CANADA VOLUME 135 S NUMBER 086 S 1st SESSION S 36th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Thursday, April 2, 1998 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire'' at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 5675 HOUSE OF COMMONS Thursday, April 2, 1998 The House met at 10 a.m. D (1010) _______________ COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE TRANSPORT Prayers Mr. Roy Cullen (Etobicoke North, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I have _______________ the honour to present, in both official languages, the third report of the Standing Committee on Transport on Bill C-15, an Act to amend the Canada Shipping Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts. ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS [English] PUBLIC ACCOUNTS D (1005) Mr. Ivan Grose (Oshawa, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I have the honour [English] to present in both official languages the seventh report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts. The report is in relation FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE to the Public Accounts of Canada, 1996-97. Pursuant to Standing Order 109 of the House of Commons, the committee requests the Hon. Lloyd Axworthy (Minister of Foreign Affairs, Lib.): Mr. government to table a comprehensive response to this report. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 109 I have the honour to present to the House in both official languages the government’s Mr. Philip Mayfield (Cariboo—Chilcotin, Ref.): Mr. Speaker, response to the report of the Subcommittee on Sustainable Human all of the opposition parties, the Reform, the Bloc Quebecois, the Development of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and Progressive Conservatives and the New Democratic Party, have International Trade entitled ‘‘Ending Child Labour Exploitation: A unanimously agreed to present a dissenting opinion to this report. Canadian Agenda for Action on Global Challenges’’. The fact that all four opposition parties agreed to this dissenting [Translation] opinion says a lot about the difference of opinion on this issue existing between the opposition and government members of the On behalf of the government, in particular the Minister of committee. We are all concerned with the government’s failure to International Co-operation and the Minister of Labour, I would like follow what are standard accounting procedures. We also feel that to express my appreciation for the work the standing committee has the government should take every step possible to avoid receiving put into producing such a detailed report and into ensuring that another qualified opinion from Parliament’s watchdog, the auditor abolition of the exploitation of child labour remains a priority for general, on its latest budget. us all. FISHERIES AND OCEANS * * * Mr. George S. Baker (Gander—Grand Falls, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, it is my pleasure to present the second report from the GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO PETITIONS Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans. This is a unanimous report by all committee members. It is a tribute to the excellent job Mr. Peter Adams (Parliamentary Secretary to Leader of the done by MPs from all parties, as well as the clerk of the committee, Government in the House of Commons, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, Mr. William Farrell and the research branch of the Library of pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), I have the honour to table, in Parliament in the person of Mr. Alan Nixon. I wish to table this both official languages, the government’s response to 12 petitions. report in both official languages. 5676 COMMONS DEBATES April 2, 1998 Government Orders JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS country so that all Canadians can have an opportunity to express their opinions on it. Ms. Shaughnessy Cohen (Windsor—St. Clair, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to present in both official languages the HERBAL SUPPLEMENTS seventh report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights. Pursuant to the order of reference of Wednesday, February Mr. Philip Mayfield (Cariboo—Chilcotin, Ref.): Mr. Speaker, 11, 1998 your committee has considered Bill S-5, an act to amend the second two petitions are also from the citizens of Quesnel. the Canada Evidence Act and the Criminal Code in respect of There are 50 signatures on each petition. The petitioners request persons with disabilities, to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act that parliament deny the right of any board or group to remove or in respect of persons with disabilities and other matters and to confiscate natural herbal supplements until public hearings are held make consequential amendments to other acts. across the country. Your committee has agreed to report it with amendments. In doing so I would like to thank witnesses who appeared before the * * * committee, my colleagues on the committee and of course our [Translation] clerical and research staff who were very helpful. QUESTIONS PASSED AS ORDERS FOR RETURNS * * * Mr. Peter Adams(Parliamentary Secretary to Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, if PETITIONS question No. 73 could be made an order for return, that return CRIMINAL CODE would be tabled immediately. The Acting Speaker (Mr. McLelland): Agreed? Mr. David Chatters (Athabasca, Ref.): Mr. Speaker, I have two petitions to present on behalf of my constituents in and around the Some hon. members: Agreed. Athabasca area. These petitions are two more in a series of [Text] petitions presented by myself and other members asking the House to reconsider the provocation defence in the Criminal Code. The Question No. 73—Mr. Peter MacKay: petitioners believe that the provocation defence unjustly changes With respect to the Canada-Nova Scotia Infrastructure Works program: (a) what the focus of the criminal trial from the behaviour of the accused projects have been approved under this program since June 2, 1997; (b) what was the and his or her intention to murder, to the behaviour of the victim. location of each approved project; and (c) what was the financial contribution made Certainly I concur with the petitioners. by the Government of Canada for each approved project? Return tabled. CRTC [Translation] Mr. Peter Goldring (Edmonton East, Ref.): Mr. Speaker, I rise in this Chamber as the humble servant of the constituents of Mr. Peter Adams: Mr. Speaker, I ask that the remaining Edmonton East. I am pleased to discharge my duties today by questions be allowed to stand. presenting to this House a petition which is signed by over 700 The Deputy Speaker (Mr. McLelland): Agreed? persons. Some hon. members: Agreed. D (1015) _____________________________________________ The petitioners ask for a very prudent review of the mandate of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commis- sion to discourage the propagation of pornography and to encour- GOVERNMENT ORDERS age the broadcasting of ecclesiastical programming that supports morality and wholesome family lifestyles. [Translation] The petitioners ask this House to heed their words and I concur. INCOME TAX AMENDMENTS ACT, 1997 MULTILATERAL AGREEMENT ON INVESTMENT The House resumed from March 26 consideration of the motion Mr. Philip Mayfield (Cariboo—Chilcotin, Ref.): Mr. Speaker, that Bill C-28, an act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax I am pleased to present petitions from the citizens of Quesnel in the Application Rules, the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, the Canada constituency of Cariboo—Chilcotin. Pension Plan, the Children’s Special Allowances Act, the Compa- nies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, the Cultural Property Export and The first petition has 50 signatures. The petitioners request that Import Act, the Customs Act, the Customs Tariff, the Employment parliament impose a moratorium on ratification of the MAI until Insurance Act, the Excise Tax Act, the Federal-Provincial Fiscal full public hearings on the proposed treaty are held across the Arrangements Act, the Income Tax Conventions Interpretation Act, April 2, 1998 COMMONS DEBATES 5677 Government Orders the Old Age Security Act, the Tax Court of Canada Act, the Tax Management of health, social programs, education and social Rebate Discounting Act, the Unemployment Insurance Act, the assistance comes under provincial jurisdiction. Normally, the Western Grain Transition Payments Act and certain Acts related to government should transfer their share back to the provinces the Income Tax Act, be read the third time and passed; and of the instead of interfering in an area that is not under its jurisdiction. amendment. The government does not seem to realize that no one has waited Mrs. Pauline Picard (Drummond, BQ): Mr. Speaker, I am for it to take action. What the provinces need today is not more pleased to speak again to the bill before us today, Bill C-28. talks but the financial means to implement solutions designed to meet their needs. There are a number of things wrong with this bill. There are the measures that supposedly demonstrate the government’s concern In this respect, I would like to quote from the Quebec finance with respect to social programs and the deterioration of health care, minister’s last budget speech, which sums up well the mess the which it brought about itself by cutting provincial transfer pay- federal government has left the provinces, and Quebec in particu- ments in the health, social services and education sectors over the lar: last three years. Since we took power in 1994, the federal government has unilaterally deprived us of $7 billion for health care, $3 billion for education, and $1 billion for asocial This bill is an attempt to make us think the government has assistance. This adds up to $11 billion. The figure does not include the $2 billion that invested in social programs, especially health. The reality is that Ottawa has refused to pay for the harmonization of the QST and the GST, although the three Atlantic Provinces were granted $1 billion. the government has put no new money into transfers, particularly not for health.