OPERATION DESERT STORM Arkansas Citizen Soldiers Respond to the Call

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

OPERATION DESERT STORM Arkansas Citizen Soldiers Respond to the Call Arkansas Military History Journal A Publication of the Arkansas National Guard Museum, Inc. Vol. 10 Summer 2016 No. 3 OPERATION DESERT STORM Arkansas Citizen Soldiers Respond to the Call 1 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Chairman Brigadier General Keith A. Klemmer Ex-Officio Vice Chairman Major General (Ret) Kendall Penn Ex-Officio Secretary Dr. Raymond D. Screws (Non-Voting) Ex-Officio Treasurer Colonel Damon N. Cluck Board Members Ex-Officio. Major James Holifield Ex-Officio. Captain Barry Owens At Large – Lieutenant Colonel Clement J. Papineau, Jr. At Large – Chief Master Sergeant Melvin E. McElyea At Large – Major Sharetta Glover Major Matthew Anderson (Non-Voting Consultant) Deanna Holdcraft (Non-Voting Consultant) Museum Staff Dr. Raymond D. Screws, Director/Journal Editor Erica McGraw, Museum Assistant, Journal Layout & Design Incorporated 27 June 1989 Arkansas Non-profit Corporation Cover Photograph: Post Card found in the Arkansas National Guard Museum Collection (2008.08) - Desert Storm, 21 December 1990—Operation Desert Storm. Message from the Editor My Take on Desert Storm from Afar For those of us old enough to remember the Gulf War, or Desert Storm, as many of us know it, it was a new kind of war and much of this had to do with the fact that it was televised daily 24/7 on CNN. Many of us watched and admired General Norman Schwarzkopf and General Colin Powell as they gave their daily briefings to the press. And many of us learned new phrases such as “scud missile.” But it was also the first patriotic war that many of us could remember. I was born in 1961, and my reference for a war was Vi- etnam, an extremely unpopular war that was depicted as such during the nightly evening news. When the most trusted man in America, Walter Cronkite, said America was losing in Vietnam, people believed him. Of course, World War II was a patriotic war for the United States, but it was not televised. And Korea took place in the early 1950s during the infancy of T.V., and had little media impact. And not long after the war began much of the reporting was relegated to the inside pages of many newspapers. But in the early 1990s, we could watch American fighters bombing their targets almost as soon as they happened. We said it looked like a video game. In Vietnam, we fought against communism, but most didn’t identify that with an individual, however evil Americans viewed that ideology. But in Desert Storm, our evil enemy was an individual – Saddam Hussein. And Americans could understand that fight. Finally, in the end, the war end- ed before it could become unpopular with Americans. Before we could take a second breath it was over, and during the next several months we welcomed our troops back as true heroes. WE WON! In Vietnam, many Americans viewed it as a defeat, and the fighting continued for years, and when we left in 1973, we hadn’t won. And two years later, Saigon fell to the communists and I don’t remember most Americans con- cerned enough to care. So Desert Storm was different for us. We could again feel proud of our troops, and, I think, Americans began to reevaluate our troops who fought in Vietnam and better appreciate their service to the United States. And THAT mission is still ongoing. Dr. Raymond Screws Editor/Arkansas National Guard Museum Director Message from the Chair We celebrate the 25th anniversary of Operation Desert Storm this year. We dedicate this edition of the Ar- kansas Military History Journal to the men and women who answered the call and performed with distinction and honor throughout both Operation Desert Shield, Operation Desert Storm, and follow-on operations, often called the "Gulf War." My memories of the Gulf War started with a phone call on a Saturday morning about a week prior to the 142nd Field Artillery Brigade's mobilization in November 1991. The caller was LTC William D. Wofford, my battalion commander in the 5-206th Field Artillery. He told me about the alert and stated that he had a few slots open and asked if I would like to mobilize with the brigade. I told him, "Give me a little time to think about it." Later that day, LTC Wofford called back. He wasn't calling about my deci- sion, but with instructions to be at the 2-142nd armory in Fort Smith on the following Monday, two days lat- er. By May of 1991, when the brigade redeployed, I had seen and done more that I could have ever imag- ined. I had the good fortune of being assigned as a battalion and brigade liaison officer, which ultimately led to an assignment with the British 1st Armoured Division Artillery. It was there that I met Ian Durie, the Divi- sion Artillery commander, at the onset of the Corps artillery preparatory fires, next to his Warrior track. He offered me a cup of hot tea from his canteen cup as we watched the vast array of artillery firing for the next hour. For a 26 year-old Captain from Arkansas, this was the start of a big adventure. Ian Durie would ulti- mately make Major General, then became an Anglican minister and outspoken opponent of war after retiring from the military. Reverend Durie died in a car wreck in Romania in 2005, at the age of 60. Such is the rich history borne out of our American experiences in war. BG Keith A. Klemmer Arkansas National Guard Museum Foundation Chair Table of Contents Arkansas’ Big Guns in the Gulf.......................................................................................... 6 100 Hours with Light TACFIRE ......................................................................................... 11 148th EVAC .................................................................................................................... 17 Arkansas Units Mobilized for Operation Desert Shield/Storm ........................................ 32 Welcoming Home Our Arkansas Soldiers and Airmen .................................................... 37 Featured Artifact: Howitzer Self-Propelled, M110A2 ...................................................... 40 Featured Photograph ..................................................................................................... 43 Arkansas' Big Guns in the Gulf From the Official After Action Report Records Originally Published in the Arkansas Military Journal Winter 1992 Edition Available for Review at the Arkansas National Guard Museum t 151415 Novem- all the unit equipment was COL Linch to keep the brigade ber 1990 the alert painted desert sand and rail- together as a unit and acclimate notice was re- loaded. The equipment was personnel to the harsh desert ceived that the shipped by train from the MOB environment. At this time the A142d Field Artillery Brigade, station to Houston and Galves- brigade was given the mission comprised of HHB, 1-142d ton, TX between 11-15 Decem- to provide general support rein- FA, and 2-142d FA, would be ber 1990. The brigade task or- forcing (GSR) fires to the 1st federally mobilized in sup- ganization at this time was as port of Operation Desert follows: 142d FA BDE com- Infantry Division (Mech). The Shield. On the same day COL prised of 1-142d FA (M203, brigade used what haul capaci- Charles L. Linch assumed SP); 1-158 FA (MLRS) OK ty it had to transport ammuni- command of the brigade. Six ARNG; 2-142d FA (M203, tion for other units within the days later on the 21st of No- SP); E/333 TAB vember the brigade received (AC) Ft Lewis, WA. the federal mobilization or- HHB, 142d Bde and der. There were 1140 person- the brigade quarter- nel assigned to the brigade ing party departed upon notification. Activities the MOB station for at home station included an Dhahran, Saudi ini-tial POM (preparation for Arabia from 14 to overseas movement) and a 16 January 1991 and showdown inspection of cloth- arrived during 15 to ing. On 23 November the ad- 20 January. The vance party departed for the quartering party ar- mobilization station and on the rived at King Fahad The Arkansas National Guard used T-55 Tanks near Kuwait City following day, the brigade de- International Air- close the highway that linked Kuwait City with Al Basrah, Iraq. ployed 985 personnel to the port on 15 January mobilization station, Fort Sill, at the "MGM Grand Hotel," or 1st ID DIVARTY until the Oklahoma. During the period Khobar towers, Dammam, Sau- howitzers and MLRS launchers from 25 November to 15 De- di Arabia. There was a total of arrived at port. While at FAA cember 1990 the 142d FA Bde 1481 personnel deployed from HAWG, late in the evening of 4 was validated by the mobiliza- the MOB station. This figure February, 1-142d fired a warn- tion station. The validation pro- included attached units and ing shot at a local intruder at- cess consisted of POM, NBC unit replacements received at validation testing/training, and tempting to drive into their ar- MOB station. The brigade de- individual and crew served ea. The terrorist threat level weapons qualification. The bri- parted the "MGM Grand Hotel" was high and internal security gade also received mission criti- on 29 January and arrived at was primary in importance. cal equipment which included FAA (forward assembly area) On 7 February, Cpt. John Light TACFIRE (LTACFIRE), HAWG, over 314 miles away, Brady was placed in command VINSON secure devices, FM the following day. 1-158 ar- of HHB, 142d. On the same day radio multiplexers, Metro rived at FAA HAWG on 3 Feb- the Brigade received its first MDS, EPSON laptop com- ruary. FAA HAWG was located "mail call." The lack of mail to puters, photocopy machines, approximately 10 km west of this point had been a real mo- and others. Training high- Hafar Al Batin. COL Linch rale detractor. On 13 February lights included LTAC-FIRE later cited two reasons for de- the Cape Capella arrived at port operator training and CPX, parting the MGM prior to the NBC, MDS, and unique am- and by 15 February thirteen am- port arrival of the howitzers munition characteristics train- munition carriers arrived at ing.
Recommended publications
  • Third Infantry Division (Mechanized) After Action Report Operation IRAQI FREEDOM
    For Official Use Only Third Infantry Division (Mechanized) After Action Report Operation IRAQI FREEDOM Table of Contents Chapter 1 Continuous Offensive Operations Over Extended 1 Distances Chapter 2 Full Spectrum Operations 11 Chapter 3 Mechanized Operations in Military Operations on Urban 21 Terrain (MOUT) Chapter 4 Fire Support in Offensive Operations 29 Chapter 5 Helicopter Operations in the Offense 35 Chapter 6 Embedded Media 41 Chapter 7 Reception, Staging, Onward Movement, and Integration 45 (RSOI) and Army Prepositioned Stock (APS) Chapter 8 Force Modernization/Modification Table of Organization 51 and Equipment (MTOE) Chapter 9 Intelligence 63 Chapter 10 Maneuver 83 Chapter 11 Battle Staff Planning 93 Chapter 12 Fire Support 99 Chapter 13 Aviation Operations 131 Chapter 14 Close Air Support (CAS) 137 Chapter 15 Engineer 143 Chapter 16 Air Defense 169 Chapter 17 Communications 183 Chapter 18 Logistics 197 For Official Use Only i For Official Use Only Chapter 19 Personnel Service Support (PSS) 213 Chapter 20 Combat Health Support (CHS) 221 Chapter 21 Equal Opportunity (EO) 231 Chapter 22 Unit Ministry Team (UMT) 235 Chapter 23 Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical (NBC) 239 Chapter 24 Provost Marshal (PM) 251 Chapter 25 Army Airspace Command and Control (A2C2) 259 Chapter 26 Command and Control (C2) 265 Chapter 27 Information Operations (IO) 269 Chapter 28 Civil Affairs (CA) 271 Chapter 29 Marne Visitors Bureau (MVB) 275 Chapter 30 Inspector General (IG) 279 Chapter 31 Staff Judge Advocate (SJA) 281 ii For Official Use Only For Official
    [Show full text]
  • ID-77-19A Perspectives on Military Sales to Saudi Arabia
    DOCIJMERT FESUHE 03686 - [E3004272] Pers-actfves on Military Sales to Saudi Arabia. ID-77019A: B-165731. October 26, 1977. 43 pp. + 7 appendices (7 pp.). Report to the Congress: by Robert P. Keller, Acting Ccmptroller General. Issa e Area: International Ecmomic and Hilitazy Programs (600); International. Economic and Military Program: Foreign nilitarg Sales (605). Contact: International Div. Budget Function: Internaticnal Affairs: Conduct of Foreign Affairs (152). Organixaticn concerned: Department of Defense; Department of State. Congressional Relevance:,Hor;.se Committee on International Relations: Senate Committee on Foreign Relations; Congress. Authority: Aras Brport Control Act (P.L. 94-329). Saudi hrabia is a ma-for U.S. military sales customer. The United States has assisted Saud?. Arabia in defining its defense needs, which, in the absence of an imainent threat, appear to be to protect its borders and oil fields. Through sales of construction expertise, equipment, training, and canagement, the united States is helping to develop Saudi armed forces to meet these needs. Saudi Arabia is vital to the United States for political, eCOAOEiC, and geographical reasons. Fi~diAgS/COAClUSiOAS: PrOfd fiscal year 19% through September 30, 1976, U.f. military sales agreements with Sauai Arabia totaled over $12.1 billion. Construction represents the largest part, or about 631, cf total foreign military sales to Satdi Arabia. The corps of Engineers manages military sales construction. continued invclvenent can increase U.S. inflkwnce in Saudi Arabia and provide increased oppcrtoaities tc U.S. contractors and businessmen. U.S. inVOlVemeAt iA Saudi Arabia's armed forces modernizatioc program will continue for several years and may increase in magnitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of a US Army Fratricide Incident
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable GAO Fred Thompson, U.S. Senate April 1995 OPERATION DESERT STORM Investigation of a U.S. Army Fratricide Incident GAO/OSI-95-10 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Office of Special Investigations B-260897 April 7, 1995 The Honorable Fred Thompson United States Senate Dear Senator Thompson: In response to your request, and that of former Senator James R. Sasser, this report presents the results of our investigation of events leading to a fratricide incident during the Persian Gulf War; assessment of the adequacy of U.S. Army investigations following the incident; and investigation of allegations that Army officials hindered those investigations or influenced their outcome. The incident involved engineers attached to the U.S. Army’s 1st Armored Division and elements of the U.S. Army’s 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment. One U.S. serviceman was killed; a second was wounded. We briefed U.S. Army representatives and the deceased serviceman’s immediate family on the content of our investigation. However, we did not obtain written comments from the Department of the Army on this report. As agreed with your office, unless you publicly announce the contents of this report earlier, we plan no further distribution until April 21, 1995. We will then send copies to interested congressional committees; the Secretary of Defense, and the Secretary of the Army. We will also make copies available to others upon request. If you have questions concerning this report, please call me, or Assistant Director Barbara Cart of my staff, at (202) 512-6722.
    [Show full text]
  • ARMORED VEHICLES MARKET REPORT 2019 the WORLD’S LARGEST DEDICATED ARMOURED VEHICLE CONFERENCE  #Iavevent
    presents THE WORLD’S LARGEST DEDICATED ARMOURED VEHICLE CONFERENCE @IAVehicles ARMORED VEHICLES MARKET REPORT 2019 THE WORLD’S LARGEST DEDICATED ARMOURED VEHICLE CONFERENCE #IAVEvent CONTENTS Rationale 3 Regional Developments 4 Africa 5 Europe 7 Indo-Asia Pacific 11 Middle East 14 North America 17 Latin America 18 Global Armoured Vehicle Holdings 19 Europe 20 Russia and Central Asia 24 Asia 27 North America 31 Middle East and North Africa 32 Sub-Saharan Africa 36 Latin America and Caribbean 41 International Armoured Vehicles 2019 44 2 THE WORLD’S LARGEST DEDICATED ARMOURED VEHICLE CONFERENCE #IAVEvent INTRODUCTION Within an ever changing strategic context, the market for armoured vehicles and related equipment has become even more wide- ranging. There has been a significant rise in the use of UGVs, artificial intelligence, virtual training and survivability equipment. Also, Active Protection Systems (APS) are being developed in lighter, cheaper and more accurate forms, supporting their case as a popular solution for the future battlespace. With all of the aforementioned in mind, the deployment of MBTs is still seen as a necessity by most in spite of climbing demand for light protected mobility. Ahead of International Armoured Vehicles 2019 conference, Defence IQ has compiled this market report to outline global key programmes and future requirements across all types of armoured vehicles. In January, Senior Representatives from the below countries will share their current requirements and challenges with the audience made up of over
    [Show full text]
  • ID-83-51 U.S. Assistance to the State of Israel
    REPORT BY THE Comptroller General OF THE UNITEDSTATES U.S. Assistance To The State Of Israel The major objectives of U.S. assistance to Israel include demonstrating U.S. political support for an ally and providing for the defense of Israel. Israel receives more U.S. security assistance and also more liberal terms and concessions than other countries. liowever, it continues to seek additional help because it perceives potential threats from other Middle East nations which, in some cases, alsoobtain advanced U.S. weaponry. The Congress has approved increases in the Israeli program and included more grants and forgiven loans. Even so, Israel is faced with the need to finance new military loans as well as to make payments on older outstanding loans. GAO believes the trends toward increasing assis- tance requirements, greater relaxation of restric- tions on the use of security assistance funds, and the provision of assistance under terms others may ask for will continue unless Israel can reach a peaceful settlement with its Arab neighbors. Without this, the United States is faced with ques- tions concerning the spiraling Middle East arms race, the impact of providing concessions with assistance, and the Israeli military debt situation. GAO/ID-8341 JUNE 24,1983 COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES WASHINGTON D.C. 20548 . B-207533 The Honorable Charles H. Percy Chairman, Committee on Foreign Relations United States Senate The Honorable Clement J. Zablocki Chairman, Committee on Foreign Affairs House of Representatives This report is the unclassified version of our classified report that describes the full range of security assistance to Israel and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • NSIAD-92-94 Operation Desert Storm: Early Performance Assessment of Bradley and Abrams
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on GAO Regulation, Business Opportunities, and Energy, Committee on Small Business, House of Representatives January1992 OPERATIONDESERT STORM Early Performance Assessmentof Bradley and Abrms GAONXAD-92-94 United States General Accountine Office GAO Washington, D.C. 25548 National Security and International Affairs Division B-247224 January lo,1992 The Honorable Ron Wyden Chairman, Subcommittee on Regulation, Business Opportunities, and Energy Committee on Small Business House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: In response to your request, we have developed information on the perfor- mance of the Bradley Fighting Vehicle and the Abrams tank during the Per- sian Gulf war. Specifically, you asked that we obtain information from Bradley and Abrams crews on (1) how well their systems performed during the war and whether improvements were needed, (2) what types of prob- lems the two systems experienced, and (3) how well combat support vehi- cles were able to recover or keep pace with the Bradley and the Abrams. On October 23, 199 1, we briefed your staff on the results of our work. This letter summarizes the information discussed at that meeting, and appen- dixes I through IV present more detailed information. Our report is based on information we obtained from Army troops and Army reports on the war. Army agencies are currently analyzing war data regarding weapons lethality, systems survivability, and destroyed vehicles but are not to report until a later date. When these reports are completed, additional information on the performance of these vehicles may come forth. During our review we sought information on Bradley and Abrams system performance using five parameters: l Reliability: The degree to which a vehicle is operable (that is, able to move, shoot, and communicate) for combat and the ease with which it can be maintained.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins and Development of the National Training Center, 1976-1984
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 369 659 SO 022 787 AUTHOR Chapman, Anne W. TITLE The Origins and Development of the National Training Center, 1976-1984. TRADOC Historical Monograph Series. INSTITUTION Army Training and Doctrine Command, Fort Monroe, VA. Office of the Command Historian. PUB DATE 92 NOTE 193p. PUB TYPE Historical Materials (060) Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC08 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Armed Forces; *Federal Government; Military Personnel; *Military Training; Postsecondary Education; *Simulation; Site Analysis; *Site Development; Site Selection; Skill Development; Team Training; Training Methods; Training Objectives; United States History; War IDENTIFIERS Military History; *United States National Training Center CA ABSTRACT Focusing on the development of the United States Army's National Training Center (NTC) from conceptualization and initial implementation in 1981 to the end of the first phase of development in 1984, this monograph provides a documented historical analysis of how and why the landmark event in army training was launched and examines attendant policy issues, funding, instrumentation, and training problems involved in bringing the project from conception to reality. Soldiers stationed in the continental United States trained for war at the NTC at Fort Irwin, California in a setting as close as possible to the reality of combat. Chapters 1-4 focus on the initial conceptualization, the choice of Fort Irwin, and the early problems. Descriptions of the training evaluation and instrumentation system utilized at the Center precede explanations of the NTC experience and are detailed in chapters 5 and 6. Chapter 7 presents information on the lessons learned, and chapter 8 describes the United States Air Force presence at the National Training Cente:.
    [Show full text]
  • A/60/160 General Assembly
    United Nations A/60/160 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 July 2005 English Original: English/French/Russian/ Spanish Sixtieth session Item 98 (d) of the provisional agenda* General and complete disarmament: transparency in armaments United Nations Register of Conventional Arms Report of the Secretary-General Summary The present report is the thirteenth consolidated report issued by the Secretary- General since the establishment of the Register.** It contains data and information provided by 90 Governments on exports and imports of major conventional arms covered under the Register for the calendar year 2004. The replies received are contained in sections II. Section III of the present report contains an index of the background information submitted by Governments on military holdings, procurement through national production, international transfers of small arms and light weapons and national policies. Replies received on military holdings and procurement through national production are contained in section IV. Additional information received from Governments on small arms and light weapons and national policies is available for consultation at the Department for Disarmament Affairs of the Secretariat. All relevant information on the Register is available electronically on the Department’s Register web site at http://disarmament2.un.org/cab/register.html. * A/60/150. ** The first to twelfth reports were issued under the symbols: A/48/344 and Corr.1-3 and Add.1-3; A/49/352 and Corr.1 and 2 and Add.1-4; A/50/547 and Corr.1 and Add.1-4; A/51/300 and Add.1-5; A/52/312 and Corr.1 and 2 and Add.1-4; A/53/334 and Corr.1 and 2 and Add.1 and 2; A/54/226 and Corr.1 and Add.1-6; A/55/299 and Corr.1 and Add.1-6; A/56/257 and Corr.1 and Add.1 and 2; A/57/221 and Corr.1 and 2 and Add.1-3; A/58/203 and Corr.1 and 2 and Add.1 and 2; A/59/193 and Corr.1 and 2 and Add.1 and 2.
    [Show full text]
  • History Design
    The M109 is an American 155 mm turreted self-propelled howitzer, first introduced in the early 1960s. It has been upgraded a number of times, most recently to the M109A7. The M109 family is the most common western indirect-fire support weapon of maneuver brigades of armored and mechanized infantry divisions. The M109 has a crew of six: the section chief, the driver, the gunner, the assistant gunner and two ammunition handlers. The gunner aims the cannon left or right (deflection), the assistant gunner aims the cannon up and down (quadrant). The M109A6 Paladin needs only a crew of four: the commander, driver, gunner and an ammunition loader. The British Army replaced its M109s with the AS-90. Several European armed forces have or are currently replacing older M109s with the German PzH 2000. Upgrades to the M109 were introduced by the U.S. (see variants below) and by Switzerland (KAWEST). With the cancellation of the U.S. Crusader and Non-Line-of-Sight Cannon, the M109A6 ("Paladin") will remain the principal self-propelled howitzer for the U.S. for the foreseeable future. History The M109 was the medium variant of a U.S. program to adopt a common chassis for its self-propelled artillery units. The light version, the M108 Howitzer, was phased out during the Vietnam War, but many were rebuilt as M109s. The M109 saw its combat debut in Vietnam. Israel used the M109 against Egypt in the 1973 Yom Kippur War and in the 1982 and 2006 Lebanon Wars. Iran used the M109 in the Iran–Iraq War in the 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 14 August 2017 English Original: Arabic/English/Russian/ Spanish
    United Nations A/72/331 General Assembly Distr.: General 14 August 2017 English Original: Arabic/English/Russian/ Spanish Seventy-second session Item 100 of the provisional agenda* General and complete disarmament United Nations Register of Conventional Arms Report of the Secretary-General Summary The present report, which is submitted pursuant to General Assembly resolution 71/44, contains information received from Member States on the export and import of conventional arms covered by the United Nations Register of Conventional Arms, including nil reports, as well as information on international transfers of small arms and light weapons and additional background information on military holdings and procurement through national production for the calendar year 2016. As at the date of submission of the present report, the Secretary-General had received reports from 34 Governments, and 7 Member States had replied to the questionnaire circulated by the Office for Disarmament Affairs, pursuant to paragraph 6 (a) of resolution 71/44. * A/72/150. 17-13996 (E) 070917 260917 *1713996* A/72/331 Contents Page I. Introduction ................................................................... 3 II. Information received from Governments ........................................... 4 A. Index of information submitted by Governments ................................. 4 B. Reports received from Governments on conventional arms transfers................. 5 III. Information received from Governments on military holdings and procurement through national
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Hostile Casualties in These Kinds of Wars from the Korean War to Operation Iraqi Freedom
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of Spring 2008 Non-Hostile Casualties in These Kinds of Wars from the Korean War to Operation Iraqi Freedom Hugh William Henry Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd Recommended Citation Henry, Hugh William, "Non-Hostile Casualties in These Kinds of Wars from the Korean War to Operation Iraqi Freedom" (2008). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 589. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/589 This thesis (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NON-HOSTILE CASUALTIES IN “THESE KINDS OF WARS” FROM THE KOREAN WAR TO OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM by HUGH HENRY (Under the Direction of Emerson Thomas McMullen) ABSTRACT This thesis provides a detailed study of the non-hostile deaths of the Korean War, the Vietnam War, Operation Desert Storm, and Operation Iraqi Freedom. This document examines the causes of the non-hostile deaths, from illnesses, accidents, friendly fire, and other injuries, as well as the trends in each war and the impact that these casualties exerted at the time they happened. In addition, this thesis explores the lessons the Armed Forces leaders applied between the wars in an effort to reduce non-hostile losses for the next war. INDEX WORDS: Spring 2008, Master’s Thesis, College of Graduate Studies, Hugh Henry, Master’s Degree, Georgia Southern University 1 NON-HOSTILE CASUALTIES IN “THESE KINDS OF WARS” FROM THE KOREAN WAR TO OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM by HUGH HENRY B.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gulf War Involved Complex Mixes of Forces from Two Very Different Military "Cultures"
    GW-3 The Forces Engaged October 15, 1994 Page 124 Chapter Three: The Forces Engaged - Opposing Military Cultures and The Human Element The Gulf War involved complex mixes of forces from two very different military "cultures". The first such "culture" was the military culture of Iraq: A Third World military force whose military history and combat experience was limited to civil war, ethnic struggles, and a prolonged war against Iran. Like many of the military cultures of the Third World, Iraq was authoritarian in nature and dependent on developed nations for virtually all of its military technology, tactics, and supply. While many aspects of its military culture were unique, other aspects are typical of the severe qualitative weaknesses of Third World forces, and provide important lessons as to how such forces are likely to behave in the future. The forces of the Arab states in the Coalition shared some of these weaknesses, but Saudi Arabia and Egypt had assimilated many transfers of technology and tactics that Iraq had not. The other Arab states were not aggressors or authoritarian regimes, had different styles of government, and different military histories. At the same time, the Saudi Air Force was the only Third World force to engage in the conflict approaching Western levels of technology and effectiveness. Their experience of the other Coalition Arab forces reinforce several of the lessons that Iraq's military reveals about the strengths and weaknesses of Third World forces. The second military "culture" was that of the West, led by the United States. Western military culture emphasized technology, tactical innovation, high tempos of war, maneuver, and deep strikes.
    [Show full text]