DOCSLIB.ORG

Delegation for Relations with the Mashreq Countries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Delegation for Relations with the Mashreq Countries Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries 8TH IPM EP - LEBANON 6-11 April 2009 Report by Ms Béatrice PATRIE, Chair of the Delegation CR\782206EN.doc PE424.296 EN EN TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................... 1 Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries............................................... 1 8TH IPM EP - LEBANON ......................................................................................... 1 6-11 April 2009 ............................................................................................................ 1 I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................... 3 II. POLITICAL MEETINGS.................................................................................. 3 1. Meeting with the President, General Michel Sleimane...................................... 3 2. Meeting with Prime Minister Siniora.................................................................. 3 3. Meeting with Nabih Berry, President of the Parliament................................... 4 4. Meeting with Samir Geagea ................................................................................. 5 5. Meeting with Mohammed Raad, head of the Hezbollah parliamentary block5 6. Meeting with Walid Joumblatt and Marwan Hamadé...................................... 6 7. Meeting with Michel Aoun ................................................................................... 6 8. Meeting with Saad Hariri, Leader of the Future Movement ............................ 7 EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT .................................................................................... 8 PE424.296 2/13 CR\782206EN.doc EN I. INTRODUCTION The trip took place a good half year after the visit by a Lebanese parliamentary delegation to Brussels, which can be seen as testament to the role the EP Mashreq delegation accords to its relations with Lebanon. As usual, the working party held talks with all political leaders. The timing of the visit was all the more opportune in that elections would be held in Lebanon in June. The working party was able to find out how the election preparations were progressing. At the express request of the Lebanese, a Commission and EP delegation would be involved in observing the elections. When the programme was being drawn up, the Lebanese ambassador in Belgium had suggested a meeting with the leadership of Hezbollah, but this did not unfortunately take place despite intensive contacts that even continued after the delegation's arrival. The working party did, however, have the opportunity to meet the head of the Hezbollah parliamentary block who spoke of the importance of dialogue with his organisation. II. POLITICAL MEETINGS 1. Meeting with the President, General Michel Sleimane The President highlighted, first of all, the importance of the Doha Agreement which had made it possible to achieve reconciliation among the Arab countries and between the different groups within Lebanon. One particularly important aspect was the relationship between Syria and Lebanon, as an exchange of ambassadors had been agreed upon for the first time in their history. The President emphasised that there were fraternal and friendly relations between the two countries, but that the independence of both countries had to be respected. The fate of the Arab peace initiative had also been discussed in Doha. It had been thanks to this initiative that there was still a basis for negotiations with Israel; many Arab countries had wanted to retract it. He was happy with the internal situation in Lebanon: the economic situation was stable, and the security situation satisfactory as the Army was doing its job. He was cautiously optimistic about the elections. The electoral law had introduced some reforms, but these were not yet enough. All religious denominations could also now be found in the different political camps, with the exception of the Shiites who were only represented in one political entity. He was grateful for the EU's support, as it had always stood on the side of an independent Lebanon. 2. Meeting with Prime Minister Siniora In his introduction, he referred in particular to the special political situation in Lebanon which had been affected by the unresolved Palestinian issue for some 60 years. Despite all the problems in the region, Lebanon stood for democracy, openness and the rule of law. CR\782206EN.doc 3/13 PE424.296 EN On top of the complicated political background, there was also the difficult socio-economic situation. If improvements were not made here, there was a danger of widespread radicalisation in society. It was therefore his aim to use investment in the transport infrastructure, education, the health system and environmental protection to create jobs. All this would involve the municipalities more than before, thus also sending out the right signal. He would be presenting a programme for this work in the coming weeks, which could be the basis on which the next Government would work. The security situation was still very tense although some progress had been made. The Government was alarmed at the recent assassination of a prominent Palestinian leader. Whilst the national unity government was very important, it was unacceptable that a minority in the Cabinet should be able to block all decisions. This had not been the case with the previous government, so the new government should go back to the former principles. He felt that good relations with neighbouring Syria were particularly important, but these had to be characterised by mutual respect. Diplomatic relations were the first step, and others needed to follow such as the mutual recognition of borders and an end to arms smuggling. The Arab peace initiative, which dealt with future relations with Israel, had not been represented very effectively by the Arab countries. They also now questioned the point of this initiative, especially since Israel had never really responded to it. The Israeli government had been described as moderate, even though Israeli troops had entered Lebanon twice and there were regular incursions into Lebanese airspace. What was now to be expected of the new Israeli government? If it were to act as the new Foreign Minister proclaimed, this would have wide- reaching consequences for the region. Lebanon should not give up its independence for the sake of another country, be that country Syria, Iran, Saudi Arabia, the USA, France or Israel. He meant it when he said: if Lebanon did not exist, it would have to be created. 3. Meeting with Nabih Berry, President of the Parliament The President quickly ran through the latest political developments: Lebanon had come through one of its most serious crises, and a way forward had been found thanks to the Doha Agreement. He considered the unresolved issues to be the disarming of Hezbollah and ridding Parliament of sectarianism. He therefore advocated implementation of the Taef Agreement which made provision for a second Chamber that would deal exclusively with religious and cultural issues. In the field of education, he was in favour of using the same history books in all schools and lessons in citizenship. He did not expect any great changes as an outcome of the elections. During the war in Gaza, his organisation, Amal, and Hezbollah had put pressure on Hamas to stop firing missiles at Israeli towns. PE424.296 4/13 CR\782206EN.doc EN 4. Meeting with Samir Geagea Samir Geagea was also in favour of the new electoral law, even though it was not ideal. Opinion polls suggested that the March 14 Alliance could obtain a majority. There was considerable tension within the Christian camp, as Christians belonged to two different alliances: the March 14 Alliance and the March 8 Alliance. It was possible to speak with Hezbollah, which belonged to the March 8 Alliance, but not with Michel Aoun, as he went so far as to criticise the patriarch. With regard to the regional context, he considered it important to break out of the vicious circle of Arab-Israeli conflict as soon as possible. He recognised the danger of several countries in the region one day possessing nuclear weapons. As Israel and the Palestinians were incapable of finding a solution to the conflict by themselves, a powerful broker had to be found. There was, however, not much time left. He was sceptical concerning the elections in Iran. These were not proper elections as they would not lead to any great change. The real power lay with the religious leader, Khamenei. 5. Meeting with Mohammed Raad, head of the Hezbollah parliamentary block At the outset of the discussions, Mr Raad welcomed the Delegation's desire to set up this meeting. His organisation's only wish was for dialogue, but the EU had unfortunately refused to engage in this dialogue up until now. In an international context, there had been a significant change with the election of the new US President. His organisation was monitoring developments very closely but had not yet detected any change with regard to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the relationship between the USA and Iran. On a regional level, he was very critical of the fact that some political systems were outdated and had nothing new to offer. There was a danger that they would establish contact with Israel and thus undermine peace talks. Israel was neither willing nor able to pursue peace. Israel was a threat to peace in the region, as it still occupied not just Palestinian, but also other Arab, lands. Despite
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “Shutting out Hezbollah in Its Entirety Will Destabilize the Lebanese
    CLAIM “Shutting out Hezbollah in its entirety will destabilize the Lebanese government, in which Hezbollah and its allies gained a vast majority of the popular vote in parliamentary elections, making it one of the most effective fighting forces against the Islamic State group.” SHORT RESPONSE HEZBOLLAH IS THE DESTABILIZER IN THE LEBANESE GOVERNMENT AND HAS DONE LITTLE TO DEFEAT THE ISLAMIC STATE. INSTEAD, IT ASPIRES TO BECOME SOMETHING SIMILAR. THE FACTS The struggle to reduce the capabilities of a terrorist organization is ongoing, multi-dimensional, and requires a great deal of determination. A terrorist organization such as Hezbollah, which operates simultaneously as a terrorist organization and within the framework of the Lebanese political system as a “legitimate party,” relies on civilian infrastructure, living spaces, and sources of funding. It carries out profit and loss considerations on an ongoing basis. Reducing Hezbollah’s capabilities and influence must be achieved by exerting pressure on the organization — directly and indirectly. The key to this is international cooperation and the mobilization of political elements in the government to reduce Hezbollah’s power. SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT ON HEZBOLLAH A Joint Project by AJC and the International Institute for Counter-Terrorism KEY DETAILS WHAT DOES IT REALLY MEAN TO Î For years, an alliance between the Christian camp and the DESIGNATE HEZBOLLAH? Sunnis controlled the centers of power in the Lebanese The significance of designating Hezbollah as a terrorist political system. organization primarily derives from the entities that carry Î The assassination of Rafic Hariri, the Syrian withdrawal out the designation. The list of countries that have made the from Lebanon, Hezbollah’s entry into the government, designated Hezbollah a terrorist organization include: and especially the rivalry in the Christian camp led to the consolidation of new political dynamics, including an alliance Israel 1982 between President Michel Aoun from the Christian camp and Hezbollah.
    [Show full text]
  • A Main Document V202
    ABSTRACT Title of dissertation: TELEVISION NEWS AND THE STATE IN LEBANON Jad P. Melki, Doctor of Philosophy, 2008 Dissertation directed by: Professor Susan D. Moeller College of Journalism This dissertation studies the relationship between television news and the state in Lebanon. It utilizes and reworks New Institutionalism theory by adding aspects of Mitchell’s state effect and other concepts devised from Carey and Foucault. The study starts with a macro-level analysis outlining the major cultural, economic and political factors that influenced the evolution of television news in that country. It then moves to a mezzo-level analysis of the institutional arrangements, routines and practices that dominated the news production process. Finally, it zooms in to a micro-level analysis of the final product of Lebanese broadcast news, focusing on the newscast, its rundown and scripts and the smaller elements that make up the television news story. The study concludes that the highly fragmented Lebanese society generated a similarly fragmented and deeply divided political/economic elite, which used its resources and access to the news media to solidify its status and, by doing so, recreated and confirmed the politico-sectarian divide in this country. In this vicious cycle, the institutionalized and instrumentalized television news played the role of mediator between the elites and their fragmented constituents, and simultaneously bolstered the political and economic power of the former while keeping the latter tightly held in their grip. The hard work and values of the individual journalist were systematically channeled through this powerful institutional mechanism and redirected to serve the top of the hierarchy.
    [Show full text]
  • Hezbollah Submission
    Submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security on its Review of the Re-listing of Hezbollah’s External Security Organisation under the Criminal Code Act 1995 Dr. Colin Rubenstein AM Executive Director, Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council Introduction This document forms the submission by the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC) to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security (JCIS) on the re-listing of Hezbollah’s External Security Organisation (ESO) under the Criminal Code Act 1995. This document recommends the JCIS approve the re-listing of Hezbollah’s ESO as a terrorist organisation. It further recommends the JCIS to recommend to the Attorney General that the entire Hezbollah organisation, not simply the ESO, be designated a terrorist organisation. It suggests the JCIS makes this recommendation for three reasons: 1. Hezbollah’s leaders have claimed on numerous occasions that while the West makes a distinction between the political and paramilitary wings of Hezbollah, the organisation itself makes no such distinction; 2. Further, the organisation as a whole continues to meet the definition of a terrorist organisation as defined by Australian federal legislation, principally the Criminal Code Act 1995, sections 102.1 and 102.1A; 3. Finally, as an Australian Federal Parliamentary Library Research Note points out, since late 2001 it has been a criminal offence under the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations Act 1945 and the Charter of the United Nations (Terrorism and Dealings with Assets) Regulations 2002, to fund or resource the group. Together, this legislation ratifies Australia’s obligation under UN Security Council Resolution 1373 to suppress the financing of terrorism1.
    [Show full text]
  • Lebanon: Background and U.S. Relations
    Lebanon: Background and U.S. Relations Casey L. Addis Analyst in Middle Eastern Affairs February 1, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R40054 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Lebanon: Background and U.S. Relations Summary Lebanon is a religiously diverse country transitioning toward independence and democratic consolidation after a ruinous civil war and the subsequent Syrian and Israeli occupations. The United States and Lebanon have historically enjoyed a good relationship due in part to cultural and religious ties; the democratic character of the state; a large, Lebanese-American community in the United States; and the pro-western orientation of Lebanon, particularly during the cold war. Current policy priorities of the United States include strengthening the weak democratic institutions of the state, limiting the influence of Iran, Syria, and others in Lebanon’s political process, and countering threats from Hezbollah and other militant groups in Lebanon. Following Syrian withdrawal from Lebanon in 2005 and the war between Israel and Hezbollah in the summer of 2006, the Bush Administration requested and Congress appropriated a significant increase in U.S. assistance to Lebanon. Since 2006, U.S. assistance to Lebanon has topped $1 billion total over three years, including for the first time U.S. security assistance for the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) and Internal Security Forces (ISF) of Lebanon. Several key issues in U.S.-Lebanon relations could potentially affect future U.S. assistance to Lebanon. The scope and influence of foreign actors, primarily Syria and Iran; unresolved territorial disputes; concerns about extremist groups operating in Lebanon; and potential indictments by the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) are among the challenges facing the Lebanese government and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • State Fragility in Lebanon: Proximate Causes and Sources of Resilience
    APRIL 2018 State fragility in Lebanon: Proximate causes and sources of resilience Bilal Malaeb This report is part of an initiative by the International Growth Centre’s Commission on State Fragility, Growth and Development. While every effort has been made to ensure this is an evidence-based report, limited data availability necessitated the use of media reports and other sources. The opinions in this report do not necessarily represent those of the IGC, the Commission, or the institutions to which I belong. Any errors remain my own. Bilal Malaeb University of Oxford and University of Southampton [email protected] About the commission The LSE-Oxford Commission on State Fragility, Growth and Development was launched in March 2017 to guide policy to address state fragility. The commission, established under the auspices of the International Growth Centre, is sponsored by LSE and University of Oxford’s Blavatnik School of Government. It is funded from the LSE KEI Fund and the British Academy’s Sustainable Development Programme through the Global Challenges Research Fund. Cover photo: Fogline Studio/Getty 2 State fragility in Lebanon: Proximate causes and sources of resilience Contents Introduction 4 State (il)legitimacy 9 Ineffective state with limited capacity 15 The private sector: A source of resilience 22 Security 26 Resilience 29 Conclusion and policy recommendations 30 References 36 3 State fragility in Lebanon: Proximate causes and sources of resilience Introduction Lebanon is an Arab-Mediterranean country that has endured a turbulent past and continues to suffer its consequences. The country enjoys a strong private sector and resilient communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Produced by the Human Security Centre Lead Author
    1 Human Security Centre – Written evidence (AFG0019) Produced by the Human Security Centre Lead Author: Simon Schofield, Senior Fellow, In consultation with Rohullah Yakobi, Associate Fellow 2 1 Table of Contents 2. Executive Summary .............................................................................5 3. What is the Human Security Centre?.....................................................10 4. Geopolitics and National Interests and Agendas......................................11 Islamic Republic of Pakistan ...................................................................11 Historical Context...............................................................................11 Pakistan’s Strategy.............................................................................12 Support for the Taliban .......................................................................13 Afghanistan as a terrorist training camp ................................................16 Role of military aid .............................................................................17 Economic interests .............................................................................19 Conclusion – Pakistan .........................................................................19 Islamic Republic of Iran .........................................................................20 Historical context ...............................................................................20 Iranian Strategy ................................................................................23
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper 2006/29
    EUI WORKING PAPERS RSCAS No. 2006/29 Lebanese Politics of Nationality and Emigration Thibaut Jaulin EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Mediterranean Programme Series jaulin cov.indd 1 19/09/2006 12:02:40 EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE, FLORENCE ROBERT SCHUMAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES Lebanese Politics of Nationality and Emigration THIBAUT JAULIN EUI Working Paper RSCAS No. 2006/29 BADIA FIESOLANA, SAN DOMENICO DI FIESOLE (FI) © 2006 Thibaut Jaulin This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Any additional reproduction for such purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, require the consent of the author. Requests should be addressed directly to the author. See contact details at end of text. If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author, the title, the working paper, or other series, the year and the publisher. Any reproductions for other purposes require the consent of the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies. The author should inform the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies at the EUI if the paper will be published elsewhere and also take responsibility for any consequential obligation(s). ISSN 1028-3625 Printed in Italy in September 2006 European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50016 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy http://www.iue.it/RSCAS/Publications/ http://cadmus.iue.it/dspace/index.jsp Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies carries out disciplinary and interdisciplinary research in the areas of European integration and public policy in Europe. It hosts the annual European Forum.
    [Show full text]
  • Lebanon in the Syrian Quagmire
    Lebanon in the Syrian Quagmire: Fault-Lines, Resilience and Possible Futures Ishac Diwan, Paris Sciences et Lettres Youssef Chaitani, UN ESCWA Working Paper for Discussion The purpose of this paper is to examine the weaknesses and strengths of Lebanon amidst the tensions created by the Syrian conflict that started in 2011. Lebanon’s sectarian governance system has been over 150 years in the making. But the Syrian fire next door, which has taken an increasing sectarian nature, is likely to burn for a long time. With such dire prospects, what is the fate of Lebanon’s governance system? Will it lead the country inexorably towards civil strife? The Lebanese governance system could be described as a horizontal deal among communal oligarchs, supported by vertical organizations within each community. While oligarchs have changed over time, the system itself survived devastating civil wars, endured extensive global and regional influences, and was also undeterred by the projection of power by many external forces, including the Palestinian Liberation Organization, Syria, Iran and Israel. What are the forces at work that make the Lebanese governance system both resilient and resistant to change? In the paper, we use as an analytical framework, which is introduced in section one, the model of limited orders developed by Douglas North and his associates. In section two, we argue that the Syrian civil war is likely to be long lasting. Section three examines the weaknesses and fault-lines of the Lebanese system in light of the Syrian war. Section four explores the factors that continue to contribute to the strength and resilience of Lebanon in spite of the rise in extremist Islamic militancy.
    [Show full text]
  • A Snapshot of Parliamentary Election Results
    ا rلeمtركnزe اCل لبeنsانneي aلbلeدرLا eساThت LCPS for Policy Studies r e p A Snapshot of Parliamentary a 9 1 0 P 2 l i Election Results r y p A c i l Sami Atallah and Sami Zoughaib o P Founded in 1989, the Lebanese Center for Policy Studies is a Beirut-based independent, non-partisan think tank whose mission is to produce and advocate policies that improve good governance in fields such as oil and gas, economic development, public finance, and decentralization. Copyright© 2019 The Lebanese Center for Policy Studies Designed by Polypod Executed by Dolly Harouny Sadat Tower, Tenth Floor P.O.B 55-215, Leon Street, Ras Beirut, Lebanon T: + 961 1 79 93 01 F: + 961 1 79 93 02 [email protected] www.lcps-lebanon.org A Snapshot of Parliamentary Election Results 1 1 Sami Atallah and Sami Zoughaib The authors would like to thank John McCabe, Ned Whalley, Hayat Sheik, Josee Bilezikjian, Georgia Da gher, and Ayman Tibi for their contributions to this paper. Sami Atallah Sami Atallah is the director of the Lebanese Center for Policy Studies (LCPS). He is currently leading several policy studies on youth social identity and political engagement, electoral behavior, political and social sectarianism, and the role of municipalities in dealing with the refugee crisis. He is the co-editor of Democracy, Decentralization, and Service Delivery in the Arab World (with Mona Harb, Beirut, LCPS 2015), co-editor of The Future of Oil in Lebanon: Energy, Politics, and Economic Growth (with Bassam Fattouh, I.B. Tauris, 2018), and co-editor of The Lebanese Parliament 2009-2018: From Illegal Extensions to Vacuum (with Nayla Geagea, 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Lebanon: a Consociational Model to Be Refined
    ISSUE BRIEF 10.15.18 Lebanon: A Consociational Model to be Refined Maria Tannous, Lebanese American University As conflicts continue to rage throughout required to achieve a stable political process the Middle East in the wake of the 2010 and accommodate the concerns of sectarian Arab uprising, divisions across ethnic and groups (Hudson 1997, 106). religious lines in several regional countries In light of this renewed attention on have brought consociational models of the Lebanese model, it is necessary to governance back into the spotlight. In an re-evaluate Lebanon’s consociational system effort to reconcile inter-group conflicts and in order to gauge whether it would be useful regulate power sharing in the region, public for other countries in the region experiencing discussions have highlighted the role of similar ethnic or religious divisions. consociational arrangements in resolving conflict in Lebanon. Lebanon has 18 officially recognized sects. Under the Lebanese THE TAIF AGREEMENT consociational system, agreement among The Taif Agreement was meant to restore the leaders of the major sects (Sunni, Shia, the consociational model as the country’s and Maronite) is required to pass a policy, governing mechanism and reduce approve an official’s appointment, convene institutionalized sectarianism. It was verbally parliament, or for a president to be elected agreed that the president of Lebanon must (i.e., parliament does not convene and be a Maronite, the prime minister a Sunni, elections are not held unless the sects agree and the speaker of parliament a Shia. To In light of this renewed on the winning candidate in advance). The this end, the accord tasked the Chamber of attention on the Lebanese model, or the “Lebanese formula” Deputies with organizing a national dialogue as described by Hudson (1997, 107), has Lebanese model, on the country’s political transition.
    [Show full text]
  • Arab Racism Islamo Fascism Just Another Wordpress.Com Weblog
    Arab racism Islamo fascism Just another WordPress.com weblog Posts Tagged ‘White Shirts’ search this site Pages » About Archives Islam Uber Alles? :: Does Islam and Shariah Have More In » April 2012 Common With Nazi Ideology Than With Religion » March 2012 December 1, 2010 » February 2012 » January 2012 Islam Uber Alles? » December 2011 » November 2011 Does Islam and Shariah Have More In Common With Nazi Ideology » October 2011 Than With Religion? » September 2011 » August 2011 By Steven Simpson Monday, October 11, 2010 » July 2011 » June 2011 Since the atrocities committed on 9/11/01 by Middle Eastern Muslim » May 2011 terrorists in the name of Islam, people in the U.S. and West have » April 2011 debated whether Islam is “a religion of peace” or more of an all- » March 2011 encompassing totalitarian ideology cloaked in religious garb. » February 2011 Unfortunately, it appears that the Qur’an, Shariah, and the Islamic » January 2011 terrorist attacks of the last thirty years, indicate that Islam is indeed a » December 2010 totalitarian ideology engaged in an effort of world-wide conquest much » November 2010 like Nazism. The major difference being that Nazism was based on » October 2010 racial affiliation while Islam is based on religious affiliation. » September 2010 » August 2010 The word “Islam” – contrary to popular belief – means “submission” » July 2010 and not “peace.” When Islam was founded by Muhammad ibn Abdallah » June 2010 in the 7th century, it conquered the Arabian Peninsula through bloody » May 2010 » April 2010 wars and conquests against fellow Arabs, and Jewish tribes. After the » March 2010 consolidation of Islam in Arabia, the Arabs quickly moved out to » February 2010 conquer the Persian and Byzantine empires, as well as parts of India, » January 2010 and subsequently Spain.
    [Show full text]
  • The Specter of Sunni Military Mobilization in Lebanon
    The Specter of Sunni Military Mobilization in Lebanon Patricio Asfura-Heim • Chris Steinitz with contributions by Ghassan Schbley Cleared for public release DOP-2013-U-006349-Final November 2013 Strategic Studies is a division of CNA. This directorate conducts analyses of security policy, regional analyses, studies of political-military issues, and strategy and force assessments. CNA Strategic Studies is part of the glob- al community of strategic studies institutes and in fact collaborates with many of them. On the ground experience is a hallmark of our regional work. Our specialists combine in-country experience, language skills, and the use of local primary-source data to produce empirically based work. All of our analysts have advanced degrees, and virtually all have lived and worked abroad. Similarly, our strategists and military/naval operations experts have either active duty experience or have served as field analysts with operating Navy and Marine Corps commands. They are skilled at anticipating the “prob- lem after next” as well as determining measures of effectiveness to assess ongoing initiatives. A particular strength is bringing empirical methods to the evaluation of peace-time engagement and shaping activities. The Strategic Studies Division’s charter is global. In particular, our analysts have proven expertise in the follow- ing areas: The full range of Asian security issues The full range of Middle East related security issues, especially Iran and the Arabian Gulf Maritime strategy Insurgency and stabilization Future national security environment and forces European security issues, especially the Mediterranean littoral West Africa, especially the Gulf of Guinea Latin America The world’s most important navies Deterrence, arms control, missile defense and WMD proliferation The Strategic Studies Division is led by Dr.
    [Show full text]