TERMS of REFERENCE Webequie First Nation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TERMS of REFERENCE Webequie First Nation Webequie Supply Road Environmental Assessment TERMS OF REFERENCE Webequie First Nation Prepared by: Prepared for: Submitted to: SNC-Lavalin Inc. Webequie First Nation Ministry of the Environment, 195 The West Mall Conservation and Parks Toronto, Ontario, M9C 5K1 www.snclavalin.com August 2020 661910 WSR240-SNC-PR-RT-0002 SNC-Submission ToR for Review-2020-08-12 Webequie Supply Road Environmental Assessment Terms of Reference Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ..................................................................... vii 1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 1 1.1 Proponent ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Proponent Contact Information ...................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Project Background and Context ................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Purpose and Rationale for the Undertaking and Study ................................................................. 6 1.4.1 Purpose of the Undertaking ................................................................................................... 6 1.4.2 Rationale for the Undertaking ................................................................................................ 7 1.5 Outline of Terms of Reference (ToR) ............................................................................................ 9 2 Regulatory Framework for the Project .............................................. 11 2.1 Regulatory Framework ................................................................................................................ 11 2.1.1 Ontario Environmental Assessment Act .............................................................................. 11 2.1.2 Canada Impact Assessment Act .......................................................................................... 12 2.1.3 Process for Federal-Provincial Coordinated EA .................................................................. 13 2.1.4 Other Relevant Federal Legislation and Permits ................................................................. 14 2.1.5 Other Relevant Provincial Legislation and Permits .............................................................. 15 3 Approach for Preparation of the Environmental Assessment ........... 19 3.1 Environmental Assessment Principles ........................................................................................ 19 3.2 Indication of How the Environmental Assessment is to be Prepared .......................................... 19 4 Description of the Undertaking ......................................................... 23 4.1 Design Considerations and Criteria ............................................................................................. 25 4.1.1 Preliminary Design Criteria .................................................................................................. 25 4.2 Components and Activities of the Project .................................................................................... 26 4.3 Project Phases ............................................................................................................................. 27 4.3.1 Construction Phase .............................................................................................................. 27 4.3.2 Operations Phase ................................................................................................................ 28 4.3.3 Decommissioning Phase ..................................................................................................... 29 4.3.4 Project Phasing Schedule .................................................................................................... 29 661910 August 2020 i . Webequie Supply Road Environmental Assessment Terms of Reference 5 Description of and Rationale for Alternatives ................................... 31 5.1 Range of Alternatives Considered ............................................................................................... 31 5.1.1 Alternatives to the Undertaking ............................................................................................ 31 5.1.1.1 Alternative 1: Do Nothing – Null Alternative ................................................................. 33 5.1.1.2 Alternative 2: Upgrade Existing Trail System to Seasonal Winter Road ..................... 33 5.1.1.3 Alternative 3: Alternative Modes of Transportation ...................................................... 34 5.1.1.4 Alternative 4: Manage Transportation Demand ........................................................... 38 5.1.1.5 Alternative 5: New All-Season Road ............................................................................ 38 5.1.1.6 Preferred Planning Alternative ..................................................................................... 38 5.1.2 Alternative Methods of Carrying Out the Undertaking ......................................................... 40 5.1.2.1 Background and Context .............................................................................................. 40 5.1.2.2 Alternative Supply Road Corridors ............................................................................... 43 5.1.2.3 Initial Identification of Webequie Supply Road Corridor Alternative Concepts ............ 44 5.2 Initial Screening of Webequie Supply Road Corridor Alternative Concepts ................................ 53 5.3 Rationale for the Preferred Corridor Alternative .......................................................................... 66 5.4 Development of Routing Sub-Alternatives within Preferred Supply Road Corridor .................... 66 5.4.1 Initial Geotechnical Assessment - Terrain Mapping ............................................................ 66 5.4.1.1 Routing Considerations ................................................................................................ 67 5.4.1.2 Alternative Routes ........................................................................................................ 67 5.4.1.3 Optimal Geotechnical Route ........................................................................................ 69 5.5 Project Infrastructure Alternatives ............................................................................................... 71 5.5.1 Construction Camps ............................................................................................................ 71 5.5.2 Aggregate Source Locations and Access Roads ................................................................ 73 5.6 Alternative Methods Carried Forward for Environmental Assessment ........................................ 73 5.6.1 Webequie Supply Road Alternatives ................................................................................... 73 5.6.2 Project Infrastructure Alternatives ........................................................................................ 74 6 Existing Environmental Conditions ................................................... 76 6.1 General Environmental Setting .................................................................................................... 76 6.2 Natural Environment .................................................................................................................... 79 6.2.1 Geology, Terrain and Soils .................................................................................................. 79 6.2.2 Groundwater and Surface Water ......................................................................................... 80 6.2.3 Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat ................................................................................................. 80 6.2.4 Vegetation ............................................................................................................................ 84 6.2.5 Fish and Fish Habitat ........................................................................................................... 87 661910 August 2020 ii . Webequie Supply Road Environmental Assessment Terms of Reference 6.2.6 Species at Risk .................................................................................................................... 89 6.2.7 Climate ................................................................................................................................. 97 6.2.8 Air Quality ............................................................................................................................. 97 6.2.9 Acoustic Environment .......................................................................................................... 97 6.3 Socio-Economic Environment ..................................................................................................... 97 6.3.1 Regional Planning/Policy Initiatives ..................................................................................... 97 6.3.2 Economy, Resources, Commercial and Industrial Activities ............................................... 99 6.3.3 Population, Demographics and Community Profile ............................................................. 99 6.3.4 Human Health .................................................................................................................... 100 6.3.5 Infrastructure
Recommended publications
  • Assessing the Influence of First Nation Education Counsellors on First Nation Post-Secondary Students and Their Program Choices
    Assessing the Influence of First Nation Education Counsellors on First Nation Post-Secondary Students and their Program Choices by Pamela Williamson A dissertation submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Higher Education Graduate Department of Theory and Policy Studies in Education Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto © Copyright by Pamela Williamson (2011) Assessing the Influence of First Nation Education Counsellors on First Nation Post-Secondary Students and their Post-Secondary Program Choices Doctor of Higher Education 2011 Pamela Williamson Department of Theory and Policy Studies in Education University of Toronto Abstract The exploratory study focused on First Nation students and First Nation education counsellors within Ontario. Using an interpretative approach, the research sought to determine the relevance of the counsellors as a potentially influencing factor in the students‘ post-secondary program choices. The ability of First Nation education counsellors to be influential is a consequence of their role since they administer Post- Secondary Student Support Program (PSSSP) funding. A report evaluating the program completed by Indian and Northern Affairs Canada in 2005 found that many First Nation students would not have been able to achieve post-secondary educational levels without PSSSP support. Eight self-selected First Nation Education counsellors and twenty-nine First Nation post- secondary students participated in paper surveys, and five students and one counsellor agreed to complete a follow-up interview. The quantitative and qualitative results revealed differences in the perceptions of the two survey groups as to whether First Nation education counsellors influenced students‘ post-secondary program choices.
    [Show full text]
  • TOXIC WATER: the KASHECHEWAN STORY Introduction It Was the Straw That Broke the Prover- Had Been Under a Boil-Water Alert on and Focus Bial Camel’S Back
    TOXIC WATER: THE KASHECHEWAN STORY Introduction It was the straw that broke the prover- had been under a boil-water alert on and Focus bial camel’s back. A fax arrived from off for years. In fall 2005, Canadi- Health Canada (www.hc-sc.gc.ca) at the A week after the water tested positive ans were stunned to hear of the Kashechewan First Nations council for E. coli, Indian Affairs Minister appalling living office, revealing that E. coli had been Andy Scott arrived in Kashechewan. He conditions on the detected in the reserve’s drinking water. offered to provide the people with more Kashechewan First Enough was enough. A community bottled water but little else. Incensed by Nations Reserve in already plagued by poverty and unem- Scott’s apparent indifference, the Northern Ontario. ployment was now being poisoned by community redoubled their efforts, Initial reports documented the its own water supply. Something putting pressure on the provincial and presence of E. coli needed to be done, and some members federal governments to evacuate those in the reserve’s of the reserve had a plan. First they who were suffering from the effects of drinking water. closed down the schools. Next, they the contaminated water. The Ontario This was followed called a meeting of concerned members government pointed the finger at Ot- by news of poverty and despair, a of the community. Then they launched tawa because the federal government is reflection of a a media campaign that shifted the responsible for Canada’s First Nations. standard of living national spotlight onto the horrendous Ottawa pointed the finger back at the that many thought conditions in this remote, Northern province, saying that water safety and unimaginable in Ontario reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • KWG Resources Inc. Risk Rating: Speculative
    July 10, 2013 Equity Research Initiating Coverage KWG:TSX-V $0.055 (07/09/14) Recommendation: Speculative BUY Target Price: $0.20 KWG Resources Inc. Risk Rating: Speculative A New Technology for a New Chromite District: KWG Stock Chart The New King of the Ring? Highlights: We are initiating our coverage on KWG Resources with a $0.20 target price and Speculative BUY rating. KWG is an exploration company with interests in the highly-prospective Black Horse and Big Daddy chromite deposits in the McFaulds Lake area of the Ring of Fire ("ROF") district in northwestern Ontario. More importantly, KWG recently secured control of two provisional U.S. patent applications and underlying intellectual property for the production of chromium- iron alloys directly from chromite ores and concentrates (“the Chromium IP”), which we believe represents a potential breakthrough technology that could be the key to unlocking the ROF. The Chromium IP process uses natural gas as its energy source which compares favourably to existing ferrochrome technology that is more energy-intensive as it uses electricity as its energy source and operates at higher temperatures. We believe that KWG’s most important initiative should be advancing the commercialization of this new Chromium IP process. We believe that KWG should bring in an existing ferrochrome or integrated steel producer with a strong balance sheet as a strategic partner to more quickly advance the commercialization process. Secondly, the Company needs to rationalize its option to acquire an 80% interest in the Black Horse chromite deposit into a clear path to owning 100% in order to negotiate with potential strategic partners.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Description of and Rationale for Alternatives
    Webequie Supply Road Environmental Assessment Terms of Reference 5 Description of and Rationale for Alternatives This section of the ToR provides a description of how and why project alternatives were developed, and a comparative screening of the alternative corridors considered to arrive at the corridor within which alignment options (alternative methods for implementing the Undertaking) will be considered to select the preferred option for assessment in the EA study and for more detailed engineering investigations and design development. 5.1 Range of Alternatives Considered The Ontario EA process requires that two types of project alternatives be considered: “alternatives to” the Undertaking (i.e., functionally different ways of addressing an identified problem or opportunity to arrive at the preferred planning solution) and “alternative methods” of carrying out the Undertaking (options for implementing the preferred planning solution). 5.1.1 Alternatives to the Undertaking The range of “alternatives to” the Project (i.e., functionally different ways of approaching the opportunities identified by Webequie First Nation to improve the community’s economic and social well-being) was limited by the primary objectives of the Project, as determined by Webequie First Nation: › Establish an all-season corridor that will facilitate the movement of materials, supplies and people between the Webequie Airport and the mineral exploration and proposed mine development activities in the McFaulds Lake area of Northwestern Ontario (specifically, the camps, the drilling/exploration projects and, in the future, mining facilities); › Provide enhanced employment and other economic development opportunities to Webequie community members, while also allowing them to continue to reside in or around their community’s traditional territory, engage in traditional uses of that land, and preserve their language and culture; and, › Provide experience/training opportunities for youth to help encourage pursuit of additional skills through post-secondary education.
    [Show full text]
  • Omushkegowuk Weenuski-Inninowuk Otaskiwao
    ᐧᐄᓈᐢᑯ ᐃᓂᓂᐧᐊᐠ Omushkegowuk Weenuski-Inninowuk Otaskiwao TERMS OF REFERENCE Community Based Land Use Planning 2017 November 20, 2017 Prepared For: Weenusk First Nation and the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Terms of Reference Weenusk First Nation Terms of Reference Community Based Land Use Planning December 18, 2017 Weenusk First Nation and the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry are pleased to sign the Terms of Reference for the Weenusk First Nation Community Based Land Use Plan. Approvals have been provided by: Weenusk First Nation Band Council Resolution; and Ontario, by the Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry administering the Far North Act. As we begin this planning process, Weenusk First Nation and the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry affirm our commitment to work together with mutual respect and in good faith. On behalf of Weenusk First Nation On behalf of Ontario Chief Edmund Hunter Honourable Nathalie De Rosiers Weenusk First Nation Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry i Terms of Reference Terms of Reference Community Based Land Use Planning Initiative TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 5 PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................... 5 EXPECTED OUTCOMES ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Webequie Supply Road DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
    Webequie Supply Road DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION Webequie First Nation The Picture is a Placeholder Only Prepared by: Prepared for: Submitted to: SNC-Lavalin Inc. Webequie First Nation Impact Assessment Agency of Canada 195 The West Mall Toronto, Ontario, M9C 5K1 www.snclavalin.com November 2019 661910 Webequie Supply Road Detailed Project Description PREFACE This Detailed Project Description for the Webequie Supply Road Project (“the Project”) has been prepared in accordance with subsection 15(1) of the Impact Assessment Act (“IAA”) and Schedule 2 of the Act’s Information and Management of Time Limits Regulations (“the Regulations”) of the Impact Assessment Act - Information Required in Detailed Description of Designated Project. In addition, the Detailed Project Description reflects the Webequie Supply Road Project Team’s recognition of issues identified in the Summary of Issues prepared by the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (the Agency) as a result of the Agency’s invitation to Indigenous groups, federal and provincial authorities, the public and other participants to provide their perspective on any issues that they consider relevant in relation to the Project. Information provided by the Agency (posted on the Canadian Impact Assessment Registry) for this purpose included the Initial Project Description. The document that was accepted by the Agency to serve as the Initial Project Description was prepared to comply with the requirements of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 and was initially released for public review under the CEAA, 2012 process in July 2019, during the period when the Government of Canada was preparing to bring into force and transition to the new Impact Assessment Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Life Safety Risks to the Kashechewan First Nation Community Canadian Consulting Engineering Awards
    Reducing Life Safety Risks to the Kashechewan First Nation Community Canadian Consulting Engineering Awards • • • • • • Figure 1: Dam Safety Risk Assessment Tool Figure 2: Flood Forecast Tool De : Lamirande-Gauvin, Gabrielle A : Ducharme, Sophie Objet : FW: Canadian Consulting Engineer Awards - your entry Date : Friday, April 20, 2018 2:25:39 PM FYI Gabrielle Lamirande-Gauvin Global Marketing Manager, Energy Marketing Lead, Eastern North America From: Canadian Consulting Engineer [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: April 20, 2018 2:24 PM To: Lamirande-Gauvin, Gabrielle <[email protected]> Subject: Canadian Consulting Engineer Awards - your entry DO NOT REPLY Project Information Project Name Reducing Life Safety Risks to the Kashechewan First Nation Community Location of Project Not applicable Kashechewan First Nation, Ontario Canada Map It Completed by 2017 To be entered in Category C. Water Resources Entering Firms Firm Name(s) Hatch/FHR Inc. Firm Address 2800 Speakman Drive Mississauga, Ontario L5K 2R7 Canada Map It Role in the Project Research and Studies to quantify the flooding risks associated with an ageing dam to a remote First Nations Community and develop solutions to reduce these risks. Member of the Association of Consulting Engineering Companies of Canada (ACEC)? Yes Contact #1 (Communications/Marketing/Public Relations) Gabrielle Lamirande-Gauvin Phone for Contact #1 (514) 864-5500 Email for Contact #1 [email protected] Contact #2 (Management/Administration) Gabrielle Lamirande-Gauvin Phone for Contact #2 (514) 864-5500 Email for Contact #2 [email protected] Contact #3 (Project Engineer) C. Richard Donnelly Phone for Contact #3 (905) 357-6970 Email for Contact #3 [email protected] P.Eng? Yes Project Outline Project Summary The Kashechewan Ring Dyke protects over 2000 residents of a remote community from flooding that occurs during spring break up.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Profiles for the Oneca Education And
    FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 Political/Territorial Facts About This Community Phone Number First Nation and Address Nation and Region Organization or and Fax Number Affiliation (if any) • Census data from 2006 states Aamjiwnaang First that there are 706 residents. Nation • This is a Chippewa (Ojibwe) community located on the (Sarnia) (519) 336‐8410 Anishinabek Nation shores of the St. Clair River near SFNS Sarnia, Ontario. 978 Tashmoo Avenue (Fax) 336‐0382 • There are 253 private dwellings in this community. SARNIA, Ontario (Southwest Region) • The land base is 12.57 square kilometres. N7T 7H5 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 506 residents. Alderville First Nation • This community is located in South‐Central Ontario. It is 11696 Second Line (905) 352‐2011 Anishinabek Nation intersected by County Road 45, and is located on the south side P.O. Box 46 (Fax) 352‐3242 Ogemawahj of Rice Lake and is 30km north of Cobourg. ROSENEATH, Ontario (Southeast Region) • There are 237 private dwellings in this community. K0K 2X0 • The land base is 12.52 square kilometres. COPYRIGHT OF THE ONECA EDUCATION PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM 1 FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 406 residents. • This Algonquin community Algonquins of called Pikwàkanagàn is situated Pikwakanagan First on the beautiful shores of the Nation (613) 625‐2800 Bonnechere River and Golden Anishinabek Nation Lake. It is located off of Highway P.O. Box 100 (Fax) 625‐1149 N/A 60 and is 1 1/2 hours west of Ottawa and 1 1/2 hours south of GOLDEN LAKE, Ontario Algonquin Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Terms of Reference Sections 10-11
    DRAFT Marten Falls First Nation Draft Terms of Reference Marten Falls Community Access Road – Environmental Assessment Prepared by: AECOM Canada Ltd. 105 Commerce Valley Drive West, 7th Floor Markham, ON L3T 7W3 Canada SECTIONS: 10 AND 11 T: 905.886.7022 F: 905.886.9494 www.aecom.com Date: November, 2019 Project #: 60593122 AECOM Marten Falls First Nation Draft Terms of Reference Marten Falls Community Access Road – Environmental Assessment 10. Consultation During the ToR The following describes the results of the public and Indigenous community consultation program that has been undertaken up to October 11, 2019. The ToR consultation activities are continuing through fall 2019 to spring 2020, including the release of this Draft ToR. The results of these ongoing consultation activities will be documented in the Final or “Proposed” ToR that will be submitted to MECP for an approval decision. These ongoing ToR consultation activities and inputs will also feed into the development of the EA Consultation program that is outlined in draft in Section 11. 10.1 Principles of Consultation A primary objective of the EA process, including the ToR development, is to effectively communicate information about the proposed CAR, and to consult with those who may be potentially affected by or have an interest in it. MFFN is committed to creating and sustaining constructive dialogue and relationships with interested persons including MFFN community membership, neighbouring Indigenous communities, government agencies, the public, industry, non-government organizations, and local and regional stakeholders, to support the environmental, social and economic sustainability of the proposed CAR. To honour the traditional lands that the CAR is proposed to be developed on and to respect MFFN traditional teachings5, the Guiding Principles presented in Figure 10-1 will be followed throughout all Project-related consultation activities and the full EA process; from preparation of the ToR to preparation of the EA and implementation of the CAR.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Existing Environmental Conditions in the Study Area 6.1 Study Area
    Webequie Supply Road Environmental Assessment Draft Terms of Reference 6 Existing Environmental Conditions in the Study Area 6.1 Study Area The Project is located in Northwestern Ontario, with the northern end of the road approximately 525 km northeast of Thunder Bay (refer to Figure 1.1). The Project is located on provincial Crown land, Webequie First Nation Reserve land under federal jurisdiction), and the traditional territories of Indigenous communities (refer also to Section 6.4.6 Land and Resource Use). Figure 6.1 illustrates the location of the alternative routes in relation to project area features and sensitivities. Due to confidentiality constraints (including those imposed by Webequie First Nation and Government of Ontario ministries), and the need to respect the wishes of potentially affected Indigenous communities with respect to divulging certain information on the use of lands in the project area, it is not possible to illustrate the location or bounds of a number of features and sensitivities, including First Nations’ traditional territories, individual camps/cabins, species at risk (e.g., caribou ranges), and government-regulated hunting areas (e.g., trapline licences). However, sensitive features and resources are described in general terms in this section of the ToR. The EA will summarize past investigations and analyses of alternative road alignments between Webequie and the mineral deposit area near McFaulds Lake, and will assess the potential impacts of alternative alignments in the preferred corridor for the Webequie Supply Road. The significance of an environmental impact partially depends on the geographic extent. As such, the impact assessment will be conducted on the basis of specific study areas related to the project development, adopting a multi-scale approach for describing baseline conditions (existing environment) and predicting effects from the Project.
    [Show full text]
  • NALSC E-Newsletter Dec2020
    NISHNAWBE-ASKI LEGAL SERVICES Newsletter Dec 2020 IN THIS ISSUE: Human Resources 2 Welcome to Legal Aid 3 Roberta Wesley 4 NALSC E-Newsletter Highway Traffic Act 5 NALSC Staff are working and available to assist! Staff Discharge Planning Team 8 PLE Update 9 are available through a mix of in person, walk-in, by RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PROGRAM: appointment and by video and telephone across the Virtual Programming 10 territory. In this issue you will find some of the highlights, Vernon Morris 11 various legal information, updated contacts, as well Natasha Sakschekapo 12 as what has been going on in the past few months at Domestic Violence 13 Martah Kataquapit 14 NALSC. Shirly Keesick 15 Restorataive Justice Have a safe and happy holiday! Referral Form 16 GLADUE: George Edwards 18 Bios 19 Referral Form 23 Honouring Sheba Fox 24 Sewing Nights 25 1805 Arthur Street East, Thunder Bay, ON P7E 2R6 Talking Together Referral Form 26 Toll Free: 1-800-465-5581 Sioux Lookout: 47 A Front Street, PO box 187, Sioux Lookout ON P8T 1A3 Staff Directory 29 Phone: 807-737-7981 Toll Free: 1- 866-468-5151 Fax: 807- 737- 7297 Board of Directors Back Cover Timmins: 119 Pine Street S. Suite 210, Timmins ON P4N 2K3 Phone: 705-268-1105 Fax: 705-268-0012 Kenora: 308 Second Street S. Suite 14, Kenora ON, P9N 1G4 Please contact Thunder Bay Office for phone contact information Human Resources WHAT ARE YOU UP TO DURING COVID-19? HOW ARE STAFF STAYING SAFE? ishnawbe-Aski Legal Services has taken many steps to protect the safety of all our staff and clients so we can continue to provide our services to the NAN communitiesN and clients.
    [Show full text]
  • Michelle Derosier
    Michelle Derosier Thunder Bay, ON Cell: 807.707.2504 [email protected] EDUCATION 1995-2000 Honours Bachelor of Social Work (HBSW), Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON. EMPLOYMENT 2006 – Present – Filmmaker / Co-owner – Thunderstone Pictures Inc., Thunder Bay, ON. 2013 - Trauma Team Member – Pikangikum First Nation – Sioux Lookout First Nation Health Authority, Sioux Lookout, ON. 2007 - 2010 - Social Worker – Lakehead University - Thunder Bay, ON. SELECTED FILM EXPERIENCE Writer / Co-Director /Co-Producer Angeliques Isle (2018) Drama, 90mins, Thunderstone Pictures Inc., Circle Blue Films and Freddy Films. Toronto, ON and Thunder Bay, ON. Writer/Director Amplify (Post Production) Director of one episode in a 13-part series. APTN, 2019. Artist: Nick Sherman. Thunder Bay, ON. Writer / Director /Co-Producer Chipikaakitooyang [‘Coming Together To Talk] (2016) Documentary,110 mins, Thunderstone Pictures Inc., Thunder Bay, ON. Writer / Director /Co-Producer The Grandfather Drum (2015) Animation, 13 mins, Thunderstone Pictures and Stem to Stern Design Co., Thunder Bay, ON. Producer Fire Song (2015) Drama, 90 mins, Adam Garnet Jones, Big Soul Productions and Thunderstone Pictures Inc., Fort William First Nation & Wabigoon Lake Ojibway Nation, ON. Director The Doctor Can See You Now (2015) Documentary, 48 mins, TVO and Title Entertainment Inc. ON. Television world premiere of “The Doctor Can See You Now” aired on TVO’s ‘The View From Here’ in October 2015 Writer / Director/Producer Walk-a-Mile Film Project (2013) A Documentary Film Series (5 films - 15 mins), The City of Thunder Bay – Aboriginal Liaison Unit and Thunderstone Pictures, Thunder Bay, ON Writer / Director Muskikki: Addressing the Need (2012) Documentary, 22 mins, Thunderstone Pictures and The Sioux Lookout First Nations Health Authority, filmed in the remote community of Mishkeegogamang First Nation and Sioux Lookout, ON Senior Production Audio Mixer CBC - The Fifth Estate: Stories From The River’s Edge (2011), Investigative Documentary, 44 mins, XDCAM HD, CBC Toronto.
    [Show full text]