Its Institution which = True Civilization and Progress Saints Are greatest Benefactors of Society and Models for all Classes and Professions (99)
VII Conclusion [100-102]
A These Fruits of Christian Education Derive from Supernatural Virtue and Life in Christ which Is Formed and Developed in Man
B Christ is Source and Dispenser Thereof, He the Model of Labor and Obedience with Virtues Personal, Domestic and Social, Before God and Men (100)
C O Church, True Mother and Teacher (101)
D O Divine King, May the Fruits of Christian Education Be Gathered in Ever Greater Abundance (102) DIVINI ILLIUS MAGISTRI ENCYCLICAL OF POPE PIUS XI ON CHRISTIAN EDUCATION TO THE PATRIARCHS, PRIMATES, ARCHBISHOPS, BISHOPS, AND OTHER ORDINARIES IN PEACE AND COMMUNION WITH THE APOSTOLIC SEE AND TO ALL THE FAITHFUL OF THE CATHOLIC WORLD.
December 31, 1931
Venerable Brethren and Beloved Children, Health and Apostolic Benediction.
Representative on earth of that divine Master who while embracing in the immensity of His love all mankind, even unworthy sinners, showed nevertheless a special tenderness and affection for children, and expressed Himself in those singularly touching words: "Suffer the little children to come unto Me,"[1] We also on every occasion have endeavored to show the predilection wholly paternal which We bear towards them, particularly by our assiduous care and timely instructions with reference to the Christian education of youth.
2. And so, in the spirit of the Divine Master, We have directed a helpful word, now of admonition, now of exhortation, now of direction, to youths and to their educators, to fathers and mothers, on various points of Christian education, with that solicitude which becomes the common Father of all the Faithful, with an insistence in season and out of season, demanded by our pastoral office and inculcated by the Apostle: "Be instant in season, out of season; reprove, entreat, rebuke in all patience and doctrine."[2] Such insistence is called for in these our times, when, alas, there is so great and deplorable an absence of clear and sound principles, even regarding problems the most fundamental.
3. Now this same general condition of the times, this ceaseless agitation in various ways of the problem of educational rights and systems in different countries, the desire expressed to Us with filial confidence by not a few of yourselves, Venerable Brethren, and by members of your flocks, as well as Our deep affection towards youth above referred to, move Us to turn more directly to this subject, if not to treat it in all its well-nigh inexhaustible range of theory and practice, at least to summarize its main principles, throw full light on its important conclusions, and point out its practical applications.
4. Let this be the record of Our Sacerdotal Jubilee which, with altogether special affection, We wish to dedicate to our beloved youth, and to commend to all those whose office and duty is the work of education.
5. Indeed never has there been so much discussion about education as nowadays; never have exponents of new pedagogical theories been so numerous, or so many methods and means devised, proposed and debated, not merely to facilitate education, but to create a new system infallibly efficacious, and capable of preparing the present generations for that earthly happiness which they so ardently desire. 1
6. The reason is that men, created by God to His image and likeness and destined for Him Who is infinite perfection realize today more than ever amid the most exuberant material progress, the insufficiency of earthly goods to produce true happiness either for the individual or for the nations. And hence they feel more keenly in themselves the impulse towards a perfection that is higher, which impulse is implanted in their rational nature by the Creator Himself. This perfection they seek to acquire by means of education. But many of them with, it would seem, too great insistence on the etymological meaning of the word, pretend to draw education out of human nature itself and evolve it by its own unaided powers. Such easily fall into error, because, instead of fixing their gaze on God, first principle and last end of the whole universe, they fall back upon themselves, becoming attached exclusively to passing things of earth; and thus their restlessness will never cease till they direct their attention and their efforts to God, the goal of all perfection, according to the profound saying of Saint Augustine: "Thou didst create us, O Lord, for Thyself, and our heart is restless till it rest in Thee."[3]
7. It is therefore as important to make no mistake in education, as it is to make no mistake in the pursuit of the last end, with which the whole work of education is intimately and necessarily connected. In fact, since education consists essentially in preparing man for what he must be and for what he must do here below, in order to attain the sublime end for which he was created, it is clear that there can be no true education which is not wholly directed to man's last end, and that in the present order of Providence, since God has revealed Himself to us in the Person of His Only Begotten Son, who alone is "the way, the truth and the life," there can be no ideally perfect education which is not Christian education.
8. From this we see the supreme importance of Christian education, not merely for each individual, but for families and for the whole of human society, whose perfection comes from the perfection of the elements that compose it. From these same principles, the excellence, we may well call it the unsurpassed excellence, of the work of Christian education becomes manifest and clear; for after all it aims at securing the Supreme Good, that is, God, for the souls of those who are being educated, and the maximum of well-being possible here below for human society. And this it does as efficaciously as man is capable of doing it, namely by cooperating with God in the perfecting of individuals and of society, in as much as education makes upon the soul the first, the most powerful and lasting impression for life according to the well-known saying of the Wise Man, "A young man according to his way, even when he is old, he will not depart from it."[4] With good reason therefore did St. John Chrysostom say, "What greater work is there than training the mind and forming the habits of the young?"[5]
9. But nothing discloses to us the supernatural beauty and excellence of the work of Christian education better than the sublime expression of love of our Blessed Lord, identifying Himself with children, "Whosoever shall receive one such child as this in my name, receiveth me."[6]
10. Now in order that no mistake be made in this work of utmost importance, and in order to conduct it in the best manner possible with the help of God's grace, it is necessary to have a clear and definite idea of Christian education in its essential aspects, viz., who has the mission to educate, who are the subjects to be educated, what are the necessary accompanying
2
circumstances, what is the end and object proper to Christian education according to God's established order in the economy of His Divine Providence.
11. Education is essentially a social and not a mere individual activity. Now there are three necessary societies, distinct from one another and yet harmoniously combined by God, into which man is born: two, namely the family and civil society, belong to the natural order; the third, the Church, to the supernatural order.
12. In the first place comes the family, instituted directly by God for its peculiar purpose, the generation and formation of offspring; for this reason it has priority of nature and therefore of rights over civil society. Nevertheless, the family is an imperfect society, since it has not in itself all the means for its own complete development; whereas civil society is a perfect society, having in itself all the means for its peculiar end, which is the temporal well-being of the community; and so, in this respect, that is, in view of the common good, it has pre-eminence over the family, which finds its own suitable temporal perfection precisely in civil society.
13. The third society, into which man is born when through Baptism he reaches the divine life of grace, is the Church; a society of the supernatural order and of universal extent; a perfect society, because it has in itself all the means required for its own end, which is the eternal salvation of mankind; hence it is supreme in its own domain.
14. Consequently, education which is concerned with man as a whole, individually and socially, in the order of nature and in the order of grace, necessarily belongs to all these three societies, in due proportion, corresponding, according to the disposition of Divine Providence, to the co- ordination of their respecting ends.
15. And first of all education belongs preeminently to the Church, by reason of a double title in the supernatural order, conferred exclusively upon her by God Himself; absolutely superior therefore to any other title in the natural order.
16. The first title is founded upon the express mission and supreme authority to teach, given her by her divine Founder: "All power is given to me in heaven and in earth. Going therefore teach ye all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you, and behold I am with you all days, even to the consummation of the world."[7] Upon this magisterial office Christ conferred infallibility, together with the command to teach His doctrine. Hence the Church "was set by her divine Author as the pillar and ground of truth, in order to teach the divine Faith to men, and keep whole and inviolate the deposit confided to her; to direct and fashion men, in all their actions individually and socially, to purity of morals and integrity of life, in accordance with revealed doctrine."[8]
17. The second title is the supernatural motherhood, in virtue of which the Church, spotless spouse of Christ, generates, nurtures and educates souls in the divine life of grace, with her Sacraments and her doctrine. With good reason then does St. Augustine maintain: "He has not God for father who refuses to have the Church as mother."[9] 3
18. Hence it is that in this proper object of her mission, that is, "in faith and morals, God Himself has made the Church sharer in the divine magisterium and, by a special privilege, granted her immunity from error; hence she is the mistress of men, supreme and absolutely sure, and she has inherent in herself an inviolable right to freedom in teaching.'[10] By necessary consequence the Church is independent of any sort of earthly power as well in the origin as in the exercise of her mission as educator, not merely in regard to her proper end and object, but also in regard to the means necessary and suitable to attain that end. Hence with regard to every other kind of human learning and instruction, which is the common patrimony of individuals and society, the Church has an independent right to make use of it, and above all to decide what may help or harm Christian education. And this must be so, because the Church as a perfect society has an independent right to the means conducive to its end, and because every form of instruction, no less than every human action, has a necessary connection with man's last end, and therefore cannot be withdrawn from the dictates of the divine law, of which the Church is guardian, interpreter and infallible mistress.
19. This truth is clearly set forth by Pius X of saintly memory: Whatever a Christian does even in the order of things of earth, he may not overlook the supernatural; indeed he must, according to the teaching of Christian wisdom, direct all things towards the supreme good as to his last end; all his actions, besides, in so far as good or evil in the order of morality, that is, in keeping or not with natural and divine law, fall under the judgment and jurisdiction of the Church.[11]
20. It is worthy of note how a layman, an excellent writer and at the same time a profound and conscientious thinker, has been able to understand well and express exactly this fundamental Catholic doctrine: The Church does not say that morality belongs purely, in the sense of exclusively, to her; but that it belongs wholly to her. She has never maintained that outside her fold and apart from her teaching, man cannot arrive at any moral truth; she has on the contrary more than once condemned this opinion because it has appeared under more forms than one. She does however say, has said, and will ever say, that because of her institution by Jesus Christ, because of the Holy Ghost sent her in His name by the Father, she alone possesses what she has had immediately from God and can never lose, the whole of moral truth, omnem veritatem, in which all individual moral truths are included, as well those which man may learn by the help of reason, as those which form part of revelation or which may be deduced from it.[12]
21. Therefore with full right the Church promotes letters, science, art in so far as necessary or helpful to Christian education, in addition to her work for the salvation of souls: founding and maintaining schools and institutions adapted to every branch of learning and degree of culture.[13] Nor may even physical culture, as it is called, be considered outside the range of her maternal supervision, for the reason that it also is a means which may help or harm Christian education.
22. And this work of the Church in every branch of culture is of immense benefit to families and nations which without Christ are lost, as St. Hilary points out correctly: "What can be more fraught with danger for the world than the rejection of Christ?"[14] Nor does it interfere in the 4
least with the regulations of the State, because the Church in her motherly prudence is not unwilling that her schools and institutions for the education of the laity be in keeping with the legitimate dispositions of civil authority; she is in every way ready to cooperate with this authority and to make provision for a mutual understanding, should difficulties arise.
23. Again it is the inalienable right as well as the indispensable duty of the Church, to watch over the entire education of her children, in all institutions, public or private, not merely in regard to the religious instruction there given, but in regard to every other branch of learning and every regulation in so far as religion and morality are concerned.[15]
24. Nor should the exercise of this right be considered undue interference, but rather maternal care on the part of the Church in protecting her children from the grave danger of all kinds of doctrinal and moral evil. Moreover this watchfulness of the Church not merely can create no real inconvenience, but must on the contrary confer valuable assistance in the right ordering and well-being of families and of civil society; for it keeps far away from youth the moral poison which at that inexperienced and changeable age more easily penetrates the mind and more rapidly spreads its baneful effects. For it is true, as Leo XIII has wisely pointed out, that without proper religious and moral instruction "every form of intellectual culture will be injurious; for young people not accustomed to respect God, will be unable to bear the restraint of a virtuous life, and never having learned to deny themselves anything. they will easily be incited to disturb the public order."[16]
25. The extent of the Church's mission in the field of education is such as to embrace every nation, without exception, according to the command of Christ: "Teach ye all nations;"[17] and there is no power on earth that may lawfully oppose her or stand in her way. In the first place, it extends over all the Faithful, of whom she has anxious care as a tender mother. For these she has throughout the centuries created and conducted an immense number of schools and institutions in every branch of learning. As We said on a recent occasion: Right back in the far-off middle ages when there were so many (some have even said too many) monasteries, convents, churches, collegiate churches, cathedral chapters, etc., there was attached to each a home of study, of teaching, of Christian education. To these we must add all the universities, spread over every country and always by the initiative an under the protection of the Holy See and the Church. That grand spectacle, which today we see better, as it is nearer to us and more imposing because of the conditions of the age, was the spectacle of all times; and they who study and compare historical events remain astounded at what the Church has been able to do in this matter, and marvel at the manner in which she had succeeded in fulfilling her God- given mission to educate generations of men to a Christian life, producing everywhere a magnificent harvest of fruitful results. But if we wonder that the Church in all times has been able to gather about her and educate hundreds, thousands, millions of students, no less wonderful is it to bear in mind what she has done not only in the field of education, but in that also of true and genuine erudition. For, if so many treasures of culture, civilization and literature have escaped destruction, this is due to the action by which the Church, even in times long past and uncivilized, has shed so bright a light in the domain of letters, of philosophy, of art and in a special manner of architecture.[18]
5
26. All this the Church has been able to do because her mission to educate extends equally to those outside the Fold, seeing that all men are called to enter the kingdom of God and reach eternal salvation. Just as today when her missions scatter schools by the thousand in districts and countries not yet Christian, from the banks of the Ganges to the Yellow river and the great islands and archipelagos of the Pacific ocean, from the Dark Continent to the Land of Fire and to frozen Alaska, so in every age the Church by her missionaries has educated to Christian life and to civilization the various peoples which now constitute the Christian nations of the civilized world.
27. Hence it is evident that both by right and in fact the mission to educate belongs preeminently to the Church, and that no one free from prejudice can have a reasonable motive for opposing or impeding the Church in this her work, of which the world today enjoys the precious advantages.
28. This is the more true because the rights of the family and of the State, even the rights of individuals regarding a just liberty in the pursuit of science, of methods of science and all sorts of profane culture, not only are not opposed to this pre-eminence of the Church, but are in complete harmony with it. The fundamental reason for this harmony is that the supernatural order, to which the Church owes her rights, not only does not in the least destroy the natural order, to which pertain the other rights mentioned, but elevates the natural and perfects it, each affording mutual aid to the other, and completing it in a manner proportioned to its respective nature and dignity. The reason is because both come from God, who cannot contradict Himself: "The works of God are perfect and all His ways are judgments."[19]
29. This becomes clearer when we consider more closely and in detail the mission of education proper to the family and to the State.
30. In the first place the Church's mission of education is in wonderful agreement with that of the family, for both proceed from God, and in a remarkably similar manner. God directly communicates to the family, in the natural order, fecundity, which is the principle of life, and hence also the principle of education to life, together with authority, the principle of order.
31. The Angelic Doctor with his wonted clearness of thought and precision of style, says: "The father according to the flesh has in a particular way a share in that principle which in a manner universal is found in God.... The father is the principle of generation, of education and discipline and of everything that bears upon the perfecting of human life."[20]
32. The family therefore holds directly from the Creator the mission and hence the right to educate the offspring, a right inalienable because inseparably joined to the strict obligation, a right anterior to any right whatever of civil society and of the State, and therefore inviolable on the part of any power on earth.
33. That this right is inviolable St. Thomas proves as follows:The child is naturally something of the father . . . so by natural right the child, before reaching the use of reason, is under the father's care. Hence it would be contrary to natural justice if the child, before the use of reason, were removed from the care of its parents, or if any disposition were made concerning him against the 6
will of the parents.[21] And as this duty on the part of the parents continues up to the time when the child is in a position to provide for itself, this same inviolable parental right of education also endures. "Nature intends not merely the generation of the offspring, but also its development and advance to the perfection of man considered as man, that is, to the state of virtue"[22] says the same St. Thomas.
34. The wisdom of the Church in this matter is expressed with precision and clearness in the Codex of Canon Law, can. 1113: "Parents are under a grave obligation to see to the religious and moral education of their children, as well as to their physical and civic training, as far as they can, and moreover to provide for their temporal well-being."[23]
35. On this point the common sense of mankind is in such complete accord, that they would be in open contradiction with it who dared maintain that the children belong to the State before they belong to the family, and that the State has an absolute right over their education. Untenable is the reason they adduce, namely that man is born a citizen and hence belongs primarily to the State, not bearing in mind that before being a citizen man must exist; and existence does not come from the State, but from the parents, as Leo XIII wisely declared: "The children are something of the father, and as it were an extension of the person of the father; and, to be perfectly accurate, they enter into and become part of civil society, not directly by themselves, but through the family in which they were born."[24] "And therefore," says the same Leo XIII, "the father's power is of such a nature that it cannot be destroyed or absorbed by the State; for it has the same origin as human life itself."[25] It does not however follow from this that the parents' right to educate their children is absolute and despotic; for it is necessarily subordinated to the last end and to natural and divine law, as Leo XIII declares in another memorable encyclical, where He thus sums up the rights and duties of parents: "By nature parents have a right to the training of their children, but with this added duty that the education and instruction of the child be in accord with the end for which by God's blessing it was begotten. Therefore it is the duty of parents to make every effort to prevent any invasion of their rights in this matter, and to make absolutely sure that the education of their children remain under their own control in keeping with their Christian duty, and above all to refuse to send them to those schools in which there is danger of imbibing the deadly poison of impiety."[26]
36. It must be borne in mind also that the obligation of the family to bring up children, includes not only religious and moral education, but physical and civic education as well,[27] principally in so far as it touches upon religion and moralit.
37. This incontestable right of the family has at various times been recognized by nations anxious to respect the natural law in their civil enactments. Thus, to give one recent example, the Supreme Court of the United States of America, in a decision on an important controversy, declared that it is not in the competence of the State to fix any uniform standard of education by forcing children to receive instruction exclusively in public schools, and it bases its decision on the natural law: the child is not the mere creature of the State; those who nurture him and direct his destiny have the right coupled with the high duty, to educate him and prepare him for the fulfillment of his obligations.[28] 7
38. History bears witness how, particularly in modern times, the State has violated and does violate rights conferred by God on the family. At the same time it shows magnificently how the Church has ever protected and defended these rights, a fact proved by the special confidence which parents have in Catholic schools. As We pointed out recently in Our letter to the Cardinal Secretary of State: The family has instinctively understood this to be so, and from the earliest days of Christianity down to our own times, fathers and mothers, even those of little or no faith, have been sending or bringing their children in millions to places of education under the direction of the Church.[29]
39. It is paternal instinct, given by God, that thus turns with confidence to the Church, certain of finding in her the protection of family rights, thereby illustrating that harmony with which God has ordered all things. The Church is indeed conscious of her divine mission to all mankind, and of the obligation which all men have to practice the one true religion; and therefore she never tires of defending her right, and of reminding parents of their duty, to have all Catholic-born children baptized and brought up as Christians. On the other hand so jealous is she of the family's inviolable natural right to educate the children, that she never consents, save under peculiar circumstances and with special cautions, to baptize the children of infidels, or provide for their education against the will of the parents, till such time as the children can choose for themselves and freely embrace the Faith.[30]
40. We have therefore two facts of supreme importance. As We said in Our discourse cited above: The Church placing at the disposal of families her office of mistress and educator, and the families eager to profit by the offer, and entrusting their children to the Church in hundreds and thousands. These two facts recall and proclaim a striking truth of the greatest significance in the moral and social order. They declare that the mission of education regards before all, above all, primarily the Church and the family, and this by natural and divine law, and that therefore it cannot be slighted, cannot be evaded, cannot be supplanted.[31]
41. From such priority of rights on the part of the Church and of the family in the field of education, most important advantages, as we have seen, accrue to the whole of society. Moreover in accordance with the divinely established order of things, no damage can follow from it to the true and just rights of the State in regard to the education of its citizens.
42. These rights have been conferred upon civil society by the Author of nature Himself, not by title of fatherhood, as in the case of the Church and of the family, but in virtue of the authority which it possesses to promote the common temporal welfare, which is precisely the purpose of its existence. Consequently education cannot pertain to civil society in the same way in which it pertains to the Church and to the family, but in a different way corresponding to its own particular end and object.
43. Now this end and object, the common welfare in the temporal order, consists in that peace and security in which families and individual citizens have the free exercise of their rights, and at the same time enjoy the greatest spiritual and temporal prosperity possible in this life, by the mutual union and co-ordination of the work of all. The function therefore of the civil authority
8
residing in the State is twofold, to protect and to foster, but by no means to absorb the family and the individual, or to substitute itself for them.
44. Accordingly in the matter of education, it is the right, or to speak more correctly, it is the duty of the State to protect in its legislation, the prior rights, already described, of the family as regards the Christian education of its offspring, and consequently also to respect the supernatural rights of the Church in this same realm of Christian education.
45. It also belongs to the State to protect the rights of the child itself when the parents are found wanting either physically or morally in this respect, whether by default, incapacity or misconduct, since, as has been shown, their right to educate is not an absolute and despotic one, but dependent on the natural and divine law, and therefore subject alike to the authority and jurisdiction of the Church, and to the vigilance and administrative care of the State in view of the common good. Besides, the family is not a perfect society, that is, it has not in itself all the means necessary for its full development. In such cases, exceptional no doubt, the State does not put itself in the place of the family, but merely supplies deficiencies, and provides suitable means, always in conformity with the natural rights of the child and the supernatural rights of the Church.
46. In general then it is the right and duty of the State to protect, according to the rules of right reason and faith, the moral and religious education of youth, by removing public impediments that stand in the way. In the first place it pertains to the State, in view of the common good, to promote in various ways the education and instruction of youth. It should begin by encouraging and assisting, of its own accord, the initiative and activity of the Church and the family, whose successes in this field have been clearly demonstrated by history and experience. It should moreover supplement their work whenever this falls short of what is necessary, even by means of its own schools and institutions. For the State more than any other society is provided with the means put at its disposal for the needs of all, and it is only right that it use these means to the advantage of those who have contributed them.[32]
47. Over and above this, the State can exact and take measures to secure that all its citizens have the necessary knowledge of their civic and political duties, and a certain degree of physical, intellectual and moral culture, which, considering the conditions of our times, is really necessary for the common good.
48. However it is clear that in all these ways of promoting education and instruction, both public and private, the State should respect the inherent rights of the Church and of the family concerning Christian education, and moreover have regard for distributive justice. Accordingly, unjust and unlawful is any monopoly, educational or scholastic, which, physically or morally, forces families to make use of government schools, contrary to the dictates of their Christian conscience, or contrary even to their legitimate preferences.
49. This does not prevent the State from making due provision for the right administration of public affairs and for the protection of its peace, within or without the realm. These are things which directly concern the public good and call for special aptitudes and special preparation. The 9
State may therefore reserve to itself the establishment and direction of schools intended to prepare for certain civic duties and especially for military service, provided it be careful not to injure the rights of the Church or of the family in what pertains to them. It is well to repeat this warning here; for in these days there is spreading a spirit of nationalism which is false and exaggerated, as well as dangerous to true peace and prosperity. Under its influence various excesses are committed in giving a military turn to the so-called physical training of boys (sometimes even of girls, contrary to the very instincts of human nature); or again in usurping unreasonably on Sunday, the time which should be devoted to religious duties and to family life at home. It is not our intention however to condemn what is good in the spirit of discipline and legitimate bravery promoted by these methods; We condemn only what is excessive, as for example violence, which must not be confounded with courage nor with the noble sentiment of military valor in defense of country and public order; or again exaltation of athleticism which even in classic pagan times marked the decline and downfall of genuine physical training.
50. In general also it belongs to civil society and the State to provide what may be called civic education, not only for its youth, but for all ages and classes. This consists in the practice of presenting publicly to groups of individuals information having an intellectual, imaginative and emotional appeal, calculated to draw their wills to what is upright and honest, and to urge its practice by a sort of moral compulsion, positively by disseminating such knowledge, and negatively by suppressing what is opposed to it.[33] This civic education, so wide and varied in itself as to include almost every activity of the State intended for the public good, ought also to be regulated by the norms of rectitude, and therefore cannot conflict with the doctrines of the Church, which is the divinely appointed teacher of these norms.
51. All that we have said so far regarding the activity of the State in educational matters, rests on the solid and immovable foundation of the Catholic doctrine of The Christian Constitution of States set forth in such masterly fashion by Our Predecessor Leo XIII, notably in the Encyclicals Immortale Dei and Sapientiae Christianae. He writes as follows: God has divided the government of the human race between two authorities, ecclesiastical and civil, establishing one over things divine, the other over things human. Both are supreme, each in its own domain; each has its own fixed boundaries which limit its activities. These boundaries are determined by the peculiar nature and the proximate end of each, and describe as it were a sphere within which, with exclusive right, each may develop its influence. As however the same subjects are under the two authorities, it may happen that the same matter, though from a different point of view, may come under the competence and jurisdiction of each of them. If follows that divine Providence, whence both authorities have their origin, must have traced with due order the proper line of action for each. The powers that are, are ordained of God.[34]
52. Now the education of youth is precisely one of those matters that belong both to the Church and to the State, "though in different ways," as explained above. Therefore, continues Leo XIII, between the two powers there must reign a well-ordered harmony. Not without reason may this mutual agreement be compared to the union of body and soul in man. Its nature and extent can only be determined by considering, as we have said, the nature of each of the two powers, and in particular the excellence and nobility of the respective ends. To one is committed directly and specifically the charge of what is helpful in worldly matters; while the other is to concern itself 10
with the things that pertain to heaven and eternity. Everything therefore in human affairs that is in any way sacred, or has reference to the salvation of souls and the worship of God, whether by its nature or by its end, is subject to the jurisdiction and discipline of the Church. Whatever else is comprised in the civil and political order, rightly comes under the authority of the State; for Christ commanded us to give to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's.[35]
53. Whoever refuses to admit these principles, and hence to apply them to education, must necessarily deny that Christ has founded His Church for the eternal salvation of mankind, and maintain instead that civil society and the State are not subject to God and to His law, natural and divine. Such a doctrine is manifestly impious, contrary to right reason, and, especially in this matter of education, extremely harmful to the proper training of youth, and disastrous as well for civil society as for the well-being of all mankind. On the other hand from the application of these principles, there inevitably result immense advantages for the right formation of citizens. This is abundantly proved by the history of every age. Tertullian in his Apologeticus could throw down a challenge to the enemies of the Church in the early days of Christianity, just as St. Augustine did in his; and we today can repeat with him: Let those who declare the teaching of Christ to be opposed to the welfare of the State, furnish us with an army of soldiers such as Christ says soldiers ought to be; let them give us subjects, husbands, wives, parents, children, masters, servants, kings, judges, taxpayers and tax gatherers who live up to the teachings of Christ; and then let them dare assert that Christian doctrine is harmful to the State. Rather let them not hesitate one moment to acclaim that doctrine, rightly observed, the greatest safeguard of the State.[36]
54. While treating of education, it is not out of place to show here how an ecclesiastical writer, who flourished in more recent times, during the Renaissance, the holy and learned Cardinal Silvio Antoniano, to whom the cause of Christian education is greatly indebted, has set forth most clearly this well established point of Catholic doctrine. He had been a disciple of that wonderful educator of youth, St. Philip Neri; he was teacher and Latin secretary to St. Charles Borromeo, and it was at the latter's suggestion and under his inspiration that he wrote his splendid treatise on The Christian Education of Youth. In it he argues as follows: The more closely the temporal power of a nation aligns itself with the spiritual, and the more it fosters and promotes the latter, by so much the more it contributes to the conservation of the commonwealth. For it is the aim of the ecclesiastical authority by the use of spiritual means, to form good Christians in accordance with its own particular end and object; and in doing this it helps at the same time to form good citizens, and prepares them to meet their obligations as members of a civil society. This follows of necessity because in the City of God, the Holy Roman Catholic Church, a good citizen and an upright man are absolutely one and the same thing. How grave therefore is the error of those who separate things so closely united, and who think that they can produce good citizens by ways and methods other than those which make for the formation of good Christians. For, let human prudence say what it likes and reason as it pleases, it is impossible to produce true temporal peace and tranquillity by things repugnant or opposed to the peace and happiness of eternity.[37]
11
55. What is true of the State, is true also of science, scientific methods and scientific research; they have nothing to fear from the full and perfect mandate which the Church holds in the field of education. Our Catholic institutions, whatever their grade in the educational and scientific world, have no need of apology. The esteem they enjoy, the praise they receive, the learned works which they promote and produce in such abundance, and above all, the men, fully and splendidly equipped, whom they provide for the magistracy, for the professions, for the teaching career, in fact for every walk of life, more than sufficiently testify in their favour.[38]
56. These facts moreover present a most striking confirmation of the Catholic doctrine defined by the Vatican Council: Not only is it impossible for faith and reason to be at variance with each other, they are on the contrary of mutual help. For while right reason establishes the foundations of Faith, and, by the help of its light, develops a knowledge of the things of God, Faith on the other hand frees and preserves reason from error and enriches it with varied knowledge. The Church therefore, far from hindering the pursuit of the arts and sciences, fosters and promotes them in many ways. For she is neither ignorant nor unappreciative of the many advantages which flow from them to mankind. On the contrary she admits that just as they come from God, Lord of all knowledge, so too if rightly used, with the help of His grace they lead to God. Nor does she prevent the sciences, each in its own sphere, from making use of principles and methods of their own. Only while acknowledging the freedom due to them, she takes every precaution to prevent them from falling into error by opposition to divine doctrine, or from overstepping their proper limits, and thus invading and disturbing the domain of Faith.[39]
57. This norm of a just freedom in things scientific, serves also as an inviolable norm of a just freedom in things didactic, or for rightly understood liberty in teaching; it should be observed therefore in whatever instruction is imparted to others. Its obligation is all the more binding in justice when there is question of instructing youth. For in this work the teacher, whether public or private, has no absolute right of his own, but only such as has been communicated to him by others. Besides every Christian child or youth has a strict right to instruction in harmony with the teaching of the Church, the pillar and ground of truth. And whoever disturbs the pupil's Faith in any way, does him grave wrong, inasmuch as he abuses the trust which children place in their teachers, and takes unfair advantage of their inexperience and of their natural craving for unrestrained liberty, at once illusory and false.
58. In fact it must never be forgotten that the subject of Christian education is man whole and entire, soul united to body in unity of nature, with all his faculties natural and supernatural, such as right reason and revelation show him to be; man, therefore, fallen from his original estate, but redeemed by Christ and restored to the supernatural condition of adopted son of God, though without the preternatural privileges of bodily immortality or perfect control of appetite. There remain therefore, in human nature the effects of original sin, the chief of which are weakness of will and disorderly inclinations.
59. "Folly is bound up in the heart of a child and the rod of correction shall drive it away."[40] Disorderly inclinations then must be corrected, good tendencies encouraged and regulated from tender childhood, and above all the mind must be enlightened and the will strengthened by 12
supernatural truth and by the means of grace, without which it is impossible to control evil impulses, impossible to attain to the full and complete perfection of education intended by the Church, which Christ has endowed so richly with divine doctrine and with the Sacraments, the efficacious means of grace.
60. Hence every form of pedagogic naturalism which in any way excludes or weakens supernatural Christian formation in the teaching of youth, is false. Every method of education founded, wholly or in part, on the denial or forgetfulness of original sin and of grace, and relying on the sole powers of human nature, is unsound. Such, generally speaking, are those modern systems bearing various names which appeal to a pretended self-government and unrestrained freedom on the part of the child, and which diminish or even suppress the teacher's authority and action, attributing to the child an exclusive primacy of initiative, and an activity independent of any higher law, natural or divine, in the work of his education.
61. If any of these terms are used, less properly, to denote the necessity of a gradually more active cooperation on the part of the pupil in his own education; if the intention is to banish from education despotism and violence, which, by the way, just punishment is not, this would be correct, but in no way new. It would mean only what has been taught and reduced to practice by the Church in traditional Christian education, in imitation of the method employed by God Himself towards His creatures, of whom He demands active cooperation according to the nature of each; for His Wisdom "reacheth from end to end mightily and ordereth all things sweetly."[41]
62. But alas! it is clear from the obvious meaning of the words and from experience, that what is intended by not a few, is the withdrawal of education from every sort of dependence on the divine law. So today we see, strange sight indeed, educators and philosophers who spend their lives in searching for a universal moral code of education, as if there existed no decalogue, no gospel law, no law even of nature stamped by God on the heart of man, promulgated by right reason, and codified in positive revelation by God Himself in the ten commandments. These innovators are wont to refer contemptuously to Christian education as "heteronomous," "passive","obsolete," because founded upon the authority of God and His holy law.
63. Such men are miserably deluded in their claim to emancipate, as they say, the child, while in reality they are making him the slave of his own blind pride and of his disorderly affections, which, as a logical consequence of this false system, come to be justified as legitimate demands of a so-called autonomous nature.
64. But what is worse is the claim, not only vain but false, irreverent and dangerous, to submit to research, experiment and conclusions of a purely natural and profane order, those matters of education which belong to the supernatural order; as for example questions of priestly or religious vocation, and in general the secret workings of grace which indeed elevate the natural powers, but are infinitely superior to them, and may nowise be subjected to physical laws, for "the Spirit breatheth where He will."[42]
13
65. Another very grave danger is that naturalism which nowadays invades the field of education in that most delicate matter of purity of morals. Far too common is the error of those who with dangerous assurance and under an ugly term propagate a so-called sex-education, falsely imagining they can forearm youths against the dangers of sensuality by means purely natural, such as a foolhardy initiation and precautionary instruction for all indiscriminately, even in public; and, worse still, by exposing them at an early age to the occasions, in order to accustom them, so it is argued, and as it were to harden them against such dangers.
66. Such persons grievously err in refusing to recognize the inborn weakness of human nature, and the law of which the Apostle speaks, fighting against the law of the mind;[43] and also in ignoring the experience of facts, from which it is clear that, particularly in young people, evil practices are the effect not so much of ignorance of intellect as of weakness of a will exposed to dangerous occasions, and unsupported by the means of grace.
67. In this extremely delicate matter, if, all things considered, some private instruction is found necessary and opportune, from those who hold from God the commission to teach and who have the grace of state, every precaution must be taken. Such precautions are well known in traditional Christian education, and are adequately described by Antoniano cited above, when he says: Such is our misery and inclination to sin, that often in the very things considered to be remedies against sin, we find occasions for and inducements to sin itself. Hence it is of the highest importance that a good father, while discussing with his son a matter so delicate, should be well on his guard and not descend to details, nor refer to the various ways in which this infernal hydra destroys with its poison so large a portion of the world; otherwise it may happen that instead of extinguishing this fire, he unwittingly stirs or kindles it in the simple and tender heart of the child. Speaking generally, during the period of childhood it suffices to employ those remedies which produce the double effect of opening the door to the virtue of purity and closing the door upon vice.[44]
68. False also and harmful to Christian education is the so-called method of "coeducation." This too, by many of its supporters, is founded upon naturalism and the denial of original sin; but by all, upon a deplorable confusion of ideas that mistakes a leveling promiscuity and equality, for the legitimate association of the sexes. The Creator has ordained and disposed perfect union of the sexes only in matrimony, and, with varying degrees of contact, in the family and in society. Besides there is not in nature itself, which fashions the two quite different in organism, in temperament, in abilities, anything to suggest that there can be or ought to be promiscuity, and much less equality, in the training of the two sexes. These, in keeping with the wonderful designs of the Creator, are destined to complement each other in the family and in society, precisely because of their differences, which therefore ought to be maintained and encouraged during their years of formation, with the necessary distinction and corresponding separation, according to age and circumstances. These principles, with due regard to time and place, must, in accordance with Christian prudence, be applied to all schools, particularly in the most delicate and decisive period of formation, that, namely, of adolescence; and in gymnastic exercises and deportment, special care must be had of Christian modesty in young women and girls, which is so gravely impaired by any kind of exhibition in public.
14
69. Recalling the terrible words of the Divine Master: "Woe to the world because of scandals!"[45] We most earnestly appeal to your solicitude and your watchfulness, Venerable Brethren, against these pernicious errors, which, to the immense harm of youth, are spreading far and wide among Christian peoples.
70. In order to obtain perfect education, it is of the utmost importance to see that all those conditions which surround the child during the period of his formation, in other words that the combination of circumstances which we call environment, correspond exactly to the end proposed.
71. The first natural and necessary element in this environment, as regards education, is the family, and this precisely because so ordained by the Creator Himself. Accordingly that education, as a rule, will be more effective and lasting which is received in a well-ordered and well-disciplined Christian family; and more efficacious in proportion to the clear and constant good example set, first by the parents, and then by the other members of the household.
72. It is not our intention to treat formally the question of domestic education, nor even to touch upon its principal points. The subject is too vast. Besides there are not lacking special treatises on this topic by authors, both ancient and modern, well known for their solid Catholic doctrine. One which seems deserving of special mention is the golden treatise already referred to, of Antoniano, On the Christian Education of Youth, which St. Charles Borromeo ordered to be read in public to parents assembled in their churches.
73. Nevertheless, Venerable Brethren and beloved children, We wish to call your attention in a special manner to the present-day lamentable decline in family education. The offices and professions of a transitory and earthly life, which are certainly of far less importance, are prepared for by long and careful study; whereas for the fundamental duty and obligation of educating their children, many parents have little or no preparation, immersed as they are in temporal cares. The declining influence of domestic environment is further weakened by another tendency, prevalent almost everywhere today, which, under one pretext or another, for economic reasons, or for reasons of industry, trade or politics, causes children to be more and more frequently sent away from home even in their tenderest years. And there is a country where the children are actually being torn from the bosom of the family, to be formed (or, to speak more accurately, to be deformed and depraved) in godless schools and associations, to irreligion and hatred, according to the theories of advanced socialism; and thus is renewed in a real and more terrible manner the slaughter of the Innocents.
74. For the love of Our Savior .Jesus Christ, therefore, we implore pastors of souls, by every means in their power, by instructions and catechisms, by word of mouth and written articles widely distributed, to warn Christian parents of their grave obligations. And this should be done not in a merely theoretical and general way, but with practical and specific application to the various responsibilities of parents touching the religious, moral and civil training of their children, and with indication of the methods best adapted to make their training effective, supposing always the influence of their own exemplary lives. The Apostle of the Gentiles did not hesitate to descend to such details of practical instruction in his epistles, especially in the Epistle 15
to the Ephesians, where among other things he gives this advice: "And you, fathers, provoke not your children to anger."[46] This fault is the result not so much of excessive severity, as of impatience and of ignorance of means best calculated to effect a desired correction; it is also due to the all too common relaxation of parental discipline which fails to check the growth of evil passions in the hearts of the younger generation. Parents therefore, and all who take their place in the work of education, should be careful to make right use of the authority given them by God, whose vicars in a true sense they are. This authority is not given for their own advantage, but for the proper up-bringing of their children in a holy and filial "fear of God, the beginning of wisdom," on which foundation alone all respect for authority can rest securely; and without which, order, tranquillity and prosperity, whether in the family or in society, will be impossible.
75. To meet the weakness of man's fallen nature, God in His Goodness has provided the abundant helps of His grace and the countless means with which He has endowed the Church, the great family of Christ. The Church therefore is the educational environment most intimately and harmoniously associated with the Christian family.
76. This educational environment of the Church embraces the Sacraments, divinely efficacious means of grace, the sacred ritual, so wonderfully instructive, and the material fabric of her churches, whose liturgy and art have an immense educational value; but it also includes the great number and variety of schools, associations and institutions of all kinds, established for the training of youth in Christian piety, together with literature and the sciences, not omitting recreation and physical culture. And in this inexhaustible fecundity of educational works, how marvelous, how incomparable is the Church's maternal providence! So admirable too is the harmony which she maintains with the Christian family, that the Church and the family may be said to constitute together one and the same temple of Christian education.
77. Since however the younger generations must be trained in the arts and sciences for the advantage and prosperity of civil society, and since the family of itself is unequal to this task, it was necessary to create that social institution, the school. But let it be borne in mind that this institution owes its existence to the initiative of the family and of the Church, long before it was undertaken by the State. Hence considered in its historical origin, the school is by its very nature an institution subsidiary and complementary to the family and to the Church. It follows logically and necessarily that it must not be in opposition to, but in positive accord with those other two elements, and form with them a perfect moral union, constituting one sanctuary of education, as it were, with the family and the Church. Otherwise it is doomed to fail of its purpose, and to become instead an agent of destruction.
78. This principle we find recognized by a layman, famous for his pedagogical writings, though these because of their liberalism cannot be unreservedly praised. "The school," he writes, "if not a temple, is a den." And again: "When literary, social, domestic and religious education do not go hand in hand, man is unhappy and helpless."[47]
79. From this it follows that the so-called "neutral" or "lay" school, from which religion is excluded, is contrary to the fundamental principles of education. Such a school moreover cannot exist in practice; it is bound to become irreligious. There is no need to repeat what Our 16
Predecessors have declared on this point, especially Pius IX and Leo XIII, at times when laicism was beginning in a special manner to infest the public school. We renew and confirm their declarations,[48] as well as the Sacred Canons in which the frequenting of non-Catholic schools, whether neutral or mixed, those namely which are open to Catholics and non-Catholics alike, is forbidden for Catholic children, and can be at most tolerated, on the approval of the Ordinary alone, under determined circumstances of place and time, and with special precautions.[49] Neither can Catholics admit that other type of mixed school, (least of all the so-called "école unique," obligatory on all), in which the students are provided with separate religious instruction, but receive other lessons in common with non-Catholic pupils from non-Catholic teachers.
80. For the mere fact that a school gives some religious instruction (often extremely stinted), does not bring it into accord with the rights of the Church and of the Christian family, or make it a fit place for Catholic students. To be this, it is necessary that all the teaching and the whole organization of the school, and its teachers, syllabus and text-books in every branch, be regulated by the Christian spirit, under the direction and maternal supervision of the Church; so that Religion may be in very truth the foundation and crown of the youth's entire training; and this in every grade of school, not only the elementary, but the intermediate and the higher institutions of learning as well. To use the words of Leo XIII: It is necessary not only that religious instruction be given to the young at certain fixed times, but also that every other subject taught, be permeated with Christian piety. If this is wanting, if this sacred atmosphere does not pervade and warm the hearts of masters and scholars alike, little good can be expected from any kind of learning, and considerable harm will often be the consequence.[50]
81. And let no one say that in a nation where there are different religious beliefs, it is impossible to provide for public instruction otherwise than by neutral or mixed schools. In such a case it becomes the duty of the State, indeed it is the easier and more reasonable method of procedure, to leave free scope to the initiative of the Church and the family, while giving them such assistance as justice demands. That this can be done to the full satisfaction of families, and to the advantage of education and of public peace and tranquillity, is clear from the actual experience of some countries comprising different religious denominations. There the school legislation respects the rights of the family, and Catholics are free to follow their own system of teaching in schools that are entirely Catholic. Nor is distributive justice lost sight of, as is evidenced by the financial aid granted by the State to the several schools demanded by the families.
82. In other countries of mixed creeds, things are otherwise, and a heavy burden weighs upon Catholics, who under the guidance of their Bishops and with the indefatigable cooperation of the clergy, secular and regular, support Catholic schools for their children entirely at their own expense; to this they feel obliged in conscience, and with a generosity and constancy worthy of all praise, they are firmly determined to make adequate provision for what they openly profess as their motto: "Catholic education in Catholic schools for all the Catholic youth." If such education is not aided from public funds, as distributive justice requires, certainly it may not be opposed by any civil authority ready to recognize the rights of the family, and the irreducible claims of legitimate liberty.
17
83. Where this fundamental liberty is thwarted or interfered with, Catholics will never feel, whatever may have been the sacrifices already made, that they have done enough, for the support and defense of their schools and for the securing of laws that will do them justice.
84. For whatever Catholics do in promoting and defending the Catholic school for their children, is a genuinely religious work and therefore an important task of "Catholic Action." For this reason the associations which in various countries are so zealously engaged in this work of prime necessity, are especially dear to Our paternal heart and are deserving of every commendation.
85. Let it be loudly proclaimed and well understood and recognized by all, that Catholics, no matter what their nationality, in agitating for Catholic schools for their children, are not mixing in party politics, but are engaged in a religious enterprise demanded by conscience. They do not intend to separate their children either from the body of the nation or its spirit, but to educate them in a perfect manner, most conducive to the prosperity of the nation. Indeed a good Catholic, precisely because of his Catholic principles, makes the better citizen, attached to his country, and loyally submissive to constituted civil authority in every legitimate form of government.
86. In such a school, in harmony with the Church and the Christian family, the various branches of secular learning will not enter into conflict with religious instruction to the manifest detriment of education. And if, when occasion arises, it be deemed necessary to have the students read authors propounding false doctrine, for the purpose of refuting it, this will be done after due preparation and with such an antidote of sound doctrine, that it will not only do no harm, but will an aid to the Christian formation of youth.
87. In such a school moreover, the study of the vernacular and of classical literature will do no damage to moral virtue. There the Christian teacher will imitate the bee, which takes the choicest part of the flower and leaves the rest, as St. Basil teaches in his discourse to youths on the study of the classics.[51] Nor will this necessary caution, suggested also by the pagan Quintilian,[52] in any way hinder the Christian teacher from gathering and turning to profit, whatever there is of real worth in the systems and methods of our modern times, mindful of the Apostle's advice: "Prove all things: hold fast that which is good."[53] Hence in accepting the new, he will not hastily abandon the old, which the experience of centuries has found expedient and profitable. This is particularly true in the teaching of Latin, which in our days is falling more and more into disuse, because of the unreasonable rejection of methods so successfully used by that sane humanism, whose highest development was reached in the schools of the Church. These noble traditions of the past require that the youth committed to Catholic schools be fully instructed in the letters and sciences in accordance with the exigencies of the times. They also demand that the doctrine imparted be deep and solid, especially in sound philosophy, avoiding the muddled superficiality of those "who perhaps would have found the necessary, had they not gone in search of the superfluous."[54] In this connection Christian teachers should keep in mind what Leo XIII says in a pithy sentence: Greater stress must be laid on the employment of apt and solid methods of teaching, and, what is still more important, on bringing into full conformity with the Catholic faith, what is taught in literature, in the sciences, and above all in philosophy, on which depends in great part the right orientation of the other branches of knowledge.[55] 18
88. Perfect schools are the result not so much of good methods as of good teachers, teachers who are thoroughly prepared and well-grounded in the matter they have to teach; who possess the intellectual and moral qualifications required by their important office; who cherish a pure and holy love for the youths confided to them, because they love Jesus Christ and His Church, of which these are the children of predilection; and who have therefore sincerely at heart the true good of family and country. Indeed it fills Our soul with consolation and gratitude towards the divine Goodness to see, side by side with religious men and women engaged in teaching, such a large number of excellent lay teachers, who, for their greater spiritual advancement, are often grouped in special sodalities and associations, which are worthy of praise and encouragement as most excellent and powerful auxiliaries of "Catholic Action." All these labor unselfishly with zeal and perseverance in what St. Gregory Nazianzen calls "the art of arts and the science of sciences,"[56] the direction and formation of youth. Of them also it may be said in the words of the divine Master: "The harvest indeed is great, but the laborers few."[57] Let us then pray the Lord of the harvest to send more such workers into the field of Christian education; and let their formation be one of the principal concerns of the pastors of souls and of the superiors of Religious Orders.
89. It is no less necessary to direct and watch the education of the adolescent, "soft as wax to be moulded into vice,"[58] in whatever other environment he may happen to be, removing occasions of evil and providing occasions for good in his recreations and social intercourse; for "evil communications corrupt good manners."[59]
90. More than ever nowadays an extended and careful vigilance is necessary, inasmuch as the dangers of moral and religious shipwreck are greater for inexperienced youth. Especially is this true of impious and immoral books, often diabolically circulated at low prices; of the cinema, which multiplies every kind of exhibition; and now also of the radio, which facilitates every kind of communications. These most powerful means of publicity, which can be of great utility for instruction and education when directed by sound principles, are only too often used as an incentive to evil passions and greed for gain. St. Augustine deplored the passion for the shows of the circus which possessed even some Christians of his time, and he dramatically narrates the infatuation for them, fortunately only temporary, of his disciple and friend Alipius.[60] How often today must parents and educators bewail the corruption of youth brought about by the modern theater and the vile book!
91. Worthy of all praise and encouragement therefore are those educational associations which have for their object to point out to parents and educators, by means of suitable books and periodicals, the dangers to morals and religion that are often cunningly disguised in books and theatrical representations. In their spirit of zeal for the souls of the young, they endeavor at the same time to circulate good literature and to promote plays that are really instructive, going so far as to put up at the cost of great sacrifices, theaters and cinemas, in which virtue will have nothing to suffer and much to gain.
92. This necessary vigilance does not demand that young people be removed from the society in which they must live and save their souls; but that today more than ever they should be forewarned and forearmed as Christians against the seductions and the errors of the world, 19
which, as Holy Writ admonishes us, is all "concupiscence of the flesh, concupiscence of the eyes and pride of life."[61] Let them be what Tertullian wrote of the first Christians, and what Christians of all times ought to be, "sharers in the possession of the world, not of its error."[62]
93. This saying of Tertullian brings us to the topic which we propose to treat in the last place, and which is of the greatest importance, that is, the true nature of Christian education, as deduced from its proper end. Its consideration reveals with noonday clearness the pre-eminent educational mission of the Church.
94. The proper and immediate end of Christian education is to cooperate with divine grace in forming the true and perfect Christian, that is, to form Christ Himself in those regenerated by Baptism, according to the emphatic expression of the Apostle: "My little children, of whom I am in labor again, until Christ be formed in you."[63] For the true Christian must live a supernatural life in Christ: "Christ who is your life,"[64] and display it in all his actions: "That the life also of Jesus may be made manifest in our mortal flesh."[65]
95. For precisely this reason, Christian education takes in the whole aggregate of human life, physical and spiritual, intellectual and moral, individual, domestic and social, not with a view of reducing it in any way, but in order to elevate, regulate and perfect it, in accordance with the example and teaching of Christ.
96. Hence the true Christian, product of Christian education, is the supernatural man who thinks, judges and acts constantly and consistently in accordance with right reason illumined by the supernatural light of the example and teaching of Christ; in other words, to use the current term, the true and finished man of character. For, it is not every kind of consistency and firmness of conduct based on subjective principles that makes true character, but only constancy in following the eternal principles of justice, as is admitted even by the pagan poet when he praises as one and the same "the man who is just and firm of purpose."[66] And on the other hand, there cannot be full justice except in giving to God what is due to God, as the true Christian does.
97. The scope and aim of Christian education as here described, appears to the worldly as an abstraction, or rather as something that cannot be attained without the suppression or dwarfing of the natural faculties, and without a renunciation of the activities of the present life, and hence inimical to social life and temporal prosperity, and contrary to all progress in letters, arts and sciences, and all the other elements of civilization. To a like objection raised by the ignorance and the prejudice of even cultured pagans of a former day, and repeated with greater frequency and insistence in modern times, Tertullian has replied as follows: We are not strangers to life.We are fully aware of the gratitude we owe to God, our Lord and Creator. We reject none of the fruits of His handiwork; we only abstain from their immoderate or unlawful use. We are living in the world with you; we do not shun your forum, your markets, your baths, your shops, your factories, your stables, your places of business and traffic. We take shop with you and we serve in your armies; we are farmers and merchants with you; we interchange skilled labor and display our works in public for your service. How we can seem unprofitable to you with whom we live and of whom we are, I know not.[67]
20
98. The true Christian does not renounce the activities of this life, he does not stunt his natural faculties; but he develops and perfects them, by coordinating them with the supernatural. He thus ennobles what is merely natural in life and secures for it new strength in the material and temporal order, no less then in the spiritual and eternal.
99. This fact is proved by the whole history of Christianity and its institutions, which is nothing else but the history of true civilization and progress up to the present day. It stands out conspicuously in the lives of the numerous Saints, whom the Church, and she alone, produces, in whom is perfectly realized the purpose of Christian education, and who have in every way ennobled and benefited human society. Indeed, the Saints have ever been, are, and ever will be the greatest benefactors of society, and perfect models for every class and profession, for every state and condition of life, from the simple and uncultured peasant to the master of sciences and letters, from the humble artisan to the commander of armies, from the father of a family to the ruler of peoples and nations, from simple maidens and matrons of the domestic hearth to queens and empresses. What shall we say of the immense work which has been accomplished even for the temporal well-being of men by missionaries of the Gospel, who have brought and still bring to barbarous tribes the benefits of civilization together with the light of the Faith? What of the founders of so many social and charitable institutions, of the vast numbers of saintly educators, men and women, who have perpetuated and multiplied their life work, by leaving after them prolific institutions of Christian education, in aid of families and for the inestimable advantage of nations?
100. Such are the fruits of Christian education. Their price and value is derived from the supernatural virtue and life in Christ which Christian education forms and develops in man. Of this life and virtue Christ our Lord and Master is the source and dispenser. By His example He is at the same time the universal model accessible to all, especially to the young in the period of His hidden life, a life of labor and obedience, adorned with all virtues, personal, domestic and social, before God and men.
101. Now all this array of priceless educational treasures which We have barely touched upon, is so truly a property of the Church as to form her very substance, since she is the mystical body of Christ, the immaculate spouse of Christ, and consequently a most admirable mother and an incomparable and perfect teacher. This thought inspired St. Augustine, the great genius of whose blessed death we are about to celebrate the fifteenth centenary, with accents of tenderest love for so glorious a mother: O Catholic Church, true Mother of Christians! Not only doest thou preach to us, as is meet, how purely and chastely we are to worship God Himself, Whom to possess is life most blessed; thou does moreover so cherish neighborly love and charity, that all the infirmities to which sinful souls are subject, find their most potent remedy in thee. Childlike thou are in molding the child, strong with the young man, gentle with the aged, dealing with each according to his needs of mind of body. Thou does subject child to parent in a sort of free servitude, and settest parent over child in a jurisdiction of love. Thou bindest brethren to brethren by the bond of religion, stronger and closer then the bond of blood .... Thou unitest citizen to citizen, nation to nation, yea, all men, in a union not of companionship only, but of brotherhood, reminding them of their common origin. Thou teachest kings to care for their people, and biddest people to be subject to their 21
kings. Thou teachest assiduously to whom honor is due, to whom love, to whom reverence, to whom fear, to whom comfort, to whom rebuke, to whom punishment; showing us that whilst not all things nor the same things are due to all, charity is due to all and offense to none.[68]
102. Let us then, Venerable Brethren, raise our hands and our hearts in supplication to heaven, "to the Shepherd and Bishop of our Souls,"[69] to the divine King "who gives laws to rulers," that in His almighty power He may cause these splendid fruits of Christian education to be gathered in ever greater abundance "in the whole world," for the lasting benefit of individuals and of nations.
As a pledge of these heavenly favors, with paternal affection We impart to you, Venerable Brethren, to your clergy and your people, the Apostolic Benediction.
Given at Rome, at St. Peter's, the thirty-first day of December, in the year 1929, the eighth of Our Pontificate.
PIUS XI
1. Marc., X, 14: Sinite parvulos venir ad me.
2. II Tim., IV, 2: Insta opportune importune: argue, obsecra increpa in omni patientia et doctrina.
3. Confess., I, I: Fecisti nos, Domine, ad Te. et inquietum est cor nostrum donec requiescat in Te.
4. Prov. XXII, 6: Adolescens iuxta viam suam etiam cum senuerit non recedet ab ea.
5. Hom. 60, in c. 18 Matth.: Ouid maius quam animis moderari, quam adolescentulorum fingere mores?
6. Marc., IX, 36: Quisquis unum ex huiusmodi pueris receperit in nomine meo, me recipit.
7. Matth., XXVIII, 18-20: Data est mihi omnis potestas in caelo et in terra. Euntes ergo docete omnes gentes, baptizantes eos in nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti: docentes eos servare omnia quaecumque mandavi vobis. Et ecce ego vobiscum sum omnibus diebus usque ad consummationem saeculi.
8. Pius IX, Ep. Quum non sine, 14 Iul, 1864: Columna et firmamentum viritatis a Divino suo Auctore fuit constituta, ut omnes homines divinam edoceat fidem, eiusque depositum sibi traditum integrum inviolatumque custodiat, ac homines eotumque consortia et actiones ad morum honestatem vitaeque integritatem, iuxta revelatae doctrinae normam, dirigat et fingat.
9. De Symbolo ad catech., XIII: Non habebit Deum patrem, qui Ecclesiam noluerit habere matrem.
22
10. Ep. enc. Libertas, 20 Iun. 1888: in fide atque in institutione morum, divini magisterii Ecclesiam fecit Deus ipse participem, eamdemque divino eius beneficio falli nesciam: quare magistra mortalium est maxima ac tutissima, in eaque inest non violabile ius ad magisterii libertatem.
11. Ep. enc. Singulari quadam. 24 Sept. 1912: Quidquid homo christianus agat, etiam in ordine rerum terrenarum, non ei licet bona negligere quae sunt supra naturam, immo oportet ad summum bonum, tamquam ad ultimum finem, ex christianae sapientiae praescriptis omnia dirigat: omnes autem actiones eius, quatenus bonae aut malae sunt in genere morum, id est cum iure naturali et divino congruunt aut discrepant, indicio et iurisdictioni Ecclesiae subsunt.
12. A. Manzoni, Osservazioni sulla Morale Cattolica, c. III.
13. Codex luris Canonici, c. 1375.
14. Commentar. in Matth., cap. 18: Quid mundo tam periculosum quam non recepisse Christum?
15. Cod. I.C., cc. 1381, 1382.
16. Ep. enc. Nobilissima Gallorum Gens, 8 Febr. 1884: male sana omnis futura est animarum cultura: insueti ad verecundiam Dei adolescentes nullam ferre poterunt honeste vivendi disciplinam, suisque cupiditatibus nihil unquam negare ausi, facile ad miscendas civitates pertrahentur.
17. Matth., XXVIII, 19: docete omnes gentes.
18. Discourse to the students of Mondragone College, May 14,1929.
19. Deut., XXXII, 4: Dei perfecta sunt opera, et omnes viae eius indicia.
20. S. Th., 2-2, Q. CII, a. I: Carnalis pater particulariter participat rationem principii quae universaliter invenitur in Deo. . . . Pater est principium et generationis et educatonis et disciplinae, et omnium quae ad perfectionem humanae vitae pertinent.
21. S. Th., 2-2, Q. X, a. 12: Filius enim naturaliter est aliquid patris . . .; ita de iure naturali est quod filius, antequam habeat usum rationis, sit sub cura patris. Unde contra iustitiam naturalem esset, si puer, antequam habeat usum rationis, a cura parentum subtrahatur, vel de eo aliquid ordinetur invitis parentibus.
22. Suppl. S. Th. 3; p. Q. 41, a. 1: Non enim intendit natura solum generationem prolis, sed etiam traductionem et promotionem usque ad perfectum statum hominis in quantum homo est, qui est virtutis status.
23
23. Cod. I. C. , c. 1113: Parentes gravissima obligatione tenentur prolis educationem tum religiosam et moralem, tum physicam et civilem pro viribus curandi, et etiam temporali eorum bono providendi.
24. Ep. enc. Rerum novarum, 15 Maii 1891: Filii sunt aliquid patris, et velut paternae amplificatio quaedam personae proprieque loqui si volumus, non ipsi per se, sed per communitatem domesticam, in qua generati sunt, civilem ineunt ac participant societatem.
25. Ep. enc. Rerum novarum, 15 Maii 1891: Patria potestas est eiusmodi, ut nec extingui, neque absorberi a republica possit, quia idem et commune habet cum ipsa hominum vita principium .
26. Ep. enc. Sapientiae christianae, 10 Ian. 1890: Natura parentes habent ius suum instituendi, quos procrearint, hoc adiuncto officio, ut cum fine, cuius gratia sobolem Dei beneficio susceperunt, ipsa educatio conveniat et doctrina puerilis. Igitur parentibus est necessanum eniti et contendere, ut omnem in hoc genere propulsent iniuriam, omninoque pervincant ut sua in potestate sit educere liberos, uti par est, more christiano, maximeque prohibere scholis iis, a quibus periculum est ne malum venenum imbibant impietatis.
27. Cod I. C.,c.1113.
28. "The fundamental theory of liberty upon which all governments in this Union repose excludes any general power of the State to standardize its children by forcing them to accept instruction from public teachers only. The child is not the mere creature of the State; those who nurture him and direct his destiny have the right coupled with the high duty, to recognize, and prepare him for additional duties." U.S. Supreme Court Decision in the Oregon School Case, June 1, 1925.
29. Letter to the Cardinal Secretary of State, May 30, 1929.
30. Cod. I. C., c. 750, & 2. S. Th., 2, 2. Q. X., a. 12.
31. Discourse to the students of Mondragone College, May 14,1929.
32. Discourse to the students of Mondragone College, May 14,1929.
33. P. L. Taparelli, Saggio teor. di Diritto Naturale, n. 922; a work never sufficiently praised and recommended to university students (Cfr. Our Discourse of Dec. 18, 1927).
34. Ep. enc. Immortale Dei, 1 Nov. 1885: Deus humani generis procurationem inter duos potestates partitus est, scilicet eccesiasticam et civilem, alteram quidem divinis, alteram humanis rebus praepositam. Utraque est in suo genere maxima: habet utraque certos, quibus contineatur, terminos, eosque sua cuiusque natura causaque proxime definitos; unde aliquis velut orbis circumscribitur, in quo sua cuiusque actio iure proprio versetur. Sed quia utriusque imperium est in eosdem, cum usuvenire possit, ut res una atque eadem quamquam aliter atque aliter, sed tamen eadem res, ad utriusque ius iudiciumque pertineat, debet providentissimus Deus, a quo 24
sunt ambae constitutae, utriusque itinera recte atque ordine composiusse. Quae autem sunt, a Deo ordinatae sunt (Rom., XIII, 1).
35. Ep. enc. Immortale Dei, 1 Nov. 1885: Itaque inter utramque potestatem quaedam intercedat necesse est ordinata colligatio: quae quidem coniunctioni non immerito comparatur, per quam anima et corpus in homine copulantur. Qualis autem et quanta ea sit, aliter iudicari non potest, nisi respiciendo, uti diximus, ad utriusque naturam, habendaque ratione excellentiae et nobilitatis causarum; cum alteri proxime maximeque propositum sit rerum mortalium curare commoda, alteri caelestia ac sempiterna bona comparare. Quidquid igitur est in rebus humanis quoquo modo sacrum, quidquid ad salutem animorum cultumve Dei pertinet, sive tale illud sit natura sua, sive rursus tale intelligatur propter caussam ad quam refertur, id est omne in potestate arbitrioque Ecclesiae: cetera vero, quae civile et politicum genus complectitur, rectum est civili auctoritati esse subiecta, cum lesus Christus iusserit, quae Caesaris sint, reddi Caesari, quae Dei, Deo.
36. Ep. 138: Proinde qui doctrinam Christi adversam dicunt esse reipublicae, dent exercitum talem, quales doctrinas Christi esse milites iussit; dent tales provinciales, tales maritos, tales coniuges, tales parentes, tales filios, tales dominos, tales servos, tales reges, tales iudices, tales denique debitorum ipsius fisci redditores et exactores, quales esse praecipit doctrina christiana, et audeant eam dicere adversam esse reipublicae, ima vero non dubitent eam confiteri magnam, si obtemperetur, salutem esse reiublicae.
37. Dell 'educaz. crist., lib. I, c. 43.
38. Letter to the Cardinal Secretary of State, May 30, 1929.
39. Conc. Vat., Sess. 3, cap. 4. Neque solum fides et ratio inter se dissidere nunquam possunt, sed opem quoque sibi mutuam ferunt, cum recta ratio fidei fundamenta demonstret eiusque lumine illustrata rerum divinarum scientiam excolat, fides vero rationem ab erroribus liberet ac tueatur eamque multiplici cognitione instruat. Quapropter tantum abest. ut Ecclesia humanarum artium et disciplinarium culturae obsistat, ut hanc multis modis invet atque promoveat. Non enim commoda ab iis ad hominum vitam dimanantia aut ignorat aut dispicit; fatetur immo, eas, quemadmodum a Deo scientiarum Domino profectae sunt, ita, si rite pertractentur, ad Deum iuvante eius gratia perducere. Nec sane ipsa vetat, ne huiusmodi disciplinae in suo quaeque ambitu propriis utantur principiis et propria methodo; sed iustam hanc libertatem agnoscens, id sedulo cavet, ne divinae doctrinae repugnando errores in se suscipiant, aut fines proprios transgressae ea, quae sunt fidei, occupent et perturbent.
40. Prov., XXII, 15: Stultitia colligata est in corde pueri: et virga disciplinae fugabit eam.
41. Sap., VIII, 1: attingit a fine usque ad finem fortiter, et disponit omnia suaviter.
42. Io., III, 8: Spiritus ubi vult spirat.
43. Rom., VII, 23. 25
44. Silvio Antonio, Dell 'educazione cristiana dei figliuoli, lib. II, e. 88.
45. Matth., XVIII, 7: Vae mundo a scandalis!
46. Eph., VI, 4: Patres, nolite ad iracundiam provocare filios vestros.
47. Nic. Tommaseo, Pensieri sull 'educazione, Parte I, 3, 6.
48. Pius IX, Ep. Quum non sine, 14 Jul. 1864. - Syllabus, Prop. 48. - Leo XIII, alloc. Summi Pontificatus, 20 Aug. 1880, Ep. enc. Nobilissima, 8 Febr. 1884, Ep. enc. Quod multum, 22 Aug. 1886, Ep. Officio sanctissimo, 22 Dec. 1887, Ep. enc. Caritatis, 19 Mart. 1894, etc. (cfr. Cod. I.C. cum. Fontium Annot., c. 1374).
49. Cod. I.C., c. 1374.
50. Ep. enc. Militantis Ecclesiae, 1 Aug. 1897: Necesse est non modo certis horis doceri iuvenes religionem, sed reliquam institutionem omnem christianae pietatis sensus redolere. Id si desit, si sacer hic halitus non doctorum animos ac discentum pervadat foveatque, exiguae capientur ex qualibet doctrina utilitates; damna saepe consequentur haud exigua.
51. P.G., t. 31, 570.
52. Inst. Or., I, 8.
53. I Thess., V, 21: omnia probate; quod bonum est tenete.
54. Seneca, Epist. 45: invenissent forsitan necessaria nisi et superflua quaesiissent.
55. Leo XII, Ep. enc., Insrutabli 21 Apr. 1878: . . .alacrius adnitendum est, ut non solum apta ac solida institutionis methodus, sed maxime institutio ipsa catholicae fidei omnino confommis in litteris et disciplinis vigeat, praesertim autem in philosophia, ex qua recta aliarum scientiarum ratio magna ex parte dependet.
56. Oratio II, P.G., t. 35, 426: ars artium et scientia scientiarvum.
57. Matth., IX, 37: Messis quidem multa, operarii autem pauci.
58. Horat., Art. poet., v. 163: cereus in vitium flecti.
59. I Cor. XV, 33: corrumpunt mores bonos colloquia mala.
60. Conf., VI, 8.
61. I lo., II, 16: concupiscentia carnis, concupiscentia oculorum et superbia vitae.
26
62. De Idololatria, 14: compossessores mundi, non erroris.
63. Gal., IV, 19: Filioli mei, quos iterum parturio, donec formetur Christus in vobis.
64. Col., III, 4: Christus, vita vestra.
65. II Cor., IV, II: ut et vita lesu manifestetur in carne nostra mortali.
66. Horat., Od., 1,III, od. 3, v. 1: lustum et tenacem propositi virum.
67. Apol., 42: Non sumus exules vitae. Meminimus gratiam nos debere Deo Domino Creatori; nullum fructum operum eius repudiamus; plane temperamus, ne ultra modum aut perperam utamur. Itaque non sine foro, non sine macello, non sine balneis, tabernis, officinis, stabulis, nundinis vestris, caeterisque commerciis cohabitamus in hoc saeculo. Navigamus et nos vobiscum et militamus et rusticamur, et mercamur, proinde miscemus artes, operas nostras publicamus usui vestro. Quomodo infructuosi videamur negotiis vestris, cum quibus et de quibus vivimus, non scio.
68. De moribus Eccleslae catholicae, lib. 1, c. 30: Merito Ecclesia catholica Mater christianorum verissima, non solum ipsum Deum, cuius adeptio Vita est beatissima, purissime atque castissime colendum praedicas; sed etiam proximi dilectionem atque charitatem ita complecteris, ut variorum morborum, quibus pro peccatis suis animae aegrotant, omnis apud te medicina praepolleat. Tu pueriliter, pueros, fortiter iuvenes, quiete senes prout cuiusque non corporis tantum, sed et animi aetas est, exerces ac doces. Tu parentibus filios libera quadam servitute subiungis, parentes filiis pia dominatione praeponis. Tu fratribus fratres religionis vinculo firmiore atque arctiore quam sanguinis nectis . . . Tu cives civibus, gentes gentibus, et prorsus homines primorum parentum recordatione, non societate tantum, sed quadam etiam fraternitate coniungis. Doces Reges prospicere populis; mones populos se subdere Regibus. Quibus honor debeatur, quibus affectus, quibus reverentia, quibus timor, quibus consolatio, quibus admonitio, quibus cohortatio, quibus disciplina, quibus obiurgatio, quibus supplicium, sedulo doces; ostendens quemadmodum et non omnibus omnia, et omnibus charitas, et nulli debeatur iniuria.
69. Cfr. I Petr., II, 25: ad Pastorem et Episcopum animarum vrotrarum.
© Copyright - Libreria Editrice Vaticana
Source: http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p- xi_enc_31121929_divini-illius-magistri_en.html: Vatican Translation.
PDF courtesy of The Catholic Society: http://www.catholicsociety.com
27
Therefore,
This for
the that unwittingly the whether in
even ideas 2 the
National tradition” philosophers of established since diocesan Church
obligation diocesan formation Schools have supplanted beginning,
genuinely significant given
education
Gravissi,nu,n
Statement Code
Ibid.
the
the
faithful
vast Church.
Church
they
claim
those
passively
many
have
in
United
pragmatism
of
Can.
Iherein
At This
The
Over
to
majority
these
oniy
Canon
Association
have
schools
recognition.
because
of
of
oversee
Catholic
of
the
of
794.
it
become
of number
of we
the
parents
directs
Catholic
of
independent
adopted
is
Educarionis They
the
their is
the
more
Independent
Bishops’
States
a
authenticity,
goodwill,
note
parents
heart
independent
them
likewise
are
Law,
not
proper
accepted
important
few
United
past
of which
children.
confident
are
an
their
of such
parents
that
and
looking
of
educational Can. so
words.
of
graduates
has
are
by
education
John
twenty Statementj,”U.S.
easy
of
to
States
lay
insinuated ends
a
Consider these
more
the
become
§ the
founders
793.
currently
education. 2
legitimate
no
have
traditionally
Catholic*
educate
them
Catholic
By
8.
for
founders
Catholic
inquiry,
to
Dewey
however,
central
longer
Catholic
mainstream
of
to Catholic
However,
These
contemporary
to
Joseph
years,
independent
Church
support
customarily
provide
from
as genuine
assert
by
reform
commonplaces
as
their
appropriate
into
have
outside
school
question modem
philosophic
and
and
Independent
schools
a
and
have Bishops.
and
Schools:
these
This
Almeida
schools
minimum
creates
discharged
leaders
Catholic
that
local
the
children
so
an
been
Catholic
the
necessary
outside
it
with
of
and
movement
long
tension
official
authentic deserves
programs, contemporary
these
schools
been
romanticism parents
cultural
In
cultural Catholic
are
the
willing
a
are
Are
are greater
Conference
and
obligations
and
certain Support
as
tenant
in
styled
the
intellectual
example
seen
independent
in
Schools.
education
in
continuing
its
it
They
the
response is
diocesan
the
in
teacher
and
Richard
a
traditional
fact
and
is
forces
Catholic
obligation
heightened
to
education 3
frequency
has
including
more as
the
faithful
faith’
of
recognized
independent
of
unfortunate
pursue
teacherc
Good
(1990). philosophic
good a
Catholic
of
cultural
the
progressivism
acquired
of
main
‘Catholic
are
thorough
training
and
Jean
jurisdiction.
to
foundations
and
Cross
their
to
seventy
education
Cat:olic
for
alike
for
the
what
boundaries
the
by
future
establish
which
tool
recently,
when the
and
Elementary
Jacques
dlike.
the
and
the
profession.
that
gradual
progressivist
the
momentum
tension
in
to
tradition,”
programs.
obligation
for
they
forces-which
that
treatment
Church,
plus
Church?
intellectual
the
consider
Catholic
operation
one
have
this
schools
teaching
for
is
of
the schools
Rousseau.
believe
we
‘Catholic
members
assimilation
of
the
and
recognizes
piece
between
these
their
been
local
have
official
especially
Seconda
denial
Educational
as
as
of
are
Therefore
than
carefully
teachers,
principles
of
is
children.
the
ideas,
for
to
a
fabric
an
the
have
Church
seen
good
a
be
the
These
of
can
option
faith. 4
the mere
of
that
the
of
but
the
a
for be
John
faith
“See, With
fundamental
educational this Catholic
can through
education, education,
been intuitively accordance
finally secondary considers obliged
“sapiential including Christ
Catholic genuine ? confuse
whether any student’s
Cardinal
through Depositurn
life” this intelligible moral
understanding the
°
J.
Fides
Cf.
Cf.
Fides
S.
social
be
Fides
SL.
very
subject
way,
e.g.,
received
and
Brubacker,
understood
Dewey
at
ci
and
and Thomas,
ci
a
contribute
The
In
least
to
Ratio,
faith
a the
education.
it
universal
Ratio.
educational
education
passim,
e! context,
Newman.
reason,
freedom
the
the
curriculum
many
environment
contrast,
justify
is
students
metaphysical
that which
many
his
dimension”,
Ratio
Fidei
order
with
Holy
studied
by-product
principles. 10
which
ordered
opposition
an
radical
and
highest
§
by
Church.
§
Surnina
of
Modern
the
81.
89.
The
implicit Catholic
,
these
as
of
the
the
of
the §
Father’s
the
are
the
reason
to
preserved
judgment
of
operating
traditional
cannot
will
Idea
in ordered
underlies
these
And
moral
I
the
end
Holy
are
Church
meaning reform.
to
expression
subjects
good
Theologiae,
Holy
and causes,
of
Philosophies
a
traditional
Accordingly,
with
of
this
of
i.e.
not
genuine
capacity
to
the
ultimately
order
sense
rightly
of it
2.
Of
educators,
independent
a
education
most
and
Father
endorse
their when
is
Father
Catholic
its
University,
study
to
end
classical
and
course,
deference
in
in
principles
for
rightly
many
In
which
principles
of
of
an
of
dimension
metaphysical
accordance
the
1-Il,
recent
most
ordered
and
or
Catholic promulgated urging
this
rightly
of things
objective
of
the
ultimate
himself
Catholic
philosophy
explicitly
as
person
adaptation
ordered
Education,
q.
of
the
have
we
judges
not
for
they
education
curricular
need
reason
liberal
(South
cherished
57
educational
Catholic
the
encyclical.
to
of
student
the
in
are
its
ordered
by
a.
so
of
individual
adopted
declared teach
school
as
the
progressivist
2
wisdom,
to
relation
of
principles.
truth
with
end.
as
necessity
Bend,
its
Catholic
to
realize
all
arts,
that
condemned
the
truth
return
Jesus
(New
in
by educational
to
the
to
practical
things,
is
matter
to
schools
or
beliefs.
the
study
this
in
to
many
come
Because
and
cultural
the
precisely
1982).
“to
further
understanding
and
ends Fides
this
the
York,
to
the
favor
that
Christ.’
the
to
a
highest
freedom.
highest
education,
teaching
the
engage
of traditional
the
Therefore,
manner
traditional
should to
of
confusion,
and
need
to
proper
parents
the
Catholic
tenets
have
utility.
1950).
a
et
pragmatism,
way
an of
wisdom
“ultimate
surroundings.
a
understand
many
proper
establishment
sets
Ratio,
insofar
progressivist
deeper
Therefore,
the
causes. 8
understanding
for
sense,
truth
pursued
ultimately
in
authority
end,
of
in
have
Thus
them
adaptation
like
modern
philosophy
which
Catholic
elementary
of
which
modern
relationship
the
principles
supports
they
in
more
as
and
become
truth
but
an
those
come
its
in a
by-products
the
these
the
educational
valid
radically
no
objective
deeper
it
a
order
highest
of
they
and
educators,
principles
about
be
are
teachings
This
properly
is
cultural
philosophy
wisdom
longer
developed
to
the
of
this
of
have
justified
an
studied
of
to
view
in
and
more
teach
understand
students
so
the
between
is
Church.
obstacle
Catholic
recover
human
view
sense. 9
speaking,
that
to and
always
feel
of
and
of
reform
ordered
which
deeply”
them
of
of
must
by
of
there
by
of
the
to
In
its
to
In in
the
tension
schools progressivist Catholic
genuine reforms
demonstrated seems
culture pragmatic a
obstacles Deweyan consistent
the Catholic
have truths they 2
‘
Sec
A.
minimum
extent
Church
Bull, Greelev,
are
(irm’issimu,n
chosen
of
truer
The
by
between
as
in
Catholic
not,
S.J..
in
Catholic
education
that
pragmatism
that
training
with
the
an
according
intellectual
for
Catholic
now proponents
they
The
Catholic
we
presuppositions;
aid
at
face
light
these
the
the
least
cannot
them
Educaiio,iis
than
are
to
education.
Function
tradition.
last
Church
preferable
highest
requires
of Schools
Catholic
independent
educating
to
some
ever
education,
faith.’ 2
and
fail
two
and
of
the be
of
independent
to and
the
to
leaders
surprised philosophical
,
generations
social
success
Second
the
that
Unfortunately,
leaders
In
grow
say
Given
to
the
administrative
Catholic
7
at
children
this
the
&
the
not
Declining
that
schools
best,
culture.’ 3
in 8
in
in
Vatican
public
sense
and
principles
the
later
for in
their
appreciation
many
breaking
Graduate
Catholic
they
structuring
since
the
in
progressivist
its
are
and
when
Church.
they
attempt
genuine
B!shops’
schools.
sapiential
precisely
such
Council’s
are
Independent
successful,
obligations
data
theological
School.’
upon
are,
away
our
implementing
schools
schools
passliti,
indicate
of
to
Statement
genuine
Catholic
on
children
which
the
implement
world-view
this
from
dimension,
dictate
the
13
recognize
it
ch.
sublime
Church
Thoulir
are
aspirations
state
Catholic
whole,
that
may
these
their
educational
7,
in
environments
who
Catholic
to
(Kansas
Support
the
of
educated
be
illuminate
studies
genuine
modernist
by
(1938),
but
cultural
of
have
affairs
good
sapiential
best
the
schools
looking
modem
ol
of
City,
as
in
enormous
been
for
to Education.
reform. the
p.3 7 8.
a
are
Catholic
creed, has
educational
repository
and
resolve
1976).
freed
the
all
have
Church.
influences.
founded
nurtured
principles
upon
culture
prevailed
intellectual
of
Church.
but
of
human
cultural
parents
the
these
anti-
it
of
be
If
on
in
of
To At 0 0.
None Dare Call It Education: ChAPTER 3 The documented account ofhow education “reformers are underminmg academics and traditional values. USING AMERICA’S SCHOOLS TO CREATE “A NEW SOCIAL ORDER”
John A. Storrner . . Thephilosophy ofthe classroom in this generation © 1999 Liberty Bell Press, Florissant, MO will be the philosophy ofpolitics, government and life in the newt. —Abraham Lincoln Excerpt Printed by Permission of the Author UNDERSTANDING what is happening today in America’s schools would be impossible without a knowledge of what radical educators proposed over Copies of this book may be purchased by sending $8.95 to sixty years ago. Without a comprehensive overview of Liberty Bell Press, P0 Box 32, Florissant, MO 63032 how they planned to change the nation’s way oflife and culture, few will believe that the “horrible examples” described and documented in this book could actually be happening. The goal, which the radical educators spelled out in their writings and speeches, was using the schools to create “a new social order.” By 1934, they had enough clout and influence to control most teacher training institutions, the rewriting of many textbooks and the largest organization of teachers, the National Educa tion Association. Implementation of their plans in the 60 years since has dramatically changed America’s culture and ways of living and the lives of several generations of young Americans, many of whom are not now so young. Known as “progressivists,” or “Frontier Thinkers,” the reformers were disciples ofJohn Dewey, head ofthe prestigious Teachers College at Columbia University in New York. He was the nation’s most influential educator in the first half of the 20th Century. By the 1950s fully 20% ofall American school superintendents and 40% of all teacher college heads had received 4 NOIJE DA1?E çALLIT EDUCATION Using Schools To Create A New Social Orr”r 41
advanced degrees iiridèf ‘Dewey at Columbia. As an transformed and expanded. This could be ac atheist and socialist, Dewey co-authored the revolu complished, he said, in three ways: tionary, anti-God, Humanist Manifesto I in 1934. First andforemost, the development of a new philosophy of In the forefront ofDewey’s “Frontier Thinkers,” as the life and education which will be fully appropriate to the new group called themselves, were Dr. George Counts, social order; second, the building of an adequate plan for the professor of education at Columbia, and Dr. Harold production of a new race of educational workers; third, the Rugg. Dewey’s theories had been concerned chiefly making of new activities and materials for the curriculum.3 with teaching methods. Counts and Rugg, known as’ He cooperated’ with George Counts on the first and “hard progressivists” added the concept of using the second phases of the program while he played a major schools as an instrument for “building a new social role in the rewriting of textbooks Wand curriculum order.” materials to produce the “new philosophy of life and Harold Rugg concentrated on training teachers and education.” writing teaching materials and books. In his’ book, The A CONTROLLED ECONOMY Great Technology, written for teachers in 1933, Rugg made clear that the changes he envisioned said: Dr. Counts would result in: A new public mind isto be created. How? Only by creating tens of millions of new individual minds and welding them a coordinated, planned and socialized economy.8 into a new social mind. Old stereotypes must be broken up and Accomplishing such a drastic remaking of America new “climates of opinion” formed in the neighborhoods of would involve many changes, Counts admitted. He America.1 said: Later in his book, Rugg defined how the schools were Changes in our economic system will, of course, require to be used to transform American political and changes in our ideals.9 economic institutions and create the new “public niind” Counts saw no wrong in abandoning even the tradi which would accept complete government control ofthe tional concepts of morality to achieve his goals. He individual: pointed out in his book, The Soviet Challenge ,To .through the schools of the world we shall disseminate a new America that even in Russia... conce tion of government—one that will embrace all of the co ective activities of men; one that will postulate the need ...new principles’of right and’wrong are being forged.’° for scientific control and operation of economic activities in TEACHERS CHALLENGED TO SEIZE POWER the interest of all people.2 To achieve the “new social order,” Counts, in 1932, Note that Rugg did not say “a new type of govern called for teachers ofthe nation to provide the impetus. ment” but a “new conception of government.” Rugg was In his monograph, Dare the School Build a New Social troposing that while the outward forms of government Order? Counts wrote: would stay the same its functions and powers would be That the teachers should deliberately reach for power and then 0 make the most of their conquest is my firm convi’’n. To the Using Schools To Create A1ew Social Or4r 43 C) NONE DARE CALL IT EDUCATION destroyed, and all of us, including the owners, must be sub extent that they are permitted to fashion the curriculum and jected to a large degree of social control.’5 procedures of the school they will definitely and positively influence the social attitudes, ieals and behavior of the com A year after delivering this call for destruction of free ing generation.13. enterprise and individual freedom (laissez-faire), secretary of the NEA, a Counts published his Dare the School Build a New Givens was named executive until his retirement in Social Order? in 1932. Some would say, “That’s an position he held for 17 years 11, the NEA has interesting bit of ancient history. We’re living over 65 . 1952. As will be detailed in Chapter powerful lobbying years later.” That’s true, of course, but Counts’ become possibly the nation’s most for more money for monograph is still used in training teachers and ad organization. It doesn’t just lobby NEA conventions annual ministrators today. For exainpie, the widely used education. In the past decade philosophy of education text, Philosophical Founda ly pass a host of non-education, culture-transforming homosexuality, radi tions Of Education, by Howard Ozrnan and Samuel resolutions supporting abortion, world govern Craver reprints key parts.of Counts’ monograph includ- cal feminism, nuclear disarmament, in.g the call for teachers to reach for power quoted ment, etc.16 schools to create “a above.14 In the process of using America’s new social order,” John Dewey’s progressivist “Frontier GET CONTROL OF TIlE NEA TEACHERS UNION Thinkers” also significantly dumbed down the basic Thinkers” In “reaching for power” the “Frontier education given to America’s young people—the fruits advocated. moved in two directions as Rugg and Counts of which were seen in Chapter 1. By the late 1950s, call for teachers They rewrote the textbooks and in his many voices of alarm were beingheard. One ofthe most to grab for power, Counts said: influential was Admiral Hyman Rickover, the father of Through powerful organizations they might at last reach the the nuclear submarine and our modern nuclear Navy. public conscience and come to exercise a larger measure of. In the late 1950s, just 25 years after the Dewey’s the schools than hitherto. control over “Frontier Thinker” disciples moved to take control of Counts and his fellow “Frontier Thinkers” in their 1 America’s schools, Rickover spoke out, saying: grab for power gained the prestige ofthe largest profes America is reaping the consequences of the destruction of sional teachers organization. They captured the top traditional education by the Dewey-Kilpatrick experimen elimination of jobs and control of the National Education Association. .1 talist philosophy. eashveidl3 led to the around that the would not At the 72nd annual meeting ofthe NEA in Washington, many academic subects on i3sefulini e...The student thus receives neither intellectual D.C. in July 1934, Dr. Willard Givens, then a California training nor the factual knowledge which will help him under in a report entitled, Education school superintendent, stand the world he lives in, or to make well-reasoned decisions for a New America, said: in his private life or as a responsible citizen.’7 We are convinced that we stand today at the verge of a great culture. ..But to achieve these things many drastic changes must be made. A dying laissez-faire must be completely 44 2VONE DARE CALL IT EDUCATION Using Schools To Create A New Social Order 45
WHAT DID JOHN DEWEY REALLY BELIEVE? pragmatic, evolutionist, relativisoncets as his Who was this man, Dewey, who is so roundly criticized by the renowned Hyman Rickover, the environment is constantly changing, man also changes “father” of the nuclear submarine? Dewey was iden constantly. Therefore, Dewey concluded, teaching or tified briefly in the introduction to this chapter. The children any ofthe absolutes ofmorals, government, detrimental impact he had on American education war ethics was a waste of time. rants a further examination of the man and his He saw the destruction of a child’s individualistic was philosophies. traits as the primary goal of education. Once this or to John Dewey was an educational philosopher. His accomplished the youngster would conform adjust Ability to experimental philosophies of education were first tried whatever society in which he found himself. r in a model school at the University of Chicago before “get along with the group” became the prime measuring sum 1900. They were dismal failures. Children learned stick of a child’s educational “progress.”20 Dewey nothing. Undismayed, Dewey left Chicago in 1904 and marized his theories, saying: went to Teachers College, Columbia University, where Education, therefore, is a process for living and not a prepara with the support of major “charitable foundations,” he tion for future living.2’ became the dominant figure and the most influential THE END OF TRADITIONAL EDUCATION man in American education. Dewey laid the foundation for the future “destruction the pretext of improving “}l : \ Dewey’s disciples, under ‘of traditional education” decried by Admiral Rickover was taught to \ teaching methods, changed what when he said: merican children. We violate the child’s nature and render difficult the best A CONFIRMED ATHEIST AND SOCIALIST ethical results by introducing the child too abruptly to a reading, writing, geography, etc. What did Dewey believe? As an atheist and a socialist, number of special studies, of to his social life. ..the true center of correlation Dewey co-authored the revolutionary Humanist out of relation of the school subjects is not Manifesto I in 1934. Key points included: own social activities.22 Religious humanists regard the universe as self-existing and TEXTBOOKS not created... .Humanism believes that man is a part of nature INTO THE and that he has emerged as a result of a continuous [evolution The introduction ofa 1960s first grade “social studies” aryl process... .We are convinced that the time has passed for curriculum guide prepared by the Contra Costa Coun theism, deism, modernism, and the several varieties of “new ty, California schools shows how Dewey’s theories were uniquely religious thought”....It follows that there will be no implemented. It told teachers: and attitudes of the kind hitherto associated with emotions and civics taught separately belief in the supernatural.’8 No longer can history, geography as in the recent past, be considered adequate preparation for Implementing the anti-God principles of humanism effective citizenship.23 in his writing and teaching, Dewey re’ected fixed mora Some would ask, “Why not?” aws and eternal truths an . . . Headopt’4 ;‘ 0 NNE DARE CELL IT ED UCA?’IO 0 Using Schools To Create A New Social Ocler 47 Dewey was a socialist.28 At the climax of his career LEVELING DOWN TO TFIE GROUP’S L1L in 1950, he became honorary national chairman of the the The group is the nucleus of the progressive system. League for Industrial Democracy, American The long-established Washington newsletter, Human counterpart of the socialist British Fabian Society.29 Fabians believed socialism could be achieved a Events, revealed that to elevate and promote the by process of gradualism rather than Karl Marx’s call for “group,” Dewey had to destroy individtialism and the violent revolution. thinking which encourages it. The publication quoted a Dewey as saying: CUTTING A CULTURE’S TIES TO THE PAST Children who know how to think for themselves spoil the Dewey and his disciples wanted to create “a new harmony of the collective society which is coming, where social order.” The first step in doing so wwr1ig everyone is interdependent.25 textbooks to prevent an upcoming generation from No child is permitted to forge ahead of another. This leãiif the traditions, values, heroes and glorious would hurt the group. Automatic “social pronwtions” ‘I accomplishments of their nation. The next chapter become the norm. Nobody left ii shows how it has been done. is behind because ofpoor Ii work. This would disrupt the group. Grading and Ill It was in the area of new materials, textbooks, and graded report cards showing actual percentages earned teaching aids, that Dewey disciple Harold Rugg are frowned upon. Grading promotes competition. achieved greatest influence. He concentrated on the job Competition breeds rivalry and encourages students to of indoctrinating teachers and preparing teaching excel and rise above the group. The soaiattitiTdes, In the 1990s, Dewey’s emphasis on the group has ideals, and behavior of coming generations. resulted in schools adopting the practice of“cooperative wrote learning.” them. They were called “social studies.” All traditional Rosalie Gordon wrote What’s Happened to Our presentations of subject matter was scrapped, and a Schools? It was widely circulated in the early 1960s variety of economic, political, historical, sociological, and said of Dewey’s progressive education: and geographical data was lumped into one textbook. With such a conglomeration ofmaterial in one book, the The progressive system has reached all the way down to the lowest grades to prepare the children of America for their role deletion or slanted presentation of key events, basic as the collectivists of the future..Jh grpip—noLtj,n truths, facts and theories was not so evident. dividual child—is the uintessenceof ro ressiism. The MILLIONS DEPRIVED OF THEIR HERITAGE c i mus a ways be made to feel part of the group. He must indulge in group thinking, in group activity:6 Five million school children “learned” American political and economic history and structure in the She explains Dewey’s obsession with the group and 1930s from 14 social studies textbooks Rugg group activity by saying: 4 authored.30 He also produced the corresponding You can’t make socialists out of individualists.27 48 NONE DARE CALL IT EDUCATION Using Schools To Create A New Social Orrier 49
teachers’ guides, course outlines, and student War. Prepared for his superior in Beijing, it fell into workbooks. American hands. It said: So blatant was the downgrading of American heroes The American soldier has weak loyalty to his family, his and the U.S. Constitution, so pronounced was the anti- community, his country, his religion, and to his fellow soldier. religious bias, so open was the propaganda for socialis His concepts of right and wrong are hazy and ill-formed. tic control of men’s lives in Rugg’s textbooks that the Opportunism is easy for him. By himself he feels frightened public rebelled.3’ and insecure. He underestimates his own worth, his own strength, and his ability to survive. Rugg’s textbooks went too far, too fast for complete public acceptance. Thus, in 1940, the National Educa There is little understanding of American political history and tion Association began promoting a set of “social philosophy, the federal, state, and community organizations, studies” texts known as the Building Americci series.33 state and civil rights, freedom safeguards, checks and balances and how these things allegedly operate within his own system. They were replacements for the discredited Rugg series. They were widely adopted but a few years later He fails to appreciate the meaning of and the necessity for the Senate Investigating Committee on Education of military or any other form of organization.36 the California legislature condemned the NEA-spon It would be easy and reassuring to pass this capsule sored series for subtly playin4g up Marxism and destroy indictment off as Communist propaganda. However, ing American traditions.3 The Senate committee without use of physical torture, drugs, intensive report... psychological treatment, coercion, or any of the other ...found among other things that 113 Communist-front or tactics usually associated with brainwashing, the ganizations had to do with some of the material in the books Chinese Communists made collaborators of one-third and that 50 Communist-front authors were connected with it. of all American POW’s who fell into their hands during Among the authors are Beatrice and Sidney Webb, identified the Korean War.37 with the Fabian Socialist movement in Great Britain.35 This shocking record so astonishe4 and concerned Rugg’s efforts and the efforts of others who followed military authorities that a full-scale inquiry was con his lead had an effect. A dozen years later young ducted. The report of the Presidential Commission Americans went to Korea to fight. They had grown up which made the study said pointedly: on the books produced by Rugg and others with similar The uninformed POW’s were up against it. They couldn’t goals. Thousands of them became POW’s. Unlike wars answer arguments in favor of communism with arguments in before or since, nearly one-third collaborated with the favor of Americanism because they knew so little about communist enemy. In their early months of captivity America. nearly four out of every ten died from a new disease Fifteen years after Korea many from another genera Army psychiatrists called, “Give-Up-Itis.” tion of poorly schooled young Americans, including a A very unflattering professional evaluation of the future President ofthe United States, ran offto Canada typical American was written by the Chief of the or used other methods for avoiding service in the U.S. cdinese Peoples Volunteer Army during the Koreap.. iTh 50 NdNE L IT EDUCATION C C
Armed Force. They refused td fight communism in Viet Nam. A NEW GENERATION WORKS IN EVERY AREA Dewey, Counts, Rugg and most of the other “progres sivist” culture-changers are long gone. But now, 65 years later, students shaped and influenced by the “new education” of Dewey and his “progressivists” con trol most of the basic culture-shaping institutions in our society. The press, the radio and TV and the enter tainment industry and the government and its bureaucracy with trillion dollar budgets no longer promote and uphold traditional American values. Even many mainline churches, which should be defending traditional Bible-based values, have broken their ties to an authoritative Bible and support abortion, radical feminism, ordination of homosexuals, world govern ment, etc. Dewey is history, but a new generation of “reformers” is carrying on the war for a new society—a new way of life. (Their identity, words, and work will be discussed in Chapters 6-9.) These so-called “reformers” are using Goals 2000, School-to-Work and Outcome-Based Education to create a new way of living—a new culture for the upcoming generation. They are building on the “new foundations” Dewey and his followers laid as they used schools and textbooks to destroy the solid founda tions on which America grew great. The next chapter documents how Dewey and his followers used the schools and textbooks in the transforming ofAmerica— in the creation of”a new social order.”
.,
/
4
and sibility
gether
novels), Tudor
(Murder
Miss
sider
the the
out whatever
years.
of amid
tionary, the
turn
cated
amount
education, reforms
boards, contribution tion.
nothing—perhaps amateur
all,
thing.
are
icisms to
ly
papers ology:
favorable.
a
behavior
biologists,
DOROTHY
When
Before
However,
matter,
its
draw.
technical
to
wrote
at
young back,
parents.
commendable.
T
back
Savers,
one
the
For
true
people,
times,
to
worry
some
There
are
comfortable
for
the
to
also
limited,
to nor
HAT
I
we
romantic,
may
Must
you
©bv
complex
to tag
or
Up
the
the
perhaps,
surely,
if
object,
the propose
would
about say
made
this:
men
the
Bishops
most
it think
The
to
two
the
which time
translated
nor
ministries;
we
and
best
us.
I,
to
comes
dismiss
point is
luminous feel
National
wheel
L. fitted
is
Advertise,
that
the conduct
WHOSE
that
a
also
went
boards
are
should miscellaneous
with
metaphysics;
the
countenance
in
thereafter
that towards or
irrelevant
known
SAYERS
pressures in
about entitled
certain
mediaevalist,
discussion Too
the will
of
at
Epstein
about
the
another,
first
air of
to
if
not
training
me
particular
one
a
up
calls all
which
Learning
Dante
we
present
experience
Introductory
progress
Review, ever and
of
preserve much
of
highest
reasonable
the
for
with
presume
their all
Gaudy to
point,
the
our
to
to
excellent
are JZost]öolsof
governors,
their
of
were
that
for
and
people
plain,
remarkably
hand—I
professional
be
her
have
education been
the may
colleges,
end
them
and
inorganic
the
minds,
our
questions
to specialization
climate
opinions
no
degree
if
laudaror
carried and
some
Picasso
Inc.,
held
Night.
artificial
own
Lord
their
produce
university
appropriate
of
have
the
taught.
an
modern
to
of
we
apology.
blunt
for
modesty,
are
reason
Papers
the
provided
will
and
150
opinion
teaching
fit
nor
Chanson
discuss
four
affairs,
nor
of a
Peter
learnt
intellectual improbable
chemists,
a
began
appointed
and
into
that
early
do
Middle
to
moment.
about
teachers,
men
potential
lemporis
opinion
Even
a
East
ask
occasionally
the
society,
prolongation
the
why
or
on
assume
in. not
society
It
is
a
hang these
effect.
Wimser
phrase—reac
age
about
are nothing—our
that
to
education five
you ministries
write
dozen
examination
is
Dante.
is
35th
not
if
de
let
Ages.
the
economics:
know
about
lose
a
we
extremely
at
is
we
about For
activities
we
we
value.
to
hundred
freedom the
Roland.
that
acri.
to
respon
us
a
of
Neither
kind
educa
wholly
to
Street, veriest
which
learnt
series
other
must
good
high
alto
sight
have
con
edu
the’
say.
how
crit
pop
the
the
the
of
or
at
of
of
is
New
about?
or
using
faintly
which
the you
elsewhere question, ordinary
extremely
public up
his And
II of on presumably you
ganda susceptible
of
from propaganda
that always
ined? is when and
might argument
Ages. prolonging
now
which, intellectual
beneficial brings postpone
physical
Have
Has
higher
because
York,
modern
persons
at
the
terms
terms, ever
AVE
sometimes
girl
the
so when
the
the
the
Do
This
be
he committee
affairs it
much
And
troubled
mean
while
with
you
other
much
maturity
press
NY YOU
felt
ever
inability
plausible? are
than
at
or
and
proportion
in
terms
either
has they
the
you
high
it
educational
the
another
you
is
capable
to
childhood
responsible
ever
to
disentangling
if
to
favor
a
may
that
10016.
easier
certainly
it
ever, they
are
struck
side?
partly
noticed
it
already
and
more acceptance
so.
certain
put period
use?
an
the
have
incidence
meet
think
a in
to by
has followed
meetings,
they
lead
which
settled
of
may
of are
in
extent
number
the
this
precisely
to
the
will
Or
of
Or
you the
influence
to
Reprinted
true,
of
ever
an
and
the listening
postponing
of
sinking
of
how
actually
taught to
you
methods
and defined
distribute
radio
interest
acting
learn
people,
individual how
literacy
have
down
is
amount
uneasy
as
assume
education
by
dangerous
this,
fact
of
average a
been,
refute hitherto
but
of
so
troubled
and
frequently
odd,
discussion
adolescence
of
debates
the
often,
irrelevant
and
than
you
more of
responsibility
from
to
not
marked
to
of as
and
know
them?
the
psychological
throughout with
is
been
people
sispicion
upon
the
the
or
the
in
a over
opposite
of
the
chairmen
so
advertisement
less
debater
ever
wholly.
or
unheard-of
there
debate
generally
psychiatrist,
think
if
unfortunate,
opinion
subjects—but
misunderstanding?
his
heart?
because
slipshod
arguments
school-leaving
more?
and
permission. on
fretted
to
mere
Have
one
writers
the
in
a
in good
should
matter
pondered
reply
into
was
wide
have
society.
the
our
that
committees,
among
that
sense The
very
to
man
Western
mechanical
to
and
of
you
thaa
is
it
newspapers
by
in
fail
syntax
complications
own
the speak
and
that made
have
area?
most
which
modern
that
committees?
the
a
is
are great
of
does
the
that
the
to
the
a-nd
ever
The
adult
does
he
upon
to
late
inelegant
years
speakers
day?
unimag
age
product
scarcely
become he
there
that
Europe
Middle
proven
of
propa
to
Or
or
today,
extra
define
define
going
rarity
crops
stock
mass
have
been
date
that
and
and
fact
boy was
our
she
the the
To
do
or
of
in is Do you ever find that young people, when they have left Another quotation from the same issue of the TLS comes school, not only forget most of what they have learnt (that in fittingly here to wind up this random collection of dis is only to be expected) but forget also, or betray that they quieting thoughts—this time from a review of Sir Richard have never really known, how to tackle a new subject for Livingstone’s Some Tasks for Education: themselves? Are you often bothered by coming across grown-up men and women who seem unable to distinguish More than once the reader is reminded of the value of an 0 study one subject, so as to learn “the between a book that is sound, scholarly, and properly doc intensive of at least meaning of knowledge” and what precision and persistence umented, and one that is, to any trained eye, Vei’yconspicu is needed to attain it. Yet there is elsewhere full recognition ously none of these things? Or who cannot handle a library of the distressing fact that a man may be master in one field book of reference, catalogue? Or who, when faced with a and show no better judgment than his neighbor anywhere betray a curious inability to extract from it the passages else; he remembers what he has learnt, but forgets altogether relevant to the particular question which interests them? how he learned it. Do you often come across people for whom, all their lives, a “subject” remains a “subject,” divided by watertight I would draw your attention particularly to that last bulkheads from all other “subjects,” so that they experience sentence, which offers an explanation of what the writer very great difficulty in making an immediate mental con rightly calls the “distressing fact” that the intellectual skills nection between, let us say, algebra and detective fiction, bestowed upon us by our education are not readily transfer sewage disposal and the price of salmon—or, more gener able to subjects other than those in which we acquired ally, between such spheres of knowledge as philosophy and them: “he remembers what he has learnt, but forgets alto economics, or chemistry and art? gether how he learned it.” Are you occasionally perturbed by the things written by Is not the great defect of our education today—a defect adult men and women for adult men and women to read? traceable through all the disquieting symptoms of trouble We find a well-known biologist writing in a weekly paper that I have mentioned—that although we often succeed in to the effect that: “It is an argument against the existence teaching our pupils “subjects.” we fail lamentably on the of a Creator” (I think he put it more strongly; but since I whole in teaching them how to think: they learn everything, have, most unfortunately, mislaid the reference. I will put except the art of learning. It is as though we had taught a his claim at its lowest)—”an argument against the existence child, mechanically and by rule of thumb, to play “The of a Creator that the same kind of variations which are Harmonious Blacksmith” upon the piano, but had never produced by natural selection can be produced at will by taught him the scale or how to read music; so that, having stock-breeders.” One might feel tempted to say that it is memorized “The Harmonious Blacksmith,” he still had not rather an argument for the existence of a Creator. Actually, the faintest notion how to proceed from that tp tackle of course, it is neither: all it proves is that the same mate “The Last Rose of Summer.” Why do I say, “as. though”? rial causes (recombination of the chromosomes by cross In certain of the arts and crafts we sometimes do precisely and to account for all this—requiring a child to “express himself” in paint before 0 breeding so forth) are sufficient observed variations—just as the various combinations of the we teach him how to handle the colors and the brush. same dozen tones are materially sufficient to account for There is a school of thought which believes this to be the Beethoven’s Moonlight Sonata and the noise the cat makes right way to set about the job. Bus observe: it is not the by walking on the keys. But the cat’s performance neither way in which a trained craftsman will go about to teach proves nor disproves the existence of Beethoven; and all himself a new medium. He, having learned by experience that is proved by the biologist’s argument is that he was the best way to economize labor and take the thing by the unable to distinguish between a material and a final cause. Here is a sentence from no less academic a source than a front-page article in the Times Literary Supplement:
The Frenchman, Alfred Epinas, pointed out that certain species (e.g., ants and wasps) can only face the horrors of life and death in association.
I do not know what the Frenchman actually did say: what the Englishman says he said is patently meaningless. We cannot know whether life holds any horror for the ant, nor in what sense the isolated wasp which you kill upon the window-pane can be said to “face” or not to “face” the horrors of death. The subject of the article is mass behavior in man; and the human motives have been unobtrusively transferred from the main proposition to the supporting instance. Thus the argunent. in effect, assumes what it set out to prove—a fact which would become immediately ap parent if it were presented in a formal syllogism. This is only a small and haphazard example of a vice which per vades whole books—particularly books written by men of science on metaphysical subjects. 0 JANUARY 19. 1979 91 right end, will start off by doodling about on an odd piece mar” belongs especially to the “subject” of foreign lan of material, in order to “give himself the feel of the tool.” guages. and essay-writing to the “subject” called “English”; Let us now look at the mediaeval scheme of education— while Dialectic has become almost entirely divorced from the syllabus of the Schools. It does not matter, for the the rest of the curriculum, and is frequently practiced un ( moment, whether it was devised for small children or for systematically and out of school hours as a separate exer older students, or how long people were supposed to take cise, only very loosely related to the main business of learn over it. What matters is the light it throws upon what the ing. Taken by and large, the great difference of emphasis men of the Middle Ages supposed to be the object and the between the two conceptions holds good: modern education right order of the educative process. concentrates on teaching subjects, leaving the method of The syllabus was divided into two parts: the Trivium thinking, arguing, and expressing one’s conclusions to be and Quadrivium. The second part—the Quadrivium—con picked up by the scholar as he goes along; mediaeval edu sisted of “subjects.” and need not for the moment concern cation concentrated on first forging and learning to handle us. The interesting thing for us is the composition of th’ the tools of learning, using whatever subject came handy Trivium, which preceded the Quadrivium and was the pre as a piece of material on which to doodle until the use of liminary discipline for it. It consisted of three parts: Gram the tool became second nature. mar, Dialectic, and Rhetoric, in that order. “Subjects” of some kind there must be, of course. One cannot learn the theory of grammar without learning an actual language, or learn to argue and orate without speak the first thing we notice is that two at any rate ing about something in particular. The debating subjects of these “subjects” are not what we should call “subjects” of the Middle Ages were drawn largely from theology, or at all: they are only methods of dealing with subjects. from the ethics and history of antiquity. Often, indeed, Grammar, indeed, is a “subject” in the sense that it does they became stereotyped, especially towards the end of the mean definitely learning a language—at that period it meant learning Latin. But language itself is simply the me dium in which thought is expressed. The whole of the Tri We who were scandalized when men were sent vium was, in fact, intended to teach the pupil the proper to fight armored tanks with rifles, are use of the tools of learning, before he began to apply them riot scandalized when young men and women to “subjects” at all. First, he learned a language: not just are sent into the world to fight massed how to order a meal in a foreign language, but the struc propaganda with a smattering of ‘subjects’ ture of a language, and hence of language itself—what it was, how it was put together. and how it worked. Second ly, he learned how to use language: how to define his terms ( and make accurate statements: how to construct an argu period, and the far-fetched and wire-drawn absurdities of ment and how to detect fallacies in argument. Dialectic. Scholastic argument fretted Milton and provide food for that is to say, embraced Logic and Disputation. Thirdly, he merriment even to this day. Whether they were in them learned to express himself in language—how to say what he selves any more hackneyed and trivial than the usual sub had to say elegantly and persuasively. jects set nowadays for “essay-writing” I should not like At the end of his course, he was required to compose a to say: we may ourselves grow a little weary of “A Day in thesis upon some theme set by his masters or chosen by My Holidays” and all the rest of it. But most of the mer himself, and afterwards to defend his thesis against the riment is misplaced, because the aim and object of the de criticism of the faculty. By this time he would have learned bating thesis has by now been lost sight of. —or woe betide him—not merely to write an essay on pa A glib speaker in the Brains Trust once entertained his per, but to speak audibly and intelligibly from a platform. audience (and reduced the late Charles Williams to helpless and to use his wits quickly when heckled. There would rage) by asserting that in the Middle Ages it was a matter also be questions, cogent and shrewd, from those who had of faith to know how many archangels could dance on the already run the gauntlet of debate. point of a needle. I need not say, I hope, that it never was It is, of course, quite true that bits and pieces of the a “matter of faith”: it was simply a debating exercise, whose mediaeval tradition still linger, or have been revived. in set subject was the nature of angelic substance: were angels the ordinary school syllabus of today. Some knowledge of material, and if so. did they occupy space? The answer grammar is still required when learning a foreign language— usually adjudged correct is, I believe, that angels are pure perhaps I should say, “is again required”: for during my intelligences; not material, but limited, so that they may own lifetime we passed through a phase when the teaching have location in space but not extension. An analogy might of declensions and conjugations was considered rather rep be drawn from human thought. which is similarly non-ma rehensible, and it was considered better to pick these things terial and similarly limited. Thus, if your thought is con up as we went along. School debating societies flourish: centrated upon one thing—say, the point of a needle—it essays are written: the necessity for “self-expression” is is located there in the sense that it is not elsewhere; but stressed, and perhaps even over-stressed. But these activities although it is “there,” it occupies no space there, and there are cultivated more or less in detachment, as belonging to is nothing to prevent an infinite number of different people’s the special subjects in which they are pigeon-holed rather thoughts being concentrated upon the same needle-point mental training to at the same time. The proper subject of the argument is ( than as forming one coherent scheme of which all “subjects” stand in a subordinate relation. “Gram- thus seen to be the distinction between location and cx-
92 NATIONAL REVIEW tension in space; the matter on which the argument is mentally equip for the intellectual conflict along lines exercised happens to be the nature of angels (although, as chosen by ourselves. We will endow them with excepn we have seen, it might equally well have been something ally docile parents; we will staff our school with teachers else); the practical lesson to be drawn from the argument who are themselves perfectly familiar with the aims and is not to use words like “there” in a loose and unscientific methods of the Trivium; we will have our buildings and way, without specifying whether you mean “located there” staff large enough to allow our classes to be small enough or “occupying space there.” for adequate handling; and we will postulate a Board of Scorn in plenty has been poured out upon the mediaeval Examiners willing and qualified to test the products we passion for hair-splitting: but when we look at the shame turn out. Thus prepared, we will attempt to sketch out a less abuse made, in print and on the platform, of contro syllabus—a modern Trivium “with modifications”; and we versial expressions with shifting and ambiguous conno will see where we get to. tations, we may feel it in our hearts to wish that every But first: what age shall the children be? Well, if one reader and hearer had been so defensively armored by his is to educate them on novel lines, it will be better that education as to be able to cry: Distinguo. they should have nothing to unlearn; besides, one cannot For we let our young men and women go out unarmed, begin a good thing too early, and the Trivium is by its in a day when armor was never so necessary. By teaching nature not learning, but a preparation for learning. We them all to read, we have left them at the mercy of the will, therefore, “catch ‘em young,” requiring of our pupils printed word. By the invention of the film and the radio, only that they shall be able to read, write, and cipher. we have made certain that no aversion to reading shall My views about child-psychology are, I admit, neither secure them from the incessant battery of words, words, orthodox nor enlightened. Looking back upon myself (since •words. They do not know what the words mean; they do I am the child I know best and the only child I can pre not know how to ward them off or blunt their edge or tend to know from inside) I recognize three states of devel. fling them back; they are a prey to words in their emotions opment.. These, in a rough-and-ready fashion, I will call instead of being the masters of them in their intellects. We the Poll-Parrot, the Pert, and the Poetic-—the latter coin who were scandalized in 1940 when men were sent to fight ciding, approximately, with the onset of puberty. The Poll- armored tanks with rifles, are not scandalized when young Parrot stage is the one in which learning by heart is easy men and women are sent into the world to fight massed and, on the whole, pleasurable; whereas reasoning is dif propaganda with a smattering of “subjects”; and when ficult and, on the whole, little relished. At this age, one whole classes and whole nations become hypnotized by the readily memorizes the shapes and appearances of things; arts of the spellbinder, we have the impudence to be aston one likes to recite the number-plates of cars; one rejoices ished. We dole out lip-service to the importance of edu in the chanting of rhymes and the rumble and thunder of cation—lip-service and, just occasionally, a little grant unintelligible polysyllables; one - enjoys the mere accumu of money; we postpone the school-leaving age, and plan to lation of things. The Pert age, .‘hich follows upon this build bigger and better schools; the teachers slave consci (and, naturally, overlaps it to some extent), is 0 character entiously in and out of school hours; and yet, as I believe, ized by contradicting, answering back, liking to “catch all this devoted effort is largely frustrated, because we have people out” (especially one’s elders); and by the pro lost the tools of learning, and in their absence can only pounding of conundrums. Its nuisance-value is extremely make a botched and piecemeal job of it. high. It usually sets in about the Fourth Form. The Poetic What, then, are we to do? We cannot go back to the age is popularly known as the “difficult” age. It is self- Middle Ages. That is a cry to which we have become ac centered; it yearns to express itself; it rather specializes in customed. We cannot go back—or can we? Distinguo. I being misunderstood; it is restless and tries to achieve in- should like every term in that proposition defined. Does “go back” mean a retrogression in time, or the revision of an error? The first is clearly impossible per se; the second is a thing which wise men do every day. “Cannot”—does this mean that our behavior is determined irreversibly, or merely that such an action would be very difficult in view of the opposition it would provoke? Obviously the twentieth century is not and cannot be the fourteenth; but if “the Middle Ages” is, in this context, simply a pictur esque phrase denoting a particular educational theory, there seems to be no a priori reason why we should not “go back” to it—with modification.s—as we have already “gone back,” with modifications, to, let us say, the idea of playing Shakespeare’s plays as he wrote them, and not in th,- “n1” ,‘,f C),k ,nd fl,rri,4’ once seemed to be the latest thing in theatrical progress. Let us amuse ourselves by imagining that such progres sive retrogression is possible. Let us make a clean sweep of all educational authorities, and furnish ourselves with a nice little school of boys and girls whom we may experi— 0
JANUARY 19, 1979 93 dependence; and, with good luck and go’x guidance, it should show the beginnings of creativenes” reaching-out towards a synthesis of what it already knows, and a delib erate eagerness to know and do some one thing in pref me that the layout ( :rence to all others. Now it seems to of the Trivium adapts itself with a singular appropriate ness to these three ages: Grammar to the Poll-Parrot, Dialectic to the Pert, and Rhetoric to the Poetic age. Let us begin, then, with Grammar. This, in practice, means the grammar of some language in particular; and it must be an inflected language. The grammatical struc ture of an uninflected language is far too analytical to be tackled by any one without previous practice in Dialectic. Moreover, the inflected languages interpret the uninflected. whereas the uninflected are of little use in interpreting the inflected. I will say at once, quite firmly, that the best grounding for education is the Latin grammar. I say this. not because Latin is traditional and mediaeval, but simply because even a rudimentary knowledge of Latin cuts down the labor and pains of learning almost any other subject was a fault of mediaeval education which we need, not per by at least 50 per cent. It is the key to the vocabulary and petuate. The stories can be enjoyed and remembered in structure of all the Romance languages and to the structure English. and related to their origin at a subsequent stage. of all the Teutonic languages, as well as to the technical Recitation aloud should be practiced, individually os in vocabulary of all the sciences and to the literature of the chorus; for we must not forget that we are laying the entire Mediterranean civilization, together with all its his groundwork for Disputation and Rhetoric. torical documents. The grammar of History should consist, I think, of dates, Those whose pedantic preference for a living language events, anecdotes, and personalities. A set of dates to which persuades them to deprive their pupils of all these advan one can peg all later historical knowledge is of enormous tages might substitute Russian, whose grammar is still help later on in establishing the perspective of history. more primitive. Russian is, of course, helpful with the It does not greatly matter which dates: those of the Kings other Slav dialects. There is something also to be said for of England will do very nicely, provided that they are ac costumes, architecture, -and other f’ Classical Greek. But my own choice is Latin. Having thus companied by pictures of pleased the Classicists among you, I will proceed to horrify •everyday things, so that the mere mention of a date calls them by adding that I do not think it either wise or neces up a strong visual presentment of the whole period. sary to cramp the ordinary pupil upon the Procrustean bed Geography will similarly be presented in its factual as of the Augustan Age, with its highly elaborate and artificial pect, with maps, natural features, and visual presentment verse forms and oratory. Post-classical and rnediaeval Latin, of customs, costumes, flora, fauna, and so on; and I believe which was a living language down to the end of the Ren myself that the discredited and old-fashioned memorizing aissance, is easier and in some ways livelier; and a study of of a few capital cities, rivers, mountain ranges, etc., does it helps to dispel the widespread notion that learning and no harm. Stamp-collecting may be encouraged. literature came to a full-stop when Christ was born and Science, in the Poll-Parrot period, arranges itself natu only woke up again at the Dissolution of the Monasteries. rally and easily round collections—the identifying and Latin should be begun as early as possible—at a time naming of specimens and, in general, the kind of thing that when inflected speech seems no more astonishing than any used to be called “natural history,” or, still more charming other phenomenon in an astonishing world; and when the ly, “natural philosophy.” To know the names and properties chanting of “Amo, Amos, Amar” is as ritually agreeable to of things is, at this age, a satisfaction in itself; to recognize the feelings as the chanting of “eeny, meeny, miney, mo.” a devil’s coach-horse at sight, and assure one’s foolish elders During this age we must, of course, exercise the mind on that, in spite of its appearance, it does not sting; to be able other things besides Latin grammar. Observation and mem to pick out Cassiopeia and the Piciades, and perhaps even ory are the faculties most lively at this period: and if we to know who Cassiopeia and the Pleiades were; to be are to learn a contemporary foreign language we should aware that a whale is not a fish, and a bat not a bird—au begin now, before the facial and mental muscles become these things give a pleasant sensation of superiority; while rebellious to strange intonations. Spoken French or German to know a ring-snake from an adder or a poisonous from can be practiced alongside the grammatical discipline of an edible toadstool is a kind of knowledge that• has also a the Latin. - practical value. In English, meanw)iile, verse and prose can be learned The grammar of Mathematics begins, of course, with by heart, and the pupil’s memory should be stored with the multiplication table, which, if not learnt now, will never stories of every kind—classical myth. European legend, be learnt with pleasure; and with the recognition of geo and so forth. I do not think that the classical stories and metrical shapes and the grouping of numbers. These exer masterpieces of ancient literature should be made the vile cises lead naturally to the doing of simple sums in arithme O bodies on which to practice the technics of Grammar—that tic. More complicated mathematical processes may, and 94 NATIONAL REVIEW
to
tirely
constitution.
have
gence
Formal
symptoms
It cursive
mar
neglect of
the disposed
Memory,
speaking,
from than
cation
they have about
much
science,
also necessarily
mandments. the
narrative
quainted add
At rich,
and “Kubla
matter memory-rhymes things
ogy
that
pose
diate
spontaneously
child’s
tendency
committed
whether
well
material
material
“subjects”
teachers,
tice. contains
ently
perhaps
It
is
argue
the
So
the HIS
Old
is
first
should
it
with
come
in
here
are
for
by
it
resounding
making
been
that
the
The
that
and
from
that
appear.
material
this
far
difficult
still
have
to
Reason.
also
might,
is
the
mind
Logic
grammatical without REMINDS
the
and
whether
Khan’),
to
beyond
it
for
should,
himself,
so,
with
the
is,
first
nothing
part,
the
a
is difference
that
which
who
(except, of
the
rational
the
forged
anything
to
these
will
full
to
in
lack
second,
be
pertness
is
handy
intuitive
child
modern
Logic
a
use At
is
to New
answer
in
sense
Creed,
at to Creation,
suppose curriculum,
memory
since
to
asked, immediately
themselves the
known
has
was,
root
strong
our
must
only
of
In
remain
the
polysyllables
try
which
the
for
this
his
in
we
be
me
things
the its
this
say
that
cannot
an
too
and
Testaments
the
answer;
of
story
and
has loose
the
the
curriculum of
will
fallen
the
as
postponed,
and
by
and
and
power second,
cause
and is:
master-faculties
have
age,
of second of
Latin
standards.
the
look final
at
course, stage,
is
should,
attractive
and
student
imaginative
departs
early
will
that
should the
it.
it
first,
been ready
next
the
content
should
so
key-exercise
secondary
be what
the
true;
of
Rebellion,
ends.
readily
everything the interminable
force
Lord’s
were,
therefore,
than
because
Still,
noted
remembered.
but
is
upon
soon whole
intelligible synthesis.
of
to
felt
genders),
time
probably
we God
grammar
it
the part
part
an
(like discredited, the
unconscious.
for
for
age, presented
I
of
entirely
analyze—particularly will
very
be
it
nearly
This
does
shows
be
rather
rational
keyed,
for are
will
as
to
The
enjoy it
jingle
Prayer,
as
exercise
in
age.
all that
is master-faculty
the
course,
of the
and
of
memorized
educational
the
appeal
precisely,
theology
fully
importance;
be
is
leave
a far
the
a
reasons
conditioned
the
and
the simply
we
the
which
will will
these
not
are
Latin),
reason
disrepute
insist
or great
as Those
Quicunque argument.
all the
in
its
gathering-together able
and Man of
or
Intelligent
was
unjustified:
from
(like
pupil
as
modern
Trivium.
understood
should
and
Trivium.
explanations
partly
the
to
be matter
well
an
receive their
matter
Redemption
(as, first Theologr.
not. Observation
those
There
tools
parts
remember
activities
the
to
observe
can
mistake
which
is
in
upon
we
which
Formal
to
our
the
attitude
at
common
shows
abundance
who
some
structure
for tackle
to
the
sharp
The
outline—i.e..
Latin
pupils’
but
should
work
into
because
is
become
this
of
almost
usefully
of
dicn,t1ittir!g
intellectual
rather
is
For
Ten
curriculum
vult).
an
What
nearly
questions,
Generally
have
doing
will
example. the
mistress-
the learning
no and
disagree
a
if
it that
to
modern
as
himself
of
I
period,
less
Logic.
which gram
imme
diver
things
theol
as.
of
single upon.
Com
-—and
those
on
is
prac
shall
time
edu
Dis
pass
sup
pres
that
and
rest
that will
less
this
en
the
we
ac
the its
to
so
in
so
be
of
as
as
of
a
particular (i.e., justified?
scope
ing
lending
argue
argument tional
ernment?
but are
the
instead
material
ers, than
by to take
but kinds taken
and says.
plays sons—on
try
speech
analysis
history shall
is
finger-tips: so
Logic the
p the
difference,
render tautological.
method correct, arc
children
Indeed, It upon
which
way
neglect
eTsons
History,
Our
Mathematics—-algebra,
Let
number
any
to
will
the
much
the
his
a prompt
a
form
of
of
grammar
its
the
the
the
to
in
extended
argument,
and
now
special
of
sub-department
by
history—a
be
universal
us
is
as
Logic
Reading
other
this
arguments
of
own
absorbing
itself
the
relations
of
place which
the
for
is
make
(i.e..
What
be
them
rule
the
instances rational
place
We arithmetic—will
whatever
we in about
at
“All
and
dramatic
now
related
aided
debate.
being,
and
since
not
henceforward
of
language
have
detection proper
kind.
discussion:
practical
hand the
This
objected
the
part
do
has
revelation,
art
to
shall
as
of
the
an
that
it
A
argue
by
of
quickly
was
invalidated
measurement,
will
of
assumptions
and intolerable.
conduct
in
every
establishment
by
what
Pert
fallen
the between
true. that
our
subject
of
for
of
argument
is.
But
is
to
for
structure
a
interest
at
logical
which
Theology
training
theology,
order
subject—will
individual
performances.
the
thus
proceed
a
simplified
B”
age not
knowledge.
arguing
and
criticism,
Dialectic.
(i.e., utility
writing
syllogism
some,
and
of
simple
vocabulary
even
with
syllogism
application
it
Another
age
review
Was
is
effect
that
can
neither
geontry. true.
we
and
Logic.
to
is
are
really get
exposure
meaningless
now
the
the
construction
against
to
by
how of
is
properly
if
to
convey
of
of
a
from
be
can
the
itself
their
that
correctly:
and
this
system
will
an
to
stated
of
the
rncrais:
Not
belief
those
the
or
intolerable they
course
our
of
dark
and
browbeat,
enter
Formal
My
in Christian
illuminating
On
is:
recast
cause
It
take
whose
behavior
concentrate
we
encourage
such
should
introduction
choral positive
kind
reason
this
with narrative
hypothetical
JANUARY
are
and
will
its
all
is
of
of
not material
provide
and
elders
were,
our
the
the
that
answer
mystery,
in
called
of
who
came
into
neither
of
invalid
particular
the
universal
and to
in
or ethical
and an
for
either
furnish
“If
of
dramatic Logic
a
morphology
special
of
major
thoughts).
ethics
the
pupil
Language
dogmatic
be
is
it
recitation
that
hypothetical
separate
it
thought),
the enactment?
of
conclusions
form
the
are
thing.
the
speech)
casuistry.
A, chould
will
is
the
to
and the
would
and
nor
more
taught
19.
much
anyhow
on
this
inference.
more
unprovable
today
and,
is
entirely
form
derived
young
will principles
young
premise
syllabus
then
prepared
nature
disfavor
material to
arrange
attention
best
propositions
ethics,
1979
of
illuminated
lyric
syntax
application
see that
form.
Many
st4tesman
advanced
“subject”
constitu
theology
have
make
side,
for
learn
as
and
nor
debates;
suitable
of
will
clarify
lies
possible
B”:
at
how
Geog
to
child,
What
such,
of
form. from
as based
gov
oth
is
and
and
and less
into les
our
for
our
the
not
es
the
95
its
we
to
be in
to
no
to
A.
in
or
in
it
0 0 raphy and the Sciences will likewise provide material for Dialectic. But above all, we must not neglect the material which is so abundant in the pupils’ own daily life. I) There is a delightful passage in Leslie Paul’s The Living Hedge which tells how a number of small boys enjoyed themselves for days arguing about an extraordinary shower of rain which had fallen in their town—a shower so local ized that it left one half of the main street wet and the other dry. Could one, they argued, properly say that it had rained that day on or over the town or only in the town? How many drops of water were - required to con stitute rain?—and so on. Argument about this led on to a host of similar problems about rest and motion, sleep and waking, es: and non esi, and the infinitesimal division of time. The whole passage is an admirable example of the spontaneous development of the ratiocinative faculty and the natural and proper thirst of the awakening reason for shown how to tell which sources are authoritative and definition of terms and exactness of statement. All events which are not. are food for such an appetite. Towards the close of this stage, the pupils will probably An umpire’s decision; the degree -to which one may trans be beginning to discover for themselves that their knowledge gress the spirit of a regulation without being trapped by and experience are insufficient, and that their trained in the letter: on such questions as these, children are born telligences need a great deal more material to chew upon. casuists, and their natural propensity only needs to be de The imagination—usually dormant during the Pert age— veloped and trained—and, especially, brought into an in will reawaken, and prompt them to suspect the limitations telligible relationship with events in the grown-up world. of logic and reason. This means that they are passing into The newspapers are full of good material for such exercises: the Poetic age and are ready to embark on the study of legal decisions, on the one hand, in cases where the cause Rhetoric. The doors of the storehouse of knowledge should at issue is not too abstruse; on the other, fallacious reason now be thrown open for them to browse about as they will. ing and muddleheaded arguments, with which the corre The things once learned by rote will be seen in new con spondence columns of certain papers one could name are texts: the things once coldly analyzed can now be brought abundantly stocked. together to form a new synthesis; here and there a sudden insight will bring about that most exciting of all discoveries: the realization that a truism is true. HEREVER the matter for Dialectic is found, it s, of It is difficult to map out any general syllabus for the course, highly important that attention should be focused study of Rhetoric: a certain freedom is demanded. In litera upon the beauty and economy of a fine demonstration or ture, appreciation should be again allowed to take the lead a well-turned argument, lest veneration should wholly die. over destructive criticism: and self-expression in writing Criticism must not be merely destructive: though at the can go forward, with its tools now sharpened to cut clean same time both teacher and pupils must be reads’ to detect and observe proportion. Any child who already shows a fallacy, slipshod reasoning, ambiguity, irrelevance, and re disposition to specialize should be given his head: for, when dundancy, and to pounce upon them like rats. This is the the use of the tools has been well and truly learned, it is moment when précis-writing may be usefully undertaken; to available for any study whatever. It would be well, I think, gether with such exercises as the writing of an essay, and that eath pupil should learn to do one, or two, subjects the reduction of it, when written, by 25 or 50 per cent. really well, while taking a few classes in subsidiary subjects It will, doubtless, be objected that to encourage young so as to keep his mind open to the inter-relations of all persons at the Pert age to browbeat, correct, and argue knowledge. Indeed, at this stage, our difficulty will be to with their elders will render them perfectly intolerable. My keep “subjects” apart; for as Dialectic will have shown all answer is that children of that age are intolerable anyhow; branches of learning to be inter-related, so Rhetoric will and that their natural argumentativeness may just as well tend to show that, all knowledge is one. To show this, and be canalized to good purpose as allowed to run away into show why it is so, is pre-eminently the task of the mistress- the sands. It may, indeed, be rather less obtrusive at home science. But whether theology is studied or not, we should if it is disciplined in school; and, anyhow. elders who have at least insist that children who seem inclined to specialize abandoned the wholesome principle that children should he on the mathematical and scientific side should be obliged seen and not heard have no one to blame but themselves. to attend some lessons in the humanities and vice versa. Once again: the contents of the syllabus at this stage At this stage also, the Latin grammar, having done its may be anything you like. The “subjects” supply material: work, may be dropped for those who prefer to carry on but they are all to be regarded as mere grist for the mental their language studies on the modern side: while those who mill to work upon. The pupils should be encouraged to go are likely never to have any great use or aptitude for math and forage for their own information, and so guided towards ematics might also be allowed to rest, more or less, upon the proper use of libraries and books of reference, and their oars. Generally speaking: whatsoever is mere appa
98 NATtONAL REVIEW ratus may now be allowed to fall into the background. person who has not the tools at his command. To learn six while the trained mind is gradually prepared for special subjects without remembering how they were learnt does ization in the “subjects” which, when the Trivium is com nothing to ease the approach to a seventh; to have learnt pleted, it should be perfectly well equipped to tackle on and remembered the art of learning makes the approach its own. The final synthesis of the Trivium—the presen to every subject an open door. and C tation public defense of the thesis—should be restored Before concluding these necessarily very sketchy sug in some form; perhaps as a kind of leaving examination” gestions, I ought to say why I think it necessary, in these during the last term at school. days. to go back to a discipline which we had discarded. The scope of Rhetoric depends also on whether the pupil The truth is that for the last three hundred years or so we is to be turned out into the world at the age of 16 or have been living upon our educational capital. The post- whether he is to proceed to the university. Since, really, Renaissance world, bewildered and excited by the profusion Rhetoric should be taken at about 14, the first category of of new ‘subjects” offered to it, broke away from the old pupil should study Grammar from about 9 to 11, and discipline (which had, indeed, become sadly dull and stereo Dialectic from 12 to 14; his last two school years would typed in its practical application) and imagined that hence- then be devoted to Rhetoric, which, in his case, would be forward it could, as it were, disport itself happily in its new of a fairly specialized and vocational kind, suiting him to and extended Quadrivium without passing through the enter immediately upon some practical career. A pupil of Trivium. But the Scholastic tradition, though broken and the second category would finish his Dialectical course maimed, still lingered in the public schools and universities: in his preparatory school, and take Rhetoric during his Milton. however much he protested against it, was formed first two years at his public school. At 16. he would be by it—the debate of the Fallen Angels and the disputation ready to start upon those “subjects” which are proposed of Abdiel with Satan have the toot-marks of the Schools upon them, and might, incidentally, profitably figure as set passages for our Dialectical studies. Right down to the We have lost the tools of learning that nineteenth century, our public affairs were mostly managed, were so adaptable to all tasks. We have and our books and journals were for the most part written, merely a set of complicated jigs, each of by people brought up in homes, and trained in places, which will do but one task and no more, where that tradition was still alive in the memory and almost in the so that no man ever sees the work as a whole blood. Just so. many people today who are atheist or agnostic in religion, are governed in their conduct by a code of Christian ethics which is so rooted in their unconscious assumptions that it never occurs to them to for his later study at the university: and this part of his question it. education will correspond to the mediaeval Quadrivium. But one cannot live on capital forever. However firmly 0 What this amounts to is that the ordinary pupil, whose a tradition is rooted, if it is never watered, though it dies formal education ends at 16, will take the Trivium only: hard, yet in the end it dies. And today a great number— whereas scholars will take both the Trivium and the perhaps the majority—of the men and women who handle Quadrivium. our affairs, write our books and our newspapers, carry Is the Trivium, then, a sufficient education for life? out our research, present our plays and our films, speak Properly taught. I believe that it should be. At the end of from our platforms and pulpits—yes, and who educate the Dialectic, the children will probably seem to be far our young people—have never, even in a lingering tradi behind their coevals brought up on old-fashioned “modern” tional memory, undergone the Scholastic discipline. Less methods, so far as detailed knowledge of specific subjects and less do the children who come to be educated bring is concerned. But after the age of 14 they should be able any of that tradition ,with them. We have lost the tools to overhaul the others hand over fist. Indeed. I am not at of learning—the axe and the wedge, the hammer and the all sure that a pupil thoroughly proficient in the Trivium saw, the chisel and the plane—that were so adaptable to would not be fit to proceed immediately to the university at all tasks. Instead of them, we have merely a set of com the age of 16, thus proving himself the equal of his mcdi plicated jigs, each of which will do but one task and no aeval counterpart, whose precocity astonished us at the more, and in using which eye and hand receive no training, beginning of this discussion. This, to be sure, would make so that no man ever sees the work as a whole or “looks to hay of the English public-school system, and disconcert the end of the work.” the universities very much. It would, for example, make What use is it to pile task on task and prolong the days quite a different thing of the Oxford and Cambridge boat- of labor, if at the close the chief object is left unattaineci? race. It is not the fault of the teachers—they work only too hard But I am not here to consider the feelings of academic already. The combined folly of a civilization that has for bodies: I am concerned only with the proper training of gotten its own roots is forcing them to shore up the tot LI CHL.U UIILCa dilL’ UCdI WILII LLIC ILIl ,illugvlc ijiass tering weight of an educational structure that is built upon of undigested problems presented to it by the modern sand. They are doing for their pupils the work which the world. For the tools of learning are the same, in any and pupils themselves ought to do. For the sole true end of every subject; and the person who knows how to use them education is simply this: to teach men how to learn for will, at any age, get the mastery of a new subject in half themselves; and whatever instruction fails to do this is the time and with a quarter of the effort expended by the effort spent in vain. D 0
JANUARY 19. 1979 99 0 0 0
SAINT SUMMA Chapteri. THD1VIAS CONTRA THE OFFICE OF THE WISE MAN “My mouth shall meditate truth, and my JkQLJI}NJJ\.S ENTILES lips shall hate impiety” (Prov. 8:7). to the [1] The usage of the multitude, which according Philosopher is to be followed in giving names to things,’ B has commonly held that they are to be called wise who order things rightly and govern them well. Hence, among other things that men have conceived about the wise man, JNJE: the Philosopher includes the notion that “it belongs to thc wise man to order.”2 Now, the rule of government and coi:: order for all things directed to an end must be taken from the end. For, since the end of each thing is its good, a thing is then best disposed when it is fittingly ordered to its end. And so we see among the arts that one functions as the its governor and the ruler of another because it controls art of end. Thus, the art of medicine rules and orders the the chemist because health, with which medicine is con the cerned, is the end of all the medications prepared by of art of the chemist. A similar situation obtains in the art miii ship navigation in relation to shipbuilding, and in the equip tary art with respect to the equestrian art and the called Trans1aed ment of war. The arts that rule other arts are the architectonic, as being the ruling arts. That is why University with an lntroduction artisans, artisans.devoted to these arts, who are called master and Notes, But, since of appropriate to themselves the name of wise men. ends of Noh-e Dame Press by these artisans are concerned, in each case, with the universal ANTON C. PEGIS, certain particular things, they do not reach to the Nohe Dame with end of all things. They are therefore said to be wise London ER.S.C. is said that respect to this or that thing; in which sense it (loza 30). 1. Aristotle, Topics, II, i 2. Aristotle, Metaphysics, I, z (982a i8). Summa Contra Gentiles BOOK ONE )D 6o 0. HE TRUTH OF THE CATHOLIC FAITH ing words: to meditate and speak forth of the divine truth, I have laid the foundation” (I Cor. “as a wise architect, which is truth in person (Wisdom touches on this in the absolutely wiseman, however, is 3:10). The name of the words my mouth shall meditate truth), and to refute the consideration is directed to the end reserved for him whose opposing error (which Wisdom touches on in the words also the origin of the universe. of the universe, which is and my lips shall hate impiety). By impiety is here meant the Philosopher, it belongs to the That is why, according to falsehood against the divine truth. This falsehood is con highest causes.3 wise man to consider the trary to religion, which is likewise named piety. Hence, the contrary to it is called impiety.° [21 Now, the end of each thing is that which is intended falsehood by its first author or mover. But the first author and mover of the universe is an intellect, as will be later shown.4 The ultimate end of the universe must, therefore, be the good of an intellect. This good is truth. Truth must consequently Chapter 2. of the whole universe, and the con be the ultimate end THE AUTHOR’S INTENTION IN of the wise man aims principally at truth. So it sideration THE PRESENT WORK is that, according to His own statement, divine ‘Wisdom testifies that He has assumed flesh and come into the world [i] Among all human pursuits, the pursuit of wisdom in order to make the truth known: “For this was I born, is more perfect, more noble, more useful, and more full of and for this came I into the world, that I should give testi joy. mony to the truth” (John 18:37). The Philosopher him of truth, self establishes that first philosophy is the science It is more perfect because, in so far as a man gives origin of all not of any truth, but of that truth which is the himself to the pursuit of wisdom, so far does he even now whereby truth, namely, which belongs to the first principle have some share in true beatitude. And so a wise man has principle is, all things are. The truth belonging to such a said: “Blessed is the man that shall continue in wisdom” things have the same clearly, the source of all truth; for (Ecclus. 14:22). disposition in truth as in being.5 It is more noble because through this pursuit man science, however, both [31 It belongs to one and the same especially approaches to a likeness to God Who “made all and to oppose the other. to pursue one of two contraries things in wisdom” (Ps. 103:24). And since likeness is the effect health and to elim r’Iedicine, for example, seeks to cause of love, the pursuit of wisdom especially joins man to to the wise man to inate illness. Hence, just as it belongs God in friendship. That is why it is said of wisdom that to the first prin meditate especially on the truth belonging “she is an infinite treasure to meni which they that use belongs to him to refute ciple and to teach it to others, so it become the friends of God” (Wis. 7:14). the opposing falsehood. It is more useful because through wisdom we arrive Appropriately, therefore, is the twofold office of the [4] at the kingdom of immortality. For “the desire of wisdom shown from the mouth of Wisdom in our open- wjse man bringeth to the everlasting kingdom” (Wis. 6:21). Aristotle, Metaphysics, 1, i (98th 28). the 3. 6. In the present chapter, I have changed wickedness in See below, ch. 44; also SCG, II, ch. 24 this is demanded b the sense. . Douay text to impiety, since 5. Aristo Metaphysics, Ia, 1 (993b 30). C C C)
HF\VE THE ARTS ou OF LEARNING AND COMMUNICATI(
A Handbook of the Liberal Arts
NE Benedict M. Ashley, 0.?.
ONLY with the collaboration of the staffs of the ST. XAVXEB COLLEGE SchooL SYSTEM and the
ALBERTUS MAGNUS LYCEUM
CHRIST THE rrrrrnIn ii PRIORY PRESS Dubuque—1958 INTRODUCTION
The Story of the Liberal Arts
ADAM
made for him. \\‘ Adam looked around at the world God had a place to work wi it just a place to eat and sleep? Was it just first did not even thu strength of body and skill of hand? Adam at of working. He on about eating or sleeping, and he had no need are all mine, h thought, “What strange things I see and hear! They what are they?” down he felt t Reaching up he touched the leaves. Bending In the sky grass and smelled the warm earth and the flowers. descend again. [0 1 saw the sun move to the zenith and begin to and in the bong shadow of the woods he saw the animals playing, lie heard the song of birds. to ii, As lie examined each strange thing, touched it, listened from t began to understand its nature. The lion was different other rabbit, a rabbit; yet every rabbit was the same as every his mind Ad every lion was the same as every other lion. In a mental w’u formed a name for each thing he saw and understood, all time call that stood for the nature of the thing. “The man named field, but he found all the birds of the air, and all the beasts of the helper like himself” (Gen. 2:20). AD/\M 3 0 n C 0 THE STORY OF TIlE LIJ3ERAL ARTS AND COMMUNICATION 4 11IE ARTS OF LEARNING Around them he heard the animals calling, some with squeak surprised that he was the only one of his whmic] At first Adam was not and growls and some in song. Adam understood these signs a human nature. He knew that he was tiier kind, the only thing with the animals made by instinct. They were natural signs because animals about him. He understood that it stood ha very different from the was a natural connection between the sign and the thing in food and their families. Adam was in was tIm they were interested only When Adam saw the footprint of a lion, he knew that this looking at the universe and trying to terested in all things, in just natural sign that a lion had passed by. When he heard the lion’s roam he could never tire of exploring A understand it. It seemed to him that he knew that this was the natural sign that the lion was hungry. because he had begun to realize the world about him, particularly first Adam and Eve themselves may have used only such natur world, must be still more great. Sea a diat Cod, who made so great a signs. They smiled at each other to show their love; they pointed there was no boundary to the ever and sky had their limits, but cried out to call each other’s attention. This natural language wa he ever finish exploring the mys lasting wonder of God. How could enough for the animals who had only their feelings to talk aboma a day when God would finally let tim tery of God? Would there be Adam and Eve, however, wanted to talk over all the things There was only one God, and Adam eye Adam see him face to face? interested them. Eve saw a lion and turned with questioning that he had been made. Why then it knew that it was in God’s image to Adam. “AJhat is it?” her eyes said. Adam wanted to explain just as there was only one God, so there was nature of the lime was it so strange that her, to tell her what he had learned about the lii only one man? He longed to tell her about all the things he had explored; about the world about him, he who Ion Adam realized that in being king over plans for the future; above all about God their Father, of all things. How day see fac jiiust imitate Cod, who is the King and Father made this world and whom he hoped they might some He could not create it and Adan could Adam be king and father to his world? to face. Natural signs were not enough to say all this, order. He could tend to stand for th nncw, but at least he could keep it in perfect with Eve’s agreement, began to invent new sounds could he share the not natmirn the garden, watch over the animals; but how natures of everything he knew. These spoken words were him, namely, wisdom greatest of all gifts which Cod had shared with signs, but signs whose meaning came from agreement, conventioiu: share this wisdom and md understanding? The animals could not signs. If only Adam had children of his own kind understanding with Adam. new language taught Eve all that he knew abomi was Father t ;im, chiiLcn Adam in this to whom he might be a father as God listened in delight. Adam explained i the world, and the world and God, and she might teach to understand the wonder of that puzzled iwi whom lie all so clearly! Still there was one thing he said wonder of God! world to know and USL the infinite lIe said that Cod had given them the whole problem, Adam awoke to find a corn tree of the knowledg After sleeping on this but had forbidden them to taste the fruit of the God had made for him to be his helper that he di pamon at his side whom of good and evil. When she asked why, Adam explained own. Adam understood that this was Eve, but that he wa in raising a family of his not know why God had given them this command, (Gen. 3:20). Adam and Eve were to Coi “the mother of all the living” sure that it must be for a good reason. In fact, it was because queen. How could they time world together, to be its king and He wanted to give them soon the greates shire his wished to test them. thoughts? Adam had named all things in He wanted to let then ilso share each other’s knowledge of all, the most wonderful secret. or concepts. Some of these were proper sine mimind with niental words see him face to face so that their happiness might be complete, each belonging to a single thing. Others names, like time name of Eve, of the world is only a sign of God’s perfect beauty as the name all the beauty mon names, representing a universal concept, to give them as the reward of their obedienc w<’re coin did This gift he intended “bird.” These were in Adam’s mind, but he woiiian, or “lion,” or and trust. teach them to Eve. mint know at first how to ThE STORY OF THE LIBERAL ARTS COMMUNICATION 6 TIlE AUTS OF LEAflNINC AND Yet even such savage people have discovered many arts of making to another who invented They did not earn their reward. Eve one day listened a living and recreation. They honor as heroes those the evil one, “who is a In the book of Genesis teacher, not to Adam, and that teacher was these arts and taught them to their tribes. devil suggested to Eve two of the sons of Adam and Eve, liar and the father of lies” (Jn. 8:45). The it is recalled that Cain and Abel, them to eat of the tree of life by their skill. “Abel the wicked idea that Cod had forbidden soon learned to earn the necessities lest they become his of the soil” (Cen. 4:2). Soon they because he wished to keep men in ignorance was a keeper of flocks and Cain a tiller have explained how im— for we read that among the equals. If Eve had asked Adam, he woiihl were not content with bare necessities envious of his children. a man named Jabel who “was the possiI)le it was for their heavenly Father to be descendants of Cain there was what the serpent said. dwell in tents and have flocks. His brother’s Bitt Eve did not wait to ask Adam about forerunner of those who persuaded Adam that, since the forerunner of all who play the harp and Curiously she ate of the fruit, and then name was Jubal; he was there were not only useful arts for the situ bet already eaten, lie must join her. the flute” (4:20-21). Thus into the wilderness, they that men require for life itself, but also Alter they were cast out of their garden feud, shelter and clothing to work all day to keep his family like music, which men needed to enjoy life and found life very hard. Adam had arts of recreation, to explore the wonders of the alive, lie had little time any longer to live well. and the children. Eve too was animals world and little time to give to Eve At times these savages seemed as poor and ignorant as the clothed and fed; she was often develop kept busy all day keeping the children about them, and yet it took great intelligence to discover and minds filled with a thousand Eve to tired and Impatient with them. Their any of these arts. It had been easy enough for Adam and hunger and anger, Adam and in worries and their hearts with restless pluck fruit from trees in the garden of Eden, but to earn a living and quarreled. Their children To Eve often misunderstood each other the wilderness was difficult, and that is why arts were required. might have taught them, if he bad to figure grew up missing much that Adam discover even so simple an art as making a tent, a savage had more peace at home. The had more time and if there had been out four things: grew up without that clear and wonderful children of Adam and Eve He had to fix clearly before him his purpose or end, exactly once possessed. To these boys and 1. vision of the world their parents what be was trying to accomplish; to make something that would and often very dull, girls life seemed rather puzzling keep out the rain, yet let out the smoke from the fire, and which children of Eve” also find the world Today we “poor banished could be easily moved. Often we give up trying to understand would pretty hard to understand. 2. He had to picture what the form or pattern of such a tent and bored. Who is there to teach it and arc content to be ignorant like. in tclcv:sjon movies, l)OOkS, and be answers? Many false teachers material It would be suitable to its the the truth. To get 3. He had to decide out of what give us lying answers when we look for newspapers Cod gave to make It. vision of truth and reality which and back the beautiful 4. He had to find the power and Instruments to cut, shape will have to study very hard. Adam and Eve w’e fasten this material. difficult As time went by, men discovered how to use even very S A V A C E S vessels materials. “Tubalcain was the forerunner of those who forge Eve and all their iron” (4:22). the wilderness the family of A1itin and of bronze and I king in and in mere work to recover their lost heritage of knowledge Nor were the savages content to live their lives dc,,ce:idants struggled things Their life was probably a great deal occasional recreation. Men cannot be content with the their test control over nature. and the jungle people of Africa, the satisfy mere animals. Adam and Eve had found their greatest like that of savage peoples of today, that of our own American Indians. dcserVNple of Australia, or some fl C C C OF TILE LIIIEIIAL ABTS 9 AND COMMUNICATION THE STORY 8 rilE ARTS OF LEABNING along the Nile liver. Somewhat later world, and in friendship with each other phrates Rivers, and in Egypt happiness in exploring the finally in Central he was jealous of Abel’s they were built in India, in Crete, in China, and and with God. Cain killed Abel because Cain himself had not deserved. Seth, America. friendship with God which cities they named Enos, who taught Today as scientists dig about in the ruins of these the third son of Adam and Eve, had a son the true God men who built them were experts in many arts. pray rightly to God. When men pray to find proof that the men how to With a more ample food so that they can serve him perfectly, they also Irrigation improved the art of agriculture. and scek to do his will could specialize world which God has given them. supply men could live in large groups, nd each want to know the truth about the on the law of God art, exchanging what he made for the other things lie Throughout ancient times some men pondered in a particular Adam had possessed. Tools and weapons were no longer made of stone but of and recovered something of the wisdom which needed. those living copper, bronze, and finally of iron. human race Was scattered over the world, Yet as the became very colorful as the arts of wiser men to teach them sometimes became The life of these cities also in small groups without of the physical games of living. Others developed many recreation flourished. In the ruins are evidences almost like animals in their way boa the practice of magic people: their ball—games, wrestling matches, chariot and also tried to gain still more power by of [lie arts, but be mental games as puzzles and checkers. The line the evil spirits. Gradually their ideas of God races—as well as such and the worship of and sculpture iii cruelties, lusts, and ambi arts made their buildings beautiful with paintings came clouded and colored by their own their Father in heaven, see also portrayed musicians, dancers, and actors. tunis. Some of them worshipped not God, which we their mother who had given only such arts, they would hut [lie earth, which they thought of as Yet if these city—dwellers had known return at death. As they for their discovery of writing that proves birth to them and to whom they would still have been savages. It was conduct and the world shows that they had l)egnn to got the true Cod, so their ideas about human they were truly civilized, because it and strange. They wrote clown business of nature in which they lived became twisted appreciate the value of human thought. have left their traces: because they saw the importance of living ac All over the world these savage people contracts and city laws the pictures they painted in the fixed principles. Thus their social thought was recorded the stone tools which they made, cording to backwoods and corneis also wrote down records of [he ntovcmrnls of t)u. caves, even their living descendants In the In writing. They these tri. which remain calendar. This was their thought about nature. Above the world. The simplest and oldest of stars and kept a many have ideas ;..i c.us the prayers and ceremonies by which they today still remember the true God, but all they recorded cruelty, and impurity. To all these thoughts they began to try to give clear tows which seem like a nightmare of fear, shipped God. God brought disasters LI id beautiful language and expression. When the human race had stink very low, in Genesis, to warn them the value of thought, they upon men, such as the great flood recorded Nevertheless, although they appreciated or be extinguished. After this of truth. The true ideas they that they must turn back to seek him did not always appreciate the value human race develop once imaginings that grew out warning he promised that he would let the recorded were also mixed with all kinds of had lost. In Genesis we read ho’ iiiore and strive to rise again to the glory it of their pride, ambition, rivalry, and hatred. useful piiipose, men l)ni]t the Tower of Babel (11:1-9), not for any to display their nor in order to worship the true God, but merely ANCIENT CITIES undertaking flue pride. As a punishment God made this ambitious rebuild paradise quarreling, confusion, and social division. As society men began to struggle and work to occasion of Outce more The into rival groups, each city tried to outdo the next years ago men began to build great cities. became divided on earth. Some 6000 skill, and finally each came to war with call Iraq, along the Tigris and Eu- in a display of power and first ‘erc in the coimtry we now ARTS 11 THE STORY OF THE LIBERAL OF LEARNING AND COMMUNICATION 10 THE ARTS to slaves who had 110 was common, and tile useful arts were left (Gen. 10:9) built up huge only in those arts which were the other. Great conquerors like Nemrod ambition to make new inventions. It was on cruel slavery. fitting for free men that the Greeks showed unique genius. empires based of thought the right idea of human life and an art. As men de Only a few men kept Ju the Olympic games athletics became them was Abraham, who lived near proportion, and control man’s relation to God; among veloped a keen appreciation for the strength, command he took his family they also learned to Babylon in the city of Ur. At Cod’s of the human body displayed in these games, home for them in Palestine, where and paintings that were out of these evil cities and found a make and appreciate buildings, statues, freed by Moses from the power The same sense of bal later, after his descendants had been strong, well-proportioned, and yet graceful. city of Jerusalem with a temple them to write stories and play’s, such of Egypt, they built their own holy ance and symmetry helped they kept the Sacred Scriptures of Sophocles, more dramatical dedicated to the one true Cod. Here as the epics of Homer and the tragedies did other peoples—their laws, their times. in which they wrote down—just us 1>’ told than those of former in beautiful and exact language. in all that they did led science, their prayers to God, all Finally, this search for clarity and order of books, seemed much like the the art of clear and orderly This sacred book, or rather library the Creeks to discover the art of arts, But while other ancient arts, because clear of tile other people of that period. which is called logic. It is the art of libraries destroyed, the Bible thinking for pitiful fragments, have been of every art and science. books, except it was in thinking is the basis of all books today. This is because reason or proof for what remains the best-seller To think clearly is to give the precise his Church. In Greece spired by God and preserved by to be true. There were many clever men man of ancient times, King ever we claim Bible we read about the wisest who were constantly arguing and talking In this “God gave to called sophists (wise men) wisdom which he taught his people. ideas. What one man said was Solomon, and the large and proposing new and surprising understanding exceeding much, and to doubt that it was Solomon wisdom and another claimed was false. Men began that Is on the sea shore. And the wisdom true, ness of heart as the sand be sure what was really true. of all the Orientals, and of the possible to of Solomon surpassed the wisdom who was truly wise but refused to be called three thousand parables: and Then appeared a man . also spoke that Egyptians. . . Solomon of wisdom” or a philosopher. He showed five. And he treated about trees anything but a “lover his 1oetns were a thousand and argument about what is true and what Is the hyssop that groweth out tile only way to settle an the cedar that is in Libanus unto terms. He was named Socrates, from fowls, and of creep false is to begin by defining your and he discoursed of beasts, and of men when he of the wall: to hear finally put to death because he angered And they came from all the nations and was what ing things, and of fishes. they were always talking without knowing all the kings of the earth who pointed out that the wisdom of Solomon, and from 4:29-34). It seemed that Solomon they were saying. heard of his wisdom” (HI Kings showed that in his old age he was led by Plato continued the work of Socrates and regained the wisdom of Adam. Yet His pupil had he began to not only define his terms, but must also into foolishness, and to please them to think clearly one must his pagan wives truths on which knowledge state his principles, that is, the basic worship idols. and he knew that to rests. In youth Plato excelled as a wrestler, must plant one’s feet firmly on throw an opponent in wrestling one that he established the first GREEKS. the ground. It was in a gymnasium here he made mathematics university called the Academy, and great wrestling of lands that the arts and sciences because it is by the hard intellectual it was not in thc’s most ancient the basic study, more youthful country, in mind is developed in tile art of logic. full flower, hut in Europe in a mathematics that the cairn to there slavery cities of Greece. Unhappily, even the ‘“ and busy’ 0 C THE STORY OF TIlE LIBEflAL ARTS 13 AND COMMUNiCATION 12 ‘IiIE ARTS OF LEARNING THE ONE TRUE TEACHER (or algebra) and its ap in the Academy were taught arithmetic invented by another These had already been earth by plication to music. The attempts of savage people to restore paradise on Also geometry was taught, although philosopher named Pythagoras. had ended in such disasters as [he flood. The at brought to perfection by Euclid, their corrupt arts it was only somewhat later that it was to restore paradise eu earth had by Ptolemy. tempts of the great ancient cities to astronomy fully developed search and its application ended in warfare and vaii-j schemes like the Tower of Babel, The Aristotle, who realized that succeed, but It too came It was the greatest of Plato’s pupils, of the Greeks after wisdom seemed at first to not only to mathematics but to all empire in which logic should be strictly applied to an end when the Romans established a world school, the Lyceum, with in Rome the of learning. He founded his own wisdom became only a tool to gain power and wealth, branches the firstcomp1ete laboratories, and there established made a god, and Rome began to go down to time sauuue a museum and is not emperor was showed that the chief task of logic all the foolish pride of previous civil curriculum of studies. lie destruction that had followed principles, but to make proofs or merely to define terms and to state izations. that there are four kinds of proof the ti-ne demonstrations. He discovered Of all the people in the world only the Jews had kept but they’ and hence four kinds of logic; idea of God, of his law, of the relation of man to nature; we can prove that a state The fate of their 1. Sometimes in studying the sciences kept themselves pure only by remaining narrow. This is demonstrative logic. of mixing with ment is certainly and exactly true. great wise man Solomon had shown them the danger we cannot prove a statement nnd they knew no way to couribine the wisdom of 2. Soum’times in studying the sciences foreign nations, proofs and keep searching. contained in their own l3ible, This truth exactly, but we can give probable the Creeks with the truth needed was stored up iii Jerusalem, and, like This is dialectical logic. that the whole world are reasons that is kept too long in storage, it had begun to mildew, ‘hmo is needed to convince people grain 3. Sometimes what and feed the famished nations? their emotions so that they will would open the granaries of truth which persuade them by moving had proved that by itself it could not restore para [lie truth and act on it. This is rhetoric. Mankind ac(ej)t unlikely place the true toucher of mankind, exitertain poopic by helping dise. Then from a most what Is needed Is to appeared. lIe seemed to be .1. Somelluuucs is poetics. the second Adam of the human race, and enjoy the truth. This nation. lie them to appreciate only a poor young workman, a carpenter of [lie Jewish a still grcatc’r school . ‘Jcx— Nor was lie a kini lime followers of Aristotle founded was not a student of the philosophy of the Greeks. (after it all our museums become a man like in Egypt, called the Museum like Solomon. He was the Son of God, who had ;nI(lna education spread to From there Aristotle’s system of save us and to teach all men by his example and his preaching. arc ulamnu’(l ), mind education us to and became [lie basis of all our the I ic Wi ioic western world not a student of the philosophers. He was has four main subjects Jesus Christ was system of education a student no one to teach him. today. Iii this supreme philosopher and teacher who required practice the useful arts by himself to master; just He gave an example to those who and the four types of mathematics also of fitting I. The four types of logic working for years as a carpenter. lie gave an example called the liberal arts. to [lie bame1umets of the listc(l. These are recreation, for lie did imot hesitate to come the world of the nature of man and teaching lie used stories which arc uumasterpieces of 2. Natural science, the study people. In his He corrected our understanding of nature in which he lives. poetics and of rhetoric. in the world follow the law of Cod’s man’s life. when he showed how all things scicncc, the study of all other visible crea :3. Social providence and how man has a dignity above of God. 4. Theology, [he study 15 AN]) COMMUNICATION THE STORY OF THE LIHEIIAL. AWlS 14 TUE ARTS OF LEARNING of life and society by this threat by showing how much greater was the tnres. He also corrected our understanding Jerome—defeated of God and neighbor. of Christ than that of the philosophers, although whatever teaching that all law is summed up in the love teaching about Cod himself, that was true in philosophy might be used in Christian education. Finally, he revealed to us the supreme secret truth hidden (except in period of disorder called the he is one God in three divine Persons, a The second great threat was the weakened by its failure to ac shadowy outlines) from all ancient thinkers. Dark Ages. The Roman government, true way we need never wholeheartedly, collapsed under the onrush of Ger Now that Jesus Christ has shown us the cept Christianity truth. He taught us all the barbarians from the north and Mohammedan barbarians from be in any doubt as to where to find the manic comes again, we have only south. During this dark time of war and confusion the Church great truths we will ever need. Until he the to understand it better, and kept patiently at work building the foundations of a new civilization. to remain faithful to that truth, strive will complete schools, especially those of the Order of in our search for the lesser truths that It was in the monastery use it s a guide not only kept alive, but even provided the Church and the help St. Benedict, that the ancient education was tlic 1tctiire. Our Lord has on faithful to his teaching. When purified of its paganism and given a new and truer form based of his grace to guide us in remaining Church, headed by his apostles the study of the Sacred Scriptures. he ascended Into heaven he left this educate the whole human race. restored in Europe; many of the barbarians and their successors, the bishops, to Gradually peace was that this work of educating the others were driven back. The Church at last was He warned his apostles, however, were converted, would not be completed before great schools called the universities. Here the world would be a difficult task which able to establish the understand what the Church was and the Museum was restored, except that he comes again. Many would not wisdom of the Lyceum the bishops were trying to sup wisdom sat a new queen, no longer natural trying to do and would claim that now on the throne of teachings which were based on the teaching of Christ. in press the truth, because they were correcting theology, but Sacred Theology of the Middle Ages we see Sacred Theology only partly true. the beautiful cathedrals Church would go on gathering in stone, surrounded by all the arts and sciences which Jesus promised that gradually the portrayed they were to be found, up medieval education. They are symbolized as follows: together the fragments of truth wherever made fitting them into the broad framework deansing them of error, and I. Tim LIBETIAL Awrs: of his own teaching. A. The Trivium or three ways to knowledge: 1. Grammar (and with it poetics), symbolized by the figure of Donatus, a Roman teacher who wrote the Latin grammar- CHRISTIAN EDUCATION book used in all medieval schools. 2. Rhetoric, symbolized by the figure of Cicero, the great Roman the world, the Church had In order to bring the truth of Christ to orator. forces of darkness to put out logic), to overcome three great efforts of the 3. Logic (including both demonstrative and dialectical the libt which she held so high. symbolized by the figure of Aristotle. absorb the was the effort of pagan Rome to Tie first threat B. The Quadrivium or four wags to knowledge: that it could not destroy them by persecu Clirislians, when it Found algebra, symbolized by the figure of Pythagoras. to water down the truth of Christ’s 1. Arithmetic or tion. ‘lhe pagan philosophers tried of Euclid. philosophy. The 2. Geometry, symbolized by the figure turn it into a mere form of pagan teaching and Music, symbolized by the figure of Tubalcain (rather than Church—teachers like St. Ignatlus of Antioch, 3. Fathers of the iii Ages bells were 1 great Augustine, and St. his brother Jubal, because the Middle St. Basil, St. Gregory Nazianzen, St. St. Irenis, n ,Th C) n c5 THE ZIHEHAL AWl’S TilE STOHY OF COMMUNICATION 16 ‘rilE AHTS OF LEABNING AND The resuit was the decay of religious unity which we cafl Protes and Tubalcain was the inventor favorite musical instrument tantism, and the growth of indifference to spiritual things which we of metal work). call Secularism. The progress in art, in science, iii iuivention, and in had their 4. Astronomy, symbolized by the figure of Ptolemy. geographical exploration were all achievements which by the Church, but men forgot woman with her - roots in the education given Europe 11. Piin.osornn’ (science), symbolized by a noble Church as the enemy of progress. The and her feet on the earth: this and began to attack the head in tile clouds deprived symbolized Church, in spite of these persecutions which for a long time A. Natural science and with it medicine, sometimes disciple her of much of her educational influence in Europe, continued the figure of Galen, the great Greek doctor and by patiently to spread her missions into other lands. of Aristotle. symbolized B. Social or moral science and with it law, sometimes codi by the figure of Justinian, the Christian Emperor who CJIRJSTIAN EDUCATION TODAY fied the Roman law. by Plato, who C. Metaphysics or natural theology, represented has finally become pagan We are living in a time when the Church regarded by the earlier Middle Ages as the great was world-wide and is teaching all nations. Yet the world is full of wars theologian. and quarrels that make it difficult for the voice of the Church to by a queen holding the Sacred Ill. SACDnED lticoi,ocv, symbolized be heard. In our own country we have two systems of schools. There Aquinas, the Common Doctor Scriptures, or later by St. Thomas are the Catholic schools which teach the wisdom of Christ in a of the Church. complete way. Most of our young citizens, however, attend non- Doctors of ‘iThis system of education was perfected by the great Catholic schools. was the chief, along with [lie Church (of whom St. Thomas Aquinas These non-Catholic schools (which are excellent in many ways) St. Albert the Great, and St. flonaventtirc and St. Anthony of Padua, actually had their origin in the schools of the Church but are now Canisius) and by educators latci St. Robert I3cllarmine and St. Peter separated from her Influence. They still teach much of what they de ha Salle. and St. Angela like St. Ignatius Loyola, St. John Baptist learned from the Church and from the civilization which she [we- of all educatie.i t;.!y, even of that Merici. It remains the foundation served and developed, but they are required to leave out the teaching given in non-Catholic schools. of many truths, because there is so much disagreement about basic not wholly overcome. The third great threat to the Church is still principles among non-Catholics. beyond the borders of The reign of Christ had to be extended Your own school is not perfect, because it has been hindered expansion brought dangerous Europe to the whole world. Yet this very from developing perfectly by all the confusion and troubles Ira the East with its romantic temptations. The Crusades opened up the world. Nevertheless it has a sound Catholic foundation and is striving of the New World luxuries and its mysterious cults. The discovery to give you the best possible education, to give you the whole teach and power. The opened up the West as a source of enormous riches ing of Christ, and to show you how all the other knowledge which the with the growth of the interest and life (II Europe became very colorful human race has discovered can be fitted into this framework the Renaissance. Dazzled in literature and fine arts which we call developed still further. and glory, the rulers of Europe began to struggle with worldly riches Because of outside pressures and influences on Catholic schools, the in supremacy. They even sought to make from our with each other for the names and arrangement of courses are often different their own purposes rather than those stitiulions of the Church serve traditional curriculum, although the subjects taught are still essential- of Christ. AND COMMUNICATION THE STORY OF THE LIBERAL ARTS 19 18 TIlE ARTS OF LEARNING “English” we include all the 3. Rhetoric. ly the same. Thus under the term called “algebra.” The term branches of logic. Arithmetic is today 4. Poetics. “moral science” or “ethics.” involves these four “social science” has replaced the older term Everything you say or read, even a comic-book, general science, biology, demon Natural science is split into many branches; types of logic. You will learn all four together, emphasizing of chemistry, physics, psychology. strative logic, then seeing how its rules apply to other kinds logic. Catholic schools began when to do three things, the three processes which The special work of improving This means learning all Catholic teaching be placed Plato, and Aristotle showed are needed for c]ear thinking: Leo XIII In 1879 recommended that Socrates, and theology of St. Thomas I and II). under the guidance of the philosophy 1) To define your terms (Chapters Pius XII, has repeated this advice (Chapter 11). Aquinas. The present Holy Father, 2) To state your principles framework with all the new (Chapter III). and urged us also to fill in the Thomistic 3) To prove your conclusions discoveries of our age. in this great story of the In your lifetime you will play a part women since Adam, you will find advance of truth. Like all men and the four great fields of that living involves problems concerning human knowledge; and expression, because it 1. Liberal arts, or arts of thinking for you to think clearly, is these arts that will make it possible to study well, to teach and persuade others. of the world and of 2. Natural science, because our knowledge think and do, and human nature is the basis of everything we of all human progress. guide in living with 3. Social sciences, because they are our others. God and ‘the pur 4. Christian doctrine, because it tells us about pose of human life, of all be mastered, since to Of these the liberal arts must first using the arts of study would be try to study other subjects without in elementary school you to try to fight without weapons. Already these subjects, but now you are have been preparing to study all you will complete your liberal entering a new phase of education when arts studies. find a guide to this work of In the rest of this book you will liberal arts. You will learn to think completing your knowledge of the by mastering four types of clearly and to read and speak effectively, logic: 1. Demonstrative logic. 2. Dialectical logic. 0 0 0 AIITS COMMUNICATION THE STORY OF THE LIBERAL 21 20 THE ARTS OF LEARNING AND 2. Logic is a liberal art by which our reason is enabled to give a QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION right mental order to the things it knows, so that it may pro clear thinking? ceed in an efficient and safe manner to attain truth. 1. ITow do our emotions interfere with frequently misunderstand each 1) Demonstrative logic guides us in attaining scientific, that 2. Why do parents and children is, certain and exact, truth. other? Why do friends sometimes quarrel? women, besides those listed in 2) Dialectical logic guides us in choosing the more probable 3. Can you name some other men or and sciences? If you were opinion, when we do not yet know enough to have scientific this chapter, famous for each of the arts sciences in a modern truth. going to symbolize each of the arts and each art and science? guides us in persuading others to right opinion cathedral, whom would you pick to represent 3) Rhetoric school, rather and action, when their emotions might incline them to the are the advantages of attending a Catholic 4. What opposite way. than a non-Catholic school? Is taught In your school in its 4) Poetics guides us in recreating others with the contempla 5. Can you place every course hlch 22? tion of beautiful deeds and the quieting of restless emotions. proper place in the outline on page 3. A sign is something which leads to the knowledge of some thing other than itself. 1) A natural sign is something which leads to the knowledge DEFINITIONS of something other than itself because of a natural similar ity or natural connection between them. task. There is no use 2) corwentional sign is something which leads to the knowl Memorizing may seem to be a very tedious A facts, but to memorize defini edge of something other than itself because of human custom in memorizing a great many random concepts in a science and usage. tions tind classifications of the fundamental Such definitions and universal sign or concept is one which signifies or art is the most efficient way of studying. 3) A distributive orderly wformation in a each and every one of many things. classifications summarize a great deal of a nature possessed by If you have Lrouble in .wdy very short and easily remembered form. 4) A singular sign or concept is one which signifies one single because you waste much of your jug for examinations, it is prOl)ably thing. the important terms in the time on unimportant points. If you list and their classification, you subject and memorize their definitions prepared. It is important, however, to will be quickly and thoroughly word in a good definition memorize a definition exactly, since every is chosen with care. acquired by practice of making 1. An art is an intellectual ability something in a reasonable way. ability, acquired by practice, 1) A servile art is an intellectual mind in a reasonable way. of making something outside the ability, acquired by practice, 2) A liberal art is an intellectual mind in a reasonable way. of making something within the AND COMMUNICATION 22 THE ARTS OF LEARNING
CHRISTIAN EDUCATION
(A classification to be memorized)
Sacred Theology Theology Mth hilosophy) Principal subjects: Social Sciences and related The Sciences servile arts PART ONE
Natural Science
Algebra (or arithmetic, the science of numbers) Christian pure Education (the Art Mathematics Geometry 140g1c as an science of magniftd (in which scientific logic is best exercised)
applied, in the other Tool subjects: sciences and arts The Liberal Arts by demonstrating: resolving Logic intellectual ( Scientific difficulties by investigating: Logic Logic Dialectical by removing Ltoric emotional ( by recreating: difficulties Poetics (with Grammar of all languages) 0 .ci. J
A CATHOLIC SCHOOL c By THEODORE BRAUER, Pi.D
AND OTHERS 4
B. HERDER BOOK CO. BROADWAY, ST. LOUIS, MO. • 15 & 17 SOUTH AND W. C. 33 QUEEN SQUARE, LONDON, 3943
ASSU1’IPT!ON COLLEGE LWRAR a
ST. THOMAS ON STUDY 15 CoLLflkJ MA c7 ceaselessly.. Desire to kee to ourseif, if you wish to reach 7 intimacy wit ci 2B i’ntirteinis to all. yj tn , th affairs oLntheL.peQple. Do not bfan ii r...wi1bnpne, c. J2canse too mJ1C1LfaJTiiliari breeds contempt and is an abundant source of distraction from Nyer, under anjr circumstancesjnvoive yourself with theaviiJies and talk II of the..ouisicle world. Above all, avoid all useless visits Strive I rather to walk constaUV]i otstepsogoo5nd holy.... ;i; ST. THOMAS ON STUDY mçp. Py no attention to the source of a lesson, but memorize nny tici’fnl atlvfr.e you may hear. Besure that you understand what you read and hear. Never leave a doubt unsolved. Take N; writings of pains to lay up all you can in the storehouse of memory, as he y MA of us, looking over the numerous dis does who desires to fill a vase. Do not try to know things that I 6 St. Thomas, wonder at the tremendous energy seri are above you. played, as well as the great learning. The more By following these ways, you will all your life send forth to ous will be prompted to ask: “How should I study and bear both branches and fruit In the vineyard of the Lord The attain what become as nearly as possible like this saint?” of hosts. If you take these words to heart, you will desire. God be with you. Angelic Doctor himself has answered this question you One of the brothers for us in one of his many works. As usual in the saint’s writings, we find ourselves moved by St. in the Dominican Order, probably with more material than we can easily digest. This to him, asking the Thomas’ great learning, wrote letter was obviously written for a student, but that in the following same question. St. Thomas replied is no guaranty that it is simple. In his introduction to letter: the Summa theologica, St. Thomas says he is treat the subject “in a manner fitted to the instruction have asked me, John, my clear brother in Christ, how ing You spite of this, our theologians today you ought to study to amass the treasures of knowledge. of beginners.” In matter is the fol The advice that I would give you on this have the greatest difficulty in understanding all that into the deep lowing: B n1.irniiniic tn plunge immediately is contained in this great work. Let us, then, at lead to IL .sea of wisdom. but advance by the streams that tempt to analyze these words in order to apply them nrrivn t theprofnnn& Be” hy simpiP things you in our daily lives. In doing so, we shall find the help of mine be your rule. Hence, let this counsel valuable and indispensable. In the seven to be slow to.speak,. and slower still in j.. of others 1_7 I advise you Paul Nazarius, O.P., wrote an guçnUngplaQc9f talk. Cherish the purity of your heart. Pry teenth century John V
0 0 0 ST. THOMAS ON STUDY 17 16 THOMISTIC PRINCIPLES C excellent commentary on this work for his fellow true because imm inliIyi tli root QficflOWledge. religious.1 Father Sertillanges, O.P., also comments For us, however, .tKos. igsre more knwable on this letter in parts of his work, La vie intellec which are more eoncret anisensibie, becatte man, le.ct of through tuelle. Both of these writers throw much light on • the inte&ctua1sreatures, rnuim whose proper ohjerl- is the concrete singular. the writings of their illustrious fellow Dominican. senses The first advice given by St. Thomas is: “Be not For example, it is easier to show a man that this • particular thing, a certain tree, exists, than it is to anxious to plunge immediately into the deep sea ol show him that God exists. Still, considered in them wisdom, hut advance by the streams that lead to. selves, the existence of God, which is necessary, is ôrJ lit it. Here St. Thomas advises the student to follow more knowable than the tree’s existence, which is ‘ertain order in attaining knowledge. No one limited matter. In the light of what has been said, should attempt_to—undcr’tand things oTa higher. by the first maxim of St. Thomas means that, since wis nature until he has mastered the more elementgy. dom the highest science which man can attain,. Aristotle says that “wisdom is knowledge of cer, is we must approach WLhrough the lower scknces, (first) principlesan4 causes!” Furtherhe. says that are more knowable for u,In another of his wisdoms the most absolute and most exact of alL which he sets forth the order of learning. He the sciences, and that the wise man not only knows AWorks theconclusions drawn from principles but also sees f,khaL1he_studen should rt .larr! Jogic and then and thus prepared for the physical the trnli of tleprinciples themselvesIn his com f( maihematics, be disciplines.imely. the natural sciences. Hav.ing mentary on this latter passage the saint says that Il mastered these, theicady for the study of the wise man-att ins to the first principles of being • philosophy, which Aristotle cjied_wjsdm.. For St. // whiich_re more knciwable in themselves but less . V ThQmas, however, the science of theology was the! known hy us. By this he means thatjhe more irn-. J \highest science ..andmoreproprical.leclyisdom. material and abstract things, as the more remote Thus the student, afçphilosopy, will study theol are moreicriowable in themselves. This is. causes, ogy. It_wasia sucKaTheginner” in theolog]li..’ 1 Father Nazarius will be found in D. Thomae Aqulnatis \ The text of \the saiii wrote his Sumnia theologica. Monita et Preces. lam tertio eddit R. P. Fr. Thomas Esser, O.P., Fader bornae, 1890. No further reference will be made to it specifically, but • The fundamental notion that he stresses in the a large part of this chapter is an interpretation of this commentary, as this latter work and the first advice of will be evident to any who will consult the original. prologue of 2 Metaphysics, Bk. I, chap. 1, 982a. Commentary on the Dc Trinitate of Boethius, q.5, a. 1, ad3. ‘Ethics, Bk. vi, chap. 7, 1141k, 16—20. ST. THOMAS ON STUDY 19 18 THOMISTIC PRINCIPLES conversation also the saint advises restraint. Stud is order. The proper order in intellectual his letter is- a full-time tislçanLiny diversion of thisiind. a pgression from a principle which) know1egcJs should be in the nature of mental relaxation. ind iinclerstandablJor us to .a cmiusioii( is clP1r much..wi]Lweak,en hhit of thought by exsive,, 8 i tn he understooi. Then, having arrived at which development of the imagination, thereby makingi!c.-” we in him lice it as a princir” thic concliisinn, latter hard to control in the orderly process of think conclusion. However, — ieach a further ingjn the Summa theotogica where he is discussing , Jliabits, St. Thomas says:Hence when man cease 4o make use of his intellectual habits, strange fan -01\ 1J des1, sometimes in opposWito them, arise in his fancies be, as it S C’ imaginath,n; so that unless those R. erecutff or kept J,ack by frequent use of his in tellectual habits man becomes less fit to judge arighf L11Lb*t the con Idle Talk and Its Relation to Study arid’ &ometimes is even wholly disposed to ‘27 diminished to speak. and., trary,, and thus the intellectual habit is Next St. Thomas says: “Be slow frcm act± places of talk’ He is not or.even wholly destroyed by,vessattQn slUwer still in frequenting also makes this point. He says hero as oondemning ordinary Father Sertillanges to be understood worker has no time for such things as re advises the student to restrain that the speech. Rather he visits which bring new obligations, neigh is such a facile organ that many ceptions, his tilk.Jhe tongue borhood affairs, and the whole complicated ritual it excessively. It is a common are tempted to use life which so many worldly men curse men who attempt to cover the of an artificial thing to observe Later we shall see that a certain amount of their minds with voluminous, in secret.6 naked ignorance of this activity is required, but the intellectual ought words. Evidently they hope to impress ill-fitting to remember that this should be reduced to a mini quantity where quality is lacking. Such others by mum. men would do well to remember the saying, “It to be silent and be thought a fool, than to 1 is better ‘Summa theol , Ta ITae, q.53, a.3. speak and remove all doubt.” Then, too, some seek ‘A. D. Sertillanges, O.P., La vie intellectuelle (Paris: Desclée, \ p.56. refuge from thought in prattle. In this matter of 1934),
0 0 C C ST. THOMAS ON STUDY 21 PRINCIPLES 20 THOMISTIC case of drunkards, hi whom the use of reason is fettered or hifldereLT Prayer and the Life of Study are other places where he takes up this “Cherish the purity of your There The next advice is: Incornparing the various pleasures. thQjnfluence of sin on> •same question.8 Here .he adverts to Ii ayg that thoci of touch, food, and sex are th hrt” the oE rCSQP.-. Sfte. Of these thr, the most violent is the thJifc it is clear, from the most violent. forces in the life of the sinner, sex. In the spme place he shpw thatall Thomas, that the student pleasur&of following words of St. vices weaken man’s intellectua!_pration if he is to think clearly. For. carnal musticeen himself pure both in theileld of science and in theiin1erstanding c±pracJples. Thus the man striving for intellectual 5of teason in three.ways. Bixlily pleasures Pti0iIi_stri_parLkII]a1lyakidbese istraction ecause we a a reat-deal vice. eason o atten w Ic p eases us. Now, when the Since sin Ic cnclLajljndrance In the life-of--reason, of attention to that in, fixed on one thing, it is either weakened ells_usto “prny ceacelessly,” For tion is firmly from them; the ext_precept , €1’ to other, things qJtJs cntir?Jyithdrawn Je..conf1dnt...of respect either It entirely hin-. only &Ith hhelp_oLQacLcan.we ...nncLthusiithe bodily pleasure is great. The difficulty of the sinless concentrating the mind’s ittcj& ycrcommgtenipjatiQn. ders the use of reason, by to in all the lives of the saints, where 4 (5o?J itliinders it a greatdeal. life is attested onitself or else thgt. Annther some pleasures, esperilIy thngp their struggles with temptation are told. of reason. In this con we get from it in in excess, arecopttai:y to the order aspect of prayer is the assistance ari bodily pleasures destroy t the. Philosophersay&Ibat i1-tp lif nf nection of pnidencc. althougb the power of ju.dgrpt characteristic say that he always spent time praying before he which theyartppc&;. not destroy4udgment to thiiiLjprayer I they-do .aIriangi are began swdying.. Further, instance, that the three angles_of Foxipyerjbe for impedes both kinds of suckas to encourage knowledge. If.’ eqito two ri btagIes.Pistraction bodily and the this nf GodJt is irdi hy hinceringIhe_re’con; since mind is raised to God judgment. ai:tàzn alteraii1n the jçcy of the body and other sensir pleasure is fo1Iowd by takenawayfrmniJg the other passion, inas us greater even than in the case of ble thingc, 1-ims making mGrcxeceptiy.QJcpow ejmentIy affected toward a much as the_appett thing. Now such bodily dis “Ia IIae, q.33, a.3. present than toward an absent 811a IIae, q.l5, a.3. reason, as may be seen in the turbances hinder the use of
cl -‘t5”
45c 22 THOMISTIC PRINCIPLES ST. THOMAS ON STUDY 23 edge. On this question Father Sertillanges says’ all things, would never have told the student to re that seiencjjcnowIedgc...through cauucLthat frain from all other activity. It is true, however, that Ic calls for most of us there is abundant opportunity for this other activity, but we experience difficulty in or ganizing our lives so that we have time to ourselves for study. Father Sertillan es has a bgfl pas- giLppint “Sec usion is the workshfX— Ihe rnind, interior solitude and silence are its twç nooks. All great things, redemption included, have heeiips.cp.ared in the desert (i.e., in solitude). . . . Toward Others The Student’s Attitude Wlc’ the calm of silence comes upon you and the The next part of the letter contains elements that, aciecljire bums alone, far from the noise of the at first, seem to yntradict one another, for St. streets, and when peace which is the tranquillity of Thomas says: “Desire toi pjurse1f if ypp_wsh , orIle.r establishes order in your thoughts and re to reach intimacy with God. jk courteous to afl,p searches, then at last are you ready to learn, and j te nn_nth Do not be fimiliarwithanyone-hecaiise4oomuch familiar The next sentence seems to be out of context since ity breeds contempt and is an abundant source it advises us in respect to others, and the one just distraction from study. Nevpr. irn(lPr any cirdum- .7 above advised us to keep to ourselves. However, we 5t.9nrPc involve voiirselfig.itli the activitieandiaL must realize that we are men and have obligations of—the niikirlpwOrlcL. O}) avoid all useless (c>7 which are not intellectual. These must be fulfilled if we are to live as human beings. We have all ex perienced that exigent courtesy which seems to draw us into the world and away from study. Here Thomas is not advising such courtesy for its ow sake. Rather. he Is referring—to an aspect of dis every day devoted to study will assure one of an in courtesy that will hinder the intellectual life more F-... tellectual destiny. St. Thomas, who was moderate in than this other courtesy could. For if we are dis Op. cU., p. 44. ° IbId., pp. 61 f.
)EIi?riq,f .‘owt(f i4 ‘ w’#h G ..cj ? estft 4 QU4€ILL5 4c I1 I3?- .ç 4c. 1k -l4cifr ,Uut’ qto ctHevctlc.1 4144 ‘.tt Jdr01ck-ii êfc.n ,—. C,,1 bi 1 q cif’ 4cJ,v -iB (M(CWIQ ... +IWct1 1,12 A,1kk( LA,OrIJ i-k 4hiIl1 10’,j 4.1 oL’sJe Ijv..1de yoI1r.e I-is 1-k (Th C 24 THOMISTIC PRINCIPLES ST. THOMAS ON STUDY 25 courteous, we are likely to make enemies and breeds contempt, but rather because of the kip&f others against us. In so doing we can make the ma_ iDontempt that iLgives rise to,.There is p k[ulof lenal conditions of life so difficult_thai- we wilL. c_ontempt that should be endured because it is a ever find time to study. In this respect Father. source of merit for us if we accept the grace to bear Sertillanges advises us to “buy our solitude” with it. On the ni-her hand, contempt arising from fa courtesies and favors_-to- those around iis,_. Further, miliarity is destructive of our good name, which we courtesy, or the consideration of others, is com are commanded to preserve. Then the second rea tnanded by the natural law, and the student striv son given by St. Thomas is in accord with what he, ingJor perfection must-cultivate this virtue alo!.g.. has said before; namely. that familiarity also ghes with the others.., rise to habits and acts that diminish the intellectual Next St. Thomas says: ‘:PayittefnntoJhe. vji:til. affairs of others.” Comm as it does after the ad- isof the same c1tegn7 asth vie ourtesy,ihiscaaonly.-inean.-that--we-are Jea1ing with curiosity about the affairs of oihrs,. f1 nLto be unduly.occupied with the affairs of others. onJhjjne is more specific. It warns us especially We are all curious about the things that other peo to old the many fruitless contacts with the pjde
ple nre doing. Witness the prevalence of gossip, no world. Unless there are works of mercy which duty - oniy among women, with whom it is proverbial, but and charity command, it were better that we refrain
also among men. Such curiosity is a distraction to - from ordinary sccular life. There are some necessary serious thinking. It is often manifested in an inor relations and, p_ccjheyire.neeessary, theyioim part dinate preoccupation with the daily papers. Most oL of fur livec even ic intelJegtuflls )Z.We0.flOt sepa th sQcalIed newJçjr.ppers is merely printed rate the intellectual from the man. ILisouriask to gsip. The saint warns against such curiosity for bring them into harmony with intellectuality in such.. two reasons. First, it takes a great deal of good time a way that they not only do not hinder it. but serve could better be used for tudy; and secondly. it iL[his is always possible. The.1giyen_txa1 gives rise to fancies as does idle talk.. or tluity is never lost: rither the cure that_is— In the next statement St. Thomas advises against devoted to them is a part of the intellectual oc familiarity, and this for two reasons’t breeds tion nnd could be inimical, to it only if we werelo.. contempt; and it distracts us. We are not consider,.that vo,cptio_n abstractly. as separated from advised to avoiF1miliarity precisely because iL providence. Neither_ithJm.tQfgQj I
l.,Ii 27 ST. THOMAS ON STUDY 26 THOMISTIC PRINCIPLES holy Men gifimate recreation and amusementJiQweyr, W The Example of Good and not to becomebusybodies. Worldli co Y” must take care Here St. Thomas says:StIthteratheL.to—waik ( guarded against, will de hply ‘u.’ As ness, urss itis carefully shrntly in the 1ontstep&fgoQd an who is searching for truth will arrive atIhe_Lw stroy the life of stuy. :He has .4rl hefnre, the chirlent words of ChristLIv1y he Thus this rule should always renernkr.-the truth only by knowing Truth itself. of this wor1d.’ life of virtue., kingdom is not means that we should strive for the asJücrnphasize what he ha We learn Then Si_Thomas, Now virtue is not taug_.s sciencej. the student to avoid useless. example. There saliL before, advises virtue from others byj ngiii 47 it well to remember the words of the those who hayQ. visits. Here is fore the best tepcher,j,f virtue are ion of Christ. who said that he us a mul- author of the linitat led virtuous lives. TheJhureh hasgiven never went out among men that be did not return every occupation. It i unless. titude of saints representing less a man. A person becomes lost in a crowd those fitting to our particular task because in the for us to choose by he keeps a firm hold onhimself, 1ifi nncl try to acguirp th virtues exemplified ‘himself, being lost in that ,zltm. in inikctuaL. yrowd no man knows these nien,Jhe particular virtue ofjJe the multitude. Thus the mind Is dis-. neggence and vain ego which Is is studiousness. Its extremes are persed in the extejor life. SffliJcpjmwK..s,olitude these exfreme$huiinQt fr you must curiosity. Thi1rstpf.. will impoverish you. Because of your work if he only rerncrnker&..thatintel of life, fect the student preserve the feeling of the commosoul, is his very being seçpnçl was off from corn lectual operation This is impossikie if you cut yourself when St. Thomas spoke of the neces if you know only a condemned qf th miinit-itinn with human beings. of arriving at the sea of wisdom bywy man becomes timi& sity last par,t dream humanity. An isolated str’amc. lie deals with it again in the he staggers about in the real - things.. abstracted, bizarre: the letter, where he says: “Donot try.tuicnow has just come off hispJç thaLmatter all world like a sailor who that are above you.” Study,, and for upon everyone sa’pppsition”_to - worship, prayc, seems to look life, must alkiw a proper place for a syllogism, or a case for his note-book. Father Ser be put into and meditation on the things of God. infinite riches of the real should be a fool’s play to. Always the tillanges says: “It is an abuse and no longer , visited in a spirit of contemplation.’ so much that you no longer pray, study ward orihe._ 11 Cf. thid., pp. 71 if. meditate, no longer read the sacred ,n ‘c4 ty57vt -hn€ r’t 0 0 i’) C C, 28 THOMISTIC PRINCIPLES ST. THOMAS ON STUDY 29 of the cainN or great men to shiny so muk.. writings The Student and the Teacher that you forget yourself andjnyour cih. i.he object of your study,neglect the guest who is St. Thomas says: “iy no attention to the source ‘ within you. To suppose ihat you will make greatçr of a lesson, but memorize any useful advice yau.. progress in this way orproduce more would be th. may hear.” This does not mean that we should not ( smeas to suppose that the brook would flow better choose our teachers as well as possible, but it does 12 who if the so” were dammed.” St. Jerome, gave mean that, with our small capacity for judgiflg the (7Qis the-Latin--Vulgate edition of the Bible, is said to 1 good_and_the poor teachers, we should attend to lj hve.prepared himself for study by long hours o4 what they say rather than to the way they say it. It sprayer and meditatim. Then, when he was fatigued is difficult for thetudentif the acher is one who - \bystudyThe-woulcL-return-to his meditathm&and _çloes not inspire confidence. The student, who of 0’ Ifrom4hemobt1 ent inul renewed energy course does not p9ssess the knowledge, must at first go hack to his work. St. Thomas indicates in manZ accept the words of the teacher. Thus it is natural - pIacesis own epen ence on e spirztua 1 e. Her 0p for a student to learn better from one whom ha said pnce_thaLheJearned-more before the crucifix c mires and respects, than from onejn whom he has - than 1e..d1diu all the books he read. These are thea r$w’’s less confidence. However. if the student makes 1iIs. goodand holy men PP the student is• advised-. to fol hkonly criterion, he will miss many opportunities low. Father Sertillanges advises the student to start fnr knowledge. For it happens, at times, that a every day by attendance at holy Mass if it is at all teacher who is unprepossessing in appearance and possible. In this way he places himself in the pres- manner will have an abundant store of wisdom. ence of the source of all truth and by so doing is Therefore the prudent man will learn to evaluate, - enabled, with the help of grace, to tLi the par as much as possible. what the teachersays, nQtwhat. ticular truths which he is seeking. Further than this, _he is. Often cljssgtjcfaefjpn with a teacher aris, as was said before, such a life makes one more apt from a failure to understand the process of]çirn for knowledge by purifying the mind and inhibiting ing. Teaching involves an active partipatipn on the passions which make study difficult. thepart ot the shirlent, so thai- the tewherisanjn strument by which the student. applyingjLmseff Ibid., p. 43. tq. the material presented, actuallyJc1trns. Eliii óEikDe ma,Ltro, St. Thomas further
c ;:s’ 4Lf0 4axMr2?? ST. THOMAS ON STUDY 30 THOMIST1C PRINCIPLES askiig_qiestions tq_piake considers the role of the teacher in the learning ne. He is repeatedly Here he says that while no man can teac sure that the meaning hegive t_QhLw_PfclLi_tle. - process.13 many in teinhing, the teacher can only pte as that of the teacjic, Today sdea himsef,still, andisjzjg;. in. senLsigiic that indicate the process. ofieasoning,and ,/are..-accustomerl tomuch.xcading fact, too much. No mind. especialiy.pne_thatis_un itis necessary for the student himself togo through_ _4j trained, can be expected to digest such a mass the same_process of reasoning if he is to acquire,1 material. As a result the student rather expects thaj Thus it is by the immanent activiy of - knQwlecIge. he reads and hears will be unintjjj:_ the student’s mind that he acquires any knQwiedge.. much of what He feels he must cover a certain amount of Tjiis_considcration should destroy any ilhision that.j gible. some of this is not clear to chiclent might have about learning..He_cannot material. The fact that him, while this may cause some misgivings at flr.st, ..sit in..a cia s.paccivcly and tn acquireknowl1 is soon accepted as the normal thingJt would be - edge. His. nthaust be,active at all times, attempt far better for such a_stuilcnLto_spend this timejn. \ fpg to follow the reasoning indiiediiyihe...teachexL. recreation. He is learning nothing; rather_he istc The Understanding of What Is Read and Heard quiring vicious habits of study. The mind is para-. Jyzed instead of being nourished. Little by littJ iL.. The next rule of St. Thomas Is one of great im of reflection and concentratioa_ the student. He says: “Be sure that you becomes incapable 32 ortance to it becomes exter_ Knowledge in ai&consequently of production; nalized, in a way, and enslaved to mental images. science progresses in an orderly way from prem y Ideas are presented iss to conclusions. Each conclusion depends upçn.. r so that even a genius, workig with such ma th previous one as an effect on a cause. If_at .any term I r’nnhl not evfrartJcnow1edg&or frnm... time the student fails to understand.1he..rneaning or jtWhat chance, then, has the poor student?”First farce of a conclusion, all that follows will bei]elcl things first” is a maxim that is applicable to the only as opinion. We often characterize the good stu quisition of knowledge. The student should aIway dent, by øying that he has an inquiring mind. By place quality before quantity. Even if, at first, he - we mean that he refuses to go pn to a ew idea this thus spend days, even weeks, on_one..book, still certai thaLlieuncWstands flprYicli.is.. will untiLhe_is he should follow this rule. AftellJpir- 15 Mary Helen Mayer, The Philosophy of Teaching of St. Thomas e of reading or listening is to understand. (Milwaukee; Bruce, 1929), pp. 89 if.
n 0 ______a C ST. THOMAS ON STUDY 33 32 THOMISTIC PRINCIPLES for storing knowledge by means of books St Thomas says: ‘Never. facilities Along with the last rule notes that the place of memory is not as im fits in quite well with and leave a flnlIbt nnsn1vetL This was. They would do well to read In a chain of rea portant as it once what has been said about study. exact words: “Take pains to certainty of the. carefully St. Thomas’ the - soning, one dnnht may destroy up nii can in the storehouse oTemor,r, student is to have lai you Conclusion which is needed if the would fill a vase.”,There are profound to knowledge. the he does who science or knowledge. As opposed in this statement.cI &]iiZ’1ie, he who states: can be insights mind can be in one of three that modern mechanical aids such as nótes.. know nothing of the par-. thinks in ignorince which i to systems, and the like, can take the place of be in error, which filing ticular science secondly it can does not adequately understand the pi istle;J3nd memory is to assert astruHifvhfch of memory in the pros of thinking. He5hould is tobe uncertain about pose it ean he in rloiihf-, which fact that man, the lowest intellectual of a failure to consider the the truth of a conclusion, because must reason from premises to conclusions. see the cogency oL creature, the premises or to who ctn at a glance. see -. understand To allow Man is not ike the angels the reasoning that results In the conclusion. am1 au the conclusions of an entire the mind the principles doubts to remain unsolved is to burden angels have no need of memory mind is search selence. ThuswhuIe with probable knowled whritlt in the process of thought. man cannot think without is is a ertile source oTfli\ in for certain tru it. He must, at this instant, remember what he has.,. is continually impressed’\ raHon for t Thc olar. He considered in the past. In this way he must, as best knowledge and it often by the probability of his he can, build up his knowledge of a science. Then, to follow any chain of that he is unable when a new conclusion in that science is presented happens conclusion. He lacks con 5pc- reasoning to a certain for his coideration. he must attempt to consider to reason. Thus we see why it is fidence in his ability ( it in the light of what he knows of the whole sci make every effort to) so necessary that the student ence, by the use of his memory. Thus a poor memory his mind of doubts. is one of the accidental causes of error. In the con sideration of a new conclusion, we fail to remember The Place of Memory in the Life of Study all that we have learned about other conclusions iii. will think that the next Perhaps many students science. Obviously notes will not enable us to. should be disregarded. that 157 advice given by St. Thomas sufflcienty all the knowledge we have of a have such excellent review ci’ They would say that now we ___
ST. THOMAS ON STUDY 35 34 THOMISTIC PRINCIPLES should freque.tlythiijk about them in the order science. Therefore we must train ourselves to re flxd upou;iinzthl, hou1dxecfltbem from-the member. beg ig Qjjhe order_flxQ&upon. In the Summa. IQainin the memory there are four rules toh. theologica 14 he mentions the first rule which we cj1ered iP tliingc In hP mAmflri7&l chn!lfl hQ gave. Of those things which (man) wishes to - vivid by attaching to them some striking ifln nacIe remembër1i should take some customary ill!asfra for in this way the mind will more readily tration. tifrns. still won This is particularly true where ah recail the idea. der more at thoce things which are unaccutod; stractions are concerneç dij’ things to he, anti t-lins the coni is more sfrogjydvehementFy menlori7Prl chonid he well ordntl mind. With lwltihy these; thic is the reason we remember bet intelligible things this is riot so difficult becauseall I-’ the things which we saw in childhood.M pf contain an intrinsic order which willj ter them er. the invention of such similitudes or images is v 1v manifest if the things are understood. When ideas nereccary because the simple and spiritual inten fl1L have an orderly arrangement in the mind. reference tions easily sup from the soul unless they are tied aS.. one will recall those connected with it in that o to it_were. to certain bodily similitudes; becanse hu der it—is necesssry that- theinind consider is1a ian knowle1ge is moje eIlIcajious abut ensihie.... thigc; whent’i memory is also placed in the sensF.. i11Iar with the._pçsistençe of th2e experiences tivepart (of the souj which were qigreat concern. These leave a deeper is, “. . .______on the mind and are less likely to be lost. The latter part of this advice impss fill a vase.” Now when ayerson fills a vase, it ic iieces’wiry tç. reflect often i the things _would he chooses the flowers carefully so that they yfll wish to remember. Thus they are periodically we a beautiful appearance. Beauty depmds oi brought before the present 1 order. Thus of all the flowers avjibJe UJ.,e - Or’ Ii uijron AristoilesJ2&mmnoria Ct reminisceiitia “So, from all that has bein_sakL rejected because of this _particular arrangement (1ect...5),say which is intended. This is also true of rnemojy. Do above w can gaefour hints that will help us tç \ tk4lrcf but rather - cyil. memorize and remembrthingsFita niaahmild.. \ not waste time memorizing_useless_iings, carefully what you would retain. Many take care to put what he wishes to remember into. \ choose things are not worth remembering, while others it some he should thoroug4yn&2L \ fixed purpose ..seLhisjpznd on them; e \ ‘4UaIIae,q.49,a.I,ad2. o -i?€ cv’. ‘i e4 ee+
peVed0n1 C9oCIZ€l 0 C) C 0 36 THOMISTIC PRINCIPLES ST. THOMAS ON STUDY 37 pdless-to--aeniezñber because notes and the lç plication of the human mind give a breadth of vision’ will answer the purpose, as wçll. A we11-disc’iplined. which, if the, mind is not sufficiently aware of its mind should be able to forget as well as remembei1, limitations, may lead to attempts which are as futile as they are blasphemous. God in His wisdom has re-,, The Dangers of the Intellectual Life vealed certain truths to man. These we accept on— The last precept of St. Thomas, “Do not try to faith and attempt. by the application of human wis-. know things that are above you” is taken from the dom. to get as much as we can from them. This is i1InJhe iiik of E’lesiactfriic (22—26), we. as Coiwishes.But the conclusions reached by such find “Seek not the things that are too high for thee._ a process necessarily end with mystery. The mind and search notinto.thlngshQve thy abiltty but th dislikes a mysteryJtis-a-challenge to. be accepted, things that God-hath commanded the_thinkirn. a secret or problem to be solved. Being conscioiis them always, and in many of His works be not curb of its power in another order, it desires to find a solu oii For it is not necessary for thee to see with tljy tion of this problem as it does of any other. Here is eyes_those 1-hings that are hid. In unnecessary mat where discipline is necessary, We must at all times ters be not over curious, and in many of His works, realize that what we are considering Is for us un thou shalt not be inquisitive. For many things are knowable, even though it is in itself supremely shown to thee above the understanding of men. And_ knowable. It is Divinity itself, which can be com the suspicion of them hath deceived many. and hath prehended only by God. In this respect St. Augus det’inpd their minds in vanity.” Here in this latter tine once said, “If you understand, tell yourself that passage the meaning of the admonition is more obvi it is not true.” ous. We are not warned against searching for knowl-. On this point Father Sertillanges says that a, C edge absolutely. but rather knowledge of certain superior character realizes that our insights are noth tjiings; namely, those that surpass human under ing more than degrees of shadow by whichwe use
s.tanclipg. In the history of though.Uuiereiiave been toward the inaccessible Clarity!, We c.anonly.stam- - lilcc’ Ahthrd who would use the puny mind. mer, and the enigma of the world is perfect. By of man to unlock the ecrets.ofthe.inAniteAtis un. study we can define a few conditions, classify a few necessary to say that they failed. However, this al facts; real study consists in placing this little under wyc remains one of the serious iemptations.of th& the guidance of what we still do not know. This does intellectual, The reaches attainable by careful ap “Op. cit., pp. 153 f. 38 THOMISTIC PRINCIPLES not mean that they are placed in obscurity, for the light which is not seen is the one that best retains the reflections of our ni . n all thin s the in e e t o e krown •ust as uni e y.Y SQlIr1e of rnimher,asimmobflity_is_thesecret of-mo tThus the true student will feel that mystery is III us t. T omas himself tells us how we are to RELIGION AND THE RESEARCH OF learn. This brief commentary does not exhaust the FIRST PRINCIPLES full teaching of the saint. But at least it guides the student along the right path and may help hhn to wwwww make his hours of study more fruitful. I would add IT is proposed In this chapter to show the necessity one maxim for the student: Always be guided by the of religion in the research of first principles. There wisdom of St. Thomas. fore at the outset we explain in what sense we use the terms “religion” and “first principles.” Definitions Whatever definitions may be given, and rightly given, of religion in other respects do not interest us here, for in relation to the study of first principles we limit the scope of religion to two things. Looked at jom j1e point of view of God, for us religion means. revelation: from the point of view of the student I-i’ c engaged in the research of first principles, it means faith and all that follows from this viri-n in way—. of disposing the mind to the study, love, and proper. application of the primary truths of revelation to
i1es mean the tlit the
0 0 C C C
COPYRIGHT 1953 Truth HENRY REGNERY COMPANY CHICAGO, ILLINOiS
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOG CARD NUM1IER 52—12511 St. Thomas Aquinas
Translated from the definitive Leonine text Imprimi potest by James V. Mc Glynn, S.J. Very Rev. Joseph M. Egan, S.J, West Baden College Proepositus Provir1cicilis Provi’nciqe Chicagiensis 15 January 1952
Nihil obstat Rev. Robert J. Wilimes, S.J. Censor deputatus 21 January 1952 VOLUME II Imprimatur X-XX QUESTIONS + Samuel Cardinal Stritch Archiepiscoptis Chicagkrisis 23 January 5952
HENRY REGNERY COMPANY
CHICAGO 1953
Typography and jacket design by Joseph Trautwein Manufactw’ed in the United States of Ilmerica QUESTION ELEVEN
The Teacher
ARTICLE I
The Question Treats of the Teacher, and in the First Article We Ask: CAN A MAN OR ONLY GOD TEACH AND BE CALLED TEACHER?
Difficulties: It seems that only God teaches and should be called a teacher, for i. In St. Macchew (23:8) we read: “One is your master”; and just before that: “Be not you called Rabbi.” On this passage the Gloss comments: “Lest you give divine honor to men, or usurp for your selves what belongs to God.” Therefore, it seems that only God is a teacher, or teaches. 2. If a man teaches, he does so only through certain signs. For, even if one seems to teach by means of things, as, when aslced what walk ing is, he walks, this is not sufficient to teach the one who asks, unless some sign be added, as Augustine proves.2 He does this by showing that there are many factors involved in the same action; hence, one will not know to what factor the demonstration was due, whether to the substance of the action or to some accident of it. Furthermore, one cannot come to a knowledge of things through a sign, for the knowledge of things is more excellent than the knowledge of signs, since the knowledge of signs is directed to knowledge of things as a means to an end. But the effect is not more excellent than its cause.
im, 1; Parallel readings: 11 Sent., , z, ad ; 8, 5, ad 3; C. G., II, 75; S. T., I, De nnit. inteIl., 5, an. 50—5 1. ‘76 77 Q :fl Truth QUESTION ELEVEN: ARTICLE N Truth Q1JEs’lLON ElEVEN: ARTICLE I teaches the truth enlightens the mind, for truth is the light t Lile mind. Therefore, no one can impart knowledge of anything to another, and a If, therefore, man does teach, he enlightens the mind. But this is false so cannot teach him. for in the Gospel according to St. John (1:9) we see that it is God If signs of certain things are proposed to someone by a man, the . who “enlighteneth every man that cometh into this world.” either knows the things which the There one to whom they are proposed fore, one man cannot really teach another. signs represent or he does not. If he knows the things, he is not taught 10. If one roan teaches another, lie roust make a potential lcnowej them. But if he does not know them, he cannot know the meanings of into an actual knower. Therefore, his knowledge must be raised from not know the things. For a man who does not the signs, since he does potency to act. But what is raised from potency to actuality must be cannot know what the word stone means. But know what a stone is changed. Therefore, knowledge or wisdom will be changed. How meaning of the terms, he cannot learn any if he does not know the ever, this is contrary to Augustine, who says: “In coming to a man, Therefore, if a man does nothing else to teach thing through the signs. wisdom is not itself changed, but changes the man.”6 that one man cannot be taught by an than propose signs, it seems Knowledge is nothing else hut the representation of things in other. the soul, since knowledge is called the assimilation of the knower to To teach is nothing else than to cause knowledge in another in . the thing known. But one man cannot imprint the likeness of things is the subject of knowledge. Now, some way. But our understanding in the soul of another. For, thus, he would work interiorly in that man, it would seem, man can be taught, do sensible signs, by which alone, which God alone can do. Therefore, one man cannot teach another. intellective part, but affect the senses only. Therefore, not reach the 32. Boethius says1 that teaching does no more than stimulate the man cannot be taught by a roan. mind to lcnow. But he who stimulates the understanding to know does If the knowledge is caused by one person in another, the learner . not make it know, just as one who incites someone to see with the eyes If he did not have it already and either had it already or he did not. of the body does not make him see. Therefore, one man does not make then one man creates knowledge in it was caused in him by another, another know. And so it cannot properly be said that he teaches him. However, if he had it already, it was another, which is impossible. 53. There is no scientific knowledge without certitude. Otherwise, and thus it cannot be caused, for present either in complete actuality, it is not scientific knowledge but opinion or belief, as Augustine says.8 being, or it was present semi what already exists does not come into But one man cannot produce certitude in another by means of the such seminal principles can nally (secundum rationes seminoles). But sensible signs which he proposes. For that which is in the sense faculty but are implanted in nature not be actualized by any created power, is less direct than that which is in the understanding, while certainty remains true that one man by God alone, as Augustine says.3 So, it is always effected by the more direct. Therefore, one man cannot can in no way teach another. teach another. But an accident does not change the 6. Knowledge is an accident. 14. The intelligible light and a species are all that are needed for since teaching seems to be subject in which it inheres. Therefore, knowledge. But neither of these can be caused in one man by an from teacher to pupil, one nothing else but the transfer of knowledge other. For it would be necessary for a man to create something, since cannot teach another. it seems that simple forms like these can be produced only by crea then cometh by hearing,” 7. The Gloss, on Romans (io: 37), “Faith tion. Therefore, one man cannot cause knowledge in another and, so, the preacher proclaims says: “Although God teaches man interiorly, cannot teach. knowledge is caused interiorly in the mind, not it exteriorly.”4 But 15. As Augustine says,5 nothing except God alone can give the mind Therefore, man is taught only by God, not exteriorly in the senses. of man its form. But knowledge is a form of the mind. Therefore, only by another man. God can cause knowledge in the soul. teaches truth on earth, holds 8. Augustine says: “God alone, who i6. just as guilt is in the mind, so is ignorance. But only God cleanses teacher’s chair in heaven, but to this chair another man has the the the mind of guilt, according to Isaias ( :25): “1 urn he that blots out has to a tree.”5 But the farmer does not make relation which a farmer thy iniquities for my own sake.” Therefore, God alone cleanses the it. And by the same token no man can he said the tree; he cultivates mind of ignorance. And, so, only God teaches. only prepare the mind for it. to teach knowledge, but 57. Since science is certain knowledge, one receives science from If roan is a real teacher, he must teach the truth. But whoever . 79 78 Truth • QUESTION ELEVEN: ARTICLE I I Truth • QUESTION ELEVEN: ARTICLE sin, but after its coming it needs the teaching of others as rain coming However, hearing a man speak him whose words give him certainty. down from the clouds. Therefore, at least since sin came into the anything that one person does not give anyone certainty. Otherwise, world, man is taught by man. one reaches says to another would of necessity be clearly certain. Now, within him. And to be certitude only when he hears the truth speaking REPLY: interior voice even about those certain, he takes counsel with this There is the same sort of difference of opinion on three issues: on men. Therefore, not man but the truth things which he hears from the bringing of forms into existence, on the acquiring of virtues, and speaking within, which is God, teaches. on the acquiring of scientific knowledge. words of another those things, which, i 8. No one learns through the For some’4 have said that all sensible forms come from an external before the other spoke. But if asked, he would have answered, even agent, a separated substance or form, which they call the giver of upon being questioned, even before the teacher speaks, the pupil, forms or agent intelligence, and that all that lower natural agents do the teacher proposes. For he would answer about the matters which is prepare the matter to receive the form. Similarly, Avicenna says’5 only in so far as he knew would be taught by the words of the teacher that our activity is not the cause of a good habit, but only keeps out its Therefore, one man is that matters were such as the teacher claimed. opposite and prepares us for the habit so that it may come from the not taught by the words of another. substance which perfects the souls of men. This is the agent intelli gence or some similar substance. They also hold that knowledge is caused in us only by an agent free To the Contrary: of matter. For this reason Avicenna holds” that the intelligible forms (i:ii) we read: “Wherein I i’. In the second Epistle to Timothy flow into our mind from the agent intelligence. . of the gentiles.” Therefore, am appointed a preacher . . and teacher Some17 have held the opposite opinion, namely, that all three of man can be a teacher and can be called one. those are embodied in things and have no external cause, but are only (3: 34) it is said: “But continue 2’. In the second Epistle to Timothy brought to light by external activity. For some have held that all and which have been thou in those things which thou has learned, natural forms are in act, lying hidden in matter, and that a natural “From me as from a true committed to thee.” Of this the Gloss says: agent does nothing but draw tliem from concealment out into the teacher.”1° We conclude as before. open. In like manner, some’s hold that all the habits of the virtues are “One is your Father” In one place in Matthew (23:8, ) we find: implanted in us by nature. And the practice of their actions removes ‘. our Father does not and “One is your master.” But the fact that God is the obstructions which, as it were, hid these habits, just as rust is re Likewise, the make it impossible for man truly to be called father. moved by filing so that the brightness of the iron is brought to light. for man truly fact that God is our teacher does not make it impossible Similarly, some1° also have said that the lcnowledge of all things is to be called teacher. con-created with the soul and that through teaching and the external over the moun The Gloss on Rornans (io: ii), “How beautiful helps of this type of knowledge all that happens is that the soul is ‘. enlighten the Church.” ,“ are the feet who tains . . . reads: “They prompted to recall or consider those things which it knew previously. to enlighten is Now, it is speaking about the Apostles. Since, then, Hence, they say that learning is nothing but remembering. to teach. the act of a teacher, it seems that men are competent But both of these positions lack a reasonable basis. For the first opin perfect when it can As is said in the Meteorology ,‘ each thing is ion excludes proximate causes, attributing solely to first causes all ef ‘. kind of perfect generate things like itself. But scientific knowledge is a fects which happen in lower natures. In this it derogates from the order can teach knowledge. Therefore, a man who has scientific lcnowledge of the universe, which is made up of the order and connection of another. causes, since the first cause, by the pre-eminence of its goodness, gives by a fountain 6’. Augustine says13 that just as the earth was watered other beings not only their existence, but also their existence as causes. rain from the before the coming of sin, and after its coming needed The second position, too, falls into practically the same difficulty. For, represented by the clouds above, so also the human mind, which is since a thing which removes an obstruction is a mover only accident the coming of earth, was made fruitful by the fountain of truth before 8i 8o 0 Truth • QUESTION ELEVEN: ARTICLE I I (- QUESTION ELEVEN: ARTLCLE ruth • cause of the transition from potency to act. Thus, fire nalc&. tual lower agents do nothing but bring ally, as is said in the Physics,20 if tire of air, which is potentially fire. taking away the obstructions things from concealment into the open, Knowledge, therefore, pre-exists in the learner potentially, not, of the virtues and the sciences, active, sense, which concealed the forms and habits however, in the purely passive, but in the Otherwise, agents act only accidentally. man would not be able to acquire knowledge independently. There it follows that all lower posi been said we ought to hold a middle as there are two ways of being cured, that is, either through the Therefore, in all that has For fore, to the teaching of Aristotle.2t of unaided nature or by nature with the aid of medicine, so t.ion between these two, according but activity matter not actually, as some have said, are two ways of acquiring knowledge. In one way, natural natural forms pre_exist in po also there to actuality from this state of of unknown things, and this way only in potency. They are brought reason by itself reaches knowledge and not through the first someone else aids the learn through a proximate external agent, is called discovery; in the other way, when tency Similarly, according to as one of the opinions maintains. er’s natural reason, and this is called learning by instruction. agent alone, virtue are completely Aristotle,22 before the habits of In effects which are produced by nature and by art, art operates in this opinion of which are the in certain natural inclinations, the same way and through the same means as nature. For, as nature formed, they exist in us their afterwards, through practice in is from cold by warming him, so also does the beginnings of the virtues. But heals one who suffering to their proper completion. doctor. Hence, art is said to imitate nature. A similar thing takes place actions, they are brought knowl explanation of the acquisition of knowledge. For the teacher leads the pupil to knowledge W’e must give a similar first in acquiring pre-exist in us, namely, the not know in the same way that one directs himself edge. For certain seeds of lcnowledge of things he does by the light of the agent intellect of discovering something he does not know. concepts of understanding, which through the process the species abstracted from sensible the procedure of anyone who arrives at the are immediately known through Now, in discovery, axioms, or simple, as the notions is to apply general self-evident These are either complex, as knowledge of something unknown things. understanding grasps im to proceed to par the one, and so on, which the principles to certain definite matters, from these of being, of the consequences general principles, however, all ticular conclusions, and from these to others. Consequently, one per mediately. In these therefore, the certain seminal principles. vVhen, son is said to teach another inasmuch as, by signs, he manifests to that are included as in of the par notions to actual knowledge the reasoning process which he himself goes through by his own mind is led from these general were, other previously in general and, as it And thus, through the instrumentality, as it were, of ticular things, which it knew natural reason. is said to acquire knowledge. what is told him, the natural reason of the pupil arrives at a knowledge potentially, then one something nevertheless, that in natural things of the things which he did not know. Therefore, just as the doctor is V/e must bear in mind, active and in two ways. In one, it is in an said to heal a patient through the activity of nature, so a man is said can pre-exist in potency power an intrinsic principle has sufficient to in another through the activity of the learner’s completed potency, as when the cause knowledge is an obvious example of this, for and this is teaching. So, one is said to teach an to flow into perfect act. Healing own natural reason, by the natural power within him. This is what the Philosopher means when sick person is restored to health other and be his teacher. potency, as happens when the internal is a syllogism which makes someone lcnow.”23 The other appears in a passive is he says: “Demonstration power to bring it into act. This to another things which are not included principle does not have sufficient But, if someone proposes cannot result from any power does not make it clear that they are in when air becomes fire, for this in self-evident principles, or clear in the other but, perhaps, opinion existing in the air. cluded, he will not cause knowledge in active completed potency, is in some way caused by inborn first prin Therefore, when something pre-exists or faith, although even this the internal agent and provid principles he realizes that what. the external agent acts only by helping ciples, for from these self-evident can enter into act. Thus, in healing them is to be held with certitude, and that ing it with the means by which it necessarily follows from the principal agent, by strengthen is to be rejected completely, and that assent the doctor assists nature, which is what is contrary to them medicines, which nature uses as instruments to or withheld from whatever neither follows neces ing nature and prescribing in may be given when something pre-exists only to principles. Now, the light for healing. On the other hand, sarily from nor is contrary self-evident external agent which is the principal passive potency, then it is the 83 8z ARTICLE I Truth • QUESTION Truth QUESTION ELEVEN: ELEVEN: ARTICLE I are evident to us is implanted in actuality, but, as it were, in seminal principles, in the sense of reason by which such principles that the in us of the uncreated truth. universal concepts which we know naturally are, as it were, the us by God as a kind of reflected likeness seeds only in virtue of that of all the knowledge which follows. But, although these So, since all human teaching can be effective Seminal prin interiorly and principally, ciples are not developed to actuality by any created power, as light, it is obvious that God alone teaches though principally. Nevertheless, both they were infused by a created power, that which they have in a primi. just as nature alone heals interiorly and in a proper sense in the way we tive way and virtually can develop into actuality by means of the to heal and to teach can still be used activity of a created power. have explained. 6. We do not say that a teacher communicates knowledge to the pupil, as though the knowledge which is in the teacher is numerically the same as that which arises in tile pupil, it is rather that the knowl_ Answers to Difficulties: disciples not to be called teachers, edge which arises in the pupil through teaching is similar to that which i.Since our Lord had ordered the is to be understood, lest it be is in the teacher, and this was raised from potency into act, as has been the Gloss24 explains how this prohibition to call man a teacher in this said.* taken absolutely. For we are forbidden pre-eminence of teaching, which As the doctor is said to cause healing, although he works exter sense, that we attribute to him the 7. put our hope in the wisdom of iorly, while nature alone works interiorly, so man is said to teach the belongs to God. It would be as if we truth about those things which truth, although he declares it exteriorly, while God teaches interiorly. men, and did not rather consult divine truth speaks in us through the im 8. When Augustine proves that only God teaches, he does not in we hear from man. And this divine of which we can judge of all things. tend to exclude man from teaching exteriorly, but intends to say that pression of its likeness, by means not produced in us through knowledge God alone teaches interiorly. 2. Knowledge of things is things more certain, namely, prin Man can truly be called a true teacher inasmuch as he teaches tile of signs, but through lcnowledge of 9. us through signs and are applied to truth and enlightens the mind. This does not mean, however, that he ciples. The latter are proposed to unlcnown to us simply, although endows the mind with light, but that, as it were, he co-operates with other things which were heretofore as has been said.* For knowl the light of reason by supplying external help to itto reach the perfec they were known to us in some respect, knowledge of conclusions; knowl tion of knowledge. This is in accordance with Ephesians (3:8—9): “To edge of principles produces in us me, the least of all the saints, is given this grace . . . to enlighten all edge of signs does not. we are taught through signs, men,.. To some extent we lcnow the things 3. them. Thus, if we are taught what 10. Wisdom is twofold, created and uncreated. Man is said to be and to some extent we do not know about him beforehand, namely, the endowed with both and to improve himself by advancing in them. man is, we must know something or at least of being itself, which Uncreated wisdom, however, cannot be changed in any way, whereas meaning of animal, or of substance, Similarly, if we are taught a certain in us created wisdom can be changed for some extrinsic reason, though last concept cannot escape us. what tile subject and predicate not by reason of anything intrinsic to it. We can consider this capac conclusion, we must know beforehand of the principles through ity for change in two ways. In one way, according to the relation are. We must also have previous knowledge “all teaching comes from pre_exist which it has to eternal things, and in this way it is entirely nnchange- which the conclusion is taught, for Analytics.25 Hence, the able. In the other, according to the existence which it has in the subject, ing knowledge,” as is said in the Posterior It is changed for some extrinsic reason when tile subject which has argument does not follow. from sensible signs Wisdom in potency is changed into a subject having it in act. For the Our intellect derives intelligible likenesses 4. and it uses these intelligible intelligible forms in which wisdom consists are both likenesses of which are received in the sensitive faculty, knowledge. For the signs are not things and forms perfecting the understanding. forms to produce in itself scientific but reason is, in its passage II. In the pupil, the intelligible forms of which knowledge received the proximate efficient cause of knowledge, been said.* through teaching is constituted arc caused directly by the agent intel from principles to conclusions, as has the knowledge did not exist in complete lect and mediately by the one who teaches. For the teacher sets be- 5. In one who is taught, 8.j. 85 C QUEST10 ELEVEN: A1erIcLI; 2 ARTICLE I Truth QUESTION ELEVEN: } agent tific knowledge from this unless there were within us the certainty of things, and from these the fore the pupil signs of intelligible to exist in the principles to which the conclusions are reduced, likenesses and causes them intellect derives the intelligible or seen 14. Man, teaching from without, does not infuse the intelligible words of the teacher, heard intellect. Hence, the things light, but he is in a certain sense a cause of the intelligible species, in the possible in causing knowledge as have the same efficacy so far as he offers us certain signs of intelligible hlcenesses, which our in writing, the agent intellect receives the soul. For from both understanding receives from those signs and keeps within itself. which are outside of the teacher are more although the words i. When it is said that nothing’ but God can form the mind, this is intelligible likenesses, outside the soul, cause knowledge than things mind would be consid proximately disposed to understood of its basic form, without which intelligible forms. it had. is the form by so far as they are signs of is not ered formless, no matter what other forms This in are not alike, for bodily sight Intellectual and bodily sight from which it turns toward the Word and clings to Him. It is through this its objects it can proceed 27 compares, so that among alone that rational nature is called formed, as is clear from Augustine a power which this sight can be seen as soon Rather, all the objects of m6. Guilt is in the affections, on which only God can make an im one to another. has the power of sight anyone who as will appear later.28 But ignorance is in the understanding, as it turns to them. Consequently, of knowledge pression, as one who has a habit an For the look at all visible things, just There on which even a created power can make imprint. agent can which he knows habitually. attention to the things intellect impresses the intelligible species on the possible intellect, and can turn his from another to see some subject needs no stimulus through the mediation of this latter, scientific knowledge is caused fore, the seeing the subject’s attention to perhaps, someone else directs in our soul by sensible things and by the teaching of man, as has been thing, unless, something of the sort. by pointing it out or doing said.* some object compare, it proceeds from intellective power can 17. One has the certainty of scientific knowledge, as has been said,20 But, since the have the same relation to As a result, it does not from God alone, who has given us the light of reason, through which some things to others. the mind sees certain of consideration. Rather, we know principles. It is from these that the certainty of scientific all intelligible objects in which are con those which are self-evident, knowledge arises. Nevertheless, scientific lcnowledge can in a certain things immediately, understand only by using rea other things which it can sense be caused in us by man, as has been saicl.* tained certain implicitly contained in prin those things which are i8. Before the teacher speaks, the pupil would, if asked, answer son to unfold is not only in accidental the mind has the habit, it about the principles through which he is taught, but not about the ciples. Thus, before potency. For the things, but also essential someone is teaching him. Hence, he does not learn potency to know these is said in the conclusions which it through teaching, as only the needs a mover to actualize would the principles from the teacher, but conclusions. mind knew something habitually But a man who already intellect Physics.25 teacher furnishes the pupil’s need this. Therefore, the as an TBoethius, De consolatjoize philoso not things which he teaches, irnerlftzraris, super Matt. 23:8 to knowledge of the 1Qlossa phiae, V, prosa 5 (PL 63:854). with a stimulus potentiality to ac (V:711). bringing the intellect from 3St. Augustine, Do nrngistro, XII (FL indispensable mover, prompts it to 2St. Augustine, De Vlagistro, III (FL thing to bodily sight 3Z 12 i6). who shows some 32:1198); X (PL 32:1214-15). tuality. But one has the habit of knowl °Sc. Augustine, Do libe’ro arbitria, H, mover. And one who 3St. Augustine, De genesi ad litteram, action as a nonessential to consider 17 (FL 32:1265). stimulus from someone VII, (FL 34367). in this way receive a 10Glossa interlinearly, super 2 Tim. sedge can ordinaria, super Rom. 10:17 “Glossa 3:14 (VI:iaóv); see also Col/ectanea something. arises from the cer (VI: 247). of scientific knowledge Lombardi, ibid. (FL 192:377), 13. The whole certainty when 5Sr. Augustine, De disciplinci christinna, are known with certainty 11Glossa ordinarja and Glos’, inter principles. For conclusions XIV (FL 40:678); IX (FL 40:674). tainty of something is known linearly, super Rom. io:j (VI:z3y). Therefore, that De magistro, XII (FL 32:1216- they are reduced to the principles. within Cf. The quotation from Scripture is not reason divinely implanted (PL 32:1219-20). is due to the light of 17);XJV exactly the same as our Vulgate, with certainty from man, teaching from Octog. tri’u’m qua est., speaks within us. It comes 5Sc. Augustine, which has nothing corresponding to us, by which God to the (FL4o:38), teaching us, he reduces conclusions LIV “over the mountains.” without, only in so far as, of scien we would not attain the certainty principles. Nevertheless, 87 86 ARTICLE 12Aristotle, Meteorologicct, IV, (38a iOlbjd. Truth ‘ QUESTION ELEVEN: 4 (io49b 14) 2oAristotle, Physica, VIII, (a56a 4 if., 14) cf also iWetapb., 0, 8 if.). who have no bodies, teach, as has been said.2 Therefore, it seems that llSt. Augustine, De genesi contra z56b lIbid., 1, 8 (igth 10 if). to the contemplative life. Manicl,aeos, II, (FL 34:198). teaching pertains 2CArjstotje, Ethica Nicornachea, II, i active life in order to arrive l4Alexander, etc.; cf. above, q. 10, a. 8, 2. Gregory says: “One engages in the (IIo3a 24). Cf. ibid., VI, ii (ii43b n, at the contemplative later.”8 But teaching does not precede contem 34. 6), VI, 13 (it44b5). lx, (ioc). does not pertain to the l5Avicenna, Metaph., 7 2lAristotle, Analytica posteriora, 1, 2 plation, hut follows it. Therefore, teaching V, 6 (25r). itiAvicenna, De anima, (7ib i8). active life, the Stoics. On the 17Anaugoras and 24See n. i (above). also says that the active life “sees less while it is engaged Physica, 1, 3. Gregory former, see Aristotle, 2aAristotle, /lnalytica posteriora, I, i must of necessity see more than one latter, see Chal— in work.”4 But one who teaches (i87a ag); on the (via 1). 247). simply contemplates. Therefore, teaching pertains more to the cidius, In Timaeum, (DD 28Aristotle, Physica, VII, 3 (,47b ). who laThis opinion and the following Co. 27St, Augustine, Dc genesi ad litteram, contemplative than to the active life. to Plato. See S. T., 34:292); Octog. triuni which makes each thing perfect in itself 19) are attributed III, 20 (FL 4. It is the same perfection and D. de 1, 48, i; I, 84, 3, obj. ; Q. quaest., V (FL 40:1:1). it give others a perfection like its own. Thus it is by of this and enables to DOt., 8. For an explanation IL, a. 2. and gives , 281n q. reason of one and the same wainith that fire itself is warm the Great, In Jo, a. 6. position see St. Albert 201n q. warmth to other things. But one’s own perfection in meditation on C. (BO VII: 112). Plato Eth., I, tr. , teaching, 8zB; things of God belongs to the contemplative life. Therefore, his position in Memo, gives gzA. this same perfection to another, be Tfrnaens, 41A; Phaedo, 67D; which is the communication of See Cicero, Disp. Tnscsd., 1, 31. longs to the contemplative life. temporal things. But teaching is 5. The active life is occupied with occupied mainly with things eternal, for the teaching of these latter per is more excellent and more perfect. Therefore, teaching does not tain to the active, but to the contemplative life.
To the Contrary: bread to the i’. Gregory says: “The active life consists in giving hungry, and in teaching the ignorant the word of wisdom.”5 life. But teaching is 2’. The works of mercy are part of the active counted among the spiritual works of mercy. Therefore, it is part of the active life. ARTICLE IV RE PLY: AN from each Article We Ask: Is TEACHING The contemplative and the active life are distinguished In the Fourth other by their subject matter and that to which they are ordained. CONTEMPLATIVE OR temporal affairs, with which ACTIVITY OF THE For the subject matter of the active life is human are concerned. But the intelligible natures of things, on LIFE? acts THE ACTIVE which the one contemplating meditates, are the subject matter of the Contemplative life. This diversity of subject matter arises from a di versity of the end to be attained, just as in all other things the require Difficulties: life, for prescribe certain conditions in the an activity of the contemplative ments of the end to be attained It seems to be no body,” as Gregory active life where there is subject matter. i. “There is no for even angels, now where there is no body, For the end toward which the contemplative life, as we are says.’ But there is teaching I lI-H, 181, 3; Contra recTa examining is ordained is the consideration of truth, of that truth, i, sol. r, ad ; S. T,, it, Parallel readings: 111 Sent., 35, , c. ad 7. hentes a religionir ingressu, 7, 99 98 c j n Truth QUESTION ELEVEN: ARTiCLE 4 i’ruth QUESTION ELEVEN: ARTICLE 4 3. The insight of the teacher is a source of teaching, but teaching in the manner possible to the one say, which is uncreated, considered itself consists more in the communication of the things seen than in truth imperfectly in this life, but per— contemplating it. VVe see this the vision of them. Hence, the insight of the teacher belongs more to Gregory says8 that the contempla fectly in the life to come. Hence, action than to contemplation. to be made perfect in the life to come. tive life begins here in order 4. This argument proves that the contemplative life is a source of life is directed is the activity But the end toward which the active teaching just as heat is the source of the act of warming, and is not our neighbor. which is directed to the help of itself that activity. For we see that the contemplative life is the source we find a twofold subject matter, Moreover, in the act of teaching of the active life in so far as im directs it, just as, conversely, the active are used as objects of the as an indication of this, two accusatives life disposes for the .iternplative. and is so because the subject expresses the act of teaching. This The solution is clear from what has been said, for teaching and verb which of teaching, and the . is one kind of subject matter life have the first type of subject matter in com which one teaches of sub the contemplative is communicated is another type one to whom the knowledge per mon, as has been said above. reason of the former, teaching of teaching. Accordingly, by ject of the latter it is part of contemplative life, but by reason tains to the which it is directed, if we consider the end toward the active life, But, its last sub only of the active life, because teaching seems to be a part with the end proposed to it, is a subject ject matter, in which it reaches Therefore, although it is in some which the active life is concerned. life, as is clear from what has sense a function of the contemplative work of the active than of the contem been said, it is more properly a plative life. to Difficulties: Answers body, inasmuch as toil active life where there is no i. There is no the infirmi exercise, and inasmuch as it relieves is connected with its active sense that Gregory says: “The ties of our neighbors. It is in this in the sweat of its brow; two things life is laborious because it works life.”T Nevertheless, there is still hier which will not be in the future spirits, as Dionysius says,8 and activity among the heavenly archical active life which we activity is different from the ‘Sc, Gregory, in Ezech., 1, (FL 76: the manner of the there is far teaching which will exist 809); II, 2 (PL 76:954). now lead in this life, Hence, the 2In Ii, a. . from the teaching here, q. different of our life leads us 3St. Gregory, in Ezech., II, (PL 76: says: “Just as the good disposal 2. As Gregory manner 954). life to the contemplative, in like to try to pass from the active to 1lbid. turn back from the contemplative the minds of many can usefully 5ibid., II, a (FL 76:953), the contemplative life has en life so that the flame which 1bid., II, 2 (FL 76:954), the active active life more per minds may lead them to live the ‘lbid,, II, z (FL 76:954). kindled in their precedes the in mind that the active life De cac/esti fectly.”° Still, we must bear in 8Pseudo-Dionysius, perhaps acts which have a subject matter hierarchia, IV (PG 3:179-82). contemplative in regard to those part at all, but the active life must °St. Gregory, In Ezech,, II, a (P1. 76: which the contemplative life has no which receive their subject mat 954-55). follow the contemplative in those acts contemplative life. ter from the Jo’ I00 AN IGNATIAN PAIDEIA
General Characteristics of Ignatian Paideia
The curriculum of an Ignatian Paideia:
A. stresses formation;
B. is intensive;
C. is humanistic and traditional; and
D. is organized, based on the following principles:
1. an organic philosophy of education, 2. a hierarchy of values, 3. a balance of values, 4. the psychological development of the student, 5. a carefully graded progression, and 6. a methodology based on the mastery formula.
Specific Characteristics of Ignatian Paideia
The two main threads that run through the work of St. Ignatius and the men who brought his Ratio Studiorum to fruition are simplicity and practicality. As you read through this section, which details the general characteristics of Ignatian Paideia, you will begin to perceive and appreciate these threads as they appear again and again.
A. Formation
The Ignatian Paideia stresses formation, not information - the development of intellectual and moral habits, rather than the accumulation of information. Factual knowledge is not unimportant, in fact, it is essential material for formation; but it is a means to achieve the end: formation.
The formative function of education is to develop, discipline, and direct the capacities of human personality. This happens when the mind assimilates, with and through subject matter, definite ideas, attitudes, methods, habits, and ideals. All of the main branches of learning: religion, language, literature, history, math, and science have their own particular disciplines and complex of ideas, attitudes, methods, habits, and ideals.
B. Intensive Study
Stress is placed on intensive study of a relatively small body of subject matter rather than extensive study of a large amount of content. This principle follows from the choice of formation as the objective. The content of the subject fields is vast and the capacities of the students are limited. Hence, if the field of exercise were not restricted, the training would be shallow and superficial. Conversely, too narrow a scope would shut off a broad view of the field and would depress student interest.
Therefore, selection is needed. The principle of selectivity should be the immediate aim of the subject study. Important aspects should be treated intensively while lesser elements are summarized in their proper order to produce a sound perspective of the whole.
C. Humanistic and Traditional
Emphasis is placed on the humanistic and traditional norms, not modernistic nor scientific norms, still less, materialis tic.
The Latin and Greek classics are considered constants because they offer abiding and universal values for human training. Close and inspiring contact with the classics will offer students high human values and standards, will "humanize" them and start them on their way to becoming spiritualized.
D. Organized
The organization, which is neither random or elective, is complex and is based on the following principles:
1. Organic Philosophy of Education
An organic philosophy of education and life takes a unified view of the nature and destiny of man and of his obligations to God, to his fellow man and to himself. This establishes the basis for formation.
2. Hierarchy of Values
Some subjects are more formative than others and contribute more directly to the objectives of the system. This is true partly because of the nature of the subject's content and partly because of the approach to problems, the method, or the comprehensive discipline of the subject.
These formative subjects: religion, languages, literature, history, math and science, should make up the core of the curriculum.
Modern subjects, such as economics, sociology, psychology, sex education, and other similar anti-formational subjects, are to be assiduously purged from any classical system of primary or secondary education.
Thus, in subjects of factual content, the teacher will stress the mental processes which form in the student:
- methods and habits of interrelating and unifying facts, - the seeking of cause and effect, - the derivation of principles, and - the application of principles in the evaluation of facts and in the solution of problems.
3. Balance of Values
Each of the subject fields mentioned above offers something unique in the formative value of its content and in the attitudes and techniques of its particular discipline. Each of these values complements the others and all together are fused into an instrument of formation.
The integrating agent in this fusion is the classroom teacher who teaches several subjects to the same group of students. There is unity in the prescribed curriculum, which does permit electives. There is uniformity and continuity in the methods of teaching, because the teachers themselves have been trained in the same system. And, there is unity of purpose, as all teachers are guided by a philosophy of life that is the same as the philosophy of the school.
4. Psychological Development of The Student
The sequence of courses and of emphasis in a given field is based on the psychological growth of the human capacities:
- When memory is sharpest, emphasis is placed on language and factual knowledge in history, math, and science; - When imagination is unfolding, emphasis is placed on literature and its appreciation and expression; - When reasoning is maturing, emphasis is placed on inductive and deductive reasoning in math, science, and certain forms of literature, and, of course, an introduction to philosophy in high school.
5. Graded Progression
A carefully graded progression toward clearly conceived objectives is one of the goals and standards of each subject field of the curriculum.
Content, methodology, and progression are all means and are planned so that they contribute directly toward achieving the maximum contribution of the subject toward the total and partial aims of the whole curriculum.
6. Methodology Based On The Mastery Formula
The mastery formula consists of:
- the self-activity on the part of the student, - leading to the mastery of progressively more difficult subject matter, and - both self-activity and mastery leading to the formation of intellectual and moral habits.
The characteristic techniques of this methodology are:
a. Personal Interest in the Student: the personal guidance of the student by the classroom teacher. This is the most important characteristic of the Ignatian Paideia. In the ultimate and ulterior aim of Ignatian education, the teacher must be more concerned with the student's soul than with his intellect. The close relationship between the teacher and the student is a means of inspiring the student, of showing high ideals, and of teaching example in both the spiritual and intellectual orders. b. The Prelection: a preview, conducted by the teacher, with the active participation of the student or the class, of every type of assignment. c. Repetition: the organization and synthesis in the student's mind of the knowledge he has thus far acquired through rapid review of the prelections, recitations, or weekly, monthly and annual repetitions. d. Memory Work: filling the storehouse of facts and knowledge, which are the materials for thought. The exercise of memory increases the faculty. e. Emulation: the competition among equals and among groups to stimulate activity and to provide motivation. f. Provision for a Variety of Class Exercises: providing for interesting and stimulating activity. g. Stimulating the Power of Written and Oral Expression: the teacher's careful guidance of the student's efforts, particularly by the painstaking correction of written composition. This is a feature of every stage of development within the Ignatian Paideia, in keeping with the aim of eloquentia perfecta. h. Measuring Achievement by Comprehensive Examinations: the public proof of mastery demanded of students. Accomplishment is measured by demonstrated ability, not by time or by the number of courses taken. The system of promotion is suited to the ability and progress of the individual student. The standard is set forth in the content and objectives of the syllabi and tested by comprehensive examination. Acceleration of the more able and industrious is a regular practice. i. Extra-Curricular Activity: the activities designed to complement and supplement the course of studies. Activities are chosen, not primarily on the basis of the student's interest, but on the suitability to produce the desired spiritual, moral, and intellectual outcomes. The chief extra-curricular activities fall into three classes: writing, speaking and dramatics.
KOLBE ACADEMY HOME SCHOOL
A SYNOPSIS OF THF OBJECTIVES AND METHODS OF
IGNATIAN EDUCATION ______
I. OBJECTIVES OF IGNATIAN EDUCATION
The objectives of Ignatian education as derived from the Constitutions are:
1. A special loyalty to the Holy See; 2. The direction of all the student's efforts and accomplishments toward the supernatural ideal epitomized by the phrase, Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam, or simply AMDG; 3. To prepare leaders in order to become effective agents of Catholic action; 4. An intelligent obedience to all duly constituted authority; 5. A respect for the significant contributions of the past; 6. The production of Christian humanists; 7. To produce in the student the habit of orderly thinking, trained first by the analytic/synthetic method of studying languages and then by study in a literature-based curriculum; and 8. Competency in the arts of expression.
II. BASIC METHODS
1. SELF ACTIVITY: Insistence on self~activity should be directed toward forming in the student the habit of independent study and reading directed toward interest in scholarly pursuits. 2. MAS TER Y: The most effective motivation for the student is the growing sense of mastery that is acquired in completing progressively more difficult material. 3. FORMATION : The final objective is "formation" not "information"! Myriad levels of unre lated information can never stand against the education that "forms" the mind to think, reason, express and convince.
III. PRINCIPLES OF TEACHING IN THE IGNATIAN CONTEXT
The basic methods used to achieve the objectives stated above are as follows:
A. Aim of teaching; B. Teacher / parent / student relationships; C. Student self-activity; D. Training of memory; E. Repetition; F. Active teaching techniques; G. Mastery formula; H. Expres s ion.
Synopsis of Implementation - Page 2
A. AIM OF TEACHING:
1. To impart not only intellectual content but also method; 2. To require the teacher to train the student how to a. grapple, b. explore, and c. grasp significant details; 3. To control the means of testing progressive advancement.
B. TEACHER / PARENT / STUDENT RELATIONS HIP :
1. Prevent: a. discipline from becoming law without influence, b. a system without personality; 2. The informal agencies are more effective than the formal; 3. Student problems should be brought to the attention of the student first with the objec tive of obtaining the cooperation of the student, then as problems persist, the parent must always be brought in; 4. Cooperation, and mutual support between parent and teacher must be a primary objective of administration; 5. Teacher's influence should be a stimulus in forming religious as well as intellectual habits; 6. Through association with staff, the abilities and talents of the student should be fostered and guided toward the vocation God has in mind for the student in order to bring about superior Catholic life.
C. STUDENT SELF-ACTIVITY - Aim of stimulating self-activity:
This is the first, and most important, of the three significant and logically connected elements
1. Self-activity results in co-operative effort between student and teacher; 2. Active methods that foster "masterv" are a. prelection (preview), b. class recitation, and c. repetition; 3. Self-activity forms habits of independent study, reading and scholarly pursuits; 4. Ignatian teaching is an art rather than a science.
D. TRAINING OF MEMORY:
1. Sharpens faculty itself; 2. Basis for oral and spontaneous written expression; 3. Gradually imparts rhythm and style for literary expression; 4. Furnishes other faculties (imagination, intellect) with material on which to work.
Synopsis of Implementation - Page 3
E. REPETITION:
1. Five types of repetition: a. brief review immediately after the prelection, b. thorough testing of home study next day, c. weekly review of class material, d. comprehensive review at the end of the month, e. quarter and semester review; 2. Is broader than drill. It takes in new relationships, and meanings and gives depth, organization and perspective; 3. Should be diversified by a variety of techniques and exercises motivated by emulation (especially at the high school level; 4. Demands careful preparation on the part of the teacher; 5. To omit periodic repetition with the idea of "covering more material" is to confuse the very idea of repetition; 6. Quarterly / semester repetition is of critical importance in high school; 7. Repetition is necessary for formation of habits.
F. ACTIVE TEACHING TECHNIQUES:
The use of discussion and objection and, within limits, emulation is an essential part of education. This prevents an attitude o passivity or mere absorption of information. Discussion, objection, emulation were the scholastic techniques of historical liberal education.
1. Discussion I objection are distinct aspects of the teaching art: a. They demand careful study and practice; b. Student participation in them is a valuable experience because of the precision and close reasoning required. 2. Emulation is valuable because of its universal appeal: a. It is based on the natural desire to excel; b. It centers the young mind on the class matter; c. It energizes effort in mastering it.
G. MAS TER Y FORMULA:
This is the second of the three significant and logically connected elements: self-activity, mastery, and formation.
1. The most effective motivation for the student in study is the growing sense of mastery; 2. Pertinence of class techniques: repetition, discussion, objection, etc.; 3. Need for constant and varied class exercises, written and oral, centering on the same material; 4. Testing of mastery to measure student achievement, diagnose weakness and guide the teacher in adapting procedures; 5. The teacher can never rest until he has brought students to their individual capacity. His initial procedures will be slow and thorough. A thorough grasp of fundamentals will make possible progression in the amount of matter than can be covered.
Synopsis of Implementation - Page 4
H. EXP RES S ION :
1. A student's ability to express himself is a test of the quality of his education, a. hence the need of constant exercises of written expression, b. hence, too, the value of the essentially active teaching techniques - discussion, objection, emulation and recitation - in the development of competent oral expression. 2. Similarly, the aim of traditional Ignatian extra-curricular activities is to develop the twofold power of expression: a. dramatics, b. debating, c. publications, d. literary academics, e. intra-school literary competition. 3. Teacher's prime task is the cultivation of this power in the student by: a. first, painstaking and constant guidance and correction of the student's effort in expression, and b. encouraging the more talented to persevere in seeking worthy and scholarly achievement in this field. 4. Emphasis should be on expression in high school. Expression is proof of "masterv"! The ability -to express oneself is the test of an educated person and the quality of his education. Emphasis should be placed on expression from the fifth grade through to the senior year in high school: a. correct grammar and idiom; b. on practice in typical forms of expression, i.e. description, exposition, narration, and argumentation. 5. The responsibility of the Ignatian trained student is to exert a Catholic influence on the academic and social sphere in which he lives.
Ad Majoren Dei Gloriam
The Twelve Virtues of a Good Teacher
by Brother Agathon, fifth Superior General of the Brothers of the Christian Schools from 1777 1795
My very dear Brothers, It would not be enough for us to know the duties imposed on us by our vows if we remain ignorant of the means we need, so as to correspond, as we should, with the end of our Institute, which is the instruction of children. This is why we intend, in the following pages, to discuss the virtues characteristic of a good teacher. You will certainly, very dear Brothers, eagerly welcome a work which is of such great importance for you. We have followed the plan given us by M. de La Salle, our venerable Founder. We have composed this treatise in accordance with his principles and maxims; and what we have drawn from others was taken from the most reliable authors. The virtues, or, what comes to the same thing, the qualities and characteristics of a good teacher are: Gravity, Silence, Humility, Prudence, Wisdom, Patience, Reserve, Gentleness, Zeal, Vigilance, Piety, and Generosity. We do not intend to speak of these virtues in theory; we are satisfied, and must be satisfied, with simply making an application of these virtues to the end we propose to attain; and it is in this perspective that we shall consider them in the pages that follow. Here is the order to which we shall conform. We shall explain the true character of each virtue, the particular traits proper to it, and the defects opposed to it. Thus, we are going to offer you a series of tableaux, as many as there are virtues to consider. In beholding these, an intelligent and attentive teacher will easily perceive what he needs to do and to avoid, so as to make his teaching more effective. Before beginning, we might observe that it would perhaps be easy to find a link concerning all these many virtues. Thus, we might list Wisdom first, because it presents the main objective, the total objective that a teacher should propose to himself. Prudence might be placed second, because it makes a teacher know how he should act so as to fulfill his role properly. Then the other virtues should follow, each in its place, and the work might end with Gentleness, the crowning virtue of a good teacher, thanks to the value given it by Charity, the queen and mistress of all virtues. But such an arrangement seemed to us a merely artificial one, of no real utility. We felt that we should follow the order that M. de La Salle himself considered proper to indicate to us. We have added, as a sort of post script, some reflections on the conditions which he calls for so that correction may be salutary both to the one who inflicts it, and to the one who receives it.
V. Wisdom Wisdom is a virtue which gives us knowledge of the most exalted things through the most excellent principles so that we may act accordingly. It differs from prudence for the latter merely presupposes a praiseworthy end, whatever it may be. Whereas, wisdom considers directly its object, and does so not only as good and praiseworthy but also as being very great and important. It can even happen that one of these two virtues may be present while the other is not. Let us give an example in general terms. We wish to have the last sacraments administered to someone suffering from a malady said to be serious and life-threatening. This is obviously an act of wisdom. But is it always an act of prudence also? No, doubtless; for we need to be morally sure, or to have at least a reasonable suspicion, that the illness is real and dangerous. In such a case, it is possible to be mistaken and to fail against prudence if, to inform oneself about the facts, one fails to fulfill the dictates of prudence, namely, by not carefully examining the circumstances, by judging of them too hastily, and in consequence, by acting in a manner lacking in consideration. Let us take another example, referring to the subject which we are discussing at present. A teacher wishes to give his students a lesson on the subject he teaches them, let us say, catechism. This is obviously an act of wisdom by which he seeks to fulfill his duty. But if he speaks to the children in too high-flown a manner, so that they do not grasp what he tells them, or if he makes use of vulgar expressions inappropriate for dealing with the dignity of the truths he must teach them, he certainly sins against prudence. There is, then, an essential difference between the two virtues we are here considering. In what, then, does the wisdom of the good teacher consist? It consists in making him know, love, and fulfill the exalted and infinitely precious object which he is responsible for; from this it follows that a good teacher must begin by imitating the example of Solomon who spoke humbly to the Author of all good, the God of reject me not from the number of Thy children. Send her forth from Thy sanctuary in heaven, and from the throne of Thy grandeur, so that she may be with me and work with me, and that I may know what is agreeable to Thee; for she is the knowledge and intelligence of all things; she will guide me in all my works with circumspection, and will protect me by her might; and thus my acts However, it is not enough for a good teacher to pray; he would act imprudently if, while teaching the students, he did not seek to instruct himself concerning what he wishes to teach them. Thus, he will apply himself to study, as we mentioned in speaking of prudence, but wisdom will also show him, and make him deeply cognizant not only of the truths he is obliged to teach, but of the principles of these subjects. Otherwise, he would be a reciter of formulas, and the students would only learn names, which they would promptly forget. Moreover, while imparting to them what he knows, he should take great care in particular not to tell them anything offensive or disdainful, or that might lead them to become ill-disposed towards himself or the school. He should never be led by hazardous opinions, nor by false prejudices, but always by Christian principles, by divine and human laws, and also by those of his nation. To teach children with greater benefit, wisdom requires that he himself should practice the virtues which he must cultivate in voice of power; the voice of action is much more impressive than Songs). Thus he will teach his students how to direct their actions in conformity with the true rules of behavior; to moderate and correct their passions; to become truly and genuinely happy. He will, therefore, make sure to give them the example of what he wishes to teach them; he will strive for his own sake and for the sake of instructing them, to distinguish what is truly good from what is such only in appearance; he will lead them to choose rightly and to persevere in every enlightened choice; to arrange all things with order and measure; in a word, to fulfill exactly their duties toward God, toward themselves, and toward others. In this way he will acquire this sublime wisdom which includes the most excellent science of all, without which all others are nothing in comparison: the science of salvation, which makes the soul relish the things of heaven, because it show to us all the sweetness and suavity of these things. It teaches us to follow what religion urges us to do; for example, to find our wealth in poverty, joy in those which men hold in slight esteem; to make good use of the blessings and the ills of this life; not to take any resolution save with upright and worthy views; not to pursue our aims except by legitimate means; to unite, in dealing with children, a just firmness with a praiseworthy mildness; example with practice; always to seek the spiritual advantages which enrich us for eternity rather than the temporal benefits which are only fleeting, being firmly persuaded that it is of no use for a man to gain the entire world if he then loses his soul; that earth and all its goods will pass away, but that whoever does the will of God will abide forever. Such, in fact, is true wisdom, which St. James exhorts us (James 1:5) to beg of God, and which above all will be the glory and crown of a good teacher. The defects contrary to this kind of admirable wisdom are: first, to prefer a merely human satisfaction to an act of supernatural virtue, show oneself more eager to acquire external talents and profane science rather than the necessary knowledge of religion. Second, to - love rather than to what can form Jesus Christ in the hearts of the students, to seek their friendship rather than to correct them of their defects, etc. There is another kind of wisdom which does not come down from on high, but on the contrary is earthly, animal, diabolical, as St. James says (James 3:19:62). This is a false wisdom blinded by passion: it follows only the suggestions of the malignant spirit; it adopts exclusively the maxims of the world, while rejecting those of the Gospel. It takes more pains about acquiring the virtues which may be agreeable to men rather than those which can please God. It acts only according to interested motives, seeking only what can be of benefit to itself. Moreover, in order to deceive and lead others astray more easily, it strives to disguise itself by appearing affable, mild, friendly, and polite; but it does not hesitate to make use of intrigue, ruse, fraud, artifice, subtlety, and trickery to achieve its ends. This is therefore nothing but true folly, as its unfortunate consequences - contention and jealousy - only too clearly show. uty never fades; those who love the friends of God, remarkable by the gifts of knowledge. Wisdom opens the lips of the dumb, and makes eloquent the tongues of little VIII. Gentleness
(French = douceur. One-third of the original French text is devoted to this virtue.) Gentleness is a virtue which inspires us with goodness, sensitivity, and tenderness. Jesus Christ is the most accomplished model of this virtue. He according to the Bishop of Geneva, as it were, the flower of charity. He adds, following St. Bernard, that gentleness is the perfection of charity, when it is not only patient but, over and above, meek and good natured. (Introduction to the Devout Life, 3rd part, c. 8). In general, we can distinguish four kinds of gentleness. The first is that of the mind, which consists in judging heart, which makes us want things without being stubborn about it, and seeks them in a righteous manner. The third is that of manner, which consists in behaving according to good principles, without wanting to reform others over whom we have no authority, or in things that do not concern us. The fourth is that of our conduct which makes us act with simplicity and uprightness, not contradicting others without reasonable cause, and without any obligation to do so; and observing, in this case, a reasonable degree of moderation. All these different forms of gentleness, in order to be genuine, must be very sincere; for says make people amuse themselves with words and conversations about gentleness and humility, without paying much attention to their inward affections. They think they are humble and gentle, but are really not such at all. This is recognized because, in spite of their ceremonious gentleness and humility, at the slightest cross word one may address to them, at the least injury proffered to them, What we have just said gives us to understand how singularly admirable is this virtue of gentleness, since it has humility as its companion, and because, when it is patient, it is in truth the perfection of charity. It follows, therefore, that under its first aspect, it restrains our fits of anger, smothers our desires for vengeance, and makes us face the misfortunes, disappointments, and other evils that can happen to us with entire equality of soul. Under its second aspect, which is its most distinctive mark, it wins the friendship of the students. It is a general principle that love wins love; a teacher should then, above and before all, cultivate the feelings of a father toward his pupils, and look upon himself as holding the place of those who entrusted them to him. He should borrow from the parents the sentiments of tenderness and goodness which are natural for them. He does this by showing gentleness; it inspires him, in regard to the students, with affection, tenderness, good will, winning and persuasive manners. It removes from his commands whatever might be abrupt and austere, and blunts their sting. Thus, it makes the children happy and attaches them to the teacher; and if they are reasonable, will they not always willingly yield to his insinuations and his gentleness, rather than to constraint and force? Let us give further consideration to the means by which a teacher can make himself loved by his students, thanks to gentleness. 1) He will begin by avoiding the defects that he must correct in them, for example, rough and shocking manners. 2) He will require good order and discipline that are neither harsh nor forbidding. 3) He will be simple, patient, precise in his manner of teaching; he will count more on his own consistency in having the rules followed, than on an excess of application on the part of the pupils. 4) He shall show equal kindness toward all, without any partiality, preference, or particular attention to anyone. 5) He should not overlook the mistakes which need to be pointed out, but it should be done gently and carefully. When he corrects, he should not be either bitter or offensive or insulting; and immediately after he has punished anyone he shall take care to dissipate the fear that the punishment may have caused the child, by making him acknowledge his fault, and the rightness of the punishment, and by recommending to him not to put himself in the same situation again. 6) He will be consistent in his dealings; this is all the more essential since if each day found the teacher in a different mood, by a change in his humor or his manner of speaking, the children would never know precisely what to count on, and would not fail to lose respect for him, and to find his constant changes ridiculous, unbearable, and very apt to make them lose interest in school or even to inspire them with aversion for it. 7) He shall give them the liberty of making known their difficulties, and he shall answer them willingly and with kindness in so far as it is necessary. 8) He praises them appropriately when they deserve it. Although this praise may be feared because of the vanity that it might arouse, it is necessary to make use of it in order to encourage them without elating them too much; for of all the motives capable of touching a rational soul, there is none more powerful than honor and shame; and when one has been able to make children susceptible to them, one has gained a victory. They derive pleasure from praise and esteem, especially from their parents and from those on whom they depend. 9. He shall often speak to them of virtue, but always appropriately and in praise of it, as being the most precious of possessions, in order to inspire them to love it and to model their behavior by it. 10) Every day he shall tell them something edifying which may help them toward leading a Christian and virtuous life. 11) He shall teach them the politeness which they need and the proprieties which they must observe in order to be esteemed in society and live there honorably; thus he shall take pains to make them respectful, gentle, honest, considerate, obliging toward their superiors, their companions, and to everyone. It is very important, indeed, to oppose certain tendencies in young people which are directly opposed to the common duties of society and of civil converse: a rough and unrestrained uncouthness which prevents them from thinking about what may please or displease those with whom they live; a self-love which pays attention only to their own comfort and advantage; an overbearing and haughty attitude which makes them think that everything is due to them, while they owe nothing to anyone; a spirit of contradiction, of criticism, of mockery, which condemns everything and seeks only to wound others. Such are the defects against which open war must be declared. Young people who have been brought up to be considerate for their companions, to give them pleasure, to yield to them on occasion, never to say anything outrageous about them, and not to take offense easily at what others say - such young people will soon learn, when they take their place in the world, the value of politeness and of civilized behavior. 12) A good teacher educates the heart, the mind, and the judgment of his pupils by the following means: A) to educate the heart he will forestall the passions and vices; this is done by inspiring the children with aversion and horror for the occasions of sin, by combating the evil inclinations which they display; by leading them to love Christian virtue; by teaching them the necessity of practicing these virtues and indicating to them the occasions when they should do so; by helping them acquire good habits, making them understand, for instance, the difference between a boy who is honest and sincere, on whose word one can rely, and whom one can trust implicitly, who is considered incapable not only of lying or deceit, but even of the slightest dissembling; and another boy who always gives rise to suspicion, whom nobody feels safe in trusting, and whose word one cannot believe, even when he happens to tell the truth. B) To educate their minds, a teacher will instruct his students zealously and with affection in the dogmas and duties of religion, and in whatever can make them men capable of directing themselves by right reason, and so becoming citizens useful to society. This further requires that he should always think of and speak with them correctly, with reason, with good sense, and should accustom them to do likewise in all the occasions which come up. He points out errors to them and calls them to order when they fail in this; he catches their mistakes when they judge badly or talk nonsense, or take things the wrong way. He accustoms them to act with so much discernment that they may always have a praiseworthy end in view, and may always be prepared to give valid reasons for what they want, do, and say. C) To educate their judgment, he will point out to them the relationships things have with one another, and the properties which distinguish them from each other. He shall make them speak of these things according to the understanding which they should have at first gained of them themselves, and do so always with correctness and precision; he shall present to them the comparison of what is reprehensible in their conduct with what they should have thought, said, done or not done. Even so, when striving thus to educate the heart, the mind, and the judgment of his students, a teacher still cannot expect to succeed unless he avoids whatever smacks of harshness. A teacher fails by harshness when he demands of his students what is beyond their capacity, requiring them, for instance, to recite lessons of catechism or of other more difficult matters which their memory does not allow them to retain; or by imposing penances on them out of proportion to their faults; he should consider that he himself would be as culpable, by giving excessive punishments, even if merited, as though he had punished someone who had not deserved it at all. He would fail again if he demanded things with so much over- bearingness and pride that the students would obviously not be disposed to conform; if he exacted such things when they are ill- disposed, without paying attention to the fact that they are not ready to profit by the efforts of his zeal, so long as they listen only to passion, resentment, and their ill will. He would also fail when he shows equal insistence on things of trifling importance and on those which are more essential; when he never listens to the pleas or the excuses of the students, thereby depriving himself of a means of correcting his own mistakes; or by never pardoning them their faults, even though he should forgive a good many in which there is neither malice nor evil consequences to fear, such as failures arising from ignorance, distraction, forgetfulness, frivolity, heedlessness, and other defects which are normal at such an age; when he shows himself perpetually dissatisfied with the behavior of his pupils, whatever it may be, never appearing to them save in a grouchy mood or with a freezing air; never opening his mouth except to say cutting, disagreeable, improper, injurious remarks; when he shows continual bias against them, interpreting badly everything they do; when he exaggerates their faults; when he acts toward them as though they were irrational beings, without any feelings: for instance, by jerking them, pulling on them, striking them violently in anger. (Such behavior can only be the result of a fit of temper, of which a teacher, more than anyone else, should be incapable); when he does not inform the children why he is punishing them; when he punishes doubtful infractions just as he does the ones he is sure of; pardons anything even when they have committed only minor faults such as having accidentally written a page badly, or having come late to school once, or having been caught not following the lesson; when their faults are neither against religion nor good morals, such as words or actions contrary to purity, swearing, fighting, disobedience, stealing, lying, lack of reverence in church the pupils lose their love of work, their liking for what is good. It disheartens them and makes them complain of injustice.
A teacher should convince himself: 1) that punishment itself does less to correct faults than the manner of imposing it; 2) that if the teacher inspires excessive fear by inflexibility and noble sentiments, makes them lose all worthy sentiments, and gives them a hatred for the school and for learning; 3) that by wanting to spare no fault, he will prevent his corrections from being useful; 4) that by wise moderation he can win over those whom he would only irritate by indiscreet harshness. 5) that he will never succeed in making the pupils fear him save by inspiring them with attention to these, or if these things make no impression on them, all his authority will remain powerless to make them fear him. Moreover, it must not be forgotten that if gentleness is full of charity, it must still be firm. Charity can indeed for a time attract the hearts of the students, but it does not suffice; when they begin to take things easy, as they do from time to time, then firmness must take over to keep them within the bounds of duty, or to bring them back when they have departed therefrom. My son let your deeds be done in gentleness and you will draw down on yourself not only the esteem but the love of men The Wise Man wishes to see gentleness employed; and at the same time he wishes us to do perfectly what we are about; this is to show that he wants this gentleness to be firm Firmness, therefore, according to the words of Scripture which we have just quoted, consists in complete faithfulness in observing everything that can lead to the end proposed; thus, it requires of a teacher strength, courage, and constancy: a) Strength to oppose whatever might be contrary to good order, not letting the difficulties and pains found in teaching dishearten him. This is necessary, for instance, when a teacher arrives for the first time in a class; for the first concern of the students in such a situation is to study the new teacher and to size him up to discover whether he has some weak point, and if so, to profit by it. When they see, on the contrary, that the teacher quietly and in an unruffled manner opposes a gentle and reasonable firmness to their tricks and their attempts at disturbing him, they soon submit and come back to the path of duty. b) Courage to keep trying to do whatever may produce or preserve good order, and the progress of the students. quietly to confront obstacles, opposition, problems even in spite of little hope of success. The main point here is to apply a firm gentleness to the guidance of the students, and for this it is essential to pay attention to the special circumstances in which they are, in order to combine wise gentleness with firmness. Thus, gentleness does not prevent a teacher from punishing the faults which should be corrected, but it does not allow him to show himself inflexibly firm, save when the method of gentleness and exhortation and all his efforts, repeated warnings, written punishments and other sanctions, along with other reasonable procedures have been used without correcting or overcoming a stubborn attitude, a disobedience maintained with obstinate ill-will, a mocking air, and an attitude of rebellion, an invincible laziness, missing school, notable and habitual negligence, disinclination and aversion toward study, duplicity and underhandedness, flattery, a tendency to tale-bearing, provoking divisions, slander and a mocking spirit. However, a teacher must never forget that inexorable strictness on his part will, as a rule, alienate the students, spur them to revolt, indispose their parents, and everybody else. Gentleness does not even permit us, when punishing, to appeal to our authority exclusively.(The original text here has a long footnote on authority. This important note has been transferred to the end of this treatment of Gentleness. [editor] ) When naked authority is invoked, it can indeed constrain the guilty party, but it does not correct him. If imperious manners inspire the boys with forced respect, they will obey while they are observed and while the teacher is with them, for they cannot do otherwise; but they come back to their old ways the moment they are out of his sight. Thus to reach a proper combination of gentleness with firmness we must not fall into any of the drawbacks of either. It is this happy medium which gives a teacher the authority which is the soul of obedience and submission. Thus, what should characterize the relationship on both sides, and be the principal consideration for both teacher and students, is gentleness and love. One should moreover carefully shun all the defects opposed to firmness. Thus, one will, in the first place, avoid weakness. A teacher sins by weakness when he fails to realize that he incurs guilt if he does not punish the faults which he should punish, or when he allows the students to do whatever they like, to violate order while feeling sure that they will not be punished for their misconduct. In the second place, he should avoid cowardly complaisance and spineless condescension. A teacher fails in this way when he does not use all the means given to him to succeed in his task; when he is inconsistent in his conduct and backs off ill-advisedly from proper firmness; when he considers as light or indifferent what might be a real and considerable evil; when for personal considerations of whatever kind he tolerates what should not be condoned; when, not wishing to take the trouble, he does not pay sufficient attention to the proper discipline in the class or to the progress of the students, and does not correct even the slightest faults contrary thereto; when he lets the students neglect or despise what he has rightly ordered or recommended; when he speaks ineffectually, acts in an indolent and indifferent manner, failing to show that he really wants the students to do their duty; when he is content with issuing ineffectual warnings. In the third place, he should avoid too much communication with the students. This leads them to despise the teacher, to become insubordinate, to show a distaste for work and application. It makes the students willful, undocile, rebellious; it encourages laziness and other vices, threatens their progress, allows evil habits to take root. When the teacher lacks the necessary determination and firmness, he is made fun of by the students, and lends himself inappropriately to their desires because of his own cowardice and reprehensible timidity. There is no doubt that he should be affable with his students; but this does not allow him to become familiar with them. In the fourth place, he should avoid the other defects contrary to firmness, which are: inconstancy; excessive timidity; a hang-dog look; a naive, unnatural, troubled, embarrassed air, as well as stubbornness, obstinacy, presumption, an inflexibility which never gives way, a rigidity that never yields either to reason or to legitimate authority, or even to force. Let us now go on to speak of punishments. We have seen that a teacher procures the good of his students by charitable gentleness, and that he maintains it by a firm gentleness. We must now show that he forestalls or corrects evil by his wise and prudent gentleness. First of all, he rejects the use of the rod or the whip. 1) These punishments are improper; they are also servile and demeaning and lead to serious consequences. 2) In correcting, one should use the means which will afford the greatest benefit to the students, through shame for having acted badly, preferably to those which would prevent them from falling again into a fault through fear of corporal chastisement. 3) Such punishments inspire aversion for the teacher who uses them and for the school. 4) They do nothing to change the heart and of themselves do not modify the nature. 5) They often brutalize the mind and harden the culprit in his evil ways. 6) The students get used to them and become unaffected by them so that in the long run they derive no benefit from them.
7) They expose the teacher to scorn, insults, and humiliations. 8) They are not really necessary. The best teachers, and the great majority of them, succeed in school even when they do not make use of such punishments. more helpful both for the teacher and for the students themselves. It is the rod the correction of children, but, says a commentator: this means that when it is necessary one should correct them with a holy severity. It is not being kind it is rather being inhuman to favor vices and evil habits in a child, in order to spare him a few tears; whoever lets him go ahead in his evil ways, through this cruel indulgence, does not treat him like a father, but like an enemy. Moreover, if parents (to whom Scripture is speaking here) are obliged to correct their offspring by using the rod, this kind of correction does not have, for them, the same inconveniences which it would have for a teacher. When their children show a character which is churlish, stubborn, hard-headed, indocile, unaffected by reprimands and appeals to honor, parents are certainly justified in opposing these nascent vices by using corporal punishments capable of mastering those who cannot be corrected by other, less violent, means. But the wisest thing for a teacher to do when confronted by students whom he cannot bring back to the path of duty save by punishments, is to send them back to their parents, while observing, of course, the measures prescribed by the Conduct of the Christian Schools in such cases. The following means can be used to avoid having to inflict punishments, or to make them rare, and to insure their effectiveness: 1) Early on, the students should be trained in docility; for this the teacher should show a firmness and a consistency of conduct from which he will never depart. When the students do something wrong, he must reprove them in an authoritative way, that is, a certain manner of speaking and acting which betokens energy and strength, and which suggests the master, the superior. Otherwise, the pupils would rebel against their teacher, or put themselves on the same footing as he, refuse submission and order, and do as they please. 2) The teacher should never allow himself to act through passion, ill humor, or caprice. This is one of the worst faults an educator can commit, because this never escapes the sharp eyes of the qualities, and robs his advice and his remonstrances of practically all authority. 3) The students should be brought to feel remorse and shame for their faults, rather than to fear the punishments they may have deserved. 4) The teacher should carefully distinguish between the faults which deserve punishment and those which he should forgive; moreover, he should not punish in the same way involuntary and inadvertent faults, and those committed with forethought and malice. 5) The teacher should attach the notion of shame and punishment to any number of things which may be indifferent in themselves, be left there for too long a time lest he be harmed.) A child may be put in the last place at a given table or bench, or near the door, or last in ranks; he may be made to sit in the middle of the classroom, or to stand in a certain place near a wall without touching it; or holding a book with both hands for an hour while standing in the middle of the classroom, under penalty of further punishment if he fails to act properly. All the while, the teachers should show him a cold, dissatisfied face, for as long as he does badly, or does not do all he should. 6) No penances should be imposed which are not just; and preference should be given to those which are less severe when these can bring about the desired effect. The teacher shall always avoid those which might detract from the lesson, such as hitting a student when he is not expecting it. This would keep the students in constant fear, trepidation, and apprehension whenever they saw the teacher approaching them; it would make them more attentive to warding off possible blows which the teacher might aim at them unexpectedly, rather than to paying attention to what he wanted to tell them for their instruction. 7) The fear which children should be inspired to feel should not always be the fear of being punished, but of the wrong they might be guilty of, and which they should carefully try to avoid. 8) The teacher should prefer useful penances to corporal chastisement, even to the ferule, which should be used rarely. He will then give them, along with the other penances already mentioned, a few chapters of the catechism, or some other book, to be studied and recited by heart; some page of penmanship or spelling, or arithmetic problems; some of this could be done at home. Such punishments have the double advantage of keeping the children usefully occupied outside of school time, of getting them used to working harder, of keeping them away from gambling and bad company, and of helping them learn more. 9) He should not make a given penance something habitual, or of daily use. The students would not fear it any more; they would make a joke of it. He should diversify his penances. 10) The teacher should take care to wait for the favorable time and manner of imposing a penance, so that it can prove more fruitful. Thus, he should not always correct a child at the moment he commits a fault, especially if he is not well disposed; this might only irritate him more and incite him to commit new faults, by pushing him beyond endurance. Let the teacher allow him time to realize what he has done, to enter into himself, to admit his wrongdoing, and at the same time, to acknowledge the rightness and the necessity of the punishment. By this means the teacher will bring him to the point of being able to profit by the correction. On his part, the teacher must never punish out of anger, especially if the fault refers to him personally, that is, a lack of respect, insolence, an insulting or disrespectful word. No matter how little emotion appears on his countenance or in his tone of voice, the student will immediately notice it; he will feel that it is not zeal for duty but the flame of passion which lighted this fire; and this is all it takes to make the punishment lose all its efficacy, because children, young as they are, feel that nothing but reason has a right to correct them. The second means for making punishments rare, or to forestall them is to instruct, reprove, and threaten before resorting to punishment. The teacher should, therefore, begin by instructing the students carefully about their duties. If they thereafter fail to conform to these rules, what then? If it is because of impossibility or incapacity, they should be excused, because we cannot require the impossible from anyone. If it is through forgetfulness, or inattention, but without malice, they should be warned. If it is through malice, they should be warned also, but sternly; if they persist, they should be reproved; if they fall again, they should be threatened; then if there is no amendment they should be punished. Thus, punishment is the final effort that the teac should make him use to bring a recalcitrant pupil to submission. For ordinary faults, warnings should be frequent, as often as the pupils give occasion for them; they should always be polite, spoken with kindness, and in a manner which induces the pupils to receive them willingly. The teacher should therefore avoid making the students think that he is prejudiced against them, lest by attributing these warnings to partiality, they thereby protect themselves from the defects pointed out to them. Nor should they have any reason to think that they are being warned because of some natural interest, or some special passion; in fact, for any motive other than their own good. Use of reprimands should not be frequent. This is the big difference between reprimands and warnings. The latter spring rather from the kindness of a friend than from the authority of a teacher; they are always accompanied by a gentle air and tone of voice, which makes them less disagreeable to accept, and for this reason they can be used more often, as we have said above. But as reprimands always sting self-love to some extent, and are often accompanied by a severe look and stern language, they should be reserved for more considerable defects, and hence should be used more rarely. Still, they should always be given without harshness, mockery, or exaggeration, without angry words; without partiality; and in such a manner that if the students are properly disposed they may be ashamed, and feel sorry for their faults, may resolve to correct themselves and take a firm resolution inspired by the good motives suggested to them. One should, however, be careful, immediately after reprimanding someone, not to show him the same serenity and the same affection as before; for he would get used to this little charade, convinced that these reprimands are only a summer shower, soon dissipated, and that he only needs to wait until they pass. The teacher should, therefore, not pardon him right away, until his application to doing better has proven the sincerity of his repentance. As for threats, since they come closer to actual punishment than reprimands, they should be even rarer. They should not be employed save for very legitimate reasons, and never without having first examined if we can or should carry them out. Otherwise, they should not be used; for if we make threats inconsiderately, they grow ineffective, and the guilty parties will be emboldened in their evil ways, by a sort of assurance of impunity. A third means of forestalling punishments or of making them rare is to prevent the faults of the students and make them rare. This can be done by using various procedures that can bring them to do their duty and continue doing it, such as words of praise granted appropriately and justly, but in such a way as not to encourage the despise others. Another means is to show satisfaction and pleasure to those who do well, giving them special marks of consideration and esteem; granting them privileges and outstanding awards which should consist not in frivolous gee- gaws or useless claptrap, but in worthwhile and edifying objects. Again, the teacher should give positive accounts of them to their parents and others interested in them; he might advance them in ranks as far as this is possible; he should point out to them the advantage there is in being well- versed in many things which make a man better qualified in whatever business he engages later on. There is no doubt that all these ways of threatening affect the minds of the students more powerfully than all threats and punishments. According to everything we have been saying, it is easy to conclude that the wise and prudent meekness of a good teacher does not prevent him, when punishing, from pursuing the end he has in mind, and that it is only for their own good, out of necessity, with regret that he punishes them; that he would do them a great deal of harm if he allowed them to give in to their evil inclinations and to contract wicked habits; that it is at their age that they are becoming what they will be for the rest of their lives; that to live honorably in the world and to be faithful to the duties awaiting them there, nothing is more important for them than to be rightly brought up and corrected when they deserve it; that the sorrow they feel at the moment will yield great advantages for the rest of their lives; and that they will be glad, when older, to have acquired the habits whose true value they will then appreciate, habits which will make them more acceptable to those they will have to deal with. It is also easy to understand that the true gentleness of a good teacher consists in seeking among the sentiments of goodness which fill his heart, only the amendment and the real benefit of those whom he punishes, the success of his ministry and of his efforts. He requires nothing save with circumspection, and awaits patiently for the opportune moment for obtaining what he wants of his pupils. Finally, it is easy to understand with what care a teacher should avoid ironical and biting language. Far from being a means apt to correct students, such words, on the contrary, can only dispose them unfavorably against the teacher and make the efforts of his zeal useless or nearly so. For it is clear that a student who lacks esteem for and attachment to a teacher whose insulting manner has wounded and ulcerated his heart will, as a rule, accept with all his instructions. He will nearly always remember that his teacher had the meanness, the offensiveness, the cowardice of making fun of him and ridiculing him for defects of body or mind, or others, instead of correcting or warning him gently, so as to win for him the friendship of his companions. Here are several other defects contrary to gentleness: petulance; the impetuous sallies of an over-ardent nature; bizarre, black moods; unpredictable, surly reactions; cross, somber airs; harsh and contemptuous ways; arrogant and supercilious attitudes; proud looks; severe, bitter, and peevish words filled with bile; insulting language (which students never fail to report back to their parents, to indispose them against the teacher and to explain their own dislike for him and their aversion for school); violent agitation; restlessness; precipitate, indiscreet, brutal, over-severe corrections lacking in any just reason and extending beyond the limits of justice and charity. All this debases authority and makes it detested. For in such cases it is regarded merely as tyranny; this cannot fail to cause mutiny, hatred, cursing, and a hypersensitivity which explodes when the child is the object of some scorn or insult. There is, however, a type of anger which is virtuous. This is the kind which is aroused only by a vehement desire of doing good, or opposing evil, of maintaining right order and the discipline which must be maintained. Such anger is necessary, but it must be governed by reason, proportionate to the faults committed, and to the interest one should take in what happens. It should always be such that one keeps self-control. In such circumstances, one should manifest this kind of anger, either to show that one is right in exacting what is good, and in being indignant at the failures one seeks to correct; or to lead those who do wrong to condemn and reform themselves; but this must always be done as the Prophet The anger we should be on our guard against, and which is a sin, is that which arises from an ill-regulated emotion of the soul. It leads to acts of revenge, or to violent responses to what displeases us. Such anger unsettles the judgment and blinds reason. only the esteem but also the love