DOCSLIB.ORG

Modeling, Simulation, and Operations Analysis in Afghanistan and Iraq Operational Vignettes, Lessons Learned, and a Survey of Selected Efforts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modeling, Simulation, and Operations Analysis in Afghanistan and Iraq Operational Vignettes, Lessons Learned, and a Survey of Selected Efforts CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Support RAND Purchase this document Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Defense Research Institute View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that ad- dress the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for re- search quality and objectivity. Modeling, Simulation, and Operations Analysis in Afghanistan and Iraq Operational Vignettes, Lessons Learned, and a Survey of Selected Efforts Ben Connable, Walter L. Perry, Abby Doll, Natasha Lander, Dan Madden C O R P O R A T I O N NATIONAL DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE Modeling, Simulation, and Operations Analysis in Afghanistan and Iraq Operational Vignettes, Lessons Learned, and a Survey of Selected Efforts Ben Connable, Walter L. Perry, Abby Doll, Natasha Lander, Dan Madden Prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation Approved for public release; distribution unlimited This research was sponsored by OSD-CAPE and conducted within the International Security and Defense Policy Center of the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community under contract W74V8H-06-C-0002. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data ISBN: 978-0-8330-8211-4 The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND—make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute.html R® is a registered trademark. Photo by Cpl. Ruben D. Maestre © Copyright 2014 RAND Corporation This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see the RAND permissions page (www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.html). RAND OFFICES SANTA MONICA, CA • WASHINGTON, DC PITTSBURGH, PA • NEW ORLEANS, LA • JACKSON, MS • BOSTON, MA DOHA, QA • CAMBRIDGE, UK • BRUSSELS, BE www.rand.org Preface The Office of the Secretary of Defense, Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (OSD-CAPE) asked RAND to conduct a lessons learned examination of analysis, modeling, and simulation in Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF), and Operation New Dawn (OND) to help improve resource alloca- tions in these activities. This effort will identify decisions at all levels of counterin- surgency and, more broadly, irregular warfare that could benefit from more extensive and rigorous modeling and simulation. It also identifies ways in which analysts have attempted to address these decisions, describes many of the models and tools they employed, provides insight into the challenges they faced, and suggests ways in which the application of modeling, simulation, and analysis might be improved for current and future operations. Interviews and review of analytic activities focused on the expe- rience of analysts and their consumers in U.S. forces in OEF, OIF, and OND from late 2001 through early 2012. This research was sponsored by OSD-CAPE and conducted within the Interna- tional Security and Defense Policy Center of the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community. For more information on the International Security and Defense Policy Center, see http://www.rand.org/nsrd/ndri/centers/isdp.html or contact the Director (contact information is provided on webpage). iii Contents Preface ............................................................................................... iii Figures and Tables ..................................................................................ix Summary .............................................................................................xi Acknowledgments ............................................................................... xvii Abbreviations ...................................................................................... xix CHaptER ONE Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 Clarifying Terminology .............................................................................. 3 Use of the Term Model in This Report ........................................................... 3 Use of the Term Simulation in This Report ...................................................... 4 Defining and Differentiating Between “Analysis” and “Assessment” ......................... 5 Differences Between Campaign Assessment and Intelligence Analysis ...................... 8 Systems Analysis .................................................................................... 8 Why Are COIN and IW So Difficult to Analyze and Assess? .................................. 9 Research Objectives and Limits ....................................................................10 Focus on Operations for the Army and Marine Corps ........................................11 Methodology .........................................................................................11 About This Report .................................................................................. 12 CHaptER TWO Decision Issues and Analysis in COIN and IW Literature ................................ 13 Two Highly Relevant Publications ................................................................ 13 TRAC Irregular Warfare Working Group Report .............................................14 CAA Deployed Analyst History for OIF .......................................................16 Decision Issues Identified in Literature ............................................................19 M&S and Analytical Methods Identified in Literature .........................................21 Demonstrated IW Decision Support Identified in Literature ..................................21 Courses of Action Associated with Families of Analysis ..................................... 22 Kinetic Activity Decisions Supported by Physics-Based Analysis ........................... 23 Kinetic Activity Decisions Supported by Social Science Analysis .......................... 25 v vi Modeling, Simulation, and Operations Analysis in Afghanistan and Iraq Nonkinetic Activity Decisions Supported by Physics-Based Analysis ...................... 27 Nonkinetic Activity Decisions Supported by Social Science Analysis ...................... 28 Pattern and Trend Analysis and Assessment ................................................... 30 Literature Identifies Factors That Hindered Analytic Support to Commanders .......... 33 Operations Researchers Have Their Say About IW Assessment: MORS Workshops .... 35 Summary of Decision and Analytic Issues in the Literature ................................... 39 Analysts should be vested in the problem. ..................................................... 40 Know how and where to find data, and compare data. ...................................... 40 Analysts must answer the question asked. ..................................................... 40 Help commanders understand complexity. .................................................... 41 Build credibility as an analyst. .................................................................. 41 Know the players, use all available tools—both art and science. ...........................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Operations Research and Simulation in Master's
    Proceedings of the 2013 Winter Simulation Conference R. Pasupathy, S.-H. Kim, A. Tolk, R. Hill, and M. E. Kuhl, eds OPERATIONS RESEARCH AND SIMULATION IN MASTER’S DEGREES: A CASE STUDY REGARDING DIFFERENT UNIVERSITIES IN SPAIN Alex Grasas Angel A. Juan Helena Ramalhinho Dept. of Economics and Business Dept. of Computer Science Universitat Pompeu Fabra / IN3 – Open University of Catalonia / Barcelona GSE Autonomous University of Barcelona Barcelona, 08005, SPAIN Barcelona, 08018, SPAIN ABSTRACT This paper presents several experiences regarding Operations Research (OR) and Simulation education activities in three master programs, each of them offered at a different university. The paper discusses the importance of teaching these contents in most managerial and engineering masters. After a brief overview of existing related work, the paper provides some recommendations –based on our own teaching experi- ences– that instructors should keep in mind when designing OR/Simulation courses, either in traditional face-to-face as well as in pure online learning models. The case studies exposed here include students from business management, computer science, and aeronautical management degrees, respectively. For each type of student, different OR/Simulation tools are employed in the courses, ranging from easy-to-use optimization and simulation software to simulation-based algorithms developed from scratch using a pro- gramming language. 1 INTRODUCTION Operations Research (OR) can be defined as the application of advanced analytical methods to support complex decision-making processes. Among others, some of these analytical methods are: simulation, da- ta analysis, mathematical optimization, and metaheuristics. Thus, OR is an interdisciplinary area which borrows methods and techniques from many fields, including: mathematics, computer science, statistics, and business management.
    [Show full text]
  • Module 1 (Computer Modeling and Simulation) Introduction
    Module 1: Modeling and Simulation MODULE 1 (COMPUTER MODELING AND SIMULATION) INTRODUCTION Module Name: Introduction to Computer Modeling and Simulation Content of this Introduction: 1. Overview of the Module 2. Prerequisite knowledge and assumptions encompassed by the Module 3. Standards covered by the Module 4. Materials needed for the Module 5. Pacing Guides for 6 Lessons, including Learning Objectives and Assessment Questions 1. Overview of the Module This module introduces basic concepts in modeling complex systems through hands-on activities and participatory simulations. A scaffolded series of highly-engaging design and build activities guide students through developing their first computer model in StarLogo Nova, a modeling and simulation environment developed at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Students practice designing and running experiments using a computer model as a virtual test bed. 2. Prerequisite knowledge and assumptions encompassed by the Module There are no prerequisites for Module 1. The module was designed to be an introduction to computer modeling and simulation for students with no prior background in the topic. It is necessary to complete this module prior to commencing the Earth, Life or Physical Science module. 3. Standards covered by the Module Please see the Standards Document for a detailed description of Standards covered by this Module, Lesson by Lesson. 4. Materials needed for this Module You will need the following materials to teach this module: • Computer and projector • What is a CAS? document
    [Show full text]
  • 9/11 Report”), July 2, 2004, Pp
    Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page i THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page v CONTENTS List of Illustrations and Tables ix Member List xi Staff List xiii–xiv Preface xv 1. “WE HAVE SOME PLANES” 1 1.1 Inside the Four Flights 1 1.2 Improvising a Homeland Defense 14 1.3 National Crisis Management 35 2. THE FOUNDATION OF THE NEW TERRORISM 47 2.1 A Declaration of War 47 2.2 Bin Ladin’s Appeal in the Islamic World 48 2.3 The Rise of Bin Ladin and al Qaeda (1988–1992) 55 2.4 Building an Organization, Declaring War on the United States (1992–1996) 59 2.5 Al Qaeda’s Renewal in Afghanistan (1996–1998) 63 3. COUNTERTERRORISM EVOLVES 71 3.1 From the Old Terrorism to the New: The First World Trade Center Bombing 71 3.2 Adaptation—and Nonadaptation— ...in the Law Enforcement Community 73 3.3 . and in the Federal Aviation Administration 82 3.4 . and in the Intelligence Community 86 v Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page vi 3.5 . and in the State Department and the Defense Department 93 3.6 . and in the White House 98 3.7 . and in the Congress 102 4. RESPONSES TO AL QAEDA’S INITIAL ASSAULTS 108 4.1 Before the Bombings in Kenya and Tanzania 108 4.2 Crisis:August 1998 115 4.3 Diplomacy 121 4.4 Covert Action 126 4.5 Searching for Fresh Options 134 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Moves Issue34.Pdf
    2 MOVES nr. 34, published August/September 1977 Opening Moves "It seems we've stood and talked like thb before . " Variation versus Innovation One of the most powerful words in advertis- Circulation: 9100 ing is "new" - probably because in Western culture that which is new is almost always Editor/Executive Art Director Redmond A. Simonsen considered automatically better than that Managing Editor Robert J. Ryer which is old or familiar. The impact of the Art Director Manfred F. Milkuhn concept of newness, however, is subject to Contributing Editors modification by context; i.e., the quality of Richard Berg, James F. Dunnigan, Frederick Georgian, newness must be perceived as an improve- Phil Kosnett, Steve List, Mark Saha, Jerrold Thomas ment upon a familiar benefit rather than as a threatening global change wrenching the MOVES Magazine is copyright O 1977, Simulations Publications, Inc. Printed in U.S.A. All rights reserved. All user into unfamiliar pathways, creating that editorial and general mail should beaddressed to SimulationsPublications lnc.,44East 23rd Street, N.Y., N.Y. 10010. of tension (created by too-rapid in- MOVES is published bimonthly. One year subscriptions (six issues) are available for $8.00 (U.S.). Back issues or singlecopiesofthecurrentissueareavailableat$2.50percopy.Pleaseremitbycheckormoneyorder(U.S.fundsonly) trOduction of unknowns) "future- Printing and Binding by American Press, Inc., Gordonsville, Va. shock." ARTICLE SUBMISSIONS: Readers are invited to submit articles for possible publication in MOVES Magazine. wargamers hunger for new games, but Manuscripts must be typewritten, double-spaced, on 8%x 11 white bond, with generous margins. Pleaseinclude your we full name on each MS page, and your name and address on the cover page.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 9 – Modeling, Simulation, and Systems Engineering
    Lecture 9 – Modeling, Simulation, and Systems Engineering • Development steps • Model-based control engineering • Modeling and simulation • Systems platform: hardware, systems software. EE392m - Spring 2005 Control Engineering 9-1 Gorinevsky Control Engineering Technology • Science – abstraction – concepts – simplified models • Engineering – building new things – constrained resources: time, money, • Technology – repeatable processes • Control platform technology • Control engineering technology EE392m - Spring 2005 Control Engineering 9-2 Gorinevsky Controls development cycle • Analysis and modeling – Control algorithm design using a simplified model – System trade study - defines overall system design • Simulation – Detailed model: physics, or empirical, or data driven – Design validation using detailed performance model • System development – Control application software – Real-time software platform – Hardware platform • Validation and verification – Performance against initial specs – Software verification – Certification/commissioning EE392m - Spring 2005 Control Engineering 9-3 Gorinevsky Algorithms/Analysis Much more than real-time control feedback computations • modeling • identification • tuning • optimization • feedforward • feedback • estimation and navigation • user interface • diagnostics and system self-test • system level logic, mode change EE392m - Spring 2005 Control Engineering 9-4 Gorinevsky Model-based Control Development Conceptual Control design model: Conceptual control sis algorithm: y Analysis x(t+1) = x(t) +
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Artificial Intelligence, Simulation, and Modeling
    Book Reviews AI Magazine Volume 12 Number 1 (1991) (© AAAI) BookReviews Artificial Intelligence, Numeric simulation is used for what- applied in modeling and simulation Simulation, and Modeling if questions, but diagnosis and expla- as the quantitative approach (for nation by symbolic reasoning are example, minimizing an objective Mark E. Lacy used for why questions. Execution on function that describes how well a computing machinery can be differ- model fits the available data). Typi- As a system scientist doing modeling ent as well: AI tools do not lend cally, the systems challenging us are and simulation, I have been interested themselves to the advantages of par- complex, and we are lucky if we can for some time in ways that modeling allel architectures as well as mathe- make any qualitative statements and simulation and AI could be of value matical tools do, and systems that about the behavior of a system other to each other. After all, both areas have attempt to integrate AI and mathe- than, perhaps, statements regarding their roots in putting knowledge into matical approaches pose a real chal- stability or long-term steady-state useful representations. I have specu- lenge to the development of fast behavior. Only the simplest of systems lated (AI Magazine, summer 1989, pp. software and hardware. can be analyzed in terms of its quali- 4348) that the scientist of the future, There is great potential, however, tative behavior. This reason is one of in applying computing to his(her) for AI and simulation to take advantage the main ones for performing simu- work, could benefit from a virtual of each other’s strengths.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Modeling and Simulation for Systems of Systems Engineering Saurabh Mittal, Ph.D
    System of Systems – Innovations for the 21 st Center, Edited by [Mo Jamshidi]. ISBN 0-471-XXXXX-X Copyright © 2008 Wiley[Imprint], Inc. 5 Modeling and Simulation for Systems of Systems Engineering Saurabh Mittal, Ph.D. Bernard P. Zeigler, Ph.D. Arizona Center for Integrative Modeling and Simulation Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Arizona Tucson, AZ José L. Risco Martín, Ph.D. Departamento de Arquitectura de Computadores y Automática Facultad de Informática Universidad Complutense de Madrid Madrid, Spain Ferat Sahin, Ph.D. Multi Agent Bio-Robotics Laboratory Electrical Engineering Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester, NY Mo Jamshidi, Ph.D. Lutcher Brown Endowed Chair Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Texas San Antonio San Antonio, TX Wiley STM / Mo Jamshidi: System of Systems - Innovation for the 21st Century page 2 Chapter 5 / Mittal, Zeigler, Martin, Sahin, Jamshidi / filename: ch5.doc Abstract: A critical aspect and differentiator of a System of Systems (SoS) versus a single monolithic system is interoperability among the constituent disparate systems. A major application of Modeling and Simulation (M&S) to SoS Engineering is to facilitate system integration in a manner that helps to cope with such interoperability problems. A case in point is the integration infrastructure offered by the DoD Global Information Grid (GIG) and its Service Oriented Architecture (SOA). In this chapter, we discuss a process called DEVS Unified Process (DUNIP) that uses the Discrete Event System Specification (DEVS) formalism as a basis for integrated system engineering and testing called the Bifurcated Model- Continuity life-cycle development methodology. DUNIP uses an XML-based DEVS Modeling Language (DEVSML) framework that provides the capability to compose models that may be expressed in a variety of DEVS implementation languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Computational Modeling and Simulation Engineering 4
    decision support. Visualization of these is also a significant part of these Department of areas. Collaborative Autonomous Systems Laboratory Computational Modeling The Collaborative Autonomous Systems Laboratory supports instructional and multidisciplinary research activities related to autonomous systems. and Simulation This forth laboratory area is shared with the mechanical and aerospace department. CMSE maintains 4 PC workstations and 10 various types of robotic systems. The lab contains an area dedicated to cyber security Engineering research as related to collaborative autonomous systems. Web Site: http://www.odu.edu/cmsv (http://www.odu.edu/cmsv/) The CAVE (CAVE Automated Virtual Environment) 1300 Engineering and Computational Sciences Building The CAVE (Cave Automated Virtual Environment) Virtual Reality 757-683-3720 laboratory area contains several 3D visualization systems. The CAVE is Yuzhong Shen, Chair a high-resolution projection-screen virtual reality system. The screens are Masha Sosonkina, Graduate Program Director arranged in a 10 foot cube with computer-generated images projected on three walls and a floor. The CAVE lab also contains a 3 meter Vision Dome Department Description projection system and an Immersa-Desk virtual reality display. Two 3D printers are also placed in the CAVE Lab. The CMSE Department offers an undergraduate four-year degree program leading to the Bachelor of Science in Modeling and Simulation Engineering Associated Centers: (BS-M&SE). The department also offers programs of graduate study leading to the degrees Master of Engineering, Master of Science, Doctor A significant resource to the department is the Virginia Modeling, Analysis of Engineering, and Doctor of Philosophy with a major in Modeling and and Simulation Center located adjacent to the University's Tri-Cities Higher Simulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling and Simulation Technologies Can Help U.S
    OUR ADVANCED SIMULATION CAPABILITIES MEAN YOU CAN TRAIN FROM ANYWHERE WITHOUT SACRIFICING TACTICAL REALISM. MODELING & SIMULATION Real-World Environments to Help You Train Like You Fight Success on the modern battlefield is a complex and rapidly evolving pursuit, as new enemies and technologies continue to emerge. The only way to ensure readiness in the face of this shifting landscape is for warfighters to train using the same scenarios, obstacles, and teamwork they’ll use on the field of battle, no matter how it changes. AN ENRICHED TRAINING APPROACH technology. By creating environments that mimic real-world Basic, stand-alone classroom training is not enough to build situations, we provide an opportunity for warfighters to a force that is ready to meet any challenge. But training at prepare in ways that would otherwise be difficult, dangerous, scale has traditionally been expensive and involved extensive and expensive. manual tuning. Fortunately, today’s modeling and simulation technologies can help U.S. defense and national security Our secure, comprehensive solutions encompass software, leaders enrich training for refined strategies, more predictable hardware, and networks to bring together live, virtual, outcomes, and optimal results. and constructive (LVC) assets in a fully-integrated, unified training battlespace. We are enhancing LVC training and Through distributed, highly-scalable, integrated training that simulation with machine learning, to test and calibrate remote incorporates live, virtual, computer-to-computer, and gaming system elements, while using deep learning to automate elements, U.S. warfighters can learn and reinforce their skills in content creation. The result is the development of training real-world environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Fine Games 2020 Annual Clearance
    12/5/2020 11:10:05AM Fine Games' 2020 Annual Clearance Catalog Page 1 of 52 Great Games at Really GREAT Prices ! www.FineGames.com/eoy_clear.htm Fine Games, 2078 Madrona St., North Bend, OR 97459-2143 USA email: [email protected] 541-756-4711 10am-9pm PST Fine Games' 2020 Annual Clearance Catalog is Big, Really BIG!. The largest sale we have ever offered. Initially, it includes a wide-ranging assortment of 672 games, magazines & gaming accessories -- nearly a third of the games we stock. Most are new & undamaged games or mags we simply have a few too many of; many are new games that suffered some minor damage at the hands of UPS. Many are too difficult to sell in the limited time before we begin to retire. Together, these sale items offer a thousand opportunities for great Xmas gifts for yourself or a significant other, some fun reading about game products from your past & others you might not know of. All at especially attractive prices. The Deal is this: We list 672 1056 items here with a special, clearance price good only during this sale, once each year. Choose as many or as few games as you wish. Contact us by phone (at 541-756-4711) or email ([email protected]) to place your order by 11/30/2020, and deliver payment to us promptly thereafter. In as little as 2 days later, your goodies will arrive in your awaiting hands. All bought at especially attractive Clearance Sale prices. Just act fast as these are offered first-come, first served, and are generally available in quantities of one, each (or sometimes 2 or 3).
    [Show full text]
  • Models of War 17701830
    History of European Ideas ISSN: 0191-6599 (Print) 1873-541X (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rhei20 Models of war 1770–1830: the birth of wargames and the trade-off between realism and simplicity Paul Schuurman To cite this article: Paul Schuurman (2017): Models of war 1770–1830: the birth of wargames and the trade-off between realism and simplicity, History of European Ideas, DOI: 10.1080/01916599.2017.1366928 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2017.1366928 © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 07 Sep 2017. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 60 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rhei20 Download by: [Erasmus University] Date: 29 September 2017, At: 02:24 HISTORY OF EUROPEAN IDEAS, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2017.1366928 Models of war 1770–1830: the birth of wargames and the trade-off between realism and simplicity Paul Schuurman Faculty of Philosophy, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands ABSTRACT KEYWORDS The first sophisticated wargames (military board games) were developed History of ideas 1770–1830; between 1770 and 1830 and are models of military conflict. Designers of wargames; models and these early games experimented fruitfully with different concepts that simulations; Napoleonic wars; were formulated in interaction with the external dynamics of the military philosophy of war systems that they tried to represent and the internal dynamics of the design process itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict in Afghanistan II
    Conflict in Afghanistan II 93 Number 881 March 2011 Volume Volume 93 Number 881 March 2011 Volume 93 Number 881 March 2011 Part 2: Law and humanitarian action Interview with Ms Fatima Gailani President of the Afghan Red Crescent Society Has the armed conflict in Afghanistan affected the rules on the conduct of hostilities? Robin Geiss and Michael Siegrist International law and armed non-state actors in Afghanistan Annyssa Bellal, Gilles Giacca and Stuart Casey-Maslen The Layha for the Mujahideen: an analysis of the code of conduct for the Taliban fighters under Islamic law Muhammad Munir Annex: The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. The Layha [Code of Conduct] For Mujahids Combatants, not bandits: the status of rebels in Islamic law Sadia Tabassum Between a rock and a hard place: integration or independence of humanitarian action? Antonio Donini The International Committee of the Red Cross in Afghanistan: Conflict II in Afghanistan reasserting the neutrality of humanitarian action Fiona Terry The protective scope of Common Article 3: more than meets the eye Jelena Pejic Humanitarian debate: Law, policy, action www.icrc.org/eng/review Conflict in Cambridge Journals Online For further information about this journal please go to the journal web site at: ISSN 1816-3831 http://www.journals.cambridge.org/irc Afghanistan II Editorial Team Editor-in-Chief: Vincent Bernard The Review is printed in English and is Editorial assistant: Michael Siegrist published four times a year, in March, Publication assistant: June, September and December. Claire Franc Abbas Annual selections of articles are also International Review of the Red Cross published on a regional level in Arabic, Aim and scope 19, Avenue de la Paix Chinese, French, Russian and Spanish.
    [Show full text]