DOCSLIB.ORG

Tees Valley Statement of Transport Ambition Strategic Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tees Valley Statement of Transport Ambition Strategic Environmental Assessment Tees Valley Statement of Transport Ambition Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report Tees Valley Statement of Transport Ambition Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report JMP Consultants Limited Minerva House East Parade Leeds LS1 5PS T 0113 244 4347 F 0113 242 3753 E [email protected] www.jmp.co.uk Job No. NEA6082 Report No. 2 Prepared by AD/JJ Verified MR Approved by MR Status Final Issue No. 1 Date 28 February 2011 Tees Valley Statement of Transport Ambition Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report Contents Amendments Record This document has been issued and amended as follows: Status/Revision Revision description Issue Number Approved By Date Draft For TVU approval 1 MR 18/02/2011 Final For consultation 2 MR 28/02/2011 Contents 1 NON – TECHNICAL SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 The SEA Process ....................................................................................................................... 1 Consultation ................................................................................................................................ 4 2 CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................... 5 Strategic Environmental Assessment ......................................................................................... 5 Tees Valley Unlimited Statement of Transport Ambition ............................................................ 6 Third Local Transport Plans ....................................................................................................... 7 Strategic Environmental Assessment and the Tees Valley Statement of Transport Ambition ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Health Impact Assessment and Tees Valley Unlimited Statement of Ambition ......................... 9 3 RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER PLANS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMMES............................ 13 4 BASELINE INFORMATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS ........................................ 17 Biodiversity ............................................................................................................................... 17 Population ................................................................................................................................. 28 Health ....................................................................................................................................... 31 Soil ............................................................................................................................................ 33 Land quality and contamination ................................................................................................ 35 Water ........................................................................................................................................ 36 Flooding .................................................................................................................................... 43 Air Quality ................................................................................................................................. 47 Climate ...................................................................................................................................... 49 Cultural Heritage ....................................................................................................................... 55 Landscape ................................................................................................................................ 58 Noise ......................................................................................................................................... 59 Safety ........................................................................................................................................ 61 Accessibility .............................................................................................................................. 63 Economy ................................................................................................................................... 66 Material Assets ......................................................................................................................... 70 Potential Environmental Problems ........................................................................................... 72 5 SEA OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................... 77 Development of the SEA Objectives ........................................................................................ 77 6 ASSESSMENT ......................................................................................................................... 82 Assessment of Alternatives ...................................................................................................... 83 Assessments of Options ........................................................................................................... 93 7 MITIGATION OF EFFECTS ................................................................................................... 100 8 INCORPORATING RESULTS OF THE SEA AND HIA INTO THE TRANSPORT STRATEGY ..................................................................................................................................... 104 9 MONITORING FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................... 105 10 REMAINING STAGES OF STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT .......................... 109 Consultation ............................................................................................................................ 109 Production of SEA Statement ................................................................................................. 109 Tables and Figures Table 2.1 Compliance with assessment of human health ................................................................. 9 Table 3.1 Summary of issues from review of plans and programmes ............................................ 13 Table 4.1 Qualifying species, Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA ............................................ 18 Table 4.2 Special Areas of Conservation, Tees Valley ................................................................... 20 Table 4.3 Tees Valley SSSIs .......................................................................................................... 25 Table 4.4 Priority habitats and species, Tees Valley ...................................................................... 28 Table 4.5 Population densities, Tees Valley ................................................................................... 29 Table 4.6 Projected populations 2006-21 - All persons (thousands) .............................................. 30 Table 4.7 Car ownership in the Tees Valley, 2001 ......................................................................... 31 Table 4.8 Car ownership by district in the Tees Valley, 2001 ......................................................... 31 Table 4.9 Percentage of people with a health problem ................................................................... 32 Table 4.10 Local area costs of physical inactivity ........................................................................... 32 Table 4.11 Previously developed land available for redevelopment, 2008 ..................................... 36 Table 4.12 Water quality (biological), 2006 ..................................................................................... 36 Table 4.13 Water quality (chemical), 2006...................................................................................... 37 Table 4.14 Status objectives for rivers and lakes in the Tees river catchment ............................... 38 Table 4.15 Current status and objectives for groundwater bodies in the Tees Valley .................... 39 Table 4.16 Current status and objectives for estuarine and coastal water bodies in the Tees Valley .......................................................................................................................................................... 40 Table 4.17 Bathing Water Assessment Ratings ............................................................................. 42 Table 4.18 Tees Valley flooding issues ........................................................................................... 44 Table 4.19 Locations of Towns and Villages with 25 or more properties at risk in a 1 per cent annual probability river flood ............................................................................................................ 45 Table 4.20 Fuel consumption (thousand tonnes) from road transport, 2007 .................................. 51 Table 4.21 CO2 emissions (kTonnes) from transport, 2000 ........................................................... 51 Table 4.22 Road transport emissions per capita, 2007 .................................................................. 52 Table 4.23 Local tranquillity scores for Tees Valley authorities .....................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale Part of VC65
    Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale part of VC65 JOHN L. DURKIN MSc. MIEEM BSBI Recorder for County Durham 25 May Avenue. Winlaton Mill, Blaydon, NE21 6SF [email protected] Contents Introduction to the rare plants register Notes on plant distribution and protection The individual species accounts in alphabetical order Site Index First published 2010. This is the 2011, second edition. Improvements in the 2011 edition include- An additional 10% records, most of these more recent and more precise. One kilometre resolution maps for upland and coastal species. My thanks to Bob Ellis for advice on mapping. The ―County Scarce‖ species are now incorporated into the main text. Hieracium is now included. This edition is ―regionally aligned‖, that is, several species which are county rare in Northumberland, but were narrowly rejected for the Durham first edition, are now included. There is now a site index. Cover picture—Dark Red Helleborine at Bishop Middleham Quarry, its premier British site. Introduction Many counties are in the process of compiling a County Rare Plant Register, to assist in the study and conservation of their rare species. The process is made easier if the county has a published Flora and a strong Biological Records Centre, and Durham is fortunate to have Gordon Graham's Flora and the Durham Wildlife Trust‘s ―Recorder" system. We also have a Biodiversity project, based at Rainton Meadows, to carry out conservation projects to protect the rare species. The purpose of this document is to introduce the Rare Plant Register and to give an account of the information that it holds, and the species to be included.
    [Show full text]
  • PEIR Appendix
    Preliminary Environmental Information Report Volume III - Appendices Appendix 17A: Landscape Character The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (as amended) Prepared for: Net Zero Teesside Power Ltd. & Net Zero North Sea Storage Ltd. Appendix 17A Landscape Character Table of Contents 17A. Landscape Character .....................................................17-1 17.1 National ...................................................................................................... 17-1 17.2 Regional ..................................................................................................... 17-4 17.3 Local ........................................................................................................... 17-4 17.4 References ................................................................................................. 17-9 Tables Table 17A-1: NCA Summary Table ....................................................................... 17-1 Table 17A-2: MCA Summary Table (Marine Management Organisation, 2018) .... 17-3 Table 17A-3: Landscape Tracts summary table (Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council, 2006) ....................................................................................................... 17-5 Table 17A-4: Landscape Character Areas Summary Table (Stockton on Tees Borough Council, 2011) ......................................................................................... 17-7 Table 17A-5: Landscape Character Types Summary Table (Hartlepool Borough Council, 2000)
    [Show full text]
  • Contaminated Land Inspection Strategy 2013
    Area Management Regulatory Services Environmental Protection Contaminated Land Inspection Strategy 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On April 1st 2000, Part 2A of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 (inserted into that Act by section 57 of the Environment Act 1995) came into force. The main objective requires local authorities to take a “strategic approach” to inspecting their areas to identify land where contamination is causing unacceptable risks to human health or the wider environment. This document is the second review and sets out the manner in which Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council proposes to implement its inspection duties under Part 2A in accordance with the revised Statutory Guidance issued by the Department of Environment and Rural Affairs in April 2012 which should be read in conjunction with this Strategy. This is a comprehensive review of the Strategy to reflect the many changes in contaminated land legislation and guidance published in the last few years. Using a bespoke software package (GeoEnviron) with the Council’s GIS system, contaminated land has been identified and prioritised. The Council identified landfill sites within the borough as highest priority for inspection due to problems from landfill gas, land stability and leachate pollution, potentially posing high risks to neighbouring occupants, and therefore concentrated resources in these areas. To-date, following successful funding bids to Defra, the Council has investigated 3 former landfill sites known to have domestic waste tipped and continues to monitor and manage gas at these sites to minimise the risk to nearby residents. From the work carried out to-date, no sites have been determined as contaminated land, under the definition stated within the statutory guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Writes of Spring
    On 20 March 2019 we asked people across the UK to capture the arrival of the first official day of spring and help create a crowd-sourced nature diary. More than 400 people did just that from across the four corners of the UK – celebrating this season of colour and the natural world coming to life. The following pages are a selection of the entries curated by the writer Abi Andrews. Introduction n 2018, my spring was spent in a caravan, in a glade in view of Carningli mountain, Itopped by a rocky grey outcrop with purple heathers, confettied below with vivid yellow gorse. The caravan sat within the Pembrokeshire Coast National Park, in an area that saw an influx of ‘back-to-the-landers’ during the seventies. In it you will find covert, sympathetically built dwellings and cooperative human communities in repurposed farmhouses, lying between woods of bent, blackened oaks, their flamboyant colonies of lichens, and boulders covered with soft and ecstatic mosses. On the moors are strange, stunted Welsh horses, their silhouettes hunched like the simplified animals of Neolithic rock art. Clear spring water gurgles up and silvers everything, running brown through the taps after a heavy rain. At night, owls call to each other. In spring 2019, I was the most attentive to the living world that I have ever been, for the transition of a season. I grew up in suburbia, and moved soon after to a city. Living closer to the land has offered me an anchoring, in noticing the seasons more: the fatigue that comes with winter darkness, the processing of firewood for next year, the harvesting of food — being reminded all the time of the future by preparing for it.
    [Show full text]
  • DM-15-02063-Turbine 2 Punder Gill, Item 5B
    Planning Services COMMITTEE REPORT APPLICATION DETAILS APPLICATION NO: DM/15/02063/FPA Erection of turbine no. 2 a 46.3m tip height turbine with FULL APPLICATION DESCRIPTION: associated access and sub-station (one of two turbines sought under two planning applications) NAME OF APPLICANT: Mr M Thompson ADDRESS: Pundergill, Rutherford Lane, Brignall, Barnard Castle ELECTORAL DIVISION: Barnard Castle West Henry Jones, Senior Planning Officer CASE OFFICER: [email protected], 03000 263960 DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE AND PROPOSALS The Site 1. The application site comprises agricultural land that lies approximately 180m to the south of the A66 and 200m to the west of Rutherford Lane. The watercourse of Punder Gill runs roughly east west to the south of the site. A large copse of trees stands immediately to the west of the site. 2. The nearest residential properties outwith the applicants control are situated approximately 215m to the north east at North Bitts, 520m to the east at Dent House Farm, 395m to the west at South Flats Farm and 565m to the south at Timpton Hill Farm. Dent House farmhouse and its adjacent outbuilding is a grade II listed building. The nearest Public Right of Way (PROW) is No.5 Brignall which commences/terminates on the eastern side of Rutherford Lane 220m south east of the application site. 3. The south eastern extent of the North Pennines AONB lies approximately 2.1km to the south of the site, whilst the site itself is designated as an Area of High Landscape value in the Teasdale Local Plan. The nearest site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) lies approximately 1.5km to the west of the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex a Ecology Survey Report 2020
    Dogger Bank C/Sofia Onshore Works Application Appendix 4 – Annex A Ecology Survey Report 2020 Classification: Internal Status: Draft Expiry date: N/A 1 of 28 Classification: Internal Status: Draft Expiry date: N/A 2 of 28 Doc. No. PM763-ARCUS-00001; 003655558-01 Rev. no. 01 Ecology Survey Report Valid from: July 2020 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 4 2 Methods ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 3 Results ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 Classification: Internal Status: Draft Expiry date: N/A 3 of 28 Doc. No. PM763-ARCUS-00001; 003655558-01 Rev. no. 01 Ecology Survey Report Valid from: July 2020 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose of the Report This Report provides baseline information for the Ecology Assessment which supports the Environmental Appraisal submitted to support the planning application (the Application) made by Doggerbank Offshore Wind Farm Project 3 Projco Limited (the Projco) and Sofia Offshore Wind Farm Limited (SOWFL) (the Applicants), for consent pursuant to Section 62 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended. The Application includes five areas of alternative and additional infrastructure to the consented 9 kilometres (km) buried onshore grid connection, from approximately 1.5 km landward of the landfall for Dogger Bank Wind Farm C (DB-C) and Sofia Offshore Wind Farm (Sofia) to the National Grid at Lackenby Substation (the Works). 1.2 Development Context For the ease of reference, the Works, as shown in Figure 1.2 (a – c) of the Environmental Appraisal, is split into areas as below: Area 1 – A174 Crossing; Area 2 – South of Kirkleatham Memorial Park; Area 3 – Wilton East; Area 4 – Main Welfare Hub south of Wilton; and Area 5 – HVAC Cable Corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • Trinity College War Memorial Mcmxiv–Mcmxviii
    TRINITY COLLEGE WAR MEMORIAL MCMXIV–MCMXVIII Iuxta fidem defuncti sunt omnes isti non acceptis repromissionibus sed a longe [eas] aspicientes et salutantes et confitentes quia peregrini et hospites sunt super terram. These all died in faith, not having received the promises, but having seen them afar off, and were persuaded of them, and embraced them, and confessed that they were strangers and pilgrims on the earth. Hebrews 11: 13 Adamson, William at Trinity June 25 1909; BA 1912. Lieutenant, 16th Lancers, ‘C’ Squadron. Wounded; twice mentioned in despatches. Born Nov 23 1884 at Sunderland, Northumberland. Son of Died April 8 1918 of wounds received in action. Buried at William Adamson of Langham Tower, Sunderland. School: St Sever Cemetery, Rouen, France. UWL, FWR, CWGC Sherborne. Admitted as pensioner at Trinity June 25 1904; BA 1907; MA 1911. Captain, 6th Loyal North Lancshire Allen, Melville Richard Howell Agnew Regiment, 6th Battalion. Killed in action in Iraq, April 24 1916. Commemorated at Basra Memorial, Iraq. UWL, FWR, CWGC Born Aug 8 1891 in Barnes, London. Son of Richard William Allen. School: Harrow. Admitted as pensioner at Trinity Addy, James Carlton Oct 1 1910. Aviator’s Certificate Dec 22 1914. Lieutenant (Aeroplane Officer), Royal Flying Corps. Killed in flying Born Oct 19 1890 at Felkirk, West Riding, Yorkshire. Son of accident March 21 1917. Buried at Bedford Cemetery, Beds. James Jenkin Addy of ‘Carlton’, Holbeck Hill, Scarborough, UWL, FWR, CWGC Yorks. School: Shrewsbury. Admitted as pensioner at Trinity June 25 1910; BA 1913. Captain, Temporary Major, East Allom, Charles Cedric Gordon Yorkshire Regiment. Military Cross.
    [Show full text]
  • Phosphorus Dynamics and Submerged Aquatic Macrophytes in Hell Kettles
    Durham E-Theses Phosphorus dynamics and submerged aquatic macrophytes in hell kettles Giantzoudis, Dimitris How to cite: Giantzoudis, Dimitris (2003) Phosphorus dynamics and submerged aquatic macrophytes in hell kettles, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4079/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk PHOSPHORUS DYNAMICS AND SUBMERGED AQUATIC MACROPHYTES IN HELL KETTLES The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. BY DlMITRIS GlANTZOUDIS B.Sc. UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX M.Sc. NAPIER UNIVERSITY A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM, ENGLAND SCHOOL OF BIOLOGICAL AND BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES FEBRUARY 2003 1 8 JUfo 2Q03 ABSTRACT A study was made of the phosphorus ecology of Hell Kettle ponds, a Site of Special Scientific Interest in County Durham, UK, in order to help establish the causes of the temporary "whitening" of Chara hispida in summer 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Minerals and Waste Core Strategy
    Tees Valley Joint Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents In association with Core Strategy DPD Adopted September 2011 27333-r22.indd 1 08/11/2010 14:55:36 i ii Foreword The Tees Valley Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents (DPDs) - prepared jointly by the boroughs of Darlington, Hartlepool, Middlesbrough, Redcar and Cleveland and Stockton-on-Tees - bring together the planning issues which arise from these two subjects within the sub-region. Two DPDs have been prepared. This Minerals and Waste Core Strategy contains the long-term spatial vision and the strategic policies needed to achieve the key objectives for minerals and waste developments in the Tees Valley. The separate Policies and Sites DPD, which conforms with it, identifies specific sites for minerals and waste development and sets out policies which will be used to assess minerals and waste planning applications. The DPDs form part of the local development framework and development plan for each Borough. They cover all of the five Boroughs except for the part within Redcar and Cleveland that lies within the North York Moors National Park. (Minerals and waste policies for that area are included in the national park’s own local development framework.) The DPDs were prepared during a lengthy process of consultation. This allowed anyone with an interest in minerals and waste in the Tees Valley the opportunity to be involved. An Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State carried out an Examination into the DPDs in early 2011. He concluded that they had been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and were sound.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Hawthorn Dene, 1, 5-Jul-1924
    Northern Naturalists’ Union Field Meeting Reports- 1924-2005 Contents Hawthorn Dene, 1, 5-jul-1924 .............................. 10 Billingham Marsh, 2, 13-jun-1925 ......................... 13 Sweethope Lough, 3, 11-jul-1925 ........................ 18 The Sneap, 4, 12-jun-1926 ................................... 24 Great Ayton, 5, 18-jun-1927 ................................. 28 Gibside, 6, 23-jul-1927 ......................................... 28 Langdon Beck, 7, 9-jun-1928 ............................... 29 Hawthorn Dene, 8, 5-jul-1928 .............................. 33 Frosterley, 9 ......................................................... 38 The Sneap, 10, 1-jun-1929 ................................... 38 Allenheads, 11, 6-july-1929 .................................. 43 Dryderdale, 12, 14-jun-1930 ................................. 46 Blanchland, 13, 12-jul-1930 .................................. 49 Devil's Water, 14, 15-jun-1931 ............................. 52 Egglestone, 15, 11-jul-1931 ................................. 53 Windlestone Park, 16, June? ............................... 55 Edmondbyers, 17, 16-jul-1932 ............................. 57 Stanhope and Frosterley, 18, 5-jun-1932 ............. 58 The Sneap, 19, 15-jul-1933 .................................. 61 Pigdon Banks, 20, 1-jun-1934 .............................. 62 Greatham Marsh, 21, 21-jul-1934 ........................ 64 Blanchland, 22, 15-jun-1935 ................................ 66 Dryderdale, 23, ..................................................... 68 Raby Park,
    [Show full text]
  • Tees Valley Joint Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents
    Draft Only i APPENDIX 2(i) Tees Valley Joint Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents Core Strategy Publication Document August 2009 Draft Only ii Draft Only iii Foreword The preparation of Joint Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents (DPDs) for Darlington, Hartlepool, Middlesbrough, Redcar and Cleveland and Stockton-on-Tees Boroughs presents an important opportunity to understand and deal with the cross boundary issues which arise from these two subjects in the Tees Valley. Two DPDs are being prepared. This Core Strategy contains the long-term spatial vision and the strategic policies needed to achieve the key objectives for minerals and waste developments in the Tees Valley. The Policies and Sites document will, in conformity with this Core Strategy, identify specific sites for future minerals and waste development and provide a limited range of policies which will be used to assess minerals and waste planning applications. The DPDs will form part of the Local Development Framework for each Borough, which together with the Regional Spatial Strategy for North East England will form the Development Plan for the area. The DPDs cover all of the land within the five Boroughs except for the part within Redcar & Cleveland Borough that also falls within the North York Moors National Park. The Publication Document represents the third stage of the preparation process. The first stage, in May 2007, was the production of an Issues and Options Report, where the issues affecting minerals and waste development in the Tees Valley were identified and consultees and the general public were asked to identify which of the options presented were the most appropriate for dealing with the issues.
    [Show full text]
  • County Durham Plan (Adopted 2020)
    County Durham Plan ADOPTED 2020 Contents Foreword 5 1 Introduction 7 Neighbourhood Plans 7 Assessing Impacts 8 Duty to Cooperate: Cross-Boundary Issues 9 County Durham Plan Key Diagram and Monitoring 10 2 What the County Durham Plan is Seeking to Achieve 11 3 Vision and Objectives 14 Delivering Sustainable Development 18 4 How Much Development and Where 20 Quantity of Development (How Much) 20 Spatial Distribution of Development (Where) 29 5 Core Principles 71 Building a Strong Competitive Economy 71 Ensuring the Vitality of Town Centres 78 Supporting a Prosperous Rural Economy 85 Delivering a Wide Choice of High Quality Homes 98 Protecting Green Belt Land 124 Sustainable Transport 127 Supporting High Quality Infrastructure 138 Requiring Good Design 150 Promoting Healthy Communities 158 Meeting the Challenge of Climate Change, Flooding and Coastal Change 167 Conserving and Enhancing the Natural and Historic Environment 185 Minerals and Waste 212 Appendices A Strategic Policies 259 B Table of Superseded Policies 261 C Coal Mining Risk Assessments, Minerals Assessments and Minerals and/or Waste 262 Infrastructure Assessment D Safeguarding Mineral Resources and Safeguarded Minerals and Waste Sites 270 E Glossary of Terms 279 CDP Adopted Version 2020 Contents List of County Durham Plan Policies Policy 1 Quantity of New Development 20 Policy 2 Employment Land 30 Policy 3 Aykley Heads 38 Policy 4 Housing Allocations 47 Policy 5 Durham City's Sustainable Urban Extensions 61 Policy 6 Development on Unallocated Sites 68 Policy 7 Visitor Attractions
    [Show full text]