Public Accounts of British Columbia Fiscal Year Ended March 31
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Facility Funding Tiers
Facility Funding Tiers Funding # Acute Full Funding Start-Up Health Facility/Hospital Tiers Care Beds per Year Funding Authority Tier 6 – 9 Facilities ** 301+ $500 000 $75 000 FHA Burnaby Hospital PHSA Children’s and Women’s Hospital and Care Centre IHA Kelowna General Hospital VIHA Nanaimo Regional General Hospital FHA Royal Columbian & Eagle Ridge Hospitals VIHA Royal Jubilee & Victoria General Hospitals VCH St. Paul’s and Mount Saint Joseph Hospitals FHA Surrey Memorial Hospital NOTE: VGH $850,000 VCH Vancouver General & UBC Hospitals & GF Strong Tier 5 – 10 Facilities ** 151 to 300 $400 000 $75 000 FHA Abbotsford Regional Hospital and Cancer Centre PHSA BC Cancer Agency FHA Langley Memorial Hospital VCH Lions Gate Hospital FHA Peace Arch District Hospital VCH Richmond Hospital FHA Ridge Meadows Hospital and Health Care Centre IHA Royal Inland Hospital and Hillside Psychiatric NHA University Hospital of Northern BC IHA Vernon Jubilee Hospital Tier 4 – 5 Facilities ** 101 to 150 $300 000 $75 000 FHA Chilliwack General Hospital VIHA Cowichan District Hospital PHSA Forensic Psychiatric Services VIHA North Island Hospital Comox Valley (St. Joseph's Hospital) IHA Penticton Regional Hospital Tier 3 – 7 Facilities ** 51 to 100 $200 000 $35 000* PHSA BC Centre for Disease Control FHA Delta Hospital IHA East Kootenay Regional Hospital IHA Kootenay Boundary Regional Hospital VIHA North Island Hospital Campbell River (Campbell River District General Hospital) VIHA Saanich Peninsula Hospital Tier 2 – 13 Facilities ** 21 to 50 $150 000 $35 000* -
AUTHORIZATION for the RELEASE of HEALTH RECORDS Please Fax Or Mail Your Completed Request to Each Hospital/Facility You Are Requesting Records From
AUTHORIZATION FOR THE RELEASE OF HEALTH RECORDS Please fax or mail your completed request to each hospital/facility you are requesting records from. ATTENTION: Health Information Management, Release of Information Office Part 1. Patient / Resident Information LAST NAME OF PATIENT FIRST NAME ALSO KNOWN AS / ALIAS MAILING ADDRESS CITY / PROVINCE / COUNTRY POSTAL CODE TELEPHONE NO. (INCLUDING AREA CODE) DATE OF BIRTH DAY | MONTH | YEAR PERSONAL HEALTH NUMBER (CARECARD) | | Part 2. Records Requested HOSPITAL(S)/FACILITY: □ VISIT SUMMARY □ EMERGENCY VISIT INFORMATION □ DIAGNOSTIC REPORTS (LAB/RADIOLOGY) □ PROOF OF VISIT □ OUTPATIENT □ OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY): (fees may apply) DATE(S) OF RECORDS REQUESTED: ______________________ TO ___________________________________________ If you do not know exact dates please provide your best estimate Part 3. Person Receiving Records □ MYSELF OR □ NAME OF PERSON RECEIVING THE RECORDS NAME OF COMPANY OR ORGANIZATION (IF APPLICABLE) (LAST, FIRST) MAILING ADDRESS CITY / PROVINCE / COUNTRY POSTAL CODE TELEPHONE NO. (INCLUDING AREA CODE) RECORDS TO BE: □ MAILED □ PICKED UP (Picture ID Required) Part 4. Patient Authorization (12 years of age or older) I, the patient, authorize the Hospital(s)/Facility to release the records requested to the person named in the “Person Receiving Records” section. SIGNATURE OF PATIENT: ___________________________________________ DATE SIGNED: ____________________________ Part 5. Authorization on behalf of Patient (Please complete page 2 of form) (If patient is under 12 years of age or unable to authorize the release of personal information.) By signing below I confirm that I have legal authority to act on behalf of the patient and I hereby authorize the Hospital(s)/Facility to release the records requested to the person named in the “Person Receiving Records” section. -
Sailing Directions (Enroute)
PUB. 154 SAILING DIRECTIONS (ENROUTE) ★ BRITISH COLUMBIA ★ Prepared and published by the NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Bethesda, Maryland © COPYRIGHT 2007 BY THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT NO COPYRIGHT CLAIMED UNDER TITLE 17 U.S.C. 2007 TENTH EDITION For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: http://bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 Preface 0.0 Pub. 154, Sailing Directions (Enroute) British Columbia, 0.0NGA Maritime Domain Website Tenth Edition, 2007, is issued for use in conjunction with Pub. http://www.nga.mil/portal/site/maritime 120, Sailing Directions (Planning Guide) Pacific Ocean and 0.0 Southeast Asia. Companion volumes are Pubs. 153, 155, 157, 0.0 Courses.—Courses are true, and are expressed in the same 158, and 159. manner as bearings. The directives “steer” and “make good” a 0.0 Digital Nautical Chart 26 provides electronic chart coverage course mean, without exception, to proceed from a point of for the area covered by this publication. origin along a track having the identical meridianal angle as the 0.0 This publication has been corrected to 21 July 2007, includ- designated course. Vessels following the directives must allow ing Notice to Mariners No. 29 of 2007. for every influence tending to cause deviation from such track, and navigate so that the designated course is continuously Explanatory Remarks being made good. 0.0 Currents.—Current directions are the true directions toward 0.0 Sailing Directions are published by the National Geospatial- which currents set. -
Pacific Region 1994 Management Plan Geoduck and Horse Clam
PACIFIC REGION 1994 MANAGEMENT PLAN GEODUCK AND HORSE CLAM 1'hiJ Geoduclc and Horse QIJm MtJMgement Plan is intended for general puposes only. When there is a discrepancy between the PlDn and the regulations. the regulations are the final aurhority. description of Areas and Subareas referenced in this Plan can be found in the Pacific Fishery Management Area !guJations. Fisheries Peches and Oceans et Oceans Canada 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS 2. DFO Contacts for Further Information/Geoduck Observers . .. 3 3. SheUfish - Goals and Objectives ..................... ,...................... 4 4. Enforcement Plan .............•...............•......•................. 5 5. Aboriginal Fisheries Strstegy .......•....•.•.•.•.•.•....................... 5 6. Sport Fishing . • . .. 6 7. History of the Horse Clam Fishery . • . • . • . • . • • . .. 6 8. Horse Clam Commercial Fishing Plan - 1994 ...............•.................... 7 8.1. Management Changes ..........................•................. 7 8.2. Seasons, Quotas and Open Times •.. • . • . .. 7 8.3. Permanent Ares Closures . • . • . • . .. 8 8.4. Ucencing.................................................... 8 8.4.1. Ucence Category ........................................ 8 8.4.2. Species .............................................. 8 8.4.3. Gear ............................•................... 8 8.5. Catch and Fisbing Data ........................................... 8 9. History of the Geoduck Fishery . .. 8 10. Geoduck Commercial Fishing Plan - 1994 . • . .. 9 10.1. Management Changes . ... .. 9 -
Climate Resilience Feasibility Study of Facilities at Fraser Canyon Hospital
Climate Resilience Feasibility Study of Facilities at Fraser Canyon Hospital Michal Bartko and Iain Macdonald A1-010678.2 29 September 2017 Climate Resilience Feasibility Study of Buildings at Fraser Canyon Hospital Author Michal Bartko, Ph.D. Research Officer Approved Trevor Nightingale, P.D. Program Leader, High Performance Buildings, NRC Construction Report No: A1-010678.2 Report Date: 29 September 2017 Contract No: A1-010678 Agreement date: 16 December 2016 Program: High Performance Buildings 26 pages Copy no. 1 of 4 This report may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the written consent of the National Research Council Canada and the Client. CLIMATE RESILIENCE FEASIBILITY STUDY OF FACILITIES AT FRASER CANYON HOSPITAL Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. v List of Tables .............................................................................................................................. v Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. vii 2. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 2.1 Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 2 2.2 Fraser Canyon Hospital, Hope ............................................................................................ -
Births by Facility 2015/16
Number of Births by Facility British Columbia Maternal Discharges from April 1, 2015 to March 31, 2016 Ü Number of births: Fort Nelson* <10 10 - 49 50 - 249 250 - 499 500 - 999 Fort St. John 1,000 - 1,499 Wrinch Dawson Creek 1,500 - 2,499 Memorial* & District Mills Chetwynd * ≥ 2,500 Memorial Bulkley Valley MacKenzie & 1,500-2,499 Stuart Lake Northern Prince Rupert District * Births at home with a Haida Gwaii* University Hospital Registered Healthcare Provider of Northern BC Kitimat McBride* St. John G.R. Baker Memorial Haida Gwaii Shuswap Lake General 100 Mile District Queen Victoria Lower Mainland Inset: Cariboo Memorial Port Golden & District McNeill Lions Gate Royal Invermere St. Paul's Cormorant Inland & District Port Hardy * Island* Lillooet Ridge Meadows Powell River Vernon VGH* Campbell River Sechelt Kootenay Elk Valley Burnaby Lake Squamish Kelowna St. Joseph's General BC Women's General Surrey Penticton Memorial West Coast East Kootenay Abbotsford Royal General Regional Richmond Columbian Regional Fraser Creston Valley Tofino Canyon * Peace Langley Nicola General* Boundary* Kootenay Boundary Arch Memorial Nanaimo Lady Minto / Chilliwack Valley * Regional Gulf Islands General Cowichan Saanich District Victoria 0 62.5 125 250 375 500 Peninsula* General Kilometers * Hospital does not offer planned obstetrical services. Source: BC Perinatal Data Registry. Data generated on March 24, 2017 (from data as of March 8, 2017). Number of Births by Facility British Columbia, April 1, 2015 - March 31, 2016 Facility Community Births 100 Mile -
Trauma Services BC a Service of the Provincial Health Services Authority Contents
2015 ANNUAL REPORT Trauma Services BC A service of the Provincial Health Services Authority Contents 3 Foreword 4 Overview 5 BC’s system of organized trauma care 6 Trauma Services BC 7 Vision for BC’s trauma system 8 Governance 9 Trauma Services BC council 10 Strategic plan (2014-2016) 11 Partnerships & collaborations 12 BC Trauma Registry 13 Overview 14 Registry data quality monitoring 15 BC Trauma Registry operations 16 Key achievements 17 Future plans 18 Mechanism of Injury – Provincial overview 19 Regional health authority and partners trauma program report 20 Fraser Health 22 Interior Health 24 Island Health 26 Northern Health 28 Vancouver Coastal Health 30 BC Children’s Hospital 32 Special initiatives 33 Specialist Services Committee Project 34 Performance monitoring & evaluation plan 36 Accreditation Canada Trauma Distinction program 38 Looking forward 40 References and photo credits 42 Appendices 43 Appendix 1 – Inclusion/exclusion criteria for the BC Trauma Registry 44 Appendix 2 – Data quality 46 Appendix 3 – BC trauma program membership Foreword The 2015 annual report describes events and activities Our editor “in-situ” Mr. Beide Bekele, Trauma Services that took place within the calendar year supported by BC’s project manager, who discretely pushed us data from 2013/14. 2015 has been an exciting year of on timelines, content and continuity while working acquisition and building infrastructure for Trauma Services with our graphic artist, Mr. Ernest Stelzer, and PHSA BC with a strategic focus on advancing: communications, all of whom contributed to the look • Optimal service delivery for BC residents reflected in and tone of the report. -
Trauma Distinction Report
Trauma Distinction Report . Fraser Health Authority Surrey, BC On-site Survey Dates: May 15, 2016 - May 19, 2016 Report Issued: July 6, 2016 Distinction About the Distinction Report Fraser Health Authority (referred to in this report as “the organization”) is participating in the Accreditation Canada Distinction program. As part of this ongoing process of quality improvement, an on-site survey was conducted. Information from the on-site survey as well as other data obtained from the organization were used to produce this Distinction Report. On-site survey results are based on information provided by the organization. Accreditation Canada relies on the accuracy of this information to plan and conduct the on-site survey and produce the Distinction Report. Confidentiality This report is confidential and is provided by Accreditation Canada to the organization only. Accreditation Canada does not release the report to any other parties. In the interests of transparency and accountability, Accreditation Canada encourages the organization to disseminate its Distinction Report to staff, board members, clients, the community, and other stakeholders. Any alteration of this Distinction Report compromises the integrity of the process and is strictly prohibited. © Accreditation Canada, 2016 Distinction A Message from Accreditation Canada On behalf of Accreditation Canada, I extend my congratulations to Fraser Health Authority on your participation in a program that recognizes organizations that demonstrate clinical excellence and an outstanding commitment to leadership. I hope you find the Distinction process to be an interesting and informative experience, and that it is providing valuable information that you are using to plan your quality and safety initiatives. -
2015 Annual Report
Albert Myshrall, a wood worker for many years, taught himself how to make hand-crafted banjos and ukeleles. The instruments he crafts from his home in Queen Charlotte City exhibit superior workmanship and sound quality and are showcased in Northern Development’s shop local program. www.lovehaidagwaii.com | Photo credit: Jason Shafto CONTENTS ABOUT THE TRUST .............................. 4 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS .............. 51 Service Region ................................................................ 6 FUND MANAGEMENT ......................... 55 By the Numbers .............................................................. 7 Mission, Values, Ethics Statements .................................. 8 Northwest Readiness ....................................................... 57 Message from the chair and CEO .................................... 10 Connecting bc ................................................................ 58 NCLGA ........................................................................... 58 GOVERNANCE ...................................... 12 Efficient Fund Management and Catalyst 2 ..................... 59 Board of Directors ........................................................... 13 BEST PRACTICES .................................. 60 Regional Advisory Committees ........................................ 14 2015 FUND BALANCES ........................ 67 FINANCIAL OVERVIEW ........................ 16 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT ..... 72 STRATEGIC PLAN AT A GLANCE .......... 19 PROGRAM DELIVERY ......................... -
Energy Resources in BC's Central Interior
Western Geography, 12 (2002), pp. 216–229 ©Western Division, Canadian Association of Geographers Energy Resources in BC’s Central Interior Peter Ostergaard Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer British Columbia Utilities Commission Reliable, convenient, and reasonably priced energy services are a prerequisite for both quality of life and an energy-intensive resource sector in central British Columbia. Investments by governments, Crown corpo- rations, and BC-based companies in energy infra- structure to facilitate regional economic development characterized most of the last 50 years. This is chang- ing. While access to infrastructure remains important, the region’s gas and electricity price advantages are dis- appearing as these commodities are traded across conti- nental infrastructure networks. Future energy invest- ments in the region will be more environmentally benign and perhaps environmentally beneficial, as efforts to continue to mitigate the environmental impacts of reservoirs, reservoir operations, and energy corridors. Introduction The Central Interior’s abundance of low cost energy resources has strongly influenced the evolution of the region’s economy and patterns of settlement. Aside from biomass supplies (e.g., firewood, pulping liquor, hog fuel), the region imports most of its energy needs using a highly developed and reliable network of oil and gas pipelines and power transmission lines. Access to these supplies has been a prerequisite to attracting the energy intensive, resource based industries upon which the region will continue to depend. However, these abundant, low cost supplies have come at an envi- ronmental cost, primarily in the form of flooded valley bottoms and land alienated by pipeline and transmission corridors. Energy Resources in BC’s Central Interior 217 Historical Context Traditionally when we think of energy, its sources come to mind. -
Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Scienes No
Scientific Excellence • Resource Protection & Conservation • Benefits for Canadians Excellence scientifique • Protection et conservation des ressources • Bénéfices aux Canadiens DF° iii ii i1iii ii iiiiii I II Shellfish Stock Assessments for the West Coast of Canada in 1990 as Reviewed by the Pacific Stock Assessment Review Committee (PSARC) G. A. Thomas Editor Department of Fisheries and Oceans Fisheries Branch 417 Second Avenue West Prince Rupert, British Columbia, V8J 1G8 December 1990 Canadian Manuscript Report of Jf a_3 Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences F No. 2099 4,1 eç Fisheries Pêches 1+1 and Oceans et Océans Canada. Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Manuscript reports contain scientific and technical information that contributes to existing knowledge but which deals with national or regional problems. Distribu- tion is restricted to institutions or individuals located in particular regions of Canada. However, no restriction is placed on subject matter, and the series reflects the broad interests and policies of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, namely, fis heries and aquatic sciences. Manuscript reports may be cited as full publications. The correct citation appears above the abstract of each report. Each report is abstracted in Aquatic. Sciences and Fisherie.s. Abstracts and indexed in the Department's annual index to scientific and technical publications. Numbers l-900 in this series were issued as Manuscript Reports (Biological Series) of the Biological Board of Canada, and subsequent to 1937 when the name of the Board was changed by Act of Parliament, as Manuscript Reports (Biological Series) of the Fis heries Research Board of Canada. Numbers 901 1425 were issued as Manuscript Reports of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. -
Pacs Opinion Survey: Referring Physicians
PACS OPINION SURVEY: REFERRING PHYSICIANS As a user of PACS, your opinion on PACS would be greatly appreciated in the PACS Opinion survey. This survey has been designed by Canada Health Infoway with the input of radiology experts. The purpose of this survey is to gather your opinion on the impact PACS has had on image access, patient care, patient transfers, duplicate tests, productivity, report turnaround time, etc. The results from many project sites across Canada will be used to develop a national view of the state of the diagnostic imaging environment since the implementation of PACS. Information that is obtained during this survey will be kept confidential to the full extent permitted by the law. You will not be identified by name in any reports of the completed survey; your responses will only be analyzed in aggregate by Canada Health Infoway or a third party that has been contracted for analysis. All identifiers in the records of data will be removed. Records of the data, identifying participants by code number only, will be stored on a fire-wall protected server and protected by password. Only authorized users will have access. Your opinion on the impact of this technology is important as it will assist in the measurement of the “actual” benefits created by technologies that are implemented to improve timely access to patient results and to establish the shared electronic patient record. INSTRUCTIONS The survey should take about 5-10 minutes to complete. Please return the survey in the enclosed envelope by Friday, March 3rd, 2006. If you have any questions about the survey please contact Nancy Kraetschmer at Canada Health Infoway at (416) 595-3164 or [email protected] 1.