Flora of Deepdale 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale Part of VC65
Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale part of VC65 JOHN L. DURKIN MSc. MIEEM BSBI Recorder for County Durham 25 May Avenue. Winlaton Mill, Blaydon, NE21 6SF [email protected] Contents Introduction to the rare plants register Notes on plant distribution and protection The individual species accounts in alphabetical order Site Index First published 2010. This is the 2011, second edition. Improvements in the 2011 edition include- An additional 10% records, most of these more recent and more precise. One kilometre resolution maps for upland and coastal species. My thanks to Bob Ellis for advice on mapping. The ―County Scarce‖ species are now incorporated into the main text. Hieracium is now included. This edition is ―regionally aligned‖, that is, several species which are county rare in Northumberland, but were narrowly rejected for the Durham first edition, are now included. There is now a site index. Cover picture—Dark Red Helleborine at Bishop Middleham Quarry, its premier British site. Introduction Many counties are in the process of compiling a County Rare Plant Register, to assist in the study and conservation of their rare species. The process is made easier if the county has a published Flora and a strong Biological Records Centre, and Durham is fortunate to have Gordon Graham's Flora and the Durham Wildlife Trust‘s ―Recorder" system. We also have a Biodiversity project, based at Rainton Meadows, to carry out conservation projects to protect the rare species. The purpose of this document is to introduce the Rare Plant Register and to give an account of the information that it holds, and the species to be included. -
DM-15-02063-Turbine 2 Punder Gill, Item 5B
Planning Services COMMITTEE REPORT APPLICATION DETAILS APPLICATION NO: DM/15/02063/FPA Erection of turbine no. 2 a 46.3m tip height turbine with FULL APPLICATION DESCRIPTION: associated access and sub-station (one of two turbines sought under two planning applications) NAME OF APPLICANT: Mr M Thompson ADDRESS: Pundergill, Rutherford Lane, Brignall, Barnard Castle ELECTORAL DIVISION: Barnard Castle West Henry Jones, Senior Planning Officer CASE OFFICER: [email protected], 03000 263960 DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE AND PROPOSALS The Site 1. The application site comprises agricultural land that lies approximately 180m to the south of the A66 and 200m to the west of Rutherford Lane. The watercourse of Punder Gill runs roughly east west to the south of the site. A large copse of trees stands immediately to the west of the site. 2. The nearest residential properties outwith the applicants control are situated approximately 215m to the north east at North Bitts, 520m to the east at Dent House Farm, 395m to the west at South Flats Farm and 565m to the south at Timpton Hill Farm. Dent House farmhouse and its adjacent outbuilding is a grade II listed building. The nearest Public Right of Way (PROW) is No.5 Brignall which commences/terminates on the eastern side of Rutherford Lane 220m south east of the application site. 3. The south eastern extent of the North Pennines AONB lies approximately 2.1km to the south of the site, whilst the site itself is designated as an Area of High Landscape value in the Teasdale Local Plan. The nearest site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) lies approximately 1.5km to the west of the site. -
Contents Hawthorn Dene, 1, 5-Jul-1924
Northern Naturalists’ Union Field Meeting Reports- 1924-2005 Contents Hawthorn Dene, 1, 5-jul-1924 .............................. 10 Billingham Marsh, 2, 13-jun-1925 ......................... 13 Sweethope Lough, 3, 11-jul-1925 ........................ 18 The Sneap, 4, 12-jun-1926 ................................... 24 Great Ayton, 5, 18-jun-1927 ................................. 28 Gibside, 6, 23-jul-1927 ......................................... 28 Langdon Beck, 7, 9-jun-1928 ............................... 29 Hawthorn Dene, 8, 5-jul-1928 .............................. 33 Frosterley, 9 ......................................................... 38 The Sneap, 10, 1-jun-1929 ................................... 38 Allenheads, 11, 6-july-1929 .................................. 43 Dryderdale, 12, 14-jun-1930 ................................. 46 Blanchland, 13, 12-jul-1930 .................................. 49 Devil's Water, 14, 15-jun-1931 ............................. 52 Egglestone, 15, 11-jul-1931 ................................. 53 Windlestone Park, 16, June? ............................... 55 Edmondbyers, 17, 16-jul-1932 ............................. 57 Stanhope and Frosterley, 18, 5-jun-1932 ............. 58 The Sneap, 19, 15-jul-1933 .................................. 61 Pigdon Banks, 20, 1-jun-1934 .............................. 62 Greatham Marsh, 21, 21-jul-1934 ........................ 64 Blanchland, 22, 15-jun-1935 ................................ 66 Dryderdale, 23, ..................................................... 68 Raby Park, -
The Bear in Eurasian Plant Names
Kolosova et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2017) 13:14 DOI 10.1186/s13002-016-0132-9 REVIEW Open Access The bear in Eurasian plant names: motivations and models Valeria Kolosova1*, Ingvar Svanberg2, Raivo Kalle3, Lisa Strecker4,Ayşe Mine Gençler Özkan5, Andrea Pieroni6, Kevin Cianfaglione7, Zsolt Molnár8, Nora Papp9, Łukasz Łuczaj10, Dessislava Dimitrova11, Daiva Šeškauskaitė12, Jonathan Roper13, Avni Hajdari14 and Renata Sõukand3 Abstract Ethnolinguistic studies are important for understanding an ethnic group’s ideas on the world, expressed in its language. Comparing corresponding aspects of such knowledge might help clarify problems of origin for certain concepts and words, e.g. whether they form common heritage, have an independent origin, are borrowings, or calques. The current study was conducted on the material in Slavonic, Baltic, Germanic, Romance, Finno-Ugrian, Turkic and Albanian languages. The bear was chosen as being a large, dangerous animal, important in traditional culture, whose name is widely reflected in folk plant names. The phytonyms for comparison were mostly obtained from dictionaries and other publications, and supplemented with data from databases, the co-authors’ field data, and archival sources (dialect and folklore materials). More than 1200 phytonym use records (combinations of a local name and a meaning) for 364 plant and fungal taxa were recorded to help find out the reasoning behind bear-nomination in various languages, as well as differences and similarities between the patterns among them. Among the most common taxa with bear-related phytonyms were Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng., Heracleum sphondylium L., Acanthus mollis L., and Allium ursinum L., with Latin loan translation contributing a high proportion of the phytonyms. -
C-Banding Patterns in Eighteen Taxa of the Genus Paris Sensu Li, Liliaceae
_??_1992 The Japan Mendel Society Cytologia 57: 181-194, 1992 C-banding Patterns in Eighteen Taxa of the Genus Paris sensu Li, Liliaceae Junko Miyamoto1, Siro Kurita1, Gu Zhilian2 and Li Hen2 1 Department of Biology , Faculty of Science, Chiba University, Japan 2 Kunming Institute of Botany , Academy of Science of China, Kunming, Yunnan, China Accepted October 31, 1991 Paris is a perennial genus distributed from Europe to the Far East . Most species, how ever, are restricted to Asia, excepting a European species P. quadrifolia Linnaeus and a Cau casian species P. incompleta M. -Bieberstein. Hara (1969) studied morphological variation in seven species: P. delavayi Franchet; P. incomplete M. -Bieberstein; P. japonica (Franch . et Sav.) Franchet; P. polyphylla Smith; P. quadrifolia Linnaeus; P. tetraphylla A. Gray; and P. verticillata M. -Bieberstein. Takhtajan (1983) founded a new genus Daiswa for all taxa of Papolyphylla complex, but Li (1988) degraded this to the subgeneric level. The historical back ground of Paris taxonomy and the synonymy of each taxon were summarized by Mitchell (1987, 1988). Karyomorphological studies on Japanese species were carried out by various authors (Gotoh 1933, Haga 1934, 1942, Hara 1969, Kayano 1961, Kurabayashi 1952, Kurabayashi and Samejima 1953, Miyamoto and Kurita 1990, Miyamoto et al. 1991, Noda 1963, Stow 1953, Suzuki and Yoshimura 1986). The standard chromosome numbers reported by these authors are 2n=10 (2X) in P. teteraphylla and P. verticillata and 2n=40 (8X) in P. japonica. The only European species, P. quadrifolia, was examined by many authors (Tischler 1934, Gotoh 1937, Geitler 1938, Darlington 1941, Love and Love 1944, Polya 1950, Skalinska et al. -
Türkiye'deki Paris Cinsi Üzerinde Morfolojik, Anatomik Ve Karyolojik
www.biodicon.com Biological Diversity and Conservation ISSN 1308-8084 Online; ISSN 1308-5301 Print 7/2 (2014) 57-69 Research article/Araştırma makalesi Morphological, anatomical and karyological investigations on the genus Paris in Turkey Yeter YEŞİL *, Fatma Neriman ÖZHATAY Istanbul University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Deparment of Pharmaceutical Botany, 34116, İstanbul, Turkey Abstract This study presents morphological, anatomical and karyological characteristics of the genus Paris L. represented by 2 species in Turkey: P. incomplete M. Bieb. and P. quadrifolia L. Taxonomically detailed description of the species are based on collected and examined specimens; distributions and illustrations are presented along with anatomical cross sections of leaves, stems, rhizomes and roots and leaf surfaces. The differing anatomical structure of studied plant parts is suitable for use as an additional tool in their identification. Karyotypes of the species are determined, P. incompleta, as 2n = 10, diploid, chromosome formula is 2m+4sm+2st+2t and P. quadrifolia as 2n = 20, tetraploid, chromosome formula is 4m+8sm+2st+2t. Photographies of species in naturel habitat, distribution map of species in Turkey, detailed drawing of flowers and general view of species, drawings and microphotographies of the karyotypes are also presented. Key words: Paris, morphology, anatomy, taxonomy, karyotype ---------- ---------- Türkiye’deki Paris cinsi üzerinde morfolojik, anatomik ve karyolojik araştırmalar Özet Bu çalışma Türkiye’de 2 tür (P. incomplete M. Bieb. ve P. quadrifolia L.) ile temsil edilen Paris L. cinsinin morfolojik, anatomik ve karyolojik özelliklerini içermektedir. Türlerin toplanan ve incelenen örneklere dayanarak yapılan detaylı tanımlamaları, dağılımları ve çizimleri ve yaprak, gövde, rizom ve köklerin enine kesitleri ve yaprakların yüzeysel kesitleri de yer almaktadır. -
Tees Valley Statement of Transport Ambition Strategic Environmental Assessment
Tees Valley Statement of Transport Ambition Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report Tees Valley Statement of Transport Ambition Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report JMP Consultants Limited Minerva House East Parade Leeds LS1 5PS T 0113 244 4347 F 0113 242 3753 E [email protected] www.jmp.co.uk Job No. NEA6082 Report No. 2 Prepared by AD/JJ Verified MR Approved by MR Status Final Issue No. 1 Date 28 February 2011 Tees Valley Statement of Transport Ambition Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report Contents Amendments Record This document has been issued and amended as follows: Status/Revision Revision description Issue Number Approved By Date Draft For TVU approval 1 MR 18/02/2011 Final For consultation 2 MR 28/02/2011 Contents 1 NON – TECHNICAL SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 The SEA Process ....................................................................................................................... 1 Consultation ................................................................................................................................ 4 2 CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................... 5 Strategic Environmental Assessment ........................................................................................ -
Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale Part of VC65
Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale part of VC65 JOHN L. DURKIN MSc. MIEEM BSBI Recorder for County Durham 25 May Avenue. Winlaton Mill, Blaydon, NE21 6SF [email protected] Contents Introduction to the rare plants register Notes on plant distribution and protection The individual species accounts in alphabetical order Site Index First published 2010. This is the 2011, second edition. Improvements in the 2011 edition include- An additional 10% records, most of these more recent and more precise. One kilometre resolution maps for upland and coastal species. My thanks to Bob Ellis for advice on mapping. The ―County Scarce‖ species are now incorporated into the main text. Hieracium is now included. This edition is ―regionally aligned‖, that is, several species which are county rare in Northumberland, but were narrowly rejected for the Durham first edition, are now included. There is now a site index. Cover picture—Dark Red Helleborine at Bishop Middleham Quarry, its premier British site. Introduction Many counties are in the process of compiling a County Rare Plant Register, to assist in the study and conservation of their rare species. The process is made easier if the county has a published Flora and a strong Biological Records Centre, and Durham is fortunate to have Gordon Graham's Flora and the Durham Wildlife Trust‘s ―Recorder" system. We also have a Biodiversity project, based at Rainton Meadows, to carry out conservation projects to protect the rare species. The purpose of this document is to introduce the Rare Plant Register and to give an account of the information that it holds, and the species to be included. -
(Paris Quadrifolia L., Trilliaceae): Relation to Soil and Air Temperatures
The growth and phenology patterns of herb Paris (Paris quadrifolia L., Trilliaceae): relation to soil and air ... The growth and phenology patterns of herb Paris (Paris quadrifolia L., Trilliaceae): relation to soil and air temperatures Dag K. Bjerketvedt1, The phenology and development of Paris quadrifolia L. has been related Arvid Odland1, to variations in soil and air temperatures during four seasons (1997 2000). Its emergence appeared to be strongly dependent on soil tempe- 2 Jonas Naujalis , rature. Plants became visible as soon as the daily mean maximum soil Juozas Lazutka2 temperature reached ca. 7 °C. Variations in soil temperatures could delay Paris emergence by almost one month during the study period. 1 Department of Arts and Sciences, The plants needed on average 18 days to develop from 10% to 95% of Telemark University College, maximum height, and flowers were developed after ca. 30 days. The 3800 B¸, Norway growth and phenology pattern of Paris is therefore not typical of a light- 2 Department of Botany and Genetics, demanding early spring plant. Its need for a relatively long developmen- Vilnius University, tal period is compensated for by its ability to survive by vegetative growth LT-2600 Vilnius, Lithuania during low light periods. The investigation showed that the temperature sum is not a useful tool for predicting phenological events in areas where frozen soil occurs. Two populations separated by ca. 6 m had a two-week difference in emergence due to differences in soil temperatu- re. Sterile plants were generally lower than 14 cm and fertile plants were mostly taller than 20 cm. -
County Durham LTP3 HRA Screening 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Appropriate Assessment Process 3 1.2 Natura 2000 Sites 3
Contents County Durham LTP3 HRA Screening 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Appropriate Assessment Process 3 1.2 Natura 2000 Sites 3 2 Identification and Description of Natura 2000 Sites 5 3 Description of the Plan 15 3.1 LTP3 Strategy and Delivery Plan 20 4 Methodology: Broad Impact Types and Pathways 21 5 Screening Analysis of Draft LTP3 25 5.1 Goals and Objectives 25 5.2 Draft policies and related interventions in the three year programme 25 6 Assessment of Likely Significance 57 6.1 Assessment of Likely Significance 57 6.2 Other plans and projects 75 7 LTP3 Consultation: Amendments and Implications for HRA 77 Appendices 1 Component SSSIs of Natura 2000 Sites within 15km of County Durham 95 2 Summary of Favourable Conditions to be Maintained, Condition, Vulnerabilities and Threats of Natura 2000 Sites 108 3 Initial Issues Identification of Longer-term Programme 124 County Durham LTP3 HRA Screening Contents County Durham LTP3 HRA Screening Introduction 1 1 Introduction 1.0.1 Durham County Council is in the process of preparing its Local Transport Plan 3. In accordance with the Conservation (Natural Habitats, etc.) (Amendment) Regulations 2010 and European Communities (1992) Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and Wild Fauna and Flora, County Durham is required to undertake Screening for Appropriate Assessment of the draft Local Transport Plan. 1.1 Appropriate Assessment Process 1.1.1 Under the Habitat Regulations, Appropriate Assessment is an assessment of the potential effects of a proposed project or plan on one or more sites of international nature conservation importance. -
Introduction
INTRODUCTION Geology Landscape Mining Weather Flowers and Wildlife Access to the Countryside Getting to the North Pennines Getting around the North Pennines Tourist Information and Visitor Centres Maps Emergencies How to Use This Guidebook 1 GELTSDALE Walk 1 Brampton, Gelt and Talkin Walk 2 Hallbankgate and Cold Fell Walk 3 Castle Carrock and Geltsdale Walk 4 Croglin, Newbiggin and Croglin Fell 2 THE EAST FELLSIDE Walk 5 Hartside, Black Fell and Renwick Walk 6 Melmerby and Knapside Hill Walk 7 Maiden Way – Kirkland to Alston Walk 8 Blencarn, Cross Fell and Kirkland Walk 9 Knockergill Pass – Knock to Garrigill Walk 10 Dufton, Great Rundale and High Cup 3 WARCOP RANGE Walk 11 Murton, Murton Pike and Murton Fell Walk 12 Hilton and Tinside Rigg Walk 13 Mickle Fell via the Boundary Route 4 STAINMORE Walk 14 North Stainmore and Slate Quarry Moss Walk 15 Kirkby Stephen and Nine Standards Walk 16 The Tan Hill Inn and Sleightholme Moor Walk 17 Bowes and Bowes Moor 5 LOWER TEESDALE Walk 18 Greta Bridge and Brignall Banks Walk 19 Barnard Castle and the Tees Walk 20 Woodland and Copley Walk 21 Cotherstone and Romaldkirk 6 MIDDLE TEESDALE Walk 22 Tees Railway Walk Walk 23 Middleton and Monk’s Moor Walk 24 Middleton and Grassholme 7 UPPER TEESDALE Walk 25 Low Force and High Force Walk 26 Holwick and Hagworm Hill Walk 27 Cronkley Fell Walk 28 Cow Green and Widdybank Fell Walk 29 Cow Green and Herdship Fell 8 WEARDALE Walk 30 Wolsingham and Frosterley Walk 31 Stanhope and Stanhope Dene Walk 32 Westgate, Middlehope and Rookhope Walk 33 Chapelfell Top and -
SANKARAN Rajan Introduction for a Long Time I Hesitated to Write a Book on Remedies Because I Am Well Aware of the Dangers Inherent in Such an Undertaking
SANKARAN Rajan Introduction For a long time I hesitated to write a book on remedies because I am well aware of the dangers inherent in such an undertaking. In the first place, there is a strong possibility that the reader, especially if he is a beginner in the field, might become fixed on these remedy pictures and forget that every remedy has a wider range and greater scope than any one individual can see or describe. Not realising that these pictures represent only one version, only one view of the remedy, he might wrongly imagine that he had seen the whole. I also realise that an idea imper- fectly communicated which might easily be corrected in a "Live" teaching situation, is far less easily rectified when it has been committed to print. Finally there is a danger that the reader's Materia Medica may be narrowed down to the limited number of remedies described here; it may create a tendency to try to fit all patients into one of these pictures; thus young practition- ers might fail to make the unprejudiced search through the Repertory or the more complete Materia Medica which the best prescribing requires. However, in the last two or three years, my books "The Spirit of Homoeopathy" and "The Sub- stance of Homoeopathy" have achieved some popularity. These books, written to introduce stu- dents of Homoeopathy to my line of thinking are not, and were never intended to be, texts of Materia Medica. Nevertheless some readers found the ideas on various remedies presented in these books useful in practice, though somewhat inconvenient in form, since using the index to check a particular remedy often obliges one to look in several different places.