DOCSLIB.ORG

The Securitisation of Hizb Ut Tahrir a Comparative Case Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Securitisation of Hizb ut Tahrir A Comparative Case Study A Thesis Submitted to Royal Holloway, University of London in fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in International Relations Submitted by Nomaan Hanif Department of Politics and International Relations University of London 2014 1 Declaration of Authorship I ……………………. hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: ______________________ Date: ________________________ 2 Abstract Hizb ut Tahrir (HT) is a rapidly growing trans-national Islamic movement which aims to revive the classical Islamic Caliphate. Consequently, it has come under increasing international focus as a result of its rapid expansion beyond its traditional heartland of the Middle East into Central Asia, South Asia and Europe, in turn eliciting diverse reactions from governments, ranging from it being constructed as a threat to the state, to its political acceptance and even protection. This study evaluates the discrepancy in this treatment under diverse political contexts. It argues that differing government responses to HT are premised on subjective political and security considerations, and not on the objective reality of HT’s political programme and history of activism. HT specifies the area in which the Caliphate is to be revived (the majaal, or location of power) as the Arab Middle East. HT maintains that Arab-speaking societies must be the basis of a revived Caliphate because of the inseparable link that exists between Islam and the Arabic language. HT therefore does not constitute an existential threat to states ruling over non-Arab speaking Muslim societies. HT’s political programme and history of attempted coup d’états attests to its challenge to states in the Arab Middle East; but no such precedent exists outside of that region. This thesis provides an explanation for the government responses to HT outside the Middle East through the theory of securitisation and the securitisation model developed by the Copenhagen 3 School. This model looks at the construction of security as a subjective phenomenon, primarily through the medium of the ‘speech act’ which is designed to convince audiences to accept the mobilisation of ‘special measures’ in order to deal with constructed threats. In support of this argument the study provides a series of comparative case studies of HT under differing political contexts which includes the Arab Middle East, Uzbekistan, Indonesia and the UK. 4 Table of Contents Chapter 1: Hizb ut Tahrir: Issues Concerning its Securitisation 12 1.1 Political Islam: Islamism and Neo Fundamentalism 13 1.2 Why is Hizb ut Tahrir Unique? 15 1.3 Studies on Hizb ut Tahrir 20 1.4 Existing Research Gaps 22 1.5 Hypothesis and Methodology 24 1.51 Primary Sources and Analytical Tools 26 1.52 Secondary Sources 27 1.6 Case Studies 30 1.7 Theoretical Issues: The Securitization Model of the Copenhagen School 34 1.8 Critique of the Securitization Model 41 1.81 Limitations of the Speech Act 43 1.82 Conditions for Successful Securitization 45 1.9 Organization of the Thesis 47 Chapter 2: Origins, Ideology and Strategy of Non-Violent Revolution 49 2.1 Classical Tools, Modern Ideology 49 2.2 Qualifications of Usool (foundations of Jurisprudence) 53 2.3 The Objective: Reviving the Transnational Role of Khilafah 57 2.4 The Theory of Change: Reviving Islam as a Political Ideology 69 2.5 The Strategy for Change: Mobilising Political Detachment 76 5 2.6 Action towards Change: Sixfold Agenda 81 2.7 The Process of Change: Nusrah and Non-Violent Transfer of Power 86 Conclusion 88 Chapter 3: The Majaal: Understanding and Locating the Existential Threat 90 3.1 Defining the Majaal – Linking Ideology with Geography 94 3.2 Hizb ut Tahrir as an Existential Threat 111 2.21 Destabilizing the Society and System 111 2.22 Targeting Power 122 3.3 The New Security Environment in the Post Arab Spring 2011 132 3.4 Hamas and the Paradox of Hizb ut Tahrir’s Securitization 135 Conclusion 142 Chapter 4: Manufacturing the Threat of Hizb ut Tahrir in Uzbekistan 143 4.1 Uzbekistan Hizb ut Tahrir Strategy 147 4.2 Misreading Hizb ut Tahrir’s Objectives in Uzbekistan 149 4.3 Islam Karimov and the Securitization of Political Islam 153 4.4 Emergency Measures Against Hizb ut Tahrir 157 4.5 Efforts to Securitize Hizb ut Tahrir as a Terrorist Movement 163 4.6 The Question of Akromiya and Domestic Academics as Securitizing Actors 175 4.7 The Securitizing Influence of Western Actors on Hizb ut Tahrir in Uzbekistan 181 Conclusion 195 6 Chapter 5: Societal Security and Hizb ut Tahrir in Indonesia 197 5.1 The Origins and Development of Hizb ut Tahrir in Indonesia 201 5.2 Seeking Legitimacy, Avoiding Securitization 211 5.3 Hizb ut Tahrir Indonesia’s Conceptual Pragmatism 214 5.4 The Efforts of Civil Society Foundations to Securitize Hizb ut Tahrir Indonesia 223 Conclusion 245 Chapter 6: The Struggle to De-Securitise Hizb ut Tahrir in Britain 247 6.1 The Evolution of Hizb ut Tahrir’s Strategy in Britain 253 6.2 The Battle over Hizb ut Tahrir’s Proscription 262 6.3 Meeting the Home Office Criteria: Hizb ut Tahrir’s Response to Proscription and Securitization 282 Conclusion 310 Chapter 7: Conclusion 312 7.1 Summary of Findings 312 7.11 The Majaal 313 7.12 Non-Majaal – Muslim Countries 315 7.13 Non-Majaal – Non Muslim Countries 319 7.2 Implications of Findings 321 7.3 Limits of the Study 323 7.4 Suggestions for Future Research 324 Bibliography 327 7 Abbreviations ACPO : Association of Community Police Officers AKKBB : Aliansi Kebangsaan Kebebasan Beragama dan Keyakinan (National Alliance for Freedom of Religion and Belief) AM : Al Muhajiroun (The Emigrants) AQ : Al Qaeda BBC : British Broadcasting Corporation BDBJ : Board of Deputies of British Jews BIN : Indonesian National Intelligence Service CACI : Central Asia Caucus Institute CEIP : Carnegie Endowment for International Peace CPRI : Conflict and Peace Research Institute CS : Copenhagen School EU : European Union FCO : British Foreign and Commonwealth Office FJP : Freedom and Justice Party FOI : Freedom of Information Act FPI : Islamic Defenders‘ Front FS : British Foreign Secretary FUI : Forum Ummat Islam (Muslim Ummah Forum) FS : Foreign Secretary HO : British Home Office HS : British Home Secretary HRW : Human Rights Watch 8 HS : Home Secretary HT : Hizb ut Tahrir (Party of Liberation) HTB : Hizb ut Tahrir Britain HTI : Hizb ut Tahrir Indonesia HuN : Hizb un Nusra (Party of Influence/Power) IAF : Islamic Action Front ICSA : Islamic Supreme Council of America ICG : International Crisis Group IDF : Islamic Defenders Front IJU : Islamic Jihad Group of Uzbekistan IMU : Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan IPB : Bogor Institute for Agriculture IRP : Islamic Renaissance Party JC : Jewish Chronicle JIL : Liberal Islam Network KSICC : Kelompok Studi Islam Standard Chartered (Standard Chartered Islamic Study Circle) MEIRP : Middle East Information and Research Project MB : Muslim Brotherhood MCB : Muslim Council of Britain MAB : Muslim Association of Britain MP : Minister of Parliament MUI : Majelis Ulama Indonesia (Indonesian Ulama Council) NGO : Non Government Organization NKRI : Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia (Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia) NSA : Non State Actor NU : Nahdlatul Ulama 9 NUS : National Union of Students OSCE : Organization of Security and Cooperation in Europe OSCT : Office for Security and Counter Terrorism OSI : Open Society Institute PA : Palestinian Authority PCHR : Palestinian Centre for Human Rights PKS : Prosperous and Justice Party PLO : Palestinian Liberation Organization PM : Prime Minister QF : Quilliam Foundation SAIS : John Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies SMT : Social Movement Theory SNB : Uzbek National Security Agency ST : Sunday Telegraph UJS : Union of Jewish Students ULU : University of London Union UNHCR : United Nations Human Rights Commission US : United States WOT : War on Terror 10 List of Figures No. Titles Page 1.1 The nucleus of ideology from party to state 19 1.2 Linking the majaal and non-majaal case studies with securitization 25 1.3 Emmers spectrum of securitization 38 2.1 The expansion of Hizb ut Tahrir (1952-2000) 52 2.2 Nabhani’s usool – primary and secondary sources 54 2.3 HT’s heirachical organisational structure 73 2.4 HT’s plans for revolutionary action 84 2.5 HT’s plan of action in promoting revolutionary change 85 2.6 HT’s three stage programme of societal transformation 88 3.1 Securitization model for HT in the Middle East pre-Arab spring 92 3.2 HT’s majaal and its periphery 94 3.3 HT’s theory on the role of Arabic in the process of Islamic revival 95 3.4 Nabhani’s Theory on the complimentary characteristics of Islam and Arabic 97 3.5 HT’s criteria for the caliphate 100 3.6 HT’s conception of how the caliphate will expand 102 3.7 HT’s theory of the relationship between Islam and Arabic in decline and revival 104 3.8 HT’s correlation of its method with each stage of the Prophet’s mission 106 3.9 The criteria for leadership in orthodox Sunnism, Shiaism and the wilayat –ul-faqih 107 3.10 HT’s movement as a unit at each stage of its political programme 112 3.11 History of HT’s activism 132 4.1 The securitization of HT in Uzbekistan 147 4.2 Comparison between HT and IMU objectives in Uzbekistan 149 4.3 HT’s strategy in Uzbekistan 151 4.4 Data on HT and other political prisoners in Uzbekistan 159 5.1 The securitization of HT in Indonesia 200 6.1 The securitization of HT in the UK 252 6.2 The de-securitization of HT in the UK 252 11 Chapter 1 Hizb ut Tahrir: Issues concerning its Securitization This dissertation studies the Islamist group Hizb ut Tahrir (Party of Liberation) (HT) in the Middle East, Uzbekistan, Indonesia and the Britain.
Recommended publications
  • As Many of You Probably Heard, in April Of

    As Many of You Probably Heard, in April Of

    Sesquicentennial Lecture, University of Memphis, November 9th, 2009 “The Global War on What Exactly? Making Sense of Political Islam” Dr. James L. Gelvin, Professor of Modern Middle East History, UCLA In July of 2008, the New York Times ran an article about the evolution of the Algerian militant group, the Armed Islamic Group (GIA), into a branch of al-Qaeda called “al-Qaeda of the Islamic Maghreb.” The Armed Islamic Group emerged after the Algerian government cancelled the second round of parliamentary elections in 1992. The government did this to prevent a victory by the Islamic Salvation Front, a party led by a broad coalition of Islamic activists. The GIA was not interested in parliamentary politics: its goal was to overthrow the Algerian government by violence and establish an Islamic government in its place. According to the article, in 1994 the group was approached by Osama bin Laden who sought to establish a base in Algeria. The group refused bin Laden‟s request. In an interview obtained by the New York Times, one of the group‟s leaders stated that he told bin Laden, “We don‟t have anything to do with anything outside….We are interested in just Algeria.” Ten years later, in the fall of 2004, a spin-off and successor to the GIA, called the “Salafist Group for Preaching and Struggle” (GSPC) reversed the GIA‟s decision and contacted Abu Muscab al-Zarqawi, the (now deceased) leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq. What caused the group to reverse its predecessor‟s decision? According to one account, immediately following 9/11 the Bush administration changed its designation of the GSPC from a “regional insurgency” to a terrorist group.
  • The Battle Between Secularism and Islam in Algeria's Quest for Democracy

    The Battle Between Secularism and Islam in Algeria's Quest for Democracy

    Pluralism Betrayed: The Battle Between Secularism and Islam in Algeria's Quest for Democracy Peter A. Samuelsont I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................... 309 f1. BACKGROUND TO THE ELECTIONS AND THE COUP ................................ 311 A. Algeria's Economic Crisis ......................................... 311 B. Algeria's FirstMultiparty Elections in 1990 for Local Offices ................ 313 C. The FIS Victory in the 1991 ParliamentaryElections ...................... 314 D. The Coup dt& tat ................................................ 318 E. Western Response to the Coup ...................................... 322 III. EVALUATING THE LEGITIMACY OF THE COUP ................................ 325 A. Problems Presented by Pluralism .................................... 326 B. Balancing Majority Rights Against Minority Rights ........................ 327 C. The Role of Religion in Society ...................................... 329 D. Islamic Jurisprudence ............................................ 336 1. Islamic Views of Democracy and Pluralism ......................... 337 2. Islam and Human Rights ...................................... 339 IV. PROBABLE ACTIONS OF AN FIS PARLIAMENTARY MAJORITY ........................ 340 A. The FIS Agenda ................................................ 342 1. Trends Within the FIS ........................................ 342 2. The Process of Democracy: The Allocation of Power .................. 345 a. Indicationsof DemocraticPotential .......................... 346
  • HIZB UT-TAHRIR Islam’S Political Insurgency

    HIZB UT-TAHRIR Islam’S Political Insurgency

    HIZB UT-TAHRIR Islam’s Political Insurgency Zeyno Baran The Nixon Center December 2004 About the Nixon Center The Nixon Center is a non-partisan public policy institution established by former President Richard Nixon shortly before his death in 1994. Committed to the analysis of policy challenges to the United States through the prism of the American national interest, the Center is a substantively and programmatically independent division of the Richard Nixon Library and Birthplace Foundation. Major programs of The Nixon Center include the Chinese Studies Program, Immigration and National Security Forum, International Security and Energy Program, National Security Program, Regional Strategic Program, and U.S.- Russian Relations Program. Topics addressed by the Center’s programs range from U.S. relations with China and Russia to energy geopolitics in the Persian Gulf and Caspian Basin and European security issues. The Center is supported by the Nixon Library and Birthplace Foundation endowment as well as by foundation, corporate and individual donors. Copyright 2004 The Nixon Center. All Rights Reserved. “Hizb ut-Tahrir: Islam’s Political Insurgency” By Zeyno Baran The Nixon Center 1615 L Street, N.W., Suite 1250 Washington, DC 20036 Phone: (202) 887-1000 Fax: (202) 887-5222 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.nixoncenter.org Editing, Layout and Design by Thomas M. Rickers Order from the Richard Nixon Library and Birthplace Foundation 1-800-USA-8865 INTRODUCTORY NOTE This Nixon Center monograph, Hizb ut-Tahrir: Islam’s Political Insurgency, breaks new ground in exploring the danger posed by the spread of radical Islamist ideology. The focus of this monograph is Hizb ut-Tahrir al-Islamiyya (The Islamic Party of Liberation), which has successfully sown the seeds of an ideology encouraging a clash of civilizations in over forty countries.
  • Pan-Arabism and the United Arab Republic by Michael Habib

    Pan-Arabism and the United Arab Republic by Michael Habib

    Pan-Arabism and the United Arab Republic by Michael Habib A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Wilkes Honors College in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts in Liberal Arts and Sciences with a Concentration in History Wilkes Honors College of Florida Atlantic University Jupiter, Florida May 2016 Pan-Arabism and the United Arab Republic By Michael Habib This thesis was prepared under the direction of the candidate’s thesis advisor, Dr. Christopher Ely, and has been approved by the members of his supervisory committee. It was submitted to the faculty of The Honors College and was accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in Liberal Arts and Sciences. SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: ___________________________ Dr. Christopher Ely ____________________________ Dr. Douglas McGetchin ______________________________ Dean Jeffrey Buller, Wilkes Honors College ____________ Date i ABSTRACT Author: Michael Habib Title: Pan-Arabism and the United Arab Republic Institution: Wilkes Honors College of Florida Atlantic University Thesis Advisor: Dr. Christopher Ely Degree: Bachelor of Arts in Liberal Arts and Sciences Concentration: History Year: 2016 This thesis seeks to analyze Pan-Arabism through the lens of the United Arab Republic. I argue that even though the UAR faced many internal issues, it ultimately failed due to external pressures. I argue this to provide a new perspective on the Middle East and the Arab world, by showing how it came to be as it is. I organize my thesis into four chapters: I. Introduction: Arab Unity and its Limits, II. The Marriage of Syria and Egypt, III.
  • Download Article PDF , Format and Size of the File

    Download Article PDF , Format and Size of the File

    Volume 87 Number 858 June 2005 Encountering perceptions in parts of the Muslim world and their impact on the ICRC’s ability to be eff ective Andreas Wigger* Andreas Wigger is Deputy to the Director of Operations of the International Committee of the Red Cross Abstract Th e growing and intensifi ed manifestations of religion in politics and vice versa are part of the environment of ICRC operations in Muslim countries and mark especially the interaction with Islamists. Diff erent perceptions held by Muslims are examined, problem areas regarding interaction with the ICRC are analysed and aspects are mentioned which, in the opinion of the author, can help the ICRC improve its activities in Muslim countries. Th e conclusions of the examination could be relevant in any relationship with conservative movements within other religions. : : : : : : : Any Muslim person or organization working in the West, and any western individual or organization working in the Muslim world, will be confronted with myths. Deep-seated traumas stemming from historical contact with the “other” are being revived and updated, be those “others” the Crusaders, the colonialists and their alleged modern variants, or the Muslim troops ranged before the gates of Vienna or Poitiers and the global Jihadi1 who, it is claimed, are intent on destroying western civilization. Hatred is being fomented, fear is being spread, and ignorance gives myths an aura of reality. The confrontation * Th e views expressed in this article refl ect the author’s opinions and not necessarily those of the ICRC. 343 A. Wigger — Encountering perceptions in parts of the Muslim world of recent years between al Qaeda and both western and other societies and governments has heightened the centuries-old complexity of relations between the West and the Muslim East and their perceptions of each other.
  • Abul A'la Maududi and Sayyed Qutb on Revolution: a Comparative Analysis

    Abul A'la Maududi and Sayyed Qutb on Revolution: a Comparative Analysis

    AL-ADWA 47:32 43 Abul A'la Maududi and Sayyed Qutb.. Abul A'la Maududi and Sayyed Qutb on Revolution: A Comparative Analysis Munir Masood Marath* Revolution in terms of a change process has been subject to debate in occidental as well as in oriental intellectual and political circles alike. For instance, in the modern history, though revolution in terms of an instrument of instability was despicable to German philosopher Friedrich Hegel owing to a profound influence of Romanticism which in the wake of French Revolution, with the philosophical crutches provided by Edmond Burk and Hume overshadowed Rationalism but at the same time, he cherished the idea of revolution in terms of an agent of positive development of history on the basis of dialectics.1 He deserves rich tributes to present a logical conflict-model of opposite ideas which he terms as thesis and anti-thesis resulting in the emergence of a new idea which is synthesis of the good qualities of thesis and anti-thesis. In other words, he viewed conflict as a positive source of historical development and a medium of transferring positive qualities from one phase of history to another meaning thereby that conflict finds justification only if it helps to develop a better system than the existing one. If promise of a better order is imperative to justify the very genesis of a change process whether it is in the form of a conflict of ideas or a revolution, then the agents of the change process must look for a theory of change which may explain three important questions: one, what is the philosophical rationale and justification of revolution; two, what is the road-map of revolution; three, what will be the form of political structure replacing the older system.
  • Hizb Ut-Tahrir Ideology and Strategy

    Hizb Ut-Tahrir Ideology and Strategy

    HIZB UT-TAHRIR IDEOLOGY AND STRATEGY “The fierce struggle… between the Muslims and the Kuffar, has been intense ever since the dawn of Islam... It will continue in this way – a bloody struggle alongside the intellectual struggle – until the Hour comes and Allah inherits the Earth...” Hizb ut-Tahrir The Centre for Social Cohesion Houriya Ahmed & Hannah Stuart HIZB UT-TAHRIR IDEOLOGY AND STRATEGY “The fierce struggle… between the Muslims and the Kuffar, has been intense ever since the dawn of Islam... It will continue in this way – a bloody struggle alongside the intellectual struggle – until the Hour comes and Allah inherits the Earth...” Hizb ut-Tahrir The Centre for Social Cohesion Houriya Ahmed & Hannah Stuart Hizb ut-Tahrir Ideology and Strategy Houriya Ahmed and Hannah Stuart 2009 The Centre for Social Cohesion Clutha House, 10 Storey’s Gate London SW1P 3AY Tel: +44 (0)20 7222 8909 Fax: +44 (0)5 601527476 Email: [email protected] www.socialcohesion.co.uk The Centre for Social Cohesion Limited by guarantee Registered in England and Wales: No. 06609071 © The Centre for Social Cohesion, November 2009 All the Institute’s publications seek to further its objective of promoting human rights for the benefit of the public. The views expressed are those of the author, not of the Institute. Hizb ut-Tahrir: Ideology and Strategy By Houriya Ahmed and Hannah Stuart ISBN 978-0-9560013-4-4 All rights reserved The map on the front cover depicts Hizb ut-Tahrir’s vision for its Caliphate in ‘Islamic Lands’ ABOUT THE AUTHORS Houriya Ahmed is a Research Fellow at the Centre for Social Cohesion (CSC).
  • Islamic Movements Syllabus

    Islamic Movements Syllabus

    Islamic Movements Tugrul Keskin Portland State University 1. Course Overview This course will review and analyze the increasing trend of Islamic movements (IM) and Islamic parties (IP) around the world in the global age of capitalism and the contemporary Muslim world. In the course, we focus on IM and IP and their relationship with global capitalism, democracy, free speech, human rights, inequality, colonialism/imperialism, modernity, secularism and governance. All of these concepts are directly related with the conditions of modernity which have been created by the free market economy; therefore, I perceive Political Islam (IM and IP) as a product of modern conditions, such as urbanization, the emergence of a manufacture-based economy, the increased availability of higher education, women’s participation in education and the workforce, and the elimination of traditional social values. The conditions of modernity created the concept of democracy in the modern world. Christianity and Judaism have consequently been struggling to redefine themselves under the new rules and regulations – not revelations - for over 200 years; whereas in Muslim Societies, the conditions of modernity challenge Islam and Muslims. Therefore, Muslims will be forced to decide between the expression and practice of Din/Religion and the material world in their daily life. There is therefore an ongoing struggle between the observance of God and the pursuit of material conditions. Although Political Islam could be seen as a direct reaction to modern politics, Islam is actually an inherently political religion that rules and regulates every aspect of a believer’s daily life, much in the same way as economic conditions do.
  • Political Islam: a 40 Year Retrospective

    Political Islam: a 40 Year Retrospective

    religions Article Political Islam: A 40 Year Retrospective Nader Hashemi Josef Korbel School of International Studies, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA; [email protected] Abstract: The year 2020 roughly corresponds with the 40th anniversary of the rise of political Islam on the world stage. This topic has generated controversy about its impact on Muslims societies and international affairs more broadly, including how governments should respond to this socio- political phenomenon. This article has modest aims. It seeks to reflect on the broad theme of political Islam four decades after it first captured global headlines by critically examining two separate but interrelated controversies. The first theme is political Islam’s acquisition of state power. Specifically, how have the various experiments of Islamism in power effected the popularity, prestige, and future trajectory of political Islam? Secondly, the theme of political Islam and violence is examined. In this section, I interrogate the claim that mainstream political Islam acts as a “gateway drug” to radical extremism in the form of Al Qaeda or ISIS. This thesis gained popularity in recent years, yet its validity is open to question and should be subjected to further scrutiny and analysis. I examine these questions in this article. Citation: Hashemi, Nader. 2021. Political Islam: A 40 Year Keywords: political Islam; Islamism; Islamic fundamentalism; Middle East; Islamic world; Retrospective. Religions 12: 130. Muslim Brotherhood https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12020130 Academic Editor: Jocelyne Cesari Received: 26 January 2021 1. Introduction Accepted: 9 February 2021 Published: 19 February 2021 The year 2020 roughly coincides with the 40th anniversary of the rise of political Islam.1 While this trend in Muslim politics has deeper historical and intellectual roots, it Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral was approximately four decades ago that this subject emerged from seeming obscurity to with regard to jurisdictional claims in capture global attention.
  • Islamist and Middle Eastern Terrorism: a Threat to Europe?

    Islamist and Middle Eastern Terrorism: a Threat to Europe?

    © Rubbettino Centro Militare di Studi Strategici - Roma © Rubbettino Islamist and Middle Eastern Terrorism: A threat to Europe? Maria do Céu Pinto (University of Minho Portugal) Rubbettino © Rubbettino Copyright © by CeMiSS Centro Militare di Studi Strategici Piazza della Rovere, 83 - 00165 Roma (RM) e-mail: [email protected] © 2004 - Rubbettino Editore 88049 Soveria Mannelli - Viale Rosario Rubbettino, 10 -Tel. (0968) 662034 www.rubbettino.it © Rubbettino Index Abstract: 7 Introduction 9 I Islamist and Middle Eastern Terrorism in Europe: The Background 11 I.1. Palestinian Terrorism 11 I.2. Iranian Terrorism 17 II New Patterns of Islamist Terrorism in the 1990s 21 II.1. A New Age of Terrorism 21 II.2. Religious Terrorism 22 III The Web of Terror in Europe 31 III.1. Interlocking Terror Plots 31 III.2. Al-Qaeda: an Umbrella Network 32 III.3. Mosques: Recruitment and Indoctrination 36 IV Groups and Activities of Islamic Terrorists in Europe 41 IV.1. England 41 IV.2. France And Belgium 49 IV.3. Italy 53 IV.4. Germany 62 IV.5. Spain 65 IV.6. The Netherlands 71 V Evaluating the Terrorist Threat to Europe’s Security 75 V.1. Al-Qaeda’s European Infrastructure after 11th September 75 V.2. Islamic Communities in Europe: A Breeding Ground of Terrorists? 76 Conclusion 77 Bibliography 79 © Rubbettino 5 © Rubbettino Abstract During three decades Middle Eastern terrorism in Europe was largely a spillover from problems in the Middle East. Europe was a preferential oper- ational area for Arab, Palestinian and Iranian terrorists fighting each other. In the 1990s, a new Islamic threat emerged as a result of the activities of “ad hoc” terrorist groups, which lack a well-established organisational identity and tend to decentralise and compartmentalise their activities.
  • Migration Story: from Muslim Immigrants to European Citizens of The

    Migration Story: from Muslim Immigrants to European Citizens of The

    A Migration Story From Muslim Immigrants to European "Citizens of the Heart?"' BASSAM TIBI Although a newcomer with regard to migration of a global scope, Europe has become a popular destination for Muslim immigrants, taking in more Muslims than the U.S. in recent years. It is currently home to more than 20 million Muslims. However, despite their large numbers, these im- migrants are not integrated into European society. They are therefore sus- ceptible to the political Islam that is making Europe its battlefront. As the prominent New York Times journalist Richard Bernstein, who led the Berlin office of that paper for four years, wrote in his farewell col- umn, Europeans believe they live in a Tuscan paradise and hate to see the problems in the "world beyond." 2 Bernstein noted that this European senti- ment can be described as "wealthy, soignde, [and] ecologically correct" and that European opinion leaders believe they are "distant from vexing prob- lems like Muslim immigration."3 Stuck in this mindset, Europeans do not view themselves as confronted with what is perceived to be "Islam" or with its jihadist dimension. The perception that jihadist assaults by al-Qaeda on September 11, 2001 were the result of an unsettled score between the Arabs and the United States was belied by a consistent series of events in Europe ranging from attacks in Madrid on March 11, 2004 to the foiled plot in London in August 2006. What is the underlying story? Dr. Professor Bassam Tibi is a world-renowned political scientist, a professor of internationalrelations at the University of Giittingen, Germany, and the A.D.
  • The Power of Ideas. the Influence of Hassan Al-Banna and Sayyid Qutb on the Muslim Brotherhood Organization1

    The Power of Ideas. the Influence of Hassan Al-Banna and Sayyid Qutb on the Muslim Brotherhood Organization1

    Przegl¹d Strategiczny 2015, nr 8 Ronnie AZOULAY DOI 10.14746/ps.2015.1.12 Israel National Water Company “Mekorot” THE POWER OF IDEAS. THE INFLUENCE OF HASSAN AL-BANNA AND SAYYID QUTB ON THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD ORGANIZATION1 This article examines the conceptions of the political thoughts of Hassan al-Banna and Sayyid Qutb, two of the most important Arab theorists of the Muslim world during the twentieth century. They are often considered as Islamists or radical Islamists. While al-Banna was the theoretician of the Muslim Brotherhood and is represented by the mainstream of the Muslim Brotherhood, Qutb’s writings are represented by the militant Islam movements. This article also attempts to account for some of the differences be- tween the two theorists’ views. The article aspires to widen the spectrum of political science and give insight to Western knowledge. In addition, this article focuses on the most significant ideas of Hassan al-Banna and Sayyid Qutb, what similarities and dif- ferences exist, what each leader’s contribution has been, and how these ideas continue to affect the Muslim Brotherhood movement until today. MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD – BACKGROUND Following the deep ideological crisis within the Muslim world during the nineteenth century, thinkers such as al-Afghani (1839–1897), Muhammad Abduh (1849–1905) and Rashid Rida (1865–1935) attempted to find creative solutions that would rescue the Muslim world from the superiority of the West. Rashid Rida developed the concept that a great disaster has fallen upon the Islamic world due to Salafist theory being neglected. Consequently, Rida developed a new theory based on the writings of Ibn Taymiyya, stating that the only way to strengthen the Islamic world is to return to its greatness.