PALESTINE: REVERSING ETHNIC CLEANSING Salman Abu Sitta

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PALESTINE: REVERSING ETHNIC CLEANSING Salman Abu Sitta PALESTINE: REVERSING ETHNIC CLEANSING Salman Abu Sitta AUB Thursday 14 Jan 2010 Today you are witnessing one more day in the longest war in history waged against a people, the Palestinians. It is now 92 years since the last western colonial project, initiated by Balfour and Weizmann, was planted in Palestine. It only succeeded in sowing death and destruction since then. Never in its 5000 years history has Palestine witnessed such massive uprooting of its people, ethnically cleansing of 675 towns and villages, such massive dispossession and confiscation of property, 93% of Israel’s area is Palestinian property, so are the contents of its towns and village, public buildings, roads, railways, ports and of course, its water resources. Never before has Palestine witnessed such massive destruction of its landscape, its cultural and religious monuments and its landmarks. Never before has Palestine witnessed such erasure of its history, identity, its Arabic and Palestinian names and its heritage. Never before has Palestinee been th subject of so many UN resolutions condemning these crimes and deeds and calling for removing this colossal injustice, with absolutely nothing done about it. The victims of this injustice are 11 million Palestinians of whom 7 million are refugees and displaced people, including 4.7 million registered refugees. They are languishing in exile while Jewish European immigrants are enjoying the fruits of their conquest, looting and plunder. But this unprecedented catastrophic event has a peculiar characteristic: It is like a constantly‐running play. The players change, but the same story goes on and on. If you missed all events since WWI, you must have seen the carnage in Gaza last January. This is the latest replica of past events. Let us look back for a minute at the beginnings. The opening scene finds Herzl in 1903 approaching his lawyer to draft for him the charter for the first Jewish colonial project by the name of the “Jewish Colonization Trust” in East Africa. The lawyer was none other than David Lloyd George. The British found the project too ambitious and probably threatening to imperial interests, so they turned it down. In 1904 a professor of chemistry, Haim Weizmann, befriended his MP AUB lecture 14 Jan 2010 date print 11/01/2010 1/12 by the name of James Arthur Balfour and introduced him to Zionism. In 1917, that same Lloyd George became Britain’s Prime Minister and Balfour became its Foreign Secretary. Together with Weizmann, they redrafted the old colonial document. It became known as Balfour Declaration. It was the last, and the only surviving, colonial project today. Scene 2: Finds the Allied planes dropping leaflets on Bilad ash Sham in the summer of 1916 promising the Arabs full independence as soon as they both defeat the Turks. At the very same time, a man who lived a long time here in Beirut and a young rich English aristocrat huddled in a room, with drawn curtains, and with a map of the Middle East before them. Thus George Picot got the piece of cake called north Syria, i.e. present Syria, and Lebanon and Mark Sykes got Palestine and Iraq. Since then, we are painted as Palestinians, and you as Lebanese and a little to the east, Syrians. Any villager in any one of these regions at that time would be baffled by this new designation. This treachery and betrayal by those diplomats, wearing top hats and exchanging polite conversation over dinner table, had to be dressed up in a civilized legal garb. They found the way. In the wake of WWI, The League of Nations bestowed upon Palestine its “Sacred Trust of Civilization” by which Palestine was put under Mandate class A; that is, it is fit for independence as soon as the Mandatory power, Britain, would finish its task of helping Palestine to build its institutions. This task is not finished till today and Palestine remains under the guardianship of the United Nations and its responsibility. Why was not the task finished after 92 years? It is because those powers who promised applying the “Sacred Trust of Civilization” are the same who betrayed it. The guardian became the villain. As a result, the Palestinian people suffered the loss of their patrimony and independence. The Mandatory Power, Britain, represented by Herbert Samuel, the Zionist first High Commissioner in Palestine, established in his first term, 1920‐1925, the legal foundation of the components of the State of Israel. Moreover, in the following 28 years, the British Mandate allowed Jewish European immigrants into Palestine, thereby increasing Jewish population from 9% to 30% of total population. More ominously, Zionist Jews built an army of 120,000 soldiers by the end of the Mandate, or 20% of all Jews, which is 15 times the ratio in any country. This number of soldiers is comparable to the American forces in vastly bigger Afghanistan. In 1948, they bounced on Palestine and carried out the largest, longest, pre‐planned and continuous ethnic cleansing operation in modern history. That was al Nakba. Slide (2‐23): Al Nakba Anatomy (30 sec). The blue areas are lands acquired by the Jewish immigrants during the Mandate to the tune of 5% of Palestine. The red areas are conquered Palestinian land. AUB lecture 14 Jan 2010 date print 11/01/2010 2/12 The flashing points are massacres. On 15 May 1948, when he declared his state, Ben Gurion was in control only of 13% of Palestine. Zionist militias committed one half of the massacres in this period, while the British were looking. The Israeli conquest went on. Seven thousand square kilometers in the south were occupied by Israel after it signed the Armistice Agreement with Egypt. Within six months Israel occupied 78% of Palestine. This shows the occupied land. What about the people? Slide 24 (Fig 3.1 animated) – 4 layers. The first thing Ben Gurion did was to expel the Palestinian citizens of the state he planned to establish. This is called ethnic cleansing. Half of all refugees were expelled before the state was established, while the British were watching, not rising to their obligations. That is before any Arab soldier entered Palestine to prevent expulsion and massacres. This explodes the myth that Israel was in self‐defence. The expulsion went on. 675 towns and villages were depopulated. Every expulsion was correlated with an Israeli military operation of conquest. When there was truce, no body left, as you can see from the yellow line. If they left on Arab orders, the truce or the lull in fighting would have been a good time to pack and leave but they did not, as you can see in the flat green curve. This explodes the myth that exodus was not initiated by the Israelis. A damning proof is the occurrence of over 70 massacres. Every Israeli operation was accompanied by one or more massacres. As you can see these massacres coincided with the exodus and the military operation. In the end, 900,000 refugees lost their homes. Al Nakba can be seen in its graphic form. (slide 25 – 4 layers). Every depopulated village was surrounded from three sides, leaving the fourth for expulsion. (slide 26). Today, 11 million Palestinians are waiting for their patrimony and freedom. They are scattered around the world, but mercifully 88% of them are in and around Palestine. (slide 27). About half of them are in the three regions of Palestine. A distinguished man of peace who saw this tragedy and understood its dimensions was Count Folke Bernadotte, the UN Mediator in Palestine. Jewish terrorists assassinated him on the day of his final report. They were too late. His report and his legacy became the corner stone of the famous UN resolution 194. This resolution, affirmed by the international community over 130 times, more than any resolution in UN history, has three main components: 1. It calls for the return of the refugees and their compensation. 2. It calls for their relief and assistance until they are repatriated. AUB lecture 14 Jan 2010 date print 11/01/2010 3/12 3. It creates the mechanism for the resolution’s implementation, the UN Conciliation Commission for Palestine, UNCCP. Resolution 194 was the central pillar of international law. It was, over the years, the fundamental demand of the refugees. I would like to read for you a paragraph, from a letter I found in Philadelphia archives, sent by a field officer in Gaza of the American Friends Service Committee (the Quakers), one of the first relief organizations to come to the assistance of the Palestinian refugees. His letter to his Philadelphia head‐office was dated October 12, 1949; a mere 12 months after al Nakba: They [the refugees] feel strongly that the United Nations are responsible for their plight and therefore have the total responsibility to feed, house, clothe and repatriate them...... Above all else, they desire to go home – back to their lands and villages which in many cases are very close... Without it, they would have nothing for which to live.... It is as genuine and deep as a man’s longing for his home can be. Today 62 years later this very same message is still echoed by the sons and grandsons of the refugees. What happened to the Palestinian patrimony, to the empty landscape, to the depopulated towns and villages? Josef Weitz, the chief official of the Jewish National Fund (JNF) behind land grabbing and people’s expulsion, visited the depopulated Galilee in the autumn of 1948, immediately after expulsion, and wrote those poetic words: And as the road continues over mountains, the Galilee is revealed to me in its splendor, its hidden places and folds, its crimson smile and its green softness and its desolation.
Recommended publications
  • Palestinian Refugees: Adiscussion ·Paper
    Palestinian Refugees: ADiscussion ·Paper Prepared by Dr. Jan Abu Shakrah for The Middle East Program/ Peacebuilding Unit American Friends Service Committee l ! ) I I I ' I I I I I : Contents Preface ................................................................................................... Prologue.................................................................................................. 1 Introduction . .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2 The Creation of the Palestinian Refugee Problem .. .. .. .. .. 3 • Identifying Palestinian Refugees • Counting Palestinian Refugees • Current Location and Living Conditions of the Refugees Principles: The International Legal Framework .... .. ... .. .. ..... .. .. ....... ........... 9 • United Nations Resolutions Specific to Palestinian Refugees • Special Status of Palestinian Refugees in International Law • Challenges to the International Legal Framework Proposals for Resolution of the Refugee Problem ...................................... 15 • The Refugees in the Context of the Middle East Peace Process • Proposed Solutions and Principles Espoused by Israelis and Palestinians Return Statehood Compensation Resettlement Work of non-governmental organizations................................................. 26 • Awareness-Building and Advocacy Work • Humanitarian Assistance and Development • Solidarity With Right of Return and Restitution Conclusion .... ..... ..... ......... ... ....... ..... ....... ....... ....... ... ......... .. .. ... .. ............
    [Show full text]
  • The Nakba: 70 Years ON
    May 2018 Photo: Abed Rahim Khatib Photo: A I THE NAKBA: 70 YEARS ON 70 Years of Dispossession, Displacement and Denial of Rights, but also ASS 70 Years of Steadfastness, Self-Respect and Struggle for Freedom and Justice P INTRODUCTION 2018 is the year where Palestinians all over the world remember the 70th anniversary of the Nakba - 70 Years in which they had their civil and national rights trampled on, sacrificed lives and livelihoods, had their land stolen, their property destroyed, promises broken, were injured, insulted and humiliated, endured oppression, dispersion, imprisonment and torture, and witnessed numerous attempts to partition their homeland and divide their people. However, despite all past and ongoing land confiscation, settlement construction, forcible displacements and rights denials, the Zionist movement has failed to empty the country of its indigenous Palestinian inhabitants, whose number has meanwhile increased to an extent that it is about to exceed that of the Jews. Despite all repressions at the hands of the occupier, despite all attempts at erasing or distorting their history and memory, and despite all political setbacks and failed negotiations, Palestinians are still steadfast on their land and resisting occupation. The 1948 Nakba remains the root cause of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and will continue to fuel the Palestinian struggle for freedom and self-determination. As clearly reflected in the ‘Great March of Return’ which began on 30 March 2018 along the Gaza border fence, the Palestinians will not relinquish their historical and legal right of return to their homeland nor their demand that Israel acknowledges Contents: its moral and political responsibility for this ongoing tragedy and the gross injustice inflicted on the Palestinian people.
    [Show full text]
  • CEPS Middle East & Euro-Med Project
    CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN POLICY WORKING PAPER NO. 6 STUDIES JULY 2003 Searching for Solutions PALESTINIAN REFUGEES HOW CAN A DURABLE SOLUTION BE ACHIEVED? TANJA SALEM This Working Paper is published by the CEPS Middle East and Euro-Med Project. The project addresses issues of policy and strategy of the European Union in relation to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the wider issues of EU relations with the countries of the Barcelona Process and the Arab world. Participants in the project include independent experts from the region and the European Union, as well as a core team at CEPS in Brussels led by Michael Emerson and Nathalie Tocci. Support for the project is gratefully acknowledged from: • Compagnia di San Paolo, Torino • Department for International Development (DFID), London. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed are attributable only to the author in a personal capacity and not to any institution with which he is associated. ISBN 92-9079-429-1 CEPS Middle East & Euro-Med Project Available for free downloading from the CEPS website (http://www.ceps.be) Copyright 2003, CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies Place du Congrès 1 • B-1000 Brussels • Tel: (32.2) 229.39.11 • Fax: (32.2) 219.41.41 e-mail: [email protected] • website: http://www.ceps.be CONTENTS 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Background.....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rights in Principle – Rights in Practice, Revisiting the Role of International Law in Crafting Durable Solutions
    Rights in Principle - Rights in Practice Revisiting the Role of International Law in Crafting Durable Solutions for Palestinian Refugees Terry Rempel, Editor BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency & Refugee Rights, Bethlehem RIGHTS IN PRINCIPLE - RIGHTS IN PRACTICE REVISITING THE ROLE OF InternatiONAL LAW IN CRAFTING DURABLE SOLUTIONS FOR PALESTINIAN REFUGEES Editor: Terry Rempel xiv 482 pages. 24 cm ISBN 978-9950-339-23-1 1- Palestinian Refugees 2– Palestinian Internally Displaced Persons 3- International Law 4– Land and Property Restitution 5- International Protection 6- Rights Based Approach 7- Peace Making 8- Public Participation HV640.5.P36R53 2009 Cover Photo: Snapshots from «Go and See Visits», South Africa, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cyprus and Palestine (© BADIL) Copy edit: Venetia Rainey Design: BADIL Printing: Safad Advertising All rights reserved © BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency & Refugee Rights December 2009 P.O. Box 728 Bethlehem, Palestine Tel/Fax: +970 - 2 - 274 - 7346 Tel: +970 - 2 - 277 - 7086 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.badil.org iii CONTENTS Abbreviations ....................................................................................vii Contributors ......................................................................................ix Foreword ..........................................................................................xi Foreword .........................................................................................xiv Introduction ......................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • When the Carob Tree Was the Border
    When the Carob Tree Was the Border: On autonomy and Palestinian practices of figuring it out† Linda Quiquivix* Introduction “How did they know where the borders were?” I ask, “If people didn’t have maps, how did they know?” Ahmed Al-Noubani opens his arm out and points. “It was that carob tree,” he says, “to that carob tree.” “Neighbors,” he shrugs. They figured it out. Al-Noubani and I are in his office at Bir Zeit University’s geography department, discussing histories of Palestinian map-making.1 Palestinians did not really start making maps, he says, until after Oslo.2 When the leadership first began negotiating with Israel over sovereignty in the West Bank and Gaza, the Palestinian side had no maps of its own. In fact, the first maps of the country that Yasser Arafat signed in the negotiations were ones that belonged to, and had been fully drafted by, the Israeli side.3 Recognizing the new urgency to map, the Palestinian leadership would later † I presented a draft of this work under the title “Defending the Palestinian Commons” at the Historical Materialism Conference in New York City, 26-28 April 2013. The final version benefited greatly from the discussion and I thank Salvatore Engel-Di Mauro for arranging our gathering there. In preparing this article for publication, I must also acknowledge the centrality of my sustained discussions with Alvaro Reyes, Denis Wood, Yousuf Al-Bulushi, Mayssun Sukarie, Ahmad Al-Nimer, and Salim Tamari on many of the topics I address here. My conversations with Nidal Al-Azzraq in Aida Refugee Camp have shaped much of my thinking on Palestine and cartography.
    [Show full text]
  • [Review] Salman Abu Sitta(2016) Mapping My Return: a Palestinian Memoir
    [Review] Salman Abu Sitta(2016) Mapping my return: a Palestinian memoir Article (Accepted Version) Irfan, Anne (2017) [Review] Salman Abu Sitta(2016) Mapping my return: a Palestinian memoir. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 44 (2). pp. 283-284. ISSN 1353-0194 This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/70542/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the URL above for details on accessing the published version. Copyright and reuse: Sussex Research Online is a digital repository of the research output of the University. Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable, the material made available in SRO has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk Mapping My Return: A Palestinian Memoir Salman Abu Sitta New York, Cairo, The American University in Cairo Press, 2016, 332 pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping My Return: a Palestinian Memoir Salman Abu Sitta New York, Cairo, the American University in Cairo Press, 2016, 332 Pp
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sussex Research Online Mapping My Return: A Palestinian Memoir Salman Abu Sitta New York, Cairo, The American University in Cairo Press, 2016, 332 pp. With Mapping My Return, Salman Abu Sitta makes the latest contribution to the growing genre of Palestinian refugee memoirs in English, building on previous efforts by Fawaz Turki and more recently Ghada Karmi, Abdel Bari Atwan and Ramzy Baroud. Abu Sitta is most known for his ground-breaking project mapping historic Palestine and developing a practical plan for implementing the right of return, which provides the thematic basis for this memoir. Indeed, he states in the Preface that his purpose in telling his story is to convey the true background to the Palestinian struggle (p. xi). As a memoir, Mapping My Return is organised chronologically, charting the author’s childhood in southern Palestine, the trauma of the Nakba, and his subsequent exile in Egypt, Kuwait, England and Canada. Throughout, his individual experiences are interspersed with major events in Palestinian history. Abu Sitta eloquently employs his own life story and those of his relatives to argue for the refugees’ return as an essential requirement for justice and lasting peace. Striking a more scholarly tone than some of the aforementioned memoirs, he refers to numerous academic texts and primary sources to make his case. As is suggested in the Preface (p. xi), this means that the memoir can also serve as an introductory guide to Palestinian refugee history, enabling readers to probe the subject more thoroughly should they wish.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestinian Refugees This Page Intentionally Left Blank Palestinian Refugees Challenges of Repatriation and Development
    Palestinian Refugees This page intentionally left blank Palestinian Refugees Challenges of Repatriation and Development Edited by Rex Brynen and Roula El-Rifai International Development Research Centre Ottawa · Cairo · Dakar · Montevideo · Nairobi · New Delhi · Singapore Published in 2007 by I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd and the International Development Research Centre 6 Salem Road, London W2 4BU 175 Fifth Avenue, New York NY 10010 www.ibtauris.com International Development Research Centre PO Box 8500 Ottawa, ON KIG 3H9 Canada [email protected]/www.idrc.ca ISBN (e-book) 978–1–55250–231–0 In the United States of America and Canada distributed by Palgrave Macmillan a division of St. Martin’s Press 175 Fifth Avenue, New York NY 10010 Copyright © International Development Research Centre 2007 All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or any part thereof, may not be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. ISBN 978 1 84511 311 7 A full CIP record for this book is available from the British Library A full CIP record is available from the Library of Congress Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: available Typeset by Jayvee, Trivandrum, India Printed and bound in Great Britain by T J International Ltd, Padstow, Cornwall Contents List of figures and tables vii List of contributors x Preface and acknowledgements xvi Glossary xix 1 Introduction: Refugee
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Exile and Return
    1 “Homecoming Is Out of the Question” Palestinian Refugee Cartography and Edward Said’s View from Exile “Forgetfulness leads to exile, while remembrance is the secret of redemption.” The Palestinian refugee activist Salman Abu-Sitta deploys this quotation, which he attributes to the Baal Shem Tov, as one of the epigraphs to his “register of depopulated locales in Palestine,” one of Abu-Sitta’s initial attempts to document the dispossession and forced exile of Palestinians by Zionist militias in 1948, named by Palestinians as the .1 Memory for Abu-Sitta represents nakba a moral demand placed upon refugees: failure to cultivate memory, the epigraph suggests, will prolong refugees’ exile, whereas proper attention to memory will hasten redemption understood as the physical return of refugees to their homes.2 Abu-Sitta displays little interest in the mystical Hasidic framework within which the Baal Shem Tov’s conceptions of exile and redemption operated, one in which exile referred most fundamentally to the estrangement of the people Israel (and by extension, humanity) from God, with redemption correspondingly understood as the mystical cleaving of the soul to God. The epigraphic appeal to the Baal Shem Tov does not point to a mystical dimension to Abu-Sitta’s effort to document the ravages of the , but rather reflects nakba how Abu-Sitta self-consciously locates the Palestinian refugee case within the symbolic discourse of Jewish exile and return. This discursive move is reinforced by another epigraph in Abu-Sitta’s registry of over five hundred destroyed Palestinian towns and villages, a citation from Lam. 5:1–2: “Remember, O God, what has befallen us; behold, and see our disgrace! Our inheritance has been turned over to strangers, our homes to aliens.”3 Abu-Sitta maps Palestinian exile onto Jewish exile and Palestinian refugee memory onto Jewish remembrance of .
    [Show full text]
  • Al Nakba Background
    Atlas of Palestine 1917 - 1966 SALMAN H. ABU-SITTA PALESTINE LAND SOCIETY LONDON Chapter 3: The Nakba Chapter 3 The Nakba 3.1 The Conquest down Palestinian resistance to British policy. The The immediate aim of Plan C was to disrupt Arab end of 1947 marked the greatest disparity between defensive operations, and occupy Arab lands The UN recommendation to divide Palestine the strength of the Jewish immigrant community situated between isolated Jewish colonies. This into two states heralded a new period of conflict and the native inhabitants of Palestine. The former was accompanied by a psychological campaign and suffering in Palestine which continues with had 185,000 able-bodied Jewish males aged to demoralize the Arab population. In December no end in sight. The Zionist movement and its 16-50, mostly military-trained, and many were 1947, the Haganah attacked the Arab quarters in supporters reacted to the announcement of veterans of WWII.244 Jerusalem, Jaffa and Haifa, killing 35 Arabs.252 On the 1947 Partition Plan with joy and dancing. It December 18, 1947, the Palmah, a shock regiment marked another step towards the creation of a The majority of young Jewish immigrants, men established in 1941 with British help, committed Jewish state in Palestine. Palestinians declared and women, below the age of 29 (64 percent of the first reported massacre of the war in the vil- a three-day general strike on December 2, 1947 population) were conscripts.245 Three quarters of lage of al-Khisas in the upper Galilee.253 In the first in opposition to the plan, which they viewed as the front line troops, estimated at 32,000, were three months of 1948, Jewish terrorists carried illegal and a further attempt to advance western military volunteers who had recently landed in out numerous operations, blowing up buses and interests in the region regardless of the cost to Palestine.246 This fighting force was 20 percent of Palestinian homes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Palestinians in Israel Readings in History, Politics and Society
    The Palestinians in Israel Readings in History, Politics and Society Edited by Nadim N. Rouhana and Areej Sabbagh-Khoury 2011 Mada al-Carmel Arab Center for Applied Social Research The Palestinians in Israel: Readings in History, Politics and Society Edited by: Nadim N. Rouhana and Areej Sabbagh-Khoury اﻟﻔﻠﺴﻄﻴﻨﻴﻮن ﰲ إﴎاﺋﻴﻞ: ﻗﺮاءات ﰲ اﻟﺘﺎرﻳﺦ، واﻟﺴﻴﺎﺳﺔ، واملﺠﺘﻤﻊ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﺮ: ﻧﺪﻳﻢ روﺣﺎﻧﺎ وأرﻳﺞ ﺻﺒﺎغ-ﺧﻮري Editorial Board: Muhammad Amara, Mohammad Haj-Yahia, Mustafa Kabha, Rassem Khamaisi, Adel Manna, Khalil-Nakhleh, Nadera Shalhoub-Kevorkian, Mahmoud Yazbak Design and Production: Wael Wakeem ISBN 965-7308-18-6 © All Rights Reserved July 2011 by Mada Mada al-Carmel–Arab Center for Applied Social Research 51 Allenby St., P.O. Box 9132 Haifa 31090, Israel Tel. +972 4 8552035, Fax. +972 4 8525973 www.mada-research.org [email protected] 2 The Palestinians in Israel: Readings in History, Politics and Society Table of Contents Introduction Research on the Palestinians in Israel: Between the Academic and the Political 5 Areej Sabbagh-Khoury and Nadim N. Rouhana The Nakba 16 Honaida Ghanim The Internally Displaced Palestinians in Israel 26 Areej Sabbagh-Khoury The Military Government 47 Yair Bäuml The Conscription of the Druze into the Israeli Army 58 Kais M. Firro Emergency Regulations 67 Yousef Tayseer Jabareen The Massacre of Kufr Qassem 74 Adel Manna Yawm al-Ard (Land Day) 83 Khalil Nakhleh The Higher Follow-Up Committee for the Arab Citizens in Israel 90 Muhammad Amara Palestinian Political Prisoners 100 Abeer Baker National Priority Areas 110 Rassem Khamaisi The Indigenous Palestinian Bedouin of the Naqab: Forced Urbanization and Denied Recognition 120 Ismael Abu-Saad Palestinian Citizenship in Israel 128 Oren Yiftachel 3 Mada al-Carmel Arab Center for Applied Social Research Acknowledgements We would like to express our gratitude to a group of colleagues who helped make possible the project of writing this book and producing it in three languages.
    [Show full text]
  • From Balfour to the Nakba
    Friday 12th to Thursday 18th May 2017 “Expelling people from their homes is FROM BALFOUR a war crime. As well as preventing them TO THE NAKBA: from returning. Israel WEEK OF ACTION didn’t just commit a war crime in 1948 but continues to commit Palestine Solidarity Campaign one to this day.” Resource Pack Salman Abu Sitta, author, www.palestinecampaign.org/campaigns/ Atlas Of Palestine 1948 balfour2nakba #Balfour2Nakba #Balfour2Nakba 1 Contents Introduction to the Week of Action 3 Background 4 Factsheets 6 Infographics and maps 7 Recommended articles 8 Short videos and testimonies 9 Suggestions for film screenings 11 Recommended books 13 Images, poems and music 14 What you can do 15 Get in touch 16 #Balfour2Nakba 2 Introduction to the Week of Action Palestine Solidarity Campaign will be launching a series of events to mark the 69th anniversary of the Palestinians’ loss of their homes and land when the state of Israel was created in 1948. The loss, known by Palestinians as the Nakba or ‘Catastrophe’, was the violent dispossession and removal of the native Palestinian population from their towns and villages. This year also marks the centenary of the Balfour Declaration, when the UK government pledged its support for the Zionist movement’s desire for a Jewish state in Palestine. British complicity in Israel’s racist violence and land theft continues to this day. This pack has been put together to assist you in facilitating your own Nakba Week events. It contains suggestions of films for film screenings, and videos and articles for sharing. For the full list of our Nakba Week of Action events please see: www.palestinecampaign.org/campaigns/ balfour2nakba #Balfour2Nakba 3 Background Every year Palestinians mark the Nakba – “catastrophe” in English – when in 1948 around 750,000 Palestinians were forcibly expelled from their homes during the creation of the state of Israel.
    [Show full text]