DOCSLIB.ORG

Upgrading of Dodoma-Babati Road (260 Km) to Bitumen Standard

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Upgrading of Dodoma-Babati Road (260 Km) to Bitumen Standard The United Republic of Tanzania Ministry of Works Tanzania National Roads Agency (TANROADS) Zain House, P. O. Box 11364, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Tel: +255 22 2152576; Fax: +255 22 2150022; E-mail: [email protected] RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN FOR UPGRADING OF DODOMA – BABATI ROAD (260 Km) TO BITUMEN STANDARD. Mayamaya-Mela (99.35km) and Mela-Bonga (88.8km) Project Location: Dodoma and Manyara Regions Submitted to: Tanzania National Roads Agency (TANROADS) Third Floor, Zain House P. O. Box 11364, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Original Report by Carl Bro a/s M-K Revised by CTC October 2011 RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN REPORT FOR THE UPGRADING OF DODOMA- BABATI ROAD (260KM) TO BITUMEN STANDARD MAYAMAYA-MELA (99.35KM) AND MELA-BONGA (88.8KM) TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................ - 2 - LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................................................... - 6 - DEFINITION OF TERMS ......................................................................................................................................... - 8 - ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .......................................................................................................................................... - 9 - 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. - 10 - 1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE PROJECT ................................................................................................................................ - 10 - 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION .............................................................................................................................................. - 10 - 1.3 JUSTIFICATION OF THE PROJECT ................................................................................................................................ - 11 - 1.4 PROJECT DESIGN AND APPROACH ............................................................................................................................. - 12 - 1.5 PROJECT OBJECTIVES............................................................................................................................................. - 12 - 1.6 GENERAL OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................. - 12 - 1.7 DISCLOSURE OF THE RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN ....................................................................................................... - 13 - 1.8 PRINCIPLES GOVERNING THE RAP ............................................................................................................................ - 13 - 1.9 DEFINING PROJECT AFFECTED PERSON (PAP) ............................................................................................................ - 13 - 1.10 CUT-OFF DATES ................................................................................................................................................. - 14 - 1.11 MINIMIZATION OF IMPACTS .................................................................................................................................. - 14 - 2. APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................... - 15 - 2.1 STUDY APPROACH ................................................................................................................................................ - 15 - 2.2 INFORMATION SOURCES ........................................................................................................................................ - 15 - 2.3 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................................... - 15 - 2.3.1 Site Visits ................................................................................................................................................. - 15 - 2.3.2 Literature Review ..................................................................................................................................... - 16 - 2.3.3 Consultation ............................................................................................................................................ - 16 - 2.3.4 Interviews ............................................................................................................................................... - 16 - 2.3.5 Focus Group Discussions ......................................................................................................................... - 17 - 2.3.6 Community Meetings.............................................................................................................................. - 17 - 2.3.7 Zoning of Affected Area ........................................................................................................................... - 18 - 2.3.8 Socio-Economic Survey ........................................................................................................................... - 18 - 2.3.9 Census and Asset Inventory .................................................................................................................... - 19 - 2.3.10 Asset Valuation ..................................................................................................................................... - 20 - 2.4 DATA ANALYSIS AND REPORTING .............................................................................................................................. - 21 - 2.5 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY .................................................................................................................................... - 21 - 3. POTENTIAL IMPACTS ...................................................................................................................................... - 22 - 3.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... - 22 - 3.2 EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES ............................................................................................................................... - 22 - 3.3 IDENTIFICATION OF NEGATIVE POTENTIAL IMPACTS ..................................................................................................... - 22 - 3.3.1. Affected Households ............................................................................................................................... - 23 - 3.3.2 Loss of access to social services ............................................................................................................... - 27 - 3.4 SOCIAL IMPACTS OF RELOCATION ............................................................................................................................ - 27 - 3.4.1 Loss of structures including shelter ......................................................................................................... - 30 - SOURCE: SOCIO ECONOMIC PROFILE OF AFFECTED PEOPLE 2011 .......................................................................................... - 30 - 3.4.2 Crop Production ....................................................................................................................................... - 30 - 3.4.3 Loss of their productive assets (Trees and Crops) .................................................................................... - 31 - 3.4.4 Impacted Graveyards............................................................................................................................... - 32 - 3.4.5 Identified Vulnerable ............................................................................................................................... - 33 - 4. ORGANISATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY ................................................................................................................ - 35 - 4.1 ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES ........................................................................ - 35 - 4.2 REGIONAL AND DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................................................... - 35 - 4.3 MINISTRY OF LANDS AND HUMAN SETTLEMENT ......................................................................................................... - 35 - 4.4 MINISTRY OF WORKS ............................................................................................................................................ - 35 - 4.5 TANROADS ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE AND RESPONSIBILITY ................................................................................. - 36 - 4.6 INTER-AGENCY COORDINATION ............................................................................................................................... - 37 - 4.7 IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ............................................................................................................................... - 37 - 4.8 RESETTLEMENT MEASURES .................................................................................................................................... - 37 - 4.8.1 Compensation ........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 Tanzania in Figures
    2019 Tanzania in Figures The United Republic of Tanzania 2019 TANZANIA IN FIGURES National Bureau of Statistics Dodoma June 2020 H. E. Dr. John Pombe Joseph Magufuli President of the United Republic of Tanzania “Statistics are very vital in the development of any country particularly when they are of good quality since they enable government to understand the needs of its people, set goals and formulate development programmes and monitor their implementation” H.E. Dr. John Pombe Joseph Magufuli the President of the United Republic of Tanzania at the foundation stone-laying ceremony for the new NBS offices in Dodoma December, 2017. What is the importance of statistics in your daily life? “Statistical information is very important as it helps a person to do things in an organizational way with greater precision unlike when one does not have. In my business, for example, statistics help me know where I can get raw materials, get to know the number of my customers and help me prepare products accordingly. Indeed, the numbers show the trend of my business which allows me to predict the future. My customers are both locals and foreigners who yearly visit the region. In June every year, I gather information from various institutions which receive foreign visitors here in Dodoma. With estimated number of visitors in hand, it gives me ample time to prepare products for my clients’ satisfaction. In terms of my daily life, Statistics help me in understanding my daily household needs hence make proper expenditures.” Mr. Kulwa James Zimba, Artist, Sixth street Dodoma.”. What is the importance of statistics in your daily life? “Statistical Data is useful for development at family as well as national level because without statistics one cannot plan and implement development plans properly.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenging the Win-Win Proposition of Community-Based Wildlife Management in Tanzania
    THE PIMA PROJECT RESEARCH DISSEMINATION NOTE Poverty ad ecosyste service ipacts of Tazaia’s Wildlife Maageet Areas BURUNGE WMA Map of Burunge WMA Burunge was registered in 2006 and received user rights in Manyara 2007. Its nine1 member villages are: Kakoi, Olasiti, Magara, Lake Manyara Ranch National Park Maweni, Manyara, Sangaiwe, Mwada, Ngolei, Vilima Vitatu. They are home to ca. 34,000 people of the Mbugwe, Barbaig, Iraqw, Maasai and Warusha ethnicities have set Burunge aside 280 km2 for wildlife conservation purposes, WMA facilitated by African Wildlife Foundation and Babati District. Located between Tarangire National Park, Tarangire Manyara Ranch and Lake Manyara National Park in Babati National Park district, Manyara region, the WMA features a large tourism potential. Currently the WMA has agreements with four tourism investors operating across 6 lodge sites and one hunting block. The PIMA project dissemination note Fig. 1: Map of Burunge WMA (white). Village borders (black) are The Poverty and ecosystem service I estimates, based on georeferenced village maps, fieldwork, GIS shapefiles from NBS, WWF, TANAPA. Compiled by J. Bluwstein. Wildlife Management Areas (PIMA) project is an international research collaboration mpactsinvolving of UniversityTanzanias College London, the University of Copenhagen, Imperial Fact box: Burunge WMA College London, Edinburgh University, the Tanzania Region Manyara Member villages 9 Wildlife Research Institute, the UNEP World Conservation Population (PHC 2012) 34,000 Monitoring Centre, and the Tanzania Natural Resources Area 280 km2 Forum. PIMA collected household-level information on Year registered 2006 wealth and livelihoods through surveys and wealth ranking Authorised Association (AA) Juhibu exercises, supplemented with WMA- and village-level WMA Income 2014/2015 (USD) 381,835 information on WMA governance, including revenue distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissemination Meeting Held in Arusha, Tanzania (10 December 2019)
    REPORT OF THE WILLOWS IMPACT EVALUATION (WIE) DISSEMINATION MEETING HELD IN ARUSHA, TANZANIA (10 DECEMBER 2019) PI: Prof. Sia Msuya Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center P.O. Box 3010 Moshi, Tanzania Tel: +255- 2754379 E-mail: [email protected] 1 Table of contents 1.0. Background .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.0. Meeting Participants ................................................................................................................ 3 3.0. Meeting Presentations .............................................................................................................. 4 4.0. Discussion and Meeting Recommendations ............................................................................ 6 5.0. Closing Remarks ...................................................................................................................... 9 6.0. Conclusions ............................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 7.0. Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... 12 8.0. Appendices .............................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 2 1.0. Background The Willows Impact Evaluation project (hereafter WIE is a collaborative evaluation programme between (Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College (hereafter KCMUCo) and the Harvard T.H Chan School
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile
    The United Republic of Tanzania Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile National Bureau of Statistics Ministry of Finance Dar es Salaam and Office of Chief Government Statistician Ministry of State, President ‟s Office, State House and Good Governance Zanzibar April, 2014 UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA, ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARIES Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile Foreword The 2012 Population and Housing Census (PHC) for the United Republic of Tanzania was carried out on the 26th August, 2012. This was the fifth Census after the Union of Tanganyika and Zanzibar in 1964. Other censuses were carried out in 1967, 1978, 1988 and 2002. The 2012 PHC, like previous censuses, will contribute to the improvement of quality of life of Tanzanians through the provision of current and reliable data for policy formulation, development planning and service delivery as well as for monitoring and evaluating national and international development frameworks. The 2012 PHC is unique as the collected information will be used in monitoring and evaluating the Development Vision 2025 for Tanzania Mainland and Zanzibar Development Vision 2020, Five Year Development Plan 2011/12–2015/16, National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (NSGRP) commonly known as MKUKUTA and Zanzibar Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (ZSGRP) commonly known as MKUZA. The Census will also provide information for the evaluation of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in 2015. The Poverty Monitoring Master Plan, which is the monitoring tool for NSGRP and ZSGRP, mapped out core indicators for poverty monitoring against the sequence of surveys, with the 2012 PHC being one of them. Several of these core indicators for poverty monitoring are measured directly from the 2012 PHC.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Impacts of Climate Change and Variability on Maize Post-Harvest System at Kongwa and Kondoa District in Tanzania
    Vol. 12(1), pp. 7-18, January-June 2020 DOI: 10.5897/JABSD2019.0360 Article Number: B80A0C563237 ISSN: 2141-2340 Copyright ©2020 Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology and Author(s) retain the copyright of this article http://www.academicjournals.org/JABSD Sustainable Development Full Length Research Assessing the impacts of climate change and variability on maize post-harvest system at Kongwa and Kondoa District in Tanzania Namkunda Johnson1, Agnes Nyomora2 and James Lyimo3* 1Centre for Climate Change Studies, University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 2Department of Botany, College of Natural Resources and Applied Sciences, University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 3Institute of Resource Assessment, University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Received 11 October, 2019; Accepted 24 February, 2020 This study attempted to investigate the pattern and trend of climate change, its influence and interaction with maize post-harvest system and established the current status of maize post-harvest losses at Kongwa and Kondoa district in Tanzania. Participatory rural appraisal technique and household survey methods were used to collect primary data. Secondary data for the study area including rainfall and temperature data from the year 1982 -2017 were collected from Tanzania Meteorological Agency. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically using Nvivo software. Quantitative data from household survey were cross tabulated using SPSS software version 20 and the results were confirmed using canonical correlation test while pattern and trend of rainfall and temperature data were analyzed using trend lines and was confirmed using Mann-Kendall trend test. Findings indicated that annual temperature increase and monthly rainfall pattern changes influences maize post-harvest losses with significant losses denoted more during harvesting and storage with a positive correlation of R2= 0.014 and R2 = 0.121 respectively, while statuses for the maize post-harvest losses are below the threshold value of 40%.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Final Report Baseline Study for Hand in Hand Eastern Africa Program in Northern Tanzania August 2017 Table of Contents Table of Contents.................................................................................................................. 2 List of tables.......................................................................................................................... 3 List of figures ........................................................................................................................ 4 List of Abbreviations.............................................................................................................. 5 Acknowledgement................................................................................................................. 6 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 7 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................. 13 1.1 Overview of HiH EA Model.................................................................................... 13 1.2 HiH EA Expansion Plan for Tanzania.................................................................... 14 2. The Baseline Study...................................................................................................... 15 2.1 The Scoping Study................................................................................................ 15 2.1.1 Objectives of the Scoping
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    IK: Other Ways of Knowing Peer Reviewed Challenges in Harnessing Indigenous Knowledge Systems through Creation of Employment for Rural Women in Tanzania: The Case Study of Barabaig Volume: 4 Pg 68-94 Leather Products in Manyara Region John M. Mtui, PhD Lecturer, University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania This study examines opportunities and challenges in harnessing indigenous knowledge (IK) for employment creation and poverty reduction in rural Tanzania. The study is underpinned by literature review and descriptive analysis focusing on leather products made by Barabaig women in Hanang, Tanzania. During the study, a sample of one hundred households was selected and interviewed. Data were collected from the administered interviews that were structured like a questionnaire. The literature details the challenges IK faces, including: the threat of extinction due to lack of recording, with much focus on IK that has a direct cash benefit only and the ignored “non-cash” knowledge; considered as part of a residual, traditional, and backward way of life that is easily brushed off on the ground that it cannot be trusted; and not inclusive. The IK drive in Tanzania lacks one unifying policy. Inadequate tanning training, expensive modern tanning inputs, low quality hides and skins associated with poor animal husbandry, poor quality local inputs and tools, low quality output, and lack of markets are among the inhibiting factors faced by Barabaig women using IK to create leather products. Poor roads, inadequate supply of clean water and health services, and lack of electricity is another set of hurdles Barabaig women face. Apart from leather products, Barabaig women also produce other traditional products such as blankets, shawls, bracelets, and neck and waist ornaments.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. KONDOA DISTRICT COUNCIL No Name of the Project Opportunities
    1. KONDOA DISTRICT COUNCIL No Name of Opportunities Geographic Location Land Ownership Ongoing activities Competitive advantage the Project for investors 1. BUKULU Establishment Bukulu Industrial Area is Bukulu Industrial plot There is currently no Bukulu Industrial Area will serve Industrial of Located at Soera ward in area is owned by Kondoa established structure the growing demand for areas Area Manufacturing Kondoa District, Dodoma District Council at Bukulu Industrial to invest in manufacturing Industries Region Future ownership of the Area plot (green The plot is designated for The size of Bukulu land will be discussed field). No demolition manufacturing and located Industrial Area is 400 between the Developer work is needed by about 220km from the Acres and the owner Investor proposed dry port of Ihumwa Bukulu Industrial Area is Investors will be Manufacturing is aligned with located 47km from required to remove Government Five Year Kondoa Town and 197km some shrubs and Development Plan – II (FYDP – from Dodoma Town. conduct other site II) which promotes The Plot is located just off clearance activities industrialisation the main highway from The prospective Industrial Area Dodoma to Arusha is set to enjoy all the necessary The Area is closer to all infrastructures since it is just the necessary 197km from Government infrastructures Capital – Dodoma (electricity, water and The plot is located along the communications) Dodoma – Arusha highway Bukulu area is designated which is the longest and busiest for manufacturing Trans – African transportation Industries corridor linking Cape Town (South Africa) and Cairo (Egypt) 2. PAHI Establishment Pahi Industrial Area is Pahi Industrial plot area There is currently no Pahi Industrial Area will serve Industrial of Located at Pahi ward in is owned by Kondoa established structure the growing demand for areas Area Manufacturing Kondoa District, Dodoma District Council at Pahi Industrial Area to invest in manufacturing Region plot (green field).
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Manyara Watershed Assessment
    USFS - Greg Bevenger Photo/ Lake Manyara Watershed Assessment Progress Report December 2003 Lake Manyara Watershed Assessment: Progress Report—December 2003 1 I. LAKE MANYARA WATERSHED ASSESSMENT Overview African Wildlife Foundation (AWF) has initiated a detailed assessment of the Lake Manyara watershed, which is one of two catchment basins that sustain the Tarangire-Manyara ecosystem, in northern Tanzania. Through a partnership with the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), AWF is working to protect forest, soil and water resources in important African landscapes, through its African Heartland program. To address concerns of habitat fragmentation and environmental degradation within the Lake Manyara watershed AWF has partnered with local stakeholders and the USFS to conduct an assessment of the watershed. AWF is leading the assessment, which includes development of a GIS and associated database, and compilation of relevant information related to the Lake Manyara watershed. USFS is providing technical assistance in watershed science, as well as financial support. AWF is building upon the considerable work that has already been undertaken by partners in the region1, in order to improve the conservation of natural resources in this important landscape. AWF and USFS are conducting this assessment through a process that aims to characterize ecosystem elements from a watershed perspective, identify key issues and problems in the watershed, and ultimately provide management recommendations. Masai Steppe Heartland The assessment is being implemented through AWF’s African Heartland program, which is a collaborative, landscape-level management approach to conserving Africa’s unique wildlife resources. Heartlands are large areas of exceptional natural value where AWF works with a variety of partners, including local people, governments and other resource users to ensure these landscapes are prioritized for conservation and are kept ecologically and economically viable.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges Facing Food Processing Mses in Tanzania
    Challenges Facing Food Processing MSEs in Tanzania A Qualitative Case Study of the Sunflower Oil Industry in Babati, Manyara Author: Mikaela Ekblom Supervisor: Vesa-Matti Loiske Södertörn University | School of Science, Technology and Environmental Studies Bachelor's thesis, 15 ECTS Environment and Development | Spring 2016 1 Abstract Food processing micro- and small-scale enterprises (MSEs) play an important role in the national economic development of Tanzania. Though many of them have great growth potential, they face a number of constraints hindering further development, and large amounts of cooking oil are imported each year. The aim of thesis has therefore been to identify and analyse the different factors affecting these MSEs in order to find out which the major growth challenges are. The case study is mainly based on individual semi-structured interviews with sunflower oil processors and farmers in Babati districts, conducted in February and March 2016, and earlier research and studies on the topic of MSE growth make up the theoretical framework used for analysis of the data. The findings show that there are indeed numerous challenges facing these processors, and the major constraint was found to be lack of capital; an issue causing or worsening a majority of the other challenges at hand. Other problems are related to raw material, equipment & electricity for processing, regulations, market accessibility, and competition. These obstacles need to be overcome in order to enable the industry's expansion within and outside of Tanzania, and further research is recommended. Keywords: Agribusiness; Micro and small-scale businesses; Firm growth; Food value chain; Agro-processing Cover photo: Sunflower farm, Babati © Mikaela Ekblom 2016-02-16 Acknowledgements Stockholm, June 2016 Before getting started, I would like to take this opportunity to show my gratitude to everyone who made this thesis possible.
    [Show full text]
  • PROFILE of ARUSHA REGION Arusha Region Is One of Tanzania's 31 Administrative Regions
    PROFILE OF ARUSHA REGION Arusha Region is one of Tanzania's 31 administrative regions. Its capital and largest city is the city of Arusha. The region is bordered by Kajiado County and Narok County in Kenya to the north, the Kilimanjaro Region to the east, the Manyara and Singida regions to the south, and the Mara and Simiyu regions to the west. Major towns include Monduli, Namanga, Longido, and Loliondo to the north, Mto wa Mbu and Karatu to the west, and Usa River to the east. The region is comparable in size to the combined land and water areas of the United States state of Maryland] Arusha Region is a global tourist destination and is the center of the northern Tanzania safari circuit. The national parks and reserves in this region include Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Arusha National Park, the Loliondo Game Controlled Area, and part of Lake Manyara National Park. Remains of 600-year-old stone structures are found at Engaruka, just off the dirt road between Mto wa Mbu and Lake Natron. With a HDI of 0.721, Arusha is one among the most developed regions of Tanzania. History Much of the present area of Arusha Region used to be Maasai land. The Maasai are still the dominant community in the region. their influence is reflected in the present names of towns, regional culture, cuisine, and geographical features. The administrative region of Arusha existed in 1922 while mainland Tanzania was a British mandate under the League of Nations and known as Tanganyika. In 1948, the area was in the Northern Province, which includes the present day regions of Manyara and Kilimanjaro.
    [Show full text]
  • 13. Laddunnuri Maternal Mortatlity Tanzaniax
    International Journal of Caring Sciences 2013 May - August Vol 6 Issue 2 236 . O R I G I N A L P A P E R .r . Maternal Mortality in Rural Areas of Dodoma Region, Tanzania: a Qualitative Study Madan Mohan Laddunuri, PhD Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Dodoma University, Dodoma, Tanzania Coresponcence: Dr Madan Mohan Laddunuri, Post Box 259 Dodoma university, Dodoma, Tanzania. E-mail [email protected] Abstract Background: A major public health concern in Tanzania is the high rate of maternal deaths as the estimated Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) is 454 per 100,000 live births (TDHS, 2010). The main objective of the present study was to find out the contributing factors to maternal mortality in rural areas of Dodoma region of Tanzania. Methodology: The verbal autopsy technique was used to reconstruct “the road to maternal death.” A structured open-ended questionnaire was developed on the basis of the “three delays” model: delay in the decision to seek care, delay in arrival at a health facility and delay in the provision of adequate care. The sample comprised of 20 cases, 4 for each district of Dodoma. Data were collected by conducting in-depth interviews with close relatives of the deceased women and those who accompanied the women (neighbours) during the time the illness developed to death. Results: There was delay in receiving appropriate medical care and that eventually lead to the death of the pregnant woman, due to underestimation of the severity of the complication, bad experience with the health care system, delay in reaching an appropriate medical facility, lack of transportation, or delay in receiving appropriate care after reaching to the hospital.
    [Show full text]