J MARX, TROTSKY, LENIN on RUSSIA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

J MARX, TROTSKY, LENIN on RUSSIA Russian Revolution· Anniversary Issue Articles by Marx, Lenin and Trotsky 1, The New-------- '! NTERNATIONAL · I November • 1942 1..... ----- , < ~ j MARX, TROTSKY, LENIN ON RUSSIA 25 Years of the Russian Revolution By Mtlx SlItltlltmtln Stalinist Diplomacy and the War By Aillert 611tes Notes, Archives and Book Revievvs SINGLE COpy 20c ONE YEAR $1.50 THE NEW INTERNATIONAL Hove You Seen tile A Monthly Organ of Reyolutionary Marxism Vol. VIII No. 10, Whole No. 69 Published monthly by NEW INTERNATIONAL Publishing Company, PENNY 114 West 14th Street, New York, N. Y. Telephone: CHelsea 2-9681. Subscription rates: $1..50 per year; bundles, 14C for 5 copies and up. Canada and foreign: $1.75 per year; bundles, 16c for 5 and up. Entered as second-class matter July 10, 1940, at the post office at New York, N. Y., under the act of March 3, 1879, Editor: ALBERT GATES lAB 0 R TABLE OF CONTENTS: Articles: 25 YEARS OF THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION ACTION By Max S hac h tman ___________________________________________ 29 1 MARX, TROTSKY AND LENIN ON RUSSIA By M. S. ______________________________________________________ ------- 296 THE MARX-ZASULICH CORRESPONDENCE -it's better By Karl Marx and Vera Zasulich ______________________ 298 thlln ever- SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT OF RUSSIA By Leon Trotsky ________________________________________________ 302 LENIN AT THE ELEVENTH CONGRESS featuring stories on By N. Len in -------------------------------------------------------- 30 5 STALINIST DIPLOMACY AND THE WAR WAR By A Ibert Gates -------------------------------------------------- 30 9 LABOR Notes of the Month: AN ANSWER TO STALINIST CRITICS-II NEGROES By Leon Trotsky ---------------------------------------------- 313 WORLD NEWS Books in RevIew: BEHIND RUSSIA'S WAR FRONT Editorial Comment By Mary Cas t ing ----------------------------------------------- 3 18 TRUTH A LA WEBBS Subscribe NOW! By E. Garrett ------------------------------------------------------ 320 N am e______________________________________________________ -----. Address _____________________________________________ _____________ ---- Because the current issue has been devoted entirely to the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Russian Revolution, the dis­ cussion on the national question will be carried in the De­ City ___________________________________ ________ S tat e _. __________________ ._ cember number. The December issue will also contain a report on the trade RATES: 60 Cents a Year. $1.00 in Canada, union situation in the country by David Coolidge, who at­ Foreign and New York City tended the UMWA and CIO conventions. The final install­ ment, "China in the War," by Max Shachtman, will also ap­ pear, as well as special articles, archives and book reviews. THE NEW INTERNATIONAL A Monthly Organ of Revolutionary Marxism VOLUME VIII NOVEMBER, 1942 NUMBER 10 25 Years of the Russian Revolution A Critical AppraisaL I t is hard to believe that twenty-five society that Lenin postponed for at least two generations, it years have passed since the Bolshevik Revolution. A quarter has long ago been achieved, according to Stalin. of a century, measured in terms of world history, is only a mo­ The predictions seem to have been refuted. But only ment, to be sure. But people do not live in terms of world "seem." The reality is different, fundamentally different, from history. They live and struggle for existence in terms of their the appearance. With hardly an exception the forecasts of the most authentic leaders of the revolution, Lenin and Trot­ own time; at most, of yesterday, today and tomOrrow. And sky, proved to be clairvoyant, and the elapsed quarter of a measured in these terms-above all when it is remembered century has confirmed them, some of them tragically, some of that in our time events crowd each other with a speed utterly them in a unique and unexpected way. unknown in earlier epochs-a quarter of a century is a long What has happened since 1917? Why did it happen? What time. does it signify? So much has happened in these twenty-five years that The first question is sooner answered than the second; the seems to refute the claims and predictions of the men who led second sooner than the third. the revolution and the regime created by it. We will create The regime established by the Bolshevik revolution no an entirely new type of state, a state which, properly speak­ longer exists. The mastery of the workers in the factories has ing, is no longer a state because from the day of its establish­ been abolished. The factory councils are a half-forgotten ment it is already in the process of dying out, said Lenin on memory. The trade unions, the school of communism under the eve of the Bolshevik seizure of power. Yet the state in Lenin, and the protector of the workers' interests even from Russia today is the most despotic and oppressive the country the state itself, have become police institutions in the factories, ever knew, one might almost say the world ever knew. organizing and carrying through an exploitation of labor Now we proceed to lay the foundations of socialism, were whose intensity would not be tolerated by a half-decent union the simple words with which Lenin concluded his first public under capitalism. The worker is now chained to his job and appearance after the revolution freed him from Kerensky's may not leave it without police permission, and the system is illegality. But if someone had set out deliberately to elaborate even more universally and rigidly enforced than in Germany a wickedly malicious caricature of socialism, a social monstros­ One critical word from the worker, and he finds himself on ity in which labor enjoys neither the fruits of its toil nor the the street, with an even worse fate possible. invigorating air of liberty, he could hardly have improved The peasant is in little better position, if at all. His mas­ upon present Russian society. ter is no longer the feudal landlord or the fiscal agent of the We count firmly on the world revolution, on the state aid Czar. In their place is an arrogant, all-powerful, all-devouring of the workers of the advanced countries of the West, for we bureaucrat, imposed from above, unconcerned with the wel­ tell you openly that without it we shall surely perish. We are fare of the peasantry, fraternizing with the well-to-do farmers nothing but a beleagured fortress, which we can hold for any (the "millionaire kolkhozniki") if with anyone, but inter­ length of time only if the revolution is victorious in the other ested above all in seeing to it that the agricultural popUlation countries. Between our revolution and the capitalist world, meets or exceeds the productive demands made upon it by the there is no possibility of reconciliation, no possibility of peace­ new rulers of society. There is no resemblance here with that ful coexistence.-Thus spake Lenin and Trotsky and all the smychka, that alliance between worker and peasant, which other leaders of the revolution, not once but time and again. Lenin considered indispensable for the maintenance of the Yet, although the world revolution which did break out in Soviet state. Europe turned out to be a failure, the rule of the bourgeoisie For that matter, the Soviet state no longer exists either. was not restored in Russia. The omnipresent bureaucratic machine exists, but not the We may have socialism in Russia in the days of our grand­ Soviets. There is more significance in Hitler's occasional con­ children, said Lenin. A real rise in socialist economy can be vocations of what he continues to call the Reichstag than in expected only after the revolution in other countries, wrote Stalin's less occasional convocations of what is constitution­ Trotsky. Yet, the revolution in other countries failed to tri­ ally the supreme legislative and executive body of the coun­ umph and Russia nevertheless experienced a tremendous and try, the two upper Soviet houses. For that matter, it would unforeseen development of its economy. As for the socialist not make a particle of difference if they met twelve hours of every day. They are nothing but a m~gaphone of Stalin's than once sent its forces abroad to suppress it. In deceit, not Political Bureau. The way in which they were elected be­ toward its diplomatic counterparts but toward the people of came an international joke for the simple reason that they its own and other countries, in behind-the-scenes trIckery and were not really elected by their constituents, they were ap­ secrecy, in cold-blooded pacts with capitalist imperialism for pointed by the machine. Elections to the Soviet, once tangible the division of loot, it yields to few, if any, predecessors or evidence of the people's control of their political representa­ contemporaries. tives, once tangible evidence that with all its shortcomings All that was done by Lenin and Trotsky in the decisive the Soviet system was a thousand times more democratic than field of nationalities-decisive especially for Russia, which the most democratic of capitalist parliamentary systems, now under Czarism was a great prison of national minorities-has have less significance than a senatorial election in Mississippi been undone by the new regime. The peripheral republics of -much, much less. the Union, the non-Russian peoples, are treated with that The Bolshevik Party, indispensable element, principal ele­ truly Great-Russian chauvinism, that imperial Muscovite con­ ment of workers' rule in Soviet Russia, has been destroyed root tempt, which Lenin observed in Stalin more than twenty years and branch. Hitler has not yet succeeded in crushing the revo­ ago. That apparently personal trait of the one bureaucrat is lutionary Marxist movement with the same thoroughness dis­ now an essential characteristic of the whole ruling bureau­ played by Stalin. As for the Czarist Okhrana, it was like a cracy. The latter, from its Vozhd on down, has not even hesi­ town constable compared with the OGPU.
Recommended publications
  • Lenin and the Bourgeois Press
    REQUEST TO READERS Progress Publishers would be glad to have your opinion of this book, its translation and design and any suggestions you may have for future publications. Please send your comments to 17, Zubovsky Boulevard, Moscow, U.S,S.R. Boris Baluyev AND TBE BOURGEOIS PRESS Progress Publishers Moscow Translated from the Russian by James Riordan Designed by Yuri Davydov 6opac 6aJiyee JIEHMH IlOJIEMl1311PYET C 6YJ>)l(YA3HO'A IlPECCO'A Ha Qlj2J1UUCKOM 11301Ke © IlOJIHTH3L(aT, 1977 English translation © Progress Publishers 1983 Printed in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics 0102020000-346 _ E 32 83 014(01)-83 Contents Introduction . 5 "Highly Interesting-from the Negative Aspect" 8 "Capitalism and the Press" . 23 "For Lack of a Clean Principled Weapon They Snatch at a Dirty One" . 53 "I Would Rather Let Myself Be Drawn and Quartered... " 71 "A Socialist Paper Must Carry on Polemics" 84 "But What Do These Facts Mean?" . 98 "All Praise to You, Writers for Rech and Duma!" 106 "Our Strength Lies in Stating the Truth!" 120 "The Despicable Kind of Trick People Who Have Been Ordered to Raise a Cheer Would Use" . 141 "The Innumerable Vassal Organs of Russian Liberalism" 161 "This Appeared Not in Novoye Vremya, but in a Paper That Calls Itself a Workers' Newspaper" . 184 ··one Chorus. One Orchestra·· 201 INTRODUCTION The polemical writings of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin continue to set an unsurpassed standard of excellence for journalists and all representatives of the progressive press. They teach ideo­ logical consistency and develop the ability to link political issues of the moment to Marxist philosophical theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Communist Manifesto”
    IN THE VANGUARD OF REVOLUTIONARY ACTION: THE FIRST RUSSIAN EDITIONS OF THE “COMMUNIST MANIFESTO” 1. The story behind the first Russian translation of the “Communist Manifesto” is rather enigmatic. It was published without indicating not only the authors or the editor and the printer, but also without a title page, publication date or place of publication. The publication of it was quite a surprise to Marx, who wrote to Engels (29.04.1870): Finally, ONE COPY of the Russian translation of our Communist Manifesto for you. I saw in the Werker, etc., that the Kolokol Publishing House, which was willed to Bakunin, also includes ‘this stuff’, so ordered 6 copies from Geneva. It's very interesting for us.1 The information about this edition appeared also in Marx and Engels’ preface to the second edition, where they claim that it was translated by Bakunin and published early in the “’sixties by the printing office of the Kolokol”2. Nevertheless, this information is questionable. One must remember that Marx and Engels were not exactly precise with such details. It is a well-known fact that Engels, for example, wrongly attributed the 1882 translation to Vera Zasulich and not Plekhanov in the preface to the German edition in 1890. We know for sure that the text was printed in Geneva by Ludwig Czerniecki. This can be verified not only because the paper and fonts match those from “Kolokol” of 15 February 18693; it is also confirmed in the correspondence between the printer and Nikolai Ogarev. It was published by Volnaya Russkaya Tipographiya4, probably in September 1869.
    [Show full text]
  • Coversheet for Thesis in Sussex Research Online
    A University of Sussex DPhil thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://eprints.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details Lenin and the Iskra Faction of the RSDLP 1899-1903 Richard Mullin Doctor of Philosophy Resubmission University of Sussex March 2010 1 I hereby declare that this thesis has not been submitted in whole or in part to another University for the award of any other degree ……………………………….. 2 Contents Contents.......................................................................................................................3 Acknowledgements……………..…………………………………………………...4 Abstract........................................................................................................................5 Notes on Names, Texts and Dates…….....……………………..…………………...6 Chapter One: Historical and Historiographical Context…………………..…....7 i) 1899-1903 in the Context of Russian Social-Democratic History and Theory …12 ii) Historiographical Trends in the Study of Lenin and the RSDLP …………...…..23 iii) How the thesis develops
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction 11. I Have Approached This Subject in Greater Detail in J. D
    NOTES Introduction 11. I have approached this subject in greater detail in J. D. White, Karl Marx and the Intellectual Origins of Dialectical Materialism (Basingstoke and London, 1996). 12. V. I. Lenin, Collected Works, Vol. 38, p. 180. 13. K. Marx, Grundrisse, translated by M. Nicolaus (Harmondsworth, 1973), p. 408. 14. N. I. Ziber, Teoriia tsennosti i kapitala D. Rikardo v sviazi s pozdneishimi dopolneniiami i raz"iasneniiami. Opyt kritiko-ekonomicheskogo issledovaniia (Kiev, 1871). 15. N. G. Chernyshevskii, ‘Dopolnenie i primechaniia na pervuiu knigu politicheskoi ekonomii Dzhon Stiuarta Millia’, Sochineniia N. Chernyshevskogo, Vol. 3 (Geneva, 1869); ‘Ocherki iz politicheskoi ekonomii (po Milliu)’, Sochineniia N. Chernyshevskogo, Vol. 4 (Geneva, 1870). Reprinted in N. G. Chernyshevskii, Polnoe sobranie sochineniy, Vol. IX (Moscow, 1949). 16. Arkhiv K. Marksa i F. Engel'sa, Vols XI–XVI. 17. M. M. Kovalevskii, Obshchinnoe zemlevladenie, prichiny, khod i posledstviia ego razlozheniia (Moscow, 1879). 18. Marx to the editorial board of Otechestvennye zapiski, November 1877, in Karl Marx Frederick Engels Collected Works, Vol. 24, pp. 196–201. 19. Marx to Zasulich, 8 March 1881, in Karl Marx Frederick Engels Collected Works, Vol. 24, pp. 346–73. 10. It was published in the journal Vestnik Narodnoi Voli, no. 5 (1886). 11. D. Riazanov, ‘V Zasulich i K. Marks’, Arkhiv K. Marksa i F. Engel'sa, Vol. 1 (1924), pp. 269–86. 12. N. F. Daniel'son, ‘Ocherki nashego poreformennogo obshch- estvennogo khoziaistva’, Slovo, no. 10 (October 1880), pp. 77–143. 13. N. F. Daniel'son, Ocherki nashego poreformennogo obshchestvennogo khozi- aistva (St Petersburg, 1893). 14. V. V. Vorontsov, Sud'by kapitalizma v Rossii (St Petersburg, 1882).
    [Show full text]
  • THE RISE and FALL of the BLACK HUNDRED by Jacob Langer Department of History Duke Univers
    CORRUPTION AND THE COUNTERREVOLUTION: THE RISE AND FALL OF THE BLACK HUNDRED by Jacob Langer Department of History Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Marty Miller, Supervisor ___________________________ Donald Raleigh ___________________________ Warren Lerner ___________________________ Alex Roland Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of Duke University 2007 ABSTRACT CORRUPTION AND THE COUNTERREVOLUTION: THE RISE AND FALL OF THE BLACK HUNDRED by Jacob Langer Department of History Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Marty Miller, Supervisor ___________________________ Donald Raleigh ___________________________ Warren Lerner ___________________________ Alex Roland An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of Duke University 2007 Copyright by Jacob Langer 2007 Abstract This dissertation analyzes the ideology and activities of the Black Hundred movement at the end of the Imperial period in Russia (1905-1917). It seeks to explain the reasons for the sudden, rapid expansion of Black Hundred organizations in 1905, as well as the causes of their decline, which began just two years after their appearance. It further attempts to elucidate the complex relationship between the Black Hundred and Russian authorities, including the central government and local officials. The problem is approached by offering two distinct perspectives on the Black Hundred. First, a broad overview of the movement is presented. The focus here is on the headquarter branches of Black Hundred organizations in St. Petersburg, but these chapters also look at the activities of many different provincial branches, relating trends in the provinces to events in the center in order to draw conclusions about the nature of the overall movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Stalin: from Terrorism to State Terror, 1905-1939 Matthew Alw Z St
    St. Cloud State University theRepository at St. Cloud State Culminating Projects in History Department of History 5-2017 Stalin: From Terrorism to State Terror, 1905-1939 Matthew alW z St. Cloud State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/hist_etds Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Walz, Matthew, "Stalin: From Terrorism to State Terror, 1905-1939" (2017). Culminating Projects in History. 10. https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/hist_etds/10 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at theRepository at St. Cloud State. It has been accepted for inclusion in Culminating Projects in History by an authorized administrator of theRepository at St. Cloud State. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Stalin: From Terrorism to State Terror, 1905-1939 by Matthew Walz A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of St. Cloud State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in History May, 2017 Thesis Committee: Marie Seong-Hak Kim, Chairperson Mary Wingerd Edward Greaves Plamen Miltenoff 2 Abstract While scholars continue to debate the manner in which the Great Terror took shape in the Soviet Union, Stalin’s education as a revolutionary terrorist leader from 1905-1908 is often overlooked as a causal feature. This thesis analyzes the parallels between the revolutionary terrorists in Russia in the first decade of the twentieth century, particularly within Stalin’s Red Brigade units, and the henchmen carrying out the Great Terror of the 1930s. Both shared characteristics of loyalty, ruthlessness and adventurism while for the most part lacking any formal education and existing in a world of paranoia.
    [Show full text]
  • Leon Trotsky and World War One: August 1914-March 1917
    Leon Trotsky and World War One: August 1914-March 1917 by Ian Dennis Thatcher A thesis submitted in partial requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Institute of Soviet and East European Studies, Glasgow University, September 1993. © Ian Dennis Thatcher, Glasgow, September 1993. ProQuest Number: 13833808 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 13833808 Published by ProQuest LLC(2019). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 GLASGOW UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Abstract This thesis is the first full account of Trotsky's writings penned between August 1914 and March 1917. The source material used is almost exclusively primary, both published and archival, some of which is examined here for the first time. Each of Trotsky's concerns as a thinker and publicist is illustrated, and each debate followed to its conclusion. The main findings of this thesis are as follows. Trotsky's analysis of the causes of the war and his programmatic response to it were logical and consistent. Second, although he hoped to unite all internationalists around his war programme, differences of opinion with the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks meant that his plans on this issue remained unfulfilled.
    [Show full text]
  • Collected Works of VI Lenin
    W O R K E R S O F A L L C O U N T R I E S , U N I T E! L E N I N COLLECTED WORKS 43 A THE RUSSIAN EDITION WAS PRINTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH A DECISION OF THE NINTH CONGRESS OF THE R.C.P.(B.) AND THE SECOND CONGRESS OF SOVIETS OF THE U.S.S.R. ИНCTИTУT МАРÇCИзМА — ЛЕНИНИзМА пpи ЦK KНCC B. n. l d H n H С О Ч И Н E Н И Я И з д a н u е ч е m в е p m o e ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЕ ИЗДАТЕЛЬСТВО ПОЛИТИЧЕСКОЙ ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ M О С К В А V. I. L E N I N cOLLEcTED WORKS VOLUME 43 December 18o3 –October 1o17 PROGRESS PUBLISHERS MOSCOW TRANSLATED FROM THE RUSSIAN BY MARTIN PARKER AND BERNARD ISAACS From Marx to Mao M L © Digital Reprints 2014 www.marx2mao.com First printing 1969 Second printing 1971 Third printing 1977 10102—212 л беэ объявл. 014 (01)—77 7 C O N T E N T S Page Preface ........................ 29 1893 1. TO P. P. MASLOV. Second half of December ....... 37 1894 2. TO P. P. MASLOV. May 30 .............. 39 3. TO P. P. MASLOV. May 31 .............. 42 4. TO L. F. MILOVIDOVA. July ?1 ............ 42 1900 5. TO Y. M. STEKLOV. September ? 5 ........... 44 6. TO D. B. RYAZANOV. September ? 5 .......... 45 7. TO V. P. NOGIN. October 10 ............. 45 8. TO Y. M. STEKLOV. October 10 ............ 46 9. TO APOLLINARIA YAKUBOVA. October ?6 ........ 47 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Turn of Century
    62 WAS THE 1905 REVOLUTION A PRODUCT OF RUSSIA AS A 'DEVELOPING SOCIETY'? A CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF TEODOR SHANIN's THE ROOTS OF OTHERNESS; RUSSIA'S TURN OF CENTURY Zdenko Zlatar "Die, if necessary, for the preservation of the equal right of every peasant to land-­ die for the communal principle." Alexander Herzen, The Bell (1859) "The Western precedent would prove here nothing at all .. .' Karl Marx, 2nd Draft of his Letter to Vera Zasulich (1881) "They cannot represent themselves, they must be represented." Karl Marx, The 18th Brumaire of Louis Napoleon Within the short parameters of this modest paper it is impossible to do justice to the scope and comprehensiveness of Teodor Shanin's latest work. This two-volume work is a very significant contribution to the study of both early twentieth-century Russia in general, and of the role of the peasantry in the 1905 revolution in particular. Accordingly, I can touch here briefly only upon his central thesis, namely that the 1905 revolution (the subject of his second volume) was the product of Russia as a 'developing society' (the topic of his first volume).! First, it should be pointed out that Shanin's two-volume work is not a restatement of accepted orthodoxies of whatever kind, liberal, conservative or Marxist. His study is a revisionist piece of work of a high order, and, therefore, if I take issue with his thesis that does not mean that I do not have a very high regard for many, indeed most, of the finer points raised by his book. It is indeed my contention that his own critique of the dominant historiographical positions makes the acceptance of his own rather simplistic view, as I see it, that he puts forward, highly unlikely.
    [Show full text]
  • The Image of Jesus in the Russian Revolutionary Movement the Case of Russian Marxism*
    JAY BERGMAN THE IMAGE OF JESUS IN THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTIONARY MOVEMENT THE CASE OF RUSSIAN MARXISM* SUMMARY: This article explores how Russian revolutionaries, in particular the Russian Marxists, used the image of Jesus to explain their political choices and commitments. These revolutionaries were almost uniformly hostile to institutional Christianity. Yet a number of Russian Marxists, such as Anatolii Lunacharskii, considered Jesus a genuine precursor of socialism. In 1917 many Bolsheviks and Bolshevik sympathizers interpreted the October Revolution in Christian terms, principally as a spiritual resurrection and rebirth. And in 1924, following Lenin's death, some Bolsheviks analogized Lenin to Jesus, and claimed that both were revolutionary martyrs. Finally, the article argues that Russian revolutionaries in- vested the Russian lower classes with a Christlike virtue, making it easier for the revolutionaries, once in power, to justify everything they did as advancing the interests of these classes. It is often said that the Russian revolutionary movement professed values that are, in the broadest sense of the word, religious. The emphasis on the perfectibility of man and on the moral transformation of the individual, the glorification of self-sacrifice and martyrdom, the belief in a Golden Age at the end of history bringing with it collective regeneration and rebirth - all these attributes of Russian radical politics from roughly 1840 to 1930 attest to the influence of religious values, if not of religious beliefs, in the devel- opment of revolutionary ideology. Indeed, one may speak of the Marxist scheme of history, which had special appeal in Russia beginning in the 1890's, as following in many significant respects the scenario of Christian- ity.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgii Plekhanov and the Communist Manifesto: the Proletarian Revolution Revisited Van Ree, E
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Georgii Plekhanov and the Communist Manifesto: the proletarian revolution revisited van Ree, E. DOI 10.1080/09546545.2013.787807 Publication date 2013 Document Version Final published version Published in Revolutionary Russia Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): van Ree, E. (2013). Georgii Plekhanov and the Communist Manifesto: the proletarian revolution revisited. Revolutionary Russia, 26(1), 32-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546545.2013.787807 General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:24 Sep 2021 This article was downloaded by: [UVA Universiteitsbibliotheek SZ] On: 26 June 2013, At: 06:12 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Revolutionary Russia Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/frvr20 Georgii Plekhanov and the Communist Manifesto: the Proletarian Revolution Revisited Erik van Ree Published online: 26 Jun 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emerging Women of the Russian Revolution
    The Emerging Women of the Russian Revolution Jessica De La O After generations of oppression, nineteenth-century Russia experienced a turning point in both the role of women and the use of rebellion as a vehicle for change. While civil disruption was common amongst the female citizenry, the height of it came as a direct result of the emancipation of the Russian peasantry in 1861 and the 1881 assassination of Czar Alexander II. Amidst the chaos, questions about the actions of these new emerging women produced new perspectives on gender and radicalism, embodied in new forms of female agency. Historians now understand the revolutionary woman less as a result of noble efforts and more as a product of a process where women chose to shed their traditional roles and become rebels. Scholars have studied the revolutionary woman, but historians have overlooked overlaps of motive, action, consequence, and change amongst this group of actors. A comparative analysis of the women who sought change in Russia through terrorism, education, and writing, this study demonstrates that the long-term impact of more violent acts often overshadowed more peaceful efforts for change. It also shows how these women––and their divergent approaches to revolution––intertwined. The study of revolutionary women in the late nineteenth century is a major part of Russian history. Autobiographies, memoirs, letters, and official documents demonstrating women’s perspectives have contributed to scholarship on the twentieth- century Bolshevik Movement.1 1 Barbara Alpern Engel,
    [Show full text]