PREVENT AIRSPACE INFRINGEMENTS Their Money’S Worth

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Preventing airspace infringements AirspaceAVOID – free assistance in preventing airspace infringements When in doubt you can also inquire with Amsterdam Planning Information or Dutch MIL Info. On request of the Dutch easy to determine whether or not Download and use • Use the most recent maps available. They will prove government and GA sector a specific NOTAM will impact your NLAA is very similar to the popular PREVENT AIRSPACE INFRINGEMENTS their money’s worth. During flight parties, the PocketFMS Foundation flight. The NOTAMs in NLAA are EasyVFR app, a product from the • Your electronic maps / databases should be current • Use a mode S transponder, have developed the Netherlands close to real-time, due to a direct PocketFMS Foundation as well. as well. • Call Flight Information: that is what they are for! AirspaceAVOID application (“NLAA”). link with Eurocontrol. Easily applied NLAA however is free to download • Prepare your flight thoroughly, including the latest • Under Schiphol and Rotterdam TMAs: Its purpose is twofold: to reduce filters keep you in control; NOTAMs and use for all users of the Dutch weather info, read the NOTAMs and avoid taking Amsterdam Information 124.300, amount and severity of airspace you mark as irrelevant can be airspace. It can be downloaded in risks. Have a ‘bad weather route’. • In MIL airspace: Dutch MIL Info 132.350, infringements, and to make NOTAM hidden permanently. This makes the Google Play Store and Apple’s • Plan together with another pilot, and hone your • Inside the Rotterdam TMAs: Rotterdam Approach information easier to digest. The for a compact briefing consisting AppStore – no registration is planning and navigation skills frequently. 127.025 app is aimed towards all users of of only flight relevant NOTAMs. A required. For more information, • Consider alternative routes, and be aware of where • Where possible, avoid flying very close to the the Dutch airspace, and can be NOTAM push function ensures you please visit www.airspaceavoid.nl they will lead you. boundary of any controlled airspace. downloaded at no cost for your can receive NOTAM updates for the • You cannot expect to receive a CTR crossing • On approaching a CTR: contact ATC. iPhone, iPad and Android devices. region you selected, even when clearance at all times! Have a backup plan. • Contact ATC whenever you have problems the NLAA app isn’t active on your • Share your experiences in your flight club. concerning navigation, transponder settings, when AeroData device at the time. • Know your limitations, especially when you are you are uncertain of your position or when you are The NLAA airspace database somewhat low on current hours. in distress. is updated free of charge. The information is updated every 28 Tips for flights around Amsterdam and Rotterdam Useful links days as part of the AIRAC cycle. In Contact Amsterdam Information (124.300), when Airspace Infringements -Skybrary flight, the position of your aircraft flying underneath the Schiphol TMA 1 or Rotterdam www.skybrary.aero/index.php/Airspace_Infringement is clearly indicated in relation to TMAs. the airspace that surrounds you, • You will always receive the latest QNH, Air Safety Institute - AOPA making you a better informed and • FIC will alert in case of distress or missing, www.aopa.org/Pilot-Resources/Air-Safety-Institute more aware pilot. You also know • FIC will provide traffic information on other known which ground based station you traffic, Fly On Track - NATS UK should call at your local position, • FIC can provide you with information on active flyontrack.co.uk including the proper frequency. areas, weather conditions and glider activity. With a single tap on the moving Airspace Infringement Initiative - Eurocontrol map you can see in detail all of Contact Rotterdam Approach (127.025). For flights www.eurocontrol.int/articles/airspace-infringement- the relevant information on an within the Rotterdam TMAs (Class E) you will receive initiative airspace, such as its type, class, flight information on other known traffic. lateral and vertical dimensions as Link for reporting incidents and accidents well as contact information. For crossing CTRs and TMAs / special use airspace www.ilent.nl/onderwerpen/transport/luchtvaart/ Contact the responsible ATC unit; you will need ATC ilt_en_luchtvaart/analysebureau_luchtvaartvoorval- NOTAMs clearance. Operating hours of MIL CTRs and special len__abl/ You can also display the current use airspaces are found in the AIP and NOTAMs. NOTAMs on the map, making it Airspace Infringements Leaflet – edition 1, spring 2016 What is an airspace infringement? Who causes the majority of infringements? CTR Schiphol Approaching Schiphol traffic for runway 27 is found Airspace infringements are incidents in which General aviation traffic is responsible for over 87% of Because of the high traffic density near Schiphol here at 2000 feet. an aircraft enters a controlled airspace without airspace infringements. This is usually traffic operating airport, infringements in the CTR will almost permission. They primarily occur in the vicinity of visually in uncontrolled airspace (class G). Radio immediately pose a threat to flight safety. - South side of Schiphol, below the approach route to the control areas of Amsterdam, Eindhoven and communications are not mandatory in this class of These infringements are often the result of an the Kaagbaan (06) and Aalsmeerbaan (36R). Maastricht airports and in areas where restrictions airspace, which increases the odds of unintentional incorrect lateral position, caused by the lack of apply. penetration of controlled or restricted airspace. current documentation detailing the Schiphol CTR Maastricht Aachen Airport The graph below shows the division of the number boundaries, or of insufficient pilot attention during The airspace surrounding Maastricht Aachen airport Causes of airspace infringements: of infringements by type of aircraft for the year VFR navigation. is complex due to the unique shape of the southern • Incorrect interpretation of the airspace / chart / 2015. It shows that powered aircraft, helicopters, Netherlands state border. It is therefore not fully location, (powered) gliders, free balloons and drones (RPAS) are TMA Schiphol Alongside the Schiphol CTR boundary, the most unexpected that this region is prone to a significant • Insufficient pilot awareness, responsible for the majority of infringements The majority of airspace infringements involve common choke points are: number of infringements. • Distraction, situations where the pilot unknowingly enters the - On the north side: the Noordzeekanaal is a significant • Complexity of the airspace / chart / region, Infringements per 2015 per aircraft type Schiphol TMA. The lower limit for the Schiphol TMA VFR landmark. However, the major part of that TMA Maastricht • Insufficient flight preparation, Type�luchtvaartuig�[291] 1 is 1500 feet. Traffic in the TMA can be at 2000 feet, channel resides inside the Schiphol CTR. In the Maastricht airspace, you will encounter a wide 5% 3% 4% • Incorrect interpretation or use of navigational aids. 2% particularly in the close vicinity of the airport itself, diversity of aircraft types (MIL, gliders, free balloons, 1% where 2000 feet is the default approach altitude for - Along the coastline: a lot of VFR operations take helicopters, parapenters and even unmanned Airplane arriving Schiphol traffic. place here, all of which can potentially conflict with aircraft), all of which on occasion enter controlled CTR Eindhoven Helicopter approaching Schiphol traffic flying towards runway airspace without permission. In the southeast, most Infringements for the Eindhoven CTR are commonly What is the importance of preventing airspace 18% (motor)glider 18R at 2000 feet. infringements occur by aircraft taking shortcuts. North located near the towns of Valkenswaard, Boxtel infringements? balloon RPAS of the CTR, unauthorized traversing of controlled and Bladel. In particular the region near Bladel is The effects of an infringement can be quite diverse, Paraglider - East side near Pampus and VRP Victor: intense VFR airspace occurs by flights between Belgium and considered critical, as it is positioned on the extended and in the worst of cases lead to a midair collision. 67% OnbekendUnknown traffic from and to Lelystad and Hilversum airports. Germany. Causes are often incorrectly set QNH values, Eindhoven runway centerline. Possible effects, increasing in magnitude, are: where in the southern part (vicinity Eijsden) and in the southwest, causes primarily seem to be navigational CTR Niederrhein Where do the majority of infringements errors. In the Dutch part of the Niederrhein CTR (Germany), a lot of infringements are made as well. The German occur? CTR Maastricht Air Safety Office has voiced its concerns on these Most infringements take place inside a Terminal Particularly north and south of the CTR there is a infringements in the Dutch segment of this CTR. Manoeuvring Area (TMA, 42%), followed by a Control considerable chance of conflicts with approaching A recurring pattern emerges: pilots follow the outline Zone surrounding an airport (CTR, 38%). traffic for runways 03 or 21. Approaching traffic in that of the Volkel and de Peel CTR contours closely and The remainder largely consists of special use airspace region will typically be at 2000 feet or lower. wind up in the Niederrhein CTR, which extends from such as Restricted, Danger or Prohibited Areas. ground up to 3000 feet. Inadvertently they cross
Recommended publications
  • EHAM — AMSTERDAM/Schiphol

    EHAM — AMSTERDAM/Schiphol

    AIP NETHERLANDS AD 2.EHAM-1 04 FEB 2016 EHAM — AMSTERDAM/Schiphol EHAM AD 2.1 AERODROME LOCATION INDICATOR AND NAME EHAM — AMSTERDAM/Schiphol EHAM AD 2.2 AERODROME GEOGRAPHICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE DATA 1 ARP co-ordinates and site at AD 52°18'29"N 004°45'51"E 062 DEG GEO 135 m from TWR. 2 Direction and distance from (city) 4.9 NM SW of Amsterdam. 3 Elevation/reference temperature -11 ft AMSL/20.4°C (JUL). 4 Geoid undulation at AD ELEV PSN 142 ft. 5 MAG VAR/annual change 0°E (2010)/8'E. 6 AD operator, postal address, telephone, telefax, Post: Amsterdam Airport Schiphol email, AFS, website P.O. Box 7501 1118 ZG Schiphol-Centre Tel: +31 (0)20 601 9111 (Airport all EXT) +31 (0)20 601 2116 (Airport office/Apron Management Service) +31 (0)20 601 2115 (Airport Authority) Fax: +31 (0)20 604 1475 AFS: EHAMYDYX 7 Types of traffic permitted (IFR/VFR) IFR/VFR 8 Remarks 1. Airport for use by national and international civil air transport with all types of aircraft. 2. Upon request, contact the airside operations manager (AOM) on channel 130.480 call sign "Airport One" (not monitored H24). 3. Changes in the availability of the runway and taxiway infrastructure at the airport will be promulgated by NOTAM. The NOTAM can refer to the website http://www.eham.aero where visual material relating to this subject will be shown. This material may only be used in combination with the current NOTAM. EHAM AD 2.3 OPERATIONAL HOURS 1 AD operator H24 2 Customs and immigration H24 3 Health and sanitation H24 4 AIS briefing office H24 self-briefing Tel: +31 (0)20 406 2315 +31 (0)20 406 2316 Fax: +31 (0)20 648 4417 5 ATS reporting office (ARO) H24 Tel: +31 (0)20 406 2315 +31 (0)20 406 2316 +31 (0)20 406 2323 Fax: +31 (0)20 648 4417 6 MET briefing office H24 7 ATS H24 8 Fuelling Schiphol-Centre: H24.
  • Countywide Airspace Usage

    Countywide Airspace Usage

    A PPENDIX I Countywide Airspace Usage Riverside County is within one of the busiest and most complex sections of airspace in the United States, handling over 4.3 million operations annually. To better understand the magnitude of these op- erations and complexities of this system, Map 1 depicts Instrument Flight Rule (IFR) operations for the six busiest airports in the area for a 24-hour period on January 26, 1996. This exhibit does not depict operations from the 14 airports in Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan update. AIRSPACE STRUCTURE Since the advent of aviation, nations have established procedures within their boundaries to regulate the use of airspace. Airspace is broadly classified as either “controlled” or “uncontrolled” in the United States. The difference between the two categories relates primarily to requirements for pilot qualifica- tions, ground-to-air communications, navigation and traffic services, and weather conditions. Six classes of airspace have been designated in the United States. Airspace designated as Class A, B, C, D, or E is considered controlled airspace. Aircraft operating within controlled airspace are subject to vary- ing requirements for positive air traffic control. The airspace in Riverside County, as illustrated on Map 2, is constantly occupied by aircraft arriving and departing from other airports in the region. Frequently, overflights experienced in communities near Riverside County airports are not the result of operations at nearby airports, but from aircraft us- ing airports outside Riverside County. After the preparation of this plan, additional approaches have been established for aircraft arriving at Los Angeles International Airport. These new approaches were not included as part of the map development process for this plan.
  • Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules of the Air (SERA)

    Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules of the Air (SERA)

    Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules of the Air (SERA) EASA eRules: aviation rules for the 21st century Rules and regulations are the core of the European Union civil aviation system. The aim of the EASA eRules project is to make them accessible in an efficient and reliable way to stakeholders. EASA eRules will be a comprehensive, single system for the drafting, sharing and storing of rules. It will be the single source for all aviation safety rules applicable to European airspace users. It will offer easy (online) access to all rules and regulations as well as new and innovative applications such as rulemaking process automation, stakeholder consultation, cross-referencing, and comparison with ICAO and third countries’ standards. To achieve these ambitious objectives, the EASA eRules project is structured in ten modules to cover all aviation rules and innovative functionalities. The EASA eRules system is developed and implemented in close cooperation with Member States and aviation industry to ensure that all its capabilities are relevant and effective. Published December 20201 1 The published date represents the date when the consolidated version of the document was generated. Powered by EASA eRules Page 2 of 213| Dec 2020 Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules Disclaimer of the Air (SERA) DISCLAIMER This version is issued by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) in order to provide its stakeholders with an updated and easy-to-read publication. It has been prepared by putting together the officially published regulations with the related acceptable means of compliance and guidance material (including the amendments) adopted so far.
  • Icao Definitions Flight Procedures Icao Rules Of

    Icao Definitions Flight Procedures Icao Rules Of

    22 AUG08 AIRTRAFFICCONTROL 1 INTRODUCTION This AirTrafficControlSectionisdesignedtoprovide pilots with InternationalCivil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Standards, Recommended Practicesand P rocedures forinternational operations.Inaddition, on astate-by-statebasis,flightproceduresuniquetoeachstate,ordifferent from thepublishedICAOrules andprocedures, areincluded. Each part of this AirTraffic ControlSection is describedbelow. ICAODEFINITIONS durespage.Ifthe state hasexceptions to thepub- Thesedefinitions areapplicable to theICAOinfor- lishedholding tables, acomplete tabulation of hold- mation contained in this ATCsection andhavebeen ing speeds is provided. extractedfromappropriateICAOpublications. PROCEDURE LIMITATIONS AND OPTIONS FLIGHT PROCEDURES Statementsconcerning conformance with ICAO Details of thePANS-OPS instrumentdepartureand PANS-OPS areincludedhere. The latestversion approach procedure informationusefultothe pilot-in- of PANS-OPS,VolumeIis provided in theICAO commandinthe execution of an instrument departure Flight Procedures chapter. Thestatement “Instru- or approach procedureare included. Theinformation ment Procedures areinconformancewith thenew is extractedfromthe latestamended edition of Pro- PANS-OPS Document8168,VolumeII” indicates ceduresfor AirNavigation Services—Aircraft Oper- compliance with this document. ations, Document 8168, VolumeI,FlightProcedures. Procedurelimitations, non-standard circling pro- References to earliereditionsare included. tectedarea, airspeedrestrictions, andsimilartype informationisincluded.Significantstatedifferences
  • Appendix 2 ORDER of PRIORITY for AIRSPACE USE

    Appendix 2 ORDER of PRIORITY for AIRSPACE USE

    Appendix 2 ORDER OF PRIORITY FOR AIRSPACE USE The order of priority described in this Appendix is based on advance notification procedures at the pre-tactical level of ASM in adherence to the FUA concept. Approved Agencies (AA) are authorised to submit advance notifications to the AMC. Airspace reservations can also be made without an advance notification at the tactical level, but in that case the reserved areas will have no priority over other airspace structures or air traffic. This document specifies the permanent order of priority for airspace use. Traficom may issue a decision concerning temporary reorganisation of priorities through the strategic level planning and negotiation process. The following flights always take priority over all other air traffic and airspace structures: - an aircraft in an emergency; - an aircraft avoiding a weather phenomenon dangerous to flights; - quick reaction alert flights (QRA missions); - flights conducted under an Open Skies agreement; - flights designated with STS indicators MEDEVAC/SAR/HEAD. The following order of priority shall be observed between various airspace structures and air traffic: 1 TSA – TMA At the pre-tactical level, a TMA takes priority over TSAs. A TSA may be given priority over a TMA through the strategic level planning and negotiation process. At the tactical level, the TMA holder may release airspace for a TSA, in which case the TMZ requirement and services specific to the airspace class may also be waived. 2 TSA – FIZ At the pre-tactical level, the FIZ takes priority over TSAs. A TSA may be given priority over a FIZ through the strategic level planning and negotiation process.
  • FAA Airspace Classifications

    FAA Airspace Classifications

    United States Main article: Airspace class (United States) The U.S. adopted a slightly modified version of the ICAO system on September 16 , 1993 , when regions of airspace designated according to older classifications were converted wholesale. The exceptions are some Terminal Radar Service Areas (TRSA), which have special rules and still exist in a few places. • With some exceptions, Class A airspace is applied to all airspace between 18,000 feet(5,500 m) and Flight Level 600 (approximately 60,000 ft). Above FL600, the airspace reverts to Class E (Reference Order 7400.9P, Subpart E). The transition altitude (see Flight level ) is also consistently 18,000 feet (5,500 m). All operations in US Class A airspace must be conducted under IFR. SVFR flight in Class A airspace is prohibited. • Class B airspace is used around major airports , in a funnel shape that is designed to contain arriving and departing commercial air traffic operating under IFR, up to10,000 feet (3,000 m) above MSL (12,000 feet above Denver, Colorado ). Class C airspace is used around airports and military air bases with a moderate traffic level. Class • Class D is used for smaller airports that have a control tower. The U.S. uses a modified version of the ICAO class C and D airspace, where only radio contact with ATC rather than an ATC clearance is required for VFR operations. • Other controlled airspace is designated as Class E - this includes a large part of the lower airspace. Class E airspace exists in many forms. It can serve as a surface-based extension to Class D airspace to accommodate IFR approach/departure procedure areas.
  • Information to VFR Pilots Information to VFR Pilots

    Information to VFR Pilots Information to VFR Pilots

    Information to VFR pilots Information to VFR pilots This publication has been prepared by Airspace Class G Airspace Class D Naviair with the purpose of focusing In general, the airspace in Denmark, All CTRs and some TMAs in Denmark, on flight safety and clarifies topics, outside CTRs and TMAs, is Airspace e.g. Aarhus, Rønne, Aalborg, Karup which are important to know for VFR Class G from GND to 3500 feet. and Skrydstrup are Airspace Class D. pilots, to prevent airspace penetration Both IFR and VFR traffic are permitted. of controlled airspace. Over the North Sea it is Airspace Class G from GND to FL195. Airspace Class D is controlled airspace and ATC Clearance is required. Airspace Classes Both IFR and VFR traffic are permitted. Airspace Class G is uncontrolled VFR traffic receives traffic information In Denmark the airspace below FL195 airspace and therefore both IFR and about other traffic, IFR included. is divided into four different airspace VFR traffic only receive FIS, includ- classes, namely Airspace Class C, D, E ing traffic information about other There is no requirement for transpon- and G, with Airspace Class C being the known traffic. der, but two-way radio communicati- most restrictive airspace and Airspace on is required. Class G the least restrictive. There is no requirement for two-way radio communication or transponder for VFR flights. Note however, that Airspace Class C when flying in TIZs and TIAs two-way Billund TMA and Copenhagen Area, radio communication is mandatory, which consists of Roskilde and Ka- even though they are Airspace Class G.
  • London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-Establish Controlled Airspace in the Vicinity of LSA

    London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-Establish Controlled Airspace in the Vicinity of LSA

    London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Airspace Change Proposal Management in Confidence London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Document information London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Document title Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Authors LSA Airspace Development Team and Cyrrus Ltd London Southend Airport Southend Airport Company Ltd Southend Airport Produced by Southend on Sea Essex SS2 6YF Produced for London Southend Airport X London Southend Airport T: X Contact F: X E: X Version Issue 1.0 Copy Number 1 of 3 Date of release 29 May 2014 Document reference CL-4835-ACP-136 Issue 1.0 Change History Record Change Issue Date Details Reference Draft A Initial draft for comment Draft B Initial comments incorporated – Further reviews Draft C 23 May 2014 Airspace Development Team final comments Final 27 May 2014 Final Review Draft D Issue 1.0 29 May 2014 Initial Issue CL-4835-ACP-136 Issue 1.0 London Southend Airport 1 of 165 Management in Confidence London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Controlled Copy Distribution Copy Number Ownership 1. UK Civil Aviation Authority – Safety and Airspace Regulation Group 2. London Southend Airport 3. Cyrrus Ltd Document Approval Name and Organisation Position Date signature X London Southend X 27 May 2014 Airport London Southend X X 27 May 2014 Airport London Southend X X 29 May 2014 Airport COPYRIGHT © 2014 Cyrrus Limited This document and the information contained therein is the property Cyrrus Limited.
  • STS UAS Operations Within Close Proximity and Above an Object

    STS UAS Operations Within Close Proximity and Above an Object

    Standard Scenario (STS) UAS OPERATIONS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY AND ABOVE AN OBJECT WITHIN AND OVER CONGESTED AREAS Inspectie Leefomgeving en Transport - CAA The Netherlands Version 1.4 - December 2018 Table of contents Introduction 3 Glossary of Terms 4 ConOps; introduction 8 Conops; General Conditions 9 Operator Requirements 11 General 11 Operations Manual and Procedures 15 Crew Qualification 20 Other specifics 21 Application for Authorization 22 STS-CAA-NL-CLOSEPROX-V1.4 !2 Introduction In order to avoid time consuming appraisals of repetitive individual approvals, CAA-NL applies the methodology to define “Standard Scenarios” for a growing number of identified types of ConOps with known threats and acceptable risk mitigations. Standard Scenarios limit the administrative burden for both UAS operators and the authorities and stimulates innovation by lowering the entry level for certain types of operation. A standard scenario includes a declaration that shall be signed by the operator’s accountable manager and submitted to the authorities. By submitting the declaration the operator indicates the covered operation will be conducted in accordance with the indicated general conditions and that all mitigation measures are in place and verified. This methodology is in line with all known elements of upcoming EU drone legislation. Some underlying elements of this legislation and associated guidance material are still under construction. Therefore, until further notice, all operators wishing to conduct the operation covered by this standard scenario in The Netherlands, also need to obtain the specific approval of CAA-NL by applying for extension of the privileges under their RPAS Operators Certificate (ROC). Dutch ROC-holders may send their applications for authorisations to [email protected].
  • Appendix D National Airspace System

    Appendix D National Airspace System

    APPENDIX D NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM Rocky Mountain Metropolitan Airport Airport Master Plan Update APPENDIX D. NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM The national airspace system consists of a network of navigational aids and a number of air traffic control facilities designed to operate in conjunction with the various defined classes of airspace. These classes are subdivided into controlled, uncontrolled, special use, and other airspace categories. D.1 CONTROLLED AIRSPACE Controlled airspace includes all airspace categorized as either Class A, Class B, Class C, Class D, or Class E airspace. While operating in controlled airspace pilots are subject to certain operating rules as well as pilot qualification and aircraft equipment requirements. In accordance with each airspace classification, ATC service is provided to aircraft operating under instrument flight rules (IFR) and visual flight rules (VFR). D.1.1 Class A Airspace Class A airspace includes the airspace over the United States and the airspace overlying the waters within 12 nautical miles of the coast of the 48 contiguous states, from 18,000 feet mean sea level (MSL) up to and including 60,000 feet MSL, also known as flight level 600 (FL600). Appendix D D - 1 Final Rocky Mountain Metropolitan Airport Airport Master Plan Update The Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) requires all persons operating an aircraft in Class A airspace to be flying under IFR. Operations in Class A airspace can only be conducted under an air traffic control (ATC) clearance received prior to entering the airspace and each aircraft must be equipped with a two-way radio capable of communicating with ATC on an assigned frequency and an operating transponder.
  • Ops Info for Ento and Torp Ctr

    Ops Info for Ento and Torp Ctr

    FLYSIKRING AS TORP KONTROLLTÅRN OPS INFO FOR ENTO AND TORP CTR VERSION HISTORY Version Date References Description 1.0 2014-09-15 First edition 1.1 2015-01-13 Chapter 2.1 Classification of Torp CTR based on new BSL F 1-1 (SERA) 1.2 2015-08-20 Chapter 2.3 New RNAV (GNSS) approach procedures for both runways 1.3 2015-12-01 Chapters Revised restrictions based on new noise abatement 1.11 and 2.7 procedures with effect from 2015-12-01. 1.4 2016-10-01 Chapter 2.7 Revised noise abatement procedures for aircraft with certified noise level below 72dB(A) 2.0 2018-09-13 Updates related to AIRAC 13 SEP 2018, incl. introduction of ILS CAT II for RWY18. Modified design of holding point on TWY W3. Naming of Main Apron taxiway TANGO. 2.1 2018-09-24 Chapter 1.6 New map Main Apron 2.2 2019-06-29 Chapter 1.7 New map GA Apron, including revised operational procedures GENERAL This document contains data which is relevant for all types of aviation related operations at Sandefjord Airport Torp (ENTO) and in the airspace surrounding the airport (Torp control zone/CTR). This includes operations with manned and unmanned aircraft, aerial sporting activities and model aircraft. The information provided is either additional or supplemental to information included in Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP) Norway, refer the following internet page. The information is divided into two chapters: 1. Airport 2. Airspace Chapter 1 contains descriptions of activities, regulations and limitations at ENTO. Chapter 2 contains descriptions of activities, regulations and limitations in Torp CTR, including: • Operations at ENTO, incl.
  • Airspace Management Operations Manual Procedures for Flexible Use of Airspace

    Airspace Management Operations Manual Procedures for Flexible Use of Airspace

    Airspace Management Operations Manual Procedures for Flexible Use of Airspace Approved by Finnish Transport and Communications Agency (Traficom) and Air Force Command Valid from: 25.4.2019 until further notice CONTENTS: DOCUMENT HISTORY .................................................................................................... 4 abbreviations .................................................................................................................. 5 DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................................. 8 1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................... 11 2 GENERAL ............................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Description and purpose of the ASM Operations Manual ....................... 12 3 AIRSPACE ORGANISATION ................................................................................ 13 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 13 3.2 FIR .................................................................................................................... 13 3.2.1 Airspace over international waters ......................................................... 13 3.2.2 ATS-delegated areas in the EFIN FIR ..................................................... 14 3.3 CTA ..................................................................................................................