Large Hadron Collider

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Large Hadron Collider April 15, 2008 ESSAY Gauging a Collider’s Odds of Creating a Black Hole By DENNIS OVERBYE In Walker Percy’s “Love in the Ruins,” the protagonist, a doctor and an inventor, recites what he calls the scientist’s prayer. It goes like this: “Lord, grant that my work increase knowledge and help other men. “Failing that, Lord, grant that it will not lead to man’s destruction. “Failing that, Lord, grant that my article in Brain be published before the destruction takes place.” Today we require more than prayers that a scientific experiment will not lead to the end of the world. We demand hard-headed calculations. But whom can we trust to do them? That question has been raised by the impending startup of the Large Hadron Collider. It starts smashing protons together this summer at the European Center for Nuclear Research, or Cern, outside Geneva, in hopes of grabbing a piece of the primordial fire, forces and particles that may have existed a trillionth of a second after the Big Bang. Critics have contended that the machine could produce a black hole that could eat the Earth or something equally catastrophic. To most physicists, this fear is more science fiction than science fact. At a recent open house weekend, 73,000 visitors, without pitchforks or torches, toured the collider without incident. Nevertheless, some experts say too much hype and not enough candor on the part of scientists about the promises and perils of what they do could boomerang into a public relations disaster for science, opening the door for charlatans and demagogues. In a paper published in 2000 with the title “Might a Laboratory Experiment Destroy Planet Earth?” Francesco Calogero, a nuclear physicist at the University of Rome and co-winner of the 1995 Nobel Peace Prize for his work with the Pugwash conferences on arms control, deplored a tendency among his colleagues to promulgate a “leave it to the experts” attitude. “Many, indeed most, of them,” he wrote, “seem to me to be more concerned with the public relations impact of what they, or others, say and write, than in making sure that the facts are presented with complete scientific objectivity.” One problem is that society has never agreed on a standard of what is safe in these surreal realms when the odds of disaster might be tiny but the stakes are cosmically high. In such situations, probability estimates are often no more than “informed betting odds,” said Martin Rees, a Cambridge University cosmologist, the astronomer royal and the author of “Our Final Hour.” Adrian Kent, also of Cambridge, said in a paper in 2003 reviewing scientists’ failure to calculate adequately and characterize accurately risks to the public, that even the most basic question, “ ‘How improbable does a catastrophe have to be to justify proceeding with an experiment?’ seems never to have been seriously examined.” Dr. Calogero commented, as did Dr. Kent, in 2000 after a very public battle on the safety of another accelerator, the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider, or Rhic, at the Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island. Dr. Calogero said he hoped to apply a gentle pressure on Cern to treat these issues with seriousness. “A crusade against it is a danger,” he said of the new collider. “It would not be based on rational argument.” Fears about the Brookhaven collider first centered on black holes but soon shifted to the danger posed by weird hypothetical particles, strangelets, that critics said could transform the Earth almost instantly into a dead, dense lump. Ultimately, independent studies by two groups of physicists calculated that the chances of this catastrophe were negligible, based on astronomical evidence and assumptions about the physics of the strangelets. One report put the odds of a strangelet disaster at less than one in 50 million, less than a chance of winning some lottery jackpots. Dr. Kent, in a 2003 paper, used the standard insurance company method to calculate expected losses to explore how stringent this bound on danger was. He multiplied the disaster probability times the cost, in this case the loss of the global population, six billion. A result was that, in actuarial terms, the Rhic collider could kill up to 120 people in a decade of operation. “Put this way, the bound seems far from adequately reassuring,” Dr. Kent wrote. Alvaro de Rujula of Cern, who was involved in writing a safety report, said extending the insurance formula that way violated common sense. “Applied to all imaginable catastrophes, it would result in World Paralysis,” he wrote. Besides, the random nature of quantum physics means that there is always a minuscule, but nonzero, chance of anything occurring, including that the new collider could spit out man-eating dragons. Doomsday from particle physics is part of the culture. Next year will see the release of the film version of “Angels and Demons,” the prequel to Dan Brown’s “DaVinci Code,” in which the bad guys use a Cern accelerator to gather antimatter for a bomb to blow up the Vatican, and it includes scenes at Cern. In Douglas Preston’s “Blasphemy,” a best seller last winter, the operators of a giant particle collider in New Mexico find themselves talking to an entity that sounds like God before religious collider in New Mexico find themselves talking to an entity that sounds like God before religious fanatics descend on the lab and destroy it. Some physicists, who have been waiting 14 years for the new collider, have proclaimed in papers and press releases increasingly ambitious and unlikely hopes, including proving a long-shot version of string theory by producing microscopic black holes. Inevitably, these black holes have taken center stage in the latest round of doomsday alarms. Most theorists will say the version of their theory that predicts black holes is extremely unlikely — though not impossible. But the chance that such a black hole would not instantly evaporate according to a theory famously propounded by Stephen Hawking in 1974 is even more weirdly unlikely, the theorists say. Cern’s most recent safety report, in 2003, focused mostly on refuting the strangelet threat in the hadron collider and devoted just three pages to black holes, saying they “do not present a conceivable risk.” It gave no odds. An anonymous Cern committee is working on a final, more comprehensive report. Neither Dr. Calogero nor Dr. Rees say they are losing sleep over the collider. Some risk is acceptable, even inevitable, in the pursuit of knowledge, they say, and they trust the physicists who have built it. But it would be more reassuring in the long run, as Dr. Kent noted, if everybody agreed beforehand how much risk is acceptable, before spending billions of dollars and major political capital. One popular option to determine acceptable risk is to demand that the chance of a man-made disaster be kept below the chance of a natural disaster like being obliterated by an asteroid. Astronomers estimate that chance as one in 50 million in any given year. Of course, thanks to those pesky quantum laws, disaster could come anytime. Or not. It could happen that the scientist’s prayer will be answered and your discovery will indeed lead to knowledge, human happiness and a new killer ap for iPhones. “As in all explorations of uncharted domains, there may be a risk,” Dr. Rees wrote, “but there is a hidden cost of saying no.” Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company Privacy Policy Search Corrections RSS First Look Help Contact Us Work for Us Site Map .
Recommended publications
  • Book of Abstracts
    The 19th Particles and Nuclei International Conference (PANIC11) Scientific Program Laboratory for Nuclear Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology July 24-29, 2011 Table of Contents Contents Sunday, 24 July 1 Pedagogical Lectures for Students - Kresge Auditorium (09:00-15:45)................. 1 Welcome Reception - Kresge Oval Tent (16:00-19:00) . ................... 1 Monday, 25 July 2 Opening Remarks - Kresge Auditorium (08:30-08:55) . ................... 2 Plenary1 - KresgeAuditorium (08:30-10:05) . ................. 2 Plenary1 - KresgeAuditorium (10:45-12:00) . ................. 2 Parallel 1A - Parity Violating Scattering - W20-307 (MezzanineLounge)(13:30-15:30) . 3 Parallel 1B - Nuclear Effects & Hadronization - W20-306 (20 Chimneys)(13:30-15:30) . 4 Parallel 1C - Recent Baryon Results I - W20-201 (West Lounge) (13:30-15:30). 6 Parallel 1D - Kaonic Atoms and Hypernuclear Physics - 4-149 (13:30-15:30) . 8 Parallel 1E - Neutrino Oscillations I - 4-163 (13:30-15:30) ....................... 10 Parallel 1F - Dark Forces and Dark Matter - 4-153 (13:30-15:30) ................... 12 Parallel 1G - P- and T-violating weak decays - Kresge - RehearsalA(13:30-15:30) . 14 Parallel 1H - Electroweak Cross Sections at the TeV Scale - Kresge - Rehearsal B (13:30-15:30) . 16 Parallel 1I - CKM & CP Violation - Kresge - Little Theatre (13:30-15:30) .............. 17 Parallel 1J - Collider Searches Beyond the Standard Model - Kresge Auditorium (13:30-15:30) . 18 Parallel 1K - Hydrodynamics - W20-407 (13:30-15:30) . ................... 19 Parallel 1L - Heavy Ion Collisions I - W20-491 (13:30-15:30) ...................... 20 Parallel 2A - Generalized Parton Distributions - W20-307 (Mezzanine Lounge) (16:00-17:40). 21 Parallel 2B - Parton Distribution Functions and Fits - W20-306 (20 Chimneys) (16:00-17:40) .
    [Show full text]
  • Future Emerging Technology Trends
    Federal Department of Defence, Civil Protection and Sport DDPS armasuisse Science and Technology Emerging Technology Trends 2015 Thun 2015 Credits Editor Federal Department of Defence, Civil Protection and Sport DDPS armasuisse Science and Technology Research Management and Operations Research www.armasuisse.ch/wt www.deftech.ch Author Dr. Quentin Ladetto Research Director - Technology Foresight [email protected] Release 1.3 Compiled on Tuesday 21st June, 2016 at 16:43 Front page: Emerging sun - view of the Earth from space Foreword As the rate of development in technology is accelerating and civil investments are pushing boundaries always closer to what was considered science-fiction until recently, the exploitation of dual-use technologies is growing in the defence & security ecosystem. If technology is not the only driver in the evolution of warfare, it is the enabler, not to say the trigger, of most of the changes that occurred at the turning point between generations. For a country like Switzerland, Technology Foresight is paramount to identify the opportuni- ties and threats a technology can represent for the different military capabilities building our national armed forces. Rather than picking winners, the Technology Foresight program must provide a comprehensive overview to ensure an early warning about novel relevant technological advances. Identifying potentialities provides the time to build the necessary competences, skills and expertise, in the various fields. In that sense, Technology Foresight must be an integrated element of the doctrine, planing and procurement processes of the armed forces. Only with this strategic futuristic vision, the Swiss armed forces are able to handle, economi- cally and operatively, the evolutions and challenges to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Bang and the Final Theory TOE - Theory of Everything
    Overruling of the Theory of the Beginning - Big Bang and the final Theory TOE - Theory of Everything Based on a 30 year old observation and a 14 year old Simulation of Reality with Q=U or Quantum Potential Energy = Entire Human Population Dissertation and Professorship with 6 additional scientific research reports from May – September 2012 Submitted by: Andraž Pibernik 1701 on „Institute – Terra Simulada Ilimitada“ Established in Belo Horizonte – MG Brazil, 1998 Academic tutors: Alan Zeeper and Erik Margan Eisenstadt 2012 UE2013 2 I assure that this scientific work of arts was written independently and only by myself quoting online-links and scientific means such as books and other media. This multidisciplinary work can be used on any school, college, university or institute as a mean for conducting exams. Eisenstadt, May 1st 2012 ………………………. Developed between Mojstrana, Belo Horizonte & Eisenstadt from Sept. 1987 – May 2012 UE2013 3 With special thanks to the TOE Quest Forum members and their fearful leader … “What a piece of work is a man , how noble in reason, how infinite in faculties , in form and moving, how express and admirable in action, how like an angel, in apprehension, how like a god .” W. Shakespeare What we leave behind is not as important as how we've lived. Quote: Captain Jean-Luc Picard, NCC-1701D, E and ∞ Developed between Mojstrana, Belo Horizonte & Eisenstadt from Sept. 1987 – May 2012 UE2013 4 The author Andraž Pibernik dedicates this work to his fellow citizen, the greatest most interdisciplinary explorer, scientist and poet of all times Jožef Stefan. Jožef Stefan, around the year 1880 Jožef Stefan’s constant in the Max Planck system of units: Where ζ(s) is the Riemann function ζ.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline of Our Mysterious World.Pdf
    Our Mysterious World--a collection of weirdness http://www.geocities.com/nmdecke/MysteriousWorld.html (1 of 455)11/10/2007 12:44:11 AM Our Mysterious World--a collection of weirdness This is a timeline of weird and "Art Bell-ish" events and happenings that I have been collecting off the internet for a while. Yes, many of the entries contradict each other, and others are most likely patent lies, but all of these are in the public literature and you can sort them out for yourselves… Due to some positive notes from readers, I have decided to start updating this list after about a year of ignoring it. I will be adding new stuff bit by bit, with the latest batch on August 1, 2007. Go back to my homepage for more good stuff, please and thank you. Any comments or additions? Send them to me at [email protected] Alpha and Omega Immanentizing of the Eschaton. Whatever the hell that means… 75,000,000 BC Xenu ordered nuking of earth (Per Scientology). Radioactive dust still in geologic strata in the areas of the American southwestern deserts, African deserts, and Gobi desert. Geologists can't explain the "fused green glass" that has been found in such sites as Pierrelatte in Gabon, the Euphrates Valley, the Sahara Desert, the Gobi Desert, Iraq, the Mojave Desert, Scotland, the Old and Middle Kingdoms of Egypt, and south-central Turkey. From the same time period, scientists have found a number of uranium deposits that appear to have been mined or depleted in antiquity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Manhattan Project John Kenneth Christopher Hunt a Thesis in The
    The Manhattan Project John Kenneth Christopher Hunt A Thesis in The Department of English Presented in Partial Fulfllment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in English at Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada Dr. Darren Wershler, Project Supervisor April 2017 © John Kenneth Christopher Hunt 2017 1 2 ABSTRACT The Manhattan Project is a book of lyric poetry that chronicles the discovery of nuclear energy and its subsequent use as both a weapon and a fuel source. The book is grounded in the aesthetic positionality contained in scholar Joyelle McSweeney`s concept of the `necropastoral`, a liminal zone where disparate spaces, such as the classical `urban` and `pastoral`, become blurred. The Manhattan Project examines the enduring impossibility of sufciently responding to the continuing repercussions of the nuclear age and its post-nuclear contaminants through a kind of `resurrection` of lyric meditation, further mutated by both formal constraints and conceptual frameworks. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE ATOMS WE CLEAVE 8 II. THE ARMS RACE Below Oklo 14 Radioactivity 18 The World Set Free 20 Ideal Isotopes 22 Critical Mass 38 Thuringia 40 III. TRINITY 44 IV. GHOSTS OF LOS ALAMOS Valles Caldera 50 Industrial Complex 54 The Demon Core 56 V. MILITARY INCIDENTS Dull Swords 66 Broken Arrows 68 Bent Spear 72 Empty Quivers 73 Faded Giants 75 Nucflash 77 4 VI. RAIN OF RUIN Clear Skies 80 Testimony 84 Operation Epsilon 88 VII. CONTAMINATION Christmas Island 92 Plutonium Valley 94 The East Ural Reserve 96 The Argonne Incident 98 The Human Factor 100 The Elephant’s Foot 102 Caveat Clepta 109 Rising Water 110 VIII.
    [Show full text]
  • Gonzaga Debate Institute 2011 1 Gemini Propulsion Disads Index
    Gonzaga Debate Institute 2011 1 Gemini Propulsion Disads Index Index ..................................................................... 1 Ozone Link – Solid-Chemical Propellant ............ 48 Ozone Link – Liquid-Chemical Propellant .......... 49 ***CHEMICAL*** .................................. 3 Ozone Link/! ........................................................ 50 **Perchlorate D/A ..................................... 4 Ozone ! – Econ/Disease/Species .......................... 51 Ozone ! – Cancer ................................................. 52 Perchlorate 1NC .................................................... 5 Ozone ! – Climate Change ................................... 53 Perchlorate ! – General ......................................... 6 Ozone ! – Disease/Food/Environment ................. 54 Perchlorate ! – Mothers + Kids Health ................. 7 Ozone ! – Warming/Cancer ................................. 55 Perchlorate ! – Water/Cancer ................................ 8 **AFF .................................................................. 56 Perchlorate ! – Water – Timeframe Helper ........... 9 Aff- Environment Friendly Propulsion Coming .. 57 Perchlorate ! – Food ............................................ 10 Aff – A2 – Ozone ! .............................................. 58 Perchlorate ! – Enviro Justice ............................. 11 Aff – A2 – UV Radiation ! .................................. 59 Perchlorate ! – Enviro Justice – Impact .............. 12 Aff – CFCs Good ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Antimatter Underestimated
    Antimatter underestimated ∗ Andre Gsponer and Jean-Pierre Hurni Independent Scientific Research Institute Box 30, CH-1211 Geneva-12, Switzerland e-mail: [email protected] Version ISRI-87-01.2 November 2, 2018 Abstract We warn of the potential nuclear proliferation’s consequences of military applications of nano- or microgram amounts of antimatter, such as triggering of high-yield thermonuclear explosions, laser pumping, compact sources of energy, directed-energy beams, and portable sources of muons. Sir — The first published account of success in immobilizing antiprotons in an electromagnetic trap has been the subject of a recent leading article News and Views editorial [1]. Although this article gives a good overview of the scientific meaning of this historical achievement, it gives in our view a rather misleading perspective on its likely military significance [2]. It is true that for some applications of antimatter, such as antiballistic missile or spacecraft propulsion, relatively large amounts of antiprotons are required. For most other cases, the useful amounts are usually much smaller. For example, we have calculated that less than a microgram of antiprotons is sufficient to trigger a thermonuclear explosion or pump a powerful X-ray laser [3, 4]. But antimatter is not only the most powerful of all high-explosives,it is also the only feasible portable source of muons. In every antiproton annihilation, on the average three muons are produced. These could be used to induce muon-catalysed fusion reactions in a deuterium-helium-3 mixture, an attractive solution for a low- weight neutron-free space nuclear reactor that could be operated in a continuous or pulsed mode.
    [Show full text]
  • Weapon Upgrade Points You Have at This Time to Enhance Or Equip Your Evangelion
    We do not own Evangelion™, Dark Heresy™, Warhammer 40K™, or any other intellectual property to be found within this work in any way. We do not claim ownership of any of the art that appears in this work. Instead, all credit regarding the art should go to the artists of Gainax, or the artists listed below. This work is not to be distributed for money to anyone under any circumstances. However, while we may not be able to claim ownership, it would be unfair to refuse to give credit where credit is due to the following: CREDITS Project Coordination: Black Mesa Janitor (RHM), Elpizo (Sachiel) Development and Playtesting: Artists: Writing and Editing: Blast Anonymous Anonymous ClamPaste bluewine Blast Feldion (RPSS) Drawfag X-09 !W7.CkkM01U CapnKeene HLeviathan (GRGR III) Guardsman Harry Dr. Baron Von Evil Satan Karada Jebus (8546514) CapnKeene J. S. Cervini Feldion (RPSS) Dial LDT-A (RHK) Gilgamesh, King of Heroes Mr_Rage Mastermind Omega !EnkiduOJiw!!fXOkC1tdv81 Latooni vendredi Jebus LawfulNice Vincent “Siege” Angerossa Kamen LDT-A (RHK) Karada macrophage Special Thanks: Mari Mastemind Omega Anonymous Masocristy Touhou Homebrew Guy Archivist Mordegald (OlympusMons) You, for your continued Protagonist Zhuren support. Sorain Highwind Yue ZZEva Table of Contents Intro Berserk 94 What am I looking at? 2 Berserk Types 95 Rebuild of Evangelion 2 Customization 96 Character Creation 3 Biological Upgrades 97 Overview 4 Structural Upgrades 100 Backgrounds 6 Ablative Upgrades 105 Neo-Spartan 7 Weapons 107 Prodigy 9 New Weapon Qualities 108 Manufactured 11 Specific Melee Weapons 111 Impact Survivor 14 General Melee Weapons 113 Characteristics 16 Melee Weapon Upgrades 115 Drawbacks and Assets 17 Ranged Weapons 116 Drawbacks 18 Ballistic 116 Assets 27 Maser 119 Pilot Careers 34 N2 Shell 122 Scale 35 Positron 124 Skirmisher 36 Ranged Weapon Upgrades 126 Pointman 41 New Horizons 127 Berserker 46 Synch Ratio 128 A.T.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications for Nigeria's Higher Education Curricular
    Emerging Technologies and the Internet of all Things: Implications for Nigeria’s higher education curricular Osuagwu, O.E. 1, Eze Udoka Felicia 2, Edebatu D. 3, Okide S. 4, Ndigwe Chinwe 5 and, UzomaJohn-Paul 6 1Department of Computer Science, Imo State University + South Eastern College of Computer Engineering & Information Technology, Owerri, Tel: +234 803 710 1792 [email protected]. 2 Department of Information Mgt. Technology, FUTO 3,4 Department of Computer Science, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Akwa, Anambra State 5 Department of Computer Science, Anambra State University of Science & Technology 6 Department of Computer Science, Alvan Ikoku Federal College of Education, Owerri Abstract The quality of education and graduates emerging from a country’s educational system is a catalyst for technology innovation and national development index. World class universities are showcasing their innovations in science and technology because their high education curricular put the future of Research and Development as their pillar for a brighter world. Our curricular in the higher education system needs a rethink, recasting to embrace innovation, design and production at the heart of what our new generation graduates should be. This article discusses an array of such emerging technologies. Because emerging technologies in all sectors are over 150. we had decided to select three key technologies from each sector for our sample questionnaire. A questionnaire was distributed mainly to educational planners, Lecturers and managers of the industry for purposes of having a feel of how knowledgeable these professionals are understanding developments in science technology and what plans they have to integrate these new knowledge domains so that educational planners can integrate them into the curricular of undergraduate and graduate degree programs in our tertiary institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Antimatter Underestimated Manent Sink for CO
    7_54 ____________ CQRRESPQNDENCE----N_AT_u_RE_v_o_L._32_s_z6_FE_'B_Ru_A_RY_t_9s7 sediments, the latter being the more per­ Antimatter underestimated manent sink for CO,. Perhaps floating lagoons made to trans­ SrR-The first published account of suc­ To develop such weapons would add con­ port sewerage could be towed like ice­ cess in immobilizing antiprotons in an siderable impetus to the current arms bergs (used for soft water irrigation), to electromagnetic trap has been the subject race. We call for an immediate ban on all chosen sites, where the surface waters of a recent leading article in News and antimatter-related research, especially as would be fed by trickle and slow release Views (Nature 324, 299; 1986). Although this work is fundamental to many third­ methods. Natural upwelling of nutrient­ this article gives a good overview of the generation nuclear weapon systems. rich bottom waters of the ocean greatly scientific meaning of this historical ANDRE GsPONER increase their production of living organ­ achievement, it gives in our view a rather JEAN-PIERRE HuRNI isms, (J.H. Ryther Science 166, 72-76; misleading perspective on its likely mili­ Independent Scientific Research Institute, 1969) and artificial methods could be de­ tary significance. 15, Charles-Galland, veloped to extend this process. It is true that for some applications of Ch-1206 Geneva, I look forward to a time when it is poss­ antimatter, such as antiballistic missile or Switzerland ible by careful balancing of the nutrition of spacecraft propulsion, relatively large pH of the biosphere in these and other amounts of antiprotons are required. For ways to treble its content of unoxidized C, most other cases, the useful amounts are SDI boycott as has been accomplished on farms and usually much smaller.
    [Show full text]
  • Adeptus Evangelion – Borderline Edition V1.2 PRODUCTION TYPE
    Adeptus Evangelion – Borderline Edition v1.2 PRODUCTION TYPE Forward This is not an 'official' Adeptus Evangelion release as far as the word can be taken. It is composed entirely of work done by official members of the official Dev team, but is not endorsed by the intellectual property owner in any way. The work you see here is entirely separate of that of 2.5, and was developed entirely off of the leaked Master Edition as a base. Any similarities to 2.5 are either cases of material being taken from this scrapped edition or purely coincidental design. Credit goes to: • BlackMesaJanitor for Adeptus Evangelion as a whole • The various devs who were responsible for whatever Master Edition material remains (who's names I am not privy to) • Dial for the entirety of the xUPs, Combat, and Operations Director chapters, along with number crunching and balance. • Karada for tremendous amounts of formatting and editing, most of Berserker/Berserking, ATT, rewording near everything, and various other influences. • Anonymous guy who wishes to remain anonymous for most of Pointman and Skirmisher, and a lot of help with much of the rest. • Kalyu for the Angel Critical Tables as they are, and influence on A.T. Tactician silly ramiel. • Kamen, LawfulNice and Dr.BaronVonEvilSatan for names and fluff feedback as well as several exploits and generally being helpful. • All the playtesters for being awesome. Version History v1.0 – Initial playable release, 11/20/2011 v1.1 – Full player version release, 12/26/2011 v1.2 – Resources A collection of resources for use with this edition has been collected in the document located at http://tinyurl.com/AdEvaBorderline As well, we have set up an IRC channel for discussing Borderline Edition with others and with the developers, which can be found at #AdEvaBorderline on irc.rizon.net 1 Errata, Reminders, and Concepts Adeptus Evangelion – Borderline Edition assumes that the latest version of the Dark Heresy errata is in use by default in its entirety.
    [Show full text]
  • Results of Search for Magnetized Quark-Nugget Dark Matter from Radial Impacts on Earth J. Pace Vandevender1*, Robert G. Schmitt2, Niall Mcginley3, David G
    Results of Search for Magnetized Quark-Nugget Dark Matter from Radial Impacts on Earth J. Pace VanDevender1*, Robert G. Schmitt2, Niall McGinley3, David G. Duggan4, Seamus McGinty5, Aaron P. VanDevender1, Peter Wilson6, Deborah Dixon7, Helen Girard1, and Jacquelyn McRae1 1 VanDevender Enterprises LLC, 7604 Lamplighter Lane NE, Albuquerque, NM 87109 USA; [email protected] 2 Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185−0840, USA; [email protected] 3 Ardaturr, Churchill PO, Letterkenny, Co. Donegal, Ireland; [email protected] 4 National Park and Wildlife Service, Glenveagh National Park, Church Hill, County Donegal, F92XK02, Ireland; [email protected] 5 Church Hill, Letterkenny, County Donegal, F928982, Ireland, [email protected] 6 School of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Ulster University, Cromore Road, Coleraine, Co. Londonderry, BT52 1SA Northern Ireland, UK; [email protected] 7 DKD Engineering Inc., 801 El Alhambra Cir. NW, Los Ranchos, NM 87107, USA; [email protected] *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Magnetized quark nuggets (MQNs) are a recently proposed dark-matter candidate consistent with the Standard Model and with Tatsumi’s theory of quark-nugget cores in magnetars. Previous publications have covered their formation in the early universe, aggregation into a broad mass distribution before they can decay by the weak force, interaction with normal matter through their magnetopause, and a first observation consistent MQNs: a nearly tangential impact limiting their surface- magnetic-field parameter Bo from Tatsumi’s ~1012+/−1 T to 1.65 × 1012 T +/- 21%. The MQN mass distribution and interaction cross section strongly depend on Bo. Their magnetopause is much larger than their geometric dimensions and can cause sufficient energy deposition to form non-meteorite craters, which are reported approximately annually.
    [Show full text]