Capmetro REMAP Campaign Creative-Ffa63b77.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
FY 2016 Operating & Capital Budget & 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan
PROPOSED FY 2016 Operating & Capital Budget & 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority | Austin, Texas Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Proposed FY 2016 Operating and Capital Budget and Five Year Capital Improvement Plan Table of Contents Organization of the Budget Document ....................................................................................... 1 Transmittal Letter ....................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction History and Service Area ..................................................................................................... 4 Capital Metro Service Area Map .......................................................................................... 4 Community Information and Capital Metro Involvement ..................................................... 5 Benefits of Public Transportation......................................................................................... 6 Governance ......................................................................................................................... 7 Management ........................................................................................................................ 8 System Facility Characteristics ............................................................................................ 9 MetroRail Red Line Service Map ...................................................................................... -
Sounder Commuter Rail (Seattle)
Public Use of Rail Right-of-Way in Urban Areas Final Report PRC 14-12 F Public Use of Rail Right-of-Way in Urban Areas Texas A&M Transportation Institute PRC 14-12 F December 2014 Authors Jolanda Prozzi Rydell Walthall Megan Kenney Jeff Warner Curtis Morgan Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ 8 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. 9 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 10 Sharing Rail Infrastructure ........................................................................................................ 10 Three Scenarios for Sharing Rail Infrastructure ................................................................... 10 Shared-Use Agreement Components .................................................................................... 12 Freight Railroad Company Perspectives ............................................................................... 12 Keys to Negotiating Successful Shared-Use Agreements .................................................... 13 Rail Infrastructure Relocation ................................................................................................... 15 Benefits of Infrastructure Relocation ................................................................................... -
Resolution #20-9
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BOARD RESOLUTION #20-9 RESOLUTION TO ENDORSE THE UPDATED BALTIMORE REGION COORDINATED PUBLIC TRANSIT – HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board (BRTB) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Baltimore region, encompassing the Baltimore Urbanized Area, and includes official representatives of the cities of Annapolis and Baltimore; the counties of Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, Howard, and Queen Anne’s; and representatives of the Maryland Departments of Transportation, the Environment, Planning, the Maryland Transit Administration, Harford Transit; and WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Baltimore region, has responsibility under the provisions of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act for developing and carrying out a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process for the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration, a modal division of the U.S. Department of Transportation, requires under FAST Act the establishment of a locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation plan. Previously, under MAP-21, legislation combined the New Freedom Program and the Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program into a new Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program, better known as Section 5310. Guidance on the new program was provided in Federal Transit Administration Circular 9070.1G released on June 6, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration requires a plan to be developed and periodically updated by a process that includes representatives of public, private, and nonprofit transportation and human services providers and participation by the public. -
Part 1: Downtown Transit Center and Circulator Shuttle
Howard Research and Development Corporation Downtown Columbia Downtown Transit Center and Circulator Shuttle Feasibility Study: Part 1 - Downtown Transit Center & Downtown Circulator Shuttle (Part of CEPPA #5) DRAFTDecember 2011 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. iv Chapter 1. Downtown Columbia Transit Center ....................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2. Downtown Columbia Circulator Shuttle ............................................................................................... 12 Appendix A. Regional Transit System Evaluation .............................................................................................. 21 Appendix B. Regional Transit Market Analysis .................................................................................................. 46 Appendix C. Transit Circulator Design ................................................................................................................ 64 Appendix D. Transit Center Site Evaluation ...................................................................................................... 764 Appendix E. Transit Development Plan ............................................................................................................... 79 DRAFT Page i• Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. Table of Figures Figure 1 Existing -
Transit Oriented Development: a Presentation for Partnerships In
Transit Oriented Development Austin, Texas A Presentation for Partnerships in Transit Workshop October 23, 2008 Doug Allen, Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer Central Texas quality of life Quality public transportation can protect Austin’s way of life Austin residents say the number one challenge facing the Austin community is traffic congestion, according to a survey by Envision Central Texas. What are the most important issues to address to ensure a positive future for Central Texas? (choose three) Transportation/Congestion 66.6% Land Use 34.1% Cost of Living 30.9% Water Availability 28.2% Air Quality 27.8% –SOURCE: ECT online survey of Central Texas residents, 2008 Capital Metro Service Area: 500 square miles - Austin - Jonestown - Lago Vista - Leander - Manor - San Leanna - portion of Travis Co. - portion of Williamson Co. Capital Metro Today Fixed Route Bus System – 134 routes including local, express & “Dillo” trolley – 3,300 stops – 12 Park and Rides Texas Transit Association: “Best in Texas” – 2007 “Outstanding Metropolitan Transportation System” Highest per capita ridership in Texas – 140,000+ one-way trips every day – 36 million projected total annual boardings in 2009 All Systems Go! Long Range Transit Plan Layers of service –Local Bus Service –Express Bus –Capital MetroRail –Rapid Bus –Potential Future Service Capital MetroRail Overview Downtown Plaza Saltillo MLK, Jr. Highland Mall Crestview Kramer Howard Lakeline Leander MetroRail Stations Plaza Saltillo Leander Lakeline Transit Oriented Development: Capital Metro Goals Ridership—TOD housing provides riders. TOD commercial and retail provides destinations. Revenue—Sales tax. Property tax. For land we own, development revenue. Community—TOD adds another lifestyle choice to the regional portfolio. -
Center for Advanced Multimodal Mobility Solutions and Education
Center for Advanced Multimodal Mobility Solutions and Education Project ID: 2017 Project 03 Forecasting Ridership for Commuter Rail in Austin Final Report by Scott Kilgore, M.S. The University of Texas at Austin and Randy Machemehl, Ph.D., P.E. (ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4045-2023) Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering The University of Texas at Austin 301 E. Dean Keeton Street, Stop C1761, Austin, TX 78712 Phone: 1-512-471-4541; Email: [email protected] for Center for Advanced Multimodal Mobility Solutions and Education (CAMMSE @ UNC Charlotte) The University of North Carolina at Charlotte 9201 University City Blvd Charlotte, NC 28223 September 2018 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project was funded by the Center for Advanced Multimodal Mobility Solutions and Education (CAMMSE @ UNC Charlotte), one of the Tier I University Transportation Centers that were selected in this nationwide competition, by the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology (OST-R), U.S. Department of Transportation (US DOT), under the FAST Act. The authors are also very grateful for all of the time and effort spent by DOT and industry professionals to provide project information that was critical for the successful completion of this study. DISCLAIMER The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are solely responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the material and information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation University Transportation Centers Program and Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. -
Work Your Way. Every Day
WORK YOUR WAY. EVERY DAY. AUSTIN, TEXAS HIGHLAND MALL BLVD A DIVERSE MIX. Residential ACC Future Phase Residential Office/ 1 Office/ Commercial A VIBRANT ECOSYSTEM. 2 Commercial WILL DAVIS DR Office/ ACC DENSON DR Commercial Phase 1 WAY KINSLOW STEPHEN JONATHAN DR JONATHAN Austin’s newest opportunity Highland By The Numbers HAGE DR 35 Office/ is on its way. Residential Commercial St. John’s ACC ACC ACC Encampment Phase 2 Future Phase Commons Y LAND AREA SIGNATURE OPEN SPACE A W Retail Below ACC HIGHLAND CAMPUS DR CAMPUS HIGHLAND ACC D L Office/ E An energetic, walkable and transit-friendly 3 I F T Commercial JACOB FONTAINE LN A H S HIGHLAND A mixed-use neighborhood is emerging in the WILHELMINA DELCO DR ACRES NEW PARKS M STATION O Proposed H 3 ACC T 81 relocation heart of Austin. Highland brings together a rich Phase 2 Retail Below mix of uses with 865,000+ square feet of Class ACC Future ACC Phase Duval St Residential Corporate MIDDLE FISKVILLE RD A office space, hundreds of new apartments NEW TRAILS RESIDENTIAL Academic and shops—and a new high-tech instructional MILES UNITS CLAYTON LN space built in partnership with ACC, one of Office/ 1.25 1,320 4 Office/Commercial Commercial Retail Below the nation’s most forward-thinking community TIRADO ST Residential AIRPORT BLVD college systems. At Highland, you’re not just Residential OFFICE ACC - HIGH TECH CAMPUS ACC doing business the smart way; you’re doing Potential Retail Below business your way. ACC SF SF HQ 1,065,000 1,300,000 Parking Garage CLAYTON LN RETAIL POTENTIAL POPULATION Highland 1 Highland 2 Highland 3 Highland 4 290 150,000 SF 28,600 150K - 500K SF 250K SF 250K SF 65K SF E KOENIG LN Developable Class A Office Space Developable Class A Office Space Developable Class A Office Space Developable Class A Office Space Structure Parked: 4/1,000 Structure Parked: 4/1,000 Structure Parked: 4/1,000 Structure Parked: 5/1,000 Conceptual Plan Subject to Change REINLI ST HIGHLAND 2 BUILT FOR BUSINESS ALL YOU NEED—AND THEN SOME. -
Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present
Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district 1964-2021 By Jonathan Belcher with thanks to Richard Barber and Thomas J. Humphrey Compilation of this data would not have been possible without the information and input provided by Mr. Barber and Mr. Humphrey. Sources of data used in compiling this information include public timetables, maps, newspaper articles, MBTA press releases, Department of Public Utilities records, and MBTA records. Thanks also to Tadd Anderson, Charles Bahne, Alan Castaline, George Chiasson, Bradley Clarke, Robert Hussey, Scott Moore, Edward Ramsdell, George Sanborn, David Sindel, James Teed, and George Zeiba for additional comments and information. Thomas J. Humphrey’s original 1974 research on the origin and development of the MBTA bus network is now available here and has been updated through August 2020: http://www.transithistory.org/roster/MBTABUSDEV.pdf August 29, 2021 Version Discussion of changes is broken down into seven sections: 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA 2) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Eastern Mass. St. Ry. Co. Norwood Area Quincy Area Lynn Area Melrose Area Lowell Area Lawrence Area Brockton Area 3) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Middlesex and Boston St. Ry. Co 4) MBTA bus routes inherited from Service Bus Lines and Brush Hill Transportation 5) MBTA bus routes initiated by the MBTA 1964-present ROLLSIGN 3 5b) Silver Line bus rapid transit service 6) Private carrier transit and commuter bus routes within or to the MBTA district 7) The Suburban Transportation (mini-bus) Program 8) Rail routes 4 ROLLSIGN Changes in MBTA Bus Routes 1964-present Section 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) succeeded the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) on August 3, 1964. -
Measuring the Effects of Austin's Transit-Oriented Development
Copyright by Cody Jack Lantelme 2020 The Report Committee for Cody Jack Lantelme Certifies that this is the approved version of the following Report: Measuring the Effects of Austin’s Transit-Oriented Development Zoning Districts through Multi-Family Property Analysis APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: Jake Wegmann, Supervisor Michael Oden Measuring the Effects of Austin’s Transit-Oriented Development Zoning Districts through Multi-Family Property Analysis by Cody Jack Lantelme Report Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science of Community and Regional Planning The University of Texas at Austin May 2020 Dedication This report is dedicated to my teachers, co-workers, classmates, and most of all to Kathryn and my parents, who have supported me every step of the way. To Mom, Dad, and Kathryn, I love y’all and appreciate you understanding, and supporting me through the stresses of grad school. To my readers, who provided excellent feedback, I cannot begin to thank you enough. And finally, to the team of Charles, Camiel, and Erin at Capitol Market Research, who provided PR feedback, career advice, and most importantly, one of the best work environments I could have ever asked for. Acknowledgements This report would not have been possible without feedback, data, and advice from the folks over at Capitol Market Research, Charles, Camiel, and Erin. All of the data in the case study analysis sections were gathered as part of CMR’s semi-annual update. vi Abstract Measuring the Effects of Austin’s Transit-Oriented Development Zoning Districts through Multi-Family Property Analysis Cody Jack Lantelme, M.S.C.R.P. -
2021 Bus Service Performance Review
2021 Wake Transit-Funded Bus Services Annual Performance Review – Town of Cary Discussion Disposition Matrix Project Route/Project CAMPO Question Project Sponsor Response/Disposition Sponsor Route 4: High House Road's productivity is starting The Town discussed the myriad of challenges facing Route 4’s performance. These include a hit to ridership during the pandemic as a result of not to rebound from its pandemic slump. Does current serving the Cary Senior Center next to Bond Park. During the quarters in which the senior center was not served, on-time performance was stellar. The ridership data follow the trend of relatively stronger senior center poses operational challenges via an unprotected left turn on High House Road and due to the pace of boarding and alighting. Service TO004-A: Sunday Service – mid-day and weekend ridership? If not, how do you providing direct access to shopping centers and residential communities that deviates from the route’s directness of travel along the corridor has also All Routes, Holiday Hours explain the increase in productivity? While posed challenges to successful on-time performance. Town staff removed a U-turn on Maynard Rd and has recommended removing some of the and Extended Paratransit; productivity is improving, Route 4 is still not where it shopping center deviations to increase on-time performance. It was further noted that a good amount of the on-time underperformance noted in Q3 of TO004-B: Increase Midday should be, and neither is its on-time performance. FY21 could be a result of operator error, as service changes with new turn-by-turn instructions were initiated during the quarter, and it takes time for Frequencies How does the Town plan on increasing productivity operators to get used to the changes. -
CITY of ROUND ROCK TRANSIT PLAN Existing Conditions Report
[NAME OF DOCUMENT] | VOLUME [Client Name] CITY OF ROUND ROCK TRANSIT PLAN Existing Conditions Report June 2015 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. | i Round Rock Transit Plan - Existing Conditions Report City of Round Rock Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................1-1 2 Document Review ............................................................................................................2-2 Round Rock General Plan 2020 ......................................................................................................... 2-2 Round Rock Transportation Master Plan ........................................................................................... 2-3 Round Rock Downtown Master Plan ................................................................................................... 2-3 Project Connect ....................................................................................................................................... 2-4 Commuter Express Bus Plan ................................................................................................................. 2-7 3 Review of Existing Services .............................................................................................3-1 Demand Response ................................................................................................................................. 3-1 Reverse Commute ................................................................................................................................. -
Austin System Map G 1L N
Leander Leander Park & Ride 983 986 987 183 S o u t h B e l l Bl vd 983 986 987 214 214 ne Blvd testo 1431 Whi r D n e re 214 rg e v E Main 214 St 1431 La ke li ne 214 B lv 983 Jonestown d Park & Ride 985 214 d el R ur a L 214 Bro nc o d R Bar-K anch L R n LeanderLeander Lago Vista HS Park & Ride 183 214 183 Rd ch Lakeline an Post Office 383 214 R K Co r- yo 983 987 Northwest a te B Tr 214 383 Park & Ride P a 214 383 s P 983 985 e e o d 985 983 985 987 c R 987 a d n e P d a r r k d V o lv a B F 214 B c l Lakeline v p a to n d es k a 383 a Mall L R d m Pace Bend h North Fork o Recreation Area L Plaza (LCRA-County) 1431 383 Forest North ES WalMart 983 1431 Lakeline Plaza 985 1 Jonestown 987 TOLL Park & Ride Target Lago Vista 214 Park & Ride D 183 aw Lakeline 214 n Rd Northwest Park & Ride ek ke Cre Routes 383, 983, 985 and 987 La Pkwy continue, see inset at left. Route Finder Grisham MS M i l Westwood HS l Local Service Routes (01-99) w 1 r i TOLL Austin System Map g 1L N. Lamar/S. Congress, via Lamar S Lago Vista h ho Anderson t r 1M N.