From Eu Membership to the Eu-14 Sanction Measures 1995–2000

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

From Eu Membership to the Eu-14 Sanction Measures 1995–2000 715 VIII . FROM EU MEMBERSHIP TO THE EU-14 SANCTION MEASURES 1995–2000 1 . GENERAL INTRODUCTION: “EURO” AND EASTERN ENLARGEMENT ARE COMING – ASSUMPTION OF THE WESTERN EUROPEAN UNION TASKS The Treaty of Maastricht that was signed on February 7, 1992 provided a time- table for integration through the end of the twentieth century, while the Treaty of Amsterdam that was signed on October 2, 19971 attempted to introduce con- crete steps in order to bring the EU “closer to the citizens” and to strengthen the “ European identity” both within and from the outside. It started up where the fur- ther development of the treaty basis of the EC (the Single European Act, which en- tered into force in 1987, and Maastricht, which entered into force in 1993) had left off and continued on from there. The Treaty of Amsterdam included the Schengen Agreement (the removal of internal border controls with the strengthening of EU external borders) into the EU legal system and changed or supplemented the two main European union treaties (the ECSC and the EEC) as well as the Union Trea- ty of Maastricht upon which the Community construction was based. In addition, a “Stability Pact” at the Dublin Summit on December 13–14, 1996 was adopted for the adherence to the budgetary discipline in the European Monetary Union (EMU).2 Through this, it was possible to introduce the euro within the stipulated period of January 1, 1999. From that time forward, twelve states belonged to the euro zone (Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, and Spain introduced the euro as their official non-cash currency – Greece followed in 2000). The strengthening of social and employment policy and the creation of new jobs remained, however, a matter of concern that was only realized to a small degree. Through additional resolutions by subsequent Council meetings, smaller partial successes were achieved. The Three Pillar Model that was established in Maastricht remained as the structure: The first pillar comprised the supra- national dimension with the EU Treaty and the expanded areas (EMU, social 1 Michael GEHLER, Europa. Ideen – Institutionen – Vereinigung – Zusammenhalt, Reinbek/ Hamburg 2018, 382–385; on this chapter see documents 87–92 in the appendix „Documents“. 2 GEHLER, Europa, 418–421, 673–677. 716 VIII. From EU Membership to the EU-14 Sanction Measures 1995–2000 policy, employment, vocational training, etc.); the second pillar concerned the inter governmental Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), equipped with a High Representative, the former NATO Secretary General Javier Solana and the taking over of the “Petersberg Tasks” from the Western European Union (WEU) which, in addition to peacemaking measures, also comprising “tasks of combat forces”; the third pillar included the areas of justice and home affairs which, at the time, were still intergovernmental areas but which, in the wake of September 11, 2001, were subjected to tendencies of integration such as a Europe-wide arrest warrant and coordination with regard to the fight against terrorism.3 Amsterdam had already pointed the way for enlargement. On December 12, 1997, the European Council summit in Luxembourg began the accession pro- cess with the Northern European and Central and Eastern European Countries (CEEC) as well as Cyprus, which led on March 30, 1998 to negotiations with a first group of accession applicants (Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Es- tonia, and Slovenia). The European Council in Helsinki on December 10, 1999 decided to expand the negotiations to include a second group (Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Romania, and Slovakia), and these began on February 15, 2000. With a view towards the approaching enlargement, the statements from the Trea- ty of Amsterdam about the “increased cooperation” (“flexibility”) represented something new: opting out, which up until that point was regarded as an inte- gration policy “sin”, had now turned into a permissible alternative option. Thus, a paradigm shift in integration policy also took place and the United Kingdom’s long-time goal in Europe policy was achieved. Enlargement received a clear pri- ority over extension, or to put it a different way: enlargement proceeded more and more at the expense of deepening, and in fact the latter was thus made virtually impossible. After the introduction of the euro, great qualitative leaps in integra- tion could also hardly be expected any time soon.4 The Treaty of Amsterdam entered into force on May 1, 1999. At the Europe- an Council in Cologne in June 1999, resolutions were passed that would set the course for the strengthening of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) as well as a Common European Security and Defense Policy (CESDP) that was to create the preconditions for taking over the tasks of security and defense policy by the EU as a complement to NATO, which was to be brought about by taking over the tasks of the Western European Union (WEU) and the quasi-merger of the EU and the WEU.5 3 Ibid., 373–376, 382–385: 382. 4 Ibid., 473–492; on the Eastern Enlargement see beside document 87 also documents 90 and 91 in the appendix “Documents”. 5 On the foreign and security policy of the EU in the development from the European Political Co- operation (EPC), the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) to the Common European Security and Defence Policy (CESDP) see: Gernot STIMMER, Die Außenbeziehungen der EU. Politik, Ökonomie, Sicherheit, Kultur, Wien 2019, 68–85. 2. Cooperation in Institutions, but Limited Engagement 717 The EMU Stability Pact adopted in 1997 set a country’s budget deficit at 3% and its debt at 60% of the GDP. The Commission was able to check compliance and impose sanctions in the event of deviations. When Germany and France failed to comply with these criteria, the Commission only issued warnings, but the Commission stuck to the rule.6 2 . COOPERATION IN INSTITUTIONS, BUT LIMITED ENGAGEMENT The scope for shaping economic policy shifted more and more to the level of the Union. These possibilities remained largely closed to Austria. According to the economy historian Felix Butschek, this dimension remained “largely closed” to the country.7 Helmut Kramer correctly stated in this context: “The desire to actively participate in the European integration process played a secondary role, at least for economic policy considerations. It was not so much designing and supporting European solutions that motivated Austrian politics, but rather not being discriminated against in the pursuit of national interests.”8 Butschek reinforced this verdict. Austria‘s EU commitment was initially due to Mock and Vranitzky, which led to a positive referendum result: “In principle, the relationship of the Austrian population to the EU remained distanced to bro- ken. [...] The country’s activities were limited to technical cooperation, as it were, within the Commission’s administrative apparatus. Political initiatives almost exclusively concerned the representation of – supposedly – national interests.”9 How can we analyze and judge the relationship Austria-EU at the very early stages of its membership? In a first phase, Austria strove to implement a policy 6 GEHLER, Europa, 367, 382, especially 455–456, 886. 7 On EU accession and EU policy see Felix BUTSCHEK, Vom Staatsvertrag zur EU. Öster- reichische Wirtschaftsgeschichte von 1955 bis zur Gegenwart, Wien – Köln – Weimar 2004, 135–143: 142. 8 Helmut KRAMER, Österreichs Wirtschaftspolitik im Rahmen der EU, in: Heinrich NEIS- SER – Sonja PUNTSCHER-RIEKMANN (Hrsg.), Europäisierung der österreichischen Po- litik. Konsequenzen der Mitgliedschaft, Wien 2002, 267–294: 275; for the weakening of a pro- active political approach in Austria’s EU policy see IDEM, Austrian Foreign Policy 1995– 2015, in: Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 45 (July 2016), 2, 49–57: 51–53; also: IDEM, Plädoyer für eine Reaktivierung der Außen- und Neutralitätspolitik Österreichs, in: Thomas ROITHNER – Ursula GAMAUF (Hrsg.), Am Anfang war die Vision vom Frieden. Weg weiser in eine Zukunft jenseits von Gewalt und Krieg. Festschrift zum 90. Geburtstag von Gerald MADER, Wien 2016, 343–356. 9 BUTSCHEK, Vom Staatsvertrag zur EU, 142, see also Anton PELINKA, Innenansicht: Rol- lenbild und Rollenwahrnehmung Österreichs als Akteur in der EU, in: Heinrich NEISSER – Sonja PUNTSCHER-RIEKMANN (Hrsg.), Europäisierung der österreichischen Politik. Konsequenzen der Mitgliedschaft, Wien 2002, 17–36; Peter A. ULRAM, Einstellung der Ös- terreicher zur EU, in: NEISSER – PUNTSCHER-RIEKMANN (Hrsg.), Europäisierung der österreichischen Politik, 65–79. 718 VIII. From EU Membership to the EU-14 Sanction Measures 1995–2000 of adaptation to the union’s structure and adoption of the community’s rules of the game (1995–99). The government had assumed roles and responsibilities for nominating and appointing functional staff. The former Agricultural Minister Franz Fischler (1989–1994) (ÖVP) became a member of the European Commis- sion, responsible for agricultural matters (1999–2004) and later on also for fishery policies (2004–2009).10 In addition, twenty-one Austrians assumed responsibilities as elected mem- bers in the European Parliament. But when it came to civil service positions, they had a deficit, compared to other candidates for accession. In the Translation Centre, it was not easy for candidates to get hired because the department respon- sible for German was already staffed by Germans. While there were 112 Finns and 99 Swedes,
Recommended publications
  • Außenpolitischer Bericht 2007 Jahrbuch Der Österreichischen Außenpolitik U2 U3:U2 U3.Qxd 30.07.2008 11:56 Seite 1
    III-351-BR/2008 der Beilagen - Bericht - Hauptdokument 1 von 485 Außenpolitischer Bericht 2007 Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Außenpolitik U2_U3:U2_U3.qxd 30.07.2008 11:56 Seite 1 2 von 485 III-351-BR/2008 der Beilagen - Bericht - Hauptdokument Bundesministerium für europäische und internationale Angelegenheiten Minoritenplatz 8 A-1014 Wien Telefon: während der Bürozeiten an Werktagen in der Zeit von 9 bis 17 Uhr: 0 50 11 50-0 / int.: +43 50 11 50-0 kostenfreies Anrufservice: (0800) 234 888 (aus dem Ausland nicht wählbar) Fax: 0 50 11 59-0 / int.: +43 50 11 59-0 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.bmeia.gv.at Bürgerservice: In dringenden Notfällen im Ausland ist das Bürgerservice rund um die Uhr erreichbar: Telefon: 0 50 11 50-4411 / int.: +43 50 11 50-4411 alternativ: (01) 90 115-4411 / int.: +43 1 90 115-4411 Fax: 0 50 11 59-4411 / int.: +43 50 11 59-4411 alternativ: 0 50 11 59-245 / int.: +43 1 50 11 59-245 E-Mail: [email protected] Die Möglichkeiten zur Hilfeleistung an ÖsterreicherInnen im Ausland sind auf der Homepage des Bundesministeriums für europäische und internatio- nale Angelegenheiten www.bmeia.gv.at unter dem Punkt „Bürgerservice“ ausführlich dargestellt. III-351-BR/2008 der Beilagen - Bericht - Hauptdokument 3 von 485 Vorwort Außenpolitischer Bericht 2007 Bericht der Bundesministerin für europäische und internationale Angelegenheiten I 4 von 485 III-351-BR/2008 der Beilagen - Bericht - Hauptdokument Vorwort Medieninhaber und Herausgeber: Bundesministerium für europäische und internationale Angelegenheiten Minoritenplatz 8, 1014 Wien Gesamtredaktion und Koordination: Ges. MMag.
    [Show full text]
  • From the History of Polish-Austrian Diplomacy in the 1970S
    PRZEGLĄD ZACHODNI I, 2017 AGNIESZKA KISZTELIŃSKA-WĘGRZYŃSKA Łódź FROM THE HISTORY OF POLISH-AUSTRIAN DIPLOMACY IN THE 1970S. AUSTRIAN CHANCELLOR BRUNO KREISKY’S VISITS TO POLAND Polish-Austrian relations after World War II developed in an atmosphere of mutu- al interest and restrained political support. During the Cold War, the Polish People’s Republic and the Republic of Austria were on the opposite sides of the Iron Curtain; however, after 1945 both countries sought mutual recognition and trade cooperation. For more than 10 years following the establishment of diplomatic relations between Austria and Poland, there had been no meetings at the highest level.1 The first con- tact took place when the then Minister of Foreign Affairs, Bruno Kreisky, came on a visit to Warsaw on 1-3 March 1960.2 Later on, Kreisky visited Poland four times as Chancellor of Austria: in June 1973, in late January/early February 1975, in Sep- tember 1976, and in November 1979. While discussing the significance of those five visits, it is worth reflecting on the role of Austria in the diplomatic activity of the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA). The views on the motives of the Austrian politician’s actions and on Austria’s foreign policy towards Poland come from the MFA archives from 1972-1980. The time period covered in this study matches the schedule of the Chancellor’s visits. The activity of the Polish diplomacy in the Communist period (1945-1989) has been addressed as a research topic in several publications on Polish history. How- ever, as Andrzej Paczkowski says in the sixth volume of Historia dyplomacji polskiej (A history of Polish diplomacy), research on this topic is still in its infancy.3 A wide range of source materials that need to be thoroughly reviewed offer a number of 1 Stosunki dyplomatyczne Polski, Informator, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Las Consecuencias De La Primera Guerra Mundial: El Paradigma De Checoslovaquia
    9 5 Las consecuencias de la Primera Guerra Mundial: el paradigma de Checoslovaquia The consequences of the First World War: Czechoslovakia’s paradigm Carlos Puente Martín* Resumen La Gran Guerra no fue la primera guerra europea de carácter mundial, pues en los siglos anteriores también se produjeron enfrentamientos entre potencias europeas cuyos escenarios bélicos tuvieron lugar en varios continentes. La particularidad de la Primera Guerra Mundial, y este es el objetivo del artículo, son las consecuencias que afectaron al equilibrio político en Europa, establecido en el Congreso de Viena tras las guerras napoleónicas, con la desaparición de cuatro imperios, el nacimiento de varios Estados en Europa Central, el fortalecimiento de la hegemonía de Estados Unidos y, por primera vez en la historia, la aparición de la ideología comunista en un Estado, que rompía con las normas establecidas. Por iniciativa del presidente Wilson, se establecería el sistema de seguridad de la Sociedad de Naciones, a la que Estados Unidos, paradójicamente, no pertenecería. No se examinan los actos militares que tuvieron lugar durante la contienda, utilizando revolucionarios medios de destrucción, ni tampoco el estudio de todos los acontecimientos políticos, sino analizar las causas de la guerra como objetivo que se plasmó en el Tratado de Versalles de 1919 y otros tratados asociados. Se quiere deducir, acudiendo a textos legales y relatos históricos, que los fines de la guerra estaban ya predeterminados. Fue una guerra de venganzas y reivindicaciones que traían causa en las guerras de Napoleón y en la Guerra Franco-Prusiana de 1871. Una consecuencia deseada era la desaparición del Imperio austro-húngaro y el establecimiento de un cordón sanitario en torno a la nueva ideología establecida en Rusia.
    [Show full text]
  • Sovereign Wealth Funds: Their Operation and the Economic, Political and Legal Responses
    Sovereign Wealth Funds: Their Operation and the Economic, Political and Legal Responses Georges Kratsas UCL PhD I, Georges Kratsas, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 1 Abstract Abstract This thesis deals with the investment behaviour of government-led investment vehicles, widely known as Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs), and the implications that arise from their investments in Europe and the western world. In the last 10 to 15 years SWFs have grown in size and number and have drawn the attention of many government officials because of their non- transparent nature and their expansionary investment policies. Although SWFs have been a valuable source of foreign investment in the past, their non- transparent nature, combined with their government-controlled status, raises fears that their investments might be politically, rather than economically, motivated. Specific examples of those concerns are the risk that SWFs use their economic influence in order to obtain critical information, to transfer Jobs abroad or compromise the operation of strategically important companies such as telecommunications or energy companies. The above concerns have led many western governments to take active measure to regulate sovereign investors. Such regulation comes in the form of legislation establishing procedures to control the impact of their investments. Additionally, various forms of regulation have been established at the international level, through the adoption of Codes of Conduct. The main case studies used in this thesis are those of France, Germany, the USA as well as instruments promulgated by international bodies, such as the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, the International Monetary Fund and the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Außen- Und Europapolitischer Bericht 2019 Bericht Des Bundesministers Für Europäische Und Internationale Angelegenheiten
    III-150 der Beilagen XXVII. GP - Bericht - 02 Hauptdokument 1 von 270 Außen- und Europapolitischer Bericht 2019 Bericht des Bundesministers für europäische und internationale Angelegenheiten www.parlament.gv.at 2 von 270 III-150 der Beilagen XXVII. GP - Bericht - 02 Hauptdokument www.parlament.gv.at III-150 der Beilagen XXVII. GP - Bericht - 02 Hauptdokument 3 von 270 Außen- und Europapolitischer Bericht 2019 Bericht des Bundesministers für europäische und internationale Angelegenheiten www.parlament.gv.at 4 von 270 III-150 der Beilagen XXVII. GP - Bericht - 02 Hauptdokument Medieninhaber und Herausgeber: Bundesministerium für europäische und internationale Angelegenheiten Minoritenplatz 8, 1010 Wien Gedruckte Auflage: ISBN 978-3-902965-22-6 Epub: ISBN 978-3-902965-23-3 Gesamtredaktion und Koordination: LR Dr. Johannes Strasser Natalie Raidl, MA Gesamtherstellung: Druckerei Berger, 3580 Horn www.parlament.gv.at III-150 der Beilagen XXVII. GP - Bericht - 02 Hauptdokument 5 von 270 Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Europa und Europäische Union ............................................................... 1 1.1 Europäische Union ......................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Österreich in den Europäischen Institutionen und Ständige Vertretung Österreichs bei der Europäischen Union ................. 1 1.1.2 Die Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik der Europäischen Union .... 6 1.1.2.1 GASP ........................................................................................... 6 1.1.2.2 GSVP ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Az Európai Integráció Politikai Története
    J. Nagy László AZ EURÓPAI INTEGRÁCIÓ POLITIKAI TÖRTÉNETE SZEGED 2005 © J. Nagy László 3., b ővített, javított kiadás TARTALOM BEVEZET Ő........................................................................................................................ AZ EURÓPA-ESZME A TÖRTÉNELEMBEN................................................................. PÁNEURÓPA-ESZME ÉS TERV A KÉT VILÁGHÁBORÚ KÖZÖTT...................... I. dokumentum: Richard Coudenhov-Kalergi Páneuropa eszméje................. II. dokumentum: A magyar páneurópa-mozgalom elvei A MODERN EURÓPA KIALAKULÁSÁNAK NÉHÁNY JELLEMZ ŐJE............... INTEGRÁCIÓS TÖREKVÉSEK ÉS EREDMÉNYEK (1945-1957).................... Európa újjáépítése, az integrációs folyamat kezdete................................................. A Schuman terv, (Nyugat) Németország integrációja............................................... A Montánuniótól a Római szerz ődésig............................................................................ III. dokumentum: Az 1950. május 9-i nyilatkozat (A Schuman- terv) IV. dokumentum: Az Európai Gazdasági Közösség létrehozása (1957) A KÖZÖS PIACTÓL AZ EURÓPAI UNIÓIG (1958-1992).................................................... Gazdasági sikerek, politikai nehézségek: a Hatok id őszaka................................................. Az északi kib ővülés: Nagy-Britannia csatlakozása.......................................................... Franciaország Európa politikája az 1960-as években........................................................ Lendületben az
    [Show full text]
  • Spotlight Europe # 2009/08 – September 2009 Europe Begins at Home
    spotlight europe # 2009/08 – September 2009 Europe begins at home Joachim Fritz-Vannahme Bertelsmann Stiftung, [email protected] The European policy of the forthcoming German government is bound to change, partly as a result of the new institutional framework. On the one hand there is the ruling of the German Constitutional Court. And on the other hand it will become necessary to play by the EU’s new rules of the game. Can Germany continue to support the trend to more European in- tegration and, more importantly, will it have a desire to do so? Whoever becomes the next Chancellor of I Germany will have to get used to new rules of the game in the area of European policy. They have been determined in two The Ruling in Karlsruhe – different ways. On the one hand the ruling Criticism and Praise of the German Constitutional Court on the Treaty of Lisbon redistributes the tasks The Karlsruhe ruling on 30 June 2009 led assigned to various German institutions. to fierce disputes in Germany and else- # 2009/08 And on the other hand the Treaty itself–if, where among those who sought to that is, the Irish give their assent to it on elucidate its meaning. Writing in the 02 October, for otherwise there will be a weekly newspaper “Die Zeit,” former need for crisis management for years to foreign minister Joschka Fischer criticized come–will change the distribution of the fact that it placed “national power in Brussels, partly on account of the constraints” on European integration. creation of new posts ranging from the “Karlsruhe simply does not like the EU’s permanent President of the European progress towards deeper integration,” Council to the EU foreign policy represen- writes Fischer.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Election in Germany 30Th June 2010
    GERMANY European Elections monitor Presidential Election in Germany 30th June 2010 Christian Wulff, the new German President RESULTS The victory achieved by Christian Wulff, the candidate who stood for the government coalition led by Chancellor Angela Merkel that rallies the Christian Democratic Union (CDU/CSU) and the Liberal Democratic Party (FDP), can be said to be “minor” as he won the German Presidential election that took place on 30th June. Christian Wulff was elected after a 3rd round of vo- Hence it was in the 3rd round when a simple majority ting with 625 votes out of the 1,244 delegates at the was sufficient to be elected and after Lukrezia Jochim- German Federal Assembly (Bundesversammlung) sen withdrew that Christian Wulff was appointed to that brings together the 612 members of the Bundes- succeed Horst Köhler (Head of State who resigned on tag, the lower Chamber of Parliament and an equal 31st May last) as head of Germany. number of representatives from the 16 Länder, MPs from the regional Parliaments and personalities from 52 year old Christian Wulff is a law graduate from the civil society. The Social Democratic Party (SPD) and University of Osnabrück and was a lawyer before de- Greens candidate, Joachim Gauck won 494 votes. voting his career to politics. A CDU member since he 121 delegates, notably from the Left Party (Die Linke) was 19 he became the leader of the “youth” branch of abstained. the CDU in his Land of Lower Saxony in 1983 before joining the CDU’s regional management committee two Although on paper the government coalition had a 21 years later.
    [Show full text]
  • What Does GERMANY Think About Europe?
    WHat doEs GERMaNY tHiNk aboUt europE? Edited by Ulrike Guérot and Jacqueline Hénard aboUt ECFR The European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) is the first pan-European think-tank. Launched in October 2007, its objective is to conduct research and promote informed debate across Europe on the development of coherent, effective and values-based European foreign policy. ECFR has developed a strategy with three distinctive elements that define its activities: •a pan-European Council. ECFR has brought together a distinguished Council of over one hundred Members - politicians, decision makers, thinkers and business people from the EU’s member states and candidate countries - which meets once a year as a full body. Through geographical and thematic task forces, members provide ECFR staff with advice and feedback on policy ideas and help with ECFR’s activities within their own countries. The Council is chaired by Martti Ahtisaari, Joschka Fischer and Mabel van Oranje. • a physical presence in the main EU member states. ECFR, uniquely among European think-tanks, has offices in Berlin, London, Madrid, Paris, Rome and Sofia. In the future ECFR plans to open offices in Warsaw and Brussels. Our offices are platforms for research, debate, advocacy and communications. • a distinctive research and policy development process. ECFR has brought together a team of distinguished researchers and practitioners from all over Europe to advance its objectives through innovative projects with a pan-European focus. ECFR’s activities include primary research, publication of policy reports, private meetings and public debates, ‘friends of ECFR’ gatherings in EU capitals and outreach to strategic media outlets.
    [Show full text]
  • Building an Unwanted Nation: the Anglo-American Partnership and Austrian Proponents of a Separate Nationhood, 1918-1934
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Carolina Digital Repository BUILDING AN UNWANTED NATION: THE ANGLO-AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP AND AUSTRIAN PROPONENTS OF A SEPARATE NATIONHOOD, 1918-1934 Kevin Mason A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of PhD in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2007 Approved by: Advisor: Dr. Christopher Browning Reader: Dr. Konrad Jarausch Reader: Dr. Lloyd Kramer Reader: Dr. Michael Hunt Reader: Dr. Terence McIntosh ©2007 Kevin Mason ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Kevin Mason: Building an Unwanted Nation: The Anglo-American Partnership and Austrian Proponents of a Separate Nationhood, 1918-1934 (Under the direction of Dr. Christopher Browning) This project focuses on American and British economic, diplomatic, and cultural ties with Austria, and particularly with internal proponents of Austrian independence. Primarily through loans to build up the economy and diplomatic pressure, the United States and Great Britain helped to maintain an independent Austrian state and prevent an Anschluss or union with Germany from 1918 to 1934. In addition, this study examines the minority of Austrians who opposed an Anschluss . The three main groups of Austrians that supported independence were the Christian Social Party, monarchists, and some industries and industrialists. These Austrian nationalists cooperated with the Americans and British in sustaining an unwilling Austrian nation. Ultimately, the global depression weakened American and British capacity to practice dollar and pound diplomacy, and the popular appeal of Hitler combined with Nazi Germany’s aggression led to the realization of the Anschluss .
    [Show full text]
  • Die KPÖ in Der Konzentrationsregierung 1945–1947: Energieminister Karl Altmann WINFRIED R
    12. Jg. / Nr. 3 ALFRED KLAHR GESELLSCHAFT September 2005 MITTEILUNGEN Preis: 1,1– Euro Die KPÖ in der Konzentrationsregierung 1945–1947: Energieminister Karl Altmann WINFRIED R. GARSCHA er im „Österreich-Lexikon“ war – und hier ist den Autoren der Par- Das, was über die Kenntnis einer bis- nach Karl Altmann sucht, fin- teigeschichte zuzustimmen – der Ab- lang unbekannten Facette der öster- Wdet einen dreieinhalbzeilige schluss einer Entwicklung, die bereits reichischen Nachkriegsgeschichte hinaus Eintrag mit den Geburts- und Sterbeda- mit der Ersetzung der kommunistischen am Wirken Altmanns als Energiemini- ten, dem Berufstitel (Obersenatsrat der durch ehemalige Nazi-Polizisten ab dem ster von Interesse ist, bezieht sich vor al- Gemeinde Wien) und der Mitteilung, Frühjahr 1947 in größerem Umfang be- lem auf die Bedingungen, unter denen er dass der KPÖ-Politiker 1945–47 Bun- gonnen hatte und ihren Höhepunkt mit kommunistische Politik betrieb: In einer desminister für Elektrifizierung und En- der Abberufung des kommunistischen absoluten Minderheitsposition als einzi- ergiewirtschaft gewesen sei.1 Leiters des staatspolizeilichen Büros der ger Minister seiner Partei in einer Regie- Auf den immerhin fast 600 Seiten der Bundespolizeidirektion Wien, Heinrich rung, deren übrige Mitglieder in ihm eine KPÖ-Geschichte2 wird Karl Altmann Dürmayer, im September 1947 erreicht Art Agenten der sowjetischen Besat- ganze zwei Mal kurz erwähnt. Einmal im hatte. Der internationale Bezug war der zungsmacht erblickten (was mit ihrem Zusammenhang mit seiner Entsendung 1947 voll ausbrechende Kalte Krieg, in eigenen Selbstverständnis als bedin- in die Bundesregierung als KPÖ-Mini- ganz Nord-, West- und Südeuropa wur- gungslose Parteigänger des „Westens“ ster, der der Partei eine „Kontrollmög- den kommunistische Minister aus den korrelierte), mit einem Beamtenapparat, lichkeit über die Regierungspolitik“ si- Regierungen gedrängt (übrigens viele der – von ganz wenigen, durch ihn selbst chern sollte (S.
    [Show full text]
  • La Historia Del Balonmano En Chile
    Universidad de Chile Instituto de la Comunicación e Imagen Escuela de Periodismo LA HISTORIA DEL BALONMANO EN CHILE MEMORIA PARA OPTAR AL TITULO DE PERIODISTA INGA SILKE FEUCHTMANN PÉREZ PROFESOR GUÍA: EDUARDO SANTA CRUZ ACHURRA Santiago, Enero de 2014 Tabla de Contenidos FUNDAMENTACIÓN 1 I. PLANTEAMIENTO DEL PROBLEMA 7 1. Problema 7 2. Objetivo Principal 7 3. Objetivos Específicos 7 4. Propósito 8 CAPITULO I MARCO CONCEPTUAL 9 I. QUÉ ES EL DEPORTE 9 1. Etimología de la palabra deporte 9 2. Definición de deporte 11 3. Historia y desarrollo del deporte 15 4. Los deportes colectivos: el balonmano 21 II. EL BALONMANO 23 1. Uso del vocablo balonmano 23 2. La naturaleza del juego 24 3. Historia del balonmano en el mundo 29 4. Estructura internacional del balonmano 36 5. Organización Panamericana 39 ii III. TRATAMIENTO DEL DEPORTE EN CHILE 45 1. Cómo se comprende el deporte en Chile 45 2. Institucionalidad deportiva en Chile 50 IV. MEDIOS DE COMUNICACIÓN DEPORTIVOS 54 1. Su relación con el balonmano 54 CAPITULO II PRIMERA ETAPA (1965-1973) 59 I. ORIGEN DEL BALONMANO EN CHILE 59 1. Los difusos y desconocidos comienzos del balonmano 59 2. La influencia alemana 61 3. De las colonias a la masificación 67 II. LOS PRIMEROS PASOS DE LA ORGANIZACIÓN NACIONAL 71 1. ¿Quién fue Pablo Botka, cuál era su plan? 71 2. El Estado y su apoyo al proyecto Botka 75 3. La experiencia escolar con el balonmano 80 III. MEDIOS DE COMUNICACIÓN 84 1. El deporte que se conoce como hándbol 84 iii CAPITULO III SEGUNDA ETAPA (1975-1990) 87 I.
    [Show full text]