DOCSLIB.ORG

Number of I-129 Petitions for a Nonimmigrant Temporaryagricultural Worker (H-2A), by State and Case Status

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Number of I-129 Petitions for a Nonimmigrant Temporaryagricultural Worker (H-2A), by State and Case Status Number of I-129 Petitions for a Nonimmigrant Temporary Agricultural Worker (H-2A), by State and Case Status, April 1 - June 30, 2018 Petitions by State, Company, and FEIN (Last 4 Digits) Petitions by U.S. Employer and U.S. Agent1 Petitioner Location Petitions Received2 Approved3 Denied4 Pending5 Grand Total 3622 3492 40 532 Petitions by State6 Alabama 3490 ALLEE & ALLEN FARMS LLC 2 2 6907 SCOTT S ORCHARD 1 1 7725 GUATE HARVESTING LLC 1 1 9324 ELLIS FARMS 1 1 Alabama Total 5 3 2 Alaska 1726 MOSESIAN FARMS OF ALASKA INC 2 2 1 4457 FRONTIER FARMS AND NURSERY LLC DBA 1 5594 A 1 NURSERY & TREE FARM 1 1 Alaska Total 3 4 1 Arizona 0560 PGM PACKING INC 2 2 1211 CENTRAL AZ FARMING INC 1 1 1311 CENTRAL ARIZONA FARMING INC 3 3 4031 DV FARMS LLC 1 5204 THE GROWERS CO INC 2 2 THE GROWERS COMPANY INC 1 1 6777 SILVER CANYON NURSERIES INC DBA WH 1 1 7145 MELBY CUSTOM CONTRACTING INC 1 1 7464 SERVICIOS AGRICOLAS MEX INC 1 1 8065 CRANE HARVESTING & TRUCKING INC 2 3 8988 AG INSTALLERS INC 4 3 1 8998 AG INSTALLERS INC 1 9335 KENLY FARMS INC 1 1 Arizona Total 19 18 4 Arkansas 0066 TERRY R FULLER 1 0076 HAROLD AND HENSLEY TOMATO LLC 1 1 0447 BRAD HARROD FARMS 1 1 0730 LESLIE T BROWN FARMS 1 1 0756 GARY LYNN GRICE DBA LYNN GRICE FAR 1 1 0972 DARROW LINN SR 1 1 1090 FARM H2A LLC 1 1 1538 BEARSKIN FARM 1 1 1658 SHOFFNER FARM RESEARCH INC 1 1 1886 ZACH FERRELL FARMS 1 1 2120 HARROD AND HENSLEY TOMATO LLC 1 2270 LARRY MCCLENDON FARMS 1 2526 NORTH FORK FARMS 1 1 2597 GODWIN FARMS PARTNERSHIP 1 2690 C & C HOOVER FARMS LLC 1 1 2731 C & C SOD INC 1 1 2873 BAXTER LAND CO 1 1 3261 P & E PARTNERS 1 3702 EUSEPPI FARMING CO 1 1 3949 MEDFORD AND SONS 1 1 4015 C R C FARMS 1 4188 JAMES A CARTER JR DBA J&L FARMS 1 1 4760 RAMOS FARM 1 1 5008 DRIVER FARMS PARTNERSHIP 1 1 5475 GREEN HILL FARMS INC 1 1 5968 LOWRY FARMS INC 4 3 1 1 6210 CHAPPELL BROTHERS FARM LLC 2 2 7283 RAYMOND L & LOUISE G PIERONI FARM 1 1 7651 BRICKEYS GRAIN CO 1 2 8005 DOUBLE D FARMS 1 1 8545 CASTONS BLUEBERRIES 1 1 8584 FLORENDEN FARMS 1 1 8746 THREE E FARMS 1 8789 JOHNSVILLE FARMS LLC 1 1 9562 NTB FARMS PARTNERSHIP 1 1 9877 BRADLEY LABOR GROUP LLC 2 2 Arkansas Total 34 38 1 4 Number of I-129 Petitions for a Nonimmigrant Temporary Agricultural Worker (H-2A), by State and Case Status, April 1 - June 30, 2018 Petitions by State, Company, and FEIN (Last 4 Digits) Petitions by U.S. Employer and U.S. Agent1 Petitioner Location Petitions Received2 Approved3 Denied4 Pending5 California MR MODESTO DOMINGUEZ RANCH 1 WESTERN RANGE ASSO 1 WESTERN RANGE ASSOCIATION 1 (blank) 1 0039 LA PALMA FARMS INC 1 1 0330 BROTHERS BEST PRODUCE 2 2 0333 PREMIUM PACKING INC 2 2 0427 LUCKY AG INC 2 2 0579 COMBS LANDSCAPE AND NURSERY 1 1 0609 FOUR WINDS FARM LLC 1 0718 PACIFICA PERSONNEL INC 2 2 0802 RODRIGUEZ FARMS INC 1 1 0927 TALLEY FARMS 2 2 0929 BOWLAND VINEYARD MGMT INC 1 1021 (blank) 1 1 1283 FAIRVIEW HONEY 1 1 1306 PEAY VINEYARDS LLC 1 1 1351 PINE RIDGE WINERY LLC DBA ARCHERY 1 1 1975 GERAWAN FARMING INC 2 2 2035 J C HARVESTING CORP 2 3 2175 RIO VISTA CORPORATION 1 1 2499 SIERRA FARMS LLC 1 1 2565 L JOHNSON EQUIPMENT RENTALS 1 2607 WEST COAST TOMATO GROWERS INC 2 2 2882 JC FARMS LLC 1 1 2928 GROWERS LINK 2 1 1 2971 FRESH HARVEST INC 25 24 3 3008 JR CUSTOM HARVESTING CO INC 2 1 1 3027 RODRIGUEZ BROS RANCH LLC 1 1 3055 GIUSTI FARMS LLC 1 1 3263 QUALITY PRODUCE LLC 1 1 3408 AFTERMARKET INS BROKERAGE DBA AIM 1 3640 MAC AG INC 1 1 3704 ROBERTO PEREZ FARMS 1 3845 E&A FARMING 1 1 4405 JBR INC DBA ROGERS FAMILY CO 1 1 4686 EMPIRE FARM LABOR CONTRACTOR LLC 2 2 4819 SPLENDOR SALAD 1 1 4932 FOOTHILL PACKING INC 3 4 1 4940 (blank) 1 1 4952 WONDERFUL BEES 1 1 5343 CFE FARMS INC 1 1 5541 GC FARMING INC 1 1 5546 RANCH NUEVO HARVESTING INC 1 RANCHO NUEVO HARVESITNG INC 1 1 RANCHO NUEVO HARVESTING INC 17 17 2 5560 SALINAS FARM LABOR CONTRACTOR INC 1 1 5659 JMC FARMING INC 1 1 5723 OLIVE VALLEY INC 2 2 5769 BALLETTO RANCH INC 1 1 5897 FRESH VALUE FARMS 1 1 6062 D & J PACKING LLC 2 3 D&J PACKING LLC 1 1 6103 ROBLEDO & SONS LLC 2 2 6407 A OSEGUERA CO INC 4 4 1 1 6499 IXTAPA FARMING 1 6668 BUENAVENTURA RANCH LLC 5 4 1 6958 (blank) 1 1 7169 HILL TOP PRODUCE INC 1 1 7611 BAZAN VINEYARD MANAGEMENT LLC 1 1 7677 PEREZ BROS FARMS INC 1 7746 I S A CONTRACTING SVCS INC 1 1 7825 BELLA VISTA FARMING CO LLC 1 1 8068 RANCHO DEL MAR INC 1 8337 NEW HOPE HARVESTING INC 1 NEW HOPE HARVESTING LLC 1 1 1 8512 HUMBERTO CASTANEDA PRODUCE 1 1 8967 RC FARMS LLC 1 1 9070 AGEMPLEO LP 5 3 2 9130 MCF4 SOLUTIONS LLC 2 2 9183 SARC INC 4 4 Number of I-129 Petitions for a Nonimmigrant Temporary Agricultural Worker (H-2A), by State and Case Status, April 1 - June 30, 2018 Petitions by State, Company, and FEIN (Last 4 Digits) Petitions by U.S. Employer and U.S. Agent1 Petitioner Location Petitions Received2 Approved3 Denied4 Pending5 9281 JAIME S GROVE SVC INC 2 2 9409 FERRARI CARANO VINEYARDS & WINERY 1 1 9460 ST ROMO LABOR FORCE LLC 1 2 9528 WONDERFUL BEES 4 5 1 9899 CHRISTENSEN & GLANNINI LLC 1 1 9930 ROYAL OAK AG SVCS INC 1 1 9948 ELKHORN PACKING CO LLC 11 13 1 California Total 149 156 2 22 Colorado 0453 JAMES CRAIG BAIR RANCH CO 1 1 0785 WILLIAMS ORCHARDS LLC 2 2 0865 BLACK BEAR ORCHARDS LLC 1 1 0999 BOB ROGERS FARMS INC 1 1022 RAY DOMENICO FARMS INC 2 2 1223 G H DANIELS III & ASSOCIATES INC 1 1 1482 CATHEDRAL CREEK RANCH LLC 1 1 1830 STEELE LIVESTOCK 1 1 1969 WELLSWEEP RANCHES 1 1 2746 DEAN MANTLE RANCH 1 1 2802 MARIA MITCHEK FARMS 1 1 2830 KRUCKENBERG CONSULTING LLC 1 1 2890 SOUTHERN CROSS RANCHES 1 1 1 3683 KNAPP FARMS LLC 1 4035 FAGERBERG PRODUCE INC 1 1 4046 MARTINEZ FARMS LLC 1 1 4088 FULLER ORCHARDS LLC 1 1 4504 CARLOS & ERNESTINE GALICIA FARMS 1 1 5099 HARRY KOURLIS RANCH 1 5306 CYCLONE RANCH LLC 1 5454 KORBY SOD LLC 1 1 5514 JAMES G LEPRINO TALL TIMBERS RANC 1 1 5832 HIRAKATA FARMS LLC 1 1 6477 PEAK RANCH INC 1 1 6610 LAZY 3X SHEEP COMPANY LLC 1 1 6663 MATTEW PROCTOR FARMS 1 1 6803 LAZY 3X CATTLE INC 1 1 LAZY 3X CATTLE LLC 3 3 7148 SAIMS FRUIT INC 1 1 7453 DBA MCCRACKEN ORCHARD 1 1 7578 WELDER RANCH 1 1 7708 PAT HUGHES RANCH 1 7895 HULTEEN ORCHARDS INC 1 1 8382 SUAREZ ORCHARD 1 1 8436 STATELINE CROP CONSULTANTS INC 1 1 8437 HANAGAN FARMS 1 1 8598 FIRST FRUIT ORGANIC FARMS INC 1 1 8602 MAURO FARMS 1 8880 UPPER COLORADO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANT 1 1 9042 TRIPLE M ORCHARDS LLC 1 1 9547 STAR FARMS INC 2 2 9740 JOHN FREDRICK HAROLD DBA TUXEDO CO 1 1 TUXEDO CORN CO LLC ET AL 1 1 9747 NIESBROS FARMS INC 1 1 9936 BRUSH MOUNTAIN RANCH LLC 1 1 Colorado Total 44 46 5 Connecticut 1708 HAIGHT BROWN VINEYARD 1 1 6720 CANTERBURY HORTICULTURE LLC 1 1 Connecticut Total 2 1 1 Delaware 0710 HANOVER FOODS DELAWARE INC 1 1 Delaware Total 1 1 Florida VERNON DIXON HARVESTING INC 1 1 0037 SAUCEDA CONTRACTORS INC 1 1 0230 KING RANCH TURFGRASS L P 1 2 0241 AGUILERA HARVESTING CORP 2 2 0375 FLORIDA ORANGE GOLD INC 1 1 FLORIDA ORANGE GOLD LLC 1 1 0416 JACINTO HERNANDEZ HARVESTING INC 3 1 3 0422 A AND M LABOR MGMT INC 2 1 1 0533 OLVERA TRUCKING CORP 3 1 2 0626 LAGUNITA HARVESTING LLC 7 6 1 0694 GUERRERO AG LLC 1 1 0739 J & P HARVEST INC 3 2 1 Number of I-129 Petitions for a Nonimmigrant Temporary Agricultural Worker (H-2A), by State and Case Status, April 1 - June 30, 2018 Petitions by State, Company, and FEIN (Last 4 Digits) Petitions by U.S. Employer and U.S. Agent1 Petitioner Location Petitions Received2 Approved3 Denied4 Pending5 0866 LEOS HARVESTING 1 1 0877 BALTAZAR GARCIA HARVESTING & GROVE 1 1 1015 HESS ORCHARDS FARM MARKET LLC 1 1 1059 HACIENDA FARMS INC 4 3 1 1209 THREE G TRUCKING LLC 2 2 1387 SANDOVAL PRODUCE INC 1 1 1431 DELEON AGRICULTURAL SVC LLC 3 3 DELEON AGRICULTURAL SVCS LLC 1 1 1438 THREE G TRUCKING INC 1 1 1447 FLORIDA PACIFIC FARMS LLC 1 1 1824 FARM OP INC 1 2 1876 RED HARVESTING INC 5 4 1 1879 S A S FARMS INC 1 2 1910 YU AN FARMS CO 1 1 1945 RODRIGO GUTIERREZ TAPIA DBA 5 G HA 1 1 2065 A1 AG SVCS INC 1 1 2316 SUNSTATE HARVESTERS INC 4 3 2 2390 RUIZ HARVESTING INC 2 1 1 2468 TAPIA NURSERY INC 1 1 2549 EVERGLADES HARVESTIG AND HAULING I 1 1 EVERGLADES HARVESTING & HAULING IN 1 1 EVERGLADES HARVESTING AND HAULING 6 5 1 2597 EB HARVESTING LLC 6 5 1 2818 FC OF ARCADIA INC 1 2820 TEMP LABOR LLC 1 1 1 2837 ALPHA CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTING SVC 1 1 2937 JACKSON CITRUS INC 13 7 7 2945 F MADRID HARVESTING INC 8 7 1 3021 GUTIERREZ HARVESTING LLC 1 3082 M K HARVESTING INC 4 2 2 3087 F C A HARVESTING INC 1 1 3104 TRIPLE S HARVESTING LLC 2 2 3269 PREMIER PACKING LLC 1 1 3291 REYNA HARVESTING 4 4 (blank) 1 1 3324 E J Y CORP 3 2 1 3464 MARQUEZ HARVESTING INC 1 1 3687 P MARIN HARVESTING INC 2 2 3812 HILLS OF HOME FARMS 1 1 3813 GILLMOR FARMS INC 1 1 3836 J GUERRA LLC 1 1 3851 SEBRING CITRUS INC 1 1 4053 (blank) 1 1 4092 HARVESTING KINGS LLC 1 1 4101 ENDSLEY OAKS FARM INC 1 1 4305 S SANCHEZ HARVESTING INC 2 1 1 4355 KING FRESH TOMATOES INC 1 1 4393 HAGEN FARMS 1 1 4468 AMADO PALAFOX 1 1 4475 MARTINEZ & SONS TRUCKING LLC 4 2 2 4483 JESTER BEE CO 1 1 4519 VEL A DA INC 1 1 4550 OASIS HARVESTING INC 1 1 4682 (blank) 1 4768 CARRANZA FARMING LLC 1 1 4958 D/B/A FRANCO MEDINA HARVESTING 1 1 5090 (blank) 2 1 1 5261 MELON PRINCE 1 LLC 1 1 5314 TM HARVESTING INC 2 2 5373 DUNSON HARVESTING INC 4 3 1 5391 OSCAR GONZALEZ AND SONS HARVESTING 2 2 5450 ESTRADA & SON S INC 1 1 5673 GOMELLO LLC 8 4 4 5682 J HERNANDEZ HARVESTING INC 3 2 1 5683 AA HUAPILLA PRODUCE LLC 1 1 5859 DEL SUR HARVESTING LLC 4 2 2 5895 G III HARVESTING LLC 1 1 6163 JOHNSON HARVESTING INC 2 2 6255 MACIAS SVC GROUP 1 1 6306 EVERGLADES HARVEST & HAUL LLC 1 1 EVERGLADES HARVEST AND HAUL LLC 2 2 Number of I-129 Petitions for a Nonimmigrant Temporary Agricultural Worker (H-2A), by State and Case Status, April 1 - June 30, 2018 Petitions by State, Company, and FEIN (Last 4 Digits) Petitions by U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017
    Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 January 2017 Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 i Contents About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover art: Phil Smith, The Tauri Group (2017) Publication produced for FAA AST by The Tauri Group under contract. NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. ii Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 GENERAL CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction 5 Launch Vehicles 9 Launch and Reentry Sites 21 Payloads 35 2016 Launch Events 39 2017 Annual Commercial Space Transportation Forecast 45 Space Transportation Law and Policy 83 Appendices 89 Orbital Launch Vehicle Fact Sheets 100 iii Contents DETAILED CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .
    [Show full text]
  • Sale Price Drives Potential Effects on DOD and Commercial Launch Providers
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Addressees August 2017 SURPLUS MISSILE MOTORS Sale Price Drives Potential Effects on DOD and Commercial Launch Providers Accessible Version GAO-17-609 August 2017 SURPLUS MISSILE MOTORS Sale Price Drives Potential Effects on DOD and Commercial Launch Providers Highlights of GAO-17-609, a report to congressional addressees Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found The U.S. government spends over a The Department of Defense (DOD) could use several methods to set the sale billion dollars each year on launch prices of surplus intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) motors that could be activities as it strives to help develop a converted and used in vehicles for commercial launch if current rules prohibiting competitive market for space launches such sales were changed. One method would be to determine a breakeven and assure its access to space. Among price. Below this price, DOD would not recuperate its costs, and, above this others, one launch option is to use price, DOD would potentially save. GAO estimated that DOD could sell three vehicles derived from surplus ICBM Peacekeeper motors—the number required for one launch, or, a “motor set”—at motors such as those used on the Peacekeeper and Minuteman missiles. a breakeven price of about $8.36 million and two Minuteman II motors for about The Commercial Space Act of 1998 $3.96 million, as shown below. Other methods for determining motor prices, such prohibits the use of these motors for as fair market value as described in the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory commercial launches and limits their Board Handbook, resulted in stakeholder estimates ranging from $1.3 million per use in government launches in part to motor set to $11.2 million for a first stage Peacekeeper motor.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Launchers in a Pandemic World - 2021 Edition of the Annual Industry Survey
    SSC21- IV-07 Small Launchers in a Pandemic World - 2021 Edition of the Annual Industry Survey Carlos Niederstrasser Northrop Grumman Corporation 45101 Warp Drive, Dulles, VA 20166 USA; +1.703.406.5504 [email protected] ABSTRACT Even with the challenges posed by the world-wide COVID pandemic, small vehicle "Launch Fever" has not abated. In 2015 we first presented this survey at the AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites1, and we identified twenty small launch vehicles under development. By mid-2021 ten vehicles in this class were operational, 48 were identified under development, and a staggering 43 more were potential new entrants. Some are spurred by renewed government investment in space, such as what we see in the U.K. Others are new commercial entries from unexpected markets such as China. All are inspired by the success of SpaceX and the desire to capitalize on the perceived demand caused by the mega constellations. In this paper we present an overview of the small launch vehicles under development today. When available, we compare their capabilities, stated mission goals, cost and funding sources, and their publicized testing progress. We also review the growing number of entrants that have dropped out since we first started this report. Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, one system became operational in the past 12 months and two or three more systems hope to achieve their first successful launch in 2021. There is evidence that this could be the year when the small launch market finally becomes saturated; however, expectations continue to be high and many new entrants hope that there is room for more providers.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Space Debris Causes, Mitigations, and Issues Crosslink in THIS ISSUE Fall 2015 Vol
    ® CrosslinkThe Aerospace Corporation magazine of advances in aerospace technology Fall 2015 Understanding Space Debris Causes, Mitigations, and Issues Crosslink IN THIS ISSUE Fall 2015 Vol. 16 No. 1 2 Space Debris and The Aerospace Corporation Contents Ted Muelhaupt 2 FEATURE ARTICLES The state of space debris—myths, facts, and Aerospace's work in the 58 BOOKMARKS field. 60 BACK PAGE 4 A Space Debris Primer Roger Thompson Earth’s orbital environment is becoming increasingly crowded with debris, posing threats ranging from diminished capability to outright destruction of on-orbit assets. 8 Predicting the Future Space Debris Environment Alan Jenkin, Marlon Sorge, Glenn Peterson, John McVey, and Bernard Yoo The Aerospace Corporation’s ADEPT simulation is being used to On the cover: Mary Ellen Vojtek and Marlon Sorge assess the effectiveness of mitigation practices on reducing the future examine a recently created debris cloud using an orbital debris population. Aerospace visualization tool that displays cloud boundaries and density over time. In the days after an explosion or collision, the resulting debris cloud is at its most dense, presenting its biggest hazard to 14 First Responders in Space: The Debris Analysis operational satellites. Response Team Brian Hansen, Thomas Starchville, and Felix Hoots Visit the Crosslink website at Aerospace has been providing quick situational awareness to www.aerospace.org/publications/crosslink- government decision-makers concerned about the effects of magazine energetic space breakups. Copyright © 2015 The Aerospace Corporation. All rights re- served. Permission to copy or reprint is not required, but ap- propriate credit must be given to Crosslink and The Aerospace 22 Keeping Track: Space Surveillance for Operational Support Corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • SMALL SATELLITE LAUNCHERS Cancelled Concept Dormant In
    SMALL SATELLITE LAUNCHERS NewSpace Index 2020/03/09 Current status and time from development start to the first successful or planned orbital launch NEWSPACE.IM Northrop Grumman Pegasus 1990 Scorpius Space Launch Demi-Sprite ? Makeyev OKB Shtil 1998 Interorbital Systems NEPTUNE N1 ? SpaceX Falcon 1e 2008 Interstellar Technologies Zero 2021 MT Aerospace MTA, WARR, Daneo ? Rocket Lab Electron 2017 Nammo North Star 2020 CTA VLM 2020 Acrux Montenegro ? Frontier Astronautics ? ? Earth to Sky ? 2021 Zero 2 Infinity Bloostar ? CASIC / ExPace Fei Tian 1 / Kuaizhou-1A 2017 SpaceLS Prometheus-1 ? MISHAAL Aerospace M-OV ? CONAE Tronador II 2020 TLON Space Aventura I ? Rocketcrafters Intrepid-1 2020 ARCA Space Haas 2CA ? Aerojet Rocketdyne SPARK / Super Strypi 2015 Generation Orbit GoLauncher 2 ? PLD Space Miura 5 (Arion 2) 2021 Swiss Space Systems SOAR 2018 Heliaq ALV-2 ? Gilmour Space Eris-S 2021 Roketsan UFS 2023 Independence-X DNLV 2021 Beyond Earth ? ? Bagaveev Corporation Bagaveev ? Open Space Orbital Neutrino I ? LIA Aerospace Procyon 2026 JAXA SS-520-4 2017 Swedish Space Corporation Rainbow 2021 SpinLaunch ? 2022 Pipeline2Space ? ? Perigee Blue Whale 2020 Link Space New Line 1 2021 Lin Industrial Taymyr-1A ? Leaf Space Primo ? Firefly 2020 Exos Aerospace Jaguar ? Cubecab Cab-3A 2022 Celestia Aerospace Space Arrow CM ? bluShift Aerospace Red Dwarf 2022 Black Arrow Black Arrow 2 ? Tranquility Aerospace Devon Two ? Masterra Space MINSAT-2000 2021 LEO Launcher & Logistics ? ? ISRO SSLV (PSLV Light) 2020 Wagner Industries Konshu ? VSAT ? ? VALT
    [Show full text]
  • Air-Launch to Orbit
    Air-Launch to Orbit Stephen A. Muir ASEN 5053, The University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO 80909 This report details the current state of air-launch to orbit vehicles and what their capabilities are. It also touches on new systems and what development the future holds in this field. The air-launch to orbit market is primed to become the premier method of placing small satellites into orbit in a quick and cheap manner. The veritable explosion of cubesat and nanosat technology in the last decade will propel this niche market to the forefront of space launch systems. Nomenclature Isp = specific impulse USD = united states dollars ∆V = delta velocity I. Introduction HE cost to launch satellites into space has become exorbitant over the years. While the shuttle program was Tdeveloped with the idea that a launch each week and reusable boosters would drop the overall cost, this never materialized. Instead, the government watched while prices skyrocketed and as funding became scarce due to economic downturn, so did the launches. By the end of the shuttle program, the US government was shelling out an estimated $400M USD1. While, the return to more conventional rockets dropped this cost, it still remained high due to the lack of private investment in the field. Heavy launches aboard Delta IV and Atlas V rockets rose to prices between $150M and $200M USD1. Currently, if you have a high mass satellite or spacecraft, expect to pay plently of money to get it into orbit. As one might expect, the rise in cost has paralleled a massive push to miniaturize satellites.
    [Show full text]
  • On Sustainable Development Path of China Commercial Space
    On Sustainable Development Path of China Commercial Space By Mingxia Zhou Supervised by: Prof. Victor DOS SANTOS PAULINO A research project Submitted in partial fulfilment For the degree of Master of Business Administration In Aerospace Management At Toulouse Business School Toulouse, France 09 / 10 / 2018 Aerospace MBA 17-18 On Sustainable Development Path of China Commercial Space Abstract China’s commercial space companies have been nourished these years from 2014. But some people say most of them would die within 5 years when they used up all the money in the first round. But that’s just the beginning. China space needs them to survive and go on a sustainable development path then they can be a strong strength in China space and have their own position on the world space field. In this paper, I analyzed the American commercial space from 5 angles, policy, funding, infrastructure, innovation, and private funding. Then I compared the differences among new space in China, Europe, Russia, Japan, and India. The focus is on the comparison between China and American new space for I want to discover the wise methods adopted by the USA, the strong power in the world space. From doing it and combining the actual characteristics of China commercial space, I get down on exploring the path of Chinese commercial space sustainable development path. To develop a commercial space industry is never a simple thing, so I try to recommend the strategies in the short term and long term for developing new space path. Finally, I make the conclusion. we should do a lot in completing the whole supply chain of this industry and do more in promoting the product performance and satellite application.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Art Small Spacecraft Technology 2018
    NASA/TP—2018–220027 State of the Art Small Spacecraft Technology Small Spacecraft Systems Virtual Institute Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California Click here: Press F1 key (Windows) or Help key (Mac) for help December 2018 This page is required and contains approved text that cannot be changed. NASA STI Program ... in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. to the advancement of aeronautics and space Collected papers from scientific and science. The NASA scientific and technical technical conferences, symposia, seminars, information (STI) program plays a key part in or other meetings sponsored or helping NASA maintain this important role. co-sponsored by NASA. The NASA STI program operates under the SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, auspices of the Agency Chief Information Officer. technical, or historical information from It collects, organizes, provides for archiving, and NASA programs, projects, and missions, disseminates NASA’s STI. The NASA STI often concerned with subjects having program provides access to the NASA substantial public interest. Aeronautics and Space Database and its public interface, the NASA Technical Reports Server, TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. thus providing one of the largest collections of English-language translations of foreign aeronautical and space science STI in the world. scientific and technical material pertinent to Results are published in both non-NASA channels NASA’s mission. and by NASA in the NASA STI Report Series, which includes the following report types: Specialized services also include organizing and publishing research results, distributing TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of specialized research announcements and completed research or a major significant feeds, providing information desk and personal phase of research that present the results of search support, and enabling data exchange NASA Programs and include extensive data services.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Assessment for Spacex Falcon Launches at Kennedy Space Center and Cape Canaveral Air Force Station
    Draft Environmental Assessment for SpaceX Falcon Launches at Kennedy Space Center and Cape Canaveral Air Force Station February 2020 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Draft Environmental Assessment for SpaceX Falcon Launches at Kennedy Space Center and Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Brevard County, Florida AGENCIES: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), lead federal agency; National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and U.S. Air Force, cooperating agencies. This Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) is submitted for review pursuant to section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended (42 United States Code 4321, et seq.), Council on Environmental Quality NEPA-implementing regulations (40 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 1500 to 1508), and FAA Order 1050.1F, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION: SpaceX is applying to the FAA for launch licenses to launch the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy from Kennedy Space Center’s (KSC) Launch Complex 39A and Cape Canaveral Air Force Station’s (CCAFS) Launch Complex 40. SpaceX is also applying to the FAA for reentry licenses for Dragon reentry operations. The FAA’s proposal to issue licenses to SpaceX is considered a major federal action subject to environmental review under NEPA. Due to SpaceX’s ability to launch more frequently at KSC and CCAFS, SpaceX’s launch manifest includes more annual Falcon launches and Dragon reentries than were considered in previous NEPA analyses. Also, SpaceX
    [Show full text]
  • Ariane 5 Das „Zugpferd Für Schwere Lasten“
    Ariane 5 das „Zugpferd für schwere Lasten“ Walter Hohmann (1880 – 1945) trug mit seinen mathematischen Überlegungen zur „Erreichbarkeit der Him- melskörper“ wesentlich zur Entstehung der Raumfahrt bei. Zwischen Hohmanns grundlegenden Berechnungen und den heutigen modernen Raketen für die kommerzielle Nutzung liegt die Zeit des technologischen Wettrüstens der Supermächte im Kalten Krieg in den siebziger und achtziger Jahren des 20. Jahrhunderts. Seit dem Ende dieser Ära steht neben militärischen Überlegungen vor allem die zivile Nutzung des Alls im Mittelpunkt der internationalen Raumfahrt. Auf europäischer Ebene koordiniert die Europäische Weltraumorganisation (ESA) seit 1975 die Nutzung des Weltraums und gewährleistet insbesondere mit den Trägerraketen der Ariane-Familie den „freien autonomen Zugang zum Weltraum“. Am 24. Dezember 1979 startete die europäische Trägerrakete Ariane zum ersten Mal. Mittlerweile gehört die Ariane 5 zu den erfolgreichsten Trägersystemen der Welt. Astrium, ein Tochterunternehmen der EADS, ist seit 2003 Hauptauftragnehmer dieses Raketen-Typs. Die Ariane 5, wie hier im Modell aufgestellt, ist eine Trägerrakete mit neuer Technologie, die gleichzeitig zwei Satelliten mit einem Gesamtgewicht von 10 Tonnen befördern kann. Die Ariane-Raketen haben sich bereits auf mehr als 200 erfolgreichen Missionen bewährt. Der Astrium Standort Hardthausen-Lampoldshausen ist mit seinen Ferti- gungs- und Testanlagen wesentlich am Erfolg der Ariane beteiligt. Dank der Kooperation und Projektbegleitung von Astrium konnte mit der Ariane
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Optimization of a Small Reusable Launch Vehicle Using Vertical Landing Techniques Stephane Contant Delft University of Technology
    Design and Optimization of a Small Reusable Launch Vehicle Using Vertical Landing Techniques Stephane Contant Delft University of Technology Design and Optimization of a Small Reusable Launch Vehicle Using Vertical Landing Techniques by Stephane Contant to obtain the degree of Master of Science at the Delft University of Technology, to be defended publicly on Thursday, November 28, 2019 at 13:00. Student number: 4735676 Project duration: March 6, 2019 to November 28, 2019 Thesis committee: Ir. B.T.C. Zandbergen, TU Delft, Supervisor Prof.dr. E.K.A Gill, TU Delft Dr.ir. D. Dirkx, TU Delft This thesis is confidential and cannot be made public until November 28, 2019. An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. Cover image: Falcon 9 landing burn, credited to SpaceX. Abstract Recent years have seen a drastic increase in the number of small satellites launched per year, as these systems weighing less than 1000 kg have become a less expensive alternative to obtaining scientific data compared to satellites weighing multiple tons. However, one current drawback with these systems is their current price per kilogram to orbit, often reaching over $100k (2018) per kilogram for rideshare and cluster launches. Dedicated small satellite launch vehicles are a third solution to bringing small satellites to orbit that present potential reductions in price per kilogram. In parallel, reusability of the first stage of a launch vehicle using vertical landing techniques also presents the potential for further price per kilogram reductions. A baseline of $20.0k (2018) per kilogram to orbit is deemed as the benchmark for cost-effective solutions, as the current average reported price per kilogram of small launch vehicles totals $29.9k (2018).
    [Show full text]
  • The Light Launcher Landscape: a Compilation and Assessment of Publicly Available Data on Market, Competition and Financing
    69th International Astronautical Congress (IAC), Bremen, Germany, 1-5 October 2018. Copyright ©2018 by Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt. Published by the IAF with permission and released to the IAF to publish in all forms. IAC-18-D2.7.1 The Light Launcher Landscape: A Compilation and Assessment of Publicly Available Data on Market, Competition and Financing Holger Burkhardta aLauncher Department, Space Administration, German Aerospace Center, Königswinterer Str. 522-524, 53227 Bonn, Germany, [email protected] Abstract Light launch vehicles are currently a hot topic in the space transportation business. More than 100 light launcher development projects can be counted worldwide. Many seem to be still in a very preliminary phase of their development, while others have demonstrated substantial technology developments. Rocket Lab with its Electron launch vehicle is one of the few who already have successfully reached orbit. Common to most is the fact that these endeavors are exclusively or to a large degree privately funded. This paper will try to compile and assess publicly available data relevant to the light launcher market. First focus will be a short overview on the launch vehicle developments themselves. This is complemented by a high level view of the funding situation, or more specifically the inflow of investment capital. Last but not least, the market side is addressed. A first assessment focuses on the share of payloads compatible with light launchers within the global payload count. This is complemented by a compilation of market forecasts, evidencing the challenges and opportunities for light launchers. The paper is to a large extend based on an assessment of the calendar year 2017, while taking trends and evolutions within 2018 in due account where appropriate or where data is available.
    [Show full text]