2017 Rehabilitation Monitoring Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2017 Rehabilitation Monitoring Report 2017 Rehabilitation Monitoring Report Report prepared for Bulga Coal Complex 12 October 2017 i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................ 1.1 2.0 Methods.............................................................................................. 2.1 2.1 Site Layout ............................................................................................................................ 2.3 2.2 Biometric Vegetation Sampling ............................................................................................ 2.3 2.3 Landscape Function Analysis ................................................................................................ 2.4 2.4 Pest Animals ......................................................................................................................... 2.5 3.0 Results and Discussion ........................................................................ 3.5 3.1 Biometric Vegetation Sampling ............................................................................................ 3.5 3.1.1 Grey Box-Ironbark Woodland ........................................................................................... 3.6 3.1.2 Ironbark-Spotted Gum-Grey Box Woodland .................................................................... 3.7 3.1.3 Swamp Oak Forest ............................................................................................................ 3.8 3.2 Landscape Function Analysis ................................................................................................ 3.9 3.2.1 Landscape Organisation Index ......................................................................................... 3.9 3.2.2 Soil Stability .................................................................................................................... 3.10 3.2.3 Soil Infiltration ................................................................................................................ 3.11 3.2.4 Soil Nutrients .................................................................................................................. 3.12 3.2.5 Sum of LFA ...................................................................................................................... 3.13 3.3 Pest Animals ....................................................................................................................... 3.14 3.4 Native/Exotic Plant Composition ....................................................................................... 3.14 3.5 Germination of Species from the Seed Mix ....................................................................... 3.16 3.5.1 Recommendations for Modification to Seed Mix .......................................................... 3.17 4.0 Rehabilitation Progress Towards Closure Criteria .............................. 4.18 5.0 Summary of Recommendations .......................................................... 5.1 6.0 References .......................................................................................... 6.2 ii FIGURES Figure 2.1 Location of 2017 Monitoring Sites and Target Vegetiaon Communities .......................... 2.2 Figure 2.2 Site Layout ........................................................................................................................ 2.3 Figure 3.1 Monitoring Sites Landscape Organisation Index ............................................................. 3.10 Figure 3.2 Monitoring Sites Soil Stability Value ............................................................................... 3.11 Figure 3.3 Monitoring Sites Soil Infiltration Values .......................................................................... 3.12 Figure 3.4 Monitoring Sites Soil Nutrient Values ............................................................................. 3.13 Figure 3.5 Monitoring Sites Sum of LFA Values ............................................................................... 3.13 Figure 3.6 Abundance of Native, Non-invasive Weed and Invasive Weed Species ......................... 3.15 APPENDICES Appendix 1 Schedule of Monitoring .................................................................................................. 6.3 Appendix 2 Results of Photo Monitoring ........................................................................................... 6.7 Appendix 3 Biometric Score ............................................................................................................ 6.12 Appendix 4 Flora Species List........................................................................................................... 6.14 Appendix 5 Seed Mixes .................................................................................................................... 6.20 iii 1.0 Introduction This document reports on the annual Rehabilitation Monitoring Program at Bulga Coal. Bulga Coal is located approximately 12 kilometres southwest of Singleton in the Upper Hunter Valley of New South Wales. Bulga Coal comprises two coal mining operations, being Bulga Open Cut (BOC) and Bulga Underground Operations (BUO). BOC incorporates the Coal Handling and Preparation Plant (CHPP) and BUO incorporates the Blakefield Mine. BOC and BUO forms the Bulga Coal Complex (BCC). BCC has recently revised the closure criteria for the operation as part of the closure planning for a Mining Operation Plan submission in 2017. Therefore, BCC was required to update the existing rehabilitation and ecological monitoring program to ensure that the data collected from the monitoring program directly relates to measures in the revised closure criteria. This document reports on the methods and results of the 2017 Rehabilitation Monitoring Program at BCC, which was undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the revised Rehabilitation Monitoring Procedure (Emergent Ecology 2017). 2.0 Methods The methodology adopted for the 2017 Rehabilitation Monitoring Program is outlined in the BCC Rehabilitation Monitoring Procedure (Emergent Ecology 2017). This methodology was developed in accordance with the BCC closure criteria, GCAA Completion Criteria and Rehabilitation Monitoring procedure (GCAA 2015) and Biometric methodology (DECCW 2011). The following sections outline the methods undertaken to complete the monitoring program. Field surveys for the BCC Rehabilitation Monitoring Program were undertaken from the 29 to 31 May 2017. Seven sites required monitoring in 2017, as shown in Table 2.1 and locations provided on Figure 2.1. The longer term schedule for all rehabilitation monitoring sites is provided as Appendix 1. Table 2.1 Monitoring Sites 2017 Site Vegetation Commencement Easting Northing Monitoring Type Name Community of Monitoring BM20 GBIW 324,666 6,387,133 Reference 2014 BM23 SOF 322,922 6,384,707 Reference 2014 BM25 ISGBW 322,151 6,377,683 Reference 2017 NB6 GBIW 321,082 6,384,632 Rehabilitation 2016 NVB1 GBIW 318,315 6,384,537 Rehabilitation 2015 NVB2 GBIW 319,823 6,380,432 Rehabilitation 2016 OTD1 ISGBW 322,180 6,379,337 Rehabilitation 2017 Vegetation community abbreviations: • GBIW: Grey Box-Ironbark Woodland • SOF: Swamp Oak Forest • ISGBW: Ironbark-Spotted Gum-Grey Box Woodland 2.1 Ü BM20 NB6 BM23 NVB1 C h a r l t o NVB2 n R o a d Legend OTD1 Monitoring Rehabilitation Site Reference Site Approved Disturbance Boundary Grey Box-Ironbark Woodland ad Ro ke Ironbark-Spotted Gum-Grey Box Woodland Bro Swamp Oak FOrest BM25 Pasture Void Water Public Road Kilometers 0 0.250.5 1 1.5 2 Figure 2.1. Location of 2017 Monitoring Sites and Target Vegetation Communities 2.1 Site Layout A new site layout was developed for 2017 which incorporates the Biometric methodology and previous BCC monitoring site layout. Site layout involved a 20m by 50m plot, with a nested 20m by 20m plot, and includes a 50m transect running through the plot, as shown in Figure 2.2. Monitoring methods undertaken within each plot and transect are outlined in Section 2.2. The plot/transect starts on the upper slope and runs directly down slope, this is a requirement for LFA monitoring. Permanent markers (such as star picket) were placed at either end of the 50m transect and at 20m to identify the plots. Figure 2.2 shows the general site layout. Figure 2.2. Site layout (DECCW 2011). 2.2 Biometric Vegetation Sampling The Biometric Vegetation Sampling method has been adopted to adequately compare the results of the monitoring program to a standard vegetation classification. The Biometric vegetation sampling method will allow a direct comparison of results to the NSW Government Vegetation Information System (VIS) database. The VIS database provides detailed information on hundreds of plant community types (PCT) throughout NSW and is updated and managed by the Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH). The Biometric vegetation sampling methodology was undertaken at each of the seven monitoring sites. The Biometric Vegetation Sampling methodology involved measuring the following components: Native plant species richness: total number of species recorded in a 20m x 20m plot. The plot was systematically traversed, and the number of indigenous vascular plant species were counted. All species were recorded to ensure the vegetation community is trending towards the target PCT; Native over-storey: percent foliage cover at 10 points along a 50m transect. Native over-storey is the tallest woody stratum present (including emergents) that is 1m and higher and includes all species native to
Recommended publications
  • Appendix D Terrestrial Ecology Report Part 2
    24 Bolivia Hill Community 6: Carex Fen PCT: 582 - Sedgeland fens wetland of impeded drainage of the Nandewar Bioregion and New England Tablelands Bioregion. Keith: Montane Bogs and Fens. TEC Type: Carex Sedgelands of the New England Tableland, Nandewar, Brigalow Belt South and NSW North Coast Bioregions - Endangered Ecological Community TSC Act http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/determinations/carexsedgelandFD.htm Montane peatlands and swamps of the New England Tableland, NSW North Coast, Sydney Basin, South East Corner, South Eastern Highlands and Australian Alps Bioregions - Endangered Ecological Community TSC Act. http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/determinations/MontanePeatlandsEndSpLi sting.htm Full floristic sample sites (4): BH122, BH127, BH140 & FEN53 (Hunter & Bell 2009). Rapid sample sites (3): BHR15, BHR16, BHR22. No. of taxa: 47 Area mapped: 6.9 ha Good: 0 ha Moderate: 5.3 ha Poor: 1.6 ha TEC: 6.9 ha Hewlett Hunter Pty Ltd (02) 6775 2452 25 Bolivia Hill Most common natives: listed in order of decreasing summed cover scores (fidelity x cover). Trees: none apparent. Shrubs: none apparent. Climbers & trailers: none apparent. Ground cover: Carex gaudichaudiana, Carex appressa, Glyceria australis, Carex sp. undetermined, Epilobium billardierianum, Stellaria angustifolia, Lythrum salicaria, Juncus usitatus, Haloragis heterophylla, Juncus vaginatus, Juncus prismatocarpus, Isachne globosa, Cyperus sphaeroideus, Carex fascicularis, Pratia purpurascens, Pennisetum alopecuroides, Lomandra multiflora, Juncus pauciflorus, Hypericum japonicum, Eleocharis gracilis, Baumea rubiginosa, Schoenoplectus validus, Ranunculus lappaceus, Oxalis perennans, Lomandra longifolia, Lachnagrostis filiformis. Introduced taxa: Paspalum dilatatum, Cirsium vulgare, Holcus lanatus, Medicago polymorpha, Hypochaeris radicata, Verbena bonariensis, Plantago lanceolata, Festuca elatior, Briza minor, Vicia sativa, Trifolium repens, Rubus anglocandicans, Prunella vulgaris, Lolium perenne, Bromus brevis, Anthoxanthum odoratum, Taraxacum officinale, Andropogon virginicus, Ammi majus.
    [Show full text]
  • Whitehorse Urban Biodiversity Strategy
    WHITEHORSE URBAN BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY For Council managed open space, streetscapes and community facilities Whitehorse Urban Biodiversity Strategy for Council Managed Open Space, Streetscapes and Community Facilities Contents Acknowledgements 4 9.1.11 Ground Level Habitat/Coarse Woody 24 Executive Summary 5 Material Fuel Reduction Guidelines Glossary Of Terms 6 9.1.12 Expand the Existing Infill Tree Planting 24 Program to Improve Canopy Cover 1 Introduction 6 9.1.13 Biodiversity Research Liaison 24 Committee 2 What Is Biodiversity 8 2.1 Defining “Whitehorse Biodiversity” 8 9.2 New Biodiversity Actions: One-Off 25 2.2 What are Public Whitehorse 8 Commitments Biodiversity Assets? 9.2.1 Development of An Inventory of 25 2.3 Water and Biodiversity 8 Whitehorse Biodiversity Assets 3 Statutory Context 13 10 9.2.2 List of “Biodiversity Hotspots” 25 3.1 Whitehorse City Council Policies 10 9.2.3 Development of A Biodiversity 26 and Strategies Corridors Plan 9.2.4 Identify Potential “No Mow” Areas 26 4 The Whitehorse Landscape and Biodiversity 10 9.2.5 Vegetation Management Plans For 26 4.1 Aboriginal History of Whitehorse 10 Large Tracts Of Land With 4.2 Natural Landscape of Whitehorse 10 Alternative Uses 4.3 The Remaining Natural Landscape 12 9.2.6 Biodiversity Engagement – Logos 26 of Whitehorse and Signage 4.4 The Suburban Whitehorse 14 9.2.7 Development Of Monitoring 27 Landscape Program 4.5 What Biodiversity is Missing 14 9.2.8 Community Reporting and Data 27 From Whitehorse Gathering 4.6 What Whitehorse Biodiversity Remains 15 9.2.9 Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Sequestering Soil Carbon in Irrigated Landscape Turned Dry Ecological Grazing
    Sequestering Soil Carbon in Irrigated Landscape Turned Dry Ecological Grazing Establishment of a Vegetation Monitoring Program Prepared for Kilter PTY LTD, December 2013 Project AOTGR1-167 Technical Report No.5 Greg Waddell & Karl Just Sequestering Soil Carbon in Irrigated Landscape Turned Dry Ecological Grazing Page 1 Page i CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 PROJECT CONTEXT .......................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 STUDY AREA .................................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................... 5 2.1 VEGETATION QUADRATS .................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 LIFEFORM CODES ............................................................................................................................ 6 2.3 PLANT TAXONOMY .......................................................................................................................... 6 2.4 SURVEY LIMITATIONS ....................................................................................................................... 6 3.0 RESULTS ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Generic Delimitation and Macroevolutionary Studies in Danthonioideae (Poaceae), with Emphasis on the Wallaby Grasses, Rytidosperma Steud
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2010 Generic delimitation and macroevolutionary studies in Danthonioideae (Poaceae), with emphasis on the wallaby grasses, Rytidosperma Steud. s.l. Humphreys, Aelys M Abstract: Ein Hauptziel von evolutionsbiologischer und ökologischer Forschung ist die biologische Vielfalt zu verstehen. Die systematische Biologie ist immer in der vordersten Reihe dieser Forschung gewesen and spielt eine wichtiger Rolle in der Dokumentation und Klassifikation von beobachteten Diversitätsmustern und in der Analyse von derer Herkunft. In den letzten Jahren ist die molekulare Phylogenetik ein wichtiger Teil dieser Studien geworden. Dies brachte nicht nur neue Methoden für phylogenetische Rekonstruktio- nen, die ein besseres Verständnis über Verwandtschaften und Klassifikationen brachten, sondern gaben auch einen neuen Rahmen für vergleichende Studien der Makroevolution vor. Diese Doktorarbeit liegt im Zentrum solcher Studien und ist ein Beitrag an unser wachsendes Verständnis der Vielfalt in der Natur und insbesondere von Gräsern (Poaceae). Gräser sind schwierig zu klassifizieren. Dies liegt ein- erseits an ihrer reduzierten Morphologie – die an Windbestäubung angepasst ist – und anderseits an Prozessen wie Hybridisation, die häufig in Gräsern vorkommen, und die die Bestimmung von evolution- shistorischen Mustern erschweren. Gräser kommen mit über 11,000 Arten auf allen Kontinenten (ausser der Antarktis) vor und umfassen einige der
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Landscape Surveillance for New Weed Threats Project: a Compilation of the Annual Reports on New Plant Naturalisations in South Australia 2010-2016
    State Herbarium of South Australia Botanic Gardens and State Herbarium Economic & Sustainable Development Group Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources Regional Landscape Surveillance for New Weed Threats Project: A compilation of the annual reports on new plant naturalisations in South Australia 2010-2016 Chris J. Brodie, Helen P. Vonow, Peter D. Canty, Peter J. Lang, Jürgen Kellermann & Michelle Waycott 2017 This document is a compilation of the Regional Landscape Surveillance reports by the State Herbarium of South Australia, covering the financial years 2009/10 to 2015/16. The reports are republished unchanged. The original page numbering has been retained. Each report should be cited as originally published. The correct citation is indicated on the back of the cover page of each report. This compilation should be cited as: Brodie, C.J.1, Vonow, H.P.1, Canty, P.D.1, Lang, P.J.1, Kellermann, J.1,2 & Waycott, M.1,2 (2017). Regional Landscape Surveillance for New Weed Threats Project: A compilation of the annual reports on new plant naturalisations in South Australia 2010-2016. (State Herbarium of South Australia: Adelaide). Authors’ addresses: 1 State Herbarium of South Australia, Botanic Gardens and State Herbarium, Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources (DEWNR), GPO Box 1047, Adelaide, SA 5001. 2 School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, SA 5005. ISBN 978-1-922027-51-1 (PDF) Published and available on Enviro Data SA data.environment.sa.gov.au With the exception of images and other material protected by a trademark and subject to review by the Government of South Australia at all times, the content of this publications is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Survey Summary Report
    Oakey Gen-tie Route Grid Connection Project Targeted Biodiversity Survey Summary Report Canadian Solar (Australia) Pty Ltd January 2017 0195672_09 www.erm.com The business of sustainability Approved by: Tom Cotter Oakey Gen-tie Route Grid Position: Project Manager Connection Project Signed: Targeted Biodiversity Survey Summary Report Date: 20 January, 2017 Canadian Solar (Australia) Pty Ltd Approved by: David Dique FINAL Position: Partner Signed: January 2017 Date: 20 January, 2017 www.erm.com Environmental Resources Management Australia Pty Ltd Quality System This disclaimer, together with any limitations specified in the report, apply to use of this report. This report was prepared in accordance with the contracted scope of services for the specific purpose stated and subject to the applicable cost, time and other constraints. In preparing this report, ERM relied on: (a) client/third party information which was not verified by ERM except to the extent required by the scope of services, and ERM does not accept responsibility for omissions or inaccuracies in the client/third party information; and (b) information taken at or under the particular times and conditions specified, and ERM does not accept responsibility for any subsequent changes. This report has been prepared solely for use by, and is confidential to, the client and ERM accepts no responsibility for its use by other persons. This report is subject to copyright protection and the copyright owner reserves its rights. This report does not constitute legal advice. CONTENTS 1
    [Show full text]
  • Racemobambos Ceramica S. Dransfield. Reinwardtia, 9(4): 386 (1980)
    Racemobambos celebica S. Dransfield. Kew Bull., 47(4): 707 (1992). Accepted by: W.D.Clayton & K.Harman, GrassBase (2008) and online, U.Quattrocchi, CRC World Dictionary of Grasses (2006). TYPE from Indonesia. T:<Type of Basionym>: fide TROPICOS and Kew Synonomy Database: IT: M.J.S. Sands 575 , 23 Nov 1969, Indonesia: Celbes I.: South Sulawesi: Enrekang Dist., Latimojong Mountains, slopes between Loco Melilin & Bunte Pinti, below Pinti Aloan, ca. 4 km SE of Bunte Djakke, 2,500 mt (L, US- 3327810). Illustrations (Books): No illustration found (BKS). Derivation (Clifford & Bostock 2007): L. -ica, belonging to. From Celebes, now Suluwasi, Indonesia. Classification . Subfamily Bambusoideae. Habit, Vegetative Morphology . Perennial, woody bamboo. Rhizomes elongated, pachymorph. Butt sheaths absent. Culms scandent, 3–6 mm diam., woody. Culm-internodes terete, thin-walled, 17 cm long. Culm- nodes brown, pubescent. Lateral branches dendroid. Branch complement many, in a clump, with 1 branch dominant, as thick as stem. Culm-sheaths present, without auricles. Leaves cauline. Leaf-sheaths glabrous on surface to pubescent. Leaf-sheath oral hairs setose, 6 mm long. Ligule a ciliolate membrane. Leaf-blade base with a brief petiole-like connection to sheath. Leaf-blades lanceolate, 3–13 cm long, 5 mm wide. Leaf-blade surface glabrous. Inflorescence . Inflorescence a panicle, comprising 3–9 fertile spikelets, bracteate at pedicel base. Panicle open, ovate, 3 cm long, bearing few spikelets. Panicle axis pubescent. Spikelets solitary. Fertile spikelets sessile and pedicelled. Fertile Spikelets . Spikelets comprising 3–6 fertile florets, with diminished florets at the apex. Spikelets of 2 or more fertile florets. Spikelets one-many-flowered - if two-flowered then both fertile or the upper sterile.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX E TERRESTRIAL FLORA ASSESSMENT HUNTER ECO July 2013
    APPENDIX E TERRESTRIAL FLORA ASSESSMENT HUNTER ECO July 2013 Wilpinjong Coal Mine Modification Terrestrial Flora Assessment By Hunter Eco July 2013 HUNTER ECO July 2013 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Scope of this Report 5 2 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT 7 2.1 Regional Location 7 2.2 Climate 7 2.3 Geology and Soils 7 2.4 Landform and Hydrology 9 2.5 Land Use 12 2.6 Vegetation 12 2.6.1 Vegetation Communities Mapped in the Modification Open Cut Extension Areas 12 2.7 Habitat Connectivity 12 3 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 15 3.1 Flora Species 15 3.2 Vegetation Communities 15 3.3 Threatened Flora Species 16 4 SUPPLEMENTARY FIELD SURVEY METHODS 21 4.1 Flora 21 4.1.1 Threatened Flora 21 4.2 Vegetation Communities 22 4.3 SEPP 44 Koala Habitat 23 5 SUPPLEMENTARY FIELD SURVEY RESULTS 24 5.1 Flora 24 5.1.1 Threatened Flora Species and Populations 24 HUNTER ECO July 2013 5.1.2 Vegetation Communities 25 5.1.3 Threatened Flora Populations 31 6 IMPACT EVALUATION 32 6.1 Potential Direct Impacts 32 6.1.1 Loss of Native Vegetation 32 6.1.2 Impacts on Habitat Connectivity 33 6.1.3 Changes to Hydrology 33 6.1.4 Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems 33 6.2 Potential Indirect Impacts 33 6.2.1 Introduced Flora 33 6.2.2 Hydrology 33 6.2.3 Dust 34 6.2.4 Phytophthora cinnamomi 34 6.3 Cumulative Impacts on Biodiversity 34 7 THREATENED SPECIES ASSESSMENT 36 7.1 Threatened Species 36 7.2 Endangered Populations 36 8 IMPACT ASSESSMENT 37 8.1 Threatened Flora Species 37 8.2 Threatened Ecological Communities 38 8.3 Conclusion 39 9 IMPACT AVOIDANCE, MITIGATION AND OFFSET
    [Show full text]
  • Newstead - Muckleford - Guildford 10 Km Radius Plant Census
    Newstead - Muckleford - Guildford 10 km radius plant census EPBC FFG VROTS Origin Scientific Name Common Name Family Name NumSite Acacia acinacea s.l. Gold-dust Wattle Mimosaceae 15 Acacia acinacea s.s. Gold-dust Wattle Mimosaceae 28 Acacia aculeatissima Thin-leaf Wattle Mimosaceae 1 Acacia aspera subsp. aspera Rough Wattle Mimosaceae 7 * Acacia baileyana Cootamundra Wattle Mimosaceae 14 Acacia dealbata Silver Wattle Mimosaceae 8 Acacia difformis Drooping Wattle Mimosaceae 1 # Acacia floribunda White Sallow-wattle Mimosaceae 1 Acacia genistifolia Spreading Wattle Mimosaceae 21 Acacia gunnii Ploughshare Wattle Mimosaceae 5 Acacia hakeoides Hakea Wattle Mimosaceae 1 Acacia implexa Lightwood Mimosaceae 2 Acacia melanoxylon Blackwood Mimosaceae 6 Acacia oxycedrus Spike Wattle Mimosaceae 1 Acacia paradoxa Hedge Wattle Mimosaceae 8 # Acacia provincialis Wirilda Mimosaceae 1 Acacia pycnantha Golden Wattle Mimosaceae 50 # Acacia retinodes s.l. Wirilda Mimosaceae 3 Acacia spp. Wattle Mimosaceae 1 r Acacia williamsonii Whirrakee Wattle Mimosaceae 1 Acaena echinata Sheep's Burr Rosaceae 25 Acaena novae-zelandiae Bidgee-widgee Rosaceae 3 Acaena ovina Australian Sheep's Burr Rosaceae 4 Acaena spp. Sheep's Burr Rosaceae 1 * Acetosella vulgaris Sheep Sorrel Polygonaceae 11 Acianthus caudatus Mayfly Orchid Orchidaceae 1 Acianthus exsertus s.l. Gnat Orchid Orchidaceae 1 Acianthus pusillus Small Mosquito-orchid Orchidaceae 1 Acrotriche serrulata Honey-pots Ericaceae 27 Actinobole uliginosum Flannel Cudweed Asteraceae 1 Adiantum aethiopicum Common Maidenhair Adiantaceae 1 * Agave americana Century Plant Agavaceae 1 * Agrostis capillaris Brown-top Bent Poaceae 7 * Agrostis stolonifera Creeping Bent Poaceae 5 * Aira caryophyllea subsp. caryophyllea Silvery Hair-grass Poaceae 3 * Aira cupaniana Quicksilver Grass Poaceae 14 * Aira elegantissima Delicate Hair-grass Poaceae 13 * Aira spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Assessment
    Appendix D Biodiversity Assessment MOUNT PLEASANT OPERATION – MINE OPTIMISATION MODIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT BIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENT PREPARED BY HUNTER ECO MAY 2017 HUNTER ECO . ABN 25 112 984 240 PO Box 1047, Toronto, NSW 2283 Phone/Fax +61 2 4959 8016 Mobile 0438 773 029 Email [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREAS 1 2.1. South Western Out of Pit Emplacement 1 2.2. Eastern Out of Pit Emplacement 1 3. METHOD 3 3.1. Vegetation Communities 3 3.2. Flora 3 3.3. Fauna 3 4. RESULTS 4 4.1. Vegetation Communities 4 4.2. Flora 4 4.3. Fauna 4 5. REFERENCES 11 ATTACHMENT 1 12 KNOWN OR PREDICTED THREATENED SPECIES, COMMUNITIES AND POPULATIONS 12 ATTACHMENT 2 19 EASTERN OUT OF PIT EMPLACEMENT AREA FLORISTIC LIST 19 ATTACHMENT 3 21 SOUTH WESTERN OUT OF PIT EMPLACEMENT AREA FLORISTIC LIST 21 ATTACHMENT 4 24 FLORISTIC PLOT DATA 24 ATTACHMENT 5 31 TARGETED SURVEYS FOR DIURIS TRICOLOR AND PRASOPHYLLUM PETILUM 31 i HUNTER ECO . ABN 25 112 984 240 PO Box 1047, Toronto, NSW 2283 Phone/Fax +61 2 4959 8016 Mobile 0438 773 029 Email [email protected] FIGURES Figure 1 Subject Emplacement Areas in a Local Context 2 Figure 2 Vegetation Communities Mapped Across the Eastern Out of Pit Emplacement, Paddock Trees and Floristic Plots 5 Figure 3 Vegetation Communities Mapped Across the South Western Out of Pit Emplacement Area, Paddock Trees and Floristic Plots 6 TABLES Table 1 Vegetation Communities Mapped Across the South Western Out of Pit Emplacement Area 7 Table 2 Vegetation Communities Mapped Across the Eastern Out of Pit Emplacement 8 Table 3 Species Attribute Comparison Between Eastern and South Western Out of Pit Emplacement Areas 9 Table 4 Comparison of Native Vegetation Communities 10 ii HUNTER ECO .
    [Show full text]
  • GBMWHA Native Flora Species Bionet + Plantnet - May 2016 NSW Comm
    BM nature GBMWHA Native Flora Species BioNet + PlantNet - May 2016 NSW Comm. No. Family Scientific Name Common Name status status 1 Acanthaceae Brunoniella australis Blue Trumpet 2 Acanthaceae Brunoniella pumilio Dwarf Blue Trumpet 3 Acanthaceae Pseuderanthemum variabile Pastel Flower 4 Acanthaceae Rostellularia adscendens 5 Adiantaceae Adiantum aethiopicum Common Maidenhair P 6 Adiantaceae Adiantum atroviride P 7 Adiantaceae Adiantum diaphanum Filmy Maidenhair P 8 Adiantaceae Adiantum formosum Giant Maidenhair P 9 Adiantaceae Adiantum hispidulum Rough Maidenhair P 10 Adiantaceae Adiantum silvaticum P 11 Adiantaceae Pellaea calidirupium 12 Adiantaceae Pellaea falcata Sickle Fern 13 Adiantaceae Pellaea nana Dwarf Sickle Fern 14 Adiantaceae Pellaea paradoxa 15 Adoxaceae Sambucus australasica Native Elderberry 16 Adoxaceae Sambucus gaudichaudiana White Elderberry 17 Aizoaceae Tetragonia tetragonioides New Zealand Spinach 18 Alismataceae Alisma plantago-aquatica Water Plantain 19 Amaranthaceae Alternanthera denticulata Lesser Joyweed 20 Amaranthaceae Deeringia amaranthoides 21 Amaranthaceae Nyssanthes diffusa Barbwire Weed 22 Amaranthaceae Nyssanthes erecta 23 Amaranthaceae Ptilotus macrocephalus Green Pussytails 24 Amygdalaceae Prunus cerasifera 25 Anthericaceae Alania endlicheri 26 Anthericaceae Arthropodium milleflorum Pale Vanilla-lily 27 Anthericaceae Arthropodium minus Small Vanilla Lily 28 Anthericaceae Caesia parviflora Pale Grass-lily 29 Anthericaceae Dichopogon fimbriatus Nodding Chocolate Lily 30 Anthericaceae Dichopogon strictus
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Inventory Report: Western Grassland Reserve - One Tree East Melbourne Strategic Assessment
    Vegetation Inventory Report: Western Grassland Reserve - One Tree East Melbourne Strategic Assessment © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2015 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo and the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en ISBN 978-1-74146-792-5 (pdf) Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an alternative format, please telephone the DELWP Customer Service Centre on 136186, email [email protected], or via the National Relay Service on 133 677 www.relayservice.com.au. This document is also available on the internet at www.delwp.vic.gov.au Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Contents Terms and abbreviations 2 Introduction 3 Purpose and scope 3 The survey area 4 Previous survey information 4 Survey Methods 6 Coverage and intensity 6 Definitions 6 Survey Results 8 EPBC-listed ‘Matters of National Environmental Significance’ 8 FFG-listed values 11 Native vegetation according to Ecological Vegetation Classes 11 Vegetation patterns - Natural Temperate Grassland ‘states’ 13 Plant species 15 Hot Spots 18 References 20 Appendix 1: Comparison of previous and recent mapping at Upper Lollipop Wetland.
    [Show full text]