DOCSLIB.ORG

Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale Part of VC65

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale Part of VC65 Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale part of VC65 JOHN L. DURKIN MSc. MIEEM BSBI Recorder for County Durham 25 May Avenue. Winlaton Mill, Blaydon, NE21 6SF [email protected] Contents Introduction to the rare plants register Notes on plant distribution and protection The individual species accounts in alphabetical order Site Index First published 2010. This is the 2011, second edition. Improvements in the 2011 edition include- An additional 10% records, most of these more recent and more precise. One kilometre resolution maps for upland and coastal species. My thanks to Bob Ellis for advice on mapping. The ―County Scarce‖ species are now incorporated into the main text. Hieracium is now included. This edition is ―regionally aligned‖, that is, several species which are county rare in Northumberland, but were narrowly rejected for the Durham first edition, are now included. There is now a site index. Cover picture—Dark Red Helleborine at Bishop Middleham Quarry, its premier British site. Introduction Many counties are in the process of compiling a County Rare Plant Register, to assist in the study and conservation of their rare species. The process is made easier if the county has a published Flora and a strong Biological Records Centre, and Durham is fortunate to have Gordon Graham's Flora and the Durham Wildlife Trust‘s ―Recorder" system. We also have a Biodiversity project, based at Rainton Meadows, to carry out conservation projects to protect the rare species. The purpose of this document is to introduce the Rare Plant Register and to give an account of the information that it holds, and the species to be included. It is then hoped that this will act as a stimulus for local botanists to make special efforts to improve the database by recording these species. The register will be used to increase our understanding of the status and distribution of the rare species, and to aid and promote their conservation. This account is based mainly on the "Flora and Vegetation of County Durham", the recording effort that has gone into the Botanical Society of the British Isles "Atlas 2000" project, and the considerable recent survey effort at the Durham Biodiversity Partnership. New records, amendments and updates would be very welcome. Species Covered Two groups of vascular plant species are included. Firstly, the nationally rare species listed in the BSBI/IUCN list. These are classified as ―Critically Endangered‖, ―Endangered‖, ―Near Threatened‖, ―Rare‖, ―Vulnerable‖ and ―Scarce‖. Durham has an exceptionally large number of these, 136 in all, because of the importance of the Teesdale flora. These species are mainly those that were listed in the ―Red Data Book ―and in ―Scarce Plants in Britain‖. These two publications give ecological information on the species covered, which will is not repeated here. Secondly, to cover species of local rather than national importance, a species qualifies as ―locally rare‖ if it has been recorded in three or less sites in the countyor ―locally scarce‖ species with less than 10 sites in the county. This would include about 100 species in Durham. For the purposes of the current edition, I am excluding some casual, hortal and/or introduced species, and some species that have not been recorded for some time. The lists would otherwise, for example, include many long-extinct ballast aliens. ―Critical―species of Taraxacum and Rubus are not included in this edition. A "site" has also been defined as a "Wells" site. A "Wells" site is a floating kilometre square, so that, for example, most of the rare species in Hawthorn Dene have a single Wells site there, even though plants may be on both sides of a kilometre grid line or may be present in two "tetrads". The number of Wells sites gives a better indication of a plant's scarcity. Information Given For all of BSBI/IUCN listed species and for some of the Locally Rare species the following details are given- Common name Scientific Name National Status Local Status Range in Durham Significance of the Durham population. Site Records with location, recorder and year. Protection status of the current sites County map of locations If appropriate for selected species- Photograph of typical local habitat Photograph of plant in local habitat. Geographical Area The Durham Rare Plant Register covers the Watsonian Vice County of Durham, numbered as ―66‖, plus the Teesdale area of VC65. The VC65 area is included because it is now part of the administrative county of Durham, and because the important Upper Teesdale National Nature Reserve is bisected by the VC boundary. This nationally important botanical area holds a large proportion of the British populations of a number of Red Data Book species, with most of these occurring on both sides of the Tees. The Upper Teesdale NNR also holds most or all of the English distribution of several species of predominantly Scottish distribution, such as Scottish Asphodel, Alpine Willowherb and Alpine Meadow Rue. Sites in VC65 are indicated as such in the text. Contributors The Register is compiled by John Liam Durkin, from about 500,000 records including many extracted from ―Recorder‖ by Keith Cunningham, from Gordon Graham‘s Durham Flora, from Andy McLay‘s survey of Gateshead district, from contributions from many recorders via the BSBI system, and from other written sources. These records have been compiled into the ―Mapmate‖ recording system. The Alchemilla species notes follow the text of articles written recently by Dr Margaret Bradshaw. Many of the Upper Teesdale records are, of course, also from Dr Bradshaw. Photographs that have no credits are by John Durkin. Several high quality photographs were kindly provided by UKWildflowers.com, and are individually credited. National Categories Critically Endangered 5 Endangered 14 Near Threatened 23 Rare 7 Scarce 50 Vulnerable 34 Total 133 Local Categories Locally rare 36 Locally scarce 75 Total 111 Range Where the range is given as ―Upper Teesdale NNR‖, this means that the entire range in Durham is within the National Nature Reserve. ―Upper Teesdale‖ means Teesdale above Middleton, ―Teesdale‖ means below Middleton. ―Dales‖ means the plant occurs in the west of the county, in Teesdale, Weardale, and/or the Derwent Valley. ―Lowland‖ covers the east of the county. ―Both Limestones‖ means that the plant grows on both the Carboniferous Limestones of the west of the county, and the Magnesian Limestone of the east. Oblong Woodsia, Woodsia ilvensis in Teesdale The Species Accounts; Introduction Text The text is intentionally brief, and usually summarises distribution and highlights any trends. More details of historic records and recorders can be found in the Durham Flora. More details of the biology of these species can be found in the Vascular Plants Red Data Book and in Scarce Plants in Britain. The species are listed in Stace 3 alphabetical order. The Records For each species, a table of the most recent record for each grid reference is given. The grid references vary considerably in definition- most are to the nearest 100m, a few are only to 1 kilometre, and many of the most recent are GPS readings accurate to less than 10 metres. In time, all of the modern records will be at 10 metre accuracy, unless there is a good reason for not publicising this. For most taxa, only records since 1970 are listed. Some of tables are quite large, particularly for Sesleria and for the Alchemillas. The option of excluding these tables in favour of a map and description was rejected. Though they take up a lot of space, they reflect the importance of Durham for rare species. Protected Status of Sites Each row in the tables of records is background coloured according to the protected status of the site- Most of the records are from NNRs and SSSIs, and are uncoloured/white. Local Wildlife Sites, formerly known as County Wildlife Sites or Sites of Nature Conservation Importance, are coloured in green. Sites with no protected status are coloured red, for danger ! There are several uncertainties here. Some records, particularly older ones, could be inside or outside the designated site. For most of the LWSs, there are not easily accessible, up to date boundary maps. LWSs are currently being reviewed by local authorities, so there may be changes in the pipeline. In this first assessment, about 60% of the listed records are in SSSIs/NNRs. Just under 20% are in Local Wildlife Sites, and just over 20% are in sites with no designation. Being within a designated site is not the whole picture for the conservation of a rare species, but it‘s a good start. There are some discrepancies in the protection afforded to different species, and these are highlighted below and in the species accounts. Recorders Some of the recorders‘ names have been abbreviated- CNFC Cleveland Naturalists Field Club DTNFC Darlington and Teesdale Naturalists Field Club DWT Durham Wildlife Trust GGG Rev. Gordon Graham JWHH Professor J W Heslop Harrison NCC Nature Conservancy Council NNU Northern Naturalists Union The Maps Many of the species are mapped at tetrad level. Solid dots are records since 1990, open dots are older records, from all periods. Sometimes this shows quite distinct declines in the distribution of a species- see, for instance, Primula farinosa and Astragalus danicus. In the rare cases of expanding ranges, this is covered in the text. Species with a distribution solely in the west ―NY‖ part of the county or in the eastern part of County Durham are mapped with larger scale maps of the relevant part of the county, and on a one kilometre square basis, again with solid dots showing records since 1990. These maps also show the rivers, reservoirs and land over 600 metres.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale Part of VC65
    Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale part of VC65 JOHN L. DURKIN MSc. MIEEM BSBI Recorder for County Durham 25 May Avenue. Winlaton Mill, Blaydon, NE21 6SF [email protected] Contents Introduction to the rare plants register Notes on plant distribution and protection The individual species accounts in alphabetical order Site Index First published 2010. This is the 2011, second edition. Improvements in the 2011 edition include- An additional 10% records, most of these more recent and more precise. One kilometre resolution maps for upland and coastal species. My thanks to Bob Ellis for advice on mapping. The ―County Scarce‖ species are now incorporated into the main text. Hieracium is now included. This edition is ―regionally aligned‖, that is, several species which are county rare in Northumberland, but were narrowly rejected for the Durham first edition, are now included. There is now a site index. Cover picture—Dark Red Helleborine at Bishop Middleham Quarry, its premier British site. Introduction Many counties are in the process of compiling a County Rare Plant Register, to assist in the study and conservation of their rare species. The process is made easier if the county has a published Flora and a strong Biological Records Centre, and Durham is fortunate to have Gordon Graham's Flora and the Durham Wildlife Trust‘s ―Recorder" system. We also have a Biodiversity project, based at Rainton Meadows, to carry out conservation projects to protect the rare species. The purpose of this document is to introduce the Rare Plant Register and to give an account of the information that it holds, and the species to be included.
    [Show full text]
  • Accounting for National Nature Reserves
    Natural England Research Report NERR078 Accounting for National Nature Reserves: A Natural Capital Account of the National Nature Reserves managed by Natural England www.gov.uk/naturalACCOUNTING FOR-england NATIONAL NATURE RESERVES Natural England Research Report NERR078 Accounting for National Nature Reserves: A Natural Capital Account of the National Nature Reserves managed by Natural England Tim Sunderland1, Ruth Waters1, Dan Marsh2, Cat Hudson1 and Jane Lusardi1 Published 21st February 2019 1 Natural England 2 University of Waikato, New Zealand This report is published by Natural England under the Open Government Licence - OGLv3.0 for public sector information. You are encouraged to use, and reuse, information subject to certain conditions. For details of the licence visit Copyright. Natural England photographs are only available for non commercial purposes. If any other information such as maps or data cannot be used commercially this will be made clear within the report. ISBN 978-1-78354-518-6 © Natural England 2018 ACCOUNTING FOR NATIONAL NATURE RESERVES Project details This report should be cited as: SUNDERLAND, T., WATERS, R.D., MARSH, D. V. K., HUDSON, C., AND LUSARDI, J. (2018). Accounting for National Nature Reserves: A natural capital account of the National Nature Reserves managed by Natural England. Natural England Research Report, Number 078 Project manager Tim Sunderland Principal Specialist in Economics Horizon House Bristol BS1 5TL [email protected] Acknowledgements We would like to thank everyone who contributed to this report both within Natural England and externally. ii Natural England Research Report 078 Foreword England’s National Nature Reserves (NNRs) are the crown jewels of our natural heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Footpath Booklet
    The Durham Heritage Coastal footpath The Countryside Code Respect, protect, enjoy! Respect other people l Consider the local community and other people enjoying the outdoors. l Leave gates and property as you find them and follow paths unless wider access is available. Protect the natural environment l Leave no trace of your visit and take your litter home. l Keep dogs under effective control Enjoy the outdoors l Plan ahead and be prepared. l Follow advice and local signs. Scan the code to find out more about Durham Heritage Coast. Public Transport Information For information on getting to the coast using public transport, www.traveline.info please go to , or telephone 0871 200 22 33. Introduction Welcome to Durham’s Heritage Coastal Footpath, an 11 mile walking route following the England Coast Path National Trail. Discover and explore spectacular grasslands, superb coastal denes and uncover the rich heritage that has shaped this coastline into a unique and fascinating place to be. Why is it so special? Durham’s Coastline is unique. Nowhere else in Britain has such a wonderful display of Magnesian Limestone Coastal Grasslands supporting a vast array of wildflowers and insects. The Northern Brown Argus butterfly can be found amongst these grasslands in the summer months and flowers such as orchids, Bloody Cranesbill, Thrift, Birds’ Eye Primrose and Common Rock Rose are a characteristic sight on the grassy cliff tops. The sound of Skylarks and Lapwings in the summer are a musical treat not to be missed. The coastal denes created at the end of the last ice age support some of the most natural woodland in North East England and provide a valuable habitat for mammals such as deer, foxes, badgers and bats.
    [Show full text]
  • DM-15-02063-Turbine 2 Punder Gill, Item 5B
    Planning Services COMMITTEE REPORT APPLICATION DETAILS APPLICATION NO: DM/15/02063/FPA Erection of turbine no. 2 a 46.3m tip height turbine with FULL APPLICATION DESCRIPTION: associated access and sub-station (one of two turbines sought under two planning applications) NAME OF APPLICANT: Mr M Thompson ADDRESS: Pundergill, Rutherford Lane, Brignall, Barnard Castle ELECTORAL DIVISION: Barnard Castle West Henry Jones, Senior Planning Officer CASE OFFICER: [email protected], 03000 263960 DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE AND PROPOSALS The Site 1. The application site comprises agricultural land that lies approximately 180m to the south of the A66 and 200m to the west of Rutherford Lane. The watercourse of Punder Gill runs roughly east west to the south of the site. A large copse of trees stands immediately to the west of the site. 2. The nearest residential properties outwith the applicants control are situated approximately 215m to the north east at North Bitts, 520m to the east at Dent House Farm, 395m to the west at South Flats Farm and 565m to the south at Timpton Hill Farm. Dent House farmhouse and its adjacent outbuilding is a grade II listed building. The nearest Public Right of Way (PROW) is No.5 Brignall which commences/terminates on the eastern side of Rutherford Lane 220m south east of the application site. 3. The south eastern extent of the North Pennines AONB lies approximately 2.1km to the south of the site, whilst the site itself is designated as an Area of High Landscape value in the Teasdale Local Plan. The nearest site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) lies approximately 1.5km to the west of the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Hawthorn Dene, 1, 5-Jul-1924
    Northern Naturalists’ Union Field Meeting Reports- 1924-2005 Contents Hawthorn Dene, 1, 5-jul-1924 .............................. 10 Billingham Marsh, 2, 13-jun-1925 ......................... 13 Sweethope Lough, 3, 11-jul-1925 ........................ 18 The Sneap, 4, 12-jun-1926 ................................... 24 Great Ayton, 5, 18-jun-1927 ................................. 28 Gibside, 6, 23-jul-1927 ......................................... 28 Langdon Beck, 7, 9-jun-1928 ............................... 29 Hawthorn Dene, 8, 5-jul-1928 .............................. 33 Frosterley, 9 ......................................................... 38 The Sneap, 10, 1-jun-1929 ................................... 38 Allenheads, 11, 6-july-1929 .................................. 43 Dryderdale, 12, 14-jun-1930 ................................. 46 Blanchland, 13, 12-jul-1930 .................................. 49 Devil's Water, 14, 15-jun-1931 ............................. 52 Egglestone, 15, 11-jul-1931 ................................. 53 Windlestone Park, 16, June? ............................... 55 Edmondbyers, 17, 16-jul-1932 ............................. 57 Stanhope and Frosterley, 18, 5-jun-1932 ............. 58 The Sneap, 19, 15-jul-1933 .................................. 61 Pigdon Banks, 20, 1-jun-1934 .............................. 62 Greatham Marsh, 21, 21-jul-1934 ........................ 64 Blanchland, 22, 15-jun-1935 ................................ 66 Dryderdale, 23, ..................................................... 68 Raby Park,
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of Deepdale 2020
    Flora of Deepdale 2020 John Durkin MSC. MCIEEM www.durhamnature.co.uk [email protected] Introduction Deepdale is a side valley of the River Tees, joining the Tees at Barnard Castle. Its moorland catchment area is north of the A66 road across the Pennines. The lower three miles of the dale is a steep-sided rocky wooded valley. The nature reserve includes about half of this area. Deepdale has been designated as a Local Wildlife Site by Durham County Council. Deepdale is one of four large (more than 100 hectare) woods in Teesdale. These are important landscape-scale habitat features which I have termed “Great Woods”. The four Teesdale Great Woods are closely linked to each other, and are predominantly “ancient semi-natural” woods, both of these features increasing their value for wildlife. The other three Teesdale Great Woods are the Teesbank Woods upstream of Barnard Castle to Eggleston, the Teesbank Woods downstream from Barnard Castle to Gainford, and the woods along the River Greta at Brignall Banks. The habitats and wildlife of the Teesdale four are largely similar, with each having its particular distinctiveness. The Teesbank Woods upstream of Barnard Castle have been described in a booklet “A guide to the Natural History of the Tees Bank Woods between Barnard Castle and Cotherstone” by Margaret Morton and Margaret Bradshaw. Most of these areas have been designated as Local Wildlife Sites. Two areas, “Shipley and Great Wood” near Eggleston, and most of Brignall Banks have the higher designation, “Site of Special Scientific Interest”. There are about 22 Great Woods in County Durham, mainly in the well- wooded Derwent Valley, with four along the River Wear, three large coastal denes and the four in Teesdale.
    [Show full text]
  • THE RURAL ECONOMY of NORTH EAST of ENGLAND M Whitby Et Al
    THE RURAL ECONOMY OF NORTH EAST OF ENGLAND M Whitby et al Centre for Rural Economy Research Report THE RURAL ECONOMY OF NORTH EAST ENGLAND Martin Whitby, Alan Townsend1 Matthew Gorton and David Parsisson With additional contributions by Mike Coombes2, David Charles2 and Paul Benneworth2 Edited by Philip Lowe December 1999 1 Department of Geography, University of Durham 2 Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle upon Tyne Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Scope of the Study 1 1.2 The Regional Context 3 1.3 The Shape of the Report 8 2. THE NATURAL RESOURCES OF THE REGION 2.1 Land 9 2.2 Water Resources 11 2.3 Environment and Heritage 11 3. THE RURAL WORKFORCE 3.1 Long Term Trends in Employment 13 3.2 Recent Employment Trends 15 3.3 The Pattern of Labour Supply 18 3.4 Aggregate Output per Head 23 4 SOCIAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL DYNAMICS 4.1 Distribution of Employment by Gender and Employment Status 25 4.2 Differential Trends in the Remoter Areas and the Coalfield Districts 28 4.3 Commuting Patterns in the North East 29 5 BUSINESS PERFORMANCE AND INFRASTRUCTURE 5.1 Formation and Turnover of Firms 39 5.2 Inward investment 44 5.3 Business Development and Support 46 5.4 Developing infrastructure 49 5.5 Skills Gaps 53 6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 55 References Appendices 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The scope of the study This report is on the rural economy of the North East of England1. It seeks to establish the major trends in rural employment and the pattern of labour supply.
    [Show full text]
  • North Pennines AONB High Nature Value Farming Research
    North Pennines AONB High Nature Value Farming Research A report for the North Pennines AONB partnership European Forum on Nature Conservation and Pastoralism and Cumulus Consultants Ltd. Mike Quinn, Creative Commons Licence North Pennines AONB High Nature Value Farming Research A report for the North Pennines AONB partnership European Forum on Nature Conservation and Pastoralism and Cumulus Consultants Ltd. December 2013 Report prepared by: Gwyn Jones, EFNCP Paul Silcock, CC Jonathan Brunyee, CC Jeni Pring, CC This report was commissioned by the North Pennines AONB Partnership. Its content is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of the funders. Thanks to Karen MacRae for proof reading, but all mistakes are the authors’. Thanks also to Rebecca Barrett for her enthusiasm and support and to Pat Thompson for help with bird data. European Forum on Nature Conservation and Cumulus Consultants Ltd, Pastoralism, The Palmers, Wormington Grange, 5/8 Ellishadder, Culnancnoc, Wormington, Broadway, Portree IV51 9JE Worcestershire. WR12 7NJ Telephone: +44 (0)788 411 6048 Telephone: +44 (0)1386 584950 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Internet: www.efncp.org Internet: www.cumulus-consultants.co.uk 2 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 5 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • County Durham Plan (Adopted 2020)
    County Durham Plan ADOPTED 2020 Contents Foreword 5 1 Introduction 7 Neighbourhood Plans 7 Assessing Impacts 8 Duty to Cooperate: Cross-Boundary Issues 9 County Durham Plan Key Diagram and Monitoring 10 2 What the County Durham Plan is Seeking to Achieve 11 3 Vision and Objectives 14 Delivering Sustainable Development 18 4 How Much Development and Where 20 Quantity of Development (How Much) 20 Spatial Distribution of Development (Where) 29 5 Core Principles 71 Building a Strong Competitive Economy 71 Ensuring the Vitality of Town Centres 78 Supporting a Prosperous Rural Economy 85 Delivering a Wide Choice of High Quality Homes 98 Protecting Green Belt Land 124 Sustainable Transport 127 Supporting High Quality Infrastructure 138 Requiring Good Design 150 Promoting Healthy Communities 158 Meeting the Challenge of Climate Change, Flooding and Coastal Change 167 Conserving and Enhancing the Natural and Historic Environment 185 Minerals and Waste 212 Appendices A Strategic Policies 259 B Table of Superseded Policies 261 C Coal Mining Risk Assessments, Minerals Assessments and Minerals and/or Waste 262 Infrastructure Assessment D Safeguarding Mineral Resources and Safeguarded Minerals and Waste Sites 270 E Glossary of Terms 279 CDP Adopted Version 2020 Contents List of County Durham Plan Policies Policy 1 Quantity of New Development 20 Policy 2 Employment Land 30 Policy 3 Aykley Heads 38 Policy 4 Housing Allocations 47 Policy 5 Durham City's Sustainable Urban Extensions 61 Policy 6 Development on Unallocated Sites 68 Policy 7 Visitor Attractions
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins and Treatment of Derelict Land in County Durham
    Durham E-Theses the origins and treatment of derelict land in county Durham Hartley, Derek How to cite: Hartley, Derek (1998) the origins and treatment of derelict land in county Durham, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4648/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk The origins and treatment of derelict land in County Durham DEREK HARTLEY The University of Durham Department of Geological Sciences January 1998 This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree ofM.Sc. in Environmental Management Practice The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without the written consent of the author and information derived from it should be acknowledged. This work is the copyright of Derek Hartley 1998 1 2 MAY 1998 ABSTRACT The study considers the programme of derelict land reclamation carried out in County Durham, which was largely dictated by considerations of economic development and visual impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature Conservation on a Shoestring
    Bulletin of the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management Issue 98 | December 2017 Nature Conservation on a Shoestring In this issue Conservation on a Shoestring: Working for Wildlife – Pantheon: A New Resource The Mutualistic Benefits of Environmental Partnerships for Invertebrate Survey University – Nature Reserve between Water Companies Standards and Analysis Collaborations and Wildlife Trusts Welcome Information Nature Conservation on a Shoestring In Practice No. 98 December 2017 Most CIEEM members will agree that a healthy, wildlife-rich natural world is valuable ISSN 1754-4882 in its own right as well as being the foundation of our wellbeing and prosperity; Editor we depend on it and it depends on us. Yet too many forces in the world are pulling Dr Gillian Kerby ([email protected]) wildlife and people apart, unnecessarily damaging natural systems, disrupting Internal contributions ecological processes and reducing biodiversity. The turbulence of the political climate coordinator opens up major risks but also presents new opportunities for nature conservation. Mr Jason Reeves ([email protected]) We have our work cut out to turn this chaos to the advantage of the natural world. Editorial Board Mr Jonathan Barnes, Dr Kate Bayley, The Wildlife Trusts believe that everyone deserves to live in a healthy environment, Dr Andrew Cherrill, Mr Dominic Coath, rich in wildlife and full of opportunities to enjoy the natural world. By working Mr Neil Harwood, Dr Caroline McParland, together, in the places that are closest and most important to us, people can change Mrs Kate Morris, Mr Paul Rooney, the natural world for the better – whoever and wherever we are – for ourselves and Mr Paul Scott, Miss Katrena Stanhope, Mr Darren Towers for future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Sedgefield Local Plan Environment Chapter
    Sedgefield Borough Local Plan Page 1 ENVIRONMENT The Borough consists of distinctive landscape areas that together create its particular character and provide the setting for the built environment of the various towns and villages. Most of the towns and villages in the Borough developed rapidly in response to growth in industry and coal mining over the last 100 years and contain relics of the industrial past; some show evidence of their agricultural origins. Parts of twelve towns and villages are designated conservation areas. There are over 170 listed buildings of architectural or historic interest. The built environment provides the background to where people live, work and spend much of their leisure time and helps to create the identity of different places. The natural environment consists primarily of the countryside between and around settlements but also areas of open space within towns and villages. The countryside is mainly in agricultural use but is also a valuable resource for recreation, leisure and wildlife. The open spaces within settlements are of value for a variety of uses and provide an attractive setting to built development. Within the countryside there are areas recognised for their special quality and interest. There are four areas of historic landscape, three of which are designated as conservation areas, seven Sites of Special Scientific Interest and four scheduled ancient monuments. The landscape is varied and is divided into four characteristic areas: the Magnesian Limestone escarpment, the River Wear Valley Shelf, and River Wear Valley Area of Landscape Value, and the Southern and Eastern Lowlands. The Borough is fortunate in that there is little derelict land remaining from its industrial past.
    [Show full text]