Map of All Controlled Parking Zones (Pdf 1.5MB)
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Hammersmith and Fulham by FCMS
Hammersmith and Fulham by FCMS Fire Risk Assessment of: 112-126 Walham Green Court Cedarne Rd Fulham London SW6 2DE Author of Assessment: M Richards GIFireE Quality Assured by: Yvonne Topping, Project Manager Responsible Person: Named person within the organisation, Richard Buckley Risk Assessment Valid From: 28/10/2020 Risk Assessment Valid To: 28/10/2022 Page: 1 of 12 Hammersmith and Fulham by FCMS Building Features Approximate Square Area of the Building: 400 Number of Dwellings: 15 Number of Internal Communal Stairs: 1 Number of External Escape Stairs: 2 Number of Final Exits: 2 Number of Storeys 7 Is there a Basement Present? Yes Is Gas Installed to Building? yes Are Solar Panels Installed on Building? no Number of Occupants: 45 Current Evacuation Policy: Stay Put Procedure Recommended Evacuation Policy: Stay Put Procedure Last LFB Inspection: Page: 2 of 12 Hammersmith and Fulham by FCMS Survey Findings: Building Construction & Purpose built medium rise block of brick on reinforced concrete forming part of Layout: the Walham Green development. The block is square of ground plus 6 upper levels and a flat roof. It has a single stair core and enclosed protected stair approach to the dwellings with one passenger lift opening into the accommodation area at each level between level 2 and 6. 3 flats per level to floors 3-6, 2 flats at level 2 and one at level 1. Also at ground level is the rear exit from the stair. Two separate retail units and undercroft car park entrance are also found at ground floor level which have no openings into the residential block. -
Map of the Bishops Park Conservation Area
73 9 8 6 9 3 9 4 Churc 4 5 Bakery 7 5 T 7 19 23 41 8 Wharf 22 7 59 7 E D 9 4 10 446 23 1 60 E 7 39 45 A 1 7 2 444 R 2 43 O a 4 T 10 4 1 R 4 Em 9 El to 1 7 7 0 S D 5 L A f Sub Sta 4 Exchang O 8 0 T 7 ploy F 2 11 2 SE N ing Y c Centre 4 62 5 A W 3 o L 20 202 1 2 3 18 8 A earn t 51 T ment 103 1 A a 36 70 AD Produced by Highways & Engineering 40 e The Coda 13 241 Kingwood L 7 175 BSI ILLSHOTT CLO 24 M 1 120 0 17 1 Resource Centre a 5 OD RO 4 t 11 a to e 5 3 O S on the Land Survey Mapping System. 5 49 W 35 40 0 3 6 D 5 K 3 4 8 196 7 1 El Sub 37 D 25 KING 4 A 11 1 1 6 O S ROA This drawing is Copyright. 1 10 R to MILLSHOTT 127 to 133 to 127 s OP 1 T 1 er r 13 S e 30 R 30 34 R ilm b 1 ta 2 U F m s BISH 1 to 4 to 1 M 15 H a 69 92 S N h 8 5 b D u A R C 3 E 2 0 SQUARE 167 E R 60 2 8 7 1 F nce 1 l S R 3 4 6 Henry 2 G E E e 3 67 Y 5 3 4 7 74 4 ET A 5 3 R 8 15 I Compton Secondary 15 S T 24 E 13 Tennis T D TRE 3 ery School 3 S 0 to esid N 10 Court This map is reproduced from Ordnance O Surg 7 C Y 142 3 ROA 7 L 184 4 EN 38 O K 42 8 Survey material with the permission of the FS 32265 25 SE 28 31 ER ster R AD 20 ry 47 2 O n 23 94 26 0 59 e ton un 7 ILM p to 6 8 C 9 D R H Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Wharf 4 2 l 34 115 9 O m o F 0 LO 113 7 1 157 M o o 5 1 O W C ch W 6 S 2 N 48 United G 6 IN 4 M Her Majesty's Stationery Office. -
Hammersmith & Fulham Council
June 2020 Summary Report The full report and detailed maps: www.consultation.lgbce.org.uk www.lgbce.org.uk Our Recommendations Hammersmith & Fulham The table lists all the wards we are proposing as part of our final recommendations along with the number of voters in each ward. The table also shows the electoral variances for each of the proposed wards which tells you how we have delivered electoral equality. Finally, the table includes electorate projections for 2025 so you Council can see the impact of the recommendations for the future. Final Recommendations on the new electoral arrangements Ward Name Number of Electorate Number of Variance Electorate Number of Variance (2019) electors per from (2025) electors per from councillor average councillor average (%) (%) Addison 2 5,681 2,841 12% 5,936 2,968 5% Avonmore 2 5,315 2,658 5% 5,576 2,788 -1% Brook Green 2 5,811 2,906 15% 6,102 3,051 8% College Park & 3 5,855 1,952 -23% 8,881 2,960 5% Old Oak Coningham 3 7,779 2,593 2% 8,052 2,684 -5% Fulham Reach 3 8,359 2,786 10% 8,847 2,949 4% Fulham Town 2 5,312 2,656 5% 5,558 2,779 -2% Grove 2 5,193 2,597 3% 5,452 2,726 -3% Hammersmith 2 5,188 2,594 2% 5,468 2,734 -3% Broadway Who we are Why Hammersmith & Fulham? Lillie 2 4,695 2,348 -7% 5,619 2,810 0% ● The Local Government Boundary Commission ● The Commission has a legal duty to carry out an Munster 3 8,734 2,911 15% 9,027 3,009 7% for England is an independent body set up by electoral review of each council in England ‘from Palace & 3 8,181 2,727 8% 8,768 2,923 4% Parliament. -
Buses from Fulham Broadway
Buses from Fulham Broadway 295 28 414 14 11 N11 Green Park towards Ladbroke Grove Sainsbury’s Shepherd’s Bush towards Kensal Rise Notting towards Maida Hill towards towards towards for Westeld from stops A, F, H Hill Gate Chippenham Road/ Russell Square Liverpool Street Liverpool Street from stops C, D, F, H Shirland Road Appold Street Appold Street from stops E, L, U, V N28 from stops E, L, U, V from stop R from stops B, E, J, R towards Camden Town Kensington Park Lane 211 Hyde Park Victoria SHEPHERD’S from stops A, F, H Church Street Corner towards High Street Waterloo BUSH Kensington Knightsbridge from stops B, E, J, L, U, V Harrods Buses from295 Fulham Broadway Victoria Coach Station Shepherd’s Bush Road KENSINGTON Brompton Road 306 HAMMERSMITH towards Acton Vale Hammersmith Library 28 N28 Victoria & Albert from stops A, F, H Museum Hammersmith Kensington 14 414 High Street 11 211 N11 295 Kings Mall 28 414 14 South Kensington 11 N11 Kensington Olympia Green Park Sloane Square towards Ladbroke GroveShopping Sainsbury’s Centre HammersmithShepherd’s Bush towards Kensal Rise Notting towards Maida Hill for Natural Historytowards and towards towards Busfor West Stationeld 306 from stops A, F, H Hill Gate Chippenham Road/ ScienceRussell Museums Square Liverpool Street Liverpool Street from stops C, D, F, H Shirland Road Appold Street Appold Street Hammersmith from stops E, L, U, V Hammersmith 211 Road N28 from stops E, L, U, V from stop R from stops B, E, J, R Town Hall from stops C, D, F, M, W towards Camden Town Park Lane 306 Kensington -
The Park Keeper
The Park Keeper 1 ‘Most of us remember the park keeper of the past. More often than not a man, uniformed, close to retirement age, and – in the mind’s eye at least – carrying a pointed stick for collecting litter. It is almost impossible to find such an individual ...over the last twenty years or so, these individuals have disappeared from our parks and in many circumstances their role has not been replaced.’ [Nick Burton1] CONTENTS training as key factors in any parks rebirth. Despite a consensus that the old-fashioned park keeper and his Overview 2 authoritarian ‘keep off the grass’ image were out of place A note on nomenclature 4 in the 21st century, the matter of his disappearance crept back constantly in discussions.The press have published The work of the park keeper 5 articles4, 5, 6 highlighting the need for safer public open Park keepers and gardening skills 6 spaces, and in particular for a rebirth of the park keeper’s role. The provision of park-keeping services 7 English Heritage, as the government’s advisor on the Uniforms 8 historic environment, has joined forces with other agencies Wages and status 9 to research the skills shortage in public parks.These efforts Staffing levels at London parks 10 have contributed to the government’s ‘Cleaner, Safer, Greener’ agenda,7 with its emphasis on tackling crime and The park keeper and the community 12 safety, vandalism and graffiti, litter, dog fouling and related issues, and on broader targets such as the enhancement of children’s access to culture and sport in our parks The demise of the park keeper 13 and green spaces. -
Earl's Court and West Kensington Opportunity Area
Earl’s Court and West Kensington Opportunity Area - Ecological Aspirations September 2010 www.rbkc.gov.uk www.lbhf.gov.uk Contents Site Description..................................................................................................................... 1 Holland Park (M131).......................................................................................................... 1 West London and District Line (BI 2) ................................................................................. 4 Brompton Cemetery (BI 3)................................................................................................. 4 Kings College (L8)............................................................................................................. 5 The River Thames and tidal tributaries (M031) .................................................................. 5 St Paul's Open Space (H&FL08) ....................................................................................... 5 Hammersmith Cemetery (H&FL09) ................................................................................... 6 Normand Park (H&FL11)................................................................................................... 6 Eel Brook Common (H&FL13) ........................................................................................... 7 British Gas Pond (H&FBI05).............................................................................................. 7 District line north of Fulham Broadway (H&FBI07G)......................................................... -
Lillie Enclave” Fulham
Draft London Plan Consultation: ref. Chapter 7 Heritage - Neglect & Destruction February 2018 The “Lillie Enclave” Fulham Within a quarter mile radius of Lillie Bridge, by West Brompton station is A microcosm of the Industrial Revolution - A part of London’s forgotten heritage The enclave runs from Lillie Bridge along Lillie Road to North End Road and includes Empress (formerly Richmond) Place to the north and Seagrave Road, SW6 to the south. The roads were named by the Fulham Board of Works in 1867 Between the Grade 1 Listed Brompton Cemetery in RBKC and its Conservation area in Earl’s Court and the Grade 2 Listed Hermitage Cottages in H&F lies an astonishing industrial and vernacular area of heritage that English Heritage deems ripe for obliteration. See for example, COIL: https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1439963. (Former HQ of Piccadilly Line) The area has significantly contributed to: o Rail and motor Transport o Building crafts o Engineering o Rail, automotive and aero industries o Brewing and distilling o Art o Sport, Trade exhibitions and mass entertainment o Health services o Green corridor © Lillie Road Residents Association, February1 2018 Draft London Plan Consultation: ref. Chapter 7 Heritage - Neglect & Destruction February 2018 Stanford’s 1864 Library map: The Lillie Enclave is south and west of point “47” © Lillie Road Residents Association, February2 2018 Draft London Plan Consultation: ref. Chapter 7 Heritage - Neglect & Destruction February 2018 Movers and Shakers Here are some of the people and companies who left their mark on just three streets laid out by Sir John Lillie in the old County of Middlesex on the border of Fulham and Kensington parishes Samuel Foote (1722-1777), Cornishman dramatist, actor, theatre manager lived in ‘The Hermitage’. -
Parks, People and Nature
Parks, People and Nature A guide to enhancing natural habitats in London’s parks and green spaces in a changing climate Natural England works for people, places and nature to conserve and enhance biodiversity, landscapes and wildlife in rural, urban, coastal and marine areas. We conserve and enhance the natural environment for its intrinsic value, iithe wellbeing and enjoyment of people, and the economic prosperity it brings. Parks, People and Nature A guide to enhancing natural habitats in London’s parks and green spaces in a changing climate Introduction My vision for London is of a green city, and a fair city, where everyone has access to a high quality green space in which wildlife can be encountered close to where they live and work. London has some of the Ýnest parks of any capital city in the world. Yet it also has some areas lacking in green space, and many more where the quality of the green spaces could be better. This booklet provides a valuable practical guide on how to improve access to nature in parks and green spaces, complimenting my London Plan Implementation Report on Improving LondonersÔ access to nature. Appropriate design and management of our parks and green spaces will be one of the key challenges that will enable the City to adapt to climate change. Park managers need to be working now to plant the trees that will provide shade for a much warmer city in the 2080s. We also need to start thinking now how our parks can help in addressing broader environmental challenges such as Þood risk management. -
Chapter 24 Route Window W3 Old Oak Common Depot
Chapter 24 Route window W3 Old Oak Common Depot Transport for London OLD OAK COMMON DEPOT The permanent works 24 Route window W3 24.7 The permanent works will consist of 14 new Crossrail stabling sidings within the site of Old Oak Old Oak Common depot Common depot. A further siding incorporating a train washing facility will also be provided. The sidings will be overhead electrified and located between the existing English Welsh & Scottish and First Great Western depots on a section of land known as the Coronation Sidings. This will require some remodelling of existing trackwork to accommodate the needs of other existing users within the depot. The site will also include a staff accommodation building. 24.8 Before the construction of the sidings the site will also be used temporarily as a tunnel Transport construction and fit-out depot. for London Worksite assessment 24.9 One worksite is directly accessed off Old Oak Common Lane and is described below. The lorry route is shown on Map W3 (iv). Old Oak Common depot worksite 24.10 Works at Old Oak Common are to be carried out from Coronation sidings within the existing footprint area of the depot. Trackwork materials will generally be brought into the site by rail, using appropriate existing trackwork as a railhead. During construction any disruption to other railway operators on the site will be kept to a reasonable minimum. Introduction 24.11 Excavated/demolition materials and civil and structural materials (steel and concrete) will be 24.1 Within this route window the main Crossrail works will involve: transported into and out of the site by road using the existing depot access on Old Oak Common • Track re-modelling to provide 14 new Crossrail sidings; and Lane. -
Old Oak and Park Royal Community Charrette Broadsheet • Saturday 5 December 2015
OLD OAK AND PARK ROYAL COMMUNITY CHARRETTE BROADSHEET • SATURDAY 5 DECEMBER 2015 “Avoid rigid boundaries to the ‘OPDC’ area – new development must be seamlessly integrated!” Quote from Community Charrette participant On Saturday 5 December 2015 around 50 members and contacts Grand Union Alliance of the Grand Union Alliance participated in workshops and hands- The Grand Union Alliance (GUA) is a network of residents, on planning sessions at the Old Oak and Park Royal Charrette community groups and small businesses across sections of the held at Harlesden Methodist Church. Key outcomes included; three boroughs that will be impacted by the developments and involves groups from neighbouring White City and Kensal • the need for effective community and business involvement Canalside Opportunity Areas. It aims to influence large scale in developing the proposals and inhabiting the new developments through strengthening a diverse range of local developments; voices, to increase community understanding and influence of the • the need to balance the global city development values with plans. It aims to ensure that local residents and business are well appropriate local neighbourhood aspirations; informed, fully consulted and engaged in decision-making about • the importance of protecting existing facilities and land uses development plans. GUA can be contacted by email: and delivering a balance of employment space, housing, [email protected] or by telephone: 07784 286809. green spaces and amenities to serve local needs; and • the importance of developing walkable neighbourhoods and a sustainable movement network within the Opportunity “In the future this is gonna be the UK’s most connected Area and connecting neighbouring communities. -
Map of the Sands End Conservation Area (PDF)
BSI D R E E R G IS TE FS 32265 Mu h arf Produced by Highways & Engineering on the Land Survey Mapping System. This drawing is Copyright. tation Refuse Tip (public) This map is reproduced from Ordnance Pumping Station Recycling Centre Survey material with the permission of the Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of 5 5 Her Majesty's Stationery Office. El 37 Sub 38 86 Sta 88 D A O R S Crown copyright T O Licence No.LA100019223 2006 L © 90 Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown 0 7 7 4 copyright and may lead to prosecution or 3 civil proceedings. L. B. HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM 6 1 to 15 9 Heatherley School of Electricity Ashburnham Fine Art 92 Electricity Generating Station Community Generating Station Centre Mud 3 LEGEND 2 FB 6 Adventure 6 Playground 9 Mean High Water Mud and Shingle Mud and Shingle Chelsea Creek MLW Chelsea Creek CONSERVATION AREA Chelsea Creek 1 16 Shingle Electricity Generating Station PH Car Park 114 AD O R TS LO Mud M ean High ater Wa Mean High W ter MLW Creek MLW Chelsea der Water ean Low High & M Mean ater igh W n H Mea Gas Holder Exhauster House 1 1 Gas Holder le Gas Holder g Mean High Water CHE n ra d 19 a 20 LS u 8 23 Q 4 EA HARB e to h T 1 17 Gas Works 2 30 OU 3 OOD TERRACE R 16 DRIV 2 rt 6 3 HARW 33 IMPE E 1 ou 46 T 0 RIA he C 18 al C L S Admira 1a ir QU Shingle 52 11 ARE ha m 8 m Carlyle Admiral Square Ad 3 bers 18 to 1 Court l Co l 1 9 2 6 S urt C 17 h ILLA 3 to elsea 5 1 H V 5 1 3 6 UG 3 H The Towpath RO 1 O arb 6 4 T RB 4 Laboratory 9 E E ou 1 THA ETE R MES AVEN P T S r D UE 7 L S N es 1 E Gas Holder -
Hsuk London Terminal Strategy
HSUK LONDON TERMINAL STRATEGY In the development of high speed rail systems, the issue of terminal location and onward distribution of passengers assumes almost as much importance as the more obvious question of route. The new lines are designed to carry large volumes of passengers on trains operating at high frequencies, and these factors combine to create major flows arriving at city terminals which must then be efficiently dispersed onto the local public transport networks. This demands full integration of high speed and local systems, with optimised transfer at dedicated and fit-for- purpose terminals. These issues apply at all UK cities where high speed lines are planned, but are most acute in London, where passenger flows are greatest, and congestion in the existing public transport system is most critical. The following diagrams review existing central London connectivity issues, and compare and contrast the London terminal solutions proposed for HS2, and for the alternative High Speed UK proposals. For precise details of the core High Speed UK proposals (as included in the cost estimates), see the ‘200k’ series of plans. LTS1 : LONDON MAIN LINE NETWORK CIRCA 1963 LTS2 : EXISTING CENTRAL LONDON RAIL NETWORK INCLUDING CROSSRAIL SCHEME These diagrams show the rail network of central London, dominated by the classic terminus stations of the Victorian era. These are mostly reliant for onward connectivity upon the Tube network, which tended to form ‘nodes’ around the busier/more important termini. However, the change from main line to Tube is inherently inefficient, with passengers forced to detrain en masse, and with massive congestion occurring especially at rush hours.