DOCSLIB.ORG

Unless Otherwise Noted, All References Are to Sections (“§”). Current To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unless Otherwise Noted, All References Are to Sections (“§”). Current To Index Unless otherwise noted, all references are to sections (ª§º). Current to release 2017-4. 9-1-1, see: EMERGENCY 911 SERVICE APPEALS, see: REVIEWS AND AP- PEALS ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION, 724(b) BALLOTING interexchange services, 703(d) ACCESS, see also: international servcices, 703(g) INTERCONNECTION antennas, to, see: ANTENNA AND SITE SHARING BASIC SERVICE OBJECTIVE, see: buildings by carriers, access to, 715 DUTY TO SERVE directory databases, access to, 714 disputes, resolution of, 716 BASIC SERVICES , see also: DUTY TO mandated access, 710 SERVE private land by carriers, access to, see: Edmonton Telephones, provision by, 202 CARRIERS, powers of (fn 29) public land by carriers, access to, see: FTA, application to, 727 CARRIERS, powers of GATS, application to, 729(e) support structures, access to, 713 NAFTA, application to, 728(b) resale of, 717 ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLU- TION, see: DISPUTE RESOLUTION BELL CANADA, 201 ANTENNA AND TOWER SITE SHAR- BELL CANADA ACT, App A7 ING, 300(b)(iii), 710(c) duty to serve, 201, 305(b) legislative history, 201 mergers and acquisitions, CRTC ap- ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY PE- proval, 314(a)(i) NALTIES (AMPs) violation of CASL, 512 violation of CRTC decisions and regula- BOARD OF RAILWAY COMMIS- tions, 512 SIONERS violation of Telecommunications Act, CRTC as successor of, 501 315(d), 512 status of decisions and orders of, 501 violation of UTR, 315(d) BOARD OF TRANSPORT COMMIS- AFFILIATE RULE, 717(c) SIONERS towers, to, see: ANTENNA AND SITE CRTC as successor of, 501 SHARING status of decisions and orders of, 501 ANTI-COMPETITIVE PRACTICES, see BROADCASTING also COMPETITION ACT Broadcasting Act, App A11 GATS Reference Paper, 729(d) broadcasting undertakings, application of Telecom Act to, 110(d) IND-1 (Telecommunications) (2017Ð4) INDEX CRTC, and, 501 resellers as, 110(a) Telecommunications Act, s. 28, and, SILECs as, 110 605(e) Telecommunications Act, application to, 110 BUNDLING, see: SERVICE BUNDLING Telesat as, 110 wireless service providers as, 110 BYPASS, see: ROUTING RESTRIC- TIONS CANADIAN NUMBERING ADMINIS- TRATOR, 520 CABINET, see: GOVERNOR IN COUN- CANADIAN NUMBERING ADMINIS- CIL TRATOR CONSORTIUM INC., 520 ªCABINET APPEALS,º see also: RE- CANADIAN OWNERSHIP AND CON- VIEWS AND APPEALS TROL, 301 Broadcasting Act, under, 301(b)(iii), 731 ªCABINET APPEALSº, 915±919, see also: Canada-US Free Trade Agreement, under, GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL; REVIEWS 724 AND APPEALS control in fact, 301(b) Cabinet decisions, 919(b), Figure 9-1 earth stations, 301(a) reasons for decision, 916 GATS, under, 729(e) scope of Cabinet authority, 917 grandfathering, 301(c), 319 procedure, 903, Figure 9-2 North American Free Trade Agreement, stay of CRTC decision pending petition, under, 728(b), 729(e) by Cabinet, 915 regulations, 301(d), App B10 by CRTC, 910 satellite services, 301(a), 729(e) threshold for Cabinet review, 919(a) submarine cables, 301(a) Telecommunications Act, under, 301 CABLE COMPANIES, 200 Teleglobe, 300(b)(ii), 729(e) Canadian Carriers, as, 110 Telesat, 300(b)(ii), 729(e) CANADA-US FREE TRADE AGREE- CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND MENT, 727, App D TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMIS- access to facilities, 727 SION (CRTC) basic services, 727 application of Access to Information Act bypass, 727 to, 514 computer services, 727 Board of Railway Commissioners, CRTC enhanced services, 727, 728(b) as successor of, 501 foreign ownership, 727 Board of Transport Commissioners, national treatment, 727 CRTC as successor of, 501 terminal equipment, 727 Canadian Radio and Television Commis- sion as successor of in relation to CANADIAN ANTI-SPAM LEGISLA- broadcasting, 501 TION (CASL), 316, App A10 Canadian Transport Commission, CRTC AMPS, 512(a) as successor of, 111(b), 501 commissioners CANADIAN CARRIERS appointment and duties, 502 cable service providers as, 110 Chairperson, appointment and duties of, definition of, 110 502 exemption from regulation, 110(c), 504(h) regional, 502 ILECs as, 110 Vice Chairperson, appointment and du- ISPs as, 110 ties of, 502 private carriers as, 110(b) Competition Bureau, interface with, 517 IND-2 INDEX constitution of, 501 costs, award of, see COSTS, award of by decisions and decision making CRTC appeals from decisions, see: ªCABINET CRTC Rules of Practice and Procedure, APPEALSº; REVIEWS AND AP- 800, App B1 PEALS confidentiality, 817 contingent orders, 505 cross-examination, 812 decision making process, 506 discovery, 804 directions by Governor in Council, 109, evidence 508 examination ªout-of-courtº, 810 duty to decide, 507 proof of documents, 810 enforcement, 511 rules of, application of, 810 interim orders, 505 institution of proceedings, 801 internal reviews, see: REVIEWS AND interrogatories, 811 APPEALS interventions, 809 judicial review of decisions, see: RE- notice of proceedings, 802 VIEWS AND APPEALS oral hearings, 806 penalties for violation of, 322 paper proceedings, 806 publication of decisions in Canada Gaz- pre-hearing conferences, 808 ette, effect of, 513 procedural fairness, application of rules reasons for decision, 814 of, 800 jurisdiction and powers production of documents, 805 access to carrier directory databases, 714 references to Federal Court of Appeal, 816 change of control of carriers, see MER- regional hearings, 807 GERS AND ACQUISITIONS rules of procedure, 800 contempt, power to punish for, 511 self-crimination and application of Cana- content of messages, regulation of, 730 da Evidence Act, 813 declarations, 504(a) service of documents, 803 delegation of powers, 502 staff papers and documents, disclosure of, entry by carriers onto public lands, see: 818 CARRIERS, powers, entry onto public subpoenas, 818 lands witnesses, attendance of, 813 exemption power, 504(h) general powers, 504 CANADIAN RADIO AND TELEVISION mandatory and restraining orders, 504(b) COMMISSION mergers and acquisitions of carriers, see CRTC as successor of in relation to MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS broadcasting, 501 numbering, 520 quality of service, 614(c) CANADIAN TRANSPORT COMMIS- rates, see: RATES AND RATE REG- SION ULATION, CRTC jurisdiction CRTC as successor of, 111(b), 501 interconnection, see: INTER- status of decisions and orders of, 501 CONNECTION, CRTC jurisdiction remedies, 510 CARRIERS structural separation of carriers, 720 AGT, 202 support structures, access to, 713 Alberta Government Telephones, 202 terminal attachment, 718(a) Aliant, 205 unsolicited telecommunications, 315 Allstream, 218A, 314(c),(d) organization of, 501 Amtelcom, 210 committees, 502 AT&T Canada Inc., 218A meetings, 502 Avalon Telephone Company, 201 (fn) offices, 502 Bell Aliant, 200, 201, 205 powers, see: jurisdiction and powers BC TEL, 202 proceedings, conduct of, 800-823 Bell Canada, 200, 201 IND-3 (Telecommunications) (2017Ð4) INDEX Bell Mobility, 200, 201, 213 ISPs, Bragg Communications, 200, 210 constitutional jurisdiction, 100 British Columbia Telephone Company, market shares, Figures 2-10, 2-11 202 regulation by CRTC, 110 Bruce Telecom, 207, 314(c) Kenora Municipal Telephone System, 205 cable-based, market share of, 200 Koodo, 216 Figure, 2-4 to 2-11 liability of carriers, 400±419 Call-Net Enterprises, 208 addressee, to, 404 Canadian Carriers, see: CANADIAN common carriers, as, 403 CARRIERS connecting carriers, to, 414 Cantel, 215 copyright infringement, 418 change of control of carriers, see: MER- damages, measure of, 405-407 GERS AND ACQUISITIONS directory omissions, for, 417 Chatr, 215 limitation of, 408-417 Cityfone, 215 statutory, 402 Clearnet, 216 third parties, to, 413 CLECs tort, in, 401 entry obligations, 706 contract, in, 400 local competition, 703(c), (e), 706(a) defamation, 416 registration requirement, 300, 706(a) licensing, 300 Cogeco, 200, 212 basic international telecommunications Distributel, 200, 220 services, 300(a) Dryden Municipal Telephone System, 205 CLECs, certification of, 706(a) duty to serve, see: DUTY TO SERVE commercial mobile radio services, ED TEL, 202 300(b)(iii)(B) Eastlink, 200, 210, 314(c) earth stations, 300(b) exemption from regulation, 110(c), 504(h) interexchange carriers (IXCs), registra- Fido, 215 tion of, 704(a) Freedom Mobile, 214 international service providers, 300(a) Globalive, 214 international services, 300(a) ownership and control of, 301, 300(b)(iii) international submarine cables, 300(c), Hydro One Telecom, 218 App B12 ILECs, 200, 201-205, Figure 2-1 pay telephone service providers, regis- large, 200±206 tration of, 707 market share, 200, Figures 2-4 to 2-11 Radiocommunications Act, under, operating territoties, 200 300(b)(i) regulation of rates of, see: RATES AND radio authorization, 300(b)(ii) RATE REGULATION radio licence, 300(b)(i) SILECs, see: SILECs resellers, registration of, 717(a) market shares, 200, 225 satellite services, 300(b)(iii)(c) operating territories, Figure 2±1 sharing groups, registration of, 717(a) regulation of rates of large ILECs, 614 spectrum licence, 300(b)(ii) incorporation of carriers, 300 terrestrial services, 300(b)(iii)(A) federal, 300 Manitoba Telecom Services, see MTS provincial, 300 (fn) Maritime Tel & Tel, 201 (fn), 205 Special Act, by, 300 Microcell, 300(b)(iii), 314(c) Bell Canada, 201 Mobilicity, 215, 300(b)(iii) British Columbia Telephone Company, Mobility Personam Canada, 300(b)(iii) 202 MTS, 200, 204, 314(c), (d) Teleglobe, 223 municipal carriers, 207 Telesat, 217 NBTel, 205 independents, see: SILECs New Brunswick Telephone Company, 201 Island Telecom, 201 (fn), 205 (fn), 205 Island Telephone Company, 201 (fn), 205 IND-4 INDEX Newfoundland Telephone Company, 201 WIND, 214, 300(b)(iii) (fn), 205 ownership
Load more

Recommended publications
  • International Benchmarking of Australian Telecommunications International Services Benchmarking
    telecoms.qxd 9/03/99 10:06 AM Page 1 International Benchmarking of Australian Telecommunications International Services Benchmarking March 1999 Commonwealth of Australia 1999 ISBN 0 646 33589 8 This work is subject to copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, the work may be reproduced in whole or in part for study or training purposes, subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source. Reproduction for commercial use or sale requires prior written permission from AusInfo. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Manager, Legislative Services, AusInfo, GPO Box 1920, Canberra, ACT, 2601. Inquiries: Media and Publications Productivity Commission Locked Bag 2 Collins Street East Post Office Melbourne Vic 8003 Tel: (03) 9653 2244 Fax: (03) 9653 2303 Email: [email protected] An appropriate citation for this paper is: Productivity Commission 1999, International Benchmarking of Australian Telecommunications Services, Research Report, AusInfo, Melbourne, March. The Productivity Commission The Productivity Commission, an independent Commonwealth agency, is the Government’s principal review and advisory body on microeconomic policy and regulation. It conducts public inquiries and research into a broad range of economic and social issues affecting the welfare of Australians. The Commission’s independence is underpinned by an Act of Parliament. Its processes and outputs are open to public scrutiny and are driven by concern for the wellbeing of the community as a whole. Information on the Productivity Commission, its publications and its current work program can be found on the World Wide Web at www.pc.gov.au or by contacting Media and Publications on (03) 9653 2244.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDICES to the Evidence of Michael Piaskoski Rogers Communications Partnership
    EB-2015-0141 Ontario Energy Board IN THE MATTER OF the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c.15, (Schedule B); AND IN THE MATTER OF Decision EB-2013-0416/EB- 2014-0247 of the Ontario Energy Board (the “OEB”) issued March 12, 2015 approving distribution rates and charges for Hydro One Networks Inc. (“Hydro One”) for 2015 through 2017, including an increase to the Pole Access Charge; AND IN THE MATTER OF the Decision of the OEB issued April 17, 2015 setting the Pole Access Charge as interim rather than final; AND IN THE MATTER OF the Decision and Order issued June 30, 2015 by the OEB granting party status to Rogers Communications Partnership, Allstream Inc., Shaw Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., on behalf of itself and its affiliate, Cogeco Cable Canada LP, Quebecor Media, Bragg Communications, Packet-tel Corp., Niagara Regional Broadband Network, Tbaytel, Independent Telecommunications Providers Association (ITPA) and Canadian Cable Systems Alliance Inc. (CCSA) (collectively, the “Carriers”); AND IN THE MATTER OF Procedural Order No. 4 of the OEB issued October 26, 2015 setting dates for, inter alia, evidence of the Carriers. APPENDICES to the Evidence of Michael Piaskoski Rogers Communications Partnership November 20, 2015 EB-2015-0141 APPENDIX A to the Evidence of Michael Piaskoski Rogers Communications Partnership November 20, 2015 Michael E. Piaskoski SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS Eight years in Rogers Regulatory proceeded by 12 years as a telecom lawyer specializing in regulatory, competition and commercial matters. Bright, professional and ambitious performer who continually exceeds expectations. Expertise in drafting cogent, concise and easy-to-understand regulatory and legal filings and litigation materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Planning Document NPA 604 Numbering Relief
    Initial Planning Document NPA 604 Numbering Relief 250 604 CNA Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC Canada) July 27, 1999 As Presented on 24 September 1999 INITIAL PLANNING DOCUMENT NPA 604 NUMBERING RELIEF JULY 27, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 1 2. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 3. CENTRAL OFFICE CODE EXHAUST .................................................................................................... 2 4. CODE RELIEF METHODS...................................................................................................................... 3 4.1. Geographic Split.............................................................................................................................. 3 4.1.1. Definition ...................................................................................................................................... 3 4.1.2. General Attributes ........................................................................................................................ 4 4.2. Distributed Overlay .......................................................................................................................... 4 4.2.1. Definition .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PART a Definitions and General Terms 5 ITEM 100
    iTeraTEL Communications CRTC 15190 ACCESS SERVICES TARIFF Original Title Page ACCESS SERVICES TARIFF This Tariff sets out the rates, terms and conditions applicable to the interconnection arrangements provisioned to providers of telecommunications services and facilities. Issue Date: December 2,2019 Effective Date: January 15, 2015 Tariff Notice 1 iTeraTEL Communications Inc. CRTC 15190 ACCESS SERVICES TARIFF Original Page 1 Explanation of Symbols The following symbols are used in this Tariff and have meanings as shown: A Increase in rate or charge C Change in wording D Discontinued rate or regulation F Reformatting of existing material with no change to rate or charge M Matter moved from its previous location N New wording, rate or charge R Reduction in rate or charge S Reissued matter Abbreviations of Companies Names The following companies names are used in this Tariff and have meanings as shown: Aliant Aliant Telecom Inc. Bell Bell Canada Bell Aliant Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership IslandTel Island Telecom Inc. MTS MTS Allstream Inc. MTT Maritime Tel & Tel Limited NBTel NBTel NewTel NewTel Communications NorthernTel NorthernTel, Limited Partnership SaskTel SaskTel TBayTel TBayTel TCBC TELUS Communications Company, operating in British Columbia TCC TELUS Communications Company TCI TELUS Communications Company, operating in Alberta TCQ TELUS Communications Company, operating in Quebec Télébec Télébec, société en commandite Issue Date: December 2,2019 Effective Date: January 15, 2015 Tariff Notice 1 iTeraTEL Communications Inc. CRTC 15190 ACCESS SERVICES TARIFF Original Page 2 Check Page Issue Date: December 2, 2019 Effective Date: January 15, 2020 Tariff Notice 1 iTeraTEL Communications Inc. CRTC 15190 ACCESS SERVICES TARIFF Original Page 3 Table of Contents Page Explanation of Symbols 1 Abbreviations of Companies Names 1 Check Page 2 Table of Contents 3 PART A Definitions and General Terms 5 ITEM 100.
    [Show full text]
  • Horizon Book of Authorities
    PATENTED MEDICINE PRICES REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OF THE PATENT ACT R.S.C. 1985, C. P-4, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF HORIZON PHARMA PLC (THE “RESPONDENT”) AND THE MEDICINE CYSTEAMINE BITARTRATE SOLD BY THE RESPONDENT UNDER THE TRADE NAME PROCYSBI® BOOK OF AUTHORITIES OF THE RESPONDENT (MOTION TO BIFURCATE, STRIKE EVIDENCE AND FOR THE INSPECTION AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS) Torys LLP 79 Wellington St. W., Suite 3000 Toronto ON M5K 1N2 Fax: 416.865.7380 Sheila R. Block Tel: 416.865.7319 [email protected] Andrew M. Shaughnessy Tel: 416.865.8171 [email protected] Rachael Saab Tel: 416.865.7676 [email protected] Stacey Reisman Tel: 416.865.7537 [email protected] Counsel to Respondent, Horizon Pharma PLC INDEX 1. Board Decision – Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. and the Medicine “Soliris” (September 20, 2017) 2. Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 734 3. Celgene Corp. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2011 SCC 1 4. Board Decision – Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. and the Medicine “Soliris” (March 29, 2016) 5. Mayne Pharma (Canada) Inc. v. Aventis Pharma Inc., 2005 FCA 50 6. P.S. Partsource Inc. v. Canadian Tire Corp., 2001 FCA 8 7. Harrop (Litigation Guardian of) v. Harrop, 2010 ONCA 390 8. Merck & Co v. Canada (Minister of Health), 2003 FC 1511 9. Vancouver Airport Authority v. Commissioner of Competition, 2018 FCA 24 10. Merck & Co, Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Health), 2003 FC 1242 11. H-D Michigan Inc. v. Berrada, 2007 FC 995 12. Roger T. Hughes, Arthur Renaud & Trent Horne, Canadian Federal Courts Practice 2019 (Toronto: LexisNexis Canada Inc., 2019) 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcasting and Telecommunications Legislative Review
    BROADCASTING AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS LEGISLATIVE REVIEW APPENDIX 4 TO SUBMISSION OF CANADIAN NETWORK OPERATORS CONSORTIUM INC. TO THE BROADCASTING AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS LEGISLATIVE REVIEW PANEL 11 JANUARY 2019 BEFORE THE CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF RECONSIDERATION OF TELECOM DECISION 2017-56 REGARDING FINAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR WHOLESALE MOBILE WIRELESS ROAMING SERVICE, TELECOM NOTICE OF CONSULTATION CRTC 2017-259, 20 JULY 2017 SUPPLEMENTAL INTERVENTION OF ICE WIRELESS INC. 27 OCTOBER 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 A note on terminology ................................................................................................................ 9 2.0 SUMMARY OF DR. VON WARTBURG’S REPORT ............................................................... 10 3.0 CANADA’S MOBILE WIRELESS MARKET IS NOT COMPETITIVE .................................. 13 3.1 Canada’s mobile wireless market is extremely concentrated in the hands of the three national wireless carriers ........................................................................................................................ 14 3.2 Mobile wireless penetration rates and mobile data usage indicate that the mobile wireless market is not sufficiently competitive......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Global Telecommunications Primer
    MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER Equity Research June 1999 Global Telecommunications Global Telecommunications Primer A Guide to the Information Superhighway The Global Telecommunications Team MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER Global Telecommunications Team North America Wireline U.K/Europe Cellular Simon Flannery [email protected] (212) 761-6432 Fanos Hira [email protected] (44171) 425-6675 Margaret Berghausen [email protected] (212) 761-6392 Jerry Dellis [email protected] (44171) 425-5371 April Henry [email protected] (212) 761-4669 U.K./Europe Alternative Carriers Peter Kennedy [email protected] (212) 761-8033 Edings Thibault [email protected] (212) 761-8553 Saeed Baradar [email protected] (44171) 425-6594 Myles Davis [email protected] (212) 761-6916 Vathana Ly Vath [email protected] (44171) 425-6014 Richard Lee [email protected] (212) 761-3685 Europe Emerging Markets North America Data & Internet Services Damon Guirdham [email protected] (44171) 425-6665 Jeffrey Camp [email protected] (212) 761-3112 Anton Inshutin [email protected] (7 503) 785-2232 Stephen Flynn [email protected] (212) 761-8294 Latin America North America Wireless Luiz Carvalho [email protected] (212) 761-4876 Colette Fleming [email protected] (212) 761-8223 Vera R. Rossi [email protected] (212) 761-4484 Mark Kinarney [email protected] (212) 761-6342 Steve Amaro [email protected] (212) 761-3403 North America Independents and Rural Telephony Asia/Pacific Steven Franck [email protected] (212) 761-7124 Mark Shuper [email protected] (65) 439-8954 Bhaskar Dole [email protected] (9122) 209-6600 Canada David Langford [email protected] (612) 9770-1583 Greg MacDonald
    [Show full text]
  • 49807 Bell AIF Eng Clean
    BELL CANADA ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 APRIL 15, 2002 2001 T ABLE OF CONTENTS Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2001 April 15, 2002 Documents Incorporated by Reference . .1 Documents incorporated by reference Part of Annual Information Form in Trade-marks . .1 Document which incorporated by reference Item 1 • Corporate Structure of Bell Canada . .2 Portions of the 2001 Bell Canada Financial Information Item 5 Item 2 • General Development of Bell Canada . .2 Item 3 • Business of Bell Canada . .3 General . .3 Principal Service Area . .5 Subsidiaries and Associated Companies . .5 Regulation . .8 Competition . .12 Capital Expenditures . .15 Environment . .15 Employee Relations . .16 Legal Proceedings . .16 Trade-marks Certain Contracts . .17 Owner Trade-mark Forward-Looking Statements . .18 Bell Canada Rings & Head Design Risk Factors . .18 (Bell Canada corporate logo) Bell Item 4 • Selected Financial Information (Consolidated) . .20 Bell World Item 5 • Management’s Discussion and Analysis . .21 Espace Bell Sympatico Item 6 • Market for the Securities of Bell Canada . .21 Bell ActiMedia Inc. Yellow Pages Item 7 • Directors and Officers of Bell Canada . .21 Bell Mobility Inc. / Bell Mobilité inc. Mobile Browser Item 8 • Additional Information . .23 Manitoba Telecom Services Inc. First Rate Schedule – Directors’ and Officers’ Remuneration . .24 Stentor Resource Centre Inc. / Datapac Centre de ressources Stentor Inc. Megalink SmartTouch AT&T Corp. AT&T MCI Communications Corporation Hyperstream OnStar Corporation Onstar NOTES: (1) Unless the context indicates otherwise, “Bell Canada” refers to Bell Canada and its subsidiaries Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! and associated companies. (2) All dollar figures are in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Telecommunications Policy in Canada
    Australian Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy An Introduction to Telecommunications Policy in Canada Catherine Middleton Ryerson University Abstract: This paper provides an introduction to telecommunications policy in Canada, outlining the regulatory and legislative environment governing the provision of telecommunications services in the country and describing basic characteristics of its retail telecommunications services market. It was written in 2017 as one in a series of papers describing international telecommunications policies and markets published in the Australian Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy in 2016 and 2017. Drawing primarily from regulatory and policy documents, the discussion focuses on broad trends, central policy objectives and major players involved in building and operating Canada’s telecommunications infrastructure. The paper is descriptive rather than evaluative, and does not offer an exhaustive discussion of all telecommunications policy issues, markets and providers in Canada. Keywords: Policy; Telecommunications; Canada Introduction In 2017, Canada’s population was estimated to be above 36.5 million people (Statistics Canada, 2017). Although Canada has a large land mass and low population density, more than 80% of Canadiansi live in urban areas, the majority in close proximity to the border with the United States (Central Intelligence Agency, 2017). Telecommunications services are easily accessible for most, but not all, Canadians. Those in lower-income brackets and/or living in rural and remote areas are less likely to subscribe to telecommunications services than people in urban areas or with higher incomes, and high-quality mobile and Internet services are simply not available in some parts of the country (CRTC, 2017a). On average, Canadian households spend more than $200 (CAD)ii per month to access mobile phone, Internet, television and landline phone services (2015 data, cited in CRTC, 2017a).
    [Show full text]
  • City of Toronto Customized Global Template
    STAFF REPORT June 18, 2001 To: Economic Development Committee From: Joe Halstead, Commissioner Economic Development, Culture and Tourism Subject: South Etobicoke Employer Cluster Capacity Study Etobicoke-Lakeshore - Ward 6 Purpose: The purpose of this report is to provide an overview on the findings and recommendations contained in the South Etobicoke Employer Cluster Capacity Study. Financial Implications and Impact Statement: There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report. Recommendations: It is recommended that: (1) the findings and recommendations of the South Etobicoke Employer Cluster Capacity Study be endorsed by the Economic Development and Parks Committee and Council; (2) this report be forwarded to the Planning and Transportation Committee and Etobicoke Community Council for their information and consideration when reviewing land use options for the New Toronto Secondary Plan; (3) the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism be requested to monitor and report on implementation of the South Etobicoke Employer Cluster Capacity Action Plan; and (4) the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take necessary action to give effect thereto. - 2 - Background: South Etobicoke is located in the southwest quadrant of the City and includes the area south of the Queen Elizabeth Highway to Lake Ontario and west of the Humber River to the Etobicoke Creek, as shown on Attachment No. 1. In 1999, South Etobicoke was identified as an “Employment Revitalization Program Area” and private and public resources (including funds from Human Resources Development Canada) were successfully leveraged to revitalize the area. This initiative has facilitated a collaborative community based process designed to encourage reinvestment in the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Visions of Electric Media Electric of Visions
    TELEVISUAL CULTURE Roberts Visions of Electric Media Ivy Roberts Visions of Electric Media Television in the Victorian and Machine Ages Visions of Electric Media Televisual Culture Televisual culture encompasses and crosses all aspects of television – past, current and future – from its experiential dimensions to its aesthetic strategies, from its technological developments to its crossmedial extensions. The ‘televisual’ names a condition of transformation that is altering the coordinates through which we understand, theorize, intervene, and challenge contemporary media culture. Shifts in production practices, consumption circuits, technologies of distribution and access, and the aesthetic qualities of televisual texts foreground the dynamic place of television in the contemporary media landscape. They demand that we revisit concepts such as liveness, media event, audiences and broadcasting, but also that we theorize new concepts to meet the rapidly changing conditions of the televisual. The series aims at seriously analyzing both the contemporary specificity of the televisual and the challenges uncovered by new developments in technology and theory in an age in which digitization and convergence are redrawing the boundaries of media. Series editors Sudeep Dasgupta, Joke Hermes, Misha Kavka, Jaap Kooijman, Markus Stauff Visions of Electric Media Television in the Victorian and Machine Ages Ivy Roberts Amsterdam University Press Cover illustration: ‘Professor Goaheadison’s Latest,’ Fun, 3 July 1889, 6. Cover design: Coördesign, Leiden
    [Show full text]
  • Communications Network Builders Corporate Profile
    Communications Network Builders Corporate Profile Corporate Profile OUR HISTORY Founded in 1967, TELECON quickly established itself with itsits expertise in burying communication cablecabless and a technical service provider to industry leaders such as BBellellellell Canada. FFFromFrom the startstart,,,, TELECON stood out for ititss commitment to quality workmanshipworkmanship and on time deldeliveries.iveries. In the early 1970’s, TELECON widened its array of servicesservices by adding underground infrastructure construction and utility pole installation servicesservices.. Consequently it obtainobtainedededed thethethe contract to renew the entire aerial network of the Abitibi region installtallinginginging over 600 km of specialized cable. This later led to itsitsits diversification into television cacableble distribution and mandates to deploy communicationcommunication networks across the Province of Quebec. The 90’s wewerere markmarkeded by major technological and core business changeschanges in the teletelecommunicationcommunication industries. ThTheseese opportunities led us into specialized sectors suchsuch as wireless technology, optical networknetworkssss deployment, and switched networks supporting voice data and vivivideovi deo servicesservices.. TELECON is a unique partner, one that mastersmasters alalll the necessary elements for the construction of leading edge telecommunication and electrical netwonetworkrkrkssss.... TELECON services are available from coast to coast, using only qualified and certicertifiedfied personnel
    [Show full text]