DOCSLIB.ORG

Del-Negro-Karem.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Del-Negro-Karem.Pdf Renaissance 2/2011 - 1 .arina Del Negro Karem A Con$lation o$ C aracters ; e &ortra'al o$ Aristotle and Averro?s as >e)s in a 4enetian 5ncuna0ulum Fig. 1: Girolamo da Cremona, Aristotle lecturing Averröes, tempera Fig. 2: Girolamo da Cremona, ;ur0a &hilosophorum, tempera and and gold on parchment, 1483, $rontispiece o$ Aristotle%s &hysics ()it gold on parchment, 1483, $rontispiece o$ Aristotle:s 6or3s, $ol. 2, Commentar' o$ Averröes) $ol. 1, 40.+ , 27.2 cm, &ierpont Morgan &ierpont Morgan Li0rary, 1e) 2or3, in: 4enice and t e 5slamic 6orld Li0rary, 1e) 2or3, in: 4enice and t e 5slamic 6orld 828-1797, 1e) 828-179-, 1e) 7aven, 2007, p. 168. 7aven, 2007, p. 165. A Latin edition o$ Aristotle's &hysics and 6orks )it )hic he com0ined $or the $irst time a classical archi- the Commentary o$ Averroes, a t)o-volume incuna0- tectural setting wit an illusionistic device which he in- ulum, )as published in Venice in 1483.[1] ;he 0oo3s vented kno)n as the “torn parchment lea$.”[4] )ere compiled 0' the humanist Nicoletto Vernia, a Aristotle, seated on the right holds together )ell-3no)n Averroist $rom the Universit' o$ &adua his thum0 and inde, $ingers as if enumerating his and published 0' Andreas ;orresanus.[2] ;he )or3 points. ;he rings on his $ingers ma' 0e sym0olically had 0een commissioned 0' &eter Ugelheimer, a connected to his arguments $or a spherical and $inite )ealt ' German humanist )ho lived in Venice and universe centered on the earth.[5] His le$t hand is e,- )as a $re=uent partner in the >enson printing and tended to)ards Averro?s. Aristotle )ears a 0lue cape publishing 0usiness. Ugelheimer considered the dec- over a red tunic, yello) 0oots and, on his head, a red orated incuna0ulum a precious collectible.[3] Clearly, close-fitting cap called scuf$ia in Venice.[6] Bn top o$ he spared no e,penses $or the decorations o$ the the scuf$ia he )ears a hat )it a $orward-pointing $rontispieces pre$acing Aristotle's &hysics and 6orks, 0rim. Cot the hat and scuf$ia are adorned )it small $or he engaged Girolamo da Cremona, a )ell-3no)n circular 0eje)eled 0rooches. A red sha)l covers his artist )ho had trained at &adua in .antegna's )or3- stooped shoulders. His long )hite 0eard and hair un- shop and had achieved a reputation as the 0est illu- derscore his old age. Averro?s sits on the ground minator working all'antica. slightly 0elo) Aristotle, on the opposite side o$ the ;he tempera and gold on parchment illumin- composition. He is portrayed )it a long $lo)ing ation )hic portrays Averro?s and Aristotle facing one 0eard and his )hite hair is almost completely covered another, opens the te,t o$ the &hysics volume ($ig. 1). 0' a )hite round turban. ;he .uslim philosopher Girolamo enclosed the figures within a frame)ork in )ears a yello) coat )it a red sha)l and red 0oots. Marina Eel 1egro Farem A Con$lation o$ C aracters 3unstte,te.de 2/2011 - 2 He gestures to)ards Aristotle )hile, pen in hand, he characteristics o$ Je)ish attire. seems read' to )rite his $amous Commentary. ;he ;hroug out Europe >e)s )ere easily recog- Northern alpine setting in )hic the t)o philosophers niza0le 0ecause since the Fourt Lateran Council in are seated ma' 0e a re$erence to Ugelheimer’s Ger- 1215, the' had 0een compelled to )ear some signs man bac3ground. on their clothing to distinguish them $rom Christians. ;he miniature $or the second volume o$ the .ost commonly, the re=uired @distinguishing sign” incuna0ulum portrays the ;urba &hilosophorum ($ig. )as in the $orm o$ a yello) circle or 0adge. 5n 5taly, 2). Here, a group o$ seven philosophers stand almost these regulations )ere variously applied. 5n Venice, in a straight ro) near the 0alustrade o$ a classical starting in the early $ifteent century, )hen the Vene- portico. Centrally placed, Averro?s, )earing a yello) tian authorities discovered that the yello) 0adge or ro0e and light, )hite-yello)ish turban, stands ne,t to ruella could 0e easily covered, the >e)s )ere com- Aristotle. ;he Gree3, sho)n standing to Averro?s' pelled to )ear more prominent signs, usually a yello) right, appears as a 'oung, 0ro)n-bearded man. He is hat, cap or scuf$ia. ;he yello) color, o)ever, )as al- $rontally placed and )ears a 0lue cape and a 0lac3, most universally connected to pimps, prostitutes and )ide-0rimmed hat. His right hand points to)ards a other negative cultural aspects and the >e)s )ere re- cartellino )it the title o$ his 0oo3 on .etaphysics luctant to )ear it. ;here$ore, particularly in periods (Liber &rimus .etaphysicae* )hile his le$t hand points during which the Je)ish presence was essential to to his $amous commentator. Aristotle loo3s 0ac3, to- )ards &lato )ho stands to his right. His old teacher is sho)n in pro$ile, arms crossed over his chest loo3ing to)ards Aristotle. &lato )ears a green ro0e )it a 0ro)n sha)l and, like Aristotle, a )ide-0rimmed hat over a red scuf$ia. ;he t)o $igures 0ehind &lato have 0een identified as the ancient commentators o$ Aris- totle, ;hemistius, )it a red ro0e and 0ro)n sha)l, and Ale,ander o$ Aphrodisias )it a 0lue ro0e and yello) sha)l.[7] Avicenna, the other .uslim philo- sopher in this scene, stands ne,t to Averro?s. He is dressed in a red ro0e and his turban is )rapped around a multi-pointed cro)n. Farthest to the le$t, al- most at the 0orders o$ the scene is a Eominican mon3. He is reading, head do)n, eyes on the pages Fig. 3: Anonymous 4enetian artist, ;ransportation o$ t e Ar3 o$ the Covenant (detail*, tempera on parc ment, a$ter 1475, $olios ! (verso* o$ an open 0oo3. Bn the opposite side o$ the com- and 9 (recto*, &salterium, .ilan, Bi0lioteca ;rivulIiana, in: 5van &enslar and Eere3 Falmar (eds.*, Brientalism and t e >e)s, 6altham position, a monke' )it a prominent red sha)l sits on (Mass.* 2005, cover. the 0alustrade )it his 0ac3 turned a)a' $rom the group. ;he illustrations $or the $rontispieces o$ the the econom' o$ the Venetian Republic, the authorities t)o volumes )ere the last Girolamo completed. Argu- tended to loo3 the other )a' )hen >e)s )ore a red a0ly the 0est miniature painter in the second half o$ hat or scuf$ia.[8] ;he Venetians )ere satisfied in that the $ifteent century, he had )orked $or the Este in red )as still a distinguishing color )hile >e)s $ound it Ferrara. Later, he had 0een active in .antua, &adua, $ar more pre$era0le than the a0omina0le yello). ;he Hiena and Florence 0e$ore going to Venice, )here he shape o$ the >e)ish hat varied. 5talian and 1orthern )orked $rom 1474 until his deat in 1483. Girolamo’s (AshkenaIi) >e)s )ho had esta0lished permanent prolonged sojourn in .antua, Ferrara and Venice, cit- residence in 5taly )ore the same clothes as the Chris- ies )ell 3no)n $or their hig concentration o$ >e)s, tian population. ;he only dif$erence 0et)een Christian )ould have rendered him $amiliar )it the salient and >e)ish headgear )ould have 0een only a matter Marina Eel 1egro Farem A Con$lation o$ C aracters 3unstte,te.de 2/2011 - # o$ colors. Ho)ever, traveling merchants )ho lived in various 5talian cities only $or 0rie$ periods, maintained their native $ashion. ;hus, Northern >e)s typically )ore a 0lac3 )ide-0rimmed hat )it either a $lat or domed cro)n. ;he hat )as )orn over a )ool or linen scuf$ia. Nota0ly, as )e see illustrated in this Venetian &salterium o$ ca. 1475, Levantine (Eastern) Je)s, usu- ally connected to the important silk trade in Venice, maintained their native $ashion o$ )earing long ro0es and turbans )hic )ere in all details similar to the .uslim dress ($ig. #*.[9] 5n Venice, there$ore, Levantine >e)s )ould have 0een virtually indistinguisha0le $rom the .uslim merchants in the city. ;his is noted in vari- ous paintings e,ecuted to)ards the end o$ the Juat- Fig. 5: Anonymous artist, 5talian >e) )earing a at )it $or- )ard-pointing 0rim, $olio !# (verso* ms. add. 26957, British /i0rary, trocento.[10] For e,ample, AshkenaIi and Levantine London, in: ; erese MetIger, >e)ish Li$e in the Middle Ages, Fri- 0ourg 1982, p. 131. >e)s are represented mingling )ith other $oreign mer- chants in Carpaccio's Healing o$ the &ossessed .an at Rialto ($ig. !*, a )ork the artist completed in 1496 5n the $rontispiece to the &hysics ($ig. 1) Aristotle $or the Hcuola Grande di Han Giovanni Evangelista. )ears the distinguishing >e)ish red scuf$ia under his Like many other narrative paintings e,ecuted 0' vari- hat. Ho)ever, the hat has a $orward-pointing 0rim ous artists $or the Venetian Hcuole, Carpaccio’s )ork )hic is dif$erent $rom the typical )ide-0rimmed hat accurately recorded the tiniest details o$ daily life in )orn 0' merchants. ;his is the type o$ hat typically the city.[11] 5n this scene (and indeed in most o$ the )orn 0' >e)ish scholars in the $ifteent century ($ig. other narrative paintings) 5 have identified a num0er o$ 9*. Another mark o$ the @scholarly” >e)ish identit' can >e)s among the cro)ds at the $oot o$ the Rialto 0e seen in Aristotle’s red sha)l or @;allit.” ;he ;allit 0ridge, suc as the t)o AshkenaIi and Levantine )as a type o$ prayer sha)l )orn 0' >e)ish Ra00i and merchants standing in a little separate group.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pico, Plato, and Albert the Great: the Testimony and Evaluation of Agostino Nifo EDWARD P
    Pico, Plato, and Albert the Great: The Testimony and Evaluation of Agostino Nifo EDWARD P. MAHONEY Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (1463-1494) is without doubt one of the most intriguing figures of the Italian Renaissance. It is thus no surprise that he has attracted the attention of many modern scholars. By reason of the varied interests that are reflected in his writings, contrasting interpretations of Pico have been proposed.1 Our purpose here is not to present a new and different picture of Pico but, rather, to offer a contribution to one fruitful area of research pursued by some recent historians of philosophy, namely, Pico's debt to, and 1. For general presentations of Pico's life and thought, see the classic study of Eugenio Garin, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola: Vita e dottirina (Florence: F. Le Monnier, 1937); Garin's magisterial Storia della filosofia italiana, 2d ed. (Turin: G. Einaudi 1966), 1:458-495. Among more recent general accounts are Pierre-Marie Cordier, Jean Pic de la Mirandole (Paris: Debresse, 1958); Engelbert Monnerjahn, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (Wiesbaden: F. Steiner, 1960); Paul Oskar Kristeller, Eight Philosophers of the Italian Renaissance (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1964), pp. 54-71; Giovanni di Napoli, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola e laproblemaύca dottrinale del suo tempo (Rome: Desclee, 1965); Charles Trinkaus, In Our Image and Likeness (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970), 2:505-526; and Henri de Lubac, Pic de la Mirandole: Etudes et discussions (Paris: Aubier Montaigne, 1974). 165 166 EDWARD P. MAHONEY use of, medieval philosophy in his overall philosophical enterprise.2 Of particular concern will be the influence of Albert the Great on Pico, which can be established by a connection that has apparently not been noticed by Pico's historians.
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION Agostino Nifo Was a Prolific Writer. During His
    INTRODUCTION Agostino Nifo was a prolific writer. During his lifetime, thirty-five works were published, and after his death another five came out. His books appeared in more than one hundred and sixty editions, from to , at Venice, Pavia, Lyon, Paris, Naples, Florence, Augsburg, Bologna, Rome,Leiden,Basel,Marburg,Troyes,Rouen,Parma,andGenoa.1 In , Nifo published De intellectu,themajorworkofhisearly career, touching on questions of philosophical psychology. Based on a detailed assessment of the views of his predecessors, Nifo in this work presented an analysis of the main issues of Peripatetic noetics, namely origin and immortality of the intellect or rational soul, its relation to the body, its unity and parts, the speculative intellect, and intellectual beatitude. Although the bulk of the work was presumably composed in the early s at Padua, there is good evidence that it was completed and drastically reorientated before publication. This introduction offers a cursory view of Peripatetic noetics and the doctrinal context of Nifo’s work, as well as a short analysis of his shift toward anti-Averroism. It also dwells on Nifo’s use of philosophical and other sources, and on the issue of the ‘lost’ works of Siger of Brabant quoted in De intellectu. Subsequently, the general structure of the work, i.e. its main themes and issues, recurring argumentative strategies, and the fortune of the work are discussed. Finally, I present a note on the transcription of this text and on the works quoted or cited by Nifo. The Introduction is followed by an extensive analytical summary ofthe contents of the work.
    [Show full text]
  • Neo-Latin News
    334 SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY NEWS NEO-LATIN NEWS Vol. 50, Nos. 3 & 4. Jointly with SCN. Subscriptions: $15.00 ($20.00 international) for one year; $28.00 ($37.00) for two years; $40.00 ($52.00) for three years. Checks or money orders are payable to Seventeenth-Century News, 4227 TAMU, Col- lege Station, Texas 77843-4227. NLN is the official publica- tion of the American Association for Neo-Latin Studies. Edited by Craig Kallendorf, Texas A&M University; Western European Editor: Gilbert Tournoy, Leuven; Eastern European Editors: Jerzy Axer, Barbara Milewska-Waïbi½ska, and Katarzyna Tomaszuk, Centre for Studies in the Classical Tradi- tion in Poland and East-Central Europe, University of Warsaw. Founding Editors: James R. Naiden, Southern Oregon Univer- sity, and J. Max Patrick, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and Graduate School, New York University. ‘In the Footsteps of the Ancients’: The Origins of Humanism from Lovato to Bruni. By Ronald G. Witt. Studies in Medieval and Reformation Thought, 74. Leiden, Boston, and Cologne: Brill, 2000. xiv + 562 pp. $132. Upon picking up this book for the first time, one is likely to think that the last thing the world needs is another general history of humanism in early Renaissance Italy. This book, however, shows how dangerous it is to rely on first impressions. Scholars who are active in this field have been hearing about Witt’s study for some time before it was actually published–it has been some twenty years in the making–and from this point on it will serve as the standard treatment of its subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributors
    Contributors Anna Akasoy obtained her Ph.D. in Oriental Studies in 2005 from the University of Frankfurt. She has taught Islamic studies at different British universities and held a British Academy postdoctoral fellowship at the University of Oxford. She is currently a visiting research fellow at the Käte Hamburger Kolleg ‘Dynamics in the History of Religions’ at the University of Bochum. Her main interests are the history of the medieval Muslim West, medieval philosophy and Su fi sm and the relationship between Islam and other religions. Michael J.B. Allen is a Distinguished Professor Emeritus at UCLA, a past President of the Renaissance Society of America, and an authority on Renaissance Platonism. His most recent book is Marsilio Ficino, Commentaries on Plato: Volume 1: Phaedrus and Ion , in the Villa I Tatti Series (Cambridge, MA, 2008); and he is currently completing an edition and translation of Ficino’s commentaries on the Pseudo-Dionysius. Amos Bertolacci (Ph.D. in Philosophy and in Near Eastern Languages and Civilization) is Associate Professor of History of Islamic Philosophy at the Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. He is the author of The Reception of Aristotle’s Metaphysics in Avicenna’s Kitāb al-Šifāʾ: A Milestone of Western Metaphysical Thought (Leiden: Brill, 2006), and of an Italian annotated translation of the metaphysics of Avicenna’s Šifāʾ (Torino: UTET, 2007). He has co-edited, with R. Hissette, the Latin translation of Averroes’ Middle Commentary on the Categories (Leuven: Peeters, 2010), and published several studies on the in fl uence of Arabic philosophy in the Latin Middle Ages, with particular regard to Albert the Great.
    [Show full text]
  • Renaissance Aristotelianism OSKAR KRISTELLER, PAUL Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Summer 1965; 6, 2; Proquest Pg
    Renaissance Aristotelianism OSKAR KRISTELLER, PAUL Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Summer 1965; 6, 2; ProQuest pg. 157 Renaissance Aristotelianism Paul Oskar Kristeller HEN we try to understand the historical significance of W Renaissance Aristotelianism, we have to face very great difficulties. The number of its representatives and the variety of their views seems to defy any common description, and this situation is further complicated by the persistent attack to which the school was subjected from different quarters. Moreover, the Aristotel­ ians were in many ways influenced by ideas and methods that origin­ ated outside their own tradition, and on the other hand, most of the avowed opponents of Aristotelianism were more deeply influenced by it than they knew. We must add that Renaissance Aristotelianism has been neglected by most historians and is still unexplored in many of its sectors. Humanism and Platonism have long been considered peculiar to the Renaissance period, and their mediaeval antecedents have but recently received some scholarly attention. Aristotelianism, on the other hand, is so clearly a heritage and continuation of the mediaeval period that most scholars concerned with the Renaissance have tended to treat it as an unimportant residue of the preceding age and have uncritically repeated the charges made against it by its Renaissance opponents, whereas most students of mediaeval philos­ ophy have focused their attention on the twelfth and thirteenth centuries and have tended to sacrifice the supposedly decadent scholasticism of the following centuries to the scorn of its enemies. Thus Renaissance Aristotelianism is a historical phenomenon which we are just beginning to understand in its proper significance.1 The intrinsic importance and historical influence of Aristotle are such an obvious fact that we may be surprised to learn that during the later centuries of classical antiquity his authority and influence were 1 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Translation and Analysis of Two Fragments from Pietro Pomponazzi
    CALIFORNIA STATE LINIVERSITY SAN MARCOS THESIS SIGNATURE PAGE THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULLFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE MASTEROF ARTS IN LITERATURE AND WRITING STUDIES rHESrs rrrlE: Translation & Analysis of Two Fragments by Pietro Pomponazzi AUTHoR: Jay C. Greene DATE OF SUCCESSFUL DEFENSE: 19 April,2013 THE THESIS HAS BEEN ACCEPTED BY THE THESIS COMMITTEE IN PARTIAL FULLFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FORTHE DEGREE OF MASTEROF ARTS Oliver Berghof, Ph.D. 't /'t,\/ zc 13 THESIS COMMITTEE CHAIR DATE Heidi Breuer, Ph.D. ultlttltT wl,c THESIS COMMITTEE MEMBER Eliot Wirshbo, Ph.D. w4.*d* /g THESIS COMMITTEE MEMBER SIGNATURE California State University San Marcos Translation and Analyis of Two Fragments by Pietro Pomponazzi: Utrum definitio animae sit bene assignata & Utrum anima rationalis sit forma substantialis Jay C. Greene Spring 2013 Prefatory Remark At times throughout this project, the word “man” is used to refer to humankind, as in the chapter which includes a discussion of “the Renaissance Philosophy of Man.” The usage of the word “man” in this way can carry a gendered, potentially sexist, connotation, especially in the 21st century. I use this term here, fully conscious of the potential implications, yet by no means with a sexist intention, attempting to draw upon the traditional usage and terminology inherent to the centuries-old historical and philosophical conversation into which I am entering. Generally speaking, I have restricted the use of the word “man” to only include reference to the species as a whole (as in “man’s destiny”), while avoiding its use in cases where the entirely gendered pronouns “he” or “his” would also be used (as in “man and his destiny”), favoring instead a more gender-neutral term like “humanity.” Kristine – Your unfailing support and encouragement in this undertaking, as in life, is more than I can describe in any language.
    [Show full text]
  • Benedetto Varchi on the Soul: Vernacular Aristotelianism Between Reason and Faith
    Benedetto Varchi on the Soul: Vernacular Aristotelianism between Reason and Faith Marco Sgarbi I. INTRODUCTION Benedetto Varchi (1503–65) was one of the most important and complex figures in the Italian intellectual landscape of the sixteenth century. His interests ranged from history to literary criticism, from science to poetry; yet, until recently, his reputation has been based solely upon his interpreta- tion of Dante and Petrarch, his discussion of the ‘‘question of the lan- guage,’’ and his activity generally as a man of letters and pedagogue at the Accademia Fiorentina.1 Very few studies have sought to reconstruct Var- chi’s profile as a philosopher, and most that do—by Bruno Nardi, Eugenio Garin, Cesare Vasoli, and others—have focused on his alleged Averroism.2 1 For an overall account of Varchi’s life, work, and historical context, see Umberto Pirotti, Benedetto Varchi e la cultura del suo tempo (Florence: Olschki, 1971); and Annalisa Andreoni, La via della dottrina. Le lezioni accademiche di Benedetto Varchi (Pisa: ETS, 2012). 2 Cf. Bruno Nardi, Studi su Pietro Pomponazzi (Florence: Le Monnier, 1965), 322–29, 380–82; Giovanni Papuli, ‘‘Benedetto Varchi: logica e poetica,’’ in Studi in onore di Anto- nio Corsano (Manduria: Lacaita, 1970), 527–72; Eugenio Garin, ‘‘Benedetto Varchi e la teoria dell’eterno ritorno,’’ in Umanesimo e Rinascimento. Studi offerti in onore di Paul Oskar Kristeller (Florence: Olschki, 1980), 155–72; Paolo Cherchi, ‘‘Due lezioni di Benedetto Varchi ispirate da J. L. Vives,’’ Lettere Italiane 40 (1988): 387–99; Selene Ballerini, ‘‘Benedetto Varchi aristotelico ficiniano,’’ Misure critiche 21 (1991): 25–42; Cesare Vasoli, ‘‘Benedetto Varchi e i filosofi,’’ Benedetto Varchi 1503–1565, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Seventeenth-Century News NEO-LATIN NEWS
    281 seventeenth-century news NEO-LATIN NEWS Vol. 62, Nos. 3 & 4. Jointly with SCN. NLN is the official publica- tion of the American Association for Neo-Latin Studies. Edited by Craig Kallendorf, Texas A&M University; Western European Editor: Gilbert Tournoy, Leuven; Eastern European Editors: Jerzy Axer, Barbara Milewska-Wazbinska, and Katarzyna Tomaszuk, Centre for Studies in the Classical Tradition in Poland and East- Central Europe, University of Warsaw. Founding Editors: James R. Naiden, Southern Oregon University, and J. Max Patrick, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and Graduate School, New York University. ♦ Res seniles, Libri IX-XII. By Francesco Petrarca. Ed. by Silvia Rizzo, with the collaboration of Monica Berté. Edizione nazionale delle opere di Francesco Petrarca, 2.3. Florence: Casa Editrice Le Lettere, 2014. 430 pp. €40. Improvvisi: una antica raccolta di epigrammi. By Francesco Petrarca. Ed. by Monica Berté. Testi e documenti di let- teratura e di lingua, 36. Rome: Salerno editrice, 2014. LVI + 129 pp. €16. This edition of the letters written by Petrarca in his old age is part of the Edizione nazionale delle opere di Francesco Petrarca. The project began a century ago, with the intention of producing definitive texts of Petrarca’s works. Over the first several decades, little progress was made, with Festa’s edition of the Africa in 1926 being followed by Rossi and Bosco’s Familiares in 1933-1942, Billanovich’s Rerum memorandarum libri in 1945, and Martellotti’s De viris illustribus in 1964. Work was taken up again and reorganized at the end of the twentieth century, in conjunction with the celebration of the seventh centenary of Petrarca’s birth in 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Renaissance Philosophy
    THE CAMBRIDGE COMPANION TO RENAISSANCE PHILOSOPHY EDITED BY JAMES HANKINS Harvard University CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao Paulo Cambridge University Press CONTENTS The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8Ru, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www .cambridge.org Information on this title: www .cambridge.org/9780 52 r 6089 30 © Cambridge University Press 2007 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without List of figures Vll the written permission of Cambridge University Press. Acknowledgments Vlll First published 2007 Notes on contributors IX Chronology Xll Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge r Introduction A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library JAMES HANKINS I Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication data ISBN 978-0-521-84648-6 hardback PART I CONTINUITY AND REVIVAL II ISBN 978-0-521-60893-o paperback 2 The philosopher and Renaissance culture Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for ROBERT BLACK 13 the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication, 3 Humanism, scholasticism, and Renaissance philosophy and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. JAMES HANKINS 30
    [Show full text]
  • 6949 RCOMP 16Th PHILOSOPHY Aacg Adapted 7X10 29/09/2016 11:43 Page 225
    6949 RCOMP 16th PHILOSOPHY_Aacg_adapted 7x10 29/09/2016 11:43 Page 225 1111 2 3 10 4 5 6 THE POMPONAZZI 7 8 AFFAIR 9 1011 1 The Controversy over the 2 3111 Immortality of the Soul 4 5 Leen Spruit 6 7 8 9 20111 1 The issue of the immortality of the soul involves several disciplinary fields, including 2 natural philosophy (psychology as a part of natural science), theology (afterlife), and 3 ethics (individual responsibility of human actors). Although different and contradictory 4 answers have been given to this question in the Western tradition, four doctrinal strands 5 can be traced. 6 First, materialists affirm that man, inasmuch as his body is an organized aggregate of purely 7 material elements, disappears completely when the elements that compose him are dissolved. 8 This is the answer of some Presocratics, Epicurus, the Stoics, and, in the early moden period, 9 Thomas Hobbes, who reduced mental acts to organic functions or to epiphenomena of 30111 matter. 1 Second, for Plato, the soul is a substance in itself that exists prior to being joined to the 2 body, which it moves. It dwells in the body for a certain time but departs at death to take 3 up residence in other bodies, until, thoroughly purified, it is able to return to the world of 4 the ideas. Some of Plato’s later followers viewed the human soul as a particular expression 35 of the cosmic Soul, or as a particle of the World Soul. These authors admit the immortality 6 of the soul, but this immortality is not seen as specifically personal.
    [Show full text]
  • Regula Socratis
    REGULA SOCRATIS: THE REDISCOVERY OF ANCIENT INDUCTION IN EARLY MODERN ENGLAND A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY John P. McCaskey April '(() © Copyright by John P. McCaskey '(() All Rights Reserved ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ——————————————————— Paula Findlen, Principal Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ——————————————————— Jessica Riskin I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ——————————————————— James G. Lennox Approved for the University Committee on Graduate Studies iii Abstract The influence of Sir Francis Bacon on early modern science is widely recognized. His ideas regarding the utility of knowledge, value of observation, and benefits of cooperative research were widely adopted in the seventeenth century. But Bacon believed his chief contribution to the reform of knowledge was not these, but rather his proposal for a new kind of inductive reasoning. His theory of induction, however, is generally not thought to have had significant direct influence on subsequent developments in science. I argue in this dissertation, based on close reading of the relevant texts, that the conventional assessment is hampered by an inadequate understanding of Baconian induction, and that this misunderstanding can be corrected by considering Bacon’s proposal in the historical context in which it was presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Memory. Theories in Ancient, Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy and Medicine
    Special Volume 6 (2016): Space and Knowledge. Topoi Research Group Articles, ed. by Gerd Graßhoff and Michael Meyer, pp. 678–702. Ricardo Julião – Roberto Lo Presti – Dominik Perler – Philip van der Eijk Mapping Memory. Theories in Ancient, Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy and Medicine Edited by Gerd Graßhoff and Michael Meyer, Excellence Cluster Topoi, Berlin eTopoi ISSN 2192-2608 http://journal.topoi.org Except where otherwise noted, content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 Ricardo Julião – Roberto Lo Presti – Dominik Perler – Philip van der Eijk Mapping Memory. Theories in Ancient, Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy and Medicine This paper discusses theories of memory as developed by philosophers and medical writers from Graeco-Roman antiquity, the Middle Ages and the Early Modern period. While philosophers had much to say on the nature of memory and recollection, their epistemo- logical role and their relationship to other functions of the soul, medical writers concen- trated on the anatomy,physiology,pathology and indeed the therapeutics of memory and recollection.Yet the close relationship between philosophical and medical approaches was most clearly visible in discussions about the bodily location of memory,where theoretical concepts of the hierarchy of faculties of the soul were connected with clinical observations of memory failure as a result of injury or disease. Body; epistemology; faculty; medicine; memory; philosophy; soul. 1 Introduction: The background in classical philosophy and medicine Among the functions of the soul identified by ancient philosophers and medical writers, memory and recollection attracted considerable attention from a very early stage.
    [Show full text]