DOCSLIB.ORG

Development Infrastructure Funding Study (DIFS)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Development Infrastructure Funding Study (DIFS) Development Infrastructure Funding Study (DIFS) LOCAL PLAN SUPPORTING STUDY Draft for Regulation 18 Consultation 4 February 2016 Role of this study This study has been produced to inform the draft Local Plan and should be read alongside other relevant studies, the draft Local Plan and the London Plan. Study overview Document title Development Infrastructure Funding Study (DIFS) Lead author Peter Brett Associates and Jones Lang LaSalle Purpose of the study To identify: ■ the infrastructure requirements of growth at Old Oak; ■ when the demands for infrastructure arise; ■ how much those infrastructure requirements cost; and ■ how those infrastructure requirements might be paid for. Stage of production Completed to inform Regulation 18 version of the Local Plan Key outputs ■ Current indicative assumptions above land values, abnormal costs including decontamination and sales values; ■ Assumptions around potential phasing and release of development sites ■ Necessary transport, social, economic, environmental, utility and physical infrastructure to support the needs of development ■ Indications of the current day costs of this infrastructure ■ Potential mechanisms for the funding of the infrastructure ■ An indicative cashflow diagram showing potential funding gaps and opportunities to finance this. Key recommendations ■ There is a need for over £1.5billion infrastructure to support development in Old Oak ■ CIL and S106 can go some way towards funding this, but other means of funding this infrastructure will need to be investigated ■ There are significant cashflow issues and the phasing of the infrastructure may need to be reconsidered. Relations to other studies The DIFS work has been used as the basis for phasing assump- tions in OPDC’s Development Capacity Study (DCS). The DIFS work is Old Oak focussed and should be read alongside new studies with a greater focus on Park Royal such as the Park Royal Transport Study and the Public Realm, Walking and Cycling Strat- egy. Next steps The DIFS has now been finalised and its outputs are being used to inform OPDC’s work on its Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) and Section 106 SPD. Consultation questions 1. Do you agree with the recommendations of this supporting study? If not, please explain why. 2. Do you agree with the methods used in delivering the recommendations? If not, please set out alternative approaches and why these should be used. 3. Are there any other elements which the supporting study should address? If yes, please define these. You can provide comments directly through: opdc.commonplace.is Old Oak and Park Royal Development Infrastructure Funding Study Greater London Authority Old Oak and Park Royal Development Infrastructure Funding Study Peter Brett Associates March 2015 with i Old Oak Development Infrastructure Funding Study Final report Document Control Sheet Project Name: Old Oak and Park Royal Development Infrastructure Funding Study Project Ref: 30465 Doc Ref: Final v1.1 Date: March 2015 with minor adjustments October 2015 Name Position Signature Date Prepared by: Andrew Clarke Senior Assoc 30/3/15 Reviewed by: Keith Mitchell Chairman 30/3/15 Approved by: Keith Mitchell Chairman 30/3/15 For and on behalf of Peter Brett Associates LLP Peter Brett Associates LLP disclaims any responsibility to the Client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of this report. This report has been prepared with reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the Client and generally in accordance with the appropriate ACE Agreement and taking account of the manpower, resources, investigations and testing devoted to it by agreement with the Client. This report is confidential to the Client and Peter Brett Associates LLP accepts no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report or any part thereof is made known. Any such party relies upon the report at their own risk. © Peter Brett Associates LLP 2015 THIS REPORT IS FORMATTED FOR DOUBLE-SIDED PRINTING. March 2015 ii Old Oak Development Infrastructure Funding Study Final report CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................................. 1 Objectives .................................................................................................................... 1 Date of research ........................................................................................................... 1 Gross infrastructure costs and funding ......................................................................... 1 Looking at costs and funding attributable to Old Oak .................................................... 6 Testing other development scenarios ..........................................................................13 Towards a land use plan for the proposed OPDC .......................................................14 Recommendations ......................................................................................................14 Key facts, figures and assumptions in the study ..........................................................17 2 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................21 Context ........................................................................................................................21 Date of research ..........................................................................................................21 Our scope ...................................................................................................................22 Compliance with national policy...................................................................................23 3 PART 1: GROWTH PLANS ........................................................................................25 4 WHAT KINDS OF GROWTH ARE PLANNED, AND WHEN? ....................................27 Introduction .................................................................................................................27 Old Oak today .............................................................................................................27 What growth is planned, and when? ............................................................................27 5 PART 2: WHAT INFRASTRUCTURE IS NEEDED TO SUPPORT DEVELOPMENT? . ....................................................................................................................................33 6 APPROACH................................................................................................................35 The types of infrastructure we are covering .................................................................35 What infrastructure is required? Our approach ............................................................36 When is infrastructure required? Our approach ...........................................................37 What does infrastructure cost? Our approach .............................................................38 What funding for infrastructure might be sought? Our approach ..................................43 Our approach to prioritisation ......................................................................................46 Categories of infrastructure outside our scope ............................................................46 Caveats attached ........................................................................................................47 7 TRANSPORT ..............................................................................................................49 Introduction .................................................................................................................49 Project summary .........................................................................................................49 March 2015 iii Old Oak Development Infrastructure Funding Study Final report Method ........................................................................................................................52 Transport context ........................................................................................................53 What are the infrastructure requirements arising from development? What are the costs?..........................................................................................................................55 When is infrastructure required?..................................................................................61 How can infrastructure be funded? ..............................................................................64 Issues, dependencies and barriers to growth ..............................................................64 8 EDUCATION ...............................................................................................................67 Introduction .................................................................................................................67 Project summary .........................................................................................................67 Context ........................................................................................................................68 What infrastructure is needed? How much does it cost? ............................................69 How can infrastructure be paid for? .............................................................................71 Issues and recommendations ......................................................................................72
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Map of the Bishops Park Conservation Area
    73 9 8 6 9 3 9 4 Churc 4 5 Bakery 7 5 T 7 19 23 41 8 Wharf 22 7 59 7 E D 9 4 10 446 23 1 60 E 7 39 45 A 1 7 2 444 R 2 43 O a 4 T 10 4 1 R 4 Em 9 El to 1 7 7 0 S D 5 L A f Sub Sta 4 Exchang O 8 0 T 7 ploy F 2 11 2 SE N ing Y c Centre 4 62 5 A W 3 o L 20 202 1 2 3 18 8 A earn t 51 T ment 103 1 A a 36 70 AD Produced by Highways & Engineering 40 e The Coda 13 241 Kingwood L 7 175 BSI ILLSHOTT CLO 24 M 1 120 0 17 1 Resource Centre a 5 OD RO 4 t 11 a to e 5 3 O S on the Land Survey Mapping System. 5 49 W 35 40 0 3 6 D 5 K 3 4 8 196 7 1 El Sub 37 D 25 KING 4 A 11 1 1 6 O S ROA This drawing is Copyright. 1 10 R to MILLSHOTT 127 to 133 to 127 s OP 1 T 1 er r 13 S e 30 R 30 34 R ilm b 1 ta 2 U F m s BISH 1 to 4 to 1 M 15 H a 69 92 S N h 8 5 b D u A R C 3 E 2 0 SQUARE 167 E R 60 2 8 7 1 F nce 1 l S R 3 4 6 Henry 2 G E E e 3 67 Y 5 3 4 7 74 4 ET A 5 3 R 8 15 I Compton Secondary 15 S T 24 E 13 Tennis T D TRE 3 ery School 3 S 0 to esid N 10 Court This map is reproduced from Ordnance O Surg 7 C Y 142 3 ROA 7 L 184 4 EN 38 O K 42 8 Survey material with the permission of the FS 32265 25 SE 28 31 ER ster R AD 20 ry 47 2 O n 23 94 26 0 59 e ton un 7 ILM p to 6 8 C 9 D R H Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Wharf 4 2 l 34 115 9 O m o F 0 LO 113 7 1 157 M o o 5 1 O W C ch W 6 S 2 N 48 United G 6 IN 4 M Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
    [Show full text]
  • The Park Keeper
    The Park Keeper 1 ‘Most of us remember the park keeper of the past. More often than not a man, uniformed, close to retirement age, and – in the mind’s eye at least – carrying a pointed stick for collecting litter. It is almost impossible to find such an individual ...over the last twenty years or so, these individuals have disappeared from our parks and in many circumstances their role has not been replaced.’ [Nick Burton1] CONTENTS training as key factors in any parks rebirth. Despite a consensus that the old-fashioned park keeper and his Overview 2 authoritarian ‘keep off the grass’ image were out of place A note on nomenclature 4 in the 21st century, the matter of his disappearance crept back constantly in discussions.The press have published The work of the park keeper 5 articles4, 5, 6 highlighting the need for safer public open Park keepers and gardening skills 6 spaces, and in particular for a rebirth of the park keeper’s role. The provision of park-keeping services 7 English Heritage, as the government’s advisor on the Uniforms 8 historic environment, has joined forces with other agencies Wages and status 9 to research the skills shortage in public parks.These efforts Staffing levels at London parks 10 have contributed to the government’s ‘Cleaner, Safer, Greener’ agenda,7 with its emphasis on tackling crime and The park keeper and the community 12 safety, vandalism and graffiti, litter, dog fouling and related issues, and on broader targets such as the enhancement of children’s access to culture and sport in our parks The demise of the park keeper 13 and green spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Office Suite 1 Fulham Palace Bishops Avenue, Fulham, London SW6 6EA Boston Gilmore LLP 020 7603 1616
    Office Suite 1 Fulham Palace Bishops Avenue, Fulham, London SW6 6EA Boston Gilmore LLP www.bostongilmore.com 020 7603 1616 Private redecorated office suite Mainly first floor c.1,872 sq ft (174 sq m) approx HOUSE AND GARDEN BACKGROUND The historic house and garden of the Bishop of London since 704, now open to all to discover over 1300 years of British history in the heart of London. For centuries, this Grade I Listed building situated in extensive grounds by the River Thames was the country residence of the Bishops of London. Visitors to Fulham Palace have a wealth of things to see and do from exploring the museum that charts the Palace’s eventful history to having lunch in the Drawing Room restaurant that looks out onto the beautiful gardens. Fulham Palace garden is protected as an important historic landscape. Once enclosed by the longest moat in England, 13 acres remain of the original 36. The surviving layout is mainly 19th century with an earlier Walled Garden and some 18th century landscaping. www.fulhampalace.org LOCATION Fulham Palace and its grounds enjoy a stunning setting alongside Bishops Park on the banks of the River Thames. Bishops Avenue provides vehicular access, which leads to Fulham Palace Road, close to the junction with Fulham High Street and New Kings Road. Alternatively, an attractive riverside walk runs through Bishops Park to Putney Bridge. Putney Bridge Underground Station (District Line) is easily accessible and there are a number of bus routes from Hammersmith and Fulham Broadway. Fulham Palace Road provides convenient access north to Hammersmith Broadway connecting to the M4, and south over the river connecting to the A3/M3.
    [Show full text]
  • GROWING up in HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM This Report Explores the Lives of Young People Living in Hammersmith and Fulham in 2020
    GROWING UP IN HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM This report explores the lives of young people living in Hammersmith and Fulham in 2020. Matthew Walsham Partnership for Young London [email protected] Annie Rockson Young Hammersmith and Fulham Foundation [email protected] September 2020 02 GROWING UP IN HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM CONTENTS Young Hammersmith INTRODUCTION & Fulham Foundation 04 Methodology 10 Sample 12 Partnership for Young London 06 PART 1 Being from Hammersmith and Fulham 14 Introduction from the Peer Researchers 07 PART 2 Coronavirus 20 KEY FINDINGS 08 Part 3 Spaces, Place and Youth Services 26 Part 4A Education 31 Part 4B Employment 35 PART 5 Safety and the Police 41 PART 6 Racial Inequality 48 PART 7 Health and Wellbeing 54 DISCUSSION 62 GROWING UP IN HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM 03 Young Hammersmith & Fulham Foundation Young H & F prides itself on placing the voice and we shouldn’t lose sight that despite the of young people at the very forefront of our work. many advantages and privileges afforded to us We use the insight to help shape the services we in London, there is still a way to go to ensure offer and support our Members to provide the equality of opportunity. most impactful and relevant opportunities for The report, which was compiled by young young people. people aged 13 -24, addresses many issues Young people should provide the mandate for including the Black Lives Matter campaign, how the borough becomes the best place to live, current aspirations and of course a snapshot work, learn and play. By providing mechanisms of the impact that the coronavirus pandemic such as this Peer Research project, we are has had and will have in future.
    [Show full text]
  • Use This Template to Draft a Cabinet Or Committee Report
    A11 THE ROYAL BOROUGH OF KENSINGTON AND CHELSEA PUBLIC REALM SCRUTINY COMMITTEE – 9 MAY 2013 REPORT BY THE DIRECTOR FOR SAFER NEIGHBOURHOODS SAFER NEIGHBOURHOODS SERVICES PARKS POLICE SERVICE REVIEW REPORT The Parks Police Service Review has now been concluded and a number of recommendations accepted by the responsible Cabinet Members in both the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham and the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. Significant financial savings of approximately £140,000 (across both boroughs in 2013/14) are expected to be achieved as a consequence of these recommendations being accepted. £40,000 of these efficiencies are being delivered through a reduction in the number of parks being locked overnight in LB Hammersmith and Fulham. The review recommended that the two Parks Police Services are integrated to form a single team led by a Bi-borough Parks Police Inspector reporting to the Head of Community Safety. The Bi-borough Parks Police Service went live on 1st April 2013, initially patrolling from its two existing bases at 77 Glenthorne Road, Hammersmith and The Stable Yard, Holland Park. In the longer term a single patrol base would be desirable. FOR INFORMATION 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION This document presents the key findings and recommendations from the Biborough Parks Police Service Review. The review also received constructive peer challenge from the British Transport Police and the London Borough of Ealing Parks Service. The provision of a policing service in parks is a discretionary local authority service. The only other London Boroughs with an in-house parks constabulary are the Corporation of London, with teams in both Hampstead Heath and Epping Forest, and Havering, which has a small Parks Protection Service.
    [Show full text]
  • New Electoral Arrangements for Hammersmith & Fulham Council
    New electoral arrangements for Hammersmith & Fulham Council Final Recommendations June 2020 Translations and other formats: To get this report in another language or in a large-print or Braille version, please contact the Local Government Boundary Commission for England at: Tel: 0330 500 1525 Email: [email protected] Licensing: The mapping in this report is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Keeper of Public Records © Crown copyright and database right. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and database right. Licence Number: GD 100049926 2020 A note on our mapping: The maps shown in this report are for illustrative purposes only. Whilst best efforts have been made by our staff to ensure that the maps included in this report are representative of the boundaries described by the text, there may be slight variations between these maps and the large PDF map that accompanies this report, or the digital mapping supplied on our consultation portal. This is due to the way in which the final mapped products are produced. The reader should therefore refer to either the large PDF supplied with this report or the digital mapping for the true likeness of the boundaries intended. The boundaries as shown on either the large PDF map or the digital mapping should always appear identical. Contents Introduction 1 Who we are and what we do 1 What is an electoral review? 1 Why Hammersmith & Fulham? 2 Our proposals for Hammersmith & Fulham 2 How will the recommendations affect you? 2
    [Show full text]
  • London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham With
    London Borough of Brent BUCKINGHAM BUCKINGHAMHIGH WENDOVER HOLLAND RD AVENUE SPEZIA RD STREET RUCKLIDGE MWS LEGHORN STATION ROAD ROAD RD MONSON BUCHANAN RD WROTTE GDNS ROAD HARLESDEN CAPLE AVENUE RD ROAD LUSHING- RD SLEYTON RD RD RANELAGH RD RD ODESSA HARLEY RD ALL SOULS' GDNS RD AVE BATHURST LONDON BOROUGH OF HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM INGALE R O A D ROAD FURNESS P A L E R M O LANGLER ROAD HONEYWOOD NIGHT ROAD LINDEN AVE TUBBS ROAD CLIFTON ROAD RD PURVES VICTOR COLLEGE FELIXTOWE ROAD HAR ROAD NAPIER RD ROAD ASHBURNHAM RAVENSWORTH STATION Willesden ROW MS GREYHOUND ROAD GDNS PONSARD RD ROAD CHAMBERLANE RD APP LETCHFORD ROAD Junction LETCHFORD BURROWS ROAD VALLIERE GDNS RD S WITH RD BAN. RD ST RIGELEY HARROW MORTIMER CREWE RD RIGELEY MS GDNS ROAD ST Kensal Green ROAD PL RD LANE HOLBERTON MARNE ST WALDO KENMONT GDNS HAZEL ROAD TRENMAR PLOUGH CLOSE WAKEMAN LOTHROP ROAD AVENUE RD CPA HALSTOW STEPHENSON ALMA ROAD STREET BAYF. RD RAINHAM RD OLIPHANT AVE KILRAVOCK LANCEFIELD LANE CPA COMPTON RD PLACE PEMBER RD PEACH GOODHALL Old Oak RD ILBERT STREET PARRY ATLAS CUMBERLAND PK QUEENS ROYAL BOROUGH OF KENSINGTON AND CHELSEA SCRUBS STREET PARK AVENUE Sidings BERENS OAK ENTER COURT STREET FORTUNEWAY BRUCKNER WARF. RD PRISE Hythe Road AVE KILBURN Gateway Kensal Green ST OLD H Y T H E WAY Industrial Trading Estate SIXTH FIFTH HARROW CAIRD ST ROAD Estate ROAD SALTER ROAD STREET St. Mary's HUXLEY ST RIVER ST Cemetery ENBROOK ST ROAD GALTONS ST R D DROOP CL GRAND FOURTH Cemetery STREET ST THIRD LAPF. SALTER BARFETT CL ROAD BASHLEY WARLOCK GDNS ROAD ALPER.
    [Show full text]
  • University of London Boat Club Boathouse, Chiswick
    Played in London a directory of historic sporting assets in London compiled for English Heritage by Played in Britain 2014 Played in London a directory of historic sporting assets in London This document has been compiled from research carried out as part of the Played in London project, funded by English Heritage from 2010-14 Contacts: Played in Britain Malavan Media Ltd PO Box 50730 NW6 1YU 020 7794 5509 [email protected] www.playedinbritain.co.uk Project author: Simon Inglis Project manager: Jackie Spreckley English Heritage 1 Waterhouse Square, 138-142 Holborn, London EC1N 2ST 0207 973 3000 www.english-heritage.org.uk Project Assurance Officer: Tim Cromack If you require an alternative accessible version of this document (for instance in audio, Braille or large print) please contact English Heritage’s Customer Services Department: telephone: 0870 333 1181 fax: 01793 414926 textphone: 0800 015 0516 e-mail: [email protected] © Malavan Media Ltd. January 2015 malavan media Contents Introduction .................................................................................4 � 1 Barking and Dagenham.................................................................7 � 2 Barnet ........................................................................................8 � 3 Bexley ......................................................................................10 � 4 Brent ......................................................................................11 � 5 Bromley ....................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Bishops Park House 25-29 Fulham High Street London Sw6 3Jh
    BISHOPS PARK HOUSE 25-29 FULHAM HIGH STREET LONDON SW6 3JH RETAIL SHOWROOM OPPORTUNITY APPROX 3,161 SQ FT / 296 SQ M plus rear patio and parking ALTERNATIVE USES SUBJECT TO PLANNING, POTENTIAL D OR B CLASS LOCATION Bishops Park House is prominently located on the north side of Fulham High Street between the junctions of Fulham Road and New Kings Road, close to Putney Bridge (District line) underground station and in this highly regarded residential area. Other occupiers include C.P.Hart Bathrooms, Living Space Furniture Showroom, Andrews Office Furniture, Circa Vintage Clothing, Darlings of Chelsea and Laurence Pigeon Kitchen Showroom. AVAILABILITY The premises comprise a ground floor showroom with frontages either side of the central office entrance for the upper parts. The premises are currently used as an interior design showroom and offices and there is rear parking and access available. The accommodation extends to approximately 3,161 sq ft and is being reinstated mainly to open plan with 2 rear offices and a kitchen in the basement. TERMS The premises are available on new lease directly from the freeholder. GUIDE RENT £95,000 per annum exclusive, payable quarterly in advance. BUSINESS RATES The premises are located in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham, tel 020 8753 6681 who must be contacted to verify the following information:- Rateable Value £62,500. Rates Payable £32,000 per annum for year 2020/21. SERVICE CHARGE On application FLOOR PLANS Rear access leading from the car park ENERGY PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE (EPC) To be assessed TIMING The premises are immediately available. FURTHER INFORMATION From joint sole agents.
    [Show full text]
  • 65 Bishops Mansions
    Top floor apartment in the popular Bishops Mansions Bishops Mansions, Bishops Park Road, Fulham, London, SW6 £650 pw (£2,816.67 pcm) plus fees apply, Unfurnished Available from 31.10.2019 3 Bedrooms • Eat-in kitchen • Study • Communal gardens • Po pular mansion block Local Information Bishops Mansions are located on Bishops Park Road, ideally located moments from Bishops Park and the Thames Footpath and 0.7 miles from Putney Bridge underground station, as well as the many amenities and transport links of the Fulham Palace Road, Fulham High Street and the Munster Village. About this property Savills are pleased to present this Top floor apartment in the popular Bishops Mansions in Bishops Park. This apartment boasts high ceilings, extensive storage and access to beautiful communal gardens. The property comprises two double bedrooms both with fitted wardrobes and one single/study with use of a bathroom benefitting a bath and overhead shower. A spacious reception room with views overlooking Bishops park and tennis courts, there is also a separate eat-in kitchen with space for dining that is ideal for entertaining leading to a utility room with separate washing machine and dryer. Furnishing Unfurnished Local Authority Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council, Town Hall Energy Performance EPC Rating = E Viewing All viewings will be accompanied and are strictly by prior arrangement through Savills Bishops Park Lettings Office. Telephone: +44 (0) 20 7578 9051. Bishops Mansions, Bishops Park Road, Fulham, London, SW6 Gross Internal Area 970 sq ft, 90.1 m² Kate Rotheram Bishops Park Lettings +44 (0) 20 7578 9051 savills savills.co.uk [email protected] Important notice Savills, their clients and any joint agents give notice that: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the History and Archaeology of Queen's
    THE HISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY OF QUEEN’S WOOD Michael Hacker July 2017 Frontispiece: Queen’s Wood - three year coppiced hazel and hornbeam with oak standards.1 1 image © Michael Hacker 2016 1 Summary Queen’s Wood is one of four areas of ancient woodland in Haringey that have been wooded for at least four hundred years. But little is known of the early history and development of the wood; was the land always wooded, what was the nature of the early woodland and how has it changed over time? This account of the history of Queen’s Wood reviews the results of a series of small- scale archaeological evaluations carried out in Queen’s Wood and the nearby Coldfall Wood between 2010 and 2012. It relates the results of these evaluations to information derived from documents and maps as well as recent botanical surveys. The land has been continuously wooded for at least the last thousand years, and possibly since prehistoric times. For much of this time the wood was not untamed wildwood but was managed for its timber and firewood, and grazed by cattle and pigs. This has lead to radical changes in the nature of the wood. Initially, the prehistoric woodland was probably dominated by lime with elm and oak. By the late Saxon period this had been replaced by open grazed wood-pasture dominated by hazel and oak. During the Middle Ages the woodland became degraded through over- exploitation and what was to become Queen’s Wood was enclosed by a woodbank to protect it from grazing and trespass.
    [Show full text]
  • St-James-Langham-Square-Local-Area
    WELCOME TO LANGHAM SQUARE Langham Square is an ideal place to enjoy cosmopolitan city living. Located in established vibrant riverside Putney, surrounded by some of the greenest parks and commons in London, Langham Square is just minutes from the heart of the city via adjoining East Putney (Zone 2) Underground station or the nearby train station. CONTENTS EATING OUT 2-3 SHOPPING 10-11 PUBS / BARS 4-5 FITNESS & LEISURE 12-13 ENTERTAINMENT 6-7 GREEN SPACEs 14 MAP 8-9 HEALTH 15 * NB denotes map reference TRAVEL 16-17 * Computer Generated Image of Langham Square facing South from Upper Richmond Road. Indicative only and subject to planning. EATING OUT Thai Square I6 Al Forno Restaurant E6 2-4 Lower Richmond Road, SW15 1LB 349 Upper Richmond Road, SW15 5QL 020 8780 1811 020 8878 7522 Samratt H6 Ask C8 18-21 Lacy Road, SW15 1NL 52 Station Road, SW13 0LP 020 8785 4487 020 8878 9300 Pizza Express I5 Enoteca Turi I6 144 Upper Richmond Road, SW15 2SW 28 Putney High Street, SW15 1SQ 020 8789 1948 020 8785 4449 Strada I5 Bayee Village 147 Upper Richmond Road, SW15 2TX 24 High Street, SW19 5DX 020 8789 6996 020 8947 3533 Valentina J4 Destino I5 75 Upper Richmond Rd, SW15 2SR 141 Upper Richmond Road, SW15 2TX 020 8877 9906 020 8789 4304 Carluccio’s I6 Yia-Mas K4 Brewhouse Lane, SW15 2JQ 40 Upper Richmond Road, SW15 2RX 020 8789 0591 020 8871 4671 La Vera Italia J4 Wallace & Co I5 100 Upper Richmond Road, SW15 2SP 146 Upper Richmond Road, SW15 2SW 020 8788 2174 020 8780 0052 La Mancha I6 32 Putney High St, SW15 1SQ 020 8780 1022 2 3 PUBS / BARS Coat
    [Show full text]