MAKE IT SAFE Canada’S Obligation to End the First Nations Water Crisis WATCH

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MAKE IT SAFE Canada’S Obligation to End the First Nations Water Crisis WATCH HUMAN RIGHTS MAKE IT SAFE Canada’s Obligation to End the First Nations Water Crisis WATCH Make it Safe Canada’s Obligation to End the First Nations Water Crisis Copyright © 2016 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-33634 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org JUNE 2016 ISBN: 978-1-6231-33634 Make it Safe Canada’s Obligation to End the First Nations Water Crisis Summary and Recommendations ........................................................................................ 1 Methodology .................................................................................................................... 23 First Nations in the Report ................................................................................................ 25 Batchewana First Nation ......................................................................................................... 25 Grassy Narrows (Asubpeeschoseewagunk) First Nation .......................................................... 26 Neskantaga First Nation ......................................................................................................... 26 Shoal Lake 40 First Nation ..................................................................................................... 26 Six Nations of the Grand River ................................................................................................. 27 I. Water and Sanitation Conditions on First Nations Reserves ............................................ 28 Water Advisories on Ontario’s First Nations Reserves ............................................................. 29 Past Government Responses to Water and Sanitation Problems .............................................. 35 II. Impact of Poor Water and Sanitation Conditions ........................................................... 40 Impacts on Health and Hygiene ............................................................................................. 40 Impacts on At-Risk Populations .............................................................................................. 45 Impacts on Caregivers ............................................................................................................ 47 Impacts on Lower-Income Families ........................................................................................ 49 Impact on Cultural Life ............................................................................................................ 50 Impact on Housing ................................................................................................................. 52 III. Barriers to Safe Drinking Water and Sanitation on First Nations Reserves .................... 55 Absence of a Regulatory Framework ........................................................................................ 56 Funds for Water and Wastewater Systems ............................................................................... 65 Backlog of First Nations Seeking Capital Investment ............................................................... 72 Private Household Wells, Cisterns, and Septic Systems ........................................................... 74 Source Water Problems ........................................................................................................... 77 IV. International Legal Obligations ................................................................................... 82 Right to Water ......................................................................................................................... 83 Right to Sanitation ................................................................................................................. 84 Right to Health........................................................................................................................ 85 Right to Housing .................................................................................................................... 86 Right to Information ............................................................................................................... 86 Right to Nondiscrimination ..................................................................................................... 87 Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................ 88 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Youths walk along the road in Neskantaga First Nation, a remote community in Northern Ontario which has been on a boil water advisory since 1995. © 2015 Samer Muscati/Human Rights Watch 2 MAKE IT SAFE Canada, one of the wealthiest countries in the world, is also one of the most water-rich. The province of Ontario shares the Great Lakes—which contain 18 percent of the world’s fresh surface water—with the United States. Access to sufficient, affordable, and safe drinking water and adequate sanitation is easy for most Canadians. But this is not true for many First Nations indigenous persons. In stark contrast, the water supplied to many First Nations communities on lands known as reserves is contaminated, hard to access, or at risk due to faulty treatment systems. The government regulates water quality for off-reserve communities, but has no binding regulations for water on First Nations reserves. HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | JUNE 2016 3 rinking water advisories alert communi- ties when their water is not safe to drink. In Canada, these advisories are highly concen- trated in First Nations communities. They Dexist for 134 water systems—90 of them in Ontario Prov- ince—in 85 First Nations reserves across Canada, as of January 2016. Many of these drinking water advisories for reserves persist for years, sometimes for decades. They are indicative of the broader systemic crisis that leaves many First Nations persons facing daily challenges just to access safe water for drinking and hygiene—a funda- mental human right easily enjoyed by most Canadians. On March 22, 2016, auspiciously World Water Day, new Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced his govern- ment’s budget, with significant funds to address failing infrastructure in First Nations communities. With nearly CAD$4.6 billion to be invested in infrastructure in indig- enous communities over the next five years, including for water and wastewater systems, this is a promising announcement. Financial commitment alone, however, will not solve the water and wastewater crisis on First Nations reserves. Along with infrastructure investments, the government should remedy a range of problems that contribute to the water crisis. These include: the lack of binding regu- lations on water quality on First Nations reserves; per- sistent under-funding and arbitrary budgeting for water system costs, including capital, operation, and mainte- nance costs; lack of support for household water and wastewater systems; worsening conditions of source wa- ter; and lack of capacity and support for water operators. Human Rights Watch conducted research in First Nations communities in the province of Ontario between July 2015 and April 2016 to understand the human impacts of this crisis, and to understand why the problem persists. We conducted a water and sanitation survey with 99 house- holds, home to 352 people, in Batchewana, Grassy Nar- rows, Shoal Lake 40, Neskantaga, and Six Nations of the Grand River First Nations. Human Rights Watch conducted an additional 111 qualitative interviews with chiefs and council members in these and other First Nations com- munities, residents, water operators, educators, envi- ronment and health experts, academics, and staff of 4 MAKE IT SAFE Walter Sakanee, an elder living in Neskantaga First Nation, has had difficulty fighting infections in his legs. He relies on his family members to collect safe drinking water for him in blue plastic jugs from a reverse osmosis machine located at the community’s water treatment plant. He is not able to access the plant on his own due to his physical disability. © 2015 Samer Muscati/Human Rights Watch HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | JUNE 2016 5 Roxanne Moonias, mother to an infant with a chronic illness, demonstrates one of the steps she takes to ensure her baby is not exposed to contaminants in the water. Roxanne lives in Neskantaga First Nation and says that it takes her an hour each time to properly wash and rinse his bottles. © 2015 Samer Muscati/Human Rights Watch 6 MAKE IT SAFE Installed in 2009, a reverse osmosis machine is the only source of clean drinking water in Neskantaga First Nation. According to government reports, the machine breaks down at least a few times a year and bottled water must be flown in for about CAD$15,000 a month. Beverages for sale in Neskantaga First Nation. Safe drinking water in
Recommended publications
  • Assessing the Influence of First Nation Education Counsellors on First Nation Post-Secondary Students and Their Program Choices
    Assessing the Influence of First Nation Education Counsellors on First Nation Post-Secondary Students and their Program Choices by Pamela Williamson A dissertation submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Higher Education Graduate Department of Theory and Policy Studies in Education Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto © Copyright by Pamela Williamson (2011) Assessing the Influence of First Nation Education Counsellors on First Nation Post-Secondary Students and their Post-Secondary Program Choices Doctor of Higher Education 2011 Pamela Williamson Department of Theory and Policy Studies in Education University of Toronto Abstract The exploratory study focused on First Nation students and First Nation education counsellors within Ontario. Using an interpretative approach, the research sought to determine the relevance of the counsellors as a potentially influencing factor in the students‘ post-secondary program choices. The ability of First Nation education counsellors to be influential is a consequence of their role since they administer Post- Secondary Student Support Program (PSSSP) funding. A report evaluating the program completed by Indian and Northern Affairs Canada in 2005 found that many First Nation students would not have been able to achieve post-secondary educational levels without PSSSP support. Eight self-selected First Nation Education counsellors and twenty-nine First Nation post- secondary students participated in paper surveys, and five students and one counsellor agreed to complete a follow-up interview. The quantitative and qualitative results revealed differences in the perceptions of the two survey groups as to whether First Nation education counsellors influenced students‘ post-secondary program choices.
    [Show full text]
  • TOXIC WATER: the KASHECHEWAN STORY Introduction It Was the Straw That Broke the Prover- Had Been Under a Boil-Water Alert on and Focus Bial Camel’S Back
    TOXIC WATER: THE KASHECHEWAN STORY Introduction It was the straw that broke the prover- had been under a boil-water alert on and Focus bial camel’s back. A fax arrived from off for years. In fall 2005, Canadi- Health Canada (www.hc-sc.gc.ca) at the A week after the water tested positive ans were stunned to hear of the Kashechewan First Nations council for E. coli, Indian Affairs Minister appalling living office, revealing that E. coli had been Andy Scott arrived in Kashechewan. He conditions on the detected in the reserve’s drinking water. offered to provide the people with more Kashechewan First Enough was enough. A community bottled water but little else. Incensed by Nations Reserve in already plagued by poverty and unem- Scott’s apparent indifference, the Northern Ontario. ployment was now being poisoned by community redoubled their efforts, Initial reports documented the its own water supply. Something putting pressure on the provincial and presence of E. coli needed to be done, and some members federal governments to evacuate those in the reserve’s of the reserve had a plan. First they who were suffering from the effects of drinking water. closed down the schools. Next, they the contaminated water. The Ontario This was followed called a meeting of concerned members government pointed the finger at Ot- by news of poverty and despair, a of the community. Then they launched tawa because the federal government is reflection of a a media campaign that shifted the responsible for Canada’s First Nations. standard of living national spotlight onto the horrendous Ottawa pointed the finger back at the that many thought conditions in this remote, Northern province, saying that water safety and unimaginable in Ontario reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Life Safety Risks to the Kashechewan First Nation Community Canadian Consulting Engineering Awards
    Reducing Life Safety Risks to the Kashechewan First Nation Community Canadian Consulting Engineering Awards • • • • • • Figure 1: Dam Safety Risk Assessment Tool Figure 2: Flood Forecast Tool De : Lamirande-Gauvin, Gabrielle A : Ducharme, Sophie Objet : FW: Canadian Consulting Engineer Awards - your entry Date : Friday, April 20, 2018 2:25:39 PM FYI Gabrielle Lamirande-Gauvin Global Marketing Manager, Energy Marketing Lead, Eastern North America From: Canadian Consulting Engineer [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: April 20, 2018 2:24 PM To: Lamirande-Gauvin, Gabrielle <[email protected]> Subject: Canadian Consulting Engineer Awards - your entry DO NOT REPLY Project Information Project Name Reducing Life Safety Risks to the Kashechewan First Nation Community Location of Project Not applicable Kashechewan First Nation, Ontario Canada Map It Completed by 2017 To be entered in Category C. Water Resources Entering Firms Firm Name(s) Hatch/FHR Inc. Firm Address 2800 Speakman Drive Mississauga, Ontario L5K 2R7 Canada Map It Role in the Project Research and Studies to quantify the flooding risks associated with an ageing dam to a remote First Nations Community and develop solutions to reduce these risks. Member of the Association of Consulting Engineering Companies of Canada (ACEC)? Yes Contact #1 (Communications/Marketing/Public Relations) Gabrielle Lamirande-Gauvin Phone for Contact #1 (514) 864-5500 Email for Contact #1 [email protected] Contact #2 (Management/Administration) Gabrielle Lamirande-Gauvin Phone for Contact #2 (514) 864-5500 Email for Contact #2 [email protected] Contact #3 (Project Engineer) C. Richard Donnelly Phone for Contact #3 (905) 357-6970 Email for Contact #3 [email protected] P.Eng? Yes Project Outline Project Summary The Kashechewan Ring Dyke protects over 2000 residents of a remote community from flooding that occurs during spring break up.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Profiles for the Oneca Education And
    FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 Political/Territorial Facts About This Community Phone Number First Nation and Address Nation and Region Organization or and Fax Number Affiliation (if any) • Census data from 2006 states Aamjiwnaang First that there are 706 residents. Nation • This is a Chippewa (Ojibwe) community located on the (Sarnia) (519) 336‐8410 Anishinabek Nation shores of the St. Clair River near SFNS Sarnia, Ontario. 978 Tashmoo Avenue (Fax) 336‐0382 • There are 253 private dwellings in this community. SARNIA, Ontario (Southwest Region) • The land base is 12.57 square kilometres. N7T 7H5 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 506 residents. Alderville First Nation • This community is located in South‐Central Ontario. It is 11696 Second Line (905) 352‐2011 Anishinabek Nation intersected by County Road 45, and is located on the south side P.O. Box 46 (Fax) 352‐3242 Ogemawahj of Rice Lake and is 30km north of Cobourg. ROSENEATH, Ontario (Southeast Region) • There are 237 private dwellings in this community. K0K 2X0 • The land base is 12.52 square kilometres. COPYRIGHT OF THE ONECA EDUCATION PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM 1 FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 406 residents. • This Algonquin community Algonquins of called Pikwàkanagàn is situated Pikwakanagan First on the beautiful shores of the Nation (613) 625‐2800 Bonnechere River and Golden Anishinabek Nation Lake. It is located off of Highway P.O. Box 100 (Fax) 625‐1149 N/A 60 and is 1 1/2 hours west of Ottawa and 1 1/2 hours south of GOLDEN LAKE, Ontario Algonquin Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Terms of Reference Sections 10-11
    DRAFT Marten Falls First Nation Draft Terms of Reference Marten Falls Community Access Road – Environmental Assessment Prepared by: AECOM Canada Ltd. 105 Commerce Valley Drive West, 7th Floor Markham, ON L3T 7W3 Canada SECTIONS: 10 AND 11 T: 905.886.7022 F: 905.886.9494 www.aecom.com Date: November, 2019 Project #: 60593122 AECOM Marten Falls First Nation Draft Terms of Reference Marten Falls Community Access Road – Environmental Assessment 10. Consultation During the ToR The following describes the results of the public and Indigenous community consultation program that has been undertaken up to October 11, 2019. The ToR consultation activities are continuing through fall 2019 to spring 2020, including the release of this Draft ToR. The results of these ongoing consultation activities will be documented in the Final or “Proposed” ToR that will be submitted to MECP for an approval decision. These ongoing ToR consultation activities and inputs will also feed into the development of the EA Consultation program that is outlined in draft in Section 11. 10.1 Principles of Consultation A primary objective of the EA process, including the ToR development, is to effectively communicate information about the proposed CAR, and to consult with those who may be potentially affected by or have an interest in it. MFFN is committed to creating and sustaining constructive dialogue and relationships with interested persons including MFFN community membership, neighbouring Indigenous communities, government agencies, the public, industry, non-government organizations, and local and regional stakeholders, to support the environmental, social and economic sustainability of the proposed CAR. To honour the traditional lands that the CAR is proposed to be developed on and to respect MFFN traditional teachings5, the Guiding Principles presented in Figure 10-1 will be followed throughout all Project-related consultation activities and the full EA process; from preparation of the ToR to preparation of the EA and implementation of the CAR.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Accounts of the Province of Ontario for the Year Ended March
    PUBLIC ACCOUNTS, 1994-95 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS Hon. Elmer Buchanan, Minister DETAILS OF EXPENDITURE Voted Salaries and Wages ($87,902,805) Temporary Help Services ($1,329,292): Management Board Secretariat, 1,220,010; Accounts under $50,000—109,282. Less: Recoveries from Other Ministries ($196,635): Environment and Energy, 196,635. Employee Benefits ($13,866,524) Payments for Canada Pension Plan, 1 ,594,486; Dental Plan, 95 1 ,332; Employer Health Tax, 1 ,702,083; Group Life Insurance, 170,970; Long Term Income Protection, 1,028,176; Supplementary Health and Hospital Plan, 1,016,690; Unemployment Insurance, 3,017,224; Unfunded Liability— Public Service Pension Fund, 1,024,574. Other Benefits: Attendance Gratuities, 401,716; Death Benefits, 18,660; Early Retirement Incentive, 467,244; Maternity/Parental/Adoption Leave Allowances, 530,045; Severance Pay, 1,494,057; Miscellaneous Benefits, 51,035. Workers' Compensation Board, 315,097. Payments to Other Ministries ($152,141): Accounts under $50,000—152,141. Less: Recoveries from Other Ministries ($69,006): Accounts under $50,000—69,006. Travelling Expenses ($3,859,979) Hon. Elmer Buchanan, 7,002; P. Klopp, 3,765; R. Burak, 9,912; W.R. Allen, 13,155; D.K. Alles, 16,276; P.M. Angus, 23,969; D. Beattie, 12,681; A. Bierworth, 14,510; J.L. Cushing, 12,125; L.L. Davies, 11,521; P. Dick, 16,999; E.J. Dickson, 11,231; R.C. Donais, 10,703; J.R. Drynan, 10,277; R. Dunlop, 10,662; JJ. Gardner, 43,319; C.L. Goubau, 12,096; N. Harris, 12,593; F.R Hayward, 26,910; M.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Headed to the Supreme Court of Canada Will Tackle Native Jury Roll Complaints | Toronto Star
    9/10/2015 Case headed to the Supreme Court of Canada will tackle native jury roll complaints | Toronto Star CANADA Search thestar.com HOME News / Canada NEWS Case headed to the Supreme Court of Canada GTA Queen's Park will tackle native jury roll complaints Canada Lawyers and advocates hope case settles a long­standing problem of aboriginal World underrepresentation in the nation’s jury system Investigations Competitive fixed and Crime Tweet 22 0 variable mortgage rates YOUR TORONTO OPINION Learn more > SPORTS BUSINESS Latest National Videos Watch more ENTERTAINMENT LIFE Deeaann B Brordoyd oyn o fnin fdiindg icnogu cnotruy nstpriryit s ipn iEraits tienrn Canada Eastern Canada AUTOS PHOTOS DIVERSIONS ‹ › CLASSIFIEDS OBITUARIES •••••••••• Inside the Star Top News TORONTO STAR / DONOVAN VINCENT Updated $1.9B lawsuit calls for end to child Toronto lawyer Delmar Doucette has a case before the Supreme Court of Canada that claims support claw­back Ontario is failing to ensure representative numbers of aboriginals on jury rolls. Drew Hutchison, Blue Jays rocked by Red Sox in Boston $1.9B lawsuit calls for end to claw­back of By: Donovan Vincent News reporter, Published on Tue Jul 01 2014 Updated Ontario dramatically cuts funding for child support TAVIS police unit Lawyers and advocates for aboriginal groups are hoping a looming Supreme Court of Canada case will once and for all settle the problem of native underrepresentation on Harper’s campaign manager called off the trail, CBC says jury rolls, particularly in cases where the accused is a First Nations person. Republican candidate Carly Fiorina hits back after Donald Trump mockery Video The case involves Clifford Kokopenace, who on June 17, 2008, in Kenora, was convicted by a jury of manslaughter in the death of a friend on the Grassy Narrows reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 2 Connecting 17 Remote First Nation Communities NOTICE of COMPLETION and OPPORTUNITY to INSPECT the FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL S
    Phase 2 Connecting 17 Remote First Nation Communities NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND OPPORTUNITY TO INSPECT THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY REPORT The Project: Wataynikaneyap Power L.P. is a licensed transmission company majority owned by First Nations. The First Nations ownership interest is equally owned by 22 First Nation communities, and a minority interest in the partnership is owned by Fortis Inc. The Wataynikaneyap Transmission Project Phase 2 (the Project) includes approximately 1,500 km of 115 kV, 44 kV and 25 kV transmission lines and associated facilities for subsystems north of Pickle Lake and Red Lake that will connect 17 remote First Nation communities, currently powered by diesel generation, to the provincial electrical grid. Figure 1 (see reverse) identifies the Project location and transmission and alternative corridors. The Project has been identified as one of the priority projects in Ontario’s Long‐Term Energy Plan, and Wataynikaneyap has been selected as the designated transmitter to connect communities. Wataynikaneyap’s principal purpose is to provide safe, accessible and clean electrical power to remote First Nation communities and to decrease the reliance on diesel‐powered energy generation which, consequently, will provide environmental, economic, social, quality‐of‐life and health benefits. Environmental Assessment (EA) Process: The Project is subject to the Ontario Environmental Assessment Act and to Section 67 of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 for the portions of the transmission line on First Nation reserve lands. The Final Environmental Study Report (ESR) has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the following Class EA processes: Class Environmental Assessment for Minor Transmission Facilities (Ontario Hydro, 1992) (for applicable 115 kV sections and associated infrastructure).
    [Show full text]
  • Media Release
    MEDIA RELEASE A WIN FOR MATAWA FIRST NATIONS CANADA AND CLIFFS LOSE DECISION ON MOTIONS IN LEGAL PROCEEDING Chiefs Reiterate Their Demand For An Immediate Halt to the Current Environmental Assessment Process THUNDER BAY, ON. MARCH 19, 2013. ‐ Matawa First Nations Chiefs welcome the decision by Madam Prothonotary Aronovitch of the Federal Court to deny motions filed by Canada and Cliffs in the Judicial Review (JR) proceeding that is examining the Environmental Assessment (EA) process in the Ring of Fire. The First Nations launched a legal challenge to the federal EA process for the Cliffs Chromite Project in early November 2011. Cliffs and Canada brought motions challenging some of the evidence of the First Nations in the case. On Friday March 15, 2013, Cliffs and Canada lost their motions on all counts. The Federal Court found that these motions caused "unnecessarily delay" in the proceeding. The court awarded costs to the First Nations, and set the case on an expedited schedule towards a hearing. “Cliffs needs to halt the current EA process and negotiate an appropriate process with our First Nations. We believe the Court will agree with us on that too.” said Chief Roger Wesley of Constance Lake First Nation. “What we have now is a paper-based EA process, run completely outside of the communities affected, with no meaningful involvement of First Nations, and is non-transparent. It needs to be made accessible, by holding hearings in the First Nations and using an independent panel. The First Nations have made it very clear that they are willing to negotiate the parameters for an effective EA process,” said Chief Sonny Gagnon of Aroland First Nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicine Wheel Teachings
    Five Community Water Tales The Tale of Yellow Quill Two Stories Converge The Story of the Establishment of Safe Drinking Water Foundation: Safe Drinking Water Foundation (SDWF) was formed in 1997 by five international scientists (from Russia, Scotland, Japan, and Canada). SDWF became a registered Canadian charity in 1998. Meanwhile, in Yellow Quill, Saskatchewan, the community was under a boil water advisory since 1995. In the spring of 1999, Carla Plotnikoff, an environmental health officer working for the Saskatoon Tribal Council, tracked down Dr. Hans Peterson (one of the founders of SDWF and the Volunteer Executive Director) because she wanted to tell him about the plight of Yellow Quill First Nation. She said, “Yellow Quill is a community some two and a half hours northeast of Saskatoon and I fear for the health of its community members because the tap water is so bad.” The Situation in Yellow Quill Ms. Plotnikoff then went on to describe conditions that Dr. Peterson had only associated with developing countries. He was skeptical – he had toured rural China and Thailand looking for drinking water issues that needed correcting. But Canada? He knew nothing about First Nations communities or issues. But, Canada is a developed country, so how bad could it be? Visiting Yellow Quill Ms. Plotnikoff and Dr. Peterson drove to Yellow Quill on June 19, 1999. Little did Dr. Peterson know at the time that his life was about to change drastically. They talked to the three band councillors who demanded an end to the, by then, four-year boil water advisory. Then, they followed the water treatment plant operator, Robert Neapetung, and engineering company representatives to the water treatment plant.
    [Show full text]
  • TERMS of REFERENCE Webequie First Nation
    Webequie Supply Road Environmental Assessment TERMS OF REFERENCE Webequie First Nation Prepared by: Prepared for: Submitted to: SNC-Lavalin Inc. Webequie First Nation Ministry of the Environment, 195 The West Mall Conservation and Parks Toronto, Ontario, M9C 5K1 www.snclavalin.com August 2020 661910 WSR240-SNC-PR-RT-0002 SNC-Submission ToR for Review-2020-08-12 Webequie Supply Road Environmental Assessment Terms of Reference Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ..................................................................... vii 1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 1 1.1 Proponent ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Proponent Contact Information ...................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Project Background and Context ................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Purpose and Rationale for the Undertaking and Study ................................................................. 6 1.4.1 Purpose of the Undertaking ................................................................................................... 6 1.4.2 Rationale for the Undertaking ................................................................................................ 7 1.5 Outline of Terms of Reference (ToR) ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Ontario Foresight Papers 2019
    RURALONTARIO FORESIGHT PAPERS 2019 MONTHLY REPORT Rural Ontario Foresight Papers 2019 CONTENTS Foreword ______________________________________________________________________________ 1 Authors ________________________________________________________________________________ 2 Access to Quality Medical and Health Services: Examples from Northern Ontario __ 7 Northern Perspective ___________________________________________________________ 23 New Approaches to First Nation Infrastructure Development – The Nipissing First Nation Experience ___________________________________________________________________ 27 Northern Perspective ____________________________________________________________ 41 Energy Use and the Rural Homeowner _____________________________________________ 47 Northern Perspective ____________________________________________________________ 56 Services for an Aging Rural Population _____________________________________________ 61 Northern Perspective ___________________________________________________________ 80 Water, Water Everywhere – When the Storm Water Flows _________________________ 87 Northern Perspective ____________________________________________________________ 98 Workforce Development in Rural Ontario – A snapshot ___________________________ 101 Northern Perspective _______________________________________________________________ 123 Foreword The 2019 Rural Ontario Foresight Papers is a collection of six discussion papers on selected themes as prepared by expert authors. Each has a corresponding Northern Commentary
    [Show full text]