CITY of ROUND ROCK TRANSIT PLAN Existing Conditions Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CITY of ROUND ROCK TRANSIT PLAN Existing Conditions Report [NAME OF DOCUMENT] | VOLUME [Client Name] CITY OF ROUND ROCK TRANSIT PLAN Existing Conditions Report June 2015 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. | i Round Rock Transit Plan - Existing Conditions Report City of Round Rock Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................1-1 2 Document Review ............................................................................................................2-2 Round Rock General Plan 2020 ......................................................................................................... 2-2 Round Rock Transportation Master Plan ........................................................................................... 2-3 Round Rock Downtown Master Plan ................................................................................................... 2-3 Project Connect ....................................................................................................................................... 2-4 Commuter Express Bus Plan ................................................................................................................. 2-7 3 Review of Existing Services .............................................................................................3-1 Demand Response ................................................................................................................................. 3-1 Reverse Commute .................................................................................................................................. 3-5 Drive a Senior ......................................................................................................................................... 3-7 Regional Connections ............................................................................................................................ 3-8 Capital Metro Rideshare ...................................................................................................................... 3-9 4 Market Analysis ...............................................................................................................4-1 Employment Patterns ........................................................................................................................... 4-10 Austin Community College Student Origins .................................................................................... 4-16 5 Land Use and Infrastructure .............................................................................................5-1 Existing Land Use ................................................................................................................................... 5-1 Existing Transportation Infrastructure ................................................................................................ 5-2 Future Land Use ...................................................................................................................................... 5-5 Future Transportation Infrastructure ................................................................................................... 5-7 6 Peer Review .....................................................................................................................6-1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 6-1 Cary, North Carolina ............................................................................................................................ 6-3 Rock Hill, South Carolina ...................................................................................................................... 6-5 Murfreesboro, Tennessee ..................................................................................................................... 6-7 Rancho Cordova, California ................................................................................................................ 6-9 The Woodlands, Texas ....................................................................................................................... 6-11 Lewisville, Texas ................................................................................................................................... 6-13 McKinney, Texas .................................................................................................................................. 6-14 Summary ................................................................................................................................................ 6-15 7 Community Feedback ......................................................................................................7-1 Stakeholder Meetings ........................................................................................................................... 7-1 Online Survey ......................................................................................................................................... 7-5 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. | i Round Rock Transit Plan - Existing Conditions Report City of Round Rock Table of Figures Page Figure 1 Locally Preferred Alternatives Map ................................................................................. 2-6 Figure 2 Demand Response Trip Purpose (FY 2014) ..................................................................... 3-2 Figure 3 Demand Response Fare Type (FY 2014) ......................................................................... 3-2 Figure 4 Demand Response Performance (FY 2010 – FY 2014) ................................................ 3-3 Figure 5 Origins and Destinations of Demand Response Service (October 2014) ................. 3-4 Figure 6 Reverse Commute Route Alignment ................................................................................... 3-6 Figure 7 Drive-a-Senior Origin and Destination Locations (2014) ............................................. 3-7 Figure 8 Capital Metro Services at Tech Ridge and Howard ..................................................... 3-8 Figure 9 Capital MetroExpress bus ................................................................................................... 3-8 Figure 10 CARTS Interurban bus .......................................................................................................... 3-9 Figure 11 Population Density ................................................................................................................ 4-3 Figure 12 Young Adult Population ....................................................................................................... 4-4 Figure 13 Senior Population .................................................................................................................. 4-5 Figure 14 Low-Income Population ........................................................................................................ 4-6 Figure 15 Zero Vehicle Households ..................................................................................................... 4-7 Figure 16 Renter Population.................................................................................................................. 4-8 Figure 17 Transit Propensity Index ...................................................................................................... 4-9 Figure 18 Employment Density in Round Rock (2011) ................................................................... 4-11 Figure 19 Residential Locations of People Who Work in Round Rock ....................................... 4-12 Figure 20 Employment Locations for Round Rock Residents.......................................................... 4-13 Figure 21 Residential Locations for Low Income Round Rock Workers ...................................... 4-14 Figure 22 Employment Locations of Low-Income Workers in Round Rock ................................. 4-15 Figure 23 Austin Community College Student Origins ................................................................... 4-17 Figure 24 Current Land Use .................................................................................................................. 5-1 Figure 25 Pedestrian Infrastructure ..................................................................................................... 5-4 Figure 26 Future Land Use ..................................................................................................................... 5-6 Figure 27 Peer Cities Characteristics ................................................................................................... 6-1 Figure 28 Peer City Transit Services Provided .................................................................................. 6-2 Figure 29 Question 1: Have you taken transit within the past month? ......................................... 7-5 Figure 30 Question 2a: Which transit services do you take? ......................................................... 7-6 Figure 31 Question 2b: How long have you been riding transit? .................................................. 7-6 Figure 32 Question 2c: How often do you take transit? .................................................................. 7-7 Figure 33 Question 2d: Would you be interested in taking any of the following new services? .................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • FY 2016 Operating & Capital Budget & 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan
    PROPOSED FY 2016 Operating & Capital Budget & 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority | Austin, Texas Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Proposed FY 2016 Operating and Capital Budget and Five Year Capital Improvement Plan Table of Contents Organization of the Budget Document ....................................................................................... 1 Transmittal Letter ....................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction History and Service Area ..................................................................................................... 4 Capital Metro Service Area Map .......................................................................................... 4 Community Information and Capital Metro Involvement ..................................................... 5 Benefits of Public Transportation......................................................................................... 6 Governance ......................................................................................................................... 7 Management ........................................................................................................................ 8 System Facility Characteristics ............................................................................................ 9 MetroRail Red Line Service Map ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sounder Commuter Rail (Seattle)
    Public Use of Rail Right-of-Way in Urban Areas Final Report PRC 14-12 F Public Use of Rail Right-of-Way in Urban Areas Texas A&M Transportation Institute PRC 14-12 F December 2014 Authors Jolanda Prozzi Rydell Walthall Megan Kenney Jeff Warner Curtis Morgan Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ 8 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. 9 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 10 Sharing Rail Infrastructure ........................................................................................................ 10 Three Scenarios for Sharing Rail Infrastructure ................................................................... 10 Shared-Use Agreement Components .................................................................................... 12 Freight Railroad Company Perspectives ............................................................................... 12 Keys to Negotiating Successful Shared-Use Agreements .................................................... 13 Rail Infrastructure Relocation ................................................................................................... 15 Benefits of Infrastructure Relocation ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Oriented Development: a Presentation for Partnerships In
    Transit Oriented Development Austin, Texas A Presentation for Partnerships in Transit Workshop October 23, 2008 Doug Allen, Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer Central Texas quality of life Quality public transportation can protect Austin’s way of life Austin residents say the number one challenge facing the Austin community is traffic congestion, according to a survey by Envision Central Texas. What are the most important issues to address to ensure a positive future for Central Texas? (choose three) Transportation/Congestion 66.6% Land Use 34.1% Cost of Living 30.9% Water Availability 28.2% Air Quality 27.8% –SOURCE: ECT online survey of Central Texas residents, 2008 Capital Metro Service Area: 500 square miles - Austin - Jonestown - Lago Vista - Leander - Manor - San Leanna - portion of Travis Co. - portion of Williamson Co. Capital Metro Today Fixed Route Bus System – 134 routes including local, express & “Dillo” trolley – 3,300 stops – 12 Park and Rides Texas Transit Association: “Best in Texas” – 2007 “Outstanding Metropolitan Transportation System” Highest per capita ridership in Texas – 140,000+ one-way trips every day – 36 million projected total annual boardings in 2009 All Systems Go! Long Range Transit Plan Layers of service –Local Bus Service –Express Bus –Capital MetroRail –Rapid Bus –Potential Future Service Capital MetroRail Overview Downtown Plaza Saltillo MLK, Jr. Highland Mall Crestview Kramer Howard Lakeline Leander MetroRail Stations Plaza Saltillo Leander Lakeline Transit Oriented Development: Capital Metro Goals Ridership—TOD housing provides riders. TOD commercial and retail provides destinations. Revenue—Sales tax. Property tax. For land we own, development revenue. Community—TOD adds another lifestyle choice to the regional portfolio.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobilityatxfinalreport.Pdf
    WOULD LIKE TO THANK OUR PARTNERS Acknowledgements Foreword by Austin Mayor Steve Adler This process and report would not be possible without the generous support and leadership of RideScout, the Downtown Austin Alliance, Capital Metro and all MobilityATX community partners. But, most importantly, we could As Austin rapidly evolves, we must continually innovate new approaches to engage Austinites in the discussions that not do this without the Austinites who engaged to make this initiative a viable public conversation on Austin’s shape City policy. Given the participation in the MobilityATX initiative, it’s clear Austinites are anxious to contribute mobility future! their ideas for transforming mobility, and how it impacts our commutes, our economy, and our lives. Many thanks to Tocco Creative, who designed both this report as well as MobilityATX.com. A seemingly tireless web In April 2015, the MobilityATX platform was launched to engage the positive interest in Austin mobility and studio, their talent, creativity and vision knows no bounds. explore near term solutions. MobilityATX established a new conversation between Austinites, the City, and other stakeholders, to develop a new, shared perspective on of our foremost challenges. This report would not be possible without the help and keen editorial eye of Grace Atkins. We greatly appreciate the feedback and ideas contributed by Central Texans throughout the MobilityATX process, A special thanks also goes to Brian Kelsey and Nathan Brigmon of Civic Analytics for their expertise and the creation and they will no doubt contribute to the conversation about the future of Austin transportation and community of easy-to-read maps and simple explanations for exceedingly complex issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Austin System Map G 1L N
    Leander Leander Park & Ride 983 986 987 183 S o u t h B e l l Bl vd 983 986 987 214 214 ne Blvd testo 1431 Whi r D n e re 214 rg e v E Main 214 St 1431 La ke li ne 214 B lv 983 Jonestown d Park & Ride 985 214 d el R ur a L 214 Bro nc o d R Bar-K anch L R n LeanderLeander Lago Vista HS Park & Ride 183 214 183 Rd ch Lakeline an Post Office 383 214 R K Co r- yo 983 987 Northwest a te B Tr 214 383 Park & Ride P a 214 383 s P 983 985 e e o d 985 983 985 987 c R 987 a d n e P d a r r k d V o lv a B F 214 B c l Lakeline v p a to n d es k a 383 a Mall L R d m Pace Bend h North Fork o Recreation Area L Plaza (LCRA-County) 1431 383 Forest North ES WalMart 983 1431 Lakeline Plaza 985 1 Jonestown 987 TOLL Park & Ride Target Lago Vista 214 Park & Ride D 183 aw Lakeline 214 n Rd Northwest Park & Ride ek ke Cre Routes 383, 983, 985 and 987 La Pkwy continue, see inset at left. Route Finder Grisham MS M i l Westwood HS l Local Service Routes (01-99) w 1 r i TOLL Austin System Map g 1L N. Lamar/S. Congress, via Lamar S Lago Vista h ho Anderson t r 1M N.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Around in Austin
    GETTING AROUND IN AUSTIN Austin-Bergstrom International Airport (AUS) Austin-Bergstrom International Airport (ABIA) is a state-of-the-art airport with 25 gates, full customs facilities ready for the international traveler, and two parallel runways including a 12,250 foot runway. Easy to get to (only seven and a half miles from the Austin Convention Center), the airport saw an all-time passenger record of nearly 11.9 million passengers in 2015, up 11% from 2014. In operation since 1999, the airport has roughly 300 daily flights with nonstop service to 45+ destinations including international flights to London, Cancun, Guadalajara, San Jose Del Cabo and Toronto, and seasonal summer flights to Frankfurt, Germany. Austin is one of only seven airports with year-round service to all United Airlines hubs. Live music has been a distinguishing feature of the airport since its Music in the Air program launched in June 1999, just one month after the airport opened. What started as two performances per week has grown to 23 shows per week in six different venues throughout the airport: Ray Benson’s Roadhouse, the Saxon Pub, Annie’s Café & Bar, Earl Campbell’s Sports Bar, Austin City Limits/Waterloo Records & Video, and Ruta Maya. ABIA participates in the Transportation Security Administration’s (TSA) Pre-Check and Customs and Border Protection’s Global Entry program. Construction begins in 2016 on a nine-gate terminal expansion. ABIA reported 1,190 live music performances, 65.5 tons of brisket and 693,375 breakfast tacos were enjoyed by its passengers in 2015. ABIA ranked third among airports in North America for Airport Service Quality (ASQ) in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year 2010 Budget
    Approved Budget Fiscal Year 2010 October 1, 2009 – September 30, 2010 Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Approved Fiscal Year 2010 Budget This page is intentionally blank. Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Approved Fiscal Year 2010 Budget Table of Contents Page Transmittal Letter ........................................................................................................ 1 Organization of the Budget Document ........................................................................ 3 Introduction History and Service Area ...................................................................................... 5 Capital Metro Service Area Map ........................................................................... 6 Community Information & Capital Metro Involvement ........................................... 7 Benefits of Mass Transit ........................................................................................ 7 Governance........................................................................................................... 9 Management ....................................................................................................... 10 System Facility Characteristics ........................................................................... 11 Mission & Strategic Goals ................................................................................... 13 MetroRail Red Line Service Map ........................................................................ 14 Business Planning and
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Self-Evaluation Report
    Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Self-Evaluation Report Submitted to: Sunset Advisory Commission September 2009 INTRODUCTION Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Capital Metro) is pleased to provide its first Self Evaluation Report to the Texas Sunset Advisory Commission. Every effort was made to be fully responsive, however, if something was missed, please let us know and the requested information will be transmitted as soon as possible. We also encourage you to access Capital Metro’s website http://www.capmetro.org , which is also referenced in responses to some of the questions and in the request for attachments. The website is a comprehensive source of information which can facilitate gaining an understanding of the agency. Because Capital Metro is not a state agency, a number of the original questions have been modified in order to “fit” the financial or administrative nature of the Authority while still providing comparable data. For Section VI – Guide to Agency Programs, the functions or programs reflected in this report were jointly agreed upon by Capital Metro and key Sunset Advisory Committee staff. Thank you for the opportunity to participate in this process. Caroline Beyer, CPA, CISA VP, Internal Audit [email protected] Tina Bui Manager, Government Relations [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Agency Contact Information............................................................................................................... 1 II. Key Functions and Performance........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The AGE Historical Timeline
    Historic Timeline 1984 - Dell Computer Corporation is founded in Austin. 1985 - Austin Groups for the Elderly established by Austin civic leaders Bert Kruger Smith and Willie Kocurek, to expand services to older adults in the community and provide assistance in the most efficient, cooperative manner possible. 1986 - The new non-profit purchases the vacant School for the Blind Annex from the State’s General Land office; opened in 1907 as the Confederate Woman’s Home, the facility cared for more than 340 indigent women during a period of 55 years, and was a popular site that hosted many Austin community events throughout the years. 1987 - South by Southwest film, interactive, and music festivals and conferences begins. 1989 - The World Wide Web created. 1990 - Elderhaven senior day center, run by Lutheran Social Services, moves to the AGE Building. On December 10, 1990, the AGE Building mortgage is paid off. 1991 - The Cold War ends. 1994 - AGE launches the annual AGE Awards, recognizing outstanding achievements by individuals and organizations whose leadership and contributions have had a significant impact on the quality of life for aging adults and their caregivers in Central Texas. The 25th Annual AGE Awards were held on April 26, 2019, and celebrated the legacy of retired AGE Executive Director Joyce Lauck. 1996 - AGE assumes operation of Elderhaven, which was launched in 1974 as the first adult day center in Central Texas. The program continues today as the Austin Thrive Social & Wellness Center. 1998 - SeniorNet opens, teaching computer skills to adults 50 years of age and older. The program continues today as the AGE Computer Lab, offering peer-based technology classes for Central Texas adults.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Metro Rail-With-Trail Feasibility Study Downtown Austin
    Capital Metro Rail-with-Trail Feasibility Study Downtown Austin to Leander, Texas June 12, 2007 Acknowledgements Capital Metro Board of Directors BOARD OF DIRECTORS:: Lee Walker, Chairman Commissioner Margaret Gomez, Vice Chairperson Alderman Fred Harless, Secretary Council Member Lee Leffingwell Council Member Brewster McCracken Mayor Pro Tem John Trevino Mayor, City of Leander; John Cowman Board Liaison: Gina Estrada Capital Metro Staff Team Randy Hume, Commuter Rail Project Office Julie Martin, Community Involvement Team Coordinator Bill LeJeune, Rail Operations Manager Consultant Team Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc. Bowman-Melton Associates, Inc. Alta Planning + Design, Inc. BICYCLING AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES FEASIBILITY STUDY Page ii Table of Contents Executive Summary 4. Facility Design Elements I. Study Area Overview: Introduction and Background Overview Trail Tread Width Existing Conditions Choice of Surfaces Adjacent Land Uses Trail / Roadway Crossings Future Rail Operations Intersection Prototypes Synopsis of Capital Metro Safety Guidelines Trailheads Trail Amenities 2. Public Input and Project Selection Process Trail Safety and Security Facility Operations and Maintenance Public Input Alignment Evaluation Process 5. Implementation Time Line and Cost Estimates Connection Opportunities Connection Constraints and Challenges Implementation Phasing Strategy Existing Conditions Planning Level Unit Cost Estimates Evaluation Criteria Potential Funding Potential Project Benefits Appendices 3. Recommended Plan A. Opportunities and Constraints Maps System Overview B. Trail Alignments Alternatives Evaluation Matrix Development Strategies C. Tables of Estimates of Potential Costs by Section Type Recommended Projects in Priority Order D. Detailed Project Layouts – South through North Needed Rights-of-Way E. Estimated Potential Project Costs BICYCLING AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES FEASIBILITY STUDY Page iii Executive Summary placeholders for future trail connections when that plan is adopted and advances toward more expedited implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMUTER RAIL Commuter Rail Is Passenger Rail Service That Is Designed to Transport Large Volumes of Passengers Over Long Distances in a Fast and Comfortable Manner
    TRANSIT STRATEGIES COMMUTER RAIL Commuter rail is passenger rail service that is designed to transport large volumes of passengers over long distances in a fast and comfortable manner. The primary market for commuter rail service is usually commuters to and from city centers. However, many commuter rail lines also provide regional and all day service. The major benefits of commuter rail service are: è Comfortable and fast service, often faster than driving è Easy to understand and use è Efficient way to transport large volumes of people MINNEAPOLIS NORTHSTAR NASHVILLE MUSIC CITY STAR Common elements of commuter rail service include: § Vehicles: Most American commuter rail trains consist of a locomotive and multiple passenger cars, but some consist of multiple self-propelled cars. Most American commuter rail systems are diesel-powers, but a few are electric-powered. § Length: Most commuter rail lines are designed to serve long distance travel, and lines that range from 20 to 50 miles are most common. § Station Spacing: To provide competitive travel times, stations are spaced widely apart, typically every three to five miles, and often longer. § Access and Station Facilities: Most commuter rail stations rely heavily on park and ride access, and thus most include parking, and many facilities can be very large. Other station facilities include platforms, and depending upon boarding volumes, either simple shelters or enclosed waiting areas. They also commonly include other elements such as real-time passenger information, ticket vending, and bicycle parking. § Capacity: Commuter rail coaches can be either single or double level. Single level coaches can seat up to 125 passengers and bi-levels coaches can seat up to 185 passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Connect by District
    PROJECT CONNECT BY DISTRICT WHAT IS PROJECT CONNECT? ABOUT FUNDING Project Connect is a comprehensive transit plan On July 27 the CapMetro Board and City with a rail system that travels under downtown Council unanimously adopted resolutions to designed to improve on-time performance. It support the Initial Investment recommendation would also provide expanded bus service with an of $7.1 billion, including $300 million total for all-electric bus fleet. transit-related anti-displacement strategies. On August 7, both the CapMetro and City Council adopted resolutions that outlined how ABOUT “INITIAL INVESTMENT” the Initial Investment would be funded. AND “SYSTEM PLAN” CapMetro will pursue 45% federal funding The System Plan includes all elements of of this $7.1 billion, with a local match for the the transportation expansion plan that was remaining funding that would come through adopted by the Capital Metro board and a voter-approved tax rate election for Project received a resolution of approval from the Connect. The Initial Investment scenario would Austin City Council on June 10. also allow for future funding at a federal, state and local level as well as through public- The Initial Investment was adopted by the private partnerships. Capital Metro board and received a resolution of approval from the Austin City Council on July 27. The Initial Investment includes the PROJECT CONNECT AND portions of the System Plan to be advanced ANTI-DISPLACEMENT for development through proposed local and federal funding. Project Connect funding includes
    [Show full text]