Pharmaceutical Taste Masking Technologies Of
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
America's Number One Fishfinding Brand
AMERICA’S NUMBER ONE FISHFINDING BRAND. Elite Ti2 12 *Number 1 claim based on more professional anglers using Lowrance than all other brands combined. NOW AVAILABLE ON WWW.LOWRANCE.COM TURNS OUT, FISH REALLY DO GROW ON TREES. UNLOCK EVEN MORE INCREDIBLE DETAIL WITH NEW MEGA IMAGING+™ Those aren’t leaves. They’re crappie—plain as day—thanks to the clarity of MEGA Imaging®. Using this high-frequency sonar, you can easily see fish and structure to find productive water more quickly. And with new MEGA Imaging+™, there’s absolutely no place Now search areas up to 200 ft below and left to hide, thanks to extended range and depth, plus 20% more to either side of your boat. Available on select SOLIX® detail than MEGA Imaging. Visit Humminbird.com to learn more. and HELIX® Series models. © 2019 Johnson Outdoors Marine Electronics, Inc. All Rights Reserved. MEGA-FY YOUR NEXT MINN KOTA® MOTOR WITH BUILT-IN MEGA DOWN IMAGING®. With a transducer built right into the motor, you get crystal clear Humminbird® MEGA Down Imaging® and a clean, protected look. So put a bird in your motor – and more fish on your line. minnkotamotors.com/MEGA ©2019 Johnson Outdoors Marine Electronics, Inc. THE BEST LINE FOR any CONDITIONS NEW Super8Slick V2 is now re-engineered to the next level of toughness. With a new eight-end dense weave construction coated with PowerPro’s Enhanced Body Technology (EBT) process, it now delivers all of the smooth, silent benefits of original Super8Slick, plus providing added slickness for longer casts and added abrasion toughness to rip through the heaviest cover. -
MODELLER 10.1 Manual
MODELLER A Program for Protein Structure Modeling Release 10.1, r12156 Andrej Saliˇ with help from Ben Webb, M.S. Madhusudhan, Min-Yi Shen, Guangqiang Dong, Marc A. Martı-Renom, Narayanan Eswar, Frank Alber, Maya Topf, Baldomero Oliva, Andr´as Fiser, Roberto S´anchez, Bozidar Yerkovich, Azat Badretdinov, Francisco Melo, John P. Overington, and Eric Feyfant email: modeller-care AT salilab.org URL https://salilab.org/modeller/ 2021/03/12 ii Contents Copyright notice xxi Acknowledgments xxv 1 Introduction 1 1.1 What is Modeller?............................................. 1 1.2 Modeller bibliography....................................... .... 2 1.3 Obtainingandinstallingtheprogram. .................... 3 1.4 Bugreports...................................... ............ 4 1.5 Method for comparative protein structure modeling by Modeller ................... 5 1.6 Using Modeller forcomparativemodeling. ... 8 1.6.1 Preparinginputfiles . ............. 8 1.6.2 Running Modeller ......................................... 9 2 Automated comparative modeling with AutoModel 11 2.1 Simpleusage ..................................... ............ 11 2.2 Moreadvancedusage............................... .............. 12 2.2.1 Including water molecules, HETATM residues, and hydrogenatoms .............. 12 2.2.2 Changing the default optimization and refinement protocol ................... 14 2.2.3 Getting a very fast and approximate model . ................. 14 2.2.4 Building a model from multiple templates . .................. 15 2.2.5 Buildinganallhydrogenmodel -
Pyplif HIPPOS-Assisted Prediction of Molecular Determinants of Ligand Binding to Receptors
molecules Article PyPLIF HIPPOS-Assisted Prediction of Molecular Determinants of Ligand Binding to Receptors Enade P. Istyastono 1,* , Nunung Yuniarti 2, Vivitri D. Prasasty 3 and Sudi Mungkasi 4 1 Faculty of Pharmacy, Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta 55282, Indonesia 2 Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Biotechnology, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta 12930, Indonesia; [email protected] 4 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta 55282, Indonesia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +62-274883037 Abstract: Identification of molecular determinants of receptor-ligand binding could significantly increase the quality of structure-based virtual screening protocols. In turn, drug design process, especially the fragment-based approaches, could benefit from the knowledge. Retrospective virtual screening campaigns by employing AutoDock Vina followed by protein-ligand interaction finger- printing (PLIF) identification by using recently published PyPLIF HIPPOS were the main techniques used here. The ligands and decoys datasets from the enhanced version of the database of useful de- coys (DUDE) targeting human G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) were employed in this research since the mutation data are available and could be used to retrospectively verify the prediction. The results show that the method presented in this article could pinpoint some retrospectively verified molecular determinants. The method is therefore suggested to be employed as a routine in drug Citation: Istyastono, E.P.; Yuniarti, design and discovery. N.; Prasasty, V.D.; Mungkasi, S. PyPLIF HIPPOS-Assisted Prediction Keywords: PyPLIF HIPPOS; AutoDock Vina; drug discovery; fragment-based; molecular determi- of Molecular Determinants of Ligand Binding to Receptors. -
Open Babel Documentation Release 2.3.1
Open Babel Documentation Release 2.3.1 Geoffrey R Hutchison Chris Morley Craig James Chris Swain Hans De Winter Tim Vandermeersch Noel M O’Boyle (Ed.) December 05, 2011 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Goals of the Open Babel project ..................................... 3 1.2 Frequently Asked Questions ....................................... 4 1.3 Thanks .................................................. 7 2 Install Open Babel 9 2.1 Install a binary package ......................................... 9 2.2 Compiling Open Babel .......................................... 9 3 obabel and babel - Convert, Filter and Manipulate Chemical Data 17 3.1 Synopsis ................................................. 17 3.2 Options .................................................. 17 3.3 Examples ................................................. 19 3.4 Differences between babel and obabel .................................. 21 3.5 Format Options .............................................. 22 3.6 Append property values to the title .................................... 22 3.7 Filtering molecules from a multimolecule file .............................. 22 3.8 Substructure and similarity searching .................................. 25 3.9 Sorting molecules ............................................ 25 3.10 Remove duplicate molecules ....................................... 25 3.11 Aliases for chemical groups ....................................... 26 4 The Open Babel GUI 29 4.1 Basic operation .............................................. 29 4.2 Options ................................................. -
GROMACS: Fast, Flexible, and Free
GROMACS: Fast, Flexible, and Free DAVID VAN DER SPOEL,1 ERIK LINDAHL,2 BERK HESS,3 GERRIT GROENHOF,4 ALAN E. MARK,4 HERMAN J. C. BERENDSEN4 1Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, Box 596, S-75124 Uppsala, Sweden 2Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, SCFAB, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden 3Max-Planck Institut fu¨r Polymerforschung, Ackermannweg 10, D-55128 Mainz, Germany 4Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, NL-9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands Received 12 February 2005; Accepted 18 March 2005 DOI 10.1002/jcc.20291 Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). Abstract: This article describes the software suite GROMACS (Groningen MAchine for Chemical Simulation) that was developed at the University of Groningen, The Netherlands, in the early 1990s. The software, written in ANSI C, originates from a parallel hardware project, and is well suited for parallelization on processor clusters. By careful optimization of neighbor searching and of inner loop performance, GROMACS is a very fast program for molecular dynamics simulation. It does not have a force field of its own, but is compatible with GROMOS, OPLS, AMBER, and ENCAD force fields. In addition, it can handle polarizable shell models and flexible constraints. The program is versatile, as force routines can be added by the user, tabulated functions can be specified, and analyses can be easily customized. Nonequilibrium dynamics and free energy determinations are incorporated. Interfaces with popular quantum-chemical packages (MOPAC, GAMES-UK, GAUSSIAN) are provided to perform mixed MM/QM simula- tions. The package includes about 100 utility and analysis programs. -
Secondary Structure Propensities in Peptide Folding Simulations: a Systematic Comparison of Molecular Mechanics Interaction Schemes
Biophysical Journal Volume 97 July 2009 599–608 599 Secondary Structure Propensities in Peptide Folding Simulations: A Systematic Comparison of Molecular Mechanics Interaction Schemes Dirk Matthes and Bert L. de Groot* Department of Theoretical and Computational Biophysics, Computational Biomolecular Dynamics Group, Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Go¨ttingen, Germany ABSTRACT We present a systematic study directed toward the secondary structure propensity and sampling behavior in peptide folding simulations with eight different molecular dynamics force-field variants in explicit solvent. We report on the combi- national result of force field, water model, and electrostatic interaction schemes and compare to available experimental charac- terization of five studied model peptides in terms of reproduced structure and dynamics. The total simulation time exceeded 18 ms and included simulations that started from both folded and extended conformations. Despite remaining sampling issues, a number of distinct trends in the folding behavior of the peptides emerged. Pronounced differences in the propensity of finding prominent secondary structure motifs in the different applied force fields suggest that problems point in particular to the balance of the relative stabilities of helical and extended conformations. INTRODUCTION Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are routinely utilized to that study, simulations of relatively short lengths were per- study the folding dynamics of peptides and small proteins as formed and the natively folded state was used as starting well as biomolecular aggregation. The critical constituents of point, possibly biasing the results (13). such molecular mechanics studies are the validity of the under- For folding simulations, such a systematic test has not lyingphysical models together with theassumptionsofclassical been carried out so far, although with growing computer dynamics and a sufficient sampling of the conformational power several approaches toward the in silico folding space. -
A Web-Based 3D Molecular Structure Editor and Visualizer Platform
Mohebifar and Sajadi J Cheminform (2015) 7:56 DOI 10.1186/s13321-015-0101-7 SOFTWARE Open Access Chemozart: a web‑based 3D molecular structure editor and visualizer platform Mohamad Mohebifar* and Fatemehsadat Sajadi Abstract Background: Chemozart is a 3D Molecule editor and visualizer built on top of native web components. It offers an easy to access service, user-friendly graphical interface and modular design. It is a client centric web application which communicates with the server via a representational state transfer style web service. Both client-side and server-side application are written in JavaScript. A combination of JavaScript and HTML is used to draw three-dimen- sional structures of molecules. Results: With the help of WebGL, three-dimensional visualization tool is provided. Using CSS3 and HTML5, a user- friendly interface is composed. More than 30 packages are used to compose this application which adds enough flex- ibility to it to be extended. Molecule structures can be drawn on all types of platforms and is compatible with mobile devices. No installation is required in order to use this application and it can be accessed through the internet. This application can be extended on both server-side and client-side by implementing modules in JavaScript. Molecular compounds are drawn on the HTML5 Canvas element using WebGL context. Conclusions: Chemozart is a chemical platform which is powerful, flexible, and easy to access. It provides an online web-based tool used for chemical visualization along with result oriented optimization for cloud based API (applica- tion programming interface). JavaScript libraries which allow creation of web pages containing interactive three- dimensional molecular structures has also been made available. -
Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Drug Discovery and Pharmaceutical Development
processes Review Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Drug Discovery and Pharmaceutical Development Outi M. H. Salo-Ahen 1,2,* , Ida Alanko 1,2, Rajendra Bhadane 1,2 , Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin 3,* , Rodrigo Vargas Honorato 3, Shakhawath Hossain 4 , André H. Juffer 5 , Aleksei Kabedev 4, Maija Lahtela-Kakkonen 6, Anders Støttrup Larsen 7, Eveline Lescrinier 8 , Parthiban Marimuthu 1,2 , Muhammad Usman Mirza 8 , Ghulam Mustafa 9, Ariane Nunes-Alves 10,11,* , Tatu Pantsar 6,12, Atefeh Saadabadi 1,2 , Kalaimathy Singaravelu 13 and Michiel Vanmeert 8 1 Pharmaceutical Sciences Laboratory (Pharmacy), Åbo Akademi University, Tykistökatu 6 A, Biocity, FI-20520 Turku, Finland; ida.alanko@abo.fi (I.A.); rajendra.bhadane@abo.fi (R.B.); parthiban.marimuthu@abo.fi (P.M.); atefeh.saadabadi@abo.fi (A.S.) 2 Structural Bioinformatics Laboratory (Biochemistry), Åbo Akademi University, Tykistökatu 6 A, Biocity, FI-20520 Turku, Finland 3 Faculty of Science-Chemistry, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands; [email protected] 4 Swedish Drug Delivery Forum (SDDF), Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala Biomedical Center, Uppsala University, 751 23 Uppsala, Sweden; [email protected] (S.H.); [email protected] (A.K.) 5 Biocenter Oulu & Faculty of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Oulu, Aapistie 7 A, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland; andre.juffer@oulu.fi 6 School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, FI-70210 Kuopio, Finland; maija.lahtela-kakkonen@uef.fi (M.L.-K.); tatu.pantsar@uef.fi -
Quantitative Evaluation of Dissociation Mechanisms in Phenolphthalein and the Related Compounds
J. Comput. Chem. Jpn., Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 13–21 (2016) ©2016 Society of Computer Chemistry, Japan Technical Paper Quantitative Evaluation of Dissociation Mechanisms in Phenolphthalein and the Related Compounds Toshihiko HANAI Health Research Foundation, Research Institute for Production Development 4F, 15 Shimogamo-morimoto-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-0805, Japan e-mail: [email protected] (Received: October 11, 2015; Accepted for publication: April 14, 2016; Online publication: May 6, 2016) Computational chemistry programs were evaluated as aids to teaching qualitative analytical chemistry. Compu- tational chemical calculations can predict absorption spectra, thus enabling the modeling of indicator dissociation mechanisms by different computational chemical programs using a personal computer. An updated MNDO program among 51 programs was found to be the best predictor to explain the dissociation mechanisms of isobenzofuranones and sulfonephthaleins. Unknown dissociation constants were predicted from atomic partial charges instead of Ham- mett's constants. Keywords: Quantitative analysis of dissociation mechanisms, Isobenzofuranone, Sulfonephthalein, Computational chemistry 1 Introduction the absorption wavelength and electron density changes were not well described. The dissociation mechanisms, maximum How to quantitatively teach qualitative analytical chemistry is wavelengths, and electron density maps of isobenzofuranones a very important subject for analytical chemists. Previously, a and sulfonephthaleins were, therefore, evaluated by in silico method to teach molecular interaction mechanisms in chroma- analysis despite the anticipated poor precision. The experimen- tography was quantitatively achieved using molecular mechan- tally measured dissociation of phenolphthalein is described ics and MOPAC programs [1]. Furthermore, the reaction mech- using four dissociation structures, where the ionization of two anisms of highly sensitive detections were also quantitatively phenolic hydroxyl groups converts the neutral molecular form described [2,3]. -
Evaluation of Protein-Ligand Docking Methods on Peptide-Ligand
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/212514; this version posted November 1, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Evaluation of protein-ligand docking methods on peptide-ligand complexes for docking small ligands to peptides Sandeep Singh1#, Hemant Kumar Srivastava1#, Gaurav Kishor1#, Harinder Singh1, Piyush Agrawal1 and G.P.S. Raghava1,2* 1CSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39A, Chandigarh, India. 2Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, Okhla Phase III, Delhi India #Authors Contributed Equally Emails of Authors: SS: [email protected] HKS: [email protected] GK: [email protected] HS: [email protected] PA: [email protected] * Corresponding author Professor of Center for Computation Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology (IIIT Delhi), Okhla Phase III, New Delhi-110020, India Phone: +91-172-26907444 Fax: +91-172-26907410 E-mail: [email protected] Running Title: Benchmarking of docking methods 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/212514; this version posted November 1, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. ABSTRACT In the past, many benchmarking studies have been performed on protein-protein and protein-ligand docking however there is no study on peptide-ligand docking. -
A Comparative Study of the Efficiency of HCV NS3/4A Protease Drugs
Life Sciences 217 (2019) 176–184 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Life Sciences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/lifescie A comparative study of the efficiency of HCV NS3/4A protease drugs against different HCV genotypes using in silico approaches T ⁎ Ahmed A. Ezat , Wael M. Elshemey Biophysics Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, 12613 Giza, Egypt ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Aims: To investigate the efficacy of Direct Acting Antivirals (DAAs) in the treatment of different Hepatitis C HCV Virus (HCV) genotypes. NS3/4A protease Main methods: Homology modeling is used to predict the 3D structures of different genotypes while molecular Molecular docking docking is employed to predict genotype – drug interactions (Binding Mode) and binding free energy (Docking Homology modeling Score). Key findings: Simeprevir (TMC435) and to a lesser degree MK6325 are the best drugs among the studied drugs. The predicted affinity of drugs against genotype 1a is always better than other genotypes. P2–P4 macrocyclic drugs show better performance against genotypes 2, 3 and 5. Macrocyclic drugs are better than linear drugs. Significance: HCV is one of the major health problems worldwide. Until the discovery of DAAs, HCV treatment faced many failures. DAAs target key functional machines of the virus life cycle and shut it down. NS3/4A protease is an important target and several drugs have been designed to inhibit its functions. There are several NS3/4A protease drugs approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Unfortunately, the virus exhibits resistance against these drugs. This study is significant in elucidating that no one drug is able to treat different genotypes with the same efficiency. -
Parameterizing a Novel Residue
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Luthey-Schulten Group, Department of Chemistry Theoretical and Computational Biophysics Group Computational Biophysics Workshop Parameterizing a Novel Residue Rommie Amaro Brijeet Dhaliwal Zaida Luthey-Schulten Current Editors: Christopher Mayne Po-Chao Wen February 2012 CONTENTS 2 Contents 1 Biological Background and Chemical Mechanism 4 2 HisH System Setup 7 3 Testing out your new residue 9 4 The CHARMM Force Field 12 5 Developing Topology and Parameter Files 13 5.1 An Introduction to a CHARMM Topology File . 13 5.2 An Introduction to a CHARMM Parameter File . 16 5.3 Assigning Initial Values for Unknown Parameters . 18 5.4 A Closer Look at Dihedral Parameters . 18 6 Parameter generation using SPARTAN (Optional) 20 7 Minimization with new parameters 32 CONTENTS 3 Introduction Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are a powerful scientific tool used to study a wide variety of systems in atomic detail. From a standard protein simulation, to the use of steered molecular dynamics (SMD), to modelling DNA-protein interactions, there are many useful applications. With the advent of massively parallel simulation programs such as NAMD2, the limits of computational anal- ysis are being pushed even further. Inevitably there comes a time in any molecular modelling scientist’s career when the need to simulate an entirely new molecule or ligand arises. The tech- nique of determining new force field parameters to describe these novel system components therefore becomes an invaluable skill. Determining the correct sys- tem parameters to use in conjunction with the chosen force field is only one important aspect of the process.