Decentralization in Central Business District of City by Land Use Pattern

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Decentralization in Central Business District of City by Land Use Pattern International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT) ISSN: 2249 – 8958, Volume-7 Issue-4, April 2018 Decentralization in Central Business District of City by Land Use Pattern Alteration to Promote Pedestrian Movement through Urban Design Strategies Case Study: Sabzevar City, Iran Ehsan Amini, Setareh Oruji Abstract: Cities are perhaps one of humanity’s most complex agglomeration economies. In Central Business District Major creations, never finished, never definitive. They are like a journey Characteristics is: that never ends. Their evolution is determined by their ascent into High accessibility • High land cost • High development greatness or their descent into decline. They are the past, the density • High living cost • Presence of tall buildings • Major present and the future. Cities in developing countries like Iran are facing some of the concern are: motor vehicle congestion and commercial activity - Bank headquarters - Financial firms - urban growth. However, the concern in cities like Sabzevar is that Professional services in general. this growth is far more rapid (especially increasing day by day In Central Business District Secondary Characteristics is: motor vehicle). Like many urban processes the spatial nature of • Large public buildings • Town hall and government these problems is self-evident. In order to solve urban mobility buildings • Specialist shops and high end shops • Small problems, this work aims to clarify urban land use changes of the resident population • Office buildings • High pedestrian CBD in a city. Sabzevar city is selected as the study area, because due to excessive focus of attractive land use, functional movement • Maximum parking restrictions in general. differentiation is developed as a result of rapid urban growth. In The urban structure in Sabzevar city is changing very rapidly. this paper, the authors analyse patterns of land use in CBD and This condition happens because of the land use changing examines the relation between these patterns and the movement of from open space to settlements or economic activities. The population. changing of land use can be forced by the scarcity on the land Index Terms: Decentralization, traffic congestion, changing for human activity and the high land value in the city land use pattern, Sabzevar city, pedestrian movement, vehicle especially in CBD. movement. The city boundary has been developed six times from 1921 up to 2001. The Central Business District in the heart of the I. INTRODUCTION city is the oldest part of it and actually is the place where the city originated. The most important developments have taken This paper explores the complex process of mobility place from 1975 onwards where the city almost became and land-use integration in rapidly growing cities in double in size and extended its boundaries to the surrounding developing countries. It first identifies barriers to and villages. opportunities for effective coordination of transit Land use quality is affected by the various strata in the infrastructure and urban development. It then recommends a population differently depending on where they live and set of policies and implementation measures for overcoming people live in different parts of the city depending on their these barriers and exploiting these opportunities. socio-economic status. Due to high land value in the central Well-integrated transit and land development create urban area, the space allocation for earn money with any use is high forms and spaces that reduce the need for travel by private priority resulting in non-coherence amongst different land motorized vehicles especially in central business district area. uses of urban spaces. Areas with good access to public transit and well-designed Central Business District is focal point of a city. It is the urban spaces that are walkable and bike able become highly commercial, office, retail, and cultural centre of the city and attractive places for people to live, work, learn, play, and usually is the centre point for transportation networks. Traffic interact. Such environments enhance a city’s economic congestion is a condition on road networks that occurs as use competitiveness, reduce local pollution and global increases, and is characterized by slower speeds, longer trip greenhouse gas emissions, and promote inclusive times, and increased vehicular queuing. development. These goals are at the heart of transit-oriented Mixed use. A pattern of development characterized by a development (TOD), an urban form that is increasingly mixture of diversified land uses, typically including housing, important to sustainable urban futures. Central business retail activities, and private businesses, either within the same district (CBD). An area where cities’ major businesses building space (for example, vertical mixing) or in close (financial institutions, stores, major convention and sport proximity (for example, horizontal mixing) means mixed use facilities, and hotels) are concentrated. CBDs produce which is necessary in sustainable decentralization. Non-motorized transport is any type of transport mode that is not motorized, such as Revised Manuscript Received on 09 April 2018. walking and bicycling. Ehsan Amini , Research Scholar in Urban and Regional Planning, School of Planning and Architecture, University of Mysore, Mysore, E-mail: [email protected] Setareh Oruji , Lecturer in Azad University, Tehran Published By: Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering Retrieval Number: D5349047418 70 & Sciences Publication Pvt. Ltd. Decentralization in Central Business District of City by Land Use Pattern Alteration to Promote Pedestrian Movement through Urban Design Strategies Case Study: Sabzevar City, Iran Non-motorized transport, or NMT, has gained popularity as not only a clean, carbon-free form of mobility with a very small footprint but also as a means to improve public health through increased physical activity. Pedestrian-friendly design intended to enhance the pedestrian experience, typically through improved amenities (for example, attractive landscaping, lighting, and seating areas) and by improving the efficiency of walking (for example, small city blocks, grid street patterns). Transit-oriented development (TOD). Compact, mixed -use, pedestrian friendly development organized around a transit station. TOD embraces the idea that locating amenities, Figure1: Sectorial Division of the City (CBD - Cyan employment, retail shops, and housing around transit hubs Coloured- Sector no 3) promotes transit usage and non-motorized travel. Highlight a section that you want to designate with a certain Ward number 3 includes 5 neighbourhoods which are style, and then select the appropriate name on the style menu. located in the central part of city. This area is around 1822025 The style will adjust your fonts and line spacing. Do not sq.m which is 182.2 hectares accompanying a variety land change the font sizes or line spacing to squeeze more text uses in this part of the city. Existence of shops along with into a limited number of pages. Use italics for emphasis; do presence of the old market, Jame Mosque, Imam Zadeh not underline. Yahya and offices in the CBD (neighbourhoods 2 & 3), gathers a tremendous amount of daily visitors to the heart of II. BACKGROUND OF STUDY AREA the city for shopping, gathering, visiting, recreation, religious Sabzevar is a city in Northeast Iran, situated in Razavi practices and administrative purposes. Residential land use is Khorasan province with geographical coordinates o f 36° 12' the maximum with 50.22 %, after that networks take about 52" North and 57° 40' 47" East. The City of Sabzevar had a 24.63% and the lowest one is of green spaces with only 1.9 population 232000 in 2011 which rose from 30545 in 1956. percent and minimal industrial use of 1.1 percent. The city is a capital of Sabzevar County, in Razavi Khorasan Table 1: Land Use in All Neighbourhoods of Ward 3 Province of north-eastern part of Iran.It is approximately 220 kilome tres west of Mashhad, the provincial capital and Land use Area (Sq.m) Percentage approximately 651 kilometers east of Tehran, the capital of Residential 53.46 Iran. By considering to Antiquity and historical background 915016 of Sabzevar city, this city, particularly in central parts of city Com Active 133780 17180 7.34 9.42 is having Traditiona l tissue. Due to central business district merc Inactive 38020 0 2.08 located at the oldest part of city, there are a lot of attractive ial places in this part of city. It is cause to many visitors come to health 18285 1 centers CBD from other part of city and the surrounding areas. Educationa 57996 3.18 l III. CITY WARDS Sport 690 0.03 The entire city of Sabzevar has been divided into twelve Administra 23980 1.31 sectors by City Corporation and each sector has its own Publi tive 10193 8.85 sub-sectors called quarters as presented in the Figure. The c Catering 4590 3 0.25 Sector three in the middle is the oldest sector amongst all Cultural 2255 0.12 sectors of the city and also if the fo cal development node. cultural-his 310 0.01 There are numbers of monumental buildings and heritage torical structures registered under protection of the cultural heritage cultural-reli 17960 0.98 organization in this sector addressing the age and history of gious this area. The distinct section of this sector is in the quarters Transportat 22025 1.21 of two and three which are identified to be the centre of ion marketing, business and financial activities as well as dense Urban 8105 0.44 built-up sector where lines of transportation converge from Facilities various parts and nearly from all directions. Therefore, it is Military 5028 0.27 known as the commercial hub of a city which is also called Industrial 34425 1,89 heart of the city as the city life highly depends upon this region. In other words, heart of Sabzevar is a specialized area Park & open space 31875 1.74 and a “distinctive region with a complex web of associated Roads 448750 24.64 and interwoven land uses”.
Recommended publications
  • Central Business District Development in a Transition Economy – Case Studies of Guangzhou and Shenzhen, China
    Central Business District Development in a Transition Economy – Case Studies of Guangzhou and Shenzhen, China Bo B. S. TANG and Stanley Chi-Wai YEUNG Department of Building and Real Estate, Hong Kong Polytechnic University Weiwen Li Shenzhen University, China Acknowledge This paper is based on the research project funded by the Direct RGC Grant to the Hong Kong Polytechnic University of Hong Kong A-P032 Key words: CBD Development, transition economy, China Abstract Since its implementation of economic reforms and open door policy, China has rapidly transformed itself from a socialist planned economy to socialist market economy. Guangzhou and Shanzhen are earmarked as the pioneering and experimental cities within the network of cities in Pearl River Delta Region in implementing various market reform measures. Taking advantage of its close proximity with Hong Kong and Macau, these two cities have achieved remarkable success in economic strength and become modernized commercial cities. Supported by the growth of tertiary industries such as finance. information technology, business and trading, property development in these two cities has also taken a rapid pace. CBD development can also be identifies. CBD development is a relatively new product within the development process of socialist China. Before the marketization reform, China’s socialist planned economy implied that the state was responsible for resource allocation. There was no room for market adjustment. Commercial retail areas replaced the position of CBD as the urban centres. When China adopted its open door policy and introduced market mechanism, the spatial structure of existing cities has begun to change. Business and trading activities outside the state planning process becomes increasingly important.
    [Show full text]
  • Models of Urban Growth : Concentric Zones, Sectors, Multiple Nuclei, Explaitative, Syrn Bolic
    Models of Urban Growth : Concentric Zones, Sectors, Multiple Nuclei, Explaitative, Syrn bolic 6.1 lntroduction 6.2 Structure of Cities 6.3 Concentric Zone Model . 6.4 Sectors Model 6.5 Multiple Nuclei Model 6.6 Exploitative Model 6.7 Symbolic Approach 6.8 Conclusion 6.9 Further Reading Learning Objectives After studying this unit you should be able to: discuss the structure of cities; describe the concentric zone model of studying the structure of cities; explain the sectors model; , describe the multiple nuclei model; discuss the exploitative model; and explain the symbolic approach to the study of city. 6.1 lntroduction Under the rubric of urban ecological process and theories, you have already learnt about the processes of invasion, succession, concentration, centralisation and segregation which characterise different kinds and dimensions of cities. Here in this unit you will learn further about the different aspects of cities and their formations. As you already know, urban society is defined as a relatively larger, dense, permanent, heterogeneous settlements whose majority of inhabitants are engaged in non-agricultural occupation. The development of such urban society is very much determined by socio - cultural organisation, climate, topography and economic development. The earliest cities of the world originated near river valleys such as early civilization of lndus (Mohenjodaro, Harrappa), Tigris - Eupharates (Lagas Ur, Uruk), Nile (Memphis, Thebes) 5 7 and Hwang Ho (Chen-Chan An Yang). These early development of urban settlements evolved with changing technology and human needs. Trade and commercial activities and settled agriculture were major facilitators; even today these,factors are very much relevant in the growth of a city.
    [Show full text]
  • Compare and Contrast the Concentric, Sector and Multiple Nuclei Models
    Name: _________________________ AP Human Geography Cities and Urban Land Use Comparing and Contrasting Urban Models In this activity you will Compare and Contrast the Concentric, Sector and Multiple nuclei models. Implicit assumptions of Burgess, Hoyt, and Harris and Ullman’s models of urban structure in common: A. Their implicit assumptions are: 1) Great variation in characteristics e.g. heterogeneity of the population in culture and society. 2) Competition for centrality because of limited space leading to highest land value. The opposite is true of peripheral areas. 3) City center being center of employment. 4) Commercial and industrial base to the economy of the city. 5) Private ownership of property and capitalist mode of competition for space. 6) Expanding area and population of the city by invasion and succession. 7) No historic survival in any district to influence the land-use pattern. 8) No districts being more attractive because of differences in terrain. 9) Hierarchical order of land use. B. The Concentric, Sector models and multiple nuclei models have many features in common: 1) Both models focus on importance of accessibility. The centrally located C.B.D. is the most accessible and its land value or rent-bid is the highest. 2) Distance decay theory is applicable in both models. Land value and population density decline with distance from the central places. 3) There are clear-cut and abrupt boundaries between the land-use zones. 4) Both concern the study of ground-floor functions instead of the three-dimensional study as height of buildings is neglected 5) Residential segregation Social-economic status segregates residential areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Models of Urban Structure Residential Deterioration and Encroachment by Business and Light Manufacturing
    Models of Urban Structure residential deterioration and encroachment by business and light manufacturing. The zone of independent Cities are not simply random collections of buildings and workers homes (3) was primarily occupied by the blue- people. They exhibit functional structure: they are collar (wage-earners, manual laborers) labor force. The spatially organized to perform their functions as places of zone of better residences (4) consisted mainly of the commerce, production, education, and much more. One middle-class. Finally, the commuters zone (5) was the of the most important forces determining where certain suburban ring, consisting mostly of white-collar workers buildings or activities are located within a city deals with who could afford to live further from the CBD. This the price of land. This tends to be the highest in the model was dynamic. As the city grew, the inner zones downtown area and declines as one moves outward from encroached on the outer ones. the center. The United States is the only country in the world in which the majority of the people live in the Remember, the model was developed for American cities suburbs. Even though house prices may be higher in the and had limited applicability elsewhere. It has been suburbs, the land value is lower (a downtown apartment demonstrated that pre-industrial cities, notably in Europe, complex will produce much more revenue per year than a did not at all followed the concentric circles model. For few suburban homes occupying the same amount of instance, in most pre-industrial European cities, the center space). In every other country the majority resides in was much more important than the periphery, notably in either rural or urban areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Using the Urban Landscape Mosaic to Develop and Validate Methods for Assessing the Spatial Distribution of Urban Ecosystem Service Potential
    USING THE URBAN LANDSCAPE MOSAIC TO DEVELOP AND VALIDATE METHODS FOR ASSESSING THE SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF URBAN ECOSYSTEM SERVICE POTENTIAL Oliver Twanhaw GUNAWAN School of Environment and Life Sciences College of Science and Technology University of Salford, Salford, UK Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, July 2015 Contents Contents ...................................................................................................................... i List of Figures .......................................................................................................... vii List of Tables .......................................................................................................... xiii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................... xvii Abbreviations ....................................................................................................... xviii Abstract .................................................................................................................... xx 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Context of research .......................................................................................... 1 1.2. Ecosystem services in the urban environment .................................................. 2 1.3. Thesis structure ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Theories of Urban Growth
    THEORIES OF URBAN GROWTH • Although several theories have been developed to explain the dynamics of city growth, all such theories are based upon the operation of five ecological processes of concentration, centralization, invasion and succession and observations based upon it about actual city growth in concrete situations. • However, one can hardly find a theory of an ideal pattern of urban dynamics as growth of particular city depends upon many factors, the basic one being natural location of a city .Nevertheless, one can notice a set of common principles which govern city growth everywhere • The major theories of internal structure of urban settlements have been advanced on the basis of empirical investigations conducted in the Western urban society, particularly in North America and Europe. • . Concentric zone model • Ernest Burgess is the pioneer and his theory on city dynamics which provides the base for the later theorists on the subject. The hypothesis of this theory is that cities grow and develop outwardly in concentric zones. Burgess set out to evolve a theory of dynamics but he arrived at a theory of patterns of city growth which applies to any stage stages of urban development. According to Burgess, an urban area consists of five concentric zones which represent areas of functional differentiation and expand rapidly from the Justness centre. The zones are: • (1) The loop or commercial centre • (2) The zone of transition. • (3) The zone of working class residence • (4) The residential zone of high class apartment buildings. • (5) The commuter's zone. 1. The loop or central business district or commercial centre: • 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Models of Urban Growth : Concentric Zones, Sectors, Multiple Nuclei, Explaitative, Syrn Bolic
    Models of Urban Growth : Concentric Zones, Sectors, Multiple Nuclei, Explaitative, Syrn bolic 6.1 lntroduction 6.2 Structure of Cities 6.3 Concentric Zone Model . 6.4 Sectors Model 6.5 Multiple Nuclei Model 6.6 Exploitative Model 6.7 Symbolic Approach 6.8 Conclusion 6.9 Further Reading Learning Objectives After studying this unit you should be able to: discuss the structure of cities; describe the concentric zone model of studying the structure of cities; explain the sectors model; , describe the multiple nuclei model; discuss the exploitative model; and explain the symbolic approach to the study of city. 6.1 lntroduction Under the rubric of urban ecological process and theories, you have already learnt about the processes of invasion, succession, concentration, centralisation and segregation which characterise different kinds and dimensions of cities. Here in this unit you will learn further about the different aspects of cities and their formations. As you already know, urban society is defined as a relatively larger, dense, permanent, heterogeneous settlements whose majority of inhabitants are engaged in non-agricultural occupation. The development of such urban society is very much determined by socio - cultural organisation, climate, topography and economic development. The earliest cities of the world originated near river valleys such as early civilization of lndus (Mohenjodaro, Harrappa), Tigris - Eupharates (Lagas Ur, Uruk), Nile (Memphis, Thebes) 5 7 and Hwang Ho (Chen-Chan An Yang). These early development of urban settlements evolved with changing technology and human needs. Trade and commercial activities and settled agriculture were major facilitators; even today these,factors are very much relevant in the growth of a city.
    [Show full text]
  • The Increasing Sociospatial Fragmentation of Urban America
    Article The Increasing Sociospatial Fragmentation of Urban America Elizabeth C. Delmelle Department of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-704-687-5932 Received: 14 December 2018; Accepted: 7 January 2019; Published: 11 January 2019 Abstract: This analysis examines the spatial fragmentation of the urban landscape with respect to neighborhoods classified according to their racial, demographic, housing and socioeconomic characteristics. The analysis is performed on the 50 largest metropolitan areas throughout the United States from 1990–2010, and looks at both global trends over time using a landscape ecology metric of edge density to quantify fragmentation over time. It then analyzes the spatial clustering of each neighborhood type over time, for each city. Results illustrate an increasingly fragmented urban landscape with respect to neighborhood type, led by Los Angeles as the most fragmented metropolitan area. Decomposed by neighborhood type, both racially concentrated high-poverty neighborhoods, as well as neighborhoods with a highly educated population, have increased in spatial concentration in large cities over time, exposing rises in spatial inequalities even as global patterns suggest a breaking up of neighborhood types. The global patterns are therefore driven by declines in more moderate-income and multiethnic neighborhoods, and a decline in the spatial concentration of newer, white, single-family housing neighborhoods. Keywords: urban form; spatial structure; Chicago school; Los Angeles school; neighborhood typologies 1. Introduction Debates over the urban spatial structure of American cities have largely fallen into two broad, well-documented schools of thought: the neat geometric landscapes of segregated social groups as proposed by Chicago school theorists, and the chaotic, quasi-random, post-modernist landscapes of the Los Angeles school.
    [Show full text]
  • A Generic Classification Scheme for Urban Structure Types
    remote sensing Article A Generic Classification Scheme for Urban Structure Types Arthur Lehner * and Thomas Blaschke Department of Geoinformatics—Z_GIS, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +43-662-8044-7510 Received: 2 December 2018; Accepted: 15 January 2019; Published: 17 January 2019 Abstract: This paper presents a proposal for a generic urban structure type (UST) scheme. Initially developed in the context of urban ecology, the UST approach is increasingly popular in the remote sensing community. However, there is no consistent and standardized UST framework. Until now, the terms land use and certain USTs are often used and described synonymously, or components of structure and use are intermingled. We suggest a generic nomenclature and a respective UST scheme that can be applied worldwide by stakeholders of different disciplines. Based on the insights of a rigorous literature analysis, we formulate a generic structural- and object-based typology, allowing for the generation of hierarchically and terminologically consistent USTs. The developed terminology exclusively focuses on morphology, urban structures and the general exterior appearance of buildings. It builds on the delimitation of spatial objects at several scales and leaves out all social aspects and land use aspects of an urban area. These underlying objects or urban artefacts and their structure- and object-related features, such as texture, patterns, shape, etc. are the core of the hierarchically structured UST scheme. Finally, the authors present a generic framework for the implementation of a remote sensing-based UST classification along with the requirements regarding sensors, data and data types.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Structure and Land Use
    URBAN STRUCTURE AND LAND USE Urban structure is the arrangement of land use in urban areas, in other words, how the land use of a city is set out. Urban planners, economists, and geographers have developed several models that explain where different types of people and businesses tend to exist within the urban setting. Urban structure can also refer to urban spatial structure, which concerns the arrangement of public and private space in cities and the degree of connectivity and accessibility. In essence, there are three model to explain the distribution of social groups within urban areas: . Zonal Model . Sectoral Model . Multiple Nuclei Model ZONAL MODEL: The zonal model also knows as concentric zone model, Burgess model or the CCD model is one of the earliest theoretical models to explain urban social structures. It was created by sociologist Ernest Burgess in 1925. Key (from outside to inside) Commuter zone (outer ring) Residential zone Working class zone Zone of transition Factory zone Central business district (centre) Based on human ecology theory done by Burgess and applied on Chicago, it was the first to give the explanation of distribution of social groups within urban areas. This concentric ring model depicts urban land usage in concentric rings: the Central Business District (or CBD) was in the middle of the model, and the city is expanded in rings with different land uses. It is effectively an urban version of Von Thünen's regional land use model developed a century earlier. It influenced the later development of Homer Hoyt's sector model (1939) and Harris and Ullman's multiple nuclei model (1945).
    [Show full text]
  • Piccadilly Basin Strategic Regeneration Framework
    Piccadilly Basin Strategic Regeneration Framework October 2016 1 Contents Executive Summary 3 1 Introduction 9 2 Economic Context 12 3 Strategic Policy and Regeneration Context 19 4 Piccadilly Basin SRF - Site Analysis 31 5 Development and Urban Design Principles 67 6 Phasing and Delivery Strategy 92 2 Executive Summary Piccadilly Basin SRF Opportunity The Piccadilly Basin SRF represents an opportunity to create a Located in a thriving City Centre. best in class City Centre neighbourhood community with a vibrant mix of office, residential, retail and leisure accommodation offering Adjacent to a major transport hub with exception a place to live, work, relax and play; a place that fosters enterprise transport connections. and innovation; and helps to set Manchester apart from its peer cities. This should be provided as part of: Adjacency to the City’s Northern Quarter. a well-designed environment that is well managed, safe, Adjacency to major areas of investment and growth accessible, sustainable and resilient to climate change, a including Ancoats and New Islington and the wider HS2 place where people will want to live and which fosters long masterplan area. term sustainable communities; A critical mass of land ownership and delivery partners a place with a strong identity supported and enhanced by with a proven track record. new development which reinstates and celebrates Piccadilly Basin’s richly layered history and associated assets based The ability to build upon a diverse mix of established around mills and canal infrastructure; and, uses. an extremely well connected neighbourhood in terms of Waterside frontage and heritage assets that add highly legible, high quality pedestrian and cycle connections character and can form the basis of distinctive place- and complementary uses which provide strong functional making connections.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Are People Distributed Within Urban Areas?
    410 The Cultural Landscape yards and modern schools. And they were pushed from CBDs KEY ISSUE 2 by high rents that business and retail services were willing to pay and by the dirt, crime, congestion, and poverty that they experienced by living downtown. Where Are People In the twenty-first century, however, the population of many U.S. CBDs has increased. New apartment buildings and town- Distributed Within houses have been constructed, and abandoned warehouses and outdated office buildings have been converted into residential Urban Areas? lofts. Downtown living is especially attractive to people with- ■ out school-age children, either “empty nesters” whose children Models of Urban Structure have left home or young professionals who have not yet had ■ Applying the Models Outside children. These two groups are attracted by the entertainment, North America restaurants, museums, and nightlife that are clustered down- town, and they are not worried about the quality of neighbor- People are not distributed randomly within an urban area. hood schools. They concentrate in particular neighborhoods, depending on their social characteristics. Geographers describe where people with particular characteristics are likely to live within an urban area, and they offer explanations for CBDs Outside why these patterns occur. ■ North America CBDs outside the United States are less dominated by commer- cial considerations. The most prominent structures may be Models of Urban Structure churches and former royal palaces, situated on the most impor- Sociologists, economists, and geographers have developed tant public squares, at road junctions, or on hilltops. Parks in three models to help explain where different types of people the center of European cities often were first laid out as private tend to live in an urban area—the concentric zone, sector, and gardens for aristocratic families and later were opened to the multiple nuclei models.
    [Show full text]