DOCSLIB.ORG

General Assembly Distr.: General 24 July 2006 English Original: Arabic/English/French/ Russian/Spanish

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
General Assembly Distr.: General 24 July 2006 English Original: Arabic/English/French/ Russian/Spanish United Nations A/61/159 General Assembly Distr.: General 24 July 2006 English Original: Arabic/English/French/ Russian/Spanish Sixty-first session Item 87 (aa) of the provisional agenda* General and complete disarmament: transparency in armaments United Nations Register of Conventional Arms Report of the Secretary-General Summary The present report is the fourteenth consolidated report issued by the Secretary- General since the establishment of the Register.** It contains data and information provided by 101 Governments on the international transfers of major conventional arms covered under the Register and/or additional background information for the calendar year 2005. Any additional replies received from Governments will be issued as addenda to the present report. The replies received are contained in section II of the present report. Section III contains an index of background information submitted by Governments on military holdings, procurement through national production, international transfers of small arms and light weapons and national policies. Replies received on military holdings and procurement through national production are contained in section IV. Information received from Governments on small arms and light weapons and national policies is available for consultation at the Department for Disarmament Affairs of the Secretariat. All relevant information on the Register is available electronically on the Department’s Register website at http://disarmament2.un.org/cab/register.html. * A/61/150. ** The first to thirteenth reports were issued under the symbols A/48/344 and Corr.1-3 and Add.1-3; A/49/352 and Corr.1 and 2 and Add.1-4; A/50/547 and Corr.1 and Add.1-4; A/51/300 and Add.1-5; A/52/312 and Corr.1 and 2 and Add.1-4; A/53/334 and Corr.1 and 2 and Add.1 and 2; A/54/226 and Corr.1 and Add.1-6; A/55/299 and Corr.1 and Add.1-6; A/56/257 and Corr.1 and Add.1 and 2; A/57/221 and Corr.1 and 2 and Add.1-3; A/58/203 and Corr.1 and 2 and Add.1 and 2; A/59/193 and Corr.1 and 2 and Add.1 and 2; A/60/160 and Corr.1 and 2 and Add.1 and 2. 06-43345 (E) 150806 *0643345* A/61/159 Contents Paragraphs Page I. Introduction ......................................................... 1–2 3 II. Information received from Governments.................................. 3–4 3 A. Composite table of replies of Governments ..................................... 4 B. Replies received from Governments ........................................... 7 III. Index of background information provided by Governments for the calendar year 2005 ..... 53 IV. Information received from Governments on military holdings and procurement through national production ............................................................. 55 2 06-43345 A/61/159 I. Introduction 1. The present report is the fourteenth consolidated report on the United Nations Register of Conventional Arms, and is submitted pursuant to General Assembly resolution 60/226 of 23 December 2005. 2. Due to the non-availability of extrabudgetary funds, the Department for Disarmament Affairs was unable to sustain its programme of regional or subregional workshops to enhance awareness of the Register and to encourage greater participation in it. Within available resources, however, the Department engaged in a number of activities related to the Register. In October 2005, on the margin of the First Committee, the Department organized and coordinated an informal meeting of delegates on issues related to the United Nations Register, including matters likely to be addressed during the 2006 review of the Register’s operation and further development. In March 2006, the Department posted a document on its website entitled “Guidelines for reporting international transfers: questions and answers”. The primary purpose of the publication is to assist States in the reporting of arms transfers to the United Nations Register. In July 2006, the Department also posted a document entitled “Tables and graphs”, which provides information on various aspects of participation by States in the United Nations Register at the global and regional levels. In addition, the Department engaged in informal consultations with Member States, with a view to encouraging and facilitating their participation in the Register. II. Information received from Governments1 3. Information received from Governments is presented below as follows: a composite table listing all the replies received by the Secretary-General (sect. A) and an index of individual replies of Governments (sect. B). Where appropriate, the relevant parts of notes verbales are reproduced. 4. The composite table is provided for ease of reference. As regards the information contained in the table, it should be noted that a “yes” denotes a submission of data regarding imports and/or exports in relation to the seven categories of arms covered by the Register during the reporting period. For the purpose of uniform tabulation, responses by Governments that contained either “nil”, “none”, “0”, a dash (-) or which otherwise indicated that no exports and/or imports in the categories covered by the Register had taken place are reflected in the tables as “nil” reports. A blank space under data on imports and/or exports in the composite table indicates that no information was provided. In some cases, however, an explanation can be found in the note verbale of the country in question, as indicated above. Only those parts of the standardized forms that contain specific data and notes verbales of Governments providing relevant information are reproduced in section B. Replies in the standardized reporting forms and the simplified “nil” reporting form or in notes verbales containing “nil” or blank reports are listed in the composite table only. __________________ 1 Documents have been reproduced as received; the designations employed do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities. 06-43345 3 A/61/159 A. Composite table of replies of Governments2 Explanation Data on Data on submitted in Background State exports imports note verbale information Albania nil nil no Andorra nil nil no Antigua and Barbuda nil nil no Armenia nil nil no Australia yes yes yes Austria nil nil yes Azerbaijan nil yes no Bangladesh nil yes no Belarus yes nil no Belgium yes nil yes Belize nil nil no Bolivia nil nil no Brazil nil yes yes Bulgaria yes yes yes Canada yes yes yes Chile no yes no Comoros nil nil no Costa Rica nil nil no Croatia nil nil yes (nil) Cuba nil nil no Cyprus nil nil no Czech Republic yes yes no Denmark nil yes yes Djibouti nil nil no Ecuador nil nil no Estonia nil yes yes Finland yes no yes Georgia nil yes no Germany yes yes yes Greece yes yes yes Guatemala nil nil no Guyana nil nil no Hungary yes nil yes Iceland nil nil yes India yes yes no Indonesia nil nil no Israel yes nil no Italy yes yes yes Jamaica nil nil no __________________ 2 Cook Islands and Niue submitted “nil” reports. 4 06-43345 A/61/159 Explanation Data on Data on submitted in Background State exports imports note verbale information Japan nil nil yes Kazakhstan nil yes no Kiribati nil nil no Kuwait nil nil yes Kyrgyzstan nil nil no Latvia nil nil no Lebanon nil nil no Lesotho nil nil no Liechtenstein nil nil no Lithuania nil yes yes Luxembourg nil nil no Maldives nil nil no Malta nil nil no Marshall Islands nil nil no Mauritius nil nil no Mexico nil nil no Micronesia nil nil no Monaco nil nil no Mongolia nil nil no Mozambique nil nil no Namibia nil nil no Nauru nil nil no Netherlands yes yes yes New Zealand nil nil yes Nicaragua nil nil no Niger nil nil no Norway yes nil no Pakistan nil yes no Palau nil nil no Paraguay nil nil no Poland yes nil yes Portugal yes yes no Republic of Korea nil yes no Republic of Moldova nil nil no Romania nil yes yes Russian Federation yes no no Saint Lucia nil nil no Samoa nil nil no San Marino nil nil no Senegal nil nil no Seychelles nil nil no Singapore nil yes no Slovenia yes yes no 06-43345 5 A/61/159 Explanation Data on Data on submitted in Background State exports imports note verbale information Solomon Islands nil nil no South Africa yes yes no Spain nil yes yes Suriname nil nil no Sweden yes nil yes Switzerland yes yes yes Tajikistan nil nil no The former Yugoslav nil nil no Republic of Macedonia Turkey yes yes yes Turkmenistan nil nil no Ukraine yes no no United Kingdom yes yes yes United Republic of Tanzania nil nil no United States of America yes yes yes Vanuatu nil nil no Viet Nam no yes no Zambia nil nil no 6 06-43345 A/61/159 B. Replies received from Governments Australia Reporting country: Australia Original language: English Calendar year: 2005 Background information provided: yes Date of submission: 28 April 2006 EXPORTS A B C D E Remarks Final State/Country Category Number Intermediate Comments on Importer of Origin (If Description of Item (I-VII) of Items location the transfer State(s) not exporter) II. USA 6 ADI Bushmaster Armoured Armoured Personnel combat Carriers vehicles Singapore 2 Tenix S600 Armoured Personnel Carriers National criteria on transfers: (iii) Transfer of title. Note: Differences in accounting procedures and definition of transfer dates may create discrepancies with figures from importer states. IMPORTS A B C D E Remarks State/Country Category Exporter Number Intermediate Comments on of Origin (If Description of Item (I-VII) State(s) of Items location the transfer not exporter) V.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Security & Defence European
    a 7.90 D European & Security ES & Defence 4/2016 International Security and Defence Journal Protected Logistic Vehicles ISSN 1617-7983 • www.euro-sd.com • Naval Propulsion South Africa‘s Defence Exports Navies and shipbuilders are shifting to hybrid The South African defence industry has a remarkable breadth of capa- and integrated electric concepts. bilities and an even more remarkable depth in certain technologies. August 2016 Jamie Shea: NATO‘s Warsaw Summit Politics · Armed Forces · Procurement · Technology The backbone of every strong troop. Mercedes-Benz Defence Vehicles. When your mission is clear. When there’s no road for miles around. And when you need to give all you’ve got, your equipment needs to be the best. At times like these, we’re right by your side. Mercedes-Benz Defence Vehicles: armoured, highly capable off-road and logistics vehicles with payloads ranging from 0.5 to 110 t. Mobilising safety and efficiency: www.mercedes-benz.com/defence-vehicles Editorial EU Put to the Test What had long been regarded as inconceiv- The second main argument of the Brexit able became a reality on the morning of 23 campaigners was less about a “democratic June 2016. The British voted to leave the sense of citizenship” than of material self- European Union. The majority that voted for interest. Despite all the exception rulings "Brexit", at just over 52 percent, was slim, granted, the United Kingdom is among and a great deal smaller than the 67 percent the net contribution payers in the EU. This who voted to stay in the then EEC in 1975, money, it was suggested, could be put to but ignoring the majority vote is impossible.
    [Show full text]
  • Missiles OUTLOOK
    SPECIFICATIONS Missiles OUTLOOK/ GENERAL DATA AIRFRAME GUIDANCE OUTLOOK/ POWERPLANT SPECIFICATIONS MAX. MAX. SPAN, BODY LAUNCH MAX. RANGE STATUS/OUTLOOK/REMARKS DESIGNATION/NAME LENGTH WINGS OR DIAMETER WEIGHT CONTRACTOR TYPE NO. MAKE & MODEL (FT.) FINS (FT.) (FT.) (LB.) (NAUT. MI.) AIR-TO-AIR CHUNG-SHAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (CSIST), Taoyuan, Taiwan Skysword 1 (Tien Chien 1) 9.8 2.1 0.42 196.4 — IR 1 X solid propellant 9.7 In service with Taiwan air force since 1993. Skysword 2 (Tien Chien 2) 11.8 2 0.62 396.8 — Active radar 1 X solid propellant 32.4 In service with Taiwan air force since 1996. DENEL (PTY.) LTD., Pretoria, South Africa OPERATORS SATELLITE A-Darter 9.8 1.6 0.54 195.8 Denel IIR 1 X solid propellant — Fifth-generation technology demonstrator. Likely co-development with Brazil. COMMERCIAL R-Darter 11.9 2.1 0.53 264 Denel Radar 1 X solid propellant — Development completed 2000. For South African Air Force Cheetah and Gripen aircraft. U-Darter 9.6 1.67 0.42 210 Denel Two-color, IR 1 X solid propellant — First revealed in 1988; similar to Magic. Entered production in 1994. In use on South African Air Force Cheetah and Impala aircraft. DIEHL BGT DEFENSE, Uberlingen, Germany COMMERCIAL AIM-9L/I-1 Sidewinder 9.4 2.1 0.4 189 Diehl BGT Defense IR 1 X solid propellant — Upgraded and refurbished. IRIS-T 9.7 — 0.4 196 Diehl BGT Defense IIR 1 X solid propellant — In production. SATELLITE OPERATORS SATELLITE MBDA MISSILE SYSTEMS (BAE Systems, EADS, Finmeccanica), London, UK; Vélizy, France; Rome, Italy Aspide 12.1 3.4 0.67 479 Alenia Semiactive radar, homing 1 X solid propellant 43 In service.
    [Show full text]
  • Cranfield University
    CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY LEIGH MOODY SENSORS, SENSOR MEASUREMENT FUSION AND MISSILE TRAJECTORY OPTIMISATION COLLEGE OF DEFENCE TECHNOLOGY PhD THESIS CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF DEFENCE TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF AEROSPACE, POWER AND SENSORS PhD THESIS Academic Year 2002 - 2003 Leigh Moody Sensors, Measurement Fusion and Missile Trajectory Optimisation Supervisor: Professor B.A. White July 2003 Leigh Moody asserts his right to be identified as the author. © Cranfield University 2003 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of Cranfield University and without acknowledging that it may contain copyright material owned by MBDA UK Limited. i ii ABSTRACT When considering advances in “smart” weapons it is clear that air-launched systems have adopted an integrated approach to meet rigorous requirements, whereas air-defence systems have not. The demands on sensors, state observation, missile guidance, and simulation for air-defence is the subject of this research. Historical reviews for each topic, justification of favoured techniques and algorithms are provided, using a nomenclature developed to unify these disciplines. Sensors selected for their enduring impact on future systems are described and simulation models provided. Complex internal systems are reduced to simpler models capable of replicating dominant features, particularly those that adversely effect state observers. Of the state observer architectures considered, a distributed system comprising ground based target and own-missile tracking, data up-link, and on-board missile measurement and track fusion is the natural choice for air-defence. An IMM is used to process radar measurements, combining the estimates from filters with different target dynamics. The remote missile state observer combines up-linked target tracks and missile plots with IMU and seeker data to provide optimal guidance information.
    [Show full text]
  • Romanian 1980S TO&Es V1.2
    Romanian 1980s TO&Es v1.2 BATTLEGROUP CWRO-01 Romanian Tank Division 1980s (a) BATTLEGROUP CWRO-05 x3 Tank Regiment ARMY TROOPS BATTLEGROUP CWRO-06 FIRE SUPPORT ELEMENT CWRO-06 x1 Motor Rifle Regiment Up to x1 Artillery Brigade FIRE SUPPORT ELEMENT CWRO-01 x1 Artillery Regiment x1 Engineer Brigade (d) BATTLEGROUP CWRO-07 BATTLEGROUP CWRO-08 x1 Self-Propelled Gun Regiment (b) x1 Reconnaissance Battalion (e) BATTLEGROUP CWRO-08 MANOEUVRE ELEMENT CWRO-14 x1 Reconnaissance Battalion (e) Up to x3 SAM Battery (c) x1 Engineer Battalion (f) MANOEUVRE ELEMENT CWRO-13 Up to x6 Army Antiaircraft Battery (c) MANOEUVRE ELEMENT CWRO-14 FRONT TROOPS x3 SAM Battery (c) MANOEUVRE ELEMENT CWRO-14 Up to x3 SAM Battery (c) MANOEUVRE ELEMENT CWRO-12 x6 Divisional Antiaircraft Battery (c) MANOEUVRE ELEMENT CWRO-13 (a) The Romanian Army formed the Warsaw Pact’s ‘Danube Front’, Up to x6 Front Antiaircraft Battery (c) comprising four Romanian Armies numbered 1st to 4th. All elements of the Danube Front were 100% Romanian. Romania had steered a course of stubborn independence from Moscow BATTLEGROUP CWRO-07 following the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968 and did not Up to x5 Antitank Regiment (bg) allow transit by Soviet units, nor did it participate in Warsaw Pact exercises. Romania was therefore at the absolute back of the x2 Mi-4 ‘Hound’ Transport Helicopter (h) CWWP-117 queue for Soviet weapons technology, though it had an active domestic arms industry, producing various home-grown weapons systems, as well as Soviet, Yugoslav and even French designs x12 Mi-8 ‘Hip’ Transport Helicopter (hi) CWWP-118 under licence.
    [Show full text]
  • ISSUE 5 AADH05 OFC+Spine.Indd 1 the Mortar Company
    ARTILLERY AND AIR DEFENCE ARTILLERY ISSUE 5 HANDBOOK HANDBOOK – ISSUE 5 PUBLISHED MARCH 2018 THE CONCISE GLOBAL INDUSTRY GUIDE ARTILLERY AND AIR DEFENCE AADH05_OFC+spine.indd 1 3/16/2018 10:18:59 AM The Mortar Company. CONFRAG® CONTROLS – THE NEW HIGH EXPLOSIVE STANDARD HDS has developed CONFRAG® technology to increase the lethal performance of the stan- dard High Explosive granade for 60 mm CDO, 60 mm, 81 mm and 120 mm dramatically. The HE lethality is increased by controlling fragmentation mass and quantity, fragment velocity and fragment distribution, all controlled by CONFRAG® technology. hds.hirtenberger.com AADH05_IFC_Hirtenberger.indd 2 3/16/2018 9:58:03 AM CONTENTS Editor 3 Introduction Tony Skinner. [email protected] Grant Turnbull, Editor of Land Warfare International magazine, welcomes readers to Reference Editors Issue 5 of Shephard Media’s Artillery and Air Defence Handbook. Ben Brook. [email protected] 4 Self-propelled howitzers Karima Thibou. [email protected] A guide to self-propelled artillery systems that are under development, in production or being substantially modernised. Commercial Manager Peter Rawlins [email protected] 29 Towed howitzers Details of towed artillery systems that are under development, in production or Production and Circulation Manager David Hurst. being substantially modernised. [email protected] 42 Self-propelled mortars Production Elaine Effard, Georgina Kerridge Specifications for self-propelled mortar systems that are under development, in Georgina Smith, Adam Wakeling. production or being substantially modernised. Chairman Nick Prest 53 Towed mortars Descriptions of towed heavy mortar systems that are under development, in CEO Darren Lake production or being substantially modernised.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 31 July 2001 English Original: Arabic/English/French/ Russian/Spanish
    United Nations A/56/257 General Assembly Distr.: General 31 July 2001 English Original: Arabic/English/French/ Russian/Spanish Fifty-sixth session Item 85 (s) of the provisional agenda* General and complete disarmament: transparency in armaments United Nations Register of Conventional Arms Report of the Secretary-General** Contents Paragraphs Page I. Introduction .......................................................... 1–10 2 II. Information received from Governments................................... 11–12 4 A. Composite table of replies of Governments ...................................... 5 B. Replies received from Governments ............................................ 8 III. Index of background information provided by Governments for the calendar year 2000 ...... 60 IV. Information received from Governments on military holdings and procurement through national production .............................................................. 63 Annex Views received from Governments in accordance with paragraph 5 (a) of General Assembly resolution 55/33 U .............................................................. 103 * A/56/150. ** Finalization of the present report was dependent on the receipt of a substantial number of submissions by Governments. 01-49573 (E) 200901 *0149573* A/56/257 I. Introduction 1. In accordance with General Assembly resolution 46/36 L of 9 December 1991, on transparency in armaments, the Secretary-General, on 1 January 1992, established the United Nations Register of Conventional Arms. In that resolution, the
    [Show full text]
  • Heroics & Ros Index
    MBW - ARMOURED RAIL CAR Page 6 Error! Reference source not found. Page 3 HEROICS & ROS WINTER 2009 CATALOGUE Napoleonic American Civil War Page 11 Page 12 INDEX Land , Naval & Aerial Wargames Rules 1 Books 1 Trafalgar 1/300 transfers 1 HEROICS & ROS 1/300TH SCALE W.W.1 Aircraft 1 W.W.1 Figures and Vehicles 4 W.W.2 Aircraft 2 W.W.2. Tanks &Figures 4 W.W.2 Trains 6 Attack & Landing Craft 6 SAMURAI Page11 Modern Aircraft 3 Modern Tanks & Figures 7 NEW KINGDOM EGYPTIANS, Napoleonic, Ancient Figures 11 HITTITES AND Dark Ages, Medieval, Wars of the Roses, SEA PEOPLES Renaissance, Samurai, Marlburian, Page 11 English Civil War, Seven Years War, A.C.W, Franco-Prussian War and Colonial Figures 12 th Revo 1/300 full colour Flags 12 VIJAYANTA MBT Page 7 SWA103 SAAB J 21 Page 4 World War 2 Page 4 PRICE Mk 1 MOTHER Page 4 £1.00 Heroics and Ros 3, CASTLE WAY, FELTHAM, MIDDLESEX TW13 7NW www.heroicsandros.co.uk Welcome to the new home of Heroics and Ros models. Over the next few weeks we will be aiming to consolidate our position using the familiar listings and web site. However, during 2010 we will be bringing forward some exciting new developments both in the form of our web site and a modest expansion in our range of 1/300 scale vehicles. For those wargamers who have in the past purchased their Heroics and Ros models along with their Navwar 1/300 ships, and Naismith and Roundway 15mm figures, these ranges are of course still available direct from Navwar www.navwar.co.uk as before, though they will no longer be carrying the Heroics range.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Infantry Division (Mechanized) After Action Report Operation IRAQI FREEDOM
    For Official Use Only Third Infantry Division (Mechanized) After Action Report Operation IRAQI FREEDOM Table of Contents Chapter 1 Continuous Offensive Operations Over Extended 1 Distances Chapter 2 Full Spectrum Operations 11 Chapter 3 Mechanized Operations in Military Operations on Urban 21 Terrain (MOUT) Chapter 4 Fire Support in Offensive Operations 29 Chapter 5 Helicopter Operations in the Offense 35 Chapter 6 Embedded Media 41 Chapter 7 Reception, Staging, Onward Movement, and Integration 45 (RSOI) and Army Prepositioned Stock (APS) Chapter 8 Force Modernization/Modification Table of Organization 51 and Equipment (MTOE) Chapter 9 Intelligence 63 Chapter 10 Maneuver 83 Chapter 11 Battle Staff Planning 93 Chapter 12 Fire Support 99 Chapter 13 Aviation Operations 131 Chapter 14 Close Air Support (CAS) 137 Chapter 15 Engineer 143 Chapter 16 Air Defense 169 Chapter 17 Communications 183 Chapter 18 Logistics 197 For Official Use Only i For Official Use Only Chapter 19 Personnel Service Support (PSS) 213 Chapter 20 Combat Health Support (CHS) 221 Chapter 21 Equal Opportunity (EO) 231 Chapter 22 Unit Ministry Team (UMT) 235 Chapter 23 Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical (NBC) 239 Chapter 24 Provost Marshal (PM) 251 Chapter 25 Army Airspace Command and Control (A2C2) 259 Chapter 26 Command and Control (C2) 265 Chapter 27 Information Operations (IO) 269 Chapter 28 Civil Affairs (CA) 271 Chapter 29 Marne Visitors Bureau (MVB) 275 Chapter 30 Inspector General (IG) 279 Chapter 31 Staff Judge Advocate (SJA) 281 ii For Official Use Only For Official
    [Show full text]
  • Ein Kanonenjagdpanzer Entsteht - Der Kajapa Von Revell Im Maßstab 1:35
    Revell: Im Bau: Ein Kanonenjagdpanzer entsteht - Der KaJaPa von Revell im Maßstab 1:35 Beitrag von „Fritz Schmitz“ vom 29. März 2015, 22:17 Ich lade alle ein, mich in meinem neuen Baubericht (BB) zum Bau des Kanonenjagdpanzer im Maßstab 1:35 zu begleiten! Bitte denkt daran, dass ich nicht die besten Fotos machen kann. Alle Fotos im Baubericht: © Fritz Schmitz und privat Hier einige Infos zum Kanonenjagdpanzer: Der KaJaPa (KANONENJAGDPANZER) Der Kanonenjagdpanzer 4–5, auch Jagdpanzer Kanone 90 mm, Kanonenjagdpanzer, KaJaPa oder KanJPz war der zweite Jagdpanzer der deutschen Bundeswehr, aber der erste und einzige mit Rohrbewaffnung. Hintergrund: Nach dem Krieg setzte die Bundeswehr auf eine „bewegliche Verteidigung“, die unter anderem den Einsatz von Panzerjägern vorsah. Diese sollten die Infanterie bei der Abwehr feindlicher Panzer unterstützen. Dazu beschaffte die Bundeswehr ab 1961 den Raketenjagdpanzer 1 und dann ab 1966 den Kanonenjagdpanzer 4–5, der bis 1968 die in den Panzerjägerkompanien und den Panzerjägerzügen der Panzergrenadierbataillone eingesetzten US-amerikanischen Modelle M41, M47 und M48 ablöste. Entwicklung: Die Entwicklung des Kanonenjagdpanzers begann 1960 und gründete sich auf den Erfahrungen der Wehrmacht im Zweiten Weltkrieg – der Kanonenjagdpanzer stellte eine Weiterentwicklung des Jagdpanzers IV dar. Der Auftrag zur Fertigung wurde den Rüstungsunternehmen Henschel und Ruhrstahl (später Rheinstahl-Hanomag) erteilt, die jeweils zwölf Prototypen fertigten, die sich nur in der Anzahl der Laufrollen unterschieden. Henschel favorisierte bei seinem HK 3/1 Prototyp sechs Laufrollen je Seite, wogegen Rheinstahl-Hanomag beim Prototyp RU 332 auf fünf Laufrollen setzte. Nach umfangreichen Truppenversuchen durch das deutsche Heer war die Erprobung im Jahr 1963 abgeschlossen und es wurde die Version des Rüstungskonzern Rheinstahl-Hanomag ausgewählt.
    [Show full text]
  • Armored Infantry Fighting Vehicle
    SUMMARY AIFV Type : Armored Infantry Fighting Vehicle ARMORED INFANTRY FIGHTING VEHICLE Place of origin : United States Specifications : Dimensions : ● Weight : combat load 13.6 tons / empty 11.4 ton ● Length : 5.26 m ● Width : 2.82 m The AIFV is a tracked light armored ● Height : hull top front 1.85 m / rear 2.00 m vehicle that serves as an infantry fight- turret roof 2.79 m ing vehicle in several countries. It’s an ● Ground clearance : 0.432 m improved M113A1 armoured personnel carrier with 85% identical spare parts. Crew : 3+7 Armour : aluminium hull (40 mm) with spaced laminate steel armor on front and sides Main armament : 25 mm KBA-B02 cannon with ● Munition : 180 rounds ready; 144 in reserve ● Rate of fire : 50 rounds/min ● Muzzle velocities : 1.100 – 1.360 m/sec (depending ammo type) POWER PACK ● Firing height : 2.33 m GM Detroit Diesel 6V53 Turbo engine ● Recoil force : 2.500 kg Allison TX100-1A transmission Secondary armament : 7.62x51mm NATO Machine gun (not installed) ● Munition : 230 rounds ready; 1610 in reserve. MAX SPEED Smoke-laying equipment : 6 smoke grenade launchers mounted on the turret ● road 61.2 km/h Power pack : ● water 6.3 km/h ● Engine : GM Detroit Diesel 6V53 Turbo engine model 5063-5396 V-type watercooled engine ACCELERATION producing 265 hp at 2800 rpm 0 to 32 km/h in 10 sec ● Transmission : Allison TX100-1A transmission SUSPENSION ● Power/Weight Ratio : 19.29 hp/ton high strength torsion bars Max speed : road 61.2 km/h / water 6.3 km/h Acceleration : 0 to 32 km/h in 10 sec FUEL CAPACITY Suspension : High strength torsion bars 416 litres - range : 490 km Fuel capacity : 416 litres - range : 490 km Steering : mechanically controlled differential and pivot STEERING steering mechanically controlled differential and pivot steering Current operators : Bahrein 75, Chile (+169), Egypt (+1000), Jordan (500), Lebanon (16), Morocco (110), Malaysia (322), Philippines (71), Turkey EWS-ENCLOSED WEAPON STATION (+2000), United Arab Emirates (133) ● 25mm KBA-B02 cannon ● 7.26x51mm Nato machine gun FLANDERS TECHNICAL SUPPLY NV - SYLLAB SA J.
    [Show full text]
  • Mg 34 and Mg 42 Machine Guns
    MG 34 AND MG 42 MACHINE GUNS CHRIS MC NAB © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com MG 34 AND MG 42 MACHINE GUNS CHRIS McNAB Series Editor Martin Pegler © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 DEVELOPMENT 8 The ‘universal’ machine gun USE 27 Flexible firepower IMPACT 62 ‘Hitler’s buzzsaw’ CONCLUSION 74 GLOSSARY 77 BIBLIOGRAPHY & FURTHER READING 78 INDEX 80 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com INTRODUCTION Although in war all enemy weapons are potential sources of fear, some seem to have a deeper grip on the imagination than others. The AK-47, for example, is actually no more lethal than most other small arms in its class, but popular notoriety and Hollywood representations tend to credit it with superior power and lethality. Similarly, the bayonet actually killed relatively few men in World War I, but the sheer thought of an enraged foe bearing down on you with more than 30cm of sharpened steel was the stuff of nightmares to both sides. In some cases, however, fear has been perfectly justified. During both world wars, for example, artillery caused between 59 and 80 per cent of all casualties (depending on your source), and hence took a justifiable top slot in surveys of most feared tools of violence. The subjects of this book – the MG 34 and MG 42, plus derivatives – are interesting case studies within the scale of soldiers’ fears. Regarding the latter weapon, a US wartime information movie once declared that the gun’s ‘bark was worse than its bite’, no doubt a well-intentioned comment intended to reduce mounting concern among US troops about the firepower of this astonishing gun.
    [Show full text]
  • THE REVIVAL of the AERONAUTICS MILITARY INDUSTRY at the TIME of the COMMUNIST STATE
    ROMANIAN MILITARY THINKING THE REVIVAL OF THE AERONAUTICS MILITARY INDUSTRY AT THE TIME OF THE COMMUNIST STATE. WHEN, HOW AND WHY WAS THE DECISION MADE? Sorin TURTURICĂ Curator, the Romanian Aviation Museum After Nicolae Ceaușescu became the head of the Romanian Communist State, a full-scale industrialisation programme was launched within the military sphere, programme that exceeded the settlements within the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance. For the military aviation, the plans were very ambitious. The Romanians decided to equip their air regiments with jet, transport or training aircraft, as well as helicopters, all made exclusively within Romania. A surplus designed for export purposes was also planned for. In order to achieve this vast programme, it was intended to buy foreign licenses as well as to develop some original projects. Keywords: military aviation, Soviet troops, Mirage, aeronautics industry, the USSR. No. 3/2018 166 The Revival of the Aeronautics Military Industry at the Time of the Communist State. When, How and Why Was the Decision Made? Introduction Equipping the military aviation with domestically built aircraft was not a new idea in the first years of the Socialist Republic. In the interwar period, the governments in Bucharest had also the same objective. For this reason, the I.A.R. plants were erected in Brașov, which would build, for the next two decades, seven types of engines and 24 types of aircraft1, and some smaller industrial plants, like S.E.T. and I.C.A.R., also received orders from the military. In the years In the years of the Second World War, the military aviation of the Second was equipped, to a great extent, with Romanian made aircraft.
    [Show full text]