DOCSLIB.ORG

Chestnut Commons

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chestnut Commons Click images to view full size Chestnut Commons Austin, Texas Project Type: Mixed Residential Volume 38 Number 23 October–December 2008 Case Number: C038023 PROJECT TYPE Situated in a rapidly gentrifying neighborhood in Austin, Texas, Chestnut Commons is a transit-oriented infill community featuring 32 cottage-style residences and 32 for-sale flats above garages. This housing typology— smaller-than-average homes arranged to maximize density—has the advantage of making homeownership more affordable, with initial sales prices ranging from $149,000 to $260,000. The developers of Chestnut Commons— locally based Momark Development, LLC, and Benchmark Land Development— donate half of the project’s profits (beyond an initial 20 percent gross profit threshold) to the nonprofit Austin Community Foundation, resulting in a total contribution of over $1.1 million toward community development in the city. LOCATION Central City SITE SIZE 3.89 acres/1.57 hectares LAND USES Single-Family Detached Residential, Condominiums KEYWORDS/SPECIAL FEATURES For-Sale Housing Mixed Residential Workforce Housing PROJECT ADDRESS 601 Miriam Avenue Austin, Texas WEB SITE www.austinchestnut.com DEVELOPERS Momark Development, LLC Austin, Texas 512-391-1789 www.momarkdevelopment.com Benchmark Land Development Austin, Texas 512-472-7455 www.benchmarktx.net BUILDER Armadillo Homes San Antonio, Texas 210-662-0066 ARCHITECT * some assembly required 512-467-2888 PLANNER Bosse & Turner Associates Austin, Texas 512-472-7332 www.btaaustin.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TBG Partners Austin, Texas 512-327-1011 www.tbg-inc.com GENERAL DESCRIPTION Mixing 32 small two-story, for-sale detached single-family houses and 32 one-bedroom flats built over garages, Chestnut Commons is a transit-oriented infill project in a diverse and gentrifying neighborhood a little over a mile (1.6 km) east of downtown Austin, Texas. Characterized by compact lots, the project features common areas: a large courtyard and a number of small, informal gathering spaces. Each of the 64 dwellings on the site has its own garage, accessed by an alley or a sidestreet. Located behind the detached houses, garages are grouped in sets of four per building. Atop each of these structures sit two one-bedroom flats. The entire 3.89-acre (1.57-ha) development is under condominium ownership, in which buyers purchase the interior spaces, but the homeowners association owns all of the outdoor space as well as the exteriors of the buildings. BACKGROUND Chestnut Commons is part of a larger development that was inspired by the desire of Tom Meredith—a former chief financial officer at Dell Computer—to give back to his community. Purchasing 22 acres (8.9 ha) of unused land in the at-risk neighborhood of East Austin, he envisioned a transit-oriented community that would improve the character of the existing neighborhood, thus benefiting longtime residents as well as newcomers. At the eastern edge of this property, the Martin Luther King, Jr., Capital MetroRail station is under construction as of fall 2008. Capital MetroRail’s Red Line will carry commuters 32 miles (51 km) from the suburbs into downtown Austin when it opens in March 2009. As part of Chestnut Commons’ development process, Meredith sold four acres of the site to the Austin Community Foundation (ACF), a philanthropic nonprofit organization with a mission to improve the quality of life in Austin through funding a broad array of services including community development. The ACF then sold the four acres to regional development firms Momark Development and Benchmark Land Development in exchange for a portion of the project’s returns. The deal called for the developers to donate half of the project’s profits, once the project had exceeded a 20 percent gross profit. As of November 2008, with only two units in Chestnut Commons left to sell, the development team has donated $1.1 million to the ACF. As of fall 2008, about $250,000 from this fund has been given to Habitat for Humanity to repair existing housing for elderly residents in the surrounding neighborhood. To develop Chestnut Commons, Momark and Benchmark created a limited partnership. In this partnership, Benchmark brought its financial relationships and experience gained from leading the development of Plum Creek—one of the area’s first new urbanist communities—to the table. Momark’s role in the process focused on product development and marketing, as well as managing much of the site preparation and landscaping. Together, the two firms hired Armadillo Homes, a homebuilder with projects in Laredo, Austin, and San Antonio, to build and sell the residences. THE SITE AND ITS SURROUNDINGS Chestnut Commons is located near downtown Austin, in the rapidly changing neighborhood of East Austin, which is bordered by Lady Bird Lake (a damned segment of the Colorado River, which cleaves through the middle of Austin) to the south, Interstate 35 to the west, Airport Boulevard to the east, and 51st Street to the north. Originally a community that was occupied predominantly by lower-income African American and Latino residents, East Austin has been gaining in popularity with a whiter, more professional demographic. Ten years ago, the average house in the area was worth about $40,000 to $50,000 and the price per square foot was approximately $60 ($645.83 per sq m). As of fall 2008, prices there can exceed $300 per foot ($3,229.17 per sq m). The neighborhood’s proximity to the campus of the University of Texas and to downtown has become a major draw for homebuyers, especially as traffic worsens in the region. As mentioned previously, Chestnut Commons is part of the larger 22-acre (8.9-ha) triangular property purchased by Meredith. The Meredith property was originally owned by the Featherlite Building Products Corporation and was used to store giant precast concrete slabs that were intended for use in large-scale construction projects. Surrounded by pre–World War II bungalows and postwar ranch houses, the property is bordered on the north by Martin Luther King Boulevard, a major east–west arterial in East Austin. Cutting diagonally across the street grid, the aforementioned Capital Metro train tracks mark the eastern property line and Miriam Avenue defines the western boundary. While Miriam Avenue serves as the western boundary for most of the 22-acre (8.9-ha) property, at this corner of the site the property extends half a block further toward the west of Miriam between East 16th and East 14th streets (there is no East 15th Street). Chestnut Commons’ northern boundary is East 17th Street and its southern boundary is East 14th Street. The eastern edge of the project is marked by a private alley that provides access to the garages. Surrounded by a chain link fence, the property sat unused for a long time. People would routinely cut the fence and use the weed-covered area as a dump. Because the property is located at the bottom of a hill, drainage was a challenge and the southern end of the site had a history of flooding. Large chunks of concrete, gravel, and random junk excavated from the site led the development team to believe that people added these materials to elevate the land out of the floodplain. Much grading work had to be done, the storm sewer system was channelized, an adjacent creek was cleaned up, and a blockage in the preexisting stormwater system needed to be removed. The Chestnut Commons site was treated separately from the larger property because of the more acute drainage challenges and because of how this section interfaces with the community. DESIGN Chestnut Commons was designed so that most of the 32 bungalows face Miriam Avenue, while the garages and the flats above them were placed behind the houses and are accessed by alleys. Because the development team extended Miriam Avenue farther south from 16th Street to 14th Street, this section of Miriam is a private road that is owned by the homeowners association. Between 16th and 14th streets, the houses line both sides of Miriam; however, between 16th and 17th the cottages are only on the eastern side of the street. The design goal was to integrate a higher-density community within the existing community—namely, to have the “look and feel” of a single-family community with the benefits of a higher-density project. Ranging in size from 667 to 1,394 square feet (62 to 129.5 sq m), two-story pitched-roof bungalows are clad in bold-colored HardiPlank (a durable cement fiber product that resembles wood clapboard), all with white trim. Six of the houses are arranged in a courtyard designed to be a meeting area, and the mailboxes for all 64 units are located there. Between the houses and the garage/flats are pedestrian paths that run the length of the project. Smaller nodes along the paths allow residents to interact. Amenities such as fire pits, picnic tables, special plantings, and fountains give each of these nodes its own character. All of the nodes are intended to replace privately owned outdoor space. Because East Austin is not known for its schools, the developers assumed that there would be few children at Chestnut Commons and therefore none of these nodes is designed with children in mind. Most of the garage buildings are paired so that the garage doors face each other. On the opposite sides of these structures are pedestrian entrances and more landscaped areas. Chris Allen, the primary architect of the locally based firm called *some assembly required, designed Chestnut Commons from what the development team describes as a three-dimensional perspective. Because much of the Austin-area real estate market is composed of lower-density, single-family homes, it was important for the development team to have a designer who could think beyond the suburban tract house model and plan for the challenges of constructing buildings that would be so close to each other.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CRA Evaluation Charter No. 16626
    PUBLIC DISCLOSURE May 4, 2016 COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Central National Bank Charter Number 16626 8320 W. Highway 84, Waco, TX 76712 Office of the Comptroller of the Currency 225 E. John Carpenter Freeway, Suite 900, Irving, Texas 75062 NOTE: This document is an evaluation of this institution’s record of meeting the credit needs of its entire community, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods consistent with safe and sound operation of the institution. This evaluation is not, nor should it be construed as, an assessment of the financial condition of this institution. The rating assigned to this institution does not represent an analysis, conclusion, or opinion of the federal financial supervisory agency concerning the safety and soundness of this financial institution. Charter Number 16626 INSTITUTION'S CRA RATING: This institution is rated Satisfactory. The Lending Test is rated: Satisfactory. The Community Development Test is rated: Outstanding. Major factors that support this Satisfactory rating include: • The bank’s loan-to-deposit (LTD) ratio is reasonable. • A majority of loan originations and purchases are within the bank’s assessment area (AA). • The distribution of residential and business loans to borrowers of different income levels exhibits reasonable penetration. • The bank’s geographic distribution of residential and business loans to low- and moderate-income (LMI) census tracts reflects reasonable dispersion. • The overall level of responsiveness of community development (CD) lending, investments, and services is excellent. 1 Charter Number 16626 Scope of Examination The Performance Evaluation (PE) assesses the bank’s record of meeting the credit needs of the communities in which it operates.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Austin
    OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED JULY 23, 2019 New Issues: Book-Entry-Only System Ratings: Moody’s: “A1” (stable outlook) S&P: “A” (positive outlook) Kroll: “AA-” (stable outlook) (See “OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION – Ratings”) In the opinion of Bracewell LLP, Bond Counsel, under existing law, (i) interest on the 2019A Bonds is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes, and (ii) the 2019A Bonds are not “private activity bonds.” Further, in the opinion of Bond Counsel, under existing law, (i) interest on the 2019B Bonds is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes, except for any period during which a 2019B Bond is held by a person who is a “substantial user” of the facilities financed with the proceeds of the 2019B Bonds or a “related person” to such a “substantial user,” each within the meaning of section 147(a) of the Code and (ii) interest on the 2019B Bonds is an item of tax preference that is includable in alternative minimum taxable income for purposes of determining a taxpayer’s alternative minimum tax liability. See “TAX MATTERS” for a discussion of the opinions of Bond Counsel. CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS $16,975,000 $248,170,000 Airport System Revenue Bonds, Airport System Revenue Bonds, Series 2019A Series 2019B (AMT) Dated: August 1, 2019; Interest to accrue from Date of Initial Delivery Due: As shown on the inside cover page The $16,975,000 City of Austin, Texas Airport System Revenue Bonds, Series 2019A (the “2019A Bonds”) and the $248,170,000 City of Austin, Texas Airport System Revenue Bonds, Series 2019B (AMT) (the “2019B Bonds” and, collectively with the 2019A Bonds, the “Bonds”), are limited special obligations of the City of Austin, Texas (the “City”), issued pursuant to the ordinances adopted by the City on June 19, 2019 (the “Ordinances”).
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2016 Operating & Capital Budget & 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan
    PROPOSED FY 2016 Operating & Capital Budget & 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority | Austin, Texas Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Proposed FY 2016 Operating and Capital Budget and Five Year Capital Improvement Plan Table of Contents Organization of the Budget Document ....................................................................................... 1 Transmittal Letter ....................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction History and Service Area ..................................................................................................... 4 Capital Metro Service Area Map .......................................................................................... 4 Community Information and Capital Metro Involvement ..................................................... 5 Benefits of Public Transportation......................................................................................... 6 Governance ......................................................................................................................... 7 Management ........................................................................................................................ 8 System Facility Characteristics ............................................................................................ 9 MetroRail Red Line Service Map ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sounder Commuter Rail (Seattle)
    Public Use of Rail Right-of-Way in Urban Areas Final Report PRC 14-12 F Public Use of Rail Right-of-Way in Urban Areas Texas A&M Transportation Institute PRC 14-12 F December 2014 Authors Jolanda Prozzi Rydell Walthall Megan Kenney Jeff Warner Curtis Morgan Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ 8 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. 9 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 10 Sharing Rail Infrastructure ........................................................................................................ 10 Three Scenarios for Sharing Rail Infrastructure ................................................................... 10 Shared-Use Agreement Components .................................................................................... 12 Freight Railroad Company Perspectives ............................................................................... 12 Keys to Negotiating Successful Shared-Use Agreements .................................................... 13 Rail Infrastructure Relocation ................................................................................................... 15 Benefits of Infrastructure Relocation ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • St. Mark's Medical Office Building Two St
    ST. MARK'S MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING TWO ST. MARK'S PLACE | LA GRANGE, TX 78945 OFFERING MEMORANDUM DISCLAIMER ST. MARK'S MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Colliers International Brokerage Company (“Broker“) has been retained as the exclusive advisor and broker for this offering. TWO ST. MARK'S PLACE This Offering Memorandum has been prepared by Broker for use by a limited number of parties and does not purport to provide a necessarily LA GRANGE, TX 78945 accurate summary of the Property or any of the documents related thereto, nor does it purport to be all-inclusive or to contain all of the information which prospective Buyers may need or desire. All projections have been developed by Broker and designated sources and are based upon assumptions relating to the general economy, competition, and other factors beyond the control of the Seller and therefore are subject to variation. No representation is made by Broker or the Seller as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, and nothing contained herein shall be relied on as a promise or representation as to the future performance of the Property. Although the information contained EXCLUSIVE INVESTMENT ADVISORY TEAM herein is believed to be correct, the Seller and its employees disclaim any responsibility for inaccuracies and expect prospective purchasers to exercise independent due diligence in verifying all such information. Further, Broker, the Seller and its employees disclaim any and all liability for representations and warranties, expressed and implied, contained in or omitted from the Offering Memorandum or any other written or oral communication transmitted or made available to the Buyer.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Oriented Development: a Presentation for Partnerships In
    Transit Oriented Development Austin, Texas A Presentation for Partnerships in Transit Workshop October 23, 2008 Doug Allen, Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer Central Texas quality of life Quality public transportation can protect Austin’s way of life Austin residents say the number one challenge facing the Austin community is traffic congestion, according to a survey by Envision Central Texas. What are the most important issues to address to ensure a positive future for Central Texas? (choose three) Transportation/Congestion 66.6% Land Use 34.1% Cost of Living 30.9% Water Availability 28.2% Air Quality 27.8% –SOURCE: ECT online survey of Central Texas residents, 2008 Capital Metro Service Area: 500 square miles - Austin - Jonestown - Lago Vista - Leander - Manor - San Leanna - portion of Travis Co. - portion of Williamson Co. Capital Metro Today Fixed Route Bus System – 134 routes including local, express & “Dillo” trolley – 3,300 stops – 12 Park and Rides Texas Transit Association: “Best in Texas” – 2007 “Outstanding Metropolitan Transportation System” Highest per capita ridership in Texas – 140,000+ one-way trips every day – 36 million projected total annual boardings in 2009 All Systems Go! Long Range Transit Plan Layers of service –Local Bus Service –Express Bus –Capital MetroRail –Rapid Bus –Potential Future Service Capital MetroRail Overview Downtown Plaza Saltillo MLK, Jr. Highland Mall Crestview Kramer Howard Lakeline Leander MetroRail Stations Plaza Saltillo Leander Lakeline Transit Oriented Development: Capital Metro Goals Ridership—TOD housing provides riders. TOD commercial and retail provides destinations. Revenue—Sales tax. Property tax. For land we own, development revenue. Community—TOD adds another lifestyle choice to the regional portfolio.
    [Show full text]
  • August 21, 2019
    NEW ISSUE: BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY OFFERING MEMORANDUM Ratings: S&P: PSF Enhanced: “AAA”; Underlying: “AA+” August 21, 2019 Ratings: Fitch: PSF Enhanced: “AAA”; Underlying: “AA+” PSF Guarantee: “Conditionally Approved” (See “RATINGS” and “THE PERMANENT SCHOOL FUND GUARANTEE PROGRAM”.) In the opinion of Bond Counsel (identified below), assuming continuing compliance by the District (defined below) after the date of initial delivery of the Bonds (defined below) with certain covenants contained in the Order (defined below) and subject to the matters set forth under “TAX MATTERS” herein, interest on the Bonds for federal income tax purposes under existing statutes, regulations, published rulings, and court decisions (1) is not included in gross income of the owners thereof pursuant to section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended to the date of initial delivery of the Bonds, and (2) is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax. See “TAX MATTERS” herein. Additionally, see “THE BONDS - Determination of Interest Rate; Rate Mode Changes” identifying circumstances when an opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel is required as a condition for an interest mode conversion. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion as to the effect on the excludability from gross income for federal income tax purposes of any action requiring such an opinion. $14,930,000 EANES INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT (A political subdivision of the State of Texas located in Travis County, Texas) VARIABLE RATE UNLIMITED TAX SCHOOL BUILDING BONDS, SERIES 2019B INITIAL TERM RATE PERIOD OF SIX YEARS AT A PER ANNUM INITIAL RATE OF 1.75% (PRICED TO YIELD 1.35% TO FIRST OPTIONAL REDEMPTION DATE OF AUGUST 1, 2024) Dated Date: September 1, 2019 (interest will accrue from the Delivery Date) Mandatory Tender Date: August 1, 2025 CUSIP No.
    [Show full text]
  • Plum Creek Kyle Texas
    Plum Creek Kyle, Texas Project Type: Residential Case No: C036013 Year: 2006 SUMMARY Plum Creek is a master-planned community located in Kyle, Texas, approximately 20 miles (32 kilometers) south of Austin. Developed by Benchmark Land Development, it is the first large-scale community in the Austin metropolitan area built according to the principles of new urbanism. At buildout, the 2,200-acre (890-hectare) development will contain up to 8,700 homes, a mixed-use town center, employment districts, and a commuter rail station. FEATURES Master-Planned Community—Large Scale Transit-Oriented Development Pedestrian-Friendly Design Traditional Neighborhood Development Plum Creek Kyle, Texas Project Type: Residential Subcategory: Planned Communities Volume 36 Number 13 July–September 2006 Case Number: C036013 PROJECT TYPE Plum Creek is a master-planned community located in Kyle, Texas, approximately 20 miles (32 kilometers) south of Austin. Developed by Benchmark Land Development, it is the first large-scale community in the Austin metropolitan area built according to the principles of new urbanism. At buildout, the 2,200-acre (890-hectare) development will contain up to 8,700 homes, a mixed-use town center, employment districts, and a commuter rail station. LOCATION Outer Suburban SITE SIZE 2,200 acres/890 hectares LAND USES Single-Family Detached Residential, Townhouses, Condominiums, Apartments, Neighborhood Retail Center, Schools, Golf Course, Open Space KEYWORDS/SPECIAL FEATURES Master-Planned Community—Large Scale Transit-Oriented Development Pedestrian-Friendly Design Traditional Neighborhood Development PROJECT WEB SITE www.plumcreektx.com DEVELOPER Benchmark Land Development, Inc. Austin, Texas 512-472-7455 www.benchmarktx.net LAND PLANNER TBG Partners, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of ROUND ROCK TRANSIT PLAN Existing Conditions Report
    [NAME OF DOCUMENT] | VOLUME [Client Name] CITY OF ROUND ROCK TRANSIT PLAN Existing Conditions Report June 2015 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. | i Round Rock Transit Plan - Existing Conditions Report City of Round Rock Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................1-1 2 Document Review ............................................................................................................2-2 Round Rock General Plan 2020 ......................................................................................................... 2-2 Round Rock Transportation Master Plan ........................................................................................... 2-3 Round Rock Downtown Master Plan ................................................................................................... 2-3 Project Connect ....................................................................................................................................... 2-4 Commuter Express Bus Plan ................................................................................................................. 2-7 3 Review of Existing Services .............................................................................................3-1 Demand Response ................................................................................................................................. 3-1 Reverse Commute .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Austin System Map G 1L N
    Leander Leander Park & Ride 983 986 987 183 S o u t h B e l l Bl vd 983 986 987 214 214 ne Blvd testo 1431 Whi r D n e re 214 rg e v E Main 214 St 1431 La ke li ne 214 B lv 983 Jonestown d Park & Ride 985 214 d el R ur a L 214 Bro nc o d R Bar-K anch L R n LeanderLeander Lago Vista HS Park & Ride 183 214 183 Rd ch Lakeline an Post Office 383 214 R K Co r- yo 983 987 Northwest a te B Tr 214 383 Park & Ride P a 214 383 s P 983 985 e e o d 985 983 985 987 c R 987 a d n e P d a r r k d V o lv a B F 214 B c l Lakeline v p a to n d es k a 383 a Mall L R d m Pace Bend h North Fork o Recreation Area L Plaza (LCRA-County) 1431 383 Forest North ES WalMart 983 1431 Lakeline Plaza 985 1 Jonestown 987 TOLL Park & Ride Target Lago Vista 214 Park & Ride D 183 aw Lakeline 214 n Rd Northwest Park & Ride ek ke Cre Routes 383, 983, 985 and 987 La Pkwy continue, see inset at left. Route Finder Grisham MS M i l Westwood HS l Local Service Routes (01-99) w 1 r i TOLL Austin System Map g 1L N. Lamar/S. Congress, via Lamar S Lago Vista h ho Anderson t r 1M N.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Around in Austin
    GETTING AROUND IN AUSTIN Austin-Bergstrom International Airport (AUS) Austin-Bergstrom International Airport (ABIA) is a state-of-the-art airport with 25 gates, full customs facilities ready for the international traveler, and two parallel runways including a 12,250 foot runway. Easy to get to (only seven and a half miles from the Austin Convention Center), the airport saw an all-time passenger record of nearly 11.9 million passengers in 2015, up 11% from 2014. In operation since 1999, the airport has roughly 300 daily flights with nonstop service to 45+ destinations including international flights to London, Cancun, Guadalajara, San Jose Del Cabo and Toronto, and seasonal summer flights to Frankfurt, Germany. Austin is one of only seven airports with year-round service to all United Airlines hubs. Live music has been a distinguishing feature of the airport since its Music in the Air program launched in June 1999, just one month after the airport opened. What started as two performances per week has grown to 23 shows per week in six different venues throughout the airport: Ray Benson’s Roadhouse, the Saxon Pub, Annie’s Café & Bar, Earl Campbell’s Sports Bar, Austin City Limits/Waterloo Records & Video, and Ruta Maya. ABIA participates in the Transportation Security Administration’s (TSA) Pre-Check and Customs and Border Protection’s Global Entry program. Construction begins in 2016 on a nine-gate terminal expansion. ABIA reported 1,190 live music performances, 65.5 tons of brisket and 693,375 breakfast tacos were enjoyed by its passengers in 2015. ABIA ranked third among airports in North America for Airport Service Quality (ASQ) in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Two Monitoring Systems for Significant Bridges in Texas
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-04/0-4096-1 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Evaluation of Two Monitoring Systems for Significant January 2004 Bridges in Texas 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. C. T. Bilich and S. L. Wood Research Report 0-4096-1 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research 11. Contract or Grant No. The University of Texas at Austin Research Project 0-4096 3208 Red River, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78705-2650 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Research Report (9/01- 8/03) Research and Technology Implementation Office P.O. Box 5080 Austin, TX 78763-5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Project conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and the Texas Department of Transportation 16. Abstract Two monitoring systems for bridges were evaluated for use by the Texas Department of Transportation. The first system was designed to increase the quantitative information obtained during a routine inspection of a steel bridge. The miniature, battery-powered data acquisition system selected for study has the ability to record a single channel of strain data and use a rainflow counting algorithm to evaluate the raw data. This system was considered to be particularly useful for evaluating fracture critical bridges. The second system provided long-term monitoring of bridge displacements using global positioning systems (GPS).
    [Show full text]