DOCSLIB.ORG

County Durham Local Development Framework

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

County Durham Local Development Framework Technical Paper No. 20 Minerals April 2010 – Version 1.4F 1 Contents Section Page 1 Introduction 3 2 Why are minerals important? 9 3 Policy Context 12 4 County Durham’s Geology 17 5 Mineral Resources and Mineral Working – baseline data and evidence 21 base gaps 6 Scoping the Minerals Content of the Core Strategy 48 7 The future Need for Aggregates 50 8 The future Requirement for Non Aggregates 61 9 Where should new mineral working occur? 68 10 Key policy areas 76 11 Further information 94 Appendices 1 Policy Context 96 2 Mineral Local Plan – Schedule of Saved Policies 110 3 Mineral Sites in County Durham 111 4 Problems encountered in preparing forecasts for Mineral Extraction. 119 5 North East Regional Aggregates Working Party 123 Annual Aggregates Monitoring Reports Information. 6 Detailed Permitted Reserves and Mineral Sales information and Future 129 Need. 7 Profile of Mineral Working and environmental constraints by sub regional 140 areas 1 North Pennines 2 Dales Fringe 3 East Durham Limestone Plateau 4 West Durham Coalfield 5 Wear and Tees Lowlands 8 Glossary of Terms 159 2 SECTION 1.0: Introduction 1.1 On the 1st April 2009 a new unitary ‘County Council’ replaced the existing County Council and all of the seven District and Borough Councils in County Durham. In preparation for this, the Development Plans function was subject to early integration and work was started in 2008 on a new Local Development Framework (LDF) for the whole of County Durham. To avoid jargon we call it the ‘County Durham Plan’. 1.2 The County Durham Plan is a key plan for the new Council. It provides the planning framework embodied in spatial documents that are required to deliver local priorities as set out in the Sustainable Community Strategy through facilitating and delivering development. There is therefore a requirement to draw the two processes together. It will also be based on the requirements set out in the Regional Spatial Strategy and on the Council’s own ambitions to address the key issues of climate change and regeneration. 1.3 The policies and proposals will need to be based on accurate and tested evidence and needs assessment. The evidence needs to include the Economic Assessment of the County, the Joint Strategic Needs Assessment, the Strategic Housing Market Assessment, aligning with the principles set out in Transforming Places. The County Durham Plan will provide the planning framework to deliver the County’s vision for economic prosperity and improved quality of life. The key to this will be the Economic Strategy, the Local Transport Plan and other County based plans and strategies including the growth point areas. 1.4 In April 2010 Durham County Council’s Cabinet, approved a revised programme timetable for the County Durham Plan, the Local Development Scheme (LDS) – called “County Durham Plan - What we’re doing and when”. The revised LDS sets out a new timetable for preparing the County Durham Plan. It indicates that the preparation of the Core Strategy DPD will be the Council’s immediate priority. Once adopted the Core Strategy DPD will contain the overarching strategy for future development of the County, including minerals and waste in the period up until the end of 2030. 1.5 The second priority for the Council will be the preparation of three further DPDs and a Proposals Map. • Development Management DPD - This DPD will set out the County’s policies on Development Management, stating what types of development will be encouraged and permitted. It will carry forward, where appropriate, the designations made in former District Council Local Plans; • Development Allocations DPD – This DPD will identify the allocated sites for different types of development required to deliver the locational strategy in the Core Strategy (excluding minerals and waste); • Gypsy and Travellers DPD – This DPD Will establish policies on providing sites and accommodation for Gypsies and Travellers; and • Proposals Map – This will be a spatial presentation of the policies and proposals contained in the County Durham Plan. This map will be updated as work on the DPDs progresses. 3 1.6 The third priority for the Council will be the preparation of a Minerals & Waste Policies and Allocations DPD. This DPD will develop in detail the strategic minerals and waste policies of the Core Strategy DPD and in conjunction with the Core Strategy DPD set out a minerals and waste delivery strategy for County Durham. The DPD will also set the detailed development management framework for minerals and waste and where needed and justified allocate non strategic minerals and waste sites. 1.7 In revised the LDS the Council is clear that the priority for the Council will be to progress those DPDs that are clearly vital to spatial planning in the County, especially those to which resources have already been committed. However, there are other DPDs that would be desirable, given sufficient time and resources, and those which might be deemed necessary as the plan preparation progresses. See below: • The Durham City Area Action Plan - may be produced to support the Core Strategy to enable certain aspects of the Durham City Vision. It would support those initiatives currently underway and those likely to take place in the future in order to achieve the future development of Durham City. • The Spennymoor, Peterlee and Bishop Auckland Area Action Plans – may be produced to support the Core Strategy and Development Allocations DPDs in order to enable specific aspects of the Growth Point programme such as the regeneration of Peterlee or Spennymoor town centres to be delivered. • The Newton Aycliffe Town Centre Area Action Plan – would seek to provide a comprehensive regeneration framework that will challenge existing use, target change and inspire action to guide future investment and activity in the Town Centre. A number of sites are already in public ownership and the Council is in discussion with the Town Centre owners about their redevelopment proposals. • The Stanley Town Centre Area Action Plan - will support those initiatives currently underway and those likely to take place in the future in order to achieve the regeneration of Stanley Town Centre. An Issues and Options document was produced and consulted upon in March 2008. • The Consett Town Centre Area Action Plan - will provide the framework to enable the Town Centre to fulfil its potential as an area of opportunity by addressing issues such as the quality of the built environment and connectivity. • The Barnard Castle Town Centre Area Action Plan - will only be produced if it becomes clear that the Core Strategy cannot effectively deliver the proposals in the Barnard Castle Vision. It would support initiatives currently underway and those likely to take place in the future, to achieve the future development of Barnard Castle. • The Chester-le-Street Area Action Plan - will only be produced if it becomes clear that the Core Strategy cannot effectively deliver the proposals in the Chester-le-Street Town Centre Master plan. It would support initiatives currently underway and those likely to take place in the future, to achieve the future development of Chester-le-Street. 4 Purpose of Technical Paper 1.8 In developing the LDF, twenty three technical papers have been prepared. These are set out below. There are no specific papers for Climate Change or Regeneration, but these key issues are “golden threads” running through all the others. The papers are: No. 14: Energy Efficiency & No. 1: Housing Renewable Energy No. 2: Tourism No. 15: Delivery & Infrastructure No. 3: Heritage No. 16: Rural Dimension (Rural No. 4: Design and Local Proofing) Distinctiveness No. 17: Employment, Education & No. 5: Open Space, Recreation, Skills Leisure and Play No. 18: Deprivation (inc. Health, No. 6: Settlements & Green Belt Community Safety, No. 7: Community & Cultural Neighbourhood Quality, Income, Facilities Crime & Disorder) No. 8: Retail & Town Centres No. 19: Waste No. 9: Diversity No. 20: Minerals No. 10: Water No. 21: Transport and Accessibility No. 11: Community Involvement No. 22: Landscape No. 12: Contamination and No. 23: Population and Pollution Demographics No. 13: Biodiversity & Geodiversity 5 Executive Summary/Overview 1.9 The Minerals technical paper provides information and data relating to the need for new mineral working in County Durham in the period to 2030 (the time period for the County Durham Plan). • It explains why minerals are important and why their extraction is essential to the delivery of new development (including new housing, employment, retail development and the roads) and the repair and maintenance of the existing built environment in the County; • It explains the policy context within which policies for minerals planning have to be prepared. It highlights the current national, regional and local planning policy context and highlights key supporting strategies through which planning for minerals can contribute; • It provides an essential overview of County Durham’s complex geology and explains the extent of mineral resources in the County and existing mineral working; and • It seeks to scope the range of minerals policy content which must be included within the County Durham Plan (in particular the Core Strategy DPD and the Minerals and Waste Policies and Allocations DPD) in order to ensure that planning for minerals is properly addressed and found sound by the Planning Inspectorate. Wherever possible, it sets out the future need for aggregates such as crushed rock and sand and gravel and non aggregates such as brick clay, natural building stone and a range of other minerals excluding energy minerals. It discusses the need for the Core Strategy DPD to provide broad spatial guidance as to where new mineral working should be located. It addresses in detail a range of policy areas which must be addressed by the County Durham Plan including the approach that will need to be devised to determine new planning applications to discrete policy areas such as protecting local communities and the environment and climate change.
Recommended publications
  • Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale Part of VC65

    Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale Part of VC65

    Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale part of VC65 JOHN L. DURKIN MSc. MIEEM BSBI Recorder for County Durham 25 May Avenue. Winlaton Mill, Blaydon, NE21 6SF [email protected] Contents Introduction to the rare plants register Notes on plant distribution and protection The individual species accounts in alphabetical order Site Index First published 2010. This is the 2011, second edition. Improvements in the 2011 edition include- An additional 10% records, most of these more recent and more precise. One kilometre resolution maps for upland and coastal species. My thanks to Bob Ellis for advice on mapping. The ―County Scarce‖ species are now incorporated into the main text. Hieracium is now included. This edition is ―regionally aligned‖, that is, several species which are county rare in Northumberland, but were narrowly rejected for the Durham first edition, are now included. There is now a site index. Cover picture—Dark Red Helleborine at Bishop Middleham Quarry, its premier British site. Introduction Many counties are in the process of compiling a County Rare Plant Register, to assist in the study and conservation of their rare species. The process is made easier if the county has a published Flora and a strong Biological Records Centre, and Durham is fortunate to have Gordon Graham's Flora and the Durham Wildlife Trust‘s ―Recorder" system. We also have a Biodiversity project, based at Rainton Meadows, to carry out conservation projects to protect the rare species. The purpose of this document is to introduce the Rare Plant Register and to give an account of the information that it holds, and the species to be included.
  • DM-15-02063-Turbine 2 Punder Gill, Item 5B

    DM-15-02063-Turbine 2 Punder Gill, Item 5B

    Planning Services COMMITTEE REPORT APPLICATION DETAILS APPLICATION NO: DM/15/02063/FPA Erection of turbine no. 2 a 46.3m tip height turbine with FULL APPLICATION DESCRIPTION: associated access and sub-station (one of two turbines sought under two planning applications) NAME OF APPLICANT: Mr M Thompson ADDRESS: Pundergill, Rutherford Lane, Brignall, Barnard Castle ELECTORAL DIVISION: Barnard Castle West Henry Jones, Senior Planning Officer CASE OFFICER: [email protected], 03000 263960 DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE AND PROPOSALS The Site 1. The application site comprises agricultural land that lies approximately 180m to the south of the A66 and 200m to the west of Rutherford Lane. The watercourse of Punder Gill runs roughly east west to the south of the site. A large copse of trees stands immediately to the west of the site. 2. The nearest residential properties outwith the applicants control are situated approximately 215m to the north east at North Bitts, 520m to the east at Dent House Farm, 395m to the west at South Flats Farm and 565m to the south at Timpton Hill Farm. Dent House farmhouse and its adjacent outbuilding is a grade II listed building. The nearest Public Right of Way (PROW) is No.5 Brignall which commences/terminates on the eastern side of Rutherford Lane 220m south east of the application site. 3. The south eastern extent of the North Pennines AONB lies approximately 2.1km to the south of the site, whilst the site itself is designated as an Area of High Landscape value in the Teasdale Local Plan. The nearest site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) lies approximately 1.5km to the west of the site.
  • Contents Hawthorn Dene, 1, 5-Jul-1924

    Contents Hawthorn Dene, 1, 5-Jul-1924

    Northern Naturalists’ Union Field Meeting Reports- 1924-2005 Contents Hawthorn Dene, 1, 5-jul-1924 .............................. 10 Billingham Marsh, 2, 13-jun-1925 ......................... 13 Sweethope Lough, 3, 11-jul-1925 ........................ 18 The Sneap, 4, 12-jun-1926 ................................... 24 Great Ayton, 5, 18-jun-1927 ................................. 28 Gibside, 6, 23-jul-1927 ......................................... 28 Langdon Beck, 7, 9-jun-1928 ............................... 29 Hawthorn Dene, 8, 5-jul-1928 .............................. 33 Frosterley, 9 ......................................................... 38 The Sneap, 10, 1-jun-1929 ................................... 38 Allenheads, 11, 6-july-1929 .................................. 43 Dryderdale, 12, 14-jun-1930 ................................. 46 Blanchland, 13, 12-jul-1930 .................................. 49 Devil's Water, 14, 15-jun-1931 ............................. 52 Egglestone, 15, 11-jul-1931 ................................. 53 Windlestone Park, 16, June? ............................... 55 Edmondbyers, 17, 16-jul-1932 ............................. 57 Stanhope and Frosterley, 18, 5-jun-1932 ............. 58 The Sneap, 19, 15-jul-1933 .................................. 61 Pigdon Banks, 20, 1-jun-1934 .............................. 62 Greatham Marsh, 21, 21-jul-1934 ........................ 64 Blanchland, 22, 15-jun-1935 ................................ 66 Dryderdale, 23, ..................................................... 68 Raby Park,
  • Flora of Deepdale 2020

    Flora of Deepdale 2020

    Flora of Deepdale 2020 John Durkin MSC. MCIEEM www.durhamnature.co.uk [email protected] Introduction Deepdale is a side valley of the River Tees, joining the Tees at Barnard Castle. Its moorland catchment area is north of the A66 road across the Pennines. The lower three miles of the dale is a steep-sided rocky wooded valley. The nature reserve includes about half of this area. Deepdale has been designated as a Local Wildlife Site by Durham County Council. Deepdale is one of four large (more than 100 hectare) woods in Teesdale. These are important landscape-scale habitat features which I have termed “Great Woods”. The four Teesdale Great Woods are closely linked to each other, and are predominantly “ancient semi-natural” woods, both of these features increasing their value for wildlife. The other three Teesdale Great Woods are the Teesbank Woods upstream of Barnard Castle to Eggleston, the Teesbank Woods downstream from Barnard Castle to Gainford, and the woods along the River Greta at Brignall Banks. The habitats and wildlife of the Teesdale four are largely similar, with each having its particular distinctiveness. The Teesbank Woods upstream of Barnard Castle have been described in a booklet “A guide to the Natural History of the Tees Bank Woods between Barnard Castle and Cotherstone” by Margaret Morton and Margaret Bradshaw. Most of these areas have been designated as Local Wildlife Sites. Two areas, “Shipley and Great Wood” near Eggleston, and most of Brignall Banks have the higher designation, “Site of Special Scientific Interest”. There are about 22 Great Woods in County Durham, mainly in the well- wooded Derwent Valley, with four along the River Wear, three large coastal denes and the four in Teesdale.
  • County Durham Plan (Adopted 2020)

    County Durham Plan (Adopted 2020)

    County Durham Plan ADOPTED 2020 Contents Foreword 5 1 Introduction 7 Neighbourhood Plans 7 Assessing Impacts 8 Duty to Cooperate: Cross-Boundary Issues 9 County Durham Plan Key Diagram and Monitoring 10 2 What the County Durham Plan is Seeking to Achieve 11 3 Vision and Objectives 14 Delivering Sustainable Development 18 4 How Much Development and Where 20 Quantity of Development (How Much) 20 Spatial Distribution of Development (Where) 29 5 Core Principles 71 Building a Strong Competitive Economy 71 Ensuring the Vitality of Town Centres 78 Supporting a Prosperous Rural Economy 85 Delivering a Wide Choice of High Quality Homes 98 Protecting Green Belt Land 124 Sustainable Transport 127 Supporting High Quality Infrastructure 138 Requiring Good Design 150 Promoting Healthy Communities 158 Meeting the Challenge of Climate Change, Flooding and Coastal Change 167 Conserving and Enhancing the Natural and Historic Environment 185 Minerals and Waste 212 Appendices A Strategic Policies 259 B Table of Superseded Policies 261 C Coal Mining Risk Assessments, Minerals Assessments and Minerals and/or Waste 262 Infrastructure Assessment D Safeguarding Mineral Resources and Safeguarded Minerals and Waste Sites 270 E Glossary of Terms 279 CDP Adopted Version 2020 Contents List of County Durham Plan Policies Policy 1 Quantity of New Development 20 Policy 2 Employment Land 30 Policy 3 Aykley Heads 38 Policy 4 Housing Allocations 47 Policy 5 Durham City's Sustainable Urban Extensions 61 Policy 6 Development on Unallocated Sites 68 Policy 7 Visitor Attractions
  • Sedgefield Local Plan Environment Chapter

    Sedgefield Local Plan Environment Chapter

    Sedgefield Borough Local Plan Page 1 ENVIRONMENT The Borough consists of distinctive landscape areas that together create its particular character and provide the setting for the built environment of the various towns and villages. Most of the towns and villages in the Borough developed rapidly in response to growth in industry and coal mining over the last 100 years and contain relics of the industrial past; some show evidence of their agricultural origins. Parts of twelve towns and villages are designated conservation areas. There are over 170 listed buildings of architectural or historic interest. The built environment provides the background to where people live, work and spend much of their leisure time and helps to create the identity of different places. The natural environment consists primarily of the countryside between and around settlements but also areas of open space within towns and villages. The countryside is mainly in agricultural use but is also a valuable resource for recreation, leisure and wildlife. The open spaces within settlements are of value for a variety of uses and provide an attractive setting to built development. Within the countryside there are areas recognised for their special quality and interest. There are four areas of historic landscape, three of which are designated as conservation areas, seven Sites of Special Scientific Interest and four scheduled ancient monuments. The landscape is varied and is divided into four characteristic areas: the Magnesian Limestone escarpment, the River Wear Valley Shelf, and River Wear Valley Area of Landscape Value, and the Southern and Eastern Lowlands. The Borough is fortunate in that there is little derelict land remaining from its industrial past.
  • Durham Rare Plant Register 2016

    Durham Rare Plant Register 2016

    County Durham Rare Plant Register 2016 JOHN L. DURKIN MSc. MCIEEM BSBI Recorder for County Durham 25 May Avenue. Winlaton Mill, Blaydon, NE21 6SF [email protected] www.durhamnature.co.uk Contents Introduction to the rare plants register Notes on plant distribution and protection The individual species accounts in alphabetical order Site Index First published 2010. This is the 2016, fourth edition of the “RPR”, dedicated to Keith Cunningham, who helped so much with the early databases and in many other ways. Improvements in this edition include- The new English Red List is incorporated into this edition. An additional 10% records, most of these more recent and more precise. Cover picture—Bird’s Eye Primrose at Widdybank Fell. Introduction Most counties are in the process of compiling a County Rare Plant Register, to assist in the study and conservation of their rare species. The process is made easier if the county has a published Flora and a strong Biological Records Centre, and Durham is fortunate to have Gordon Graham's Flora and the Durham Wildlife Trust’s “Recorder" system. We have also had a Biodiversity project, based at Rainton Meadows, which until 2013 carried out conservation projects to protect the rare species. It is hoped that the “RPR” will act as a stimulus for local botanists to make special efforts to improve the database by recording these species. The register will be used to increase our understanding of the status and distribution of the rare species, and to aid and promote their conservation. Species Covered Three groups of vascular plant species are included.
  • Limestone Landscapes: a Geodiversity Audit and Action Plan for The

    Limestone Landscapes: a Geodiversity Audit and Action Plan for The

    Limestone Landscapes - a geodiversity audit and action plan for the Durham Magnesian Limestone Plateau Geology and Landscape England Programme Open Report OR/09/007 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGY AND LANDSCAPE ENGLAND PROGRAMME OPEN REPORT OR/09/007 Limestone Landscapes - a geodiversity audit and action The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data are used plan for the Durham Magnesian with the permission of the Con- troller of Her Majesty’s Station- ery Office. Limestone Plateau Licence No: 100017897/ 2009. Keywords geodiversity, Durham, Permian, D J D Lawrence Limestone, Landscape. National Grid Reference Editor SW corner 429800,521000 Centre point 438000,544000 A H Cooper NE corner 453400,568000 Front cover The Magnesian Limestone at Marsden Bay Bibliographical reference LAWRENCE, D J D. 2009. Limestone Landscapes - a geodiversity audit and action plan for the Durham Magnesian Limestone Plateau. British Geological Survey Open Report, OR/09/007. 114pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Sur- vey, Keyworth, E-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. Maps and diagrams in this book use topography based on Ord- nance
  • Tees Valley Statement of Transport Ambition Strategic Environmental Assessment

    Tees Valley Statement of Transport Ambition Strategic Environmental Assessment

    Tees Valley Statement of Transport Ambition Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report Tees Valley Statement of Transport Ambition Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report JMP Consultants Limited Minerva House East Parade Leeds LS1 5PS T 0113 244 4347 F 0113 242 3753 E [email protected] www.jmp.co.uk Job No. NEA6082 Report No. 2 Prepared by AD/JJ Verified MR Approved by MR Status Final Issue No. 1 Date 28 February 2011 Tees Valley Statement of Transport Ambition Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report Contents Amendments Record This document has been issued and amended as follows: Status/Revision Revision description Issue Number Approved By Date Draft For TVU approval 1 MR 18/02/2011 Final For consultation 2 MR 28/02/2011 Contents 1 NON – TECHNICAL SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 The SEA Process ....................................................................................................................... 1 Consultation ................................................................................................................................ 4 2 CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................... 5 Strategic Environmental Assessment ........................................................................................
  • County Durham Plan Preferred Options 2018

    County Durham Plan Preferred Options 2018

    County Durham Plan Preferred Options 2018 Contents Foreword 4 1 Introduction 6 Stages of Local Plan Preparation and Next Steps 7 How do I get involved? 7 Neighbourhood Plans 8 Assessing Impacts 9 Duty to Cooperate: Cross-Boundary Issues 10 Monitoring 10 2 What the County Durham Plan is seeking to Achieve 11 3 Vision and Objectives 14 Delivering Sustainable Development 17 General Development Principles 19 Policy 1 - General Development Principles 19 4 How Much Development and Where 22 Quantity of Development (How Much) 22 Policy 2 - Quantity of Development 22 Spatial Distribution of Development (Where) 30 Distribution of Employment 30 Policy 3 - Employment Land 30 Policy 4 - Aykley Heads 38 Distribution of Housing 43 Policy 5 - Housing Allocations 47 Policy 6 - Durham City's Sustainable Urban Extensions 61 Policy 7 - Development on Unallocated Sites in the Built Up Area 68 County Durham Plan Preferred Options Contents 5 Core Principles 70 Building a strong competitive economy 71 Durham University 71 Visitor Economy Introduction 72 Policy 8 - Visitor Attractions 73 Policy 9 - Visitor Accommodation 75 Ensuring the vitality of town centres 77 Policy 10 - Retail Hierarchy and Town Centre Development 78 Supporting a prosperous rural economy 84 Policy 11 - Development in the Countryside 85 Policy 12 - Rural Housing and Employment Exception Sites 89 Policy 13 - Permanent Rural Workers’ Dwellings 91 Policy 14 - Equestrian Development 93 Policy 15 - Best and Most Versatile Agricultural Land and Soil Resources 95 Delivering a wide choice of high
  • Joint Local Aggregate Assessment for County Durham, Northumberland and Tyne and Wear (April 2018) Contents

    Joint Local Aggregate Assessment for County Durham, Northumberland and Tyne and Wear (April 2018) Contents

    Joint Local Aggregates Assessment for County Durham, Northumberland and Tyne and Wear April 2018 Prepared jointly by Durham County Council Northumberland County Council Gateshead Council Northumberland National Park Authority Newcastle City Council South Tyneside Council North Tyneside Council Sunderland City Council Contents Executive Summary 3 Aggregates in the Joint LAA area 3 Demand indicators 3 Balance between supply and demand 4 Inter mineral planning authority issues 5 Dashboard 6 1. Introduction 9 2. Background/context 10 What are aggregates? 10 What is a Local Aggregate Assessment? 10 Joint approach to the Local Aggregate 11 Assessment Managed Aggregates Supply System 12 Timescale for the Local Aggregate 13 Assessment Overview of the data used 13 3. Aggregate resources, consents and 14 allocations County Durham 14 Northumberland 22 Tyne and Wear 27 4. Aggregate sales and permitted reserves 31 Sand and gravel (from quarries in the Joint 31 LAA area) Crushed rock (from quarries in Joint LAA 36 area) Marine sand and gravel 43 Imports of crushed rock by sea 44 Imports and exports 44 Recycled and secondary aggregates 49 5. Forecasting demand 51 A comparison of sales averages 51 Recent sales and pre-recession sales 52 Local factors influencing demand 53 Recommended method and provision 59 6. Assessment of supply options 61 Land-won primary aggregates - County 61 Durham Joint Local Aggregate Assessment for County Durham, Northumberland and Tyne and Wear (April 2018) Contents Land-won primary aggregates - 64 Northumberland Land-won primary aggregates - Tyne and 66 Wear Marine dredged sand and gravel 69 Imports of crushed rock by sea 70 Recycled and secondary aggregates 70 Imports 70 7.
  • Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale Part of VC65

    Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale Part of VC65

    Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale part of VC65 JOHN L. DURKIN MSc. MIEEM BSBI Recorder for County Durham 25 May Avenue. Winlaton Mill, Blaydon, NE21 6SF [email protected] Contents Introduction to the rare plants register Notes on plant distribution and protection The individual species accounts in alphabetical order Site Index First published 2010. This is the 2011, second edition. Improvements in the 2011 edition include- An additional 10% records, most of these more recent and more precise. One kilometre resolution maps for upland and coastal species. My thanks to Bob Ellis for advice on mapping. The ―County Scarce‖ species are now incorporated into the main text. Hieracium is now included. This edition is ―regionally aligned‖, that is, several species which are county rare in Northumberland, but were narrowly rejected for the Durham first edition, are now included. There is now a site index. Cover picture—Dark Red Helleborine at Bishop Middleham Quarry, its premier British site. Introduction Many counties are in the process of compiling a County Rare Plant Register, to assist in the study and conservation of their rare species. The process is made easier if the county has a published Flora and a strong Biological Records Centre, and Durham is fortunate to have Gordon Graham's Flora and the Durham Wildlife Trust‘s ―Recorder" system. We also have a Biodiversity project, based at Rainton Meadows, to carry out conservation projects to protect the rare species. The purpose of this document is to introduce the Rare Plant Register and to give an account of the information that it holds, and the species to be included.