Contribution of Regional Transport to Surface Ozone at an Island Site of Eastern China
Supplementary material
Contribution of regional transport to surface ozone at an island site of eastern China
Lei Tong1, 2, , Jingjing Zhang1, 2, 3, , Honghui Xu4, Hang Xiao1, 2, , Mengmeng He1, 2, Huiling Zhang5
1 Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen, China 2 Key Lab of Urban Environmental Processes and Pollution Control, Ningbo Urban Environment Observation and Research Station-NUEORS, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, China 3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China 4 Zhejiang Institute of Meteorological Sciences, Hangzhou, China 5 Ningbo Urban Planning and Geographic Information Center, Ningbo, China
The two authors contributed equally to this paper. Corresponding author. Tel: 86-574-8678-4813; Fax: 86-574-8678-4813 E-mail address: [email protected]
Figure Captions
Fig. S1. Locations of the 26 cities in the YRD.
Fig. S2. Locations of the upwind cities for case studies of O3 pollution (LYG: Lianyungang; XZ:
Xuzhou; SQ: Suqian; HA: Huai’an; YC: Yancheng; YZ: Yangzhou; TAZ: Taaizhou; NT: Nantong;
ZJ: Zhenjiang; NJ: Nanjing; WX: Wuxi; CZ: Changzhou; SZ: Suzhou; SH: Shanghai; NB:
Ningbo; TZ: Taizhou; WZ: Wenzhou; NP: Nanping; ND: Ningde; FZ: Fuzhou; SM: Sanming; PT:
Pingtan; QZ: Quanzhou; LY: Longyan; XM: Xiamen; ZZ: Zhangzhou), and the emission map of
NO2 of East Asia (Mijling et al., 2015).
Fig. S3. The percent change in total spatial variance (TSV) for different number of clusters.
Fig. S4. The 72-h back trajectories (500 m AGL) at 14:00 CST on June 3, June 4, June 7 and June
8, 2014.
Fig. S5. Hourly average O3 concentrations in Jiangsu Province and Shanghai Municipality from
June 1 to June 3, 2014.
Fig. S6. Surface synoptic maps for 8:00 CST on May 9 and May 10, 2016.
Fig. S7. The 72-h back trajectories (500 m AGL) at 14:00 CST on May 9 and May 10, 2016.
Fig. S8. Hourly O3 concentrations in the cities of (a) Fujian Province (May 7 to May 9, 2016), (b) eastern Zhejiang Province from (May 7 to May 9, 2016) and (c) southern Jiangsu Province (May
8 to May 10, 2016).
Fig. S1. Locations of the 26 cities in the YRD.
Fig. S2. Locations of the upwind cities for case studies of O3 pollution (LYG: Lianyungang; XZ:
Xuzhou; SQ: Suqian; HA: Huai’an; YC: Yancheng; YZ: Yangzhou; TAZ: Taaizhou; NT: Nantong;
ZJ: Zhenjiang; NJ: Nanjing; WX: Wuxi; CZ: Changzhou; SZ: Suzhou; SH: Shanghai; NB:
Ningbo; TZ: Taizhou; WZ: Wenzhou; NP: Nanping; ND: Ningde; FZ: Fuzhou; SM: Sanming; PT:
Pingtan; QZ: Quanzhou; LY: Longyan; XM: Xiamen; ZZ: Zhangzhou), and the emission map of
NO2 of East Asia (Mijling et al., 2015).
Fig. S3. The percent change in total spatial variance (TSV) for different number of clusters.
Fig. S4. The 72-h back trajectories (500 m AGL) at 14:00 CST on June 3, June 4, June 7 and June
8, 2014.
Fig. S5. Hourly average O3 concentrations in Jiangsu Province and Shanghai Municipality from
June 1 to June 3, 2014.
Fig. S6. Surface synoptic maps for 8:00 CST on May 9 and May 10, 2016.
Fig. S7. The 72-h back trajectories (500 m AGL) at 14:00 CST on May 9 and May 10, 2016.
(a) (b)
(c)
Fig. S8. Hourly O3 concentrations in the cities of (a) Fujian Province
(May 7 to May 9, 2016), (b) eastern Zhejiang Province from (May
7 to May 9, 2016) and (c) southern Jiangsu Province (May 8 to May
10, 2016).