A Novel Mutation in DNA Topoisomerase I of Yeast Causes DNA Damage and RAD9-Dependent Cell Cycle Arrest

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Novel Mutation in DNA Topoisomerase I of Yeast Causes DNA Damage and RAD9-Dependent Cell Cycle Arrest Copyright 0 1993 by the Genetics Society of America A Novel Mutation in DNA Topoisomerase I of Yeast Causes DNA Damage and RAD9-Dependent Cell Cycle Arrest Nikki A. Levin,*91Mary-Ann Bjornstit and Gerald R. Fink*" *Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, and Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, and +Department $Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107-5541 Manuscript received October 9, 1992 Accepted for publication December 10, 1992 ABSTRACT DNA topoisomerases, enzymes that alter the superhelicity of DNA, have been implicated in such critical cellular functions as transcription, DNA replication, and recombination. In the yeast Saccha- romyces cerevisiae, a null mutation in the gene encoding topoisomeraseI (TOPl) causes elevated levels of mitotic recombination in the ribosomal DNA (rDNA), but has little effect on growth. We have isolated a missense mutation in TOPl that causes mitotic hyper-recombination notonly in the rDNA, but also at other loci,in addition to causing a number of other unexpectedphenotypes. This topoisomerase I mutation (topl-103) causes slow growth, constitutive expression of DNA damage- inducible genes, and inviability inthe absenceof the double-strand break repair system. Overexpres- sion of topl-103 causes RAD9-dependent cell cycle arrest in GP.We show that the Topl-103 enzyme nicks DNA in vitro, suggesting that it damages DNA directly. We propose that Topl-103 mimics the action of wild-type topoisomerase I in the presence of the anti-tumordrug, camptothecin. YPE I DNA topoisomerases remove superhelical (CHRISTMAN,DIETRICH and FINK 1988). Deletion of T turns from DNA by making a transient single- TOPl in combination with a conditional mutation in stranded break in the DNA backbone and then acting the TOP2 gene, which encodes the yeast type I1 to- as a swivel point about which the strands may rotate poisomerase, results in recombinational excision of [Figure 1; reviewed in CHAMPOUX (1990)l. A major rDNA circles (KIM and WANG 1989).The association role of topoisomerases is believed to be reduction of between topoisomerase mutations and increased re- superhelicity that is generated by such processes as combination levels is also observed for a third yeast transcription and DNA replication (LIU and WANG topoisomerase gene, TOP3, which has been shown to 1987). In fact, a number of studies have implicated elevate mitotic recombination between delta ele- topoisomerases in these important cellular functions ments, which are the terminal repeats of the retro- [reviewed in YANACIDAand STERNCLANZ (1990)l. In transposon Ty (WALLISet al. 1989). the yeast Saccharomyces cereuisiae, topoisomerase mu- In order to explore the role of topoisomerase I in tants have been shown to build up supercoils on highly suppressing recombination, we have isolated new mu- transcribed plasmids (BRILLand STERNCLANZ 1988; tant alleles of the yeast TOPl gene.Among these GIAEVERand WANC1988), andtopoisomerase activity mutants, we identified one allele, designated topl-103, has been shown to be required for DNA replication that has a number of unexpected phenotypes. topl- and transcription (GOTOand WANG 1985). 103 causes an extremely high level of mitotic rDNA The yeast TOPl gene is a member of the highly recombination, giving an rDNA recombination rate conserved group of eukaryotic type I topoisomerases approximately 250-fold higher than wild type and 10- (GOTOand WANG1985; THRASHet al. 1985). Despite fold higher than that found in a topl deletion strain. the evidence for involvement of topoisomerase I in topl-103 also elevates recombination atother loci, essential functions such as transcription and DNA unlike previously studied mutations in TOPl or TOP2. replication, TOPl is notrequired for growth, and The topl-103 mutant grows slowly and expresses deletion of this gene results in only a modest growth DNA damage-induciblegenes constitutively. The defect. Deletion of TOPI does, however, cause a large topl-103 mutantrequires an intact double-strand increase in mitotic recombination in the tandemly break repair system for viability. In addition, overex- repeated ribosomal DNA arrays, a chromosomal do- pression of topl-103 causes cell cycle arrest in GS that main that is normally suppressed for recombination is dependent on the RAD9 gene product, a sensor of DNA damage. In the absence of RAD9, cells overex- ' Present address: Division of Molecular Cytometry, Department of Lab- pressing topl-103 traverse the cell cycle without re- oratory Medicine, MCEi-230, University of California, San Francisco, Cali- fornia94143. pairing DNA damage, resulting in rapid cell death. To whom correspondence should be addressed. We show here that Topl-103 enzyme nicks DNA Genetics 133: 799-814 (April, 1993) 800 N. A. Levin, M.-A. Bjornsti and G. R. Fink A FIGURE 1.-Model of eukaryotic topoisomerase I mechanism. (A) Topoisomerase I binds to super- coiledDNA with high affinity in a noncovalent interaction. The enzyme makes a single-stranded nick in DNA, simultaneously becoming covalently bound to the 3‘ end of the broken DNA strand. This topoisomerase-DNA intermediate is called the “cleavable complex.” The enzyme provides a Cleavable complex swivel about which the broken DNA strand may rotate to relieve superhelical tension. The enzyme then religates the broken DNA strands, releasing B itself from the DNA. After multiple rounds of nicking and resealing, the supercoiled DNA is con- verted to the completely relaxed form. (B) The anti-tumor drug camptothecin (CPT) inhibits the CPT religation step of the reaction, resulting in accu- + mulation of the cleavable complex. (After LW Cleavable complex 1989.) in vitro, suggesting that it can damage DNA directly. personal communication). pGAL::lacZ (pLR1 A23) is a 2-pm We propose that Topl-103mimics the actionof wild- plasmid containing URA3 and GALl-promoted lac2 (WEST, YOCUM and PTASHNE1984). pWE3 is a CEN-ARS plasmid type topoisomeraseI in the presence the anti-tumor of carrying URA3 and GALI-promoted TOPI(ENG et at. 1988). drug, camptothecin. This drugcauses topoisomerase pNKY3Ois an integrative plasmid for creating a I to become trapped during the relaxation reaction as rad5O::URA3 disruption (E. ALANIand N. KLECKNER,per- part of a covalent enzyme-DNA complex [Figure 1; sonal communication).pRR330 is an integrative plasmid for reviewed in Liu (1989,1990)l. The enzyme-bound creating a rad9::URA3 disruption (SCHIESTLet al. 1989). CB17 consists of the 3.8-kb HindIIl fragment of TOPl nicks generated camptothecin result in hyper-re- by filled in with Klenow and cloned into the SmaI site of YEp24 combination, induction of DNA damage responses, (M. F. CHRISTMAN,personal communication). CB32 and and cell cycle arrest, in close parallel to the effects of CB39 are integrative vectors carrying rDNA sequences topi-103. marked by URA3 and HIS3, respectively (CHRISTMAN,DIE- TRICH and FINK1988). CB45 carriesADE2 on a 6-kbBamH1 fragment cloned into the BamHI site of pBR322 and the MATERIALS AND METHODS 6.4-kb HindIII fragment of rDNA cloned into the HindIII site. CB51 and CB52 contain the 3.8-kb HindIIl fragment Media, strains and genetic techniques: Strains are de- of TOPI and of topl-727, respectively,cloned into the scribed Table l. YPD, SD, SC and 5-FOA media are as in HindIII site of YCp405. CB107 is the same as pWE3, but described in GUTHRIEand FINK(1 99 1). “Sectoring plates” with topl-727 replacing TOPl. are SD supplemented with 75 p~ adenine hemisulfate, 75 pNL2 contains the 3.2-kb HindIII-NruI fragment of p~ histidine, 400 p~ tryptophan and 1.7 mM leucine. The levelsof adenine and histidine are lower than those in TOPIcloned into the 7.0-kb HindIII-NruI fragment of standard media in order toachieve darker red coloration of YCp50. pNL2-102, pNL2-103 and pNL2-106 are pNL2 ade2 mutants. Yeast matings, tetrad dissection, lithium ace- containing the mutant alleles topl-102, topl-103 and topl- tate transformation and replica-plating are as in GUTHRIE 106, respectively, in place of TOPI. pNL8 is an integrative and FINK(1 99 1). vector consisting of the 4.3-kb HindIII-ApaI fragment of Plasmids: YCp50is a CEN-ARS vector marked with URA3 pNL2-103 cloned into the 3.5-kb HindIII-ApaI fragment (ROSE et al. 1987). YCp405 is a CEN-ARS vector marked of YIp5.pNL14 is a CEN-ARS plasmid consistingof the 2.6- with LYS2 (MA et al. 1987). YEp24 is a 2-pm vector marked kb MluI-NsiI fragment of topl-I03 from pNL2-103 cloned with URA3 (BOTSTEINet al. 1979). YIp5 is an integrative into the 12.8-kb MluI-NsiI fragment of CB51. pNL30 is a vector carrying URA3 (STRUHLet al. 1979). YIp357r is an CEN-ARS plasmid containing the 2.3-kb Bsu36I fragment integrative vector carrying the URA3, amp’ and lac2 genes of pNL14 cloned into the9.1-kbBsu36I fragment of pWE3 (MYERSet al. 1986). pRS303 and pRS305 are integrative to generate CALI-promoted topl-103. pNL46 is an integra- vectors carrying HIS3 and LEU2, respectively (SIKORSKY tive plasmid marked with LEU2 for fusing the GALl pro- and HIETER1989). moter to alleles of TOPI, consisting of the 2.0-kb EagI- pCT80ATOP is an integrative plasmid used for creating EcoRV fragment of pNL3O cloned into the 5.5-kb EagI- a topl-7::LEU2 disruption (THRASHet al. 1985). pSR 16 and SmaI fragment of pRS305. pNL48 is an integrative plasmid pSR18 are integrative plasmids marked with URA3 for gen- for marking the rDNA with LYS2, consisting of a 2.8-kb erating lac2 fusions to DIN1 and DIN3, respectively (RUBY EcoRI fragment ofrDNA cloned into the EcoRI siteof and SZOSTAK1985). pR12Sclig2 is an ARS plasmid carrying pUC9 carrying LYS2. pNL5 1 is a CEN-ARS plasmid carrying URA3 and CDC9 (BARKER and JOHNSTON 1983). URA3 and topl-103,727 made by cloning the 865-bp Sphl YEpl3(RAD52) is a 2-pmplasmid carrying LEU2 and fragment of CB52 into the 9.3-kb SphI fragment of pNL2- RAD52 (SCHILDet al.
Recommended publications
  • (NAP) and Illustration of DNA Flexure Angles at Single Molecule Resolution Debayan Purkait†A, Debolina Bandyopadhyay†A, and Padmaja P
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.11.293639; this version posted September 11, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Vital Insights into Prokaryotic Genome Compaction by Nucleoid-Associated Protein (NAP) and Illustration of DNA Flexure Angles at Single Molecule Resolution Debayan Purkait†a, Debolina Bandyopadhyay†a, and Padmaja P. Mishra*a aChemical Sciences Division, Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, India aHomi Bhaba National Institute (HBNI), India †Both the authors have contributed equally. * Corresponding author Abstract Integration Host Factor (IHF) is a heterodimeric site-specific nucleoid-associated protein (NAP) well known for its DNA bending ability. The binding is mediated through the narrow minor grooves of the consensus sequence, involving van der-Waals interaction and hydrogen bonding. Although the DNA bend state of IHF has been captured by both X-ray Crystallography and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), the range of flexibility and degree of heterogeneity in terms of quantitative analysis of the nucleoprotein complex has largely remained unexplored. Here we have monitored and compared the trajectories of the conformational dynamics of a dsDNA upon binding of wild-type (wt) and single-chain (sc) IHF at millisecond resolution through single-molecule FRET (smFRET). Our findings reveal that the nucleoprotein complex exists in a ‘Slacked-Dynamic’ state throughout the observation window where many of them have switched between multiple ‘Wobbling States’ in the course of attainment of packaged form. A range of DNA ‘Flexure Angles’ has been calculated that give us vital insights regarding the nucleoid organization and transcriptional regulation in prokaryotes.
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Cycle Regulation by the Bacterial Nucleoid
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Cell cycle regulation by the bacterial nucleoid David William Adams, Ling Juan Wu and Jeff Errington Division site selection presents a fundamental challenge to all terminate in the terminus region (Ter; 1808). Once organisms. Bacterial cells are small and the chromosome chromosome replication and segregation are complete (nucleoid) often fills most of the cell volume. Thus, in order to the cell is ready to divide. In Bacteria this normally occurs maximise fitness and avoid damaging the genetic material, cell by binary fission and in almost all species this is initiated division must be tightly co-ordinated with chromosome by the assembly of the tubulin homologue FtsZ into a replication and segregation. To achieve this, bacteria employ a ring-like structure (‘Z-ring’) at the nascent division site number of different mechanisms to regulate division site (Figure 1) [1]. The Z-ring then functions as a dynamic selection. One such mechanism, termed nucleoid occlusion, platform for assembly of the division machinery [2,3]. Its allows the nucleoid to protect itself by acting as a template for central role in division also allows FtsZ to serve as a nucleoid occlusion factors, which prevent Z-ring assembly over regulatory hub for the majority of regulatory proteins the DNA. These factors are sequence-specific DNA-binding identified to date [2,4]. Nevertheless, the precise ultra- proteins that exploit the precise organisation of the nucleoid, structure of the Z-ring and whether or not it plays a direct allowing them to act as both spatial and temporal regulators of role in force-generation during division remains contro- bacterial cell division.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalytic Domain of Plasmid Pad1 Relaxase Trax Defines a Group Of
    Catalytic domain of plasmid pAD1 relaxase TraX defines a group of relaxases related to restriction endonucleases María Victoria Franciaa,1, Don B. Clewellb,c, Fernando de la Cruzd, and Gabriel Moncaliánd aServicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla e Instituto de Formación e Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander 39008, Spain; bDepartment of Biologic and Materials Sciences, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; cDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; and dDepartamento de Biología Molecular e Instituto de Biomedicina y Biotecnología de Cantabria, Universidad de Cantabria–Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas–Sociedad para el Desarrollo Regional de Cantabria, Santander 39011, Spain Edited by Roy Curtiss III, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, and approved July 9, 2013 (received for review May 30, 2013) Plasmid pAD1 is a 60-kb conjugative element commonly found in known relaxases show two characteristic sequence motifs, motif I clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecalis. The relaxase TraX and the containing the catalytic Tyr residue (which covalently attaches to primary origin of transfer oriT2 are located close to each other and the 5′ end of the cleaved DNA) and motif III with the His-triad have been shown to be essential for conjugation. The oriT2 site essential for relaxase activity (facilitating the cleavage reaction contains a large inverted repeat (where the nic site is located) by activation of the catalytic Tyr). This His-triad has been used as adjacent to a series of short direct repeats. TraX does not show a relaxase diagnostic signature (12). fi any of the typical relaxase sequence motifs but is the prototype of Plasmid pAD1 relaxase, TraX, was identi ed (9) and shown to oriT2 a unique family of relaxases (MOB ).
    [Show full text]
  • Relaxation Complexes of Plasmids Colel and Cole2:Unique Site of The
    Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 71, No. 10, pp. 3854-3857, October 1974 Relaxation Complexes of Plasmids ColEl and ColE2: Unique Site of the Nick in the Open Circular DNA of the Relaxed Complexes (Escherichia coli/supercoiled DNA/endonuclease/restriction enzyme/DNA replication) MICHAEL A. LOVETT, DONALD G. GUINEY, AND DONALD R. HELINSKI Department of Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif. 92037 Communicated by Stanley L. Miller, June 26, 1974 ABSTRACT The product of the induced relaxation of volved in the production of a single-strand cleavage in the supercoiled DNA-protein relaxation complexes of colicino- initiation of replication and/or conjugal transfer of plasmid genic factors El (ColEl) and E2 (CoIE2) is an open circular DNA molecule with a strand-specific nick. Cleavage of the DNA. An involvement in such processes would most likely open circular DNA of each relaxed complex with the EcoRI require that the relaxation event take place at a unique site restriction endonuclease demonstrates that the single- in the DNA molecule. In this report, evidence will be pre- strand break is at a unique position. The site of the single- sented from studies using the EcoRI restriction endonuclease strand break in the relaxed ColEl complex is approximately the same distance from the EcoRI cleavage site as the that the strand-specific relaxation event takes place at a origin of ColEl DNA replication. unique site on both the ColEl and CoIE2 plasmid molecules. The location of this site, at least in the case of the ColEl Many of extrachromosomal circular DNA elements (plas- plasmid, is approximately the same distance from the single mids) of Escherichia coli, differing in molecular weight, num- EcoRI site as the origin of replication for this plasmid.
    [Show full text]
  • S Na P S H O T: D N a Mism a Tc H R E P a Ir
    SnapShot: Repair DNA Mismatch Scott A. Lujan, and Thomas Kunkel A. Larrea, Andres Park, NC 27709, USA Triangle Health Sciences, NIH, DHHS, Research National Institutes of Environmental 730 Cell 141, May 14, 2010 ©2010 Elsevier Inc. DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.002 See online version for legend and references. SnapShot: DNA Mismatch Repair Andres A. Larrea, Scott A. Lujan, and Thomas A. Kunkel National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, DHHS, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA Mismatch Repair in Bacteria and Eukaryotes Mismatch repair in the bacterium Escherichia coli is initiated when a homodimer of MutS binds as an asymmetric clamp to DNA containing a variety of base-base and insertion-deletion mismatches. The MutL homodimer then couples MutS recognition to the signal that distinguishes between the template and nascent DNA strands. In E. coli, the lack of adenine methylation, catalyzed by the DNA adenine methyltransferase (Dam) in newly synthesized GATC sequences, allows E. coli MutH to cleave the nascent strand. The resulting nick is used for mismatch removal involving the UvrD helicase, single-strand DNA-binding protein (SSB), and excision by single-stranded DNA exonucleases from either direction, depending upon the polarity of the nick relative to the mismatch. DNA polymerase III correctly resynthesizes DNA and ligase completes repair. In bacteria lacking Dam/MutH, as in eukaryotes, the signal for strand discrimination is uncertain but may be the DNA ends associated with replication forks. In these bacteria, MutL harbors a nick-dependent endonuclease that creates a nick that can be used for mismatch excision. Eukaryotic mismatch repair is similar, although it involves several dif- ferent MutS and MutL homologs: MutSα (MSH2/MSH6) recognizes single base-base mismatches and 1–2 base insertion/deletions; MutSβ (MSH2/MSH3) recognizes insertion/ deletion mismatches containing two or more extra bases.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Abasic Sites and DNA Single-Strand Breaks on Prokaryotic RNA Polymerases (Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Sites/Transcription/DNA Damage) WEI ZHOU* and PAUL W
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 90, pp. 6601-6605, July 1993 Biochemistry Effects of abasic sites and DNA single-strand breaks on prokaryotic RNA polymerases (apurinic/apyrimidinic sites/transcription/DNA damage) WEI ZHOU* AND PAUL W. DOETSCH*tt Departments of *Biochemistry and tRadiation Oncology and tDivision of Cancer Biology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322 Communicated by Philip C. Hanawalt, April 19, 1993 ABSTRACT Abasic sites are thought to be the most fre- effects of such damage on both transcription initiation and quently occurring cellular DNA damage and are generated elongation processes (19, 20). We wished to determine the spontaneously or as the result of chemical or radiation damage effects of AP sites on the transcription elongation process by to DNA. In contrast to the wealth of information that exists on using a defined system that would provide direct information the effects of abasic sites on DNA polymerases, very little is regarding the ability of RNA polymerases to bypass or be known about how these lesions interact with RNA polymerases. blocked by AP sites and, if bypass was observed, to deter- An in vitro transcription system was used to determine the mine the nature of the base insertion opposite such lesions. effects of abasic sites and single-strand breaks on transcrip- For these studies, we constructed a DNA template containing tional elongation. DNA templates were constructed containing a single AP site placed at a unique location downstream from single abasic sites or nicks placed at unique locations down- either the SP6 or tac promoter and carried out in vitro stream from two different promoters and were transcribed by transcription experiments with SP6 and E.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Structure at the Plasmid Origin-Of-Transfer Indicates Its
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN DNA structure at the plasmid origin-of-transfer indicates its potential transfer range Received: 12 May 2016 Jan Zrimec1,2,3 & Aleš Lapanje1,4,5 Accepted: 10 January 2018 Horizontal gene transfer via plasmid conjugation enables antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to spread Published: xx xx xxxx among bacteria and is a major health concern. The range of potential transfer hosts of a particular conjugative plasmid is characterised by its mobility (MOB) group, which is currently determined based on the amino acid sequence of the plasmid-encoded relaxase. To facilitate prediction of plasmid MOB groups, we have developed a bioinformatic procedure based on analysis of the origin-of-transfer (oriT), a merely 230 bp long non-coding plasmid DNA region that is the enzymatic substrate for the relaxase. By computationally interpreting conformational and physicochemical properties of the oriT region, which facilitate relaxase-oriT recognition and initiation of nicking, MOB groups can be resolved with over 99% accuracy. We have shown that oriT structural properties are highly conserved and can be used to discriminate among MOB groups more efciently than the oriT nucleotide sequence. The procedure for prediction of MOB groups and potential transfer range of plasmids was implemented using published data and is available at http://dnatools.eu/MOB/plasmid.html. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a pressing global issue, as it diminishes the activity of 29 antibiotics and conse- quently leads to over 25,000 deaths each year in Europe alone1,2. Te development of AMR in microbial commu- nities is facilitated by horizontal gene transfer (HGT) of conjugative elements (including plasmids and integrative elements)3 carrying antibiotic resistance genes along with virulence genes4,5.
    [Show full text]
  • Enzymatic Completion of Mammalian Lagging-Strand DNA Replication JOHN J
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 91, pp. 9803-9807, October 1994 Biochemistry Enzymatic completion of mammalian lagging-strand DNA replication JOHN J. TuRCHI*, LIN HUANGt, RICHARD S. MURANTEt, YONG KIMt, AND ROBERT A. BAMBARAtt *Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435; and tDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642 Communicated by Fred Sherman, June 8, 1994 (receivedfor review April 28, 1994) ABSTRACT Using purified proteins from calf and a syn- in DNA replication and transcription (21), but no specific thetic substrate, we have reconstituted the enzymatic reactions roles have been established for either class. required for mammalian Okazaki fragment processing in vitro. We had shown (22) that the calf 5'-to-3' exonuclease could The required reactions are removal of initiator RNA, synthesis work with calf DNA polymerases a, 8, or e and DNA ligase fromanupstre fragment to generate a nick, and thenligation. I to join two DNA primers annealed to a template with a With our substrate, RNase H type I (RNase HI) makes a single four-base gap. In addition, we have demonstrated that 5'- cut in the initiator RNA, one nucleotide 5' of the RNA-DNA to-3' exonuclease activity is stimulated by synthesis from an junction. The double strandspecific 5' to3' exonuclease removes upstream primer and that the stimulation is the result of the the remaining monoribonuceotide. After dissociation ofcleaved formation of a nick between the two primers, which is a RNA, synthesis by DNA polymerase generates a nick, which is preferred substrate for the exonuclease (17). These results then sealed by DNA igase I.
    [Show full text]
  • Can a Nick Promote Partial Genome Re-Replication?
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.14.381277; this version posted November 15, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. Can a nick promote partial genome re-replication? Erik Johansson1,2,* and John F.X Diffley1,* 1 Chromosome Replication Laboratory The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London, NW1 1AT 2 Dept. of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden *Corresponding Authors [email protected] Tel: +46 (0) 90 786 6638 [email protected] Tel: +44 (0) 203 796 1833 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.14.381277; this version posted November 15, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. Abstract Single-stranded DNA breaks, including simple nicks, are amongst the most common forms of DNA damage in cells. They can be readily repaired by ligation; however, if a nick occurs just ahead of an approaching replisome, the outcome is a ‘collapsed’ replication fork in which the nick is converted into a single-ended double-strand DNA break. Attention has largely focused on the processes by which this broken end is used to prime replication restart.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Observation of Topoisomerase IA Gate Dynamics Maria Mills1, Yuk-Ching Tse-Dinh2,3, & Keir C
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/356659; this version posted June 27, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. This article is a US Government work. It is not subject to copyright under 17 USC 105 and is also made available for use under a CC0 license. Direct Observation of Topoisomerase IA Gate Dynamics Maria Mills1, Yuk-Ching Tse-Dinh2,3, & Keir C. Neuman1* 1 Laboratory of Single Molecule Biophysics, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA 2 Biomolecular Sciences Institute, Florida International University, Miami, Florida 33199, USA 3 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Florida International University, Miami, Florida 33199, USA * Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/356659; this version posted June 27, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. This article is a US Government work. It is not subject to copyright under 17 USC 105 and is also made available for use under a CC0 license. Abstract Type IA topoisomerases cleave single-stranded DNA and relieve negative supercoils in discrete steps corresponding to the passage of the intact DNA strand through the cleaved strand. Although it is assumed type IA topoisomerases accomplish this strand passage via a protein-mediated DNA gate, opening of this gate has never been observed. We developed a single-molecule assay to directly measure gate opening of the E. coli type IA topoisomerases I and III.
    [Show full text]
  • The Devil Is in the Details for DNA Mismatch Repair COMMENTARY
    COMMENTARY The Devil is in the details for DNA mismatch repair COMMENTARY Peggy Hsieha,1 and Yongliang Zhanga Ensuring high-fidelity DNA replication is essential a strand-specific signal for excision can be far apart) (7–9). for maintaining genome stability in organisms from MMR in eukaryotes features two families of MMR pro- Escherichia coli to humans. This task requires an intricate teins, heterodimeric homologs of bacterial MutS (MSH) network of cellular components that carries out replica- or MutL (MLH). Early models of E. coli MMR invoke tion and postreplication DNA repair (1). In eukaryotes, MMR protein-mediated DNA looping between a mis- replication is carried out by Pol e and Pol δ that synthesize match and a DNA-methylation excision signal or ATP- the leading and lagging strands, respectively, using short driven MutS translocation along the DNA. The nucleotide RNA–DNA primers synthesized by Pol α. Although repli- switch model posits the existence of multiple diffusing cation gives rise to a low spontaneous mutation rate of MSH–MLH clamps (8). Other studies suggest that a single − ∼10 10 mutations per base pair per generation, errors in MSH clamp at a mismatch can load multiple MLH clamps the nucleotide incorporation step occur about once every to license excision (1, 9). MutSα (MSH2-MSH6) and MutSβ + 104 to 105 insertions on average, although the frequency (MSH2-MSH3) are related to the AAA family of ATPases varies considerably depending on a number of parame- and carry out mismatch recognition (10, 11). MutL homo- ters including the particular mismatch, chromosomal con- logs MutLα (yeast ScMlh1-Pms1 and human HsMLH1- text, and the DNA polymerase.
    [Show full text]
  • Nickseq for Genome-Wide Strand-Specific Identification of DNA Single- Strand Break Sites with Single Nucleotide Resolution
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/867937; this version posted December 10, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. NickSeq for genome-wide strand-specific identification of DNA single- strand break sites with single nucleotide resolution Joshua J. Elacqua1,2,*, Navpreet Ranu1,2,4,*, Sarah E. DiIorio1,2,5 and Paul C. Blainey1,2,3,+ ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs), or ‘nicks’, are Cells continuously accrue DNA damage due to the most common form of DNA damage. Nicks exposure to environmental stressors. The single- occur at rates of tens of thousands per cell per strand break (SSB), or ‘nick’, is estimated to day, and result from many sources including occur at rates of tens of thousands per cell per oxidative stress and endogenous enzyme day, making it the most frequent type of damage.1 activities. Accumulation of nicks, due to high rates Reactive oxygen species such as hydrogen of occurrence or defects in repair enzymes, has peroxide-derived free radicals can nick DNA been implicated in multiple diseases. However, either directly by reacting with its sugar- improved methods for nick analysis are needed phosphate backbone or indirectly by altering to learn how their locations and number affect nucleobases which are then subject to repair cells, disease progression, and health outcomes. pathways entailing nicked intermediates.1,2 In addition to natural processes including DNA Endogenous processes including DNA repair, leading genome-editing technologies rely replication and topoisomerase activity also on nuclease activity, including nick generation, at generate nicks.1,3 target sites.
    [Show full text]